Putin has weaponised the memory of the war against foreign powers too. He has defended the Hitler–Stalin Pact, offending Poland and the Baltic states; compared Ukraine’s nationalists to collaborators with the Nazis in the war; and criticised the British and Americans for failing to attend the celebrations in Moscow for the 75th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany. His harsh words on their absence (a ‘moral disgrace’ and ‘insult’ were both used in interviews) expressed the resentment long and deeply held by the Russians based on the idea spread by Soviet propagandists since the Cold War era that the Western allies had never adequately acknowledged the Soviet contribution to the victory (a resentment strengthened by the Western myth of the Second World War in which the British and Americans are seen as the heroes who defeated Germany, while the Soviet role is minimised).
The culmination of this state campaign to control the story of Russia came in 2015 with the opening in Moscow of the first of twenty permanent ‘My History’ parks. Spread across the country, the parks are multimedia exhibitions with internet resources widely used by schools. The exhibition halls are crowded with large groups of schoolchildren, college students and cadets from military academies. The Russian Church had first come up with the idea of the parks to promote a patriotic view of Russian history. In 2011 it had organised an exhibition in Moscow, ‘Orthodox Rus’, which became the model for the parks. Patriarch Kirill, the head of the Church, was a firm supporter of the Putin line on history, arguing that Russia need no longer dwell on the sins of the Soviet era, for which, he said, it had atoned. He expressed his hope that a positive assessment of the country’s history in school textbooks would help it overcome the Russian ‘syndrome of historical masochism’ – a sense of guilt and inferiority rooted in the country’s past.17
The main message of ‘My History’ is that Russia thrives when it is united by a strong leader, and when not, in times of civil war, it is vulnerable to invasion by hostile foreign powers, which are afraid of a powerful Russia and want to keep it weak or break it up. The need for a strong state to defend its borders is of paramount significance. The exhibition dwells on every opportunity to remind the Russians that throughout their country’s past – from the Mongols in the thirteenth century to the Poles and Swedes in the Times of Trouble, the British and the French in the nineteenth century, the allied intervention in the Civil War, and the Nazi invasion – its enemies have tried to destroy Russia by invading it.
Every chapter in the country’s story is told in a way to justify the ‘patriotic policies’ of the Putin government. Alexander Nevsky’s victories over the invading Swedes and Teutonic Knights serve as reminders of the ever-present need to ‘repel aggressions from the West’; his collaboration with the Mongols is hailed, in the words of Sergei Lavrov, Putin’s foreign minister, as the ‘foundation of the centuries-old traditions of Russian diplomacy’ to look east (read: to China) for assistance when the country is rejected by the West (read: Western sanctions against Russia).
Russia’s need for a strong leader is illustrated in the exhibits dedicated to Ivan IV, Peter the Great and Nicholas I, the tsar perhaps most favoured by Putin because of his stand against the West in his defence of ‘traditional Russian principles’ during the Crimean War. Modern Russia’s story is a simple one in this telling – a tale of greatness undermined by pro-Western ‘enemies’ within but restored by great leaders. The autocratic power of the Romanovs guaranteed the progress of the country for three centuries, until the ‘liberals’ of 1917, egged on by their Western allies, brought the Russian Empire to ruin. The people were divided, torn apart by civil war, but Stalin reunited them and made Russia strong again. The cycle was repeated in 1991: the state collapse was brought about by liberals, Gorbachev and Yeltsin, who were puppets of the West, but a Great Russia was rebuilt under Putin’s leadership.18 Thus ends the ‘My History’ version of the story of Russia.
It is a story many Russians want to hear – the over-fifties, in particular, whose outlook has been shaped by the history they were taught in Soviet schools. They resented the ‘besmirching’ of their country’s history in the glasnost period. They did not want to listen to moralising lectures about how ‘bad’ the Stalin era was. They thought otherwise. What they knew was the story of their parents’ lives, of the sacrifices they had made to build a better life for their children. Putin’s version of their history enabled them to feel good as Russians once again. Their fondness for the Soviet past is perhaps a natural reaction to the loss of welfare provisions and the growth of economic insecurity after 1991. Jobs, pensions, housing and health care were all guaranteed, albeit at a basic level, by the Soviet system. But pride in Soviet achievements is not limited to those who went through Soviet schools. Since Putin came to power, there has been a general rise in nostalgia for the Soviet Union – even among those who were not yet born when it collapsed. According to a 2020 poll by the Levada Centre, three-quarters of Russians believe that the Soviet era was the ‘greatest period’ in their country’s history.19 Over the past twenty years, polls have shown consistently that around half the population think that Stalin was a ‘great leader’.20
Such nostalgia is more broadly linked to the long afterlife of Soviet mentalities, which have been passed down to the young. This was the extraordinary finding of the Levada polling group. From surveys over many years, they discovered that the attitudes which they associated with the ‘Soviet personality’ (low material expectations, social conformism, intolerance of ethnic and sexual minorities, acceptance of authority, and so on) had not declined, as they had expected when they started out in 1991. On the contrary, such attitudes had become more pronounced and widespread in the population as a whole.21 Homo Sovieticus had not died out after the collapse of the Soviet Union: he was reborn in a new form.
We can see his reincarnation in common Russian attitudes to state violence in history. According to a 2007 poll, seven out of ten people thought that Dzerzhinsky, the founder of the Cheka, had ‘protected public order and civic life’. Only 7 per cent considered him a ‘murderer and executioner’. More disturbing was the survey’s finding that while nearly everyone was well informed about the mass repressions under Stalin – with most acknowledging that ‘between 10 and 30 million victims’ had been repressed unjustly – two-thirds of these same respondents still believed that Stalin had been positive for the country. Even with a knowledge of the millions who were killed, the Russians, it appears, continue to accept the Bolshevik idea that mass state violence can be justified.22
In the early 2010s, millions of Russians watched the TV show The Court of Time (Sud vremeni), in which figures and episodes from Russian history were judged in a mock trial with advocates presenting evidence, witnesses and a jury of the viewers who reached their verdict by voting on the telephone. The judgments which they reached do not hold out much hope for a change in Russian attitudes. Presented with the facts of Stalin’s war against the peasantry and the catastrophic effects of collectivisation, 78 per cent of the viewers still believed that his policies were justified (a ‘terrible necessity’) for Soviet industrialisation; only 22 per cent considered them a ‘crime’ against the peasantry. On other issues the figures were even more emphatic. Nine out of ten viewers thought that Stalin’s programme of industrialisation had saved the country; only one out of ten considered it an ‘unjustified rupture’ from the country’s past. On the Hitler–Stalin Pact, 91 per cent believed the Soviet version, rehabilitated by Putin, that it had been necessary to give the country time to prepare for war against Hitler; only 9 per cent thought it had enabled the Nazis to invade Poland and had thus led to the Second World War. On Gorbachev’s reforms, 93 per cent believed they had been a catastrophe, with more believing that his policy of glasnost had been a Western ‘information war’. As for Homo Sovieticus, it turned out he was deeply missed: 94 per cent of the audience agreed that the ‘Soviet personality’ was a ‘real historical accomplishment’. Only 6 per cent believed it was a myth.23
*
During his first term in office, Putin looked to further Russia’s integration with the West. In interviews he spelled out his vision of the country as ‘part of western European culture’, and said that he was open to the possibility of Russia joining NATO and the European Union. Everything depended on how Western institutions would respond, on how NATO, in particular, would act in regions where the Russians had security concerns, historic links and sensitivities, which, if offended or ignored, might provoke an aggressive response from Moscow. ‘We will strive to remain where geography and our spirit have placed us, but if we are pushed out,’ Putin warned, ‘we will be forced to seek other ties to strengthen ourselves.’ It was a recurring pattern running right through Russian history since at least the eighteenth century. Russia wanted to be part of Europe, to be treated with respect. But if it was rejected by the West’s leaders, or if they humiliated it, Russia would rebuild itself and arm itself against the West.
NATO and the EU missed an opportunity to end this historical cycle. Instead of trying to bring Russia into new security arrangements for Europe, NATO kept it isolated. The US and its North Atlantic allies acted as if the Cold War had been ‘won’ by them, and that Russia, the ‘defeated’ power, need not be consulted on the consequences of the Soviet collapse in regions where the Russians had historic interests. The effect of Western actions was to reinforce the Russians’ own resentments of the West. On the back of years of anti-Western propaganda during the Cold War it did not take a lot to persuade them that a hostile West refused to recognise their country as an equal and took advantage of its current weakness to diminish it. This was the basis on which Putin built his anti-Western ideology. Inside Russia it appealed to those who had lost out from the Soviet collapse (public sector employees, low and middle-ranking officials, workers in the old state industries) and who were struggling in the market-based economy imposed, as they saw it, by the West.
In the Kremlin’s version of events, the first Western insult to Russia was NATO’s unilateral intervention, without UN backing, on the side of the Kosovan Albanians in their war for independence against Serbia, Russia’s closest Balkan ally, during 1999. Fifteen hundred Serbians, half of them civilians, were killed by NATO aerial bombardment between March and June. Dismissing NATO’s claims that it had intervened to prevent the ethnic cleansing of Albanians by the Serbian Milošević regime, Moscow accused NATO of a ‘flagrant violation of the UN Charter’ to promote its interests in the Balkans, which Russia saw as its own ‘sphere of influence’. The Kremlin’s anger at this NATO challenge to its status in the Balkans was based on the myth of Russia’s Pan-Slav role, which, as we have seen, had often proved illusory (in the Crimean War, for example). But that myth was a real factor on the Russian side. It shaped the Kremlin’s attitudes and policies. NATO’s failure to recognise that fact was bound to sour its relations with Russia. NATO’s intervention, moreover, set a dangerous precedent. It would be used by Moscow to justify its wars in Georgia, Crimea and Ukraine.
The real rupture with the West came with NATO’s eastward expansion. In the Kremlin’s thinking it was linked to the spread of US-sponsored democratic movements in its sphere of influence that posed a threat to Russia’s ‘sovereign democracy’. In 1999, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland were granted NATO membership. Five years later, Bulgaria, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia also joined the alliance. Moscow saw this as a betrayal of a verbal promise made by the Americans on the collapse of the Berlin Wall that NATO would not advance ‘even one inch to the east’. Many on the US side denied giving such a guarantee, or argued that it had been meant for eastern Germany, not for all the Warsaw Pact countries. They argued that the newly independent states of eastern Europe deserved NATO protection from the threat of Russian aggression, even if a promise of some sort had been made by other leaders in the West (in 1991, for example, Douglas Hurd, the British foreign secretary, had assured Moscow that there ‘were no plans in NATO to include the countries of eastern and central Europe in NATO in one form or another’).24 Whatever the reality, NATO’s eastward expansion poisoned its relations with Russia. George Kennan, who had shaped the Cold War policy of Soviet containment in 1946, warned that it would be a ‘tragic mistake’ to encroach on the territories of the former Warsaw Pact. ‘It shows so little understanding of Russian history,’ he told the New York Times in 1998. ‘Of course there is going to be a bad reaction from Russia, and then [the NATO expanders] will say that we always told you that is how the Russians are – but this is just wrong.’25
That indeed is how events turned out. NATO’s incorporation of the former Soviet satellites made it come across as an anti-Russian alliance, reinforcing age-old Russian feelings of resentment of the West. Putin voiced these resentments in a blistering attack on US global domination and its unchecked use of force in international relations at the annual Munich Security Conference on 10 February 2007. NATO’s eastward expansion was ‘a serious provocation’ against Russia, a betrayal of international agreements. He warned that Russia, as a consequence, would no longer play by the old international rules in furthering its interests.26 By provoking Russian aggression, NATO had created the very problem it was meant to counteract. It was as if it needed an aggressive Russia to justify its existence.
Estonia was the first to feel the pushback from Russia two months after Putin’s speech. The Estonian government’s removal of a Soviet war monument in Tallinn prompted Russian hackers (probably connected to the FSB) to launch a cyberwar against the Baltic state. Georgia felt the force of Russia next. Its aspiration to join NATO had been welcomed by the NATO conference in Bucharest in April 2008. But in August of that year it became embroiled in fighting against pro-Russian separatists in the breakaway enclaves of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, causing refugees to flee to neighbouring Russia. Moscow sent in planes and tanks to push the Georgian forces back, occupying a large chunk of Georgian territory, before declaring Russia’s recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states. President Medvedev, Putin’s placeman, justified the intervention by citing the precedent of NATO’s support for independent Kosovo. ‘In international relations you cannot have one rule for some and another rule for others,’ he warned the Americans. Russia’s show of strength put an end to Georgia’s NATO hopes (the alliance would not admit a country under partial occupation by Russian troops). It also showed the weakness of the West, which condemned the invasion but obviously had no intention of opposing it by military means.
Putin returned for a third term as president in 2012. The economy was doing well, boosted by an all-time high in oil and natural gas prices, the country’s main exports. Despite mass protests against election rigging, or perhaps because of them, Putin struck a more assertive foreign policy. He spoke of the need for Russia to restore its influence in what he called the ‘Russian world’ (Russkii mir), a concept he attached to the defence of ‘traditional Russian values’ within the borders of the former Soviet Union. The ‘Russian world’ idea had been advanced by the patriarch of the Orthodox Church to promote its spiritual inheritance from Kievan Rus, a link broken by the break-up of the Soviet Union. It was seized on by Putin, who used it as an arm of his foreign policy from 2012. The ‘Russian world’, he said, was a ‘family’ of Slavs, the Russians, the Ukrainians and the Belarusians, who shared a common history, religion and cultural inheritance from Kievan Rus. This world had been torn apart by the collapse of the Soviet Union, the ‘greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the [twentieth] century’, as he had described it in a 2005 address. ‘As for the Russian nation,’ he went on, ‘it became a real drama. Tens of millions of our citizens and compatriots found themselves outside the territory of Russia.’27
From the concept of the ‘Russian world’ it was but a short step to the Pan-Slav ideologies of the nineteenth-century Slavophiles, from whom Putin drew increasingly in the formulation of his foreign policies. The Slavophiles had argued that Russia should be seen as a ‘spiritual civilisation’ broader than its territorial boundaries. They had called on Nicholas I to stand up to the West in the defence of the Orthodox in the Balkans and the Holy Lands during the events that led to the Crimean War. It was the sacred duty of the tsar, they said, to promote the interests of the Orthodox abroad. Starting from that principle, Putin argued that it was the mission of the Russian state to defend the ‘tens of millions of our [sic] citizens’ who had been stranded outside Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Where religion had served as the pretext for Nicholas I to interfere in Ottoman affairs, language served as the president’s excuse to intervene in former Soviet countries where Russian-speakers formed a large minority. The fact that they were citizens of foreign sovereign states, and identified themselves as such, did not count in Putin’s view.
Like the Slavophiles, Putin envisaged Russia as a supranational ‘civilisation’, defined by its spiritual values, opposed fundamentally to the secular and liberal influences of the West. His thinking here was possibly derived from Danilevsky’s Russia and Europe, written in the wake of the Crimean War, in which the Pan-Slav thinker had maintained that Russia was a distinctive multi-cultural civilisation, neither understood nor recognised by Europe, which saw it only as an aggressor state and wanted to diminish it. Russia was not part of Europe, Danilevsky argued, and should not seek its approval or measure its own progress by its ‘universal’ principles, which were in fact self-serving, a means for Europe to impose its values on other civilisations. Following the West could only weaken Russia, which should stand against it if it wanted to defend its own conservative and religious traditions.
Other thinkers also shaped his idea of the Russian world. The one most often cited as the ‘key’ to Putin’s ideology is Ivan Ilyin (1883–1954), the White emigré philosopher, monarchist and fascist sympathiser, whose mystical ideas of Russia’s soul and statehood influenced a wide range of Russian nationalists after 1991. More than any other country in the world, Ilyin argued, Russia had a ‘heavy cross to bear’ on account of its harsh climate, its vast land mass to defend and its history of suffering; but it had emerged from these ordeals with a special spiritual strength, a capacity for love and selfless sacrifice, which, if mastered by a ‘national dictator’, would liberate it from the Bolsheviks and lead to its national renewal as a holy empire in Eurasia. Ilyin’s ideas were heavily promoted by the Church as part of its agenda to reconnect the story of post-Soviet Russia to the lost histories of the White and monarchist movements. In 2005 it organised the repatriation of Ilyin’s remains from Switzerland and reburied them, along with bones of the White army general Denikin, in Moscow’s Donskoi Monastery. Ilyin’s mystical ideas were disseminated in a simpler form for Putin’s cause by Alexander Dugin, a professor of philosophy at Moscow University, whose most influential book, The Foundations of Geopolitics (1997), was used as a textbook in the Academy of the Russian army’s General Staff. It mapped out a hybrid warfare strategy (combining political subversion, the weaponisation of Russian gas and oil, cyberwar and military force) to rebuild a Russian Empire in Eurasia, totalitarian in character, which would build alliances based on the rejection of the Western liberal order and US global domination.
Ukraine soon became the battlefield for this ‘clash of civilisations’ between Russia and the West. Although the Putin government had many times declared its recognition of Ukrainian sovereignty, it never really came round to accepting it. In Putin’s view Ukraine had occupied the borderlands of ‘historical’ or ‘greater’ Russia since the times of Kievan Rus. It was an inseparable part of the ‘Russian world’. Too many families, communities, were made up of both Russians and Ukrainians; the economies of the two countries were too integrated to be pulled apart. Russia’s gas was piped to Europe through Ukraine. Its most important naval base was at Sevastopol in the Crimea, a mainly Russian territory assigned to the Ukrainian Soviet Republic by Khrushchev in 1954 to mark the tercentenary of Russia’s union with the Cossack hetmanate. Little significance had been attached to Khrushchev’s gift. There were no national boundaries in the Soviet Union. But after 1991 the loss of the Crimea was sorely felt by the Russians, who had spent their holidays at its resorts and learned at school that it was ‘theirs’. Sevastopol was a Hero City, one of only twelve that had been so honoured because of their wartime role in 1941–5. A quarter of a million Russians died in the Crimean War – another war in defence of the Orthodox against the West. Crimea was the birthplace of Russia’s Christianity, where Prince Vladimir had been baptised, the symbolic home of the ‘Russian soul’ – that, at least, was how it was presented by the propagandists of the ‘Russian world’.
