Освободи голову. Экспресс-метод для сохранения ясности ума, улучшения концентрации и развития креативности

Источники

1. Lohmann-Haislah, A., Stressreport Deutschland, B.f.A.u. Arbeitsmedizin, Editor. 2012.

2. TK, Schalt mal ab, Deutschland – TK-Studie zur Digitalkompetenz 2021, T. Krankenkasse, Editor. 2021.

3. Maier, L. J., J. A. Ferris, and A. R. Winstock, Pharmacological cognitive enhancement among non-ADHD individuals – A cross-sectional study in 15 countries. International Journal of Drug Policy, 2018. 58: p. 104–112.

4. Middendorff, E., et al., Formen der Stresskompensation und Leistungssteigerung bei Studierenden – HISBUS-Befragung zur Verbreitung und zu Mustern von Hirndoping und Medikamentenmissbrauch. 2012.

5. Urban, K. R. and W.-J. Gao, Performance enhancement at the cost of potential brain plasticity: neural ramifications of nootropic drugs in the healthy developing brain. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2014. 8(38).

6. Luckner, A., Klugheit. 2012: De Gruyter.

7. James, W., The Principles of Psychology. 2007: Lightning Source Incorporated.

8. Docter, P., Alles steht Kopf. 2015, Walt Disney Studios: USA.

9. Haselstein, U., Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. Gertrude Steins Laborexperimente und ihre literarischen Folgen. Poetica, 2017. 49(3/4): p. 256–284.

10. Nolte, K., Der Kampf um die Aufmerksamkeit. 2005, Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

11. Franck, G., Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit. Merkur, 1993. 47: p. 748–761.

12. Aristoteles, De Sensu et Sensibilibus – On Sense an the Sensible. 2010: Kessinger Publishing.

13. Lorenz-Spreen, P., et al., Accelerating dynamics of collective attention. Nature Communications, 2019. 10.

14. Telzer, E.H., et al., The effects of poor quality sleep on brain function and risk taking in adolescence. Neuroimage, 2013. 71: p. 275–83.

15. McDaniel, B. and S. Coyne,»Technoference«: The Interference of Technology in Couple Relationships and Implications for Women’s Personal and Relational Well-Being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2014. 5.

16. Toffler, A., Future Shock. 1970: Random House.

17. Scally, A. and R. Durbin, Revising the human mutation rate: implications for understanding human evolution. Nat Rev Genet, 2012. 13(10): p. 745–53.

18. Bohn, R. and J. Short, How Much Information? 2009 Report on American Consumers. 2009.

19. Nielsen. AVERAGE U.S. INTERNET USAGE. 2013; https://www.nielsen.com/tw/en/insights/article/2013/january-2013-top-u-sentertainment– sites-and-web-brands/.

20. Burke, K. How many texts do people send every day. 2018; https://www.textrequest.com/blog/how-many-texts-people-send-per-day/.

21. Techjury. The surprising reality of how many emails are sent per day.2020; https://techjury.net/blog/how-many-emails-are-sent-per-day/#gref.

22. Askwonder.com. How many times are people interrupted by push notifications?; https://askwonder.com/research/times-people-interrupted– push-notifications-163c8n1hc.

23. FAZ.NET, Haseloff bekommt tausende Likes für ein» A«, in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 2021.

24. Wissenschaft, S., Älteste Bibliothek Deutschlands entdeckt, in Spiegel. 2018.

25. Blair, A., Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information Before the Modern Age. 2010: Yale University Press.

26. Hauff, E., Die ›Einkommenden Zeitungen‹ von 1650. Ein Beitrag Zur Geschichte der Tageszeitung. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 1963. 9(3): p. 227–235.

27. Statista. 2020; https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/195096/umfrage/anzahl-neuer-artikel-pro-tag-bei-wikipedia/.

28. Brandwatch. 2020; https://www.brandwatch.com/de/blog/facebook-statistiken/.

29. Benselin, J. C. and G. Ragsdell, Information overload: The differences that age makes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2016. 48(3): p. 284–297.

30. Sicilia, M. and S. Ruiz de Maya, The effects of the amount of information on cognitive responses in online purchasing tasks. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2010. 9: p. 183–191.

31. Phys.Org. Google Boss worries about teen reading. Phys.Org 2010; https://phys.org/news/2010 – 01-google-boss-teen.html.

32. Koroleva, K., H. Krasnova, and O. Günther, ›STOP SPAMMING ME!‹ – Exploring Information Overload on Facebook, in AMCIS. 2010.

33. Bromberg-Martin, E. S. and O. Hikosaka, Midbrain dopamine neurons signal preference for advance information about upcoming rewards. Neuron, 2009. 63(1): p. 119 – 26.

34. Sandstrom, P. E., An Optimal Foraging Approach to Information Seeking and Use. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 1994. 64(4): p. 414–449.

