To Ron Holmes, Maxwell Shorter and Antony Wood
Fine fingers quiver;
A fragile body breathes:
A boat sliding across
Fathomless silent seas.
Few live for the sake of eternity.
But if the passing moment makes you anxious
Your lot is terror and your house precarious!
And alone, infinity, I read
Your primer:
Your wild leafless herbal –
Logarithm-table of prodigious roots.
Like poppies, your eyebrows
Open up a dangerous path.
Why am I in love like a janissary
With this tiny volatile red –
The pitiful crescent of your lips?
Angelic criminal, cheeky schoolboy,
Alongside the Gothic a villain:
He spat on the spider-like law –
Incomparable François Villon.
Aortas fill with blood.
A murmur resounds through the ranks:
– I was born in ’94,
I was born in ’92…
And, clutching the worn-out year of my birth,
Herded wholesale with the herd,
I whisper through anaemic lips:
I was born in the night of January the second and third
In the unreliable year
Of eighteen-ninety something or other,
And the centuries surround me with fire.
I think that the most difficult task in the world is the translation of verses, particularly of a true poet, in whose verses there is no discrepancy between the form and the content (or meaning) – both of them always new and but a bit different (with no great disparity between them) – and where the ego of the poet is always strikingly felt. Marina Tsvetayeva said she could write as Mandelshtam did but that she didn’t want to. She was a great poet but she was greatly mistaken. She could be influenced by Mayakovsky and Pasternak and remain Tsvetayeva because they were innovators and therefore easily aped. But Mandelshtam composed verses in tradition, which is far more difficult to imitate.
Mr Robert Lowell’s translations are very free; Mr Paul Celan’s into German also free. But both are a very far cry from the original text. As far as I know the translations of Mr Greene are the best I ever saw. I can’t give my opinion about the Italian translations, as I don’t know Italian as well as English, French and German. As for Elsa Triolet’s, they are as naïve and vulgar as she was.
Mandelshtam said that the contents are squeezed from the form as water from a sponge.[1] If the sponge is dry, there would be no moisture at all. So, to render the content – which Mr Greene has succeeded in doing – is to give, in a way, the form or harmony, the harmony which can’t be rendered in translation, the harmony which is quite simple and at the same time mysteriously complicated. Poetry is a mystery.