It Takes a Vil age
It happens so often that I, at least, cannot keep track of it.
A woman is only believed if and when other women come
forward to say the man or men raped them, too. The oddness
of this should be transparent: if I'm robbed and my neighbor
isn’t, I’m still robbed - there is no legal or social agreement
that in order for me, the victim of a robbery, to be believed,
the burglar has to have robbed my neighbors. As writer Chris
Matthews said, “There are banks that Willy Sut on didn’t rob. ”
I remember an early, ter ible case in which a woman with a
history of mental upheaval due to her father’s incestuous rape
of her was raped by her psychiatrist. She had no credibility,
as they say, and the jury was doing a full-tilt boogie toward
vindicating the accused.
No one noticed a famous character actor who came to the
trial every day. The actor sat quietly and used her formidable
skil to help herself disappear. As the case was heading to the
jury, which was going to acquit, the actor came forward:
exactly the same thing had happened to her - father-daughter
incest and rape by this same psychiatrist. The actor testified
and the media printed pictures of her. Because of the actor’s
117
Heartbreak
familiarity to a large audience and the obvious ter or she felt
in exposing herself, the jury did not find for the rapist. How
do I know that the ter or was real? I talked with her.
In that case what no one seemed to understand was why the
victim, raped twice now by persons who were supposed to
protect and care for her, raped twice now by figures of power
and authority, was unstable - of course she was. Since she had
no credibility precisely because of the ef ects of the two rapes
on her, she needed rescue by the actor. Once the actor testified,
there were other women prepared to testify, and it was because
of the other women waiting in the wings that the defense
collapsed. In fact, the psychiatrist knew by virtue of his learning and expertise that incested women were staggeringly vulnerable and easy to shame; he bet his reputation and
professional life that shame would shut them up no mat er
how egregious his sexual abuse of them.
It takes a vil age of women to nail a rapist. Some rapists of
children have molested or assaulted hundreds of children before
they are caught for their first offense. Rapists of adult women
are high-brow and low-brow, white trash and black trash,
cunning and brutal, smart and stupid; some are high achievers;
some are rich; some are famous. Since the woman is always
on trial - this time to be evaluated on her credibility - there
almost always needs to be more than one of her to attest to
the abuser’s predatory patterns.
This was one of the great roles that rape crisis centers played:
118
It Takes a Vil age
pat erns would emerge; women who could not bring themselves to go to the law could provide a lot of data on active rapists; even without appearing in court, the knowledge that
there were other victims might give a prosecutor some bal s
in bringing a case and trying to get a conviction for the one
woman, by definition not credible enough. In the early days,
it was still thought that women could not argue court cases,
so there were virtually no female prosecutors.
Each time the women’s movement achieves success in providing a way for a woman to speak out, in court or in the media, the prorape constituency lobbies against her: against her
credibility. It’s as if we’re going to have a vote on it, the new
reality TV: are we for her or against her? Is she a liar or - let’s
be kind - merely disturbed? In the United States it is increasingly common to have the lawyers defending the accused rapist on television talk shows. The victim is slimed; the jury pool is
contaminated; what happens to the woman after the trial is
lost; she’s gone, disappeared, as if her larynx had been ripped
out of her throat and even her shadow had been rent.
The credibility issue is gender specific: it’s amazing how
with al the rapes there are so few rapists. If one follows the
misogynistic reporting on rape, one has to conclude that maybe
there are five guys. The worst thing about a legal system that
puts the worth of the accused above the worth of the victim
is that the creep almost always looks clean: somebody’s father,
somebody’s brother, somebody’s son. Don’t you care? we used
119
Heartbreak
to ask; she’s somebody’s daughter, somebody’s sister. The
answer was unequivocal: no, we don’t give a fuck. Worse was
the saccharine sweetness of those who pretended to care about
somebody’s mother, somebody’s sister. I’ve heard at least a
dozen criminal defense lawyers say, “I have a sister; I have a
daughter; I have a wife.” The rapists they defend use the same
locution. They want us to believe that the problem is that this
one woman wasn’t raped and the accused didn’t do it. Even
though criminal defense lawyers will admit that they rarely
have innocent clients, each time the public takes the sucker
punch: I have a sister; he has a sister; see his pretty suit; look
at how wel groomed he is. Her, she’s a mess. Wel , yes, she’s
been raped; it kind of messes you up. Oh, now we’re playing
victim, are we? Advice to young women: try not to be his first,
because then there aren’t others to confirm your story. You
can’t earn credibility; you can’t buy it; you can’t fake it; and
you’re a fucking fool if you think you have any.
Hillary Rodham Clinton’s husband is so good at sliming
the women he’s abused - and he has had so much help - that
it might take two vil ages.
120
True Grit
Becoming a feminist - seeing women through the prism of
feminism - meant changing and developing a new stance. For
instance, I hate prisons, but the process of becoming a feminist made me face the fact that I thought some people should be in jail. Years later, after watching rapists and batterers go free
almost al the time, my pacifism would collapse like a glass
tower, leaving me with jagged cuts everywhere inside and out
and half-buried as well. I began to believe that the bad guys
should be executed - not by the state but by the victim, if she
desired, one shot to the head.
When I was still a baby feminist (this being the lingo of the
movement), I was asked to go and interview a felon named
Tommy Trantino, who had published a book of drawings and
stories called Unlock the Lock. The person who had asked me
to go thought that I could write something about Trantino
that might help to get him out.
I went to Rahway State Prison, a maximum-security prison
in New Jersey. I talked to Trantino in a small, transparent
room, almost al glass. I was surrounded by the prison population, not in lockdown. Trantino had been convicted of killing
121
Heartbreak
two cops. I read a lot about him before I went. The same
day on which he had kil ed the cops he had also beaten up a
couple of women.
I asked Trantino al the obvious questions, including “Did
you do it?” His response was that he didn’t remember. Then
I departed from the script. I said that I knew he had been in
jail a long time, but had he heard of the women’s movement
and what did he think of it? Hands in his pants pockets, he
spread his legs wide open and said, “Wel , I'm good with women
and I'm bad with women.” That was enough for me, but ever
the intrepid reporter I said that I had noted that he had beat
up two women on the day of the killings; did he think he
would stil beat up on women if he was out? His answer was
an equivocating no, but I heard yes as clear as church bel s on
a Sunday, and as far as I was concerned he could stay in jail
forever. I didn’t think that this was the right way to think, but
I couldn’t stop thinking it.