35. Schultz, W., Dopamine reward prediction error coding. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2016. 18(1): p. 23–32.

36. Wittmann, B.C., et al., Anticipation of novelty recruits reward system and hippocampus while promoting recollection. Neuroimage, 2007. 38(1): p. 194–202.

37. Sapolsky, R. M., Monkeyluv: And Other Essays on Our Lives as Animals. 2006: Scribner.

38. Moreira, P. S., et al., Impact of Chronic Stress Protocols in Learning and Memory in Rodents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 2016. 11(9): p. e0163245.

39. Spencer, J. P., The Development of Working Memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2020. 29(6): p. 545–553.

40. Miller, G. A., The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev, 1956. 63(2): p. 81–97.

41. Cowan, N., The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci, 2001. 24(1): p. 87–114; discussion 114–85.

42. Völter, C. J., et al., Chimpanzees flexibly update working memory contents and show susceptibility to distraction in the self-ordered search task. Proc Biol Sci, 2019. 286(1907): p. 20190715.

43. Brady, T. F., et al., Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008. 105(38): p. 14325– 9.

44. Schermer, F. J., Lernen und Gedächtnis, ed. M. von Salisch. 70565 Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag.

45. Dyson, M. and M. Haselgrove, The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 2000. 23: p. 210–223.

46. Zickerick, B., et al., Don’t stop me now: Hampered retrieval of action plans following interruptions. Psychophysiology, 2021. 58(2): p. e13725.

47. Ratz, M., et al., Second Screen: User Behaviour of Spectators while Watching Football. Athens Journal of Sports, 2016. 3: p. 119–128.

48. Neate, T., M. Jones, and M. Evans, Cross-device media: a review of second screening and multi-device television. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2017. 21.

49. Brasel, S. A. and J. Gips, Media multitasking behavior: concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2011. 14(9): p. 527–34.

50. IQ, F., Mobilgeräte und Fernsehen: Bildschirmhopping. 2017.

51. Cheyne, J. A., J. S. A. Carriere, and D. Smilek, Age differences in attention lapses mask age differences in memory failures: a methodological note on suppression. Frontiers in psychology, 2013. 4: p. 99–99.

52. Risko, E. and S. Gilbert, Cognitive Offloading. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2016. 20.

53. Sparrow, B., J. Liu, and D. M. Wegner, Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 2011. 333(6043): p. 776–8.

54. Tamir, D., et al., Media usage diminishes memory for experiences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2018. 76: p. 161–168.

55. Liu, X., et al., Internet Search Alters Intra– and Inter-regional Synchronization in the Temporal Gyrus. Front Psychol, 2018. 9: p. 260.

56. Brayne, C., et al., Education, the brain and dementia: neuroprotection or compensation?: EClipSE Collaborative Members. Brain, 2010. 133(8): p. 2210–2216.

57. Dong, G. and M. N. Potenza, Behavioural and brain responses related to Internet search and memory. Eur J Neurosci, 2015. 42(8):p. 2546–54.

58. Delgado, P., et al., Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 2018. 25: p. 23–38.

59. Rayner, K., et al., So Much to Read, So Little Time: How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help? Psychol Sci Public Interest, 2016. 17(1): p. 4–34.

60. Fitzsimmons, G., M. Weal, and D. Drieghe, On Measuring the Impact of Hyperlinks on Reading. 2013.

61. Simola, J., et al., The Impact of Salient Advertisements on Reading and Attention on Web Pages. Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 2011. 17: p. 174–90.

62. Obar, J., The Biggest Lie on the Internet: Ignoring the Privacy Policies and Terms of Service Policies of Social Networking Services. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016.

63. Team, S., Study: 70 % of Facebook Users only read the headline of scienc stories before commenting, in The Science Post. 2018.

64. Gabielkov, M., et al., Social Clicks: What and Who gets read on Twitter. ACM Sigmetrics / IFIP Performance, 2016.

65. Ackroyd, P., The Life and Times of Charles Dickens. 2003: Hydra Pub.

66. Hyman Jr, I. E., et al., Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2010. 24(5): p. 597–607.

67. Mack, A. and I. Rock, Inattentional blindness. Inattentional blindness. 1998, Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press. xiv, 273-xiv, 273.

68. Simons, D. J. and C. F. Chabris, Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 1999. 28(9): p. 1059–74.

69. Selective attention test. 2010.

70. Alkureishi, M. A., et al., Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review. Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. 31(5): p. 548–560.

71. Schofield, T., J. Creswell, and T. Denson, Brief mindfulness induction reduces inattentional blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 2015. 37: p. 63–70.

72. Kreitz, C., et al., Some See It, Some Don’t: Exploring the Relation between Inattentional Blindness and Personality Factors. PLOS ONE, 2015. 10(5): p. e0128158.