Putin pursued a policy of keeping Ukraine weak, divided and dependent on Russia. He regarded Russia’s domination of Ukraine as a necessary measure to prevent its falling under Western influence. He feared Ukraine as a burgeoning democracy whose freedoms were a threat to his own authoritarian regime (the ‘Orange Revolution’ of 2004–5, in which mass protests had reversed the rigged election of the pro-Russian presidential candidate Yanukovich to secure the victory of Viktor Yushchenko, alarmed the Kremlin in particular). His strategy was reminiscent of tsarist policies towards Russia’s neighbouring states, especially the Ottoman Empire. The tsars had used their military might as a means of armed diplomacy. By threatening the sultan’s Balkan territories, and, if necessary, occupying them, they had forced him to concede to their demands in the Black Sea and the Holy Lands. Putin adopted the same tactics in Ukraine. Instead of the defence of the Orthodox abroad, the pretext used by the tsars to interfere in European Turkey, he invoked the defence of ‘the millions’ of former Russian citizens to justify his interference in Ukrainian affairs.
The Putin regime backed pro-Russian leaders in Ukraine, and made things hard for those who favoured closer integration with Europe. Divisions in Ukraine played into the Kremlin’s hands. There was a historical divide between the western regions, which had been part of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth and then the Austrian–Hungarian Empire, where Ukrainian was widely spoken, and the eastern regions of Ukraine, where Russian was the dominant language. Because of the Russian presence in the east, no government could take Ukraine too close to Europe without risking civil war; but the European outlook of the western provinces meant that realigning the country with Russia would be just as dangerous.
The delicate balance was upset by two developments. The first was Putin’s long-term plan, which gained momentum from 2012, to include Ukraine in a Eurasian Economic Union with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, among other countries of the former Soviet Union. Putin envisaged the Eurasian Union one day growing into something like the European Union under Russia’s leadership – a Eurasian bloc to counteract the West. The second was the outbreak of mass protests in Kiev and other west Ukrainian cities from the autumn of 2013. Occupying Maidan Square in Kiev, the demonstrators called on the Yanukovich government (elected fair and square in the 2010 elections) to sign an Association Agreement with the EU. Yanukovich had negotiated the agreement, only to suspend preparations for it under pressure from Moscow. Shooting at the crowds by unidentified snipers (probably special forces of the Yanukovich government) turned the protests into a revolution, the Maidan Revolution, watched by TV audiences around the world. By 22 February 2014, the protesters had gained control of Kiev. Yanukovich fled to east Ukraine, and later to Russia, while a caretaker government was formed in the Ukrainian parliament.
The Kremlin saw the revolution as an illegal coup by the opposition parties aided and abetted by the West. Putin later placed it in a long historical continuum of Western powers using Ukraine to attack Russia. The protesters were certainly encouraged by US and EU politicians – enough for the Putin government to make its propaganda claim. The Kremlin’s media outlets consistently referred to the interim Ukrainian government as a ‘junta’, backed by ‘neo-Nazis’ and ‘fascists’, an obvious propaganda tactic to appeal to Russian nationalist feelings rooted in the memory of the war when some Ukrainians had indeed been collaborators with the Germans. They accused the government of threatening ‘genocide’ against the Russians in Ukraine (an alarmist claim based on an ill-judged decision by the parliament in Kiev to repeal a law protecting Russian and other minority languages). The Kremlin’s version of events was readily believed by the mainly Russian-speakers of the Crimea. They staged mass protests against the new authorities in Kiev, many of them calling for a referendum on Crimea’s independence from Ukraine.
Seizing on the questionable parallel with Kosovo, where NATO’s intervention had secured the Albanians’ right to self-determination, the Kremlin launched a new Crimean War to defend what it claimed were the same rights for the Russians of the Crimea.28 At the end of February, Russian special forces occupied the peninsula, installed a pro-Russian government and oversaw a hurried referendum, declared illegal by the UN General Assembly, in which 97 per cent of the people voted for reunion with Russia. Even with a properly conducted plebiscite the same decision would have been reached by a large majority. But Putin did not need to play by international rules. He knew that NATO would not act to defend Ukrainian territory. Russian might had called its bluff.
The annexation of Crimea was broadly welcomed by the population in Russia. There was a sense that an unjust loss of Russian territory – a symbol of the loss of Russia’s empire and great-power status in the world – had been reversed. National pride had been restored.
Putin’s approval ratings reached an 80 per cent peak. This was the high point of the Putin leader cult. He had attained the status of a tsar, the embodiment of state power, above everyone and everything. People placed their trust in him, as they had in the myth of the ‘true’ or ‘holy tsar’, despite the foreign condemnation of the annexation and Western sanctions on Russia. Most believed the regime’s explanation for the economic downturn that followed, which it blamed on the sanctions to rally nationalist feelings for its ‘us against them’ cause against the West.
The sanctions were not strong enough to deter further Russian aggression against Ukraine. Ideas of the ‘Russian world’ had by this point assumed a firm hold on the Kremlin’s military policy, with presidential aides like Sergei Glazyev pushing for it to extend the war in the Donbass, where pro-Russian separatists were already fighting against Kiev, to stop Ukraine from turning into what he called a ‘neo-Nazi’ puppet state used by the Americans against Russia.29 Soon after the Crimean invasion Putin sent in military aid to the separatist fighters in the east, later reinforcing them with unbadged Russian troops (so-called volunteers) in a war that rumbled on for the next eight years, claiming 20,000 Russian and Ukrainian lives. The warring parties failed to reach agreement on the Minsk II Accords, a peace plan brokered by the Germans and the French under which Ukraine would regain its sovereignty in the disputed eastern areas, including its control of the border with Russia, while the Donbass would be given full autonomy in a more decentralised Ukraine.
All this time the West continued buying Russian fossil fuels. In ‘Londongrad’, a safe British haven for the oligarchs, law firms, bankers, tax consultants, art dealers and real estate agents carried on as usual as their money launderers. Four years after its invasion of Ukraine, Russia was allowed to host the 2018 FIFA World Cup, an event that seemed to mark its rehabilitation in the international community. As Putin watched the Russian team progress to the quarter-finals, he must have felt that he had got away with his aggression in Ukraine. The Russian economy had adapted to the sanctions and had largely recovered. Thanks to sales of oil and gas, the country’s foreign currency reserves had grown to $500 billion, the fourth largest in the world. It gave Putin the war chest he would need to go on fighting in Ukraine while maintaining living standards in Russia. He was not afraid of more sanctions. With Donald Trump in the White House, with the EU weakened by Brexit and with the support of right-wing populists in Hungary, France and Italy, he was surely counting on another weak response by the Western powers, should he decide to escalate the war.
That would depend on his assessment of the NATO threat to Russia in Ukraine. At the Bucharest conference in 2008, NATO had declared that, along with Georgia, Ukraine would become a member of the alliance once it met the necessary requirements (among them better measures to combat political corruption and ensure the rule of law). The declaration was opposed by several NATO leaders, especially the German chancellor Angela Merkel, who warned that it would be seen as a dangerous provocation by Russia. But George Bush forced the measure through. In his final months in the White House, he was desperate to leave a legacy of promoting US interests and democracy in the former Soviet Union. He was supported by the east European member states, which were most alarmed by Russia’s growing aggression. They saw Ukraine’s NATO membership as ‘an important historic opportunity to cage the bear’, in the words of Lech Wałęsa, the former Polish president.30
NATO’s involvement in Ukraine set alarm bells ringing in Moscow. After the invasion of the Crimea, the alliance gave $3 billion in military aid to the Ukrainian government, helped it to modernise its weaponry and trained its troops in joint exercises in Ukraine. The war had strengthened Ukraine’s national unity. But it also gave rise to a violent hatred of Russia reflected in the cult of Stepan Bandera, the Ukrainian nationalist leader who had fought on the Nazi side against the Soviet army in 1944–5. Bandera streets and squares were newly named. Statues of the partisan leader were erected in cities such as Lviv and Ternopil. The Bandera cult was a gift for Moscow’s propaganda about the threat of ‘Nazis’ in Ukraine.
Putin saw the role of NATO in Ukraine as a direct military threat. In an hour-long address to the Russian people on 21 February 2022, he claimed that Ukraine would ‘serve as an advanced bridgehead’ for NATO’s forces to attack Russia unless Moscow intervened. Under the guise of its training missions, NATO, he declared, was building bases in Ukrainian cities like Kharkiv, near the Russian border, from which its nuclear missiles could reach Moscow in a few minutes. ‘It is like a knife to our throat,’ he said.31 From a Western point of view this seemed mad and paranoid. NATO, after all, was a defensive alliance and had no reason to attack Russia. But as Putin saw it, it was the conclusion to be drawn from his reading of the history of Russia and Ukraine.
He explained his thinking in a long historical essay, ‘On the Historical Unity of the Ukrainians and the Russians’, published by the Kremlin in July 2021.32 At the time it was dismissed as a strange scholastic article written by a man obsessed with long-dead historical disputes without bearing on the current conflict in Ukraine. The esoteric influence of thinkers such as Dugin could be clearly seen in it. Now the essay can be read as Putin’s historical justification for the invasion, which he launched eight months later, in February 2022. In it Putin argued, yet again, that the Russians and Ukrainians were one nation, that Ukraine was a part of ‘greater Russia’ (an entity at times he equated with the Soviet Union and at times with its inner Slavic core) and, as such, had no real statehood of its own. At many points throughout its history, Putin continued, Ukraine had been used by hostile foreign states – the Swedes, the Poles, the Austrians and the Germans in the First World War, the allied powers in the Civil War – to attack Russia by encouraging the Ukrainians to believe the myth of their own independent nationhood. The West today, he claimed, was doing just the same.
Much of Putin’s anger was directed at the Bolsheviks, who, he claimed, had given the Ukrainians an artificial state when they formed the Soviet Union. The Ukrainian Soviet Republic had been granted New Russia, the Black Sea coastal districts from Odessa to Donetsk which had formed a province of the Russian Empire (Novorossiia) before 1917. Later, as we know, the Crimea was transferred to Ukraine as well. None of this had mattered when the USSR had existed, Putin said. But on the Soviet Union’s collapse (a consequence of Lenin’s ‘mistaken policy’ of granting the republics a right of secession) it meant that ‘historic Russian lands’ had been gained unjustly by Ukraine. In a clear threat to the Ukrainians, Putin claimed that, when it left the Soviet Union, Ukraine should have taken only what it had when it had joined in 1922 – the smaller rump state (without New Russia or the Crimea) claimed by the Ukrainians in 1917. It was an argument that had been made before by Russian nationalists, such as Solzhenitsyn, a major influence on Putin’s thinking after 1991. The loss of Ukraine was a bitter pill for nationalists of Putin’s generation to swallow. His inner circle of siloviki – the ‘men of force’ in charge of the military and state security – had all been in the KGB or the military at the time of the Soviet collapse. Having watched their bosses lose an empire, they were united by their determination to restore the ‘inner empire’ of Ukraine and Belarus. They blamed the Ukrainians for the break-up of the Soviet Union (their vote for independence had certainly delivered the coup de grâce) and resolved to punish them.
The Russians began their military build-up in March 2021. By December, over 100,000 troops were massed on the borders of Ukraine. At this point it appeared that they were meant to serve Putin’s armed diplomacy. The threat of war had exposed political divisions in Ukraine, with growing opposition to Zelensky’s handling of the crisis which Putin wanted to exploit. He demanded a written guarantee that Ukraine would never become part of NATO. He also wanted the alliance to remove the military assets it had deployed in eastern Europe since 1997, when NATO had agreed to station neither nuclear weapons nor military bases in the new member states. His ultimatum was rejected by the US secretary of state, Antony Blinken, who came out of a frosty meeting with Lavrov in Geneva, on 21 January 2022, able only to repeat the usual formula that ‘NATO is a defensive alliance and poses no threat to Russia.’ Putin saw it otherwise. A month later, he launched his invasion, claiming it was needed to prevent the threat to Russia posed by NATO in Ukraine.
Few people thought that he would launch a full-scale invasion. An incursion in the east, followed by a round of armed diplomacy, looked like the more reasonable scenario. But Putin by this point had become a victim of his own myths about the ‘Russian world’. He genuinely thought that he could conquer Kiev and ‘liberate’ Ukraine without serious resistance – a dangerous delusion that led him to attack on every front. His decision surprised even senior Kremlin officials. It must be explained by Putin’s isolation from reality. Terrified of Covid, he had spent the past two years in lockdown on his own in the Kremlin, seldom meeting anybody in person (even the President of Kazakhstan was made to spend two weeks in quarantine before Putin would see him). After twenty-two years in power, Putin had become an autocrat. No one dared to question him. He filled his offices with statues of the greatest tsars, with whom he compared himself. Hubris lay behind his reckless decision. He thought that he could score a quick and easy victory. His spies in Kiev had told him that Zelensky’s government would soon collapse: it had ruined the economy and lost the support of the Ukrainians, who would welcome Russia’s troops with open arms. They were too afraid to disillusion him by telling him the truth.
On 24 February, Russian forces moved into Ukraine from Belarus, from Russia in the east and from the Crimea in the south. Putin had expected his troops to be in Kiev within two days. A victory article celebrating the return of Ukraine to the ‘Russian world’ was published by mistake by RIANovosti, the state news agency, on 26 February, before being withdrawn from its site. The Russians failed to enter the Ukrainian capital. They underestimated the Ukrainians (a nation with the fighting spirit of the Cossacks in its blood) and the leadership of their president Zelensky, dressed in khaki, whose daily broadcasts gave his people self-belief and renewed strength in unity. Putin had denied that Ukraine was a nation, but his war against it had created one far more united than before.
Once their Blitzkrieg had been stalled, the Russians had no other plan to capture Kiev. They lacked the logistics to supply their forward units with sufficient ammunition, food, fuel, technical and medical support. The Russian army, it turned out, was not as good as people had thought. It relied on heavy firepower and on its sheer size to overwhelm its better-supplied and more agile opponents – a distinctly Russian way of fighting wars, as we have seen. The low morale of the conscript troops quickly became apparent. Many of those captured claimed they had not known that they would be fighting the Ukrainians; they had been told that they had come to liberate their fellow Slavs from the ‘Nazis’. As the invasion force became bogged down, it resorted to bombarding cities, targeting civilian areas, blocks of flats and even hospitals, tactics developed by the Russians in Chechnya and Syria. Millions of desperate Ukrainians chose to flee by car, by train, by any transport they could find to reach safety; others took to basements to survive as best they could. The Russians carried out a number of atrocities in towns such as Bucha and Irpin where they had been met, not with open arms, but with hatred and defiance from Ukrainian residents.
These war crimes may not amount to genocide, at least in its legal sense, an accusation made by the Ukrainians, whose memory of the Soviet terror-famine, the Holodomor, which has been declared a genocide by the Ukrainian parliament, leads them unsurprisingly to that opinion. The rhetoric denying the Ukrainians their nationhood is certainly a part of the legal concept of a genocide under international law. But the Russian actions on the ground, although set in motion by the Kremlin’s aim to remove that nation from the earth, have more to do with the post-imperial phenomenon, in which fallen empires take revenge on their former colonies. The Russian killings of civilians, their rapes of women and other acts of terror are driven not so much by the genocidal purpose of destroying the Ukrainians as a group than by the hateful urge to punish them, to make them pay in blood for their independence and freedoms, for their determination to be part of Europe, to be Ukrainians, and not subjects of the ‘Russian world’.
Unable to break through the Ukrainian defences around Kiev, in the first weeks of April the Russians withdrew from the north and regrouped their armies in the east, where they prepared for a big offensive on the steppe against the best, most battle-seasoned units of the Ukrainian army, the 40,000 men who stood between them and the central regions of Ukraine. The Russian aim was to encircle the Ukrainians, destroy their army and occupy the whole of the Donbass, thus securing a land bridge between Russia and the Crimea, if not taking all of east Ukraine. Putin, it was said, was hoping to announce a victory at the annual military parade in Moscow on 9 May, Victory Day, but at the time of writing (this book went to print on 20 April) that did not appear likely. The war looked set to last for a long time.
The Putin regime sees this as an ‘existential war’, to quote one of its senior advisers, Sergei Karaganov, who warned that it will go on making war until it is able to claim ‘a kind of a victory’.33 But how long can the Russians bear its costs? How many dead and wounded soldiers will they accept as the necessary sacrifice to achieve this ‘victory’? How many years of economic hardship can they bear? The regime likes to call upon the memory of 1941–5, when the cult of patriotic sacrifice played such an important role in the Soviet war effort, as we have seen. But today the Russians are no longer fighting for their motherland. No foreign power has invaded it. They are being made to fight on foreign soil for Putin’s myth about the ‘Russian world’. Is that worth the sacrifice, they might well ask?
The Kremlin has prepared the public for this war. For the past eight years its TV channels have been churning out the same old narrative about Ukraine as an evil agent of the West, full of Nazis, bent on the destruction of Russia. The message has been passed through schools and military academies, through the print media and through the weekly sermons of Patriarch Kirill, a major force behind this war (in his sermon on 6 March, the Day of Forgiveness in the Russian Orthodox calendar, he likened it to a crusade against the West whose liberal values involved celebrating the ‘sin’ of homosexuality in ‘gay pride parades’).34 Independent polls in early April suggested that three-quarters of the population support the ‘special military operation’, as the Kremlin calls the war. Such polls must be taken with a pinch of salt. People are unlikely to admit their doubts to pollsters when doing so may land them in prison. But the number is believable. A similar percentage of the population, mostly in the older age groups, depends solely on the television for its news. Without access to the internet and independent sources (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and the last independent radio and online TV stations were all closed down in the first weeks of the war) the narrative is hard for ordinary people to challenge. Putin’s narrative is all the more effective because it builds on Cold War myths, which for years had told a story of the West’s ‘fifth column’ drawn from the non-Russians in the Soviet Union. Putin is aware of the need to build his Ukraine-Nazi myth on these earlier narratives. On TV he condemns the ‘scum’ and ‘traitors’ who are more at home in Europe than in Russia, and threatens mass repressions against those ‘fifth columnists’, the ‘enemies’ of Russia, who oppose his policies. The impact of his Stalinesque discourse is, on the one hand, to encourage ‘loyal’ and ‘patriotic citizens’ to attack those speaking out against the war (attacks using violence and racist slurs, harassment and denunciations) and, on the other, to create a general atmosphere of mistrust, hate and fear, reminiscent of the Stalin years of terror, which frightens the majority into silence and complicity. This is a pattern of behaviour learned from Soviet history. The Russian people know from their collective memory, passed down through the generations, not to question the authorities, to avoid awkward moral issues, in short to accept what they are told.