I began the Socratic course of discussing the problem with
my friends, stil mostly on the pacifist left. Everyone told me,
in different ways, that I had an obligation to help Trantino get
out: prison was the larger evil. Here I was, virtually overlooking the murders of the two policemen; but he hit those women, and I didn’t think there was anything to suggest that if or
when he was out he wouldn’t hit more women.
One weekend someone took me to a benefit for one of the
pacifist groups. I was so offended by the anti woman lyrics to
122
True Grit
a song that I got up and walked out. Someone else did, too.
We reached the pavement at approximately the same time.
“I have a question I'd like to ask you, ” I said to the stranger.
I then presented the Trantino problem, which was really
gnawing at me. “It sounds like you already know what you
want to do, ” he said. Yes, I nodded. “You want him to stay in,
right? ” “Yes, ” I said out loud. The man was John Stoltenberg,
and I've lived with him for nearly twenty-seven years. I called
up the friend who had asked me to write the piece and said I
couldn’t do it. I told her the true reason: the women, not the
police.
123
Anita
The same friend asked me to go talk with Anita Hoffman,
whose husband, Abbie, had just gone underground after being
busted for selling cocaine. I had donated some money to
Abbie’s defense fund and said he should just keep running.
I didn’t real y know why I was going to see Anita.
The apartment was small and crowded, distinguished only
by a television set the size of a smal country. Anita’s child with
Abbie, America, was playing. She and I sat on what was her
bed to talk.
She and Abbie had not been together for a while. It was
clear that she was poor. She said that she didn’t know what to
do, that a friend of Abbie’s had offered her work as a prostitute (“escort, ” high end of the line) and was put ing a lot of pressure on her. Abbie’s latest caper had left her destitute. This
guy was a friend of Abbie’s, so he had to be okay, right? She
had thought of doing organizing - poor, single mothers like
herself who had no political power in the system; but real y,
what was wrong with prostituting? She could earn a lot of
money and she was lonely. Honey, I thought, you don’t begin
to know what lonely is.
124
Anita
I told her about my own experiences in the trade, especial y
about the dissociation that was essential to doing the deed.
You had to separate your mind from your body. Your consciousness had to be hovering somewhere near the ceiling behind you or on the far side of the room watching your body.
No one got through it without having that happen. I also told
her that she’d begin to hate men; at first manipulating them
would seem like power, but eventually and inevitably the day
would come when one perceived them as coarse and brutal,
smel y, dirty bullies. She had said that she liked sex and that
she had had sex with the guy who was now trying to pimp
her. I told her that the sex with Abbie’s friend was a setup to
make her more pliant and that in prostituting one lost the
ability to feel, so if one liked sex it was the last thing, not the
first thing, that one should do. I told her that most people
thought that women prostituted in order to get money
for drugs, but it was the other way around; the prostitution
became so vile, so ugly, so hard, that drugs provided the only
soft: landing, a kind of embrace - and on the literal level they
took away the pain, physical and mental.
I didn’t see or talk to Anita again after that night, but the
friend who had asked me to go said that Anita had moved to
California and had a job as an editor. I don’t know if Anita
ever tried the prostituting, but if so I helped her get out fast
and if not I helped with that, too. I was lucky to have the
chance to talk with her, and I began to understand that my
125
Heartbreak
own experiences could have meaning for other women in
ways that mattered. I began to trust myself more.
126
Prisons
Perhaps because I came from the pacifist left, I had an intense
and abiding hatred for prisons (even though the U. S. prison
system was developed by the Quakers). After the publication
of Our Blood, I wrote a proposal for a book on prisons. I was
struck by the way prisons stayed the same through time and
place: the confinement of an individual in bad circumstances
with a sadistic edge and including al the prison rites of passage.
I was struck by how prisons were the only places in which men
were threatened with rape in a way analogous to the female
experience. I was struck by the common sadomasochistic
structure of the prison experience no mat er what the crime
or country or historical era. That proposal was rejected by a
slew of publishers. I found myself at a dead end.
But an odd redemption was at hand. I had noticed that in
al pornography one also found the prison as leitmotif, the
sexualization of confining and beating women, the ubiquitous
rape, the dominance and submission of the social world in
which women were literally and metaphorically imprisoned.
I decided to write on pornography because I could make
the same points - show the same inequities - as with prisons.
127
Heartbreak
Pornography and prisons were built on cruelty and brutalization; the demeaning of the human body as a form of punishment; the worthlessness of the individual human being; restraint, confinement, tying, whipping, branding, torture,
penetration, and kicking as commonplace ordeals. Each was a
social construction that could be different but was not; each
incorporated and exploited isolation, dominance and submission, humiliation, and dehumanization. In each the effort was to control a human being by attacking human dignity. In each
the guilt of the imprisoned provided a license to animalize
persons, which in turn led to a recognition of the ways in
which animals were misused outside the prison, outside the
pornography. Arguably (but not always), those in prison had
commit ed an offense; the offense of women in pornography was in being women. In both prisons and pornography, sadomasochism was a universal dynamic; there was no chance for reciprocity or mutuality or an equality of communication.
In prison populations and in pornography, the most
aggressive rapist was at the top of the social structure. In
prison populations gender was created by who got fucked; so,
too, in pornography. It amazed me that in pornography the
prison was recreated repeatedly as the sexual environment
most conducive to the rape of women.
The one dif erence, unbridgeable, intractable, between prisons
and pornography was that prisoners were not expected to like
128
Prisons
being in prison, whereas women were supposed to like each
and every abuse suffered in pornography.
129
Sister, Can You
Spare a Dime?