73. Craik, F. and R. Lockhart, Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972. 11: p. 671.

74. Souza, A.S., et al., Focused attention improves working memory: implications for flexible-resource and discrete-capacity models. Atten Percept Psychophys, 2014. 76(7): p. 2080 – 102.

75. Annie, A., The Stat of Mobile 2020. 2020.

76. Johnson, S., The beauties of Samuel Johnson, consisting of maxims and observations, moral, critical, and miscellaneous. 1819, Edinburgh: J. Robertson. 304 p.

77. Kipling, R., Kim. 1922: Doubleday, Page.

78. McCormick-Huhn, J. M., C. R. Bowman, and N. A. Dennis, Repeated study of items with and without repeated context: aging effects on memory discriminability. Memory, 2018. 26(5): p. 603–609.

79. Mawby, J., A. Foster, and D. Ellis, Everyday life information seeking behaviour in relation to the environment: Disposable information? Library Review, 2015. 64: p. 468–479.

80. Isikman, E. and L. Cavanaugh, The Effects of Curiosity-Evoking Events on Activity Enjoyment. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016.

81. Röd, W., Geschichte der Philosophie Bd. 1: Die Philosophie der Antike 1: Von Thales bis Demokrit. 3 ed. 1976: Verlag C. H. Beck.

82. Lutz, R., Euthyme Therapie. 2009. p. 551–567.

83. Przybylski, A. and N. Weinstein, Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences faceto-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2013. 30: p. 237–246.

84. Ramsey, R. and R. Sohi, Listening to your customers: The impact of perceived salesperson listening behavior on relationship outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1997. 25: p. 127–137.

85. Misra, S., et al., The iPhone Effect: The Quality of In-Person Social Interactions in the Presence of Mobile Devices. Environment and Behavior, 2016. 48(2): p. 275–298.

86. Diefenbach, S. and D. Ullrich, Digitale Depression: Wie die neuen Medien unser Glücksempfinden verändern. 2016: mvg Verlag.

87. Brynjolfsson, E., A. Collis, and F. Eggers, Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019

88. Eppler, M. and J. Mengis, The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature From Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines. Inf. Soc., 2004. 20: p. 325–344.

89. Schleiermacher, F., Apologie des Sokrates. 2018: LIWI Literatur– und Wissenschaftsverlag.

90. Judd, T., Making sense of multitasking: Key behaviours. Computers & Education, 2013. 63: p. 358–367.

91. Stone, L. Continous partial attention. 2020; https://lindastone.net/about/continuous-partial-attention/.

92. Christakou, A., et al., Disorder-specific functional abnormalities during sustained attention in youth with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and with autism. Mol Psychiatry, 2013. 18(2): p. 236–44.

93. Zanto, T.P., et al., Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory. Nature neuroscience, 2011. 14(5): p. 656–661.

94. Rottwilm, C. So crashte der Mann von PwC die Oscar-Show. Manager Magazin 2017; https://www.manager-magazin.de/lifestyle/leute/oscars-2017-pwc-mann-twitterte-kurz-vor-der-panne-unerlaubt-a– 1136625.html.

95. Adamczyk, P. D. and B. Bailey. If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution, in CHI ’04. 2004.

96. Grundgeiger, T., et al., Effects of Interruptions on Prospective Memory Performance in Anesthesiology. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2008. 52.

97. Monk, C. A., D. Boehm-Davis, and J. Trafton, Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2004. 46: p. 650–663.

98. LeGoullon, M., D. Boehm-Davis, and R. Holt, Model-Based Predictions of Interrupted Checklists. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2002. 46.

99. Baethge, A. and T. Rigotti, Interruptions to workflow: Their relationship with irritation and satisfaction with performance, and the mediating roles of time pressure and mental demands. Work & Stress, 2013. 27(1): p. 43–63.

100. Leroy, S., Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009. 109(2): p. 168–181.

101. Altmann, E. and J. Trafton, Task Interruption: Resumption Lag and the Role of Cues. 2004.

102. Bailey, B. P. and J. A. Konstan, On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 2006. 22(4): p. 685–708.

103. Mark, G., D. Gudith, and U. Klocke. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. in CHI. 2008.

104. Kerr, J. I., et al., The effects of acute work stress and appraisal on psychobiological stress responses in a group office environment. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2020. 121: p. 104837.

105. Eyrolle, H. and J.-M. Cellier, The effects of interruptions in work activity: field and laboratory results. Applied Ergonomics, 2000. 31(5): p. 537–543.

106. End, C., et al., Costly Cell Phones: The Impact of Cell Phone Rings on Academic Performance. Teaching of Psychology – TEACH PSYCHOL, 2010. 37.

107. Altmann, E. M., J. G. Trafton, and D. Z. Hambrick, Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. J Exp Psychol Gen, 2014. 143(1): p. 215– 26.