How will this war end, and what sort of Russia will emerge from it? None of the possible scenarios bodes well for Russia or Ukraine. A military defeat for Russia is the first and least likely possibility, if a ‘victory’ for Ukraine means, as many of its leaders think it should, the expulsion of Russian troops from all its territories. Even in defeat, the Putin regime would probably survive, albeit in a more repressive form and more isolated from the international community. Putin one day will step down (he is rumoured to have cancer), but unless there is a revolution his system will continue under different leadership. With its domination of the media, its repressive forces and its reserves of foreign currency, the regime is too powerful, even for a mass-based opposition, such as we saw in support of the imprisoned leader Alexei Navalny, who tapped into a growing public mood of anger and frustration with government corruption in the late 2010s as general living standards remained low. As Russia’s story shows, the autocratic state has many times survived long periods of discontent. Society has been too weak, too divided and too disorganised to sustain an opposition movement, let alone a revolution, for long enough to bring about a change in the character of state power. Today the failure of democracy is rooted in the weakness of the public sphere. Thirty years after the collapse of the Communist dictatorship, Russia remains weak in all those institutions – genuine political parties, professional bodies, trade unions, consumer organisations, civic groups and residents’ associations – whose freedom of activity is the underpinning of democracy. The intelligentsia, which once assumed the role of the nation’s conscience, carries little influence today. The war has further weakened it, as tens of thousands of that caste (artists, academics, journalists, scientists and IT specialists) have fled abroad instead of opposing it at home. No doubt they are hoping to return to Russia soon. But that was the hope of the émigrés who left Russia after 1917, and very few of them returned.
The second possible scenario is a stalemate, a permanently frozen conflict in Ukraine, with Russian troops in the Donbass and the east but neither side prepared to stop the fighting, and no real basis for constructive peace talks as long as the Russians occupy these territories. Eight years of war have hardened the Ukrainians’ resolve not to compromise with the Russians. For even if they gave up lands for peace, what assurance could they have that Russia would not use these as a forward base to prepare a new attack? Nothing Putin says can be trusted. The Ukrainians are equally unlikely to give up on their aim of NATO membership, a key demand of the Russians. From 2019 that aim was enshrined in the Ukrainian constitution, so any decision to remove it would need to be approved by a national plebiscite or a vote in parliament, a process that would take ‘at least a year’ in Zelensky’s estimate. Yet with every passing week the likelihood of passing such a resolution will decline, as it becomes ever clearer that NATO membership is the only guarantee of Ukraine’s survival as an independent state (before the Russian invasion, 55 per cent of the population favoured joining NATO, but by the end of March that figure had risen to 72 per cent).35
In the end Ukraine will be forced to reach a compromise with the Kremlin. There is no other way to stop this war. The issue is to do so on terms best for Ukraine with international guarantees of its security. This means that the West must go on arming the Ukrainians until they gain the upper hand, if not complete victory. But how long can the West be counted on? For all its talk of ‘standing with Ukraine’, would it really risk a direct conflict with Russia, or suffer crippling shortages of oil and gas, should the Russians cut sales to the West? Putin will be counting on the weakening of the West’s resolve. He reckons that its people will grow tired of the war and become more concerned by their own problems. He has begun a war whose predictable effects (spiralling inflation, food shortages in the Middle East and North Africa, both reliant on Ukrainian grain, and mass immigration from these regions into Europe) are likely in the long term to destabilise democracies. Failing that, Putin is prepared to escalate the war, using nuclear weapons if needed, because he thinks that NATO will back down to avoid a direct confrontation with Russia. Such are the lengths to which he is prepared to go to force Ukraine back into the ‘Russian world’.
A Russian victory of some kind is the most likely outcome of this war, given the resources at the Kremlin’s disposal. But what sort of victory can be achieved? Even if the Russians settle for the whole of the Donbass as their ‘victory’, they will still be left with the problem of Ukrainian insurgency and civil disobedience, not to mention the huge cost of rebuilding cities which their armies have destroyed. The Russian economy will be further weakened by sanctions. It will be set back fifty years, returning in effect to Soviet-like conditions. Isolated from the West, Russia will be forced to pivot east, a turn accelerated by the war and welcomed by a number of the Kremlin’s ideologists, who believe that Russia’s future lies in a Eurasian bloc, opposed to Western liberal values and US global power, with China as its main ally. With only fossil fuels, precious metals and raw materials to offer the Chinese, Russia would become the junior partner in this new relationship. But with China it would represent a dangerous threat to the West’s interests in those regions of the world, from India to the Middle East, where nationalist movements and dictatorships are able to exploit their country’s grievances against the West. In the Kremlin’s understanding this is a war not just about Ukraine but about the ending of the US-dominated global order and economy by the growing power of Eurasia.
It is an unnecessary war, born from myths and Putin’s twisted readings of his country’s history. Unless it is soon stopped, it will destroy the best of Russia – those parts of its culture and society that have enriched Europe for a thousand years. The Russia that emerges from the war will be poorer, more unpredictable and more isolated in the world. It goes to show how dangerous myths can be when used by dictators to reinvent their country’s past.
Russia’s future is uncertain. But one thing is for sure: its history will never be the same again. The country’s past will be reinvented by the Russian state as its needs change, reimagined by its people as they look to redirect its course. It may seem now as if that story was destined to conclude with Putin’s reinvention of the Russian autocratic tradition. But it did not have to end that way. There were chapters in its history when Russia might have taken a more democratic path. It had strong traditions of self-rule in its medieval city republics, in the peasant commune and the Cossack hetmanates and not least in the zemstvos, which might have laid the basis for a more inclusive form of national government. There were moments when its rulers edged towards a constitutional reform, only for their liberal initiatives to be overturned by the current of events pushing Russia closer to the tragedy of 1917. And in the chaos of the revolution there were moments when the people were able to reshape the state in line with their old utopian dreams of social justice and freedom. The retelling of these stories must surely be a part of changing Russia’s destiny.
Notes
Abbreviations in the Notes
IRL RAN Institute of Russian Literature, Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg
NA National Archive, London
OR RNB Manuscript Division, Russian National Library, St Petersburg
RGASPI Russian State Archive of Social and Political History, Moscow
RGIA Russian State Historical Archive, St Petersburg
Introduction
1P.-A. Bodin, ‘The Monument to Grand Prince Vladimir in Moscow and the Problem of Conservatism’, in M. Suslov and D. Uzlaner (eds), Contemporary Russian Conservatism: Problems, Paradoxes and Perspectives (Leiden, 2019), p. 306.
2
3A. Timofeychev, ‘Moscow Monument to Prince Vladimir provokes ire in Kiev’, Russia Beyond the Headlines, 14 November 2016:
4
5G. Orwell, Nineteen EightyFour (London, 2003), p. 40. The words are the Party slogan of Oceania where the ‘mutability of the past’ is one of the ‘sacred principles’ (p. 31).
6S. Velychenko, ‘Tsarist Censorship and Ukrainian Historiography, 1828–1906’, Canadian-American Slavic Studies, vol. 23, no. 4 (1989), pp. 385–408.
7M. Cherniavsky, Tsar and People: Studies in Russian Myths (New Haven, 1961), p. 229.
8E. Rostovtsev and D. Sosnitskii, ‘Kniaz Vladimir Velikii kak natsional’nsyi geroi’, Dialog so Vremenem, issue 65 (2018), pp. 150–64.
9On the Ukrainian appropriation of the Vladimir cult in the late nineteenth century: H. Coleman, ‘From Kiev across All Russia: The 900th Anniversary of the Christianization of Rus’ and the Making of a National Saint in the Imperial Borderlands’, Ab Imperio, vol. 19, no. 4 (2018), pp. 95–129.
10S. Solov’ev, Istoriia Rossii s drevneishikh vremen, 6 vols (St Petersburg, n.d.), vol. 6, p. 339.
11E. Kantorowicz, The King’s Two Bodies (Princeton, 1957).
1 Origins
1See P. Geary, The Myth of Nations: The Medieval Origins of Europe (Princeton, 2002).
2Povest’ vremennykh let, ed. V. P. Adrianova-Peretts and D. S. Likhachev with revisions by M. B. Sverdlov (St Petersburg, 1996), p. 13.
3C. Jarman, River Kings: A New History of the Vikings from Scandinavia to the Silk Road (London, 2021), p. 190. On the identity of Rörik see: S. Coupland, ‘From Poachers to Gamekeepers: Scandinavian Warlords and Carolingian Kings’, Early Medieval Europe, vol. 7, no. 1 (2003), pp. 85–114.
4S. Franklin and J. Shepard, The Emergence of Rus, 750–1200 (London, 1996), pp. 317–19.
5J. Black, G.-F. Müller and the Imperial Russian Academy (Montreal, 1986), pp. 109–17; V. Fomin, ‘Lomonosov i Miller: uroki polemiki’, Voprosy Istorii, no. 8 (2005), pp. 21–35.
6Z. Harris and N. Ryan, ‘The Inconsistencies of History: Vikings and Rurik’, New Zealand Slavonic Journal, vol. 38 (2004), pp. 1115–16.
7N. Karamzin, Istoriia gosudarstva rossiiskogo, 3 vols (St Petersburg, 1842–3), vol. 1, p. 43.
8See e.g. J. Nielsen, ‘Boris Grekov and the Norman Question’, Scando-Slavica, vol. 27 (1981), pp. 69–92.
9N. Andreyev, ‘Pagan and Christian Elements in Old Russia’, Slavic Review, vol. 21, no. 1 (1962), p. 17.
10T. Noonan, ‘Why the Vikings First Came to Russia’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, New Series, vol. 34, no. 3 (1986), pp. 321–48; Franklin and Shepard, The Emergence of Rus, pp. 12–16.
11Harris and Ryan, ‘The Inconsistencies of History: Vikings and Rurik’, pp. 120–1.
12G. Jones, A History of the Vikings (Oxford, 2001), p. 164.
13See O. Pritsak, The Origin of Rus’ (Cambridge, Mass., 1981).
14J. Shepard, ‘The Origins of Rus’ (c. 900–1015)’, in M. Perrie (ed.), The Cambridge History of Russia, vol. 1: From Early Rus’ to 1689 (Cambridge, 2006), p. 51. On Khazar influence see: T. Noonan, ‘Khazaria as an Intermediary between Islam and Eastern Europe in the Second Half of the Ninth Century: The Numismatic Perspective’, Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, vol. 5 (1985), pp. 179–204.
15For this view see Pritsak, The Origin of Rus’.
16Franklin and Shepard, The Emergence of Rus, pp. 99–100, 140 ff., 170 ff.
17The Russian Primary Chronicle, trans. S. Cross and O. Sherbowitz-Wetzor (Cambridge, Mass., 1953), p. 198.
18D. Obolensky, Byzantium and the Slavs (New York, 1994), pp. 61–2.
19See A. Feldman, ‘ The Historiographical and Archaeological Evidence of Autonomy and Rebellion in Chersōn: A Defense of the Revisionist Analysis of Vladimir’s Baptism (987–989)’, MRes. Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2013.
20D. Obolensky, The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500–1453 (London, 1971).
21Obolensky, Byzantium and the Slavs, p. 101.
22S. Averintsev, ‘Visions of the Invisible: The Dual Nature of the Icon’, in R. Grierson (ed.), Gates of Mystery: The Art of Holy Russia (Fort Worth, Tex., 1993), p. 12.
23See R. Milner-Gulland, The Russians (Oxford, 1997), pp. 175–6.
24L. Ouspensky, ‘The Meaning and Language of Icons’, in L. Ouspensky and V. Lossky, The Meaning of Icons (New York, 1982), p. 42.
25See O. Figes and B. Kolonitskii, Interpreting the Russian Revolution: The Language and Symbols of 1917 (New Haven, 1999), pp. 74–5.
26M. Cherniavsky, Tsar and People: Studies in Russian Myths (New Haven, 1961), p. 6. See further, E. Reisman, ‘The Cult of Boris and Gleb: Remnant of a Varangian Tradition?’, Russian Review, vol. 37, no. 2 (1978), pp. 141–57; F. Sciacca, ‘In Imitation of Christ: Boris and Gleb and the Ritual Consecration of the Russian Land’, Slavic Review, vol. 49, no. 2 (1990), pp. 253–60; C. Halperin, ‘The Concept of the ruskaia zemlia and Medieval National Consciousness’, Nationalities Papers, vol. 8, no. 1 (1980), p. 80.
27O. Figes, Natasha’s Dance: A Cultural History of Russia (London, 2002), pp. 320–1.
28I. Stepanova, The Burial Dress of the Rus’ in the Upper Volga Region (Late 10th–13th Centuries) (Leiden, 2017), p. 4.
29N. Kollmann, ‘Collateral Succession in Kievan Rus’ ’, Harvard Ukrainian Studies, vol. 14, no. 3/4 (1990), pp. 377–87.
30Franklin and Shepard, The Emergence of Rus, pp. 367–9.
31D. Miller, ‘The Kievan Principality in the Century before the Mongol Invasion: An Inquiry into Recent Research and Interpretation’, Harvard Ukrainian Studies, vol. 10, no. 1/2 (1986), p. 222.
2 The Mongol Impact
1S. Zenkovsky (ed.), Medieval Russia’s Epics, Chronicles, and Tales (London, 1991), p. 196.
2See also U. Büntgen and N. Di Cosmo, ‘Climatic and Environmental Aspects of the Mongol Withdrawal from Hungary in 1242 CE’, Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1 (2016), which explains the retreat by shortages of resources.
3M. Favereau, The Horde: How the Mongols Changed the World (Cambridge, Mass., 2021), p. 51.
4Ibid., p. 202.
5David Miller, ‘Monumental Building as an Indicator of Economic Trends in Northern Rus’ in the Late Kievan and Mongol Periods, 1138–1462,’ American Historical Review, vol. 94, no. 2 (April 1989), pp. 360–90.
6L. Langer, ‘Muscovite Taxation and the Problem of Mongol Rule in Rus’, Russian History, vol. 34, nos. 1–4 (2007), p. 116.
7Ibid., p. 110.
8Zenkovsky, Medieval Russia’s Epics, p. 232; M. Cherniavsky, Tsar and People: Studies in Russian Myths (New Haven, 1961), pp. 18–22.
9J. Blum, Lord and Peasant in Russia: From the Ninth to the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, 1961), p. 106.
10G. Vernadsky, The Mongols and Russia, vol. 3: A History of Russia (New Haven, 1953), p. 378.
11J. Fennell, The Emergence of Moscow, 1304–1359 (London, 1968), pp. 82–9.
12Ibid., p. 192.
13Vernadsky, The Mongols, p. 260.
14‘The Scythians’ (1918) in A. Blok, Sobranie sochinenii v vos’mi tomakh (Moscow/Leningrad, 1961–3), vol. 3, p. 360.
15Ibid., p. 267.
16D. Ostrowski, Muscovy and the Mongols: Cross-Cultural Influences on the Steppe Frontier, 1304–1589 (Cambridge, 1998), p. 67.
17N. Karamzin, Istoriia gosudarstva rossiiskogo, 12 vols (St Petersburg, 1851–3), vol. 5, p. 373; D. Likhachev, Russkaya kul’tura (Moscow, 2000), p. 21.
18C. Halperin, The Tatar Yoke: The Image of the Mongols in Medieval Russia (Bloomington, Ind., 2009), p. 193.
19S. Solov’ev, Istoriia Rossii s drevneiskikh vremen, 29 vols (Moscow, 1851–79), vol. 4, p. 179.
20See C. Halperin, ‘Kliuchevskii and the Tatar Yoke’, Canadian-American Slavic Studies, vol. 34, no. 4 (2000), pp. 385–408.
21Favereau, The Horde, p. 238.
22Ostrowski, Muscovy and the Mongols, p. 56. See further, N. Baskakov, Russkie familii tiurksogo proiskhozhdeniia (Moscow, 1979).
23N. Trubetskoi, K probleme russkogo samopoznaniia (Paris, 1927), pp. 41–2, 48–51.
24Vernadsky, The Mongols, pp. 13, 391.
25H. Dewey and A. Kleimola, ‘Russian Collective Consciousness: The Kievan Roots’, Slavonic and East European Review, vol. 62, no. 2 (1984), pp. 180–91.
26G. Alef, ‘The Origin and Early Development of the Muscovite Postal Service’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, New Series, vol. 15, no. 1 (1967), p. 1.
27Ostrowski, Muscovy and the Mongols, p. 52.
28M. Cherniavsky, ‘Khan or Basileus: An Aspect of Russian Medieval Political Theory’, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 20 (1959), pp. 459–76.
29See D. Ostrowski, ‘The Mongol Origins of Muscovite Political Institutions’, Slavic Review, vol. 49, no. 4 (1990), pp. 525–42.
30Karamzin, Istoriia gosudarstva rossiiskogo, vol. 5, p. 374.
3 Tsar and God
1D. Miller, ‘The Coronation of Ivan IV of Moscow’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, New Series, vol. 15, no. 4 (1967), pp. 559–74.
2D. Ostrowski, Muscovy and the Mongols: Cross-Cultural Influences on the Steppe Frontier, 1304–1589 (Cambridge, 1998), pp. 171–7.
3D. Miller, ‘Creating Legitimacy: Ritual, Ideology, and Power in Sixteenth-Century Russia’, Russian History, vol. 21, no. 3 (1994), pp. 289–315.
4The classic work developing this thesis is E. Kantorowicz, The King’s Two Bodies (Princeton, 1957).
5G. Alef, ‘The Adoption of the Muscovite Two-Headed Eagle: A Discordant View’, Speculum, vol. 41, no. 1 (1966), pp. 1–21.
6J. Martin, Medieval Russia, 980–1584 (Cambridge, 2007), p. 261.
7The Correspondence between Prince A. M. Kurbsky and Tsar Ivan IV of Russia, 1564–1579, ed. and trans. J. Fennell (Cambridge, 1955), p. 75.
8S. von Herberstein, Notes upon Russia. Being a translation of the earliest account of that country, entitled Rerum Moscoviticarum Commentarii, trans. and ed. R. H. Major, 2 vols (London, 1851–2), vol. 1, p. 30.
9R. Pipes, Russia under the Old Regime (London, 1974), p. 97.
10T. Hunczak (ed.), Russian Imperialism from Ivan the Great to the Revolution (New Brunswick, 1974), p. ix.
11V. Kliuchevskii, Kurs russkoi istorii, 5 vols (Moscow, 1987), vol. 1, p. 31. The idea of Russia’s internal colonisation was originally advanced by Kliuchevsky’s teacher Soloviev in volume 2 of his Istoriia Rossii s drevneishchikh vremen (1851).
12M. Perrie and A. Pavlov, Ivan the Terrible (London, 2003), pp. 48–50.
13See R. Skrynnikov, ‘Ermak’s Siberian Expedition’, Russian History, vol. 13, no. 1 (1986), pp. 1–40.
14I. de Madariaga, Ivan the Terrible (New Haven, 2005), p. 353.
15C. Halperin, Ivan the Terrible: Free to Reward and Free to Punish (Pittsburgh, 2019), pp. 182–6.
16Madariaga, Ivan, pp. 257–9.
17Correspondence, p. 41.
18Perrie and Pavlov, Ivan, p. 159.