In 1983 Catharine A. MacKinnon and I drafted, and the City
of Minneapolis passed, a civil law that held pornographers
responsible for the sexual abuse associated with the making
and consuming of pornography If a woman or girl was forced
into making pornography or if a woman or girl was raped or
assaulted because of pornography, the pornographer or retailer
could be held responsible for civil damages. If a woman
was forced to view pornography (commonplace in situations
of domestic abuse), the person or institution (a school, for
instance) that forced her could be held responsible. The burden
of proof was on the victim. In addition, the law defined
pornography as sex discrimination; this meant that pornography helped to create and maintain the second-class status of women in society - that turning a woman into an object or
using her body in violent, sexual y explicit ways contributed
to the devaluing of women in every part of life. The pornography itself was defined in the statute as a series of concrete scenarios in which women were sexual y subordinated to men.
130
Sister, Can You Spare a Dime?
In 1984 I went with a group of activists and organizers to
the convention of the National Organization for Women in
order to get NOW’s support for this new approach to fighting
pornography.
The convention was held in New Orleans in a posh hotel.
Sonia Johnson, an activist especially associated with a radical
crusade to pass the Equal Rights Amendment, was running
for president of NOW, and she sur endered her time and space
so that I could address the convention on her behalf; our
understanding was that I would talk about pornography and
the new approach MacKinnon and I had developed.
It was a hot, hot city in every sense. Leaving the hotel one
saw the trafficking in women in virtually every venue along
Bourbon Street. The whole French Quarter, and Bourbon
Street in particular, was crowded with middle-aged men in
suits roving as if in gangs, dripping sweat, going from one sex
show to the next, searching for prostitutes and strippers.
In the hotel, NOW women were herded into caucuses and
divided into cliques. I'm a member of NOW, even though its
milksop politics deeply offend me. Now I was going to try to
persuade the members that they should pursue the difficult
and dangerous task of addressing pornography as a civil rights
issue for women.
It is hard to describe how insular NOW is. It is run on the
national level by women who want to play politics with the
big boys in Washington, D. C., where NOW’s national of ice
131
Heartbreak
is located. I had, over the years, spoken at ral ies and events
organized by many local NOW chapters al over the country.
On the local level, my experience with NOW was entirely
wonderful. The members were valiant women, often the sole
staf for battered women’s shelters and rape crisis centers,
often the only organized progressive group in a smal town or
city. I’ve never met better women or bet er feminists. Those
who run the nationally visible NOW are different in kind:
they stick to safe issues and mimic the politics and strategies
of professional political lobbyists.
Soon after I came back from Amsterdam, I spoke at a ral y
organized by the local NOW chapter in Washington, D. C. At
the time the burning issue was the Equal Rights Amendment,
a proposed amendment to the U. S. Constitution that would
have given women a basic right to equality. There was a lot
of of icial (national) NOW literature on the Equal Rights
Amendment that I saw for the first time in D. C. I couldn’t
understand why reading it made me question the ERA - a
question I had only on contact with national NOW, its literature and its spokespeople. But of course, I did understand - I just wasn’t schooled yet in the ways of this duplicitous feminist organization. The literature was al about how the ERA would benefit men. Guts were sorely lacking even back then.
A decade later, the organization was torn over pornography.
The big girls in the big of ice didn’t want to get their hands
dirty - the issue demanded at least an imagined descent down
132
Sister, Can You Spare a Dime?
the social ladder. Lots of local NOW activists were fully
engaged in the fight against pornography and brought those
politics to the convention. Then there were what I take to be
honorable women who believed the pornographers' propaganda that the civil rights approach would hurt freedom of speech. Then there were the women, a small but determined
group, who thought that equality meant women using
pornography in the same ways that men did. We wanted a
resolution from NOW supporting the civil rights approach.
We got it, but, speaking for myself, at great emotional cost.
NOW runs its meetings using Robert’s rules of order,
which is democracy at its most degraded. One had to know
whether to hold up a red poster or a green poster or a yellow
poster to be recognized by the chair to speak. I can’t even now
articulate the points of order involved. When I got home, I
dreamt about those posters for months.
A vote was held on whether I could speak for Sonia Johnson.
The women voted no. So much for free speech. In place of
addressing the whole convention, we organized a meeting to
which anyone interested could come. I was speaking, and in
the middle NOW cut off the electricity for the mike. More
free speech. I was in tears, real y. The woman who cut off the
juice and then physically repossessed the mike - just following
orders, she said - claimed that we had not followed the rules
for holding our meeting. We had, but never mind.
Then the most miraculous thing happened. We had a suite
133
Heartbreak
in the hotel, as did other subgroups of NOW, so that people
could come by, talk, pick up literature, find out for themselves
who we were and what we believed.
I was approached by a black woman who worked in the
hotel and asked if we would march down Bourbon Street
with the workers in the hotel and the local chapter of the
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now
(ACORN) to protest the pornography and prostitution so
densely located there. This woman might well have made my
bed that morning. It was an overwhelming mandate. Of
course we said yes and tried to get the NOW women to join,
which they pretty solidly refused to do.
New Orleans is like most other cities in the United States
in that the areas in which pornography and prostitution flourish are the areas in which poor people, largely people of color, live. We were being invited to stand up with them against the
parasitic exploitation of their lives, against the despoiling of
their living environment.
The group was poor. They took packages of paper plates,
wrote on the plates “No More Porn, ” and stuck the inscribed
plates up on storefronts and bars al along Bourbon Street.
Demonstrators also carried NOW logos. There were maybe a
hundred people marching (as opposed to the thousand or
so back in the hotel). I was privileged to speak out on the
street with my sisters, a bullhorn taking the place of a microphone.
134
Sister, Can You Spare a Dime?
Meanwhile someone in the leadership of NOW had called
the police to alert them to an illegal march, a march without
a permit. As our rally came to an end and we were marching
out of the French Quarter the police approached. We ran. They
ar ested one of us at the back of the line. He, an organizer
from Minneapolis, went to jail for the night, a martyr for the
feminist cause. And it became a bad feminist habit for the rich
to rat out the poor, turn on the poor, keep themselves divided
from the poor - no mixing with the dispossessed. The ladies
with the cash to go to New Orleans from other parts of the
country did not want to be mistaken for the downtrodden.