108. Pashler, H. E., Task switching and multitask performance. Attention and Performance, 2000. 18.

109. Vollrath, M., et al., Do German drivers use their smartphones safely? – Not really! Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2016. 96: p. 29–38.

110. Weishuber, C., Neue Allianz Sicherheitsstudie – Ältere Fußgängerleben gefährlich. 2019.

111. Verkehrsicherheit, K.f. Mehr Unfälle wegen Smartphone-Zombies. 2019; https://wien.orf.at/stories/3006616/.

112. Wajcman, J. and E. Rose, Constant Connectivity: Rethinking Interruptions at Work. Organization Studies, 2011. 32(7): p. 941–961.

113. Bailey, B., J. Konstan, and J. Carlis, The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface. INTERACT, 2004.

114. Udemy, Workplace Distraction Report. 2018.

115. Lin, B. C., J. M. Kain, and C. Fritz, Don’t interrupt me! An examina tion of the relationship between intrusions at work and employee strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 2013. 20(2): p. 77–94.

116. Chen, A. and E. Karahanna, Personal Life Interrupted: Understanding the Effects of Technology-Mediated Interruptions from Work to Personal Life. Vol. 2. 2011.

117. Depth, U. i., 2018 Workplace Distraction Report. 2018.

118. Juneja, P., The Economic Effects of Digital Distractions, M.S.G.C. Team, Editor. 2015.

119. Solow, R. We’d Better Watch Out. 1987.

120. Center, M. N., Microsoft releases findings and considerations from one year of remote work in Work Trend Index. 2021, Microsoft News Center.

121. McLaren, C., J. Null, and J. Quinn, Heat stress from enclosed vehicles: moderate ambient temperatures cause significant temperature rise in enclosed vehicles. Pediatrics, 2005. 116(1): p. e109 – 12.

122. Charron, S. and E. Koechlin, Divided representation of concurrent goals in the human frontal lobes. Science, 2010. 328(5976): p. 360–3.

123. Burgess, P., et al., The cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of multitasking. Neuropsychologia, 2000. 38: p. 848–863.

124. Dreher, J.-C., et al., Damage to the Fronto-Polar Cortex Is Associated with Impaired Multitasking. PloS one, 2008. 3: p. e3227.

125. Moisala, M., et al., Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults. NeuroImage, 2016. 134.

126. AUSTAR, N.G.o. Test your Brain – Multitasking. 2011; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r5-jrzNjI4.

127. Strayer, D. and J. M Watson, Supertaskers and the Multitasking Brain. Scientific American Mind, 2012. 23: p. 22–29.

128. Szameitat, A., et al.,»Women Are Better Than Men«-Public Beliefs on Gender Differences and Other Aspects in Multitasking. PloS one, 2015. 10: p. e0140371.

129. Hirsch, P., I. Koch, and J. Karbach, Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations. PloS one, 2019. 14(8): p. e0220150-e0220150.

130. Wilson, G., Infomania Experiment. 2005.

131. FAZ.NET, Mailen schadet dem IQ mehr als Kiffen, in Frankfurter All

132. Jeong, S.-H. and Y. Hwang, Media Multitasking Effects on Cognitive vs. Attitudinal Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis: Media Multitasking Effects. Human Communication Research, 2016. 42.

133. Wikipedia. Eisenbahnunfall von Bad Aibling. 2020; https://de.wikipedia. org/wiki/Eisenbahnunfall_von_Bad_Aibling.

134. Wilm, S., et al., Wann unterbricht der Hausarzt seine Patienten zu Beginn der Konsultation? Z Allg Med, 2004.

135. Anderer, J. Hurry Up! Modern Patience Thresholds Lower Than Ever Before, Technology To Blame. 2019; https://www.studyfinds.org/ hurry-up-modern-patience-thresholds-lower-than-ever-beforesurvey-finds/.

136. Krishnan, S. S. and R. K. Sitaraman, Video stream quality impacts viewer behavior: inferring causality using quasi-experimental designs, in Proceedings of the 2012 Internet Measurement Conference. 2012, Association for Computing Machinery: Boston, Massachusetts, USA. p. 211–224.

137. Lutz, A., et al., Mental Training Enhances Attentional Stability: Neural and Behavioral Evidence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2009. 29(42): p. 13418 – 13427.

138. Sarter, M., W. J. Gehring, and R. Kozak, More attention must be paid: the neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain Res Rev, 2006. 51(2): p. 145– 60.

139. Zhou, Y., Leonardo da Vinci – Konzentration und Ablenkung eines Genies. Epoch Times Deutschland 2008. 4.

140. Stanhope, P., Über die Kunst, ein Gentleman zu sein. Briefe an seinen Sohn. Aus dem Englischen von Gisbert Haefs. 2019: Manesse Verlag.