19See further, P. Hunt, ‘Ivan IV’s Personal Mythology of Kingship’, Slavic Review, vol. 52, no. 4 (1993), pp. 769–809.
20M. Cherniavsky, ‘Ivan the Terrible as Renaissance Prince’, Slavic Review, vol. 27, no. 2 (1968), pp. 195–211. For the comparison with Charlemagne: D. Rowland, ‘Ivan the Terrible as a Carolingian Renaissance Prince’, Harvard Ukrainian Studies, vol. 19 (1995), pp. 594–606.
21L. Kozlov, ‘The Artist and the Shadow of Ivan’, in Richard Taylor and D. W. Spring (eds), Stalinism and Soviet Cinema (London, 1993), p. 123.
22Moscow News, no. 32 (1988), p. 8.
4 Times of Trouble
1F. Fletcher, Of the Russe Common Wealth (London, 1591), p. 34.
2M. Cherniavsky, Tsar and People: Studies in Russian Myths (New Haven, 1961), p. 179.
3Ibid., pp. 114–17.
4P. Longworth, ‘The Pretender Phenomenon in Eighteenth-Century Russia’, Past & Present, vol. 66, issue 1 (1975), p. 61.
5M. Perrie, Pretenders and Popular Monarchism in Early Modern Russia (Cambridge, 1995), p. 131.
6C. Dunning, Russia’s First Civil War: The Time of Troubles and the Founding of the Romanov Dynasty (University Park, Pa., 2001), p. 302.
7The idea of a ‘general crisis’ in seventeenth-century Europe goes back to a 1954 essay by Eric Hobsbawm (‘The General Crisis of the European Economy in the 17th Century’, Past & Present, vol. 5, issue 1 [1954], pp. 33–53). It gave rise to a series of debates on the emergence of capitalism and the problems of the state. The most important essays are collected in G. Parker and L. Smith, The General Crisis of the Seventeenth Century (London, 1978). On the application of the ‘general crisis’ theory to Russia see: P. Brown, ‘Muscovy, Poland, and the Seventeenth Century Crisis’, Polish Review, vol. 27, no. 3/4 (1982), pp. 55–69.
8V. Kivelson, ‘The Devil Stole his Mind: The Tsar and the 1648 Moscow Uprising’, American Historical Review, vol. 98, no. 3 (1993), p. 744.
9V. Kliuchevsky, A Course in Russian History: The Seventeenth Century (New York, 1994), p. 152.
10Ibid., p. 755.
11R. Crummey, Aristocrats and Servitors: The Boyar Elite in Russia, 1613–1689 (Princeton, 1983), p. 36.
12A. Kleimola, ‘The Duty to Denounce in Muscovite Russia’, Slavic Review, vol. 31, no. 4 (1972), p. 773.
13R. Hellie, ‘The Stratification of Muscovite Society: The Townsmen’, Russian History, vol. 5, part 2 (1978), pp. 119–75.
14For the legal evolution of serfdom: R. Smith, The Enserfment of the Russian Peasantry (Cambridge, 1968).
15O. Figes, The Europeans: Three Lives and the Making of a Cosmopolitan Culture (London, 2019), p. 74.
16P. Avrich, Russian Rebels, 1600–1800 (New York, 1972), p. 109.
17P. Longworth, ‘The Subversive Legend of Stenka Razin’, in V. Strada (ed.), Russia (Turin, 1975), vol. 2, p. 29.
18S. O’Rourke, The Cossacks (Manchester, 2007), p. 82. On the pogroms of the Civil War, see J. Veitlinger, In the Midst of Civilized Europe: The Pogroms of 1918–1921 and the Onset of the Holocaust (New York, 2021).
19L. Hughes, Russia in the Age of Peter the Great (New Haven, 1998), p. 317.
20S. Collins, The Present State of Russia (London, 1671), pp. 64–5.
21Kliuchevsky, A Course, p. 343.
22L. Hughes, Sophia Regent of Russia, 1657–1704 (New Haven, 1990), p. 249.
5 Russia Faces West
1A. Schönle, ‘Calendar Reform under Peter the Great: Absolutist Prerogatives, Plural Temporalities, and Christian Exceptionalism’, Slavic Review, vol. 80, no. 1 (2021), pp. 69–89; L. Hughes, ‘Russian Culture in the Eighteenth Century’, in D. Lieven (ed.), The Cambridge History of Russia, vol. 2: Imperial Russia, 1689–1917 (Cambridge, 2006), p. 67.
2N. Riasanovsky, The Image of Peter the Great in Russian History and Thought (New York, 1985), p. 5.
3S. Montefiore, The Romanovs (London, 2016), p. 82.
4W. Fuller, ‘The Imperial Army’, in Lieven (ed.), Cambridge History of Russia, vol. 2, p. 532.
5Hughes, Russia in the Age of Peter the Great, p. 29.
6P. Bushkovitch, ‘Peter the Great and the Northern War’, in Lieven (ed.), The Cambridge History of Russia, vol. 2, p. 498. Translation changed for clarity.
7‘Peterburg v 1720 g. Zapiski poliaka-ochevidtsa’, Russkaya Starina, vol. 25 (1879), p. 267.
8S. Soloviev, Istoriia Rossii ot drevneishikh vremen, 29 vols (Moscow, 1864–79), vol. 13, p. 1270.
9On textile manufacturing: W. Daniel, ‘Entrepreneurship and the Russian Textile Industry: From Peter the Great to Catherine the Great’, Russian Review, vol. 54, no. 1 (1995), pp. 1–25.
10Iusnosti chestnoe zertsalo (St Petersburg, 1717), pp. 73–4.
11L. Tolstoy, War and Peace, trans. L. and A. Maude (Oxford, 1998), p. 3.
12Riasanovsky, Image, p. 80.
13Ibid., p. 60.
14V. Solov’ev, Sochineniia, 2 vols (Moscow, 1989), vol. 1, p. 287.
15S. Dixon, The Modernisation of Russia (Cambridge, 2012), p. 16.
16See further, B. Meehan-Waters, ‘Catherine the Great and the Problem of Female Rule’, Russian Review, vol. 34, no. 3 (1975), pp. 293–300.
17H. Rogger, National Consciousness in Eighteenth-Century Russia (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), p. 37.
18J. Alexander, Catherine the Great: Life and Legend (Oxford, 1989), pp. 11, 14.
19R. Ovchinnikov, ‘Sledstvie i sud nad E. I. Pugachevym’, Voprosy Istorii, no. 3 (1966), p. 128.
20R. Jones, The Emancipation of the Russian Nobility, 1762–1785 (Princeton, 2019), p. 204.
21P. Dukes (ed.), Russia under Catherine the Great, vol. 2: Catherine the Great’s Instruction (Nakaz) to the Legislative Commission, 1767 (Newtonville, Mass., 1977), p. 3.
22See M. Bassin, ‘Geographies of Imperial Identity’, in Lieven (ed.), Cambridge History of Russia, vol. 2, pp. 45–64.
23M. Bassin, ‘Inventing Siberia: Visions of the Russian East in the Early Nineteenth Century’, American Historical Review, vol. 96, no. 3 (1991), pp. 768–70.
24The number of Jews is hard to estimate with accuracy. It might have been as high as 200,000 or as low as 32,000. See J. Klier, Russia Gathers her Jews: The Origins of the ‘Jewish Question’ in Russia, 1772–1825 (DeKalb, Ill., 1986), p. 56.
25W. Reddaway (ed.), Documents of Catherine the Great (Cambridge, 1931), p. 147; Correspondance artistique de Grimm avec Catherine II, Archives de l’art français, nouvelle période, 17 (Paris, 1932), pp. 61–2.
26See further, O. Figes, Crimea: The Last Crusade (London, 2010), pp. 10–17.
27S. Montefiore, Prince of Princes: The Life of Potemkin (London, 2000), pp. 274–5.
28J. Blum, Lord and Peasant in Russia: From the Ninth to the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, 1961), p. 441.
29Jones, Emancipation of the Russian Nobility, p. 293.
30Alexander, Catherine, p. 283.
31V. Semennikov (ed.), Materialy dlia istorii russkoi literatury (St Petersburg, 1914), p. 34.
6 The Shadow of Napoleon
1M. Heller, Histoire de la Russie et de son empire (Paris, 1997), p. 616.
2A. Czartoryski, Mémoires et correspondance avec l’empereur Alexandre Ier, 2 vols (Paris, 1887), vol. 1, p. 979.
3See M.-P. Rey, Alexander I: The Tsar Who Defeated Napoleon (De Kalb, Ill., 2012), ch. 7.
4Ibid., Kindle edn, loc. 6079.
5IRL RAN, f. 57, op. 1, n. 63, l. 57 (Sergei Volkonsky).
6A. Ulam, Russia’s Failed Revolutions: From the Decembrists to the Dissidents (New York, 1981), p. 5.
7A. Sergeyev, ‘Graf A. Kh. Benkendorf o Rossii v 1827–30gg. (Yezhegodnyye otchoty tret’yego otdeleniya i korpusa zhandarmov)’, Krasnyi Arkhiv, vol. 37 (1929), pp. 131–74.
8P. Squire, ‘The Metternich–Benckendorff Letters, 1835–1842’, Slavonic and East European Review, vol. 45, no. 105 (July 1967), pp. 368–90.
9N. Riasanovsky, Nicholas I and Official Nationality in Russia (Berkeley, 1959), p. 74.
10K. Aksakov, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 2 vols (St Petersburg, 1861), vol. 2, p. 292.
11N. Gogol, Pis’ma, 4 vols (St Petersburg, n.d.), vol. 2, p. 508.
12P. Annenkov, The Extraordinary Decade: Literary Memoirs (Ann Arbor, 1968).
13V. Belinskii, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 13 vols (Moscow, 1953–9), vol. 10, p. 212.
14A Presniakov, Emperor Nicholas I of Russia: The Apogee of Autocracy, 1825–1855 (Gulf Breeze, Fla., 1974), p. 56.
15S. Monas, The Third Section: Police and Society in Russia under Nicholas I (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), p. 240.
16NA, FO 195/332, Colquhoun to Stratford Canning, 2 July 1849.
17W. Bruce Lincoln, Nicholas I: Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias (De Kalb, Ill., 1989), p. 321; Monas, The Third Section, pp. 142, 194.
18J. and E. Goncourt, Journal: Mémoires de la vie littéraire, ed. Robert Ricatte, 3 vols (Monaco, 1956), vol. 2, p. 499.
19A. Taylor, The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918 (Oxford, 1959), p. 49.
20O. Figes, Crimea: The Last Crusade (London, 2010), p. 8.
21A. Zaoinchkovskii, Vostochnaia voina, 1853–1856, 3 vols (St Petersburg, 2002), vol. 2, p. 523.
22Ibid., vol. 1, pp. 702–8.
23Figes, Crimea, p. 442.
24N. Danilevskii, Russia and Europe: The Slavic World’s Political and Cultural Relations with the Germanic-Roman West, trans. S. Woodburn (Bloomington, Ind., 2013), p. 107.
25A. Kelly, Toward Another Shore: Russian Thinkers between Necessity and Chance (New Haven, 1998), p. 41.
26RGIA, f. 914, op. 1, d. 68, ll. 1–2.
27Materialy dlia istorii uprazdneniia krepostnogo sostoianii pomeshchich’ikh krest’ian v Rossii ν tsarstvovanii Imperatora Aleksandra II, 3 vols (Berlin, 1860–2), vol. 1, p. 114.
7 An Empire in Crisis
1For more on the Bezdna incident: Daniel Field, Rebels in the Name of the Tsar (New York, 1976).
2T. Emmons, ‘The Peasant and the Emancipation’, in W. Vucinich (ed.), The Peasant in Nineteenth-Century Russia (Stanford, 1968), p. 54.
3See J. Blum, Lord and Peasant in Russia: From the Ninth to the Nineteenth Century (Princeton, 1961), pp. 512–14.
4I discuss the peasant ideology in greater depth in A People’s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution, 1891–1924 (London, 1996), pp. 98–102; and Peasant Russia, Civil War: The Volga Countryside in Revolution, 1917–1921 (Oxford, 1989), ch. 3.
5Figes, A People’s Tragedy, p. 105.
6T. Shanin, The Awkward Class (Oxford, 1972), p. 48.
7A. Anfimov, Zemel’naya arenda v Rossii v nachale XX veka (Moscow, 1961), p. 15.
8D. Saunders, Russia in the Age of Reaction and Reform (London, 1992), p. 213.
9J. Habermas, ‘The Public Sphere’, New German Critique, no. 3 (1974), p. 49.
10Figes, A People’s Tragedy, p. 46.
11F. Venturi, Roots of Revolution: A History of the Populist and Socialist Movements in Nineteenth-Century Russia (New York, 1960), p. xxvi.
12See R. Crews, For Prophet and Tsar: Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia (Cambridge, Mass., 2009).
13J. Brooks, When Russia Learned to Read: Literacy and Popular Literature, 1861–1917 (Princeton, 1985), pp. 55–6.
14For an analysis of Russia as a ‘developing society’ at this time see T. Shanin, Russia as a ‘Developing Society’, vol. 1: Roots of Otherness: Russia’s Turn of Century (London, 1985). On similar patterns of rural migration into towns in twentieth-century India see R. Chandavarkar, ‘“The Making of the Working Class”: E. P. Thompson and Indian History’, History Workshop Journal, no. 43 (1997), pp. 185–7.
15T. von Laue, ‘A Secret Memorandum of Sergei Witte on the Industrialization of Imperial Russia’, Journal of Modern History, vol. 26 (1954), p. 71.
16D. Volkogonov, Lenin: Life and Legacy (London, 1991), pp. 8–9.
17L. Fischer, The Life of Lenin (London, 1965), p. 329.
18L. Lih, Lenin Rediscovered: What Is to Be Done? In Context (Chicago, 2008), p. 447.
19W. Sablinsky, The Road to Bloody Sunday: Father Gapon and the St Petersburg Massacre of 1905 (Princeton, 1976), p. 344.
20On earlier signs of more hostile peasant attitudes towards the tsar, based on police arrest protocols of peasants denounced for anti-tsarist statements following the assassination of Alexander III in 1881, see D. Beer, ‘“To a Dog, a Dog’s Death!”: Naive Monarchism and Regicide in Imperial Russia, 1878–1884’, Slavic Review, vol. 80, no. 1 (2021), pp. 112–32.
21Voennaya Gazeta, 13 June 1913, p. 2.
22Novoe Vremia, 6 March 1914.
23Figes, A People’s Tragedy, p. 251.
24P. Gilliard, Thirteen Years at the Russian Court (London, 1921), p. 111.
25A. Brussilov, A Soldier’s Notebook, 1914–1918 (London, 1930), p. 39.
26F. Golder, Documents on Russian History, 1914–1917 (New York, 1927), p. 21.
8 Revolutionary Russia
1A. Brussilov, A Soldier’s Notebook, 1914–1918 (London, 1930), pp. 93–4.
2O. Figes and B. Kolonitskii, Interpreting the Russian Revolution: The Language and Symbols of 1917 (New Haven, 1999), p. 24.
3B. Pares (ed.), Letters of the Tsaritsa to the Tsar, 1914–1916 (London, 1923), p. 157.
4O. Figes, A People’s Tragedy: The Russian Revolution, 1891–1924 (London, 1996), p. 345.
5L. Trotsky, The History of the Russian Revolution (London, 1977), p. 193.
6G. Buchanan, My Mission to Russia and Other Diplomatic Memoirs, 2 vols (London, 1923), vol. 2, p. 86.
7OR RNB f. 152, op. 1, d. 98, l. 34.
8St Antony’s College, Oxford, Russian and East European Centre, G. Katkov Papers, ‘Moskovskii sovet rabochikh deputatov (1917–1922)’, p. 10.
9R. Lockhart, Memoirs of a British Agent (London, 1933), p. 304.
10R. Browder and A. Kerensky (eds), The Russian Provisional Government 1917: Documents, 3 vols (Stanford, 1961), vol. 2, pp. 913–15.
11F. Farmborough, Nurse at the Russian Front (London, 1977), pp. 269–70.
12G. Zinoviev, ‘Lenin i iiul’skie dni’, Proletarskaya Revoliutsiia, no. 8–9 (1929), p. 62.
13V. Lenin, Collected Works, 47 vols (London, 1977), vol. 25, pp. 176–9.
14Ibid., vol. 26, pp. 19, 21.
15The Bolsheviks and the October Revolution: Minutes of the Central Committee of the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party (Bolsheviks), August 1917–February 1918, trans. A. Bone (London, 1974), p. 98.
16Figes, A People’s Tragedy, pp. 489–91.
17M. Gorky, Untimely Thoughts: Essays on Revolution, Culture, and the Bolsheviks, 1917–1918, trans. Herman Ermolaev (New Haven, 1995), p. 95.
18V. Lenin, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, 55 vols (Moscow, 1958–65), vol. 35, p. 204.
19RGASPI, f. 17, op. 1, d. 405, l. 1–13.
20J. Wheeler-Bennett, Brest-Litovsk: The Forgotten Peace (New York, 1938), p. 269.
21O. Figes, Peasant Russia, Civil War: The Volga Countryside in Revolution, 1917–1921 (Oxford, 1989), pp. 150 ff.
22O. Figes, ‘The Village and Volost Soviet Elections of 1919’, Soviet Studies, vol. 40, no. 1 (1988), pp. 21–45.
23Figes and Kolonitskii, Interpreting the Russian Revolution, p. 152.
24O. Figes, ‘The Red Army and Mass Mobilization during the Russian Civil War’, Past & Present, vol. 129, issue 1 (1990), pp. 206–9.
25Kronshtadtski miatezh: sbornik statei, vospominanii i dokumentov (Leningrad, 1931), p. 26.
26See I. Getzler, Kronstadt, 1917–1921: The Fate of a Soviet Democracy (Cambridge, 1983).
27Lenin, Collected Works, vol. 33, pp. 487–502.
9 The War on Old Russia
1N. Sukhanov, The Russian Revolution, 1917: A Personal Record, ed. J. Carmichael (Oxford, 1955), p. 230.
2S. Kotkin, Stalin, vol. 1: Paradoxes of Power, 1878–1928 (London, 2014), p. 432.
3Ibid., pp. 433–41; B. Bazhanov, Bazhanov and the Damnation of Stalin, trans. D. Doyle (Athens, Oh., 1990), p. 40. See further, N. Rosenfeldt, ‘“The Consistory of the Communist Church”: The Origins and Development of Stalin’s Secret Chancellery’, Russian History 9 (1982), pp. 308–24; J. Harris, ‘Stalin as General Secretary: The Appointments Process and the Nature of Stalin’s Power’, in S. Davis and J. Harris, Stalin: A New History (Cambridge, 2005), pp. 63–82.