135
The Women
The first time a woman came up to me after a speech to say
that she had been in pornography was in Lincoln, Nebraska -
at a local NOW meeting in the heartland. I knew a lot about
pornography before I started writing Pornography: Men
Pos es ing Women because, as an intellectual, I had read a lot of
literary pornography and because, as a woman, I had prostituted. In pornography one found the map of male sexual dominance and one also found, as I said in a speech, “the
poor, the illiterate, mar ied women with no voice, women
forced into prostitution or kept from get ing out and women
raped, raped once, raped twice, raped more times than they
[could] count.”
Pornography brought me back to the world of my own
kind; I looked at a picture and I saw a live woman.
Some women were prostituted generation after generation
and, as one woman, a third-generation prostitute, said, “I’ve
done enough to raise a child and not make her a prostitute
and not make her a fourth generation. ”
I found pride - "I got a scar on my hand; you can’t real y
see it, but a guy tried to slice my throat, and I took the knife
136
The Women
from him and I stabbed him back. To this day I don’t know if
he’s dead, but I don’t care because he was trying to take my
life. ”
I found women whose whole lives were consumed by
pornography: “I’ve been involved in pornography al my life
until 1987. I was gang-raped, that’s how I conceived my
daughter, and she was born in a brothel in Cleveland, Ohio”;
the child “was beaten to death by a trick - she used to get beat
up a lot by tricks. I’ve often wondered if some of the physical
damage that was done to her simply [was because] maybe a
child’s body wasn’t meant to be used that way, you know.
Maybe babies aren’t meant to be anally penetrated by things
or snakes or bot les or by men’s penises, but I don’t know for
sure. I’m not really sure about that because that’s what my life
was. ”
This same woman has “films of pornography that was taken
of me from the time I was a baby until just a few years ago. ”
I even found women wanting something from the system:
“I wish that this system, the courts and, you know, our judicial system that’s supposed to be there to help would have done something earlier in our life. I wish they would have
done something earlier in our daughter’s life and I wish that
they would do something now. ”
Women in pornography and prostitution talked to me, and
I became responsible for what I heard. I listened; I wrote; I
learned. I do not know why so many women trusted me
137
Heartbreak
enough to speak to me, but underneath anything I write one
can hear the percussive sound of their heartbeats. If one has to
pick one kind of pedagogy over al others, I pick listening. It
breaks down prejudices and stereotypes; it widens self-imposed
limits; it takes one into another’s life, her hard times and, if
there is any, her joy, too. There are women whose whole lives
have been pornography and prostitution, and still they fight
to live.
The world gets meaner as prostitution and pornography are
legitimized. Now women are the slave population, an old
slavery with a new technology, cameras and camcorders. Smile;
say “bleed” instead of “cheese. ”
I’m tired, very weary, and I cry for my sisters. Tears get
them nothing, of course. One needs a generation of warriors
who can’t be tired out or bought of . Each woman needs to
take what she endures and turn it into action. With every tear,
accompanying it, one needs a knife to rip a predator apart;
with every wave of fatigue, one needs another platoon of
strong, tough women coming up over the horizon to take
more land, to make it safe for women. I’m willing to count the
inches. The pimps and rapists need to be dispossessed, forced
into a mangy exile; the women and children - the world’s true
orphans - need to be empowered, cosseted with respect and
dignity.
138
Counting
Are there really women who have to worry about a fourth
generation’s becoming prostitutes? How many are there? Are
there five, or 2, 000, or 20 million? Are they in one place - for
instance, the Pacific Northwest, where the woman I quoted
lives - or are they in some sociological stratum that can be isolated and studied, or are they al in Thailand or the Philippines or Albania? Are there too many or too few, because in either
case one need not feel responsible? Too many means it’s too
hard to do anything about it; too few means why bother. Is it
possible that there is one adult woman in the United States
who does not know whether or not a baby’s body should be
penetrated with an object, or are there so many that they
cannot be counted - only their form of saying "I don’t know”
comes in the guise of labeling the penetration "speech” or
“free speech”?
A few nights ago I heard the husband of a close friend on
television discussing antirape policies that he opposes at a
university. He said that he was willing to concede that rapes
did take place. How white of you, I thought bitterly, and then
I realized that his statement was a definition of “white” in
139
Heartbreak
motion - not even “white male” but white in a country built
on white ownership of blacks and white genocide of reds and
white-indentured servitude of Asians and women, including
white women, and brown migrant labor. He thought that
maybe 3 percent of women in the United States had been raped,
whereas the best research shows a quarter to a third. The male
interviewer agreed with this percentage pulled out of thin air:
it sounded right to both of them, and neither of them felt
required to fund a study or read the already existing research
material. Their authority was behind their number, and in the
United States authority is white. Whatever trouble these
two particular men have had in their lives, neither has had
to try to stop a fourth generation, their own child, from prostituting.
“I had two daughters from [him], ” said a different woman,
“and he introduced me into heroin and prostitution. I went
further into drugs and prostitution, and al my life the only
protection I ever had was my grandmother, and she died
when I was five years old. ” This woman spoke about other
males by whom she had children and was abused. She spoke
about her mother, who beat her up and closed her in dark
closets. It’s good that her grandmother was kind because her
grandfather wasn’t: “I can’t remember how old I was when
my grandfather started molesting me, but he continued to
rape me until I became pregnant at the age of thirteen. ” Can
one count how many women there are on our fingers and
140
Counting
toes, or does a bunch of us have to get together to have enough
fingers and toes, or would it take a small army of women to
get the right numbers?