141. Beattie, J., The Works of James Beattie – Dissertations Moral and Critical. 1783, Philadelphia: Hopkins & Earle.

142. Ribot, T. and M. Dietze, Die Psychologie der Aufmerksamkeit. 1908/2010: Kessinger Pub Co.

143. Rebok, G.W., et al., Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2014. 62(1): p. 16–24.

144. Ball, K., et al., Cognitive training decreases motor vehicle collision involvement of older drivers. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2010. 58(11): p. 2107–13.

145. Brehmer, Y., H. Westerberg, and L. Bäckman, Working-memory training in younger and older adults: training gains, transfer, and maintenance. Front Hum Neurosci, 2012. 6: p. 63.

146. Fukuda, K. and E. K. Vogel, Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture. Psychol Sci, 2011. 22(3): p. 361–8.

147. de Fockert, J. W., et al., The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 2001. 291(5509): p. 1803–6.

148. Sörqvist, P. and J. E. Marsh, How Concentration Shields Against Distraction. Current directions in psychological science, 2015. 24(4): p. 267–272.

149. Verhaeghen, P. and J. Cerella, Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2002. 26(7): p. 849–857.

150. Gazzaley, A., et al., Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience, 2005. 8(10): p. 1298–1300.

151. Glenberg, A. M., J. L. Schroeder, and D. A. Robertson, Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Mem Cognit, 1998. 26(4): p. 651–8.

152. Zanto, T. P. and A. Gazzaley, Neural suppression of irrelevant information underlies optimal working memory performance. J Neurosci, 2009. 29(10): p. 3059–66.

153. Busch, V., Buschtrommel: Von Bäumen und Briefumschlägen. 2019.

154. Google. Find a balance with technology that feels right for you. 2019; https://wellbeing.google/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=well_being&utm_term=google_wellbeing& gclid=CjwKCAiAlNf-BRB_EiwA2osbxWRSxGUDIDE70YWThBzlarKY0M21AB3x-bMfu2maHnhWO_tHcn8YIBoCXeQQAvD_BwE.

155. Söderlund, G. B. W., et al., The effects of background white noise on memory performance in inattentive school children. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2010. 6(1): p. 55.

156. Musliu, A., et al., The Impact of Music on Memory. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 2017. 10: p. 222.

157. Perham, N. and J. Vizard, Can preference for background music mediate the irrelevant sound effect? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2011. 25(4): p. 625–631.

158. Reaves, S., et al., Turn Off the Music! Music Impairs Visual Associative Memory Performance in Older Adults. Gerontologist, 2016. 56(3): p. 569 – 77.

159. Wang, Z. and J. M. Tchernev, The» Myth «of Media Multitasking: Reciprocal Dynamics of Media Multitasking, Personal Needs, and Gratifications. Journal of Communication, 2012. 62(3): p. 493–513.

160. Yeykelis, L., J. J. Cummings, and B. Reeves, Multitasking on a Single Device: Arousal and the Frequency, Anticipation, and Prediction of Switching Between Media Content on a Computer. Journal of Communication, 2014. 64(1): p. 167–192.

161. Group, T. R., Email Statistics Report, 2020–2024–Executive Summary. 2020.

162. Billieux, J., Problematic use of the mobile phone: A literature review and a pathways model. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 2012. 8(4): p. 299–307.

163. Fried, I., et al., Electric current stimulates laughter. Nature, 1998. 391(6668): p. 650–650.

164. Lachmann, O., Die Bekenntnisse des heiligen Augustinus. Reclams Universal Bibliothek, ed. Reclam. Vol. 2791/94a. 1888, Leipzig.

165. Valdez, P., Circadian Rhythms in Attention. The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2019. 92(1): p. 81–92.

166. Currey, M. and M. Currey, Daily rituals: how artists work. 2013.

167. Backhaus, N., A. Tisch, and A. Wöhrmann, BAuA-Arbeitszeitbefragung: Vergleich 2015–2017, in Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin 2018, BaAuA, Editor. 2018.

168. Wendsche, J. and A. Lohmann-Haislah, Ein Scoping-Review zur Wirkung von Arbeitspausen auf die Gesundheit. 2016.

169. Bosch, C. and S. Sonnentag, Should I Take a Break? A Daily Reconstruction Study on Predicting Micro-Breaks at Work. International Journal of Stress Management, 2018. 26.

170. Tine, M., Acute aerobic exercise: an intervention for the selective visual attention and reading comprehension of low-income adolescents. Front Psychol, 2014. 5: p. 575.

171. Kang, S. and T. R. Kurtzberg, Reach for your cell phone at your own risk: The cognitive costs of media choice for breaks. J Behav Addict, 2019. 8(3): p. 395–403.