4Izvestiia TsK, no. 12 (1989), pp. 193, 198.
5N. Tumarkin, Lenin Lives! The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia (Cambridge, Mass., 1997), pp. 139–49, 160–4; O. Velikanova, Making of an Idol: On Uses of Lenin (Göttingen, 1996), pp. 33–4.
6See R. Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine (Oxford, 1986), and A. Applebaum, Red Famine: Stalin’s War on Ukraine (New York, 2017).
7N. Kaminskaya, Final Judgment: My Life as a Soviet Defence Attorney (New York, 1982), pp. 18–21.
8On such statements and their provenance see D. Brandenberger and A. Dubrovsky, ‘“The People Need a Tsar”: The Emergence of National Bolshevism as Stalinist Ideology, 1931–1941’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 50, no. 5 (1998), p. 873.
9O. Figes, The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin’s Russia (London, 2007), p. 275.
10J. Haslam, ‘Political Opposition to Stalin and the Origins of the Terror in Russia, 1932–1936’, Historical Journal, vol. 29, no. 2 (1986), p. 396.
11J. Getty and O. Naumov, The Road to Terror: Stalin and the Self-Destruction of the Bolsheviks, 1932–1939 (New Haven, 1999), pp. 54–7.
12H. Kuromiya, ‘Accounting for the Great Terror’, Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, New Series, vol. 53, no. 1 (2005), pp. 86–101.
13O. Khlevniuk, Master of the House: Stalin and his Inner Circle (New Haven, 2009), p. 174; Istochnik, no. 3 (1994), p. 80.
10 Motherland
1Izvestiia, 29 November 1938; Kino-Gazeta, 2 December 1938.
2S. Eizenshtein, ‘Patriotizm – moia tema’, in Izbrannye prozvedeniia v shesti tomakh (Moscow, 1964), vol. 1, p. 162.
3D. Brandenberger and A. Dubrovsky, ‘ “The People Need a Tsar”: The Emergence of National Bolshevism as Stalinist Ideology, 1931–1941’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 50, no. 5 (1998), p. 880.
4See T. Martin, The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939 (Ithaca, NY, 2001).
5Cited in S. Plokhy, Lost Kingdom: A History of Russian Nationalism from Ivan the Great to Vladimir Putin (London, 2018), p. 255.
6O. Khlevniuk, Stalin: New Biography of a Dictator, trans. N. Favorov (New Haven, 2015), p. 188.
7T. Snyder, Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning (New York, 2016), p. 19.
8Pravda, 3 July 1941, p. 1.
9Khlevniuk, Stalin, p. 218.
10Vecherniaya Moskva, 8 November 1941.
11M. Djilas, Conversations with Stalin, trans. M. Petrovich (London, 2014), p. 40.
12Interviews with Rebekka (Rita) Kogan, St Petersburg, June, November 2003. See O. Figes, The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin’s Russia (London, 2007), pp. 417–19.
13The figures for military casualties are disputed and difficult to calculate with certainty. The figure given by the Russian Ministry of Defence is 8.7 million but higher figures (up to 14 million) have been calculated from lists of personnel in military archives. I have followed Viktor Zemskov’s calculation based on counting Soviet POWs who died in forced-labour camps in Germany (V. Zemskov, ‘O Masshtabakh liudskikh poter’ SSSR v Velikoi Otechestvennoi Voine’, Voenno-Istoricheskii Arkhiv, vol. 9 [2012], pp. 59–71).
14R. McNeal, Stalin: Man and Ruler (London, 1988), p. 241.
15G. Hosking, ‘The Second World War and Russian National Consciousness’, Past & Present, vol. 175, issue 1 (2002), p. 177.
16Figes, The Whisperers, pp. 414–15.
17Djilas, Conversations with Stalin, p. 78.
18
19Djilas, Conversations with Stalin, p. 45.
20Ibid., pp. 80–1.
21M. Ellman and S. Maksudov, ‘Soviet Deaths in the Great Patriotic War: A Note’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 46, no. 4 (1994), p. 671. The estimate of 28 million was made by an expert commission appointed by Gorbachev in 1989.
22No explanation of Stalin’s motives for grossly underestimating the war losses has yet been found in the archival documents. It may be that he had in mind the possibility of a new war against the West and did not want the population to be told how many had already died.
23
24I. Stalin, Speeches Delivered at Meetings of Voters of the Stalin Electoral District, Moscow (Moscow, 1950), pp. 19–44.
25Pravda, 9 January 1949.
26Pravda, 7 November 1946.
27L. Alexeyeva and P. Goldberg, The Thaw Generation: Coming of Age in the Post-Stalin Era (Boston, 1990), p. 4.
28J. Brodsky, ‘Spoils of War’, in On Grief and Reason: Essays (London, 1996), p. 8.
29S. Schattenberg, Brezhnev: The Making of a Statesman, trans. J. Heath (London, 2021), p. 186.
30Ibid., p. 217.
31L. Timofeev, Soviet Peasants: Or, the Peasants’ Art of Starving (n.p., 1985).
32The Current Digest of the Soviet Press (Columbus, Oh.), 27 April 1988, pp. 1–6.
11 Ends
1See e.g. A. Ostrovsky, Inventing Russia: The Journey from Gorbachev’s Freedom to Putin’s War (London, 2018), p. 115.
2Diane Sawyer of ABC, World News Tonight:
3See the interview with Aleksandr Mikhailov, the KGB’s press officer:
4A. Kolesnichenko, ‘Effects of 1991 August Putsch still felt in Russia’, Russia Beyond the Headlines, 23 August 2013:
5T. Wood, Russia without Putin: Money, Power and the Myths of the New Cold War (London, 2018), Kindle edn, loc. 555.
6See D. Hoffman, The Oligarchs: Wealth and Power in the New Russia (New York, 2001).
7M. Gessen, Man without A Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin (New York, 2013).
8S. Corbesero, ‘History, Myth and Memory: A Biography of a Stalin Portrait’, Russian History, vol. 38, no. 1 (2011), p. 77. Many thanks to @cdmoldes for tracking down the image.
9V. Putin, ‘Russia at the Turn of the Millennium’,
10C. Belton, Putin’s People: How the KGB Took Back Russia and Then Took on the West (London, 2020), p. 267.
11L. Aron, ‘The Problematic Pages’, New Republic, 24 September 2008.
12Kommersant-Vlast’, no. 27 (371), 16 July 2007.
13G. Pavlovskii, ‘Plokho s pamiat’iu – plokho s politikoi’, Russkii Zhurnal, December 2008.
14See my account in ‘Putin vs. The Truth’, New York Review of Books, 30 April 2009.
15International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Russia – ‘Crimes against History’, report published 10 June 2021, p. 29:
16Ibid., p. 10. See further I. Kurilla, ‘The Implications of Russia’s Law against the “Rehabilitation of Nazism”’, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 331 (August 2014).
17A. Miller, ‘Adjusting Historical Policy in Russia’, Russia in Global Affairs, no. 4 (2014):
18E. Klimenko, ‘Building the Nation, Legitimizing the State: Russia – My History and Memory of the Russian Revolutions in Contemporary Russia’, Nationalities Papers, vol. 49, no. 1 (2021), pp. 72–88.
19
20
21Iu. Levada, ‘“Chelovek sovetskii”: chetvertaia volna’, Polit.ru, 30 April 2010:
22D. Khapaeva and N. Koposov, Pozhaleite, lyudi, palachei: Massovoe istoricheskoe soznanie v postsovetskoi Rossii i Stalinizm (Moscow, 2007).
23For transcripts and recordings of the shows see:
24Cited in R. Braithwaite, ‘NATO enlargement: Assurances and misunderstandings’, European Council on Foreign Relations, 7 July 2016. On-line edition:
25T. Friedman, ‘Foreign Affairs; Now a Word from X’, New York Times, 2 May 1998.
26
27
28NATO’s intervention in Yugoslavia was preceded by three UN Security Council resolutions condemning Belgrade’s policies. No such diplomatic efforts were made by the Russians before their invasion of Ukraine. Ninety-seven UN member states recognised Kosovo’s independence, whereas only five recognised the legality of Russia’s annexation of Crimea.
29On Glazyev’s influence see M. Zygar, All the Kremlin’s Men: Inside the Court of Vladimir Putin (New York, 2016), ch. 17.
30M. Sarotte, Not One Inch: America, Russia, and the Making of Post-Cold War Stalemate (New Haven, 2022), p. 184.
31
32
33
34
35For Zelensky’s comments on the timescale of a constitutional change see his fascinating interview with four Russian independent journalists:
Picture Credits
Vladimir Putin and Patriarch Kirill at the Vladimir the Great monument in Moscow. Photo: https://mos.ru/mayor/media/photo/5454057/carousel/2/11/; photographer: Evgeny Samarin
Viktor Vasnetsov (1848–1926), The Invitation of the Varangians… Photo: Wikimedia Commons PD
The Church of St Sophia, Kiev, Ukraine. Photo: Ivan Nesterov/Alamy
Iconostasis inside the Dormition Cathedral, Moscow. Photo: robertharding/Alamy
Birch bark letter from Peter to Volchko, from Nerevsky, Novgorod, c. 1120–1140. ‘Was it you that told Roshnet that two sorochoks are to be collected…’. Photo: www.gramoty.ru ©The National Museums Veliky Novgorod
Andrei Rublev (c. 1370–1430), The Holy Trinity, 1420s. Tempera on wood. Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. Photo: Universal History Archive/Getty Images
An aerial view of the Solovetsky Monastery, Arkhangelsk Region. Photo: ITAR-TASS/Alamy
Cathedral square, Kremlin, Moscow. Photo: Ivan Vdovin/Alamy
Anonymous, attributed to Athanasius, The Blessed Host of the Heavenly Tsar (Church Militant), 1552. Tempera on wood. Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. Photo: Wikimedia Commons PD
Vasily Surikov (1848–1916), Ermak’s Conquest of Siberia in 1582, c. 1895. Oil on canvas. State Russian Museum, St Petersburg. Photo: Universal History Archive/Getty Images
Ilya Repin (1844–1930), Ivan the Terrible and his son Ivan, 16 November 1581, 1885. Oil on canvas. Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. Photo: incamerastock/Alamy
Viktor Vasnetsov (1848–1926), Portrait of Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible, 1897. Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. Photo: Niday Picture Library/Alamy
Anonymous, Portrait of Tsar Alexei I of Russia, Moscow (1629–1676), c. 1670–1680. Moscow State History Museum. Photo: DeAgostini/Getty Images
Putin at the Minin and Pozharsky Monument, Moscow, 4th November 2017. Photo: ITAR-TASS/Alamy
Valentin Serov (1865–1911), Peter I the Great (1672–1725), 1907. Gouache on card. Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. Photo: Painters/Alamy
Godfrey Kneller (1646–1723), Peter the Great, Tsar of Russia, 1698. Oil on canvas. Royal Collection Trust. Photo: © Royal Collection/Royal Collection Trust © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, 2022/Bridgeman Images
Alexey Zubov, The Ceremonial Entry of the Russian Troops to Moscow on December 21, 1709… Engraving. State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg. Photo: Wikiart PD
The Mice are Burying the Cat, c. 1760. State Art Museum, Yarosl. Photo: Heritage Images/Getty Images
Vigilius Eriksen (1722–1782), Equestrian Portrait of Catherine II (1729–96) the Great of Russia, 18th century. Oil on canvas. Museum of Fine Arts, Chartres, France. Photo: Alamy
Monument to Peter the Great. Photo: Dmitry Tonkopi/Alamy
Ilya Repin (1844–1930), 17 October 1905, 1907. Oil on canvas. State Russian Museum, St. Petersburg. Photo: Bridgeman Images
Peasants in rural village, c. 1890s. Photo: Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Workers at the Ivanovo textile mill, 1905. Photo: Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Nicholas II with Empress Alexandra and their son Alexei at the Moscow Kremlin, 1913. Photo: Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Bronze head of a ruined statue of Alexander III, 1917. Photo: Everett Collection/Alamy
Fyodor Shurpin (1904–72), The Morning of Our Motherland, c. 1948. Oil on canvas. Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. Photo: Bridgeman Images
Irakli Toidze (1902–85), Mother Russia Calls, 1941. Soviet poster. Private Collection. Photo: Stefano Bianchetti/Bridgeman Images
United Russia party poster, Moscow, November 5, 2003. Photo: Misha Japaridze/AP/Shutterstock
A panel from the ‘My History’ exhibition. Photo: courtesy Ivan Kurilla
Index
Abkhazia here
Abramov, Fedor here
Adashev, Alexei here
Afghanistan, invasion of (1979) here
Agapetus: Patrologia Graecae here
Ahmed, Khan here
Akhmatova, Anna here
Aksakov, Konstantin here
Alatyr here
Albanians here, here
alcohol consumption here, here, here
Alexander I, Tsar (1777–1825) here, here
Alexander II, Tsar (1818–81) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Alexander III, Tsar (1845–94) here, here equestrian statue (St Petersburg) here
Alexandra Fedorovna, Empress here, here, here, here, here
Alexeeva, Liudmilla here
Alexei, Tsar (1643–76) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Alexei Nikolaevich, Tsarevich here, here
Alexei Petrovich, Tsarevich here, here
All-Union Party Conference (1988) here
Allilueva, Nadezhda (Stalin’s wife) here, here
Alma Heights, battle of (1854) here
Amur valley here
Anarchists here
Andreeva, Nina here ‘I Cannot Give Up Principles’ here
Andropov, Yuri here
Andrusovo, Treaty of (1667) here
Anna, Empress here, here
Annenkov, Pavel here
Antonov, General Alexei here
Anybei here
apanages here
Arakcheyev, General Alexei here
Arctic zone here, here, here, here
Ardatov here
Ardym here
Armenia/Armenians here, here, here, here Dashnaks here
arts and culture here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here see also icons; literature; music; paintings
Arzamas here
Assemblies of the Land here, here, here, here, here, here
Astrakhan here, here, here, here, here, here monument to Grand Prince Vladimir here
Athos, Mount (Greece) here
August III, of Poland here
Augustus, Emperor here
Aurora (cruiser) here
Austerlitz, battle of (1805) here
Austria/Austrians here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Austrian-Hungarian Empire here, here, here
autocracy here, here, here, here, here and the Mongols here, here, here, here and Ivan IV here patrimonial here, here, here, here, here and Catherine II here Madame de Staël on here and Alexander I here and Nicholas I here, here and the intelligentsia here, here and Alexander II here and Alexander III here; opposed by the Duma here, here and Nicholas II here, here, here and Putin here, here, here, here, here, here
Avvakum, Archpriest here, here
Azov Fortress, capture of (1637) here
Azov Sea here, here
Baghdad, Iraq here
Bakunin, Mikhail here
Balkans, the here, here, here, here, here Slavs here, here, here see also Serbia/Serbs
Baltic Sea here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Baltic states here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also Estonia; Latvia; Lithuania
Bandera, Stepan here, here
barshchina (labour service) here
Bashkiria here
Bashkirs, the here
Basil, St here
Basil II, Byzantine emperor here
Basmanov, Alexei here
Bataisk: monument to Grand Prince Vladimir here
Batu Khan here, here, here, here, here
Beccaria, Cesare here
Bekbulatovich, Semen here
Belarus/Belarusians (White Russians) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Belgium: 1830 revolution here, here
Belgorod: monument to Grand Prince Vladimir here
Belinsky, Vissarion here, here ‘Letter to Gogol’ here, here
Belskys, the here, here
Bem, General Jozef here
Benckendorff, Count Alexander here, here
Berezovsky, Boris here, here, here
Beria, Lavrenty here, here
Bering, Vitus: Kamchatka expeditions here
Berlin here, here 1848 revolt here Russian exiles here fall of the Berlin Wall (1989) here, here
Beslan, North Ossetia here
Bezdna here
Biron (Bühren), Ernst-Johann von here
Black Death here
Black Sea here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Black Sea Fleet here, here, here
Blackstone, William here
Blinken, Antony here
Blok, Alexander here
Bolotnikov, Ivan here, here
Bolshevik (journal) here
Bolsheviks: beginnings here reforms inspired by Peter the Great here Jewish members here and October Revolution (1917) here; and the army here, here, see also Red Army; and collapse of Kerensky’s Provisional Government here; open peace talks with Germany here; name change to Communist Party here; and Civil War here, here, here; War Communism here, here; and peasant uprisings here, here, here; taxation here, here; their New Economic Policy here, here, here; and the Comintern here; ‘Internationale’ here; under Stalin here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and the Church here, here; Gorbachev here; dying out here, here; and Putin’s anger over Ukraine here; see also Lenin, Vladimir
Boltin, Ivan here
Bondarchuk, Fedor here
Book of Pedigrees, The here
Boris, St here
Borodino, battle of (1812) here
Bosnia here
‘bourgeoisie’ (burzhooi) here, here, here
boyars here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Boyars’ Councils here, here, here, here
Brest-Litovsk Treaty (1918) here, here
Brezhnev, Leonid/Brezhnev government here, here, here, here, here, here
Britain/the British: and Napoleon’s Continental System here; and Poland here; and Alexander I’s Holy Alliance (1815) here; and Belgian revolution against the Dutch here; factory conditions (1840s) here; and Hungarian Revolution (1848) here; and the Turks here, here; criticised by Pogodin here; Russophobic press here; and the Crimean War here; and the execution of the Romanov imperial family here; state officials (1900) here; Triple Entente with Russia and France (1907) here; in World War I here; relations with Soviet Union (1920s) here; and World War II here; as safe haven for Russian oligarchs here
Brodsky, Joseph here
Brusilov, General Alexei here
Bucha, Ukraine here
Buchanan, George, British ambassador here
Bucharest, Romania: 1848 revolution here; NATO conference (2008) here, here
Budapest, Hungary: 1848 revolution here
Bukharin, Nikolai here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Bulgakov, Mikhail here
Bulgaria/Bulgarians here, here, here, here, here, here
Bulgars, Volga here
bureaucracy here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
burial rites, medieval here
Buriats, the here
Bush, George W., President here, here
Buturlin Committee here
Byzantine Empire/Byzantines/Byzantium here; and Russian foundation myths here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; influences on Russia here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and Slavs here; trade with Russia here, here, here, here; and the Khazar khaganate here, here; and Prince Vladimir’s conversion to Christianity here, here, here; icons here, here; hesychasm here; and Ivan IV’s coronation here, here; Peter the Great’s break with here, here, here, here; see also Constantinople; Eastern Orthodox Church
carbonari here
Caspian Sea here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Catherine I (1684–1727) here, here
Catherine II, the Great (1729–96) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Nakaz (‘Instruction to the Legislative Commission’) here, here
Caucasian Bureau here
censorship here, here, here, here; of history here, here; of literature and journals here, here, here, here, here
Central Committee here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; 1987 Plenum here
Chaadaev, Petr here
Chancellor, Richard here
Charles XII, of Sweden here
Charles Peter Ulrich of Schleswig-Holstein-Gottorp here
Chechens/Chechnya here, here, here, here
Cheka (Extraordinary Commission for Struggle against Counter-Revolution and Sabotage) here, here, here, here
Chekhov, Anton here
Chembar here
Chernenko, Konstantin here
Cherniavsky, Michael here, here
Chernigov here, here, here
Chernobyl nuclear disaster (1986) here
China/Chinese here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Chingiz Khan here, here, here, here, here
Chingizids here
Christianity see Eastern Orthodox Church
Chubais, Anatoly here, here
Chud, Lake: battle (1242) here
Chukchis, the here
Church, the see Eastern Orthodox Church
Chuvash tribesmen here
Civil War here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Cold War here, here, here, here, here, here
collective farms/collectivisation: artels here; and sobornost here; small (TOZ) here, here; large (kolkhozes) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
collective responsibility, system of (krugovaya poruka) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Collins, Samuel here
Comintern (Communist International) here, here, here
commune, the see mir