There is another woman who was left in a garbage can
when she was six months old. She was born drunk and had to
be detoxified in her incubator. She was, in her own words,
“partially mentally retarded, ” “abandoned, ” and “raised in and
out of foster homes, ” some of which she says were good. She
had the chance to stay with a foster family but chose to be
with her father, since that was her idea of family. He was a
brute, good with his fists, and first raped her when, as a child,
she was taking a bath with her kid brother; and like many incest-
rapists, he’d rape her or make her perform sex acts and then
give her a child’s reward. “I just wanted him to be my father;
that’s al I wanted from him, ” she said. At twelve she was
stranger-raped. The stranger, a fairly talented pedophile, would
pick her up from school and talk with her. Eventual y he
slammed her against a garage and raped her: “Nobody had
ever talked to me about rape, so I figured he was just showing
me love like my father did. ” On having the rape discovered,
the girl was called no good, a whore, and shunned by her
family. “My father had taught me most of what I needed to
learn about pleasing men, ” she says. “There was a little bit more
that [the pimp] needed to teach me. So [the pimp] would
show me these videos, and I would copy on him what I saw
was going on in the videos, and that’s how I learned to be a
141
Heartbreak
prostitute. ” Her tricks were professional men. She worked in
good hotels until she found herself streetwalking. “I ended up
back in prostitution. I worked out on Fourth Street, which is
the strip, and St. Carlos in San Jose. There were [many] times
that I would get raped or beat up. ” Daddy pimped.
One night she was trying to bring home her quota of
money when a drug-friend of her father’s came by. “He raped
me, he beat me up, he held a gun [in] his hand [to my head].
And I swear to this day I can stil hear that gun clicking. ”
She then worries that she is taking up too much of my time.
I’m important; she’s not. My time matters; hers doesn’t. My
life matters; hers does not. From her point of view, from the
reality of her experience, I embody wealth. I speak and some
people listen. I write and one way or another the books get
published from the United States and Great Britain to Japan
and Korea. There is a splendidness to my seeming importance,
especial y because once parts of my life were a lot like parts of
hers. How many of her are there? On my own I’ve counted
quite a few.
These women are proud of me, and I don’t want to let them
down. I feel as if I’ve done nothing because I know that I
haven’t done enough. I haven’t changed or destabilized the
meaning of “white, ” nor could anyone alone. But writers
write alone even in the context of a political movement. I’ve
always seen my work as a purposeful series of provocations,
especially Pornography: Mlen Pos es ing Women, Ice and Fire,
142
Counting
Intercourse, and Mercy. In other books I’ve devoted myself to
the testimony of women who had no other voice. These
books include Let ers from a War Zone, currently being published in Croatia in its lonely trip around the world; the introduction to the second edition of Pornography: Men Pos es ing Women, which can also be found in Life and Death: Writings
on the Continuing War Against Women, a collection of essays;
and In Harm’s Way: The Pornography Civil Rights Hearings,
edited with Catharine A. MacKinnon and published by Harvard
University Press. I still don’t get to be white, because the
people who care about what I say have no social importance.
I’m saying that white gets to say, “Yes, it happened” or "No,
it didn’t. ” I’m saying that there are always either too many or
too few. I’m saying that I don’t count sheep at night; I see in
my mind instead the women I’ve met, I see their faces and I
can recollect their voices, and I wish I knew what to do, and
when people ask me why I'm such a hard-ass on pornography
it’s because pornography is the bible of sexual abuse; it is
chapter and verse; pornography is the law on what you do to
a woman when you want to have mean fun on her body and
she’s no one at al . No one does actually count her. She’s at the
bot om of the barrel. We’re al stil trying to tel the white guys
that too many - not too few - women get raped. Rape is the
screaming, burning, hideous top level of the rot en barrel,
acid-burned damage, what you see if you look at the surface
of violence against women. Rape plays a role in every form of
143
Heartbreak
sexual exploitation and abuse. Rape happens everywhere and
it happens al the time and to females of al ages. Rape is
inescapable for women. The act, the attempt, the threat - the
three dynamics of a rape culture - touch 100 percent of us.
144
Heartbreak
How did I become who I am? I have a heart easily hurt. I
believed that cruelty was most often caused by ignorance.
I thought that if everybody knew, everything would be different. I was a silly child who believed in the revolution. I was torn to pieces by segregation and Vietnam. Apartheid broke
my heart. Apartheid in Saudi Arabia still breaks my heart.
I don’t understand why every story about rising oil prices does
not come with an addendum about the domestic imprisonment of women in the Gulf states. I can’t be bought or intimidated because I’m already cut down the middle. I walk
with women whispering in my ears. Every time I cry there’s a
name at ached to each tear.
My ideology is simple and left: I believe in redistributing
the wealth; everyone should have food and health care, shelter
and safety; it’s not right to hurt and deprive people so that
they become prostitutes and thieves.
What I’ve learned is that women suffer from terrible shame
and the shame comes from having been complicit in abuse
because one wants to live. Middle-class women rarely understand how complicit they are unless they’ve experienced torture,
145
Heartbreak
usually in the home; prostituting women know that every
breath is bought by turning oneself inside out so that the
blood covers the skin; the skin is ripped; one watches the
world like a hunted animal on al fours in the darkest part of
every night.
There is nothing redemptive about pain.
Love requires an inner fragility that few women can afford.
Women want to be loved, not to love, because to be loved
requires nothing. Suppose that her love brought him into
existence and without it he is nothing.
Men are shits and take pride in it.
Only the toughest among women wil make the necessary
next moves, the revolutionary moves, and among prostituted
women one finds the toughest if not always the best. If prostituted women worked together to end male supremacy, it would end.
Surviving degradation is an ongoing process that gives you
rights, honor, and knowledge because you earn them; but it
also takes from you too much tenderness. One needs tenderness to love - not to be loved but to love.
I long to touch my sisters; I wish I could take away the
pain; I’ve heard so much heartbreak among us. I think I’ve
pretty much done what I can do; I’m empty; there’s not much
left, not inside me. I think that it’s bad to give up, but maybe
it’s not bad to rest, to sit in silence for a while. I’m told by my
friends that it’s not evil to rest. At the same time, as they
146
Heartbreak
know, there’s a child being pimped by her father with everyone around her either taking a piece of her or looking the other way. How can anyone rest, real y? What would make it
possible? I say to myself, Think about the fourth-generation
daughter who wasn’t a prostitute; think about her. I say,
Think about the woman who asked herself whether or not it
was bad to penetrate a baby with an object and figured out
that it might be; think about her. These are miracles, political
miracles, and there will be so many more. I think that there
will be many more.