172. Ariga, A. and A. Lleras, Brief and rare mental» breaks «keep you focused: Deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements. Cognition, 2011. 118(3): p. 439–443.

173. Busch, V., et al., The effect of deep and slow breathing on pain perception, autonomic activity, and mood processing – an experimental study. Pain Med, 2012. 13(2): p. 215–28.

174. Ma, X., et al., The Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing on Attention, Negative Affect and Stress in Healthy Adults. Frontiers in psychology, 2017. 8: p. 874–874.

175. Ulrich, R. S., View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 1984. 224(4647): p. 420–1.

176. Djernis, D., et al., A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nature-Based Mindfulness: Effects of Moving Mindfulness Training into an Outdoor Natural Setting. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. 16(17): p. 3202.

177. Berman, M. G., et al., Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. J Affect Disord, 2012. 140(3): p. 300–5.

178. Stenfors, C. U. D., et al., Positive Effects of Nature on Cognitive Performance Across Multiple Experiments: Test Order but Not Affect Modulates the Cognitive Effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019. 10(1413).

179. Kaplan, S., The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1995. 15(3): p. 169–182.

180. Ohly, H., et al., Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 2016. 19(7): p. 305–343.

181. Lee, K. E., et al., 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015. 42: p. 182–189.

182. Song, C., H. Ikei, and Y. Miyazaki, Physiological Effects of Visual Stimulation with Forest Imagery. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. 15(2): p. 213.

183. AL-Ayash, A., et al., The influence of color on student emotion, heart rate, and performance in learning environments. Color Research & Application, 2016. 41(2): p. 196–205.

184. Ueland, B., If You Want to Write. 1987: Graywolf Press.

185. Fink, A., et al., The Creative Brain: Investigation of Brain Activity During Creative Problem Solving by Means of EEG and fMRI. Human brain mapping, 2009. 30: p. 734–48.

186. Kleibeuker, S. W., et al., Prefrontal cortex involvement in creative problem solving in middle adolescence and adulthood. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2013. 5: p. 197–206.

187. GUS, S., Maßnahmen zur Gesundheitsförderung, Prävention und Rehabilitation mit Effektivitätsnachweisen. Fachbereich Gesundheitspsychologie in der Sektion GUS im Berufsverband der DPP (BDP), 2005.

188. Thoits, P.A., Stressors and Problem-Solving: The Individual as Psychological Activist. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1994. 35(2): p. 143–160.

189. Chinaveh, M., The Effectiveness of Problem-solving on Coping Skills and Psychological Adjustment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013. 84: p. 4–9.

190. Bucay, J. and S. von Harrach, Komm, ich erzähl dir eine Geschichte. 2011: FISCHER E-Books.

191. Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., et al., Problematic Use of Mobile Phones in Australia … Is It Getting Worse? Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2019. 10(105).

192. Statista. Anteil der Freizeit in der OECD nach Ländern. 2009; https:// de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/37072/umfrage/freizeitanteilan-einem-durchschnittlichen-tag-in-der-oecd-nach-laendern/.

193. Wiessner, P. W., Embers of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014. 111(39): p. 14027–14035.

194. Boyd, B., The evolution of stories: from mimesis to language, from fact to fiction. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2018. 9(1): p. e1444.

195. Killingsworth, M. A. and D. T. Gilbert, A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind. Science, 2010. 330(6006): p. 932–932.

196. Nightingale, A., Augustine on Extending Oneself to God through Intention in advance. Augustinian Studies, 2015. 46.

197. Teasdale, J. D., et al., Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources. Mem Cognit, 1995. 23(5): p. 551–9.

198. Lagerfeld, K., Tagträumen ist vielleicht die wichtigste Arbeit in meinem Leben. Bild, 2012.

199. Raichle, M. E., et al., A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

200. Beaty, R. E., et al., Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest. Neuropsychologia, 2014. 64: p. 92–98.

201. Kühn, S., et al., The Importance of the Default Mode Network in Creativity – A Structural MRI Study. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2014. 48.

202. Mooneyham, B. and J. Schooler, The Costs and Benefits of Mind-Wandering: A Review. Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2013. 67: p. 11–8.

203. Li, W., X. Mai, and C. Liu, The default mode network and social understanding of others: what do brain connectivity studies tell us. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2014. 8(74).

204. Van Hoeck, N., et al., Counterfactual thinking: an fMRI study on changing the past for a better future. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2013. 8(5): p. 556–564.

205. Wise, T., et al., Instability of default mode network connectivity in major depression: a two-sample confirmation study. Translational Psychiatry, 2017. 7(4): p. e1105-e1105.

206. Collins, S., A Killer Story: An Interview with Suzanne Collins, the author of» The Hunger Games«, R. Margolis, Editor. 2008.

207. Pallier, G. and N. Tiliopoulos, Take a break: A look at the incubation effect on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences: Theory, Assessment, and Application, 2011: p. 83–92.