Communism here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also War Communism
Communist Party see Bolsheviks
Communist Youth League see Komsomol
Congress of People’s Deputies here
Congress of Vienna (1814) here, here
Constantine IX Monomachos here
Constantinople here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Hagia Sophia here, here, here
Constituent Assembly here, here, here, here
Contemporary, The (journal) here
cooperatives here
Cossacks: military formation here; and conquest of Siberia here; join army of pretender tsar Dmitry here, here; liberate Moscow from Poles here, here; and raids on Crimean and Turkish territories here; rebellions and election of rebel tsars here, here, here; in Siberia here; a hetmanate here, here, here, here, here, here; and war of liberation against Poland here; sign Treaty of Pereyaslav (1654) here; and Ukraine here, here, here, here; and Old Believers here, here; join Charles XII of Sweden here; lead revolt in Astrakhan here; and Ivan VI’s murder here; the Pugachev revolt (1773–4) here; attack on Napoleon’s forces here; and Kornilov’s attempted coup here; in the Civil War here, here
Council of People’s Commissars (Sovnarkom) here
Courland here, here
Court of Time, The (Sud vremeni) (TV show) here
Covid-19 here
Crimea/Crimeans: Grand Prince Vladimir’s conversion and baptism in here, here, here; as a khanate here, here, here; Tatars here, here, here, here, here, here, here; battles between Russians and Muslims and Turks here, here, here; annexed by Russia (1783) here; War (1853–6) here, here, here, here, here, here, here; claimed by Ukraine (1917) here; the Whites’ last stand (1920) here; assigned to Ukraine by Khrushchev (1954) here, here, here; Gorbachev holidays in (1991) here; annexed by Russia (2014) here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) here, here
Cromwell, Oliver here
Crusade, Fourth here
Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) here
culture see arts and culture
Cumans see Polovtsians
cyberwar here
Cyril (monk) here, here
Czartoryski, Prince Adam Jerzy here, here
Czartoryski, Prince Adam Kazimierz here, here
Czech Legion here
Czechoslovakia/Czech Republic: Soviet invasion of (1968) here; NATO membership here
Dalmatia here
Daniil Alexandrovich, Prince of Moscow here
Daniilovichi, the here, here, here, here
Danilevsky, Nikolai here; Russia and Europe here, here
Dardanelles, the here
Dashkova, Princess here
Daurians, the here, here
Dazhborg (god) here
Decembrist uprising (1825) here, here, here
democracy/democratic principles here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Lenin and here, here; Putin and here, here; ‘sovereign’ here, here; see also Kadet Party; Social Democratic Labour Party
Denikin, General Anton here, here, here, here
Denmark here, here, here
Diderot, Denis here, here
Djilas, Milovan here, here, here, here
Dmitriev, Yuri here
Dmitry, Tsar (pretender) here, here
Dmitry Ivanovich, Tsarevich (1552–3) here
Dmitry Ivanovich, Tsarevich (1582–91) here, here
Dmitry Ivanovich Donskoi, Grand Prince of Moscow here, here, here
Dnepropetrovsk Party, Ukraine here
Dnieper, River here, here, here, here, here, here
Doctors’ Plot (1952) here
Don, River here, here, here, here, here, here
Don Cossacks here, here, here, here, here; see also Cossacks
Donbass, the (Ukraine) here, here, here, here, here
Donetsk, Ukraine here
Doroshenko, Petro here
Dorpat (Tartu), Livonia here, here
Dostoevsky, Fedor here, here, here, here, here, here; The House of the Dead here
Dresden, Germany: 1848 revolt here
Dubĉek, Alexander here
Dugin, Alexander here, here; The Foundations of Geopolitics here
Duma, the here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Progressive Bloc here; Temporary Committee for the Restoration of Order here, here
Durnovo, Petr here, here
Dzerzhinsky, Feliks here, here; statue here
Eastern Orthodox Church/the Church: and Grand Prince Vladimir’s conversion here, here, here; spreads from Byzantine Empire here; and Russian churches here; Russian saints, here, here, here, here, here, here; under Mongol rule here, here, here, here; and Ivan IV’s coronation here, here, here; and the Russian Church here; and conquest of Kazan here, here; and building of St Basil’s here; and myth of tsar’s divine status here; and the Poles here; as cause of lack of development of Russian secular culture here; and influence from Ukraine here; Nikon’s reforms here; and the Old Believers here, here, here, here, here; and Peter the Great here, here; and Catherine II here, here; and war in the Crimea here; and Slavophiles here; and Nicholas I here; and siege of Sevastopol here; defeats Stolypin’s plans for state schools here; and the New Economic Policy here; and embalming of corpses here; attacked by Bolsheviks here, here; and Putin here, here, here, here; see also icons
Economists, the (Marxists) here, here
economy/economic systems: seigneurial here; 12th-13th century here, here; Mongol here; 16th-century here, here, here, here; 17th-century here, here; under Peter the Great here; under Catherine the Great here; and the Crimea here, here; and Alexander II’s reforms here; and the Emancipation Decree here; and the zemstvos here; in World War I here, here; and War Communism here, here; Lenin’s New Economic Policy here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and war against kulaks and collective farms here; and Stalin’s FiveYear Plan here, here; in World War II here, here; postwar here, here, here; and perestroika here; under Yeltsin here; and Putin’s administration here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
education see schools; universities
Ehrenburg, Ilya: The Thaw here
Eisenstein, Sergei: Alexander Nevsky here, here, here, here; Ivan the Terrible here, here
Ekaterinburg here
Ekaterinoslav here
Elena Glinskaya, Princess here
Elias, St here
Elizabeth I, of England here
Elizabeth Petrovna, Empress of Russia here, here, here, here
Emancipation Decree (1861) here
Enlightenment, the here, here, here, here, here, here
Ermak (Cossack) here
estates (sosloviia) here
Estonia/Estonians here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also Baltic states
Eternal Peace, Treaty of (1686) here
Eurasian Economic Union here
Eurasianists: Exodus to the East here
European Union (EU) here, here, here, here, here, here
factionalism here, here
factories here, here, here, here, here, here; see also vydvizhentsy
Falconet, Étienne-Maurice: Peter the Great here
famines here, here, here, here; terror-famine (Holodomor) here, here
Federal Counter-Intelligence Service here
Federal Security Service (FSB) here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Fedor I, Tsar (1557–98) here
Fedor III, Tsar (1661–82) here
Fedor, Tsarevich here, here
Ferdinand, Archduke here
FIFA World Cup (2018) here
Filaret, Patriarch here
Filofei (monk) here
Finland/Finns here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Social Democrats here; Winter War here
Finno-Ugric tribes here, here, here, here
Fioravanti, Aristotele: Dormition Cathedral, Moscow here
flag, Russian here
Fletcher, Giles here
Florence, Italy here; Council of (1438–9) here
Foreign Agents Law (2012) here
France/the French: and Peter the Great here, here; and Peter III here; state officials (1900) here; Grande Armée here, here, here; the Republic here; and the Ottomans here; under Napoleon III here, here; and annexation of Algeria here; and the Crimean War here; comparisons with Russia here, here; alliance with Russia (1894) here; and World War I here; brokers Minsk II Accords here; see also French Revolution; Napoleon Bonaparte; Paris
Franz Joseph, Emperor of Austria here
Frederick the Great, king of Prussia here, here
Frederick William IV, of Prussia here
Freemasons here, here
French Revolution (1789) here, here, here; Jacobins here, here, here, here, here, here
Friedland, battle of (180) here
FSB see Federal Security Service
Fundamental Laws (1906) here
fur trade here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Gaidar, Yegor here
Galich here, here
Galicia here, here, here, here
Gapon, Father Georgy here
Garamond, Claude here
gas here, here, here, here, here, here
Gazprom here
George V, of Great Britain here
Georgia/Georgians here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Bolsheviks here; Social Democrats here
Germans/Germany: and Viking influences here; and Prince Vladimir’s conversion here; trade with Russia here, here, here, here; Teutonic knights defeated by Nevsky here; dramas performed in St Petersburg here; Russian fear of here; and Peter the Great here, here, here; tsars born to German parents here; and Empress Anna here; sent to Siberia here; and Peter III here; and Catherine II here, here; historians (1750s) here, here; in Napoleon’s Grande Armée here; and Nicholas I here, here; comparisons with Russia here, here, here; and Baltic provinces here; Triple Entente formed against (1907) here, here; and World War I here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and the Bolsheviks here; Brest-Litovsk peace talks here; and Ukraine here, here, here, here, here; Communist strikes here; and World War II here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and Hitler–Stalin Pact here, here
glasnost (openness) here, here, here, here
Glazyev, Sergei here
Gleb, St here
Glinka, Mikhail here; A Life for the Tsar here; ‘Patriotic Song’ here
Glinskys, the here
Godunov, Tsar Boris (1552–1605) here, here, here, here
Gogol, Nikolai here, here, here; Dead Souls here; Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends here
Golden Horde, the here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Gorbachev, Mikhail here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Gordon, Patrick here
Gori: school here
Gorky, Maxim here, here
grain here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Ukrainian here
Great Northern War (1700–21) here
Great Patriotic War see World War, Second
Great Reforms (1860s) here
Great Terror (1937–8) here, here
Greeks here, here, here; Gospels here; icon painters here, here; hesychasm here; Church here, here, here, here
Grimm, Baron Friedrich here, here, here
Gromyko, Andrei here
Gulag (Main Administration of Corrective Labour Camps and Colonies) system here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Gusinsky, Vladimir here, here
Habermas, Jürgen here
Habsburgs, the here, here, here, here, here; army here
Harald Klak, king of Denmark here
Harold, king of England here
Harriman, Averell here
Helsingfors, Finland here
Herberstein, Sigismund von here, here
Hermogen, Patriarch of Moscow here
Herzen, Alexander here
hesychasm here
history, Russian here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; on stage here; and Catherine II here; Soviet views of here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and Stalin here, here, here, here, here; and ‘The Thaw’ here, here; and Putin here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and silencing of historians here, here, here; and ‘My History’ parks here; contemporary views here, here, here, here; see also Müller, Gerhard Friedrich; schools
Hitler, Adolf here, here, here, here, here, here, here: Mein Kampf here; ‘Hitler–Stalin Pact’ (1939) here, here, here, here, here
Holland here, here
Holodomor see famines
Holy Alliance (1815) here, here, here
Holy Fools here
Holy Lands here, here, here, here; see also Israel
Holy League (1594) here
Holy Roman Empire here, here
Holy Synod, the here
homosexuality here, here, here
Honourable Mirror of Youth, The (manual of etiquette) here
Hungary here, here, here; revolution (1848) here; NATO membership here; see also Austrian-Hungarian Empire
Hurd, Douglas here
Iaroslav Iaroslavich, Prince of Tver here
Iaroslavichi, the here
Iaroslavl here
Ibn Fadlan, Ahmad here
icons here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Ilmen, Lake here
Ilyin, Ivan here, here
industries/industry here, here; under Peter the Great here, here; and the zemtsvos here; in the 1890s here; and World War I here, here; nationalisation of here; and the Civil War here; and the New Economic Policy here, here, here; under Stalin here, here, here; Ukrainian here; and glasnost here; see also factories
Ingria here
Ingush here
‘intelligentsia’ here, here, here, here, here, here; Populist here
International Women’s Day (1917) here
Iona of Riazan, Metropolitan here
Iosif, Patriarch here
Irpin, Ukraine here
Irtysh, River here
Israel here, here; Yom Kippur (Arab–Israel War) (1973) here
Italy here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also Florence
Itil here
Ivan I Daniilovich (‘Kalita’), Grand Prince of Moscow here, here, here, here
Ivan III, Tsar (1440–1505) here, here, here, here
Ivan IV (‘the Terrible’) (1530–84) here, here, here; childhood here; wives here, here, here; personality here; and the boyars here, here, here, here, here; crowned tsar here, here, here; and cult of Prince Vladimir here; and unification of tsar and state here, here; state-building here; and the army here; and the pomeste system here; and the start of Russia’s growth as an imperial power here; defeats Kazan here, here, here, here, here, and Astrakhan here, here; orders construction of St Basil’s here; is granted confirmation of his title by the patriarch of Constantinople here; and Russian expansionism here; and conquest of Siberia here; sets up the oprichnina here; his violence here; kills his son and heir here, here; and My History park exhibits here
Ivan V, Tsar (1666–96) here, here
Ivan VI, Tsar (1740–64) here, here, here
Ivan, Tsarevich here
Izvestia (newspaper) here
Japan/Japanese here, here, here, here
Japheth here
Jewish Labour Bund here
Jews here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Julius II, Pope here
Just Russia, A (fake party) here
kabala contracts here
Kadet Party (Constitutional Democrats) here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Kalka, River here
Kalmyks here
Kaluga here
Kama River here
Kamenev, Lev here, here, here, here
Kaminskaya, Nina here
Kandinsky, Wassily here
Karaganov, Sergei here
Karakorum, Mongolia here, here
Karamzin, Nikolai here, here; History of the Russian State here, here, here, here; Memorandum on Ancient and Modern Russia here
Karelia here, here
Katyn massacre, Poland (1940) here
Kazakhstan here, here, here, here
Kazan here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; University here
Kennan, George here
Kerch here
Kerensky, Alexander here, here, here, here, here, here
KGB here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Khabarov, Yerofey here
Khabarovsk here
Khachaturian, Aram here
khans here, here, here, here, here, here
Khantys, the here
Kharkiv, Ukraine here
Khazar state/Khazars here, here, here
Kherson, Ukraine here, here
Khmelnytsky, Bohdan here, here
Khodorkovsky Mikhail here, here
Khors (god) here
Khovanksy, Ivan Andreyevich here
Khrushchev, Nikita here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; ‘Secret Speech’ here, here; and ‘the Thaw’ here
Kiev here, here, here, here, here, here; monks here, here; building of St Sophia here; 12th century here; and Mongol conquest here, here, here, here; as part of Kingdom of Poland here; and Treaty of Andrusovo (1667) here; a new type of religious education develops in here; building of the monument to Prince Volodymyr (1853) here, here, here; cholera epidemic (1907) here; and end of monarchy here; parliament declares Ukraine’s independence (1918) here; Maidan revolution (2014) here, here, here; and Russian invasion (2022) here, here, here
Kievan Rus here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Kipchaks see Polovtsians
Kirill, Patriarch here, here, here
Kirov, Sergei here
Klin here
Kliuchevsky, Vasily: History of Russia here, here, here, here, here
Kliueva, Nina here
Kneller, Sir Godfrey: portraits of Peter the Great here
Kogan, Rita here
Kokovtsov, Vladimir here
Kolchak, Admiral Alexander here, here
kolkhozes see collective farms
Kollontai, Alexandra here
Komi people here
Komsomol (Communist Youth league) here, here, here, here, here
Komuch (SR government) here, here
Konstantin, Grand Duke here, here
Korea/Koreans here, here
korenizatsiia (indigenisation) here
Kornilov, General Lavr here, here, here
Kosova here, here, here
Kostroma: Ipatiev Monastery here; Romanov estate here
Kosygin, Alexei here
Kovno, Polish-Lithuania here
Kozlov here
Kravchuk, Leonid here, here, here
Krivda (goddess) here
Kronstadt, Kotlin Island here; naval base rebellions (1917, 1921) here, here
Krüdener, Baroness de here
krugovaya poruka see collective responsibility
Krupskaya, Nadezhda here
Kuchuk Kainarji, Treaty of (1774) here, here, here
Kuibyshev here
Kuibyshev, Valerian here
kulaks here, here, here, here; ‘kulak operation’ here
Kulikovo, battle of (1380) here, here, here
Kuntsevo: Stalin’s house here
Kurbsky, Prince Andrei here, here
Kurbskys, the here
Kursk here, here, here
Kutuzov, Field Marshal Mikhail here, here, here
Kuznetsov, Mikhail here
labour camps see Gulag
Ladoga, Lake here, here
Ladoga, Old here, here
Laharpe, Frédéric here
Latvia/Latvians here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also Baltic states
La Valette, Charles, Marquis de here
Lavrov, Sergei here, here
Law Code (Ulozhenie) (1649) here, here, here
Lefort, Franz here
Leibniz, Gottfried here
Leipzig, Germany: battle (1813) here; 1848 revolt here
LendLease Agreement (1941) here
Lenin, Vladimir Ilich (Ulianov): birth and education here; and brother’s execution here; influences here, here; personality here; ideology here; publishes What Is to Be Done? here; and split in the SD Party here; and execution of imperial family here; failure of uprising due to his indecision here; flees to Finland here; calls for armed uprising here; returns to St Petersburg here; his role in the October Revolution here, here; leads Bolshevik government here; concludes peace with Germany here; wounded in assassination attempt here; brings in New Economic Policy here; bans factionalism here, here; and Stalin here, here, here; his Testament here; illness and death here, here, here; personality cult here, here, here, here; see also Leninism
Leningrad see St Petersburg
Leningrad (journal) here
Leninism here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Leontiev, Konstantin here
Levada, Yuri here
Levada Centre: 2020 poll here
Liberal Democrat Party (Russian) here
Lievens, the here
Likhachev, Dmitry: Russian Culture here
literature and writers here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Byzantine and Arab here; Church Slavonic here, here; French here; Polish here; translations here
Lithuania/Lithuanians here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also Baltic states; Polish-Lithuania
Liubech Conference (1097) here
Livonia here, here, here; battle of Lake Chud (1242) here; War (1558–83) here, here, here, here
Livonian Order of Teutonic Knights here
Lockhart, Robert Bruce here
Lomonosov, Mikhail here; Ancient Russian History here
lubok prints here; The Mice Are Burying the Cat here
Lutovinova, Varvara Petrovna here
Lviv, Ukraine here, here
Lvov, Prince Georgy here, here
Lysenko, Timofei here
Mabetex (company) here
Machiavelli, Niccolò: The Prince here
Magnitogorsk here
Maidan revolution (2014) here, here, here
Makary, Metropolitan of Moscow here, here, here, here
Makhno, Nestor, Commander-in-Chief here
Mamai Khan here
Manchuria here, here
Martov, Yuli here, here
Marx, Karl here, here, here, here
Marxism/Marxists here, here, here, here, here, here
Masurian Lakes, battle of the (1914) here
Mateev, Artamon here
Mazepa, Ivan here
media, the here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also television stations
Medvedev, Dmitry here, here
‘memory law’ here
Mensheviks here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Jews here
Menshikov, Prince Alexander here
Merkel, Angela here
mestnichestvo (placement) here, here
Methodius (monk) here, here