147
Basics
Politics doesn’t run on miracles modest or divine, and the few
miracles there are have the quality of invisibility about them
because they happen to invisible people, those who have been
hurt too much, too often, too deep. There’s a jagged wound
that is in fact someone’s life, and any miracle is hidden precisely
because the wound is so egregious. The victims of any systematized brutality are discounted because others cannot bear to see, identify, or articulate the pain. When a rapist stomps on
your life, you are victimized, and although it is a social law in
our society that “victim” is a dirty word, it is also a true word,
a word that points one toward what one does not want to
know.
Women used to be identified as a group by what was presumed to be a biological wound - the vaginal slit, the place for penile penetration. There is a 2, 000 year history of the slit’s
defining the person. If a stranger can go from the outside
to the inside, the instrumentality of that action is the whole
purpose of the creature to whom it is done. That area of
the female body has hundreds of dirty names that serve as
synonyms.
148
Basics
The mystery is why the vagina is such a mystery. Any reference to one of the dirty names elicits sniggers and muted laughs. What are seen as the sexual parts of a woman’s body
are always jokes; anything nonsexual is trivial or trivialized.
For a prostitute, the whole body becomes the sexual part,
as if there were nothing human, only an anatomical use. She
gets to be dirty al over, and what is done to her gets to be
dirty al over. She is also a joke. None of the women I’ve met
in my life has been either dirty or a joke.
Feminists have good reasons for feeling tired. The backlash
against feminism has been deeply stupid. But first there is the
frontlash, the misogyny that saturates the gender system, so
that a woman is always less. The frontlash is the world the
way one knew it thirty-five years ago; there was no feminism
to stand against the enemies of women.
I often see the women’s movement referred to as one of the
most successful social change movements the world has yet
seen, and there is great truth in that. In some parts of the
Western world, fathers do not own their daughters under the
law; the fact that this has transmogrified into a commonplace
incest doesn’t change the accomplishment in rendering the
paterfamilias a nul ity in the old sense.
In most parts of the Western world, rape in marriage is now
il egal - it was not illegal thirty-five years ago.
In the United States, most women have paying jobs, even
though equal pay for equal work is a long way off; and
149
Heartbreak
although it is stil true that sexual harassment makes women
migrants in the labor market, the harassment itself is now
il egal and one can sue - one has a weapon.
Middle-class women keep battery a secret and in working-
and lower-class families battery is not suf iciently stigmatized;
nevertheless, there are new initiatives against both bat ery
and the batterer, and there wil be more, including the nearly
universal acceptance of a self-defense plea for killing a
bat erer.
The slime of woman hating comes now from the bot om,
oozing its way up the social scale. There is a class beneath
working and lower class that is entirely marginalized. It’s the
sex-for-money class, the whoring class, the pornography class,
the trafficked-woman class, the woman who is invisible almost
because one can see so much of her. Each inch of nakedness is
an inch of worthlessness and lack of social protection. The
world’s economies have taken to trafficking in women; the
woman with a few shekels is bet er off, they say, than the
woman with none. I know a few formerly prostituted women,
including myself, who disagree.
The women I’ve met are very often first raped, then pimped
inside their own families while they are still children. Their
bodies have no borders. Middle-class women, including middle-
class feminists, cannot imagine such marginality. It’s as if the
story is too weird, too ugly, too unsightly for an educated
woman to believe.
150
Basics
What comes along with every ef ort to stop the sexual
abuse of women is the denial that the sexual abuse is happening at al , and U. S. women should understand that William Jefferson Clinton and his enabler, the senator, have set women
back more than thirty-five years in this regard. Some women
are pushed up and some women are pushed down. It’s the
women who are down who are paying the freight for al the
rest; the women who have been pushed up even a smidge
have taken to acting as if everything is al right or wil be soon.
Their arguments are not with men or even with subgroups of
men, for instance, pimps. They smile and make nice with the
men. Their arguments are with me or other militants. Being a
militant simply requires fighting sexual abuse - the right of a
rapist, the right of a pimp, the right of a john, the right of an
incest-daddy to use or intimidate or coerce girls or women.
A young woman just out of college says that date rape does
not happen, and the media conspire to make her rich and
famous.
A woman of no intellectual distinction writes a 3, 000-page
book, or so it seems, and she is celebrated - she becomes rich
and famous.
The wealthy wife of a multimil ionaire writes longingly
about being a stay-at-home mother. Feminists, she says, have
made that too hard - as she pursues a golden career writing
(without talent) about how she wants to be home mopping
up infant vomit.
151
Heartbreak
A middle-class English feminist of ferocious mediocrity
spends her time charting the eating disorders of her betters.
They are not so evident on the landscape now, but there
were so-called feminists who published in Playboy, Hustler,
and Penthouse and penned direct attacks on feminists fighting
pornography and prostitution. There were women labeled
feminist who wrote pornographic scenarios in which the
so-called fantasies were the rape of other feminists, usually
named and sometimes drawn but always recognizable; one at
least has become a male through surgery - her head and heart
were always right there.
Making fun of the victims was even more commonplace
than making fun of the feminists fighting in behalf of those
who had been raped or prostituted.
It became an insult to be cal ed or considered a victim, even
when one had been victimized. The women in pornography
and prostitution had not been victimized just once or by a
stranger; more often the family tree was a poison tree - sexual
abuse grew on every branch. Only in the United States could
second-class citizens (women) be proud to disown the experiences of sisters (prostitutes), stand up for the predator, and minimize sexual abuse - this after thirty-five years spent
fighting for the victim’s right to live outside the dynamic of
exploitation. “If you’re ignorant to what’s going on around
you, ” said one former prostitute, "or haven’t got the education
to bring yourself out of that, you stay there. And so it
152
Basics
becomes from the little go-go dancer to the strip-tease dancer
to the glamorous effect to pornography, [and] coaxing other
women into doing the same thing because I was a strong
woman. Coming from a woman it sounds better, it comes
across better, and I didn’t realize I was doing it until I got the
chance to do some healing. In the long run I was being tricked
into it just like every other woman out there. ”
What does it mean if you cal yourself a feminist, have the
education, and act like a designer-special armed guard to keep
women prostituting?