208. Baird, B., et al., Inspired by distraction: mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychol Sci, 2012. 23(10): p. 1117–22.

209. Abrams, L. and D. Davis, The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Who, what, and why. 2016. p. 13–54.

210. Hadamard, J., The Mathematician’s Mind: The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. 1945: Princeton University Press.

211. Kant, I., Anthropologie in Pragmatischer Hinsicht. 2000: Felix Meiner Verlag.

212. Wallach, M. A., American Educational Research Journal, 1968. 5(2): p. 272–281.

213. Kim, K. H., The Creativity Crisis: The Decrease in Creative Thinking Scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 2011. 23(4): p. 285–295.

214. Flynn, J. R., Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 1987. 101(2): p. 171–191.

215. Teasdale, T. and D. Owen, A long-term rise and recent decline in intelligence test performance: The Flynn Effect in reverse. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005. 139: p. 837–843.

216. Byron, K., S. Khazanchi, and D. Nazarian, The Relationship Between Stressors and Creativity: A Meta-Analysis Examining Competing Theoretical Models. The Journal of applied psychology, 2010. 95: p. 201– 12.

217. Atchley, R., D. Strayer, and P. Atchley, Creativity in the Wild: Improving Creative Reasoning through Immersion in Natural Settings. PloS one, 2012. 7: p. e51474.

218. Williams, K. J. H., et al., Conceptualising creativity benefits of nature experience: Attention restoration and mind wandering as complementary processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2018. 59: p. 36–45.

219. Gottfried, S., Niksen is the dutch lifestyle concept of doing nothing 2019; https://time.com/5622094/what-is-niksen/.

220. Eastwood, J. D., et al., The Unengaged Mind: Defining Boredom in Terms of Attention. Perspect Psychol Sci, 2012. 7(5): p. 482–95.

221. Wilson, T., et al., Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind. Science (New York, N.Y.), 2014. 345: p. 75–7.

222. Pollinger, L., Schmerzwahrnehmung und Verhaltensreaktionen unter verschiedenen Außenreizbedingungen, in publication process, 2020. Inaugural-Dissertation.

223. Carolus, A., et al., Smartphones as digital companions: Characterizing the relationship between users and their phones. New Media & Society, 2019. 21(4): p. 914–938.

224. Jourard, S., An exploratory study of body-accessibility. The British journal of social and clinical psychology, 1966. 5 3: p. 221–31.

225. dscout, I., How much are we really attached to your phones physically, cognitively. 2016.

226. Busch, V. and S. Diefenbach, Digital Detox – ist Smartphone-Fastensinnvoll? Deutschlandfunk, Editor. 2019.

227. Marton, F., P. Fensham, and S. Chaiklin, A Nobel’s eye view of scientific intuition: discussions with the Nobel prize-winners in physics, chemistry and medicine (1970-86). International Journal of Science Education, 1994. 16(4): p. 457–473.

228. Inbar, Y., J. Cone, and T. Gilovich, People’s Intuitions About Intuitive Insight and Intuitive Choice. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2010. 99: p. 232–47.

229. Matzler, K., F. Bailom, and T. Mooradian, Intuitive Decision Making. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2007. 49: p. 13–15.

230. Dane, E., K. W. Rockmann, and M. G. Pratt, When should I trust my gut? Linking domain expertise to intuitive decision-making effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2012. 119(2): p. 187–194.

231. Lufityanto, G., C. Donkin, and J. Pearson, Measuring Intuition: Nonconscious Emotional Information Boosts Decision Accuracy and Confidence. Psychological Science, 2016. 27(5): p. 622–634.

232. Rescher, N., Choice Without Preference: A Study of the History and of the Logic of the Problem of» Buridan Ass«. 1960: Kölner Universitätsverlag.

233. Speier, C., J. Valacich, and I. Vessey, The Influence of Task Interruption on Individual Decision Making: An Information Overload Perspective. Decision Sciences, 1999. 30: p. 337–360.

234. Ciraolo, L. J. and J. L. Seidel, Magic and Divination in the Ancient World. 2002: Brill.

235. Frede, D., Der ›Übermensch‹ in der politischen Philosophie des Aristoteles: Zum Verhältnis von bios theoretikos und bios praktikos. Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 1998: p. 259–284.

236. Twenge, J., L. Zhang, and C. Im, It’s Beyond My Control: A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Increasing Externality in Locus of Control, 1960–2002. Personality and social psychology review: an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 2004. 8: p. 308 – 19.

237. Hafenbrack, A. and K. Vohs, Mindfulness Meditation Impairs Task Motivation but Not Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2018. 147.