Metternich, Count Klemens von here
Mikhail I, Tsar (1596–1645) here, here, here, here
Mikhail, Prince of Tver here
Mikhail Alexandrovich, Grand Duke here, here
Mikhoels, Solomon here
Milan, Italy: 1848 revolt here
Military Revolutionary Committee (MRC) here, here
Miliukov, Pavel here, here
Milošević, Slobodan here
Miloslavskaya, Maria here
Minin, Kuzma here, here, here, here; monument to here
Minsk here, here
Minsk II Accords here
mir (peasant commune) here, here, here
Mlynář, Zdeněk here
Modern History of Russia, 1945–2006, The here
Mokosh (goddess) here, here
Moldavia and Wallachia, United Principalities of here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Moldova here, here
Molodaya Gvardiia (Young Guard) (journal) here
Molotov, Vyacheslav here
monasteries here, here, here, here, here, here
Mongolia here, here
Mongols, the: invasion of Kievan Rus here, here, here, here, here, here; and the Golden Horde here, here, here, here; establish indirect rule over Russia here; institute censuses here, and apanage system here; and Moscow here, here, here, here; dealings with Ivan I of Moscow here; fear of Lithuania here; postal system here; defeated by Prince Dmitry of Moscow at Kulikovo (1380) here, here, here; and sack of Moscow here; and weakening of the Golden Horde here; retreat from the Ugra (1480) here; final defeat by Ivan IV here; views on their impact and legacy here, here; influence on Ivan IV here
Monomakh, Cap of here, here
Monomakh, Vladimir here
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, Baron de: The Spirit of the Laws here
Mordvinian tribesmen here
Morozov, Boris here, here
Moscow here, here, here; and Kievan Rus here; first mention in chronicles (1147) here; myths about here, here, here; rivalry with Tver here, here; and the Mongols here, here, here; and the Church here; defeats Mongols at Kulikovo (1380) here, here, here; sacked by them here; defeats them at River Ugra here; and Mongol influences here, here, here; and crowning of Ivan IV here, here, here; expansion and wealth here, here; and conquest of Kazan here, here; burnt to the ground by Crimeans here; and the pretender tsar Dmitry here; boyar clans swear allegiance to Polish king here; liberated from the Poles by Pozharsky here; rebellion over salt tax here; bureaucracy expands here; and foreigners here; musketeers’ revolt here, here; and Peter the Great here; Jews here; and Napoleon here; and Slavophile intellectuals here; general strike (1905) here; celebrations at the end of the monarchy (1917) here; the Bolsheviks here; becomes capital of Russia (1918) here; and Denikin offensive here; strikes here, here; 1930s transformation here; in World War II here; and postwar reconstruction here; bombing of apartment buildings here; Putin’s unveiling of monument to Grand Prince Vladimir (2016) here, here, here, here, here; victory celebrations (2020) here
Archangel Cathedral here, here; Donskoi Monastery here; Dormition Cathedral here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Dzerzhinsky statue here; Foreign Ministry here; Hall of Columns here; Jewish Theatre here; Kremlin here, here, here; Lenin Mausoleum here; McDonald’s here; Memorial Society here; Metro here, here; ‘My History’ park here; Novodevichy Convent here; Pogonaya Meadow massacre (1570) here; press here, here; Red Square here, here, here, here, here, here, here; St Basil’s Cathedral here, here, here; Tenth Party Congress here, here; Tomb of the Unknown Soldier here; University here, here, here, here; the White House here, here; World Festival of Youth (1957) here
Moscow Herald here
Moscow River here
Moscow Workers’ Soviet here
MRC see Military Revolutionary Committee
Müller, Gerhard Friedrich here, here, here; Description of the Siberian Kingdom here; Origines gentis et nominis Russorum here; Sammlung Russischer Geschichte here
Münchengrätz Agreement (1833) here
Munich Security Conference (2007) here
Münnichs, the here
Muscovy here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
music and opera here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Muslims here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also Ottoman Empire; Turks
Mussorgsky, Modest: The Khovanshchina here
MVD here, here, here
‘My History’ parks here
myths: of Russian origins here, here, here, here, here, here; and Kievan Rus here; Ukrainian here, here, here; recurring themes here; of the tsar here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; of Holy Russia, defender of Christian principles here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; nationalist here, here; of Moscow here, here, here; and Ivan IV here; of Minin and Pozharsky here; and conquest of Siberia here; and the foundation of St Petersburg here; and Catherine II here; and ‘official nationality’ here, here; Pan-Slav here, here, here; and the peasantry here, here; and Lenin here; of Susanin here; Russian belief in here; of Russia as liberator of mankind here; legitimising the Soviet regime here, here, here, here; Putin’s use of here, here, here, here, here
Nagaya, Maria here
Nakhimov, Admiral Pavel here
Napoleon Bonaparte here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Napoleon III (Louis Napoleon) here, here
Narva, Estonia here, here
Naryshkina, Natalia here
Naryshkins, the here
national anthem, Russian here
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) here, here, here, here, here, here
Navalny, Alexei here
NEP see New Economic Policy
‘Nepmen’ here
Nerchinsk, Treaty of here
Nestor (monk) here, here
Neva, River here, here, here
Nevsky, Alexander here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
New Economic Policy (NEP) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
New York: Russian exiles here
New York Times here, here
Nicholas I, Tsar (1796–1855) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Nicholas II, Tsar (1868–1918) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Nikitenko, Alexander here
Nikolaev here
Nikolai Nikolaevich, Grand Duke here
Nikon, Patriarch here, here, here, here
Nizhny Novgorod here, here
NKVD here, here, here, here, here
Noah here
Nogais, the here
nomenklatura here
Norilsk Nickel (company) here
Normanist Controversy, the here
Novaya Zhizn (New Life) (newspaper) here
Novgorod here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; veche (town assembly) here, here
Novi, Alevise: Archangel Cathedral here
Novo-Ogarevo talks (1991) here, here
Novocherkassk: workers’ uprising here
Novoe Vremia (New Times) here, here
Novy Mir (New World) (journal) here, here
nuclear warfare here
Nystad, Treaty of (1721) here
Obolensky, Dimitri here, here
October Manifesto (1905) here, here, here
October Revolution (1917) here, here, here, here, here, here; anniversaries here, here
Octobrists here
Odessa, Ukraine here, here
Ögedai, Khan here, here
OGPU here, here, here, here, here, here, here
oil revenues here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Oka, River here
Okhotsk, Siberia here
Oleg, Prince here
Olga, Princess here
oligarchs here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Omsk here
opera see music and opera
Operation Barbarossa (1941) here
oprichniki (Ivan IV’s private army) here, here, here, here, here
oprichnina (confiscated lands) here, here
Ordzhonikidze, Sergo here
Orel here
Orenburg here
Orgburo (Organisational Bureau) here, here
Orlov, Count Grigory here
Orthodox Christianity see Eastern Orthodox Church
Orwell, George: Nineteen EightyFour here
Ossetia: North here; South here
Ostermanns, the here
Otrepov, Grigory here
Ottoman Empire/Ottomans here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also Turkey/Turks
paganism/pagans here, here, here, here, here, here
paintings here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also icons
Paleologues, the here
Palestine here, here
Palmerston, Henry Temple, 3rd Viscount here
Pan-Slavs here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Panin, General P. I. here
Paris here, here; revolutions here, here, here; Commune (1871) here; Russian exiles here
Paris, Treaty of (1856) here, here
Party Congresses: Second (1903) here; Tenth (1917) here; Eleventh (1922) here; Twelfth (1923) here; Thirteenth (1924) here; Seventeenth (1934) here; Twentieth (1956) here, here, here
Paskevich, Field Marshal Ivan here, here
Pasternak, Boris: Doctor Zhivago here
Patriotic War, the (1812–14) here; Great see World War, Second
Patrushev, Nikolai here
Paul I, Tsar (1754–1801) here, here, here, here
Pavlovsky, Gleb here
peasants: Slav here, here; and religion here, here; and boyars here; and the Mongols here, here, here, here, here; communes (mir) here, here; and the Grand Prince here; flee to the ‘wild lands’ of the south here, here; and collective responsibility here; and pomeshchiki here; their movement is restricted here; and kabala contracts here; and Law Code (1649) here; become serfs here, see serfdom/serfs; take flight here; and Razin rebellion (1670) here; under Peter the Great here, here, here; and Pugachev revolt here; as soldiers here, here, here; Slavophile ideas of here; and Tugenev’s Sketches from a Hunter’s Album here; and Emancipation Decree here; and zemstvos here; Populist belief in here, here; under Alexander III here; and nationalists’ movements here; migrate to towns here; agrarian revolution (1905) here, here, here, here, here; and the Duma here, here; in Kovno here; and Peasant Bank here; oppose break-up of communes here; and World War I here, here, here, here, here; revolution (1917) here, here, here, here, here; First All-Peasant Assembly (1917) here; in the Civil War here, here, here, here, here; uprisings here; and the New Economic Policy here, here, here, here; see also collective farms
Penza here
People’s Will, the (Narodnaya Volia) here, here, here
perestroika (structural reform) here, here
Pereyaslav, Ukraine: Treaty (1654) here
Perm here, here, here
Perun (god) here
Pestel, Colonel Pavel here, here; Russian Truth here
Peter the Great, Tsar (1682–1725) here, here; appearance here, here; travels abroad here, here; establishes new navy here; rebuilds the army here; his reforms here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; war against Sweden here, here; and St Petersburg here, here, here, here; adoption of title ‘Imperator’ here; as Tsar here, here; introduces new flag here; announces new Law of Succession here; Falconet’s equestrian statue of here
Peter II, Metropolitan of Kiev and All Rus here
Peter II, Tsar (1715–30) here
Peter III, Tsar (1728–62) here, here, here, here
Petrashevsky, Mikhail here
Petrograd see St Petersburg
Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies here
Petrov, Andrei here
Petrov, Vladimir: Peter the Great here
Piatakov, Georgy here
Piłsudski, Józef here
plague here, here; see also Black Death
Pobedonostsev, Konstantin here, here
Pogodin, Mikhail here
Pokrovsky, Mikhail here; Russian History here, here
Poland/Poles: at war with Russia here; and Mongols here, here, here; trade with Moscow here; backs pretender tsar Dmitry here, here; and a second false Dmitry here; at war with Sweden here; lays siege to Smolensk here; and Moscow boyars here; at war with Muscovites here, here; and Russo-Polish treaty (1618) here; at war with Cossacks here; Russia backs the Cossacks against here; and the Treaty of Andrusovo (1667) here; and Turkish raids on Ukraine here; as a channel to Russia for Western ideas here; and Tsar Alexei here; and Peter the Great here; and Napoleon here; as intermediary between Paris and St Petersburg here; uprising (1830) here, here; punished by Nicholas I here; and the Organic Statute (1832) here; and the French Republic here; and Alexander II’s Russification here; Socialists here; and Brest-Litovsky Treaty (1918) here; and Russian Civil War here; and Stalin’s false reports of invasion of Ukraine here; and the Great Terror here; and the Nazi-Soviet Pact here, here, here; Katyn massacre here; German invasion (1939) here; Red Army invasion here, here; publishes Khrushchev’s speech here; granted NATO membership here
Poland-Lithuania/Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Politburo here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Polotsk here, here
Polovtsians, the here, here, here, here
Poltava here; battle of (1709) here
Poludnitsa (goddess) here
pomeshchiki (military servitors) here, here, here, here
pomeste system (grants of land) here
Poniatowski, Stanisław here
Populism/Populists here, here, here, here
Poroshenko, Petro, President of Ukraine here, here, here
Potanin, Vladimir here
Potemkin (battleship) here
Potemkin, Prince Grigory here
‘power verticals’/‘vertical power’ here, here, here
Pozharsky, Prince Dmitry here, here, here, here; monument to here
Poznań, Poland here
Prague: 1848 revolt here
Pravda (goddess) here
pravda (justice) here, here
Pravda (newspaper) here, here
Primakov, Yevgeny here
Primary Chronicle here, here, here, here, here
Prokofiev, Sergei here, here
Provisional Governments here, here, here, here, here, here
Prus, ruler of Prussia here
Prussia/Prussians here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Pskov here, here, here, here, here
Pudovkin, Vsevolod: Minin and Pozharsky here
Pugachev, Emelian here, here
Pugachev rebellion (1773–4) here, here, here, here
Pugo, Boris here, here, here
Pushkin, Alexander here; The Bronze Horseman here; The History of Pugachev here; ‘Peter the Great’ here
Pustozersk fort, the Arctic here
Putiatina, Princess here
Putin, Vladimir: birth here; early career here; and the FSB here, here; as successor to Yeltsin here; political system here, here; his views and versions of Russian history here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and isolation by NATO here, here; his ‘Millennium Manifesto’ (1999) here; dominates TV stations and the media here, here, here; his oligarchs here, here; abolishes elections for regional governors here; imposes ‘power vertical’ here; and ‘sovereign democracy’ here; changes history-teaching in schools here; and ‘My History’ here; foreign policy after 2012 here; and the unveiling of Prince Vladimir’s monument (2016) here, here, here, here, here; and the ‘Russian world’ here; policy towards Ukraine here, here, here; and annexation of Crimea (2014) here, here, here, here, here, here, here; publishes ‘On the Historical Unity of the Ukrainians and the Russians’ (2021) here; and invasion of Ukraine (2022) here
Qashliq here
Radek, Karl here
Radishchev, Alexander here; Journey from St Petersburg to Moscow here
Railway Workers’ Union (Vikzhel) here, here
Rasputin, Grigory here, here, here
Rasputin, Valentin here
Razin, Stepan here
Razin rebellion (1670) here, here
Red Army here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Red Guards here, here, here, here, here
reindeer-herders here
Repin, Ilya: Ivan the Terrible and his Son Ivan on 16 November 1581 here; Manifest of 17 October here
requisitioning here, here, here, here, here, here; of grain here, here, here
Revel see Tallinn
Revolution, Russian (1917) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and the army here, here, here, here, here, here; see also October Revolution
RIANovosti (news agency) here
Riazan here, here, here, here, here, here
Ribbentrop, Joachim von here
Riga, Latvia here, here, here, here
RimskyKorsakov, Nikolai here
Riurik, Prince here, here
Riurikids here, here, here
Riutin, Martemyan here; ‘Stalin and the Crisis of the Proletarian Dictatorship’ (the Riutin Platform) here, here
Romania/Romanians here, here, here, here; see also Bucharest
Romanova, Anastasia here, here, here
Romanovs, the here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Rörik, Prince here
Roskin, Grigory here
Rostov-Suzdal here, here
Rozhanitsa (goddess) here, here
Rublev, Andrei here, here; Trinity here
Ruffo, Marco and Solari, Pietro Antonio: Hall of Facets here
Rus, the here, here, here, here, here
Russification here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Russo-Japanese war (1904–5) here, here
Russo-Polish treaty (1618) here
Russo-Swedish treaty (1617) here
Ruthenians here
Rykov, Alexei here
Ryzhkov, Nikolai here
Şahin Giray, Khan here
St Petersburg/Petrograd/Leningrad here; founded by Peter the Great here, here, here, here; the use of French in here, here, here; the nobility here, here, here, here; the Decembrists here; Petrashevsky’s ‘plot’ here; assassination of Alexander II (1881) here; workers petition the tsar here; ‘Bloody Sunday’ (1905) here, here; strike (1905) here; renamed Petrograd (1914) here; strike (1916) here; Russian Revolution (1917) here, here, here, here, here; German bombing here; capital transfers to Moscow here; further strikes (1921) here; and Stalin here, here; Lenin’s body displayed here; renamed Leningrad (1924) here; and World War II here, here; siege (1941–4) here; Putin’s birth (1952) here; renamed St Petersburg (1991) here Academy of Sciences here, here, here, here, here; The Bronze Horseman here, here; Coronation Hall here; equestrian statues of Peter the Great here, and Alexander III here; The Hermitage here; Imperial Theatre here; Memorial Society here; New Lessner machine-building plant here; Palace Square here, here; Peter and Paul Fortress here, here; Russian Academy here; Smolny Institute here, here, here, here; Tauride Palace here, here, here, here; University here; Winter Palace here, here, here, here, here, here; Znamenskaya Square here
saints, Russian see Eastern Orthodox Church
Sakharov, Andrei here
salt tax here, here
Saltykov, Sergei here
Saltykov-Shchedrin, Mikhail here
Saltykovs, the here
Samara here, here
Samarkand, Uzbekistan here
samizdat (self-publishing) here
Samoyeds, the here
Sarai here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Saratov here, here, here, here
Sazonov, Sergei here
Schlözer, August Ludwig von here
schools here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; history teaching in here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and Jewish admission here; military here, here; Soviet here, here, here, here
SDs, the see Social Democratic Labour Party
Second International (1916) here
Serafim of Sarov here
Serbia/Serbs here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
serfdom/serfs here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; factory here; household here; women here; army conscripts here, here, here; abolition of here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Sergiev-Posad here; Holy Trinity Church here
Sergius of Radonezh (monk) here, here
Serov, Valentin: Peter I, the Great here
Sevastopol, Ukraine here; siege of (1854–5) here, here, here
Seven Years’ War here, here
Seversk here
Shakespeare, William: Richard III here
Shliapnikov, Alexander here
Shlisselburg (Nöteborg) Fortress here, here
Shostakovich, Dmitri here
Shuisky, Prince Andrei here, here
Shuisky, Prince Vasily see Vasily IV, Tsar
Shuiskys, the here
Shushkevich, Stanislav here
Siberia here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Ermak’s expedition here; conquest of here; banishment to here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; tribes here, here; Müller’s study here; Decembrists here; army here, here, here; Urals–Siberian method here; Gulag labour camps here, here; oilfields here
Sigismund III Vasa, of Poland here
silk roads here, here
siloviki (‘men of force’) here
Silvester (priest) here
Simbirsk here, here
Simonov, Konstantin: ‘Kill Him!’ here
Slavophiles here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Slavs here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and Christianity here; and Church Slavonic here, here, here, here, here, here; see also Pan-Slavs
Smith, Adam here
Smolensk here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; monument to Grand Prince Vladimir here
Sobchak, Anatoly here
sobornost (spiritual union) here
Social Democratic Labour Party (the SDs) here, here, here, here, here, here