It is true, I think, that at the beginning, in the early years,
feminists did not and could not imagine women hurting other
women on purpose - being so morally or politically cor upt.
The naivete was stunning; betrayal is always an easier choice.
One follows the patriarchal nar ative by blaming the incest-
mothers, the Chinese mothers who bound their daughters’
feet, the bad mothers in the fairy tales. One did not want to
fol ow the patriarchal nar ative. But is it not the political
responsibility of feminists to figure out the role of female-to-
female betrayal in upholding male supremacy? Isn’t that
necessary? And how can one do what is necessary if one is too
cowardly to face the truth?
The truth of a bad or incapacitated mother is a hard truth
to face. As one woman said, “I was forced to be the head of
the family because my mother couldn’t do it. She was in a
mental institution. ” Another woman said, “My mother was
153
Heartbreak
scared for men to be around [because] al my sisters were al
molested by this man, and so she protected us from him, but
a lady came in my life who seduced me and molested me also.
I was twelve, and I thought I was safe. ” So there she was, the
bad mother or the betraying mother or the incapacitated
mother or the unknowing mother; and each had her own sadness or ter or.
Not too many prostituting women got past twelve without
being sexual y abused, and not too many were childless, and
not too many lived lives as teenagers and adults without men
abusing them: “I was into drugs, in the limelights and the
glamorous life, and thought I was bet er than the whores on
the streets ’cause what I did was drove fancy cars and travel
around in airplanes, al this shit, but I was stil in the same pain
as everybody else, [and] instead of using men I started using
women for whatever my needs was. ” The media antifeminists
are not unlike the woman-using prostitutes and the strung-out
mothers - their venom goes in the direction of other women
because it is easier than taking on men. Is this ever going to
stop?
154
Immoral
People play life as if it’s a game, whereas each step is a real
step. The shock of being unable to control what happens,
especially the tragedies, overwhelms one. Someone dies;
someone leaves; someone lies. There is sickness, misery, loneliness, betrayal. One is alone not just at the end but al the time. One tries to camouflage pain and failure. One wants
to believe that poverty can be cured by wealth, cruelty by
kindness; but neither is true. The orphan is always an orphan.
The worst immorality is in apathy, a deadening of caring
about others, not because they have some special claim but
because they have no claim at al .
The worst immorality is in disinterest, indifference, so that
the lone person in pain has no importance; one need not feel
an urgency about rescuing the suffering person.
The worst immorality is in dressing up to go out in order
not to have to think about those who are hungry, without
shelter, without protection.
The worst immorality is in living a trivial life because one
is afraid to face any other kind of life - a despairing life or an
anguished life or a twisted and difficult life.
155
Heartbreak
The worst immorality is in living a mediocre life, because
kindness rises above mediocrity always, and not to be kind
locks one into an ethos of boredom and stupidity.
The worst immorality is in imitating those who give nothing.
The worst immorality is in conforming so that one fits in,
smart or fashionable, mock-heroic or the very best of the very
same.
The worst immorality is accepting the status quo because
one is afraid of gossip against oneself.
The worst immorality is in selling out simply because one
is afraid.
The worst immorality is a studied ignorance, a purposeful
refusal to see or know.
The worst immorality is living without ambition or work
or pushing the rest of us along.
The worst immorality is being timid when there is no
threat.
The worst immorality is refusing to push oneself where one
is afraid to go.
The worst immorality is not to love actively.
The worst immorality is to close down because heartbreak
has worn one down.
The worst immorality is to live according to rituals, rites of
passage that are predetermined and impersonal.
The worst immorality is to deny someone else dignity.
The worst immorality is to give in, give up.
156
Immoral
The worst immorality is to follow a road map of hate
drawn by white supremacists and male supremacists.
The worst immorality is to use another person’s body in the
passing of time.
The worst immorality is to inflict pain.
The worst immorality is to be careless with another
person’s heart and soul.
The worst immorality is to be stupid, because it’s easy
The worst immorality is to repudiate one’s own uniqueness
in order to fit in.
The worst immorality is to set one’s goals so low that one
must crawl to meet them.
The worst immorality is to hurt children.
The worst immorality is to use one’s strength to dominate
or control.
The worst immorality is to sur ender the essence of oneself
for love or money.
The worst immorality is to believe in nothing, do nothing,
achieve nothing.
The worst immoralities are but one, a single sin of human
nothingness and stupidity. “Do no harm” is the counterpoint
to apathy, indifference, and passive aggression; it is the fundamental moral imperative. “Do no harm” is the opposite of immoral. One must do something and at the same time do no
harm. “Do no harm” remains the hardest ethic.
157
Memory
Memory became political on the global scale when Holocaust
survivors had to remember in order to testify against Nazi war
criminals. It had always been political to articulate a crime
that had happened to one and name the criminal, but that had
been on a small scale: the family, the village, the local legal
system. Sometimes one remembered but made no accusation.
This was true with pogroms as well as rapes.
There have been Holocaust survivors who refused to
remember, and there is at least one known Holocaust survivor
who is a Holocaust denier.
It has been hard to get crimes against women recognized as
such. Rape was a crime against the father or husband, not the
victim herself. Incest was a privately protected right hidden
under the imperial robe of the patriarch. Prostitution was a
crime in which the prostitute was the criminal no mat er who
forced her, who hurt her, or how young she was in those first
days of rape without complicity. A woman’s memory was so
inconsequential that her word under oath meant nothing.
Now we have a kind of half-memory; one can remember
being raped, but remembering the name and face of the
158
Memory
rapist, saying the name aloud, pointing to the face, actually
compromises the victim’s claim. People are willing to cluck
empathetically over the horror of rape as long as they are not
made responsible for punishing the rapist.
Proust’s madeleine signifies the kind of memory one may
have. That memory may be baroque. A regular woman who
has been coerced had bet er have a very simple story to tell
and a rapist dripping with gold lame guilt instead of sweat.