238. Sio, U. N. and T. C. Ormerod, Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 2009. 135(1): p. 94–120.

239. Christoff, K., et al., Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2016. 17(11): p. 718–731.

240. Polt, G., Ich sinnlose vor mich hin [2011 47_11]; https://sz-magazin.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/ich-sinnlose-vor-mich-hin-und-das-mit-begeisterung-78621.

241. Carus, T. L., De rerum natura: Edidit Marcus Deufert (Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana) ed. M. Deufert. 2019: De Gruyter.

242. Maddux, W. W. and A. D. Galinsky, Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009. 96(5): p. 1047–1061.

243. Guth, R. A., In secret hideaway, Bill Gates ponders Microsoft’s future, in The Wall Street Journal. 2005.

244. Bloch, R. L., My Warren Buffett Bible: A Short and Simple Guide to Rational Investing: 284 Quotes from the World’s Most Successful Investor. 2016: Little, Brown Book Group Limited.

245. Seele, K., Beim Denken gehen, beim Gehen denken: Die Peripatetische Unterrichtsmethode. 2012: LIT.

246. Oppezzo, M. and D. L. Schwartz, Give your ideas some legs: The positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014. 40(4): p. 1142–1152.

247. Currey, M., Daily Rituals: How Great Minds Make Time, Find Inspiration, and Get to Work. 2014: Pan Macmillan.

248. Kross, E., et al., Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: how you do it matters. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2014. 106(2): p. 304–24.

249. Rateliff, J. D. and J. R. R. Tolkien, The History of the Hobbit. 2008: HarperCollins.

250. von Albrecht, M., Ovids Metamorphosen: Texte, Themen, Illustrationen. 2014: Isd.

251. Görner, R. and F. Schiller, Schillers Apfel: Szenen, Gedanken und Bilder zu Schillers 250. Geburtstag. 2009: Berlin University Press.

252. Yu, C. and L. B. Smith, What you learn is what you see: using eye movements to study infant cross-situational word learning. Developmental science, 2011. 14(2): p. 165–180.

253. Reinhard, U., Freizeit Monitor 2018, in Forschung Aktuell, S.f. Zukunftsfragen, Editor. 2018, Stiftung für Zukunftsfragen.

254. McDaniel, B. T. and J. S. Radesky, Technoference: longitudinal associations between parent technology use, parenting stress, and child behavior problems. Pediatric Research, 2018. 84(2): p. 210–218.

255. Klovert, H. and A. Martin, Emil und die nervigen Smartphones, in Spiegel. 2018.

256. Wass, S., K. Porayska-Pomsta, and M. H. Johnson, Training attentional control in infancy. Current biology: CB, 2011. 21(18): p. 1543–1547.

257. Diamond, A., et al., Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 2007. 318(5855): p. 1387–8.

258. Duckworth, A. L. and M. E. P. Seligman, Self-Discipline Outdoes IQ in Predicting Academic Performance of Adolescents. Psychological Science, 2005. 16(12): p. 939–944.

259. Blair, C. and R. P. Razza, Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Dev, 2007. 78(2): p. 647–63.

260. Chacon, J., et al., Effects of classroom cell phone use on expected and actual learning. College student journal, 2012. 46: p. 323.

261. Beland, L.-P. and R. Murphy, Ill Communication: Technology, distraction & student performance. Labour Economics, 2016. 41: p. 61–76.

262. MPFS, KIM Studie 2018. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, 2019.

263. Egmond-Fröhlich, A. v., et al., Übermässiger Medienkonsum von Kindern und Jugendlichen: Risiken für Psyche und Körper. Dtsch Ärztebl Int, 2007. 104(38): p. A-2560.

264. Wade, S. E., Adoleseents, Creativity, and Media: An Exploratory Study. American Behavioral Scientist, 1971. 14(3): p. 341–351.

265. Vandewater, E. A., D. S. Bickham, and J. H. Lee, Time well spent? Relating television use to children’s free-time activities. Pediatrics, 2006. 117(2): p. e181–91.

266. Hirsh-Pasek, K., et al., A Mandate for Playful Learning in Preschool: Presenting the Evidence. A Mandate for Playful Learning in Preschool: Presenting the Evidence, 2010: p. 1–38.

267. Singer, D. G. and J. L. Singer, Handbook of Children and the Media. 2001: SAGE Publications.

268. Mogel, W., The Blessing of a Skinned Knee: Using Timeless Teachings to Raise Self-Reliant Children. 2001: Scribner.

269. Twenge, J. M. and W. K. Campbell, Increases in Positive Self-Views Among High School Students: Birth-Cohort Changes in Anticipated Performance, Self-Satisfaction, Self-Liking, and Self-Competence. Psychological Science, 2008. 19(11): p. 1082–1086.

270. Turkle, S., Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. 2011, New York, NY, US: Basic Books. xvii, 360-xvii, 360.

271. Watzlawick, P., Anleitung zum Unglücklichsein. 1983: Piper.