socialism here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Socialist Realist art here
Socialist Revolutionary Party (SRs) here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; see also Komuch
Solari, Pietro see Ruffo, Marco
Solovetsky Island here
Solovetsky Monastery here
Soloviev, Vladimir here
Solovyov, Sergei: History of Russia from the Earliest Times here
Solvychegodsk here
Solzhenitsyn, Alexander here, here; Gulag Archipelago here; One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich here
Solzhenitsyn, Natalia here
Sophia Alexeevna, Regent of Russia here
Sophia Paleologue here
Sovetskaya Rossiia (newspaper) here
Soviet of Workers’ Deputies here
Soviets here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Speransky, Mikhail here, here
SRs, the see Socialist Revolutionary Party
Staël, Madame Germaine de here
Stakhanov, Alexei/Stakhanovites here, here
Stalin, Joseph here, here; education here; appearance here; personality here, here, here, here; joins Georgian Social Democrats here; ‘a grey blur’ here; in the Civil War here, here; appointed general secretary of the Party by Lenin here, here; his growing power here; relies on OGPU here; purges the opposition here; forms triumvirate with Kamenev and Zinoviev to oppose Trotsky here, here; shocks and outrages Lenin here; abuses his wife here; and Lenin’s Testament here; benefits from the Lenin cult here; his ‘Great Oath’ speech here; gives up goal of exporting revolution here; and the economy here; calls for return to requisitioning here; his war against kulaks here, here; brings in collectivisation of farms here; his FiveYear Plans here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and Gulag labour camps here, here, here; completes the White Sea Canal here; and falsification of history here, here, here; and petitions here; believed in by the people here; and the Riutin Platform here; unhinged by wife’s suicide here; growing opposition to his policies here; and Kirov’s murder here; purges here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and the Great Terror and show trials here, here; delighted by Eisenstein’s films here; pact with Hitler (1939) here, here, here, here, here; and World War II here, here, here, here, here, here; and Eisenstein’s Ivan the Terrible here, here; on rape of German women by the Red Army here; his victory toast here; and Khrushchev here, here, here; death here; Gorbachev and here, here; Putin and here, here, here, here, here, here; and the Russian people today here, here; his cult here, here, here
Stalingrad see Volgograd
State Council here, here, here, here
Stavropol here
Stepashin, Sergei here
Stephen of Perm here
steppes, the here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Stolypin, Petr here, here, here
Stowe, Harriet Beecher: Uncle Tom’s Cabin here
Streletsky, Dmitry here
streltsy (musketeers) here, here
strikes here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Stroganovs, the here
Sukhanov, Nikolai: chronicle of the Russian Revolution here
Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union here, here, here
Surkov, Vladislav here, here
Susanin, Ivan here
Suslov, Mikhail here
Suvorov, General Alexander here, here
Suzdal here, here, here
Sviatoslav, ruler of Kievan Rus here
Sviazhsk here
Sweden/Swedes here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Syria here
Table of Ranks here
taiga, the here
Tale of Bygone Years see Primary Chronicle
Tale of the Destruction of Riazan by Batu, The here
Tale of the Princes of Vladimir, The here
Tallinn (Revel), Estonia here; Soviet war monument here
Tambov here
Tamerlane see Timur
tamizdat (publishing abroad) here
Tannenberg, battle of (1914) here
Tarkovsky, Andrei: Andrei Rublev here
Tarzan films here
Tatars here, here, here, here, here, here, here; army here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and origins of Russian words here, here; names here, here; Crimean here, here, here, here, here
taxation and tax collection: Khazar here, here; Kiev here, here; Novgorod here, here; Mongol here, here, here, here, here, here; Russian under Ivan I of Moscow here; under Ivan IV here, here; under Godunov here; in Nizhny Novgorod here; under Mikhail I here, here; on salt here, here, here; and collective responsibility here, here, here, here; and restriction on movement of peasants here, here; towards army costs here; poll or ‘soul’ (1718) here, here; under Biron here; and peasant communes here, here; and the zemtsvos here; and famine here; under the Bolsheviks and Lenin here, here; and the New Economic Policy here
Tbilisi/Tiflis, Georgia here, here
Tchaikovsky, Petr here
television stations here, here, here, here
Ternopil, Ukraine here
Teterins, the here
Teutons here
theatre(s) here, here, here
Third Department (of His Imperial Majesty’s Own Chancellery) here, here, here; Corps of Gendarmes here, here
Third Element here
Third International here, here
Tiflis see Tbilisi
Tilsit, Treaty of (1807) here
Timashuk, Lidiia here
Timur (Tamerlane) here, here
Tito, President Josip Broz here
Tiumen here
Tkachev, Petr here, here
Tobolsk here, here
Tokayev, KassymJomart, President of Kazakhstan here
Tokhtamysh, Khan here
Tolstoy, Leo here, here, here; Sevastopol Sketches here; War and Peace here, here, here
TOZ (collectives) here, here
trade unions here, here, here, here, here, here
Transylvania here, here
Trinity Lavra of St Sergius here
Triple Entente (1907–17) here, here
Trotsky, Leon here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Trubetskoi, Prince Nikolai here
Trudoviks here
Trump, President Donald here
Tsaritsyn here, here
tsars here, here, here, here, here, here, here; ‘littlefather’ (tsar-batiushka) here, here, here, here, here, here, here; petitioning of here, here, here, here; ‘pretender’ here, here, here
Tsarskoe Selo, palace at here, here
Tukhachevsky, Marshal Mikhail here
Tula here
tundra, the here, here
Tungus, the here
Turgenev, Ivan here, here, here, here, here; Sketches from a Hunter’s Album here
Turkey/Turks, the here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Turkic tribes here, here, here, here, here, here
Tushino here; rebellion (1905) here, here
Tvardovsky, Alexander: Vasily Terkin here
Tver here, here, here, here, here
Tyutchev, Fedor here
Uborevich, General Ieronim here
Udmurt here
Ugra, battle of the (1480) here
Ukraine/Ukrainians: as the Rus homeland here; and Mongol invasion here, here; as part of Poland-Lithuania here; and the Treaties of Pereyaslav (1654) and Andrusovo (1667) here; Turkish invasions here; as channel to Russia for Western ideas here; and the Russian Church here; and Russo-Swedish war (1701–21) here; under Russian rule here, here; as minority in Galicia (‘Ruthenians’) here, here; with a thriving culture in Lemberg (Lviv) here; and Russification campaign here; peasant uprisings (1905) here; and cholera epidemic (1907) here; of economic importance to Russia here; signs peace treaty with Germany and declares independence (1918) here; plundered by Austrian and German troops here; and the Russian Civil War here, here; peasant wars here; ‘terror-famine’ (1932–3) here; the Red Army’s war against nationalists here; and ethnic cleansing by NKVD here; postwar Russification by Stalin here; and Yakovlev here; independence movement here; and Gorbachev’s union treaty here, here; votes for independence here; and the collapse of the Soviet Union here, here; Putin’s views on here, here, here, here, here; censorship of historians here; ‘Orange Revolution’ (2004–5) here; Maidan revolution (2014) here, here, here; and Russia’s annexation of the Crimea (2014) here, here, here; Putin’s war against here; and NATO’s offer of membership here, here; and Putin’s unveiling of the monument to Grand Prince Vladimir (2016) here, here, here; Russian invasion (2022) here; see also Crimea, the; Donbass, the; Kiev
Ulianov, Alexander here, here
Union of Liberation here
Union of Unions here
United Nations here, here, here
United Nobility (landowners’ organisation) here
United Russia Party here, here
United States of America here, here, here, here, here; and Native Americans here; Belinsky on here; LendLease Agreement (1941–5) here; and Israel here; Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) here; nuclear arms race here; see also NATO
universities: Russian here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; and Jews here; Kazan here; Polish here, here
Ural mountains here, here, here, here, here, here
Urals-Siberian method here
Ustiug here
Uvarov, Sergei here
Uzbek, Khan here, here
Uzbekistan here
Vasily III, Tsar (1479–1533) here, here, here, here
Vasily IV, Tsar (1552–1612) here, here
Vasnetsov, Viktor: Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible here
Venice, Italy here; 1848 revolt here
Vernadsky, George here; A History of Russia here; The Mongols and Russia here
Viatka here, here
Victory Day (May 9th) here, here
Vienna here, here; battle of (1683) here; Congress (1814) 1814, here; 1848 revolt here
Vikings, the here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Vikshel see Railway Workers’ Union
Vilnius (Vilna), Lithuania here, here
Virgin Lands campaign (1954–63) here
Vitebsk here, here
Vladimir here; destroyed and conquered by Mongols here, here, here, here; grand princes of here, here, here, here; monument to Grand Prince Vladimir here
Vladimir, Grand Prince of Kievan Rus here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; unveiling of monument to (Moscow, 2016) here, here, here, here, here
Vladimir-Volhynia here
Vlasius, St here
Volga, River here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Volgograd (Stalingrad) here, here, here; Mother Russia Calls (statue) here
Volhynia here
Volos (god) here
Voloshin, Max here
Voltaire (Arouet) here, here, here, here
Vor (falso Tsar Dmitry) here
Voronezh here, here
vydvizhentsy (factory workers) here
Wałęsa, Lech here
Wallachia see Moldavia and Wallachia
walrus-hunters here
Warsaw, Poland here, here; 1830 revolution here, here; University students here
Warsaw Pact countries here, here
White (anti-Bolshevik) army here, here, here, here
White Sea Canal (Belomorkanal) here
Wilhelm II, Kaiser here, here
Witte, Count Sergei here, here
Władisław IV Vasa, king of Poland here
Władysław, Prince here
women here, here, here, here; serf here, here
Women’s Battalion of Death here
Workers’ Opposition here, here, here, here
World Wars: First here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here; Second here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Wrangel, General Petr here
Writers’ Union here
Yagoda, Genrikh here, here
Yaik Host here
Yakir, General Iona here
Yakovlev, Alexander here, here, here
Yakuts, the here
Yakutsk, Siberia here
Yaik Cossacks here
Yanaev, Gennady here, here
Yanukovich, Viktor here, here, here
Yaroslav, Prince here
Yeltsin, Boris here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
Yezhov, Nikolai here, here
Yudenich, General Nikolai here
Yukos (oil company) here, here
Yuri Vasilievich of Uglich here
Yushchenko, Viktor here
Yusupov, Felix here
Zaporozhian Host, the here, here
Zelensky, Volodymyr, President of Ukraine here, here, here, here
Zemgor (network of public bodies) here
zemstvos (rural councils) here, here, here, here
Zhdanov, Andrei here, here, here
Zhukov, General Georgy here, here
Zinoviev, Grigory here, here, here, here, here
‘Zinoviev Letter’ here
Zoshchenko, Mikhail here
Zosima (monk) here
Zubov, Alexei: The Ceremonial Entry of the Russian Troops to Moscow … after … the Battle of Poltava here
Zvenigorod here
Zvezda (journal) here
Zyuganov, Gennady here
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the following people: Peter Straus, Melanie Jackson, Stephen Edwards and the rest of the team at RCW; Stella Tillyard and Christopher Wyld, the first readers of my early draft; Alexis Kirschbaum and her team at Bloomsbury – Jasmine Horsey, Stephanie Rathbone, Lauren Whybrow, Jonny Coward, Peter James, the copy-editor, Mike Athanson, the map-maker, Jo Carlill, the picture researcher, Catherine Best and Genista Tate-Alexander; and at Metropolitan my beloved editor, Sara Bershtel and her team – Brian Lax, Carolyn O’Keefe and Christopher Sergio.
A Note on the Author
Orlando Figes is an award-winning author and historian, who has held teaching posts at Birkbeck College, University of London and Trinity College, University of Cambridge. He was born in London in 1959 and studied History at the University of Cambridge. Figes is the bestselling author of nine books on Russian and European history, including Natasha’s Dance and A People’s Tragedy. His books have been translated into over thirty languages.
Plate Images
Putin opens the monument to Grand Prince Vladimir – in his words the ‘founder of the modern Russian state’ – near the Moscow Kremlin on November 4, 2016. It is a metre taller than the nineteenth-century statue of Volodymyr in Kiev where the grand prince is seen as the founder of ‘the European state of Rus-Ukraine’.
Viktor Vasnetsov, The Invitation of the Varangians: Rurik and his Brothers Arrive at Old Ladoga (1912), a fanciful depiction of the Normanist foundation myth in which the Viking leader was invited by the Slavs to establish order in their lands.
The Church of St Sophia, Kiev, built in the reign of Grand Prince Yaroslav (1019–54). It is closely modelled on the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople, the source of Russia’s Orthodox Christianity.
The Iconostasis, or wall of icons, separates the altar from the main part of the church – in this case the Kremlin’s Dormition Cathedral, where Russia’s tsars were crowned. The placement of the icons is symbolically significant. The Mother of God and Christ Pantokrator, the most sacred icons, are on the left and right, respectively, of the ‘royal doors’, a symbol of the gates of Jerusalem, in the middle of the screen.
An example of the birch-bark writing found by archaeologists in Novgorod.
Andrei Rublev’s Trinity (between 1408 and 1425), a supreme example of the Russian icon-painting tradition. Seeing is believing for the Orthodox. Russians pray with their eyes open, their gaze fixed on an icon, which serves as a window onto the divine sphere.
The Solovetsky Monastery. Founded on an island in the White Sea in 1463, the monastery was used as a prison camp after 1917.
Part of the Kremlin complex. The Dormition Cathedral (centre) and the Hall of Facets (left) were built by Italian architects in the late fifteenth century but were later Russified.
The Blessed Host of the Heavenly Tsar was painted in the 1550s to commemorate the conquest of Kazan by Ivan the Terrible. Known as the Church Militant, it is almost four metres in length. The icon shows the mounted figure of Ivan following the Archangel Michael in a procession of Russian troops from the hell-like burning city of Kazan to Moscow, depicted here to resemble Jerusalem, where they are welcomed by the Mother of God with the infant Jesus. It was a statement of Moscow’s mythic status as the Third Rome, the last true seat of Christianity, and of Ivan’s claim of descent from the Byzantine emperors.
Vasily Surikov, Ermak’s Conquest of Siberia (1895). Armed with muskets, Ermak’s Cossacks are too strong for the Tatars with their bows and arrows in this reimagination of the Russian capture of Qashliq, the capital of the Siberian khanate.
Ilya Repin, Ivan the Terrible and his Son Ivan on 16 November 1581 (1885). The remorseful tsar, haunted by his own destructive terror, captured the imagination of many artists from the nineteenth century.
Viktor Vasnetsov, Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible (1897), an iconic image of the ‘Russian tsar’, terrible and fierce with an all-seeing eye.
Tsar Alexei (unknown artist, 1670s), one of the first portraits of a tsar known to bear a likeness to the subject.
Putin at the Minin and Pozharsky monument, a symbol of the people’s sacrifice united by religion and devotion to the motherland.
Valentin Serov, Peter I the Great (1907). Peter was a man in a hurry. Almost seven feet in height, he walked with giant, rapid strides, leaving his advisers far behind.
Godfrey Kneller, Peter the Great, Tsar of Russia (1698), a portrait presented by the tsar to the King of England William III during his Grand Embassy. The European image of the tsar, dressed in armour with a Western crown and cloak and imperial regalia, represents a stark contrast to the portrait of Alexei, Peter’s father, painted only twenty years earlier.
Alexei Zubov, The Ceremonial Entry of the Russian Troops to Moscow on December 21, 1709 after their Victory in the Battle of Poltava (1711). Moscow here is reimagined in the form of ancient Rome. None of the triumphant arches in the illustration existed.
The Mice are Burying the Cat (Lubok print, c.1760), a popular satire on the foreign manners of the deceased Tsar Peter.
Vigilius Eriksen, Equestrian Portrait of Catherine II (1729–96) the Great of Russia (18th century). Catherine’s love of horses gave rise to the absurd myth that she was killed by one in the act of copulation.
The Bronze Horseman, Étienne-Maurice Falconet’s equestrian statue of Peter the Great (1782), a source of many myths about St Petersburg and the nature of imperial power in Russia.
Ilya Repin, 17 October 1905 (1907), an idealistic image of the people’s revolutionary unity.
Peasants of a northern Russian village, 1890s. Note the lack of shoes and the uniformity of their clothing and their houses. This was the ‘communal harmony’ imagined by the Slavophiles and Populists.
Ivanovo textile mill, 1905. Women and children were heavily employed in the textile industry.
Nicholas II and the Empress Alexandra with their haemophiliac son, the tsarevich Alexei, during the Romanov tercentenary celebrations of 1913 in Moscow. The jubilee cemented the Romanov myth of a mystical union between tsar and people.
That myth collapsed in the revolution of February 1917, when Romanov symbols and statues were destroyed. The head here belonged to a statue of Alexander III in Moscow.
Fedor Shurpin, Morning of our Motherland (1948), a classic example of socialist realist portraiture in the service of the leader cult. Stalin’s gaze is fixed ahead, beyond the frame, to a future only he can see.
Irakli Toidze, Mother Russia Calls (1941). The mother shows a military oath and calls on Russia’s sons to defend her from the enemy.
A United Russia party electoral poster (2003). The map of Russia is filled with portraits of historic Russian figures, including Stalin – the first time he appeared in Putin’s historical mythology.
Part of Alexander Nevsky’s exhibit in the St Petersburg ‘My History’ park. The panels on the left emphasise the role of Nevsky in defending Russia from ‘the aggression of the West’, while those on the right show his statesmanship in forging new alliances with the Mongols and Asia.
BLOOMSBURY PUBLISHING
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
50 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3DP, UK
29 Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland
BLOOMSBURY, BLOOMSBURY PUBLISHING and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
First published in Great Britain 2022
This electronic edition first published in 2022
Copyright © Orlando Figes, 2022
Orlando Figes has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Author of this work
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers
Every reasonable effort has been made to trace copyright holders of material reproduced in this book, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publishers would be glad to hear from them.
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN: HB: 978-1-5266-3174-9; TPB: 978-1-5266-3176-3; EBOOK: 978-1-5266-3167-1; EPDF: 978-1-5266-5689-6
To find out more about our authors and books visit www.bloomsbury.com and sign up for our newsletters