A worker in a rape crisis center told me this story. It
happened down the street from where I live. A woman moved
into a new apartment on the parlor level, slightly elevated
from the street but not by much. She needed to have someone
come into her new apartment to install new windows. The
worker did most of the work but said that he needed a particular tool in order to finish. He said that he would be willing to come back that evening to finish the job. The woman was
grateful; after al , there is nothing quite as dangerously insecure
as an urban apartment near the ground floor with unlocked
windows. He came back; he beat and raped her. At the trial
his defense was that he had been her boyfriend, she had had
sex with him many times, she liked it rough, and as with the
other times this was not rape. She, of course, did not know
him at al .
The jury believed him, which is to say that they had reasonable doubt about her testimony. After al , she could not prove that he had not been her boyfriend, that she had never met
159
Heartbreak
him before that day. This scenario has to be the world’s worst
rape nightmare outside the context of torture and mass
murder. It was so simple for him.
The point is that once the victim can identify the predator,
once she says his name and goes to court, there is no empathy
for her, not on the part of al the good, civic-minded citizens
on the jury, not from the media reporting on the case (if they
do), not from men and women socializing in bars. She’s got
the mark of Cain on her; he does not. Al the sympathy tilts
toward him, and he has an unchangeable kind of credibility
with which he was born. To ruin his life with a charge of rape
is heinous - more heinous than the rape. No mat er how
many rapists go free, the society does not change the way the
scales of justice are weighted; he’s got a pound of gold by
virtue of being a male, and she’s got a pound of feathers. It
couldn’t be more equal.
People deal with hideous events in different ways, and one
way is to forget them. A forgotten event is not always sexual or
abusive. I worked very hard for years as a writer and feminist.
One night I had dinner with a distant cousin. “I remember when
you used to play the piano, ” she said. I didn’t remember that
fact of my life at al and had not for decades. My life had
changed so much, I had so little use for the memory, perhaps,
that I had forgot en the years of piano lessons and recitals.
I sat stunned. She was bewildered. She insisted: “Don’t you
remember? ” I was blank until she gave me some details. Then
160
Memory
I began to remember. In fact, she had remembered my life
as a pianist over a period of decades during which I had
forgot en it.
With sexual abuse, people remember and people forget. The
process of remembering can be slow, tormenting, sometimes
impossible. Aharon Appelfeld thanks the Holocaust survivors
who insisted on remembering when al he wanted to do was
forget. There are at least two Holocaust memoirs about forgetting, and if one can forget a concentration camp one can forget a rape. If one can forget as an adult, a child can surely forget.
I read some years ago about a study in which a mother
chimpanzee was fit ed with a harness that had knives sticking
out; her babies were released into her presence; trying to
embrace her they were cut; the more cut they were the more
they tried to hold tight to her; the more they were hurt the
more they wanted their mother. The research itself is repugnant, but the terrifying story of what happened during it strikes me as an accurate parable of a child’s love, blind love, and
desperate need. Remembering and forget ing are aspects of
needing and loving, not rulers of what the heart does or does
not know. Those who say children are lying when they
remember as adults abuse they endured as children are foolish
- as are those who think children categorically do not know
when they’ve been hurt.
I remember a lot of things that happened in my life.
Sometimes I wish I remembered every little thing. Sometimes
161
Heartbreak
I think that the best gift on dying would be if God gave one
that second between life and death in which to know everything al at once, al that one ever wanted to know. For myself, I’d include every fact of my own experience but especial y the
earliest years - and I'd like to know everything about my
parents, what they thought and what they dreamed. I'd like to
know our lineage al the way back, who my ancestors were
and what made them tick. I have a few questions about lovers
and friends, too. At the same time I want to know the truth
about the cel , the galaxy, the universe, where it began and
how it will end. I’d like to know what the sun is real y like -
it’s not just fire and cold spots - as much as I’d like to know
how there can be so much empty space inside a molecule.
I'd like to go back and redo my high school physics class and
real y master the language of mathematics. I’d like to know if
there is a God and what faith means. I’d like to know how
Shakespeare wrote from the inside out. I know that if there are
black holes in the universe, multiple personalities simply
cannot be impossible. In fact they have God’s mark al over
them as an elegant solution to a vile problem - children forced
to live in hel find ways to chop the hel up, a child becomes
plural, and each part of the plurality must handle some aspect
of the hel as if it’s got al of it. This is more complicated than
fragmenting a personality, but there is nothing difficult to
understand. The child becomes many children, and each has a
personality and work cut out for it; each personality helps the
162
Memory
child endure. What is difficult is how children are hurt, and
sometimes the denial of multiple personalities, which is, of
course, a denial of memory, is also a denial of sexual abuse.
The story isn’t simple enough to be believed by outsiders, but
the victim has found a way to survive. It’s miraculous, real y.
One ritual-abuse survivor with double-digit personalities told
me to think of her as a small army fighting for the rights of
women. I do.
A memoir, which this is, says: this is what my memory
insists on; this is what my memory will not let go; these
points of memory make me who I am, and al that others find
incomprehensible about me is explained by what’s in here.
I need to say that I don’t care about being understood; I want
my work to exist on its merits and not on the power of personality or celebrity. I have done this book because a lot of people asked me to, and I hope this work can serve as a kind
of bridge over which some girls and women can pass into
their own feminist work, perhaps more ambitious than mine
but never less ambitious, because that is too easy. I want
women to stop crimes against women. There I stand or fal .
163
Acknowledgments
This book owes everything to Elaine Markson. She wanted
me to write it and helped me at every step along the way.
I also want to thank Nikki Craft, Sal y Owen, Eva Dworkin,
Michael Moorcock, Linda Moorcock, Robin Morgan, John
Stoltenberg, Susan Hunter, Jane Manning, Sheri DiPelesi,
Louise Armstrong, Julie Bindell, Gail Abarbanel, Valerie
Harper, and Gretchen Langheld for their support.
I am grateful to David Evans, producer for the BBC1 series
Omnibus. I used testimony from the documentary done on my
work by David; he helped make the last third of this book
possible.
I am also grateful to my editor, Elizabeth Maguire, for her
useful suggestions and great enthusiasm. I thank her assistant,
William Morrison, and al the other folks at Basic Books for
their work in publishing Heartbreak.
164