Учись как профи

Рекомендуемая литература

Плутарх. Сочинения. СПб.: Издательство Санкт-Петербургского университета, 2008.

Bligh D. What’s the Use of Lectures? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.

Cerbin W. Improving Student Learning from Lectures // Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 2021. June. Vol. 4. № 3. Pp. 151–163 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/stl0000113.

deWinstanley P. A., Bjork R. A. Successful Lecturing: Presenting Information in Ways That Engage Effective Processing // New Directions for Teaching & Learning. 2002. Spring. № 89. Pp. 19–31 // dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.44.

Landrum R. E. Teacher-Ready Research Review: Clickers // Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 2015. September. Vol. 1. № 3. Pp. 250–254. // dx.doi.org/10.1037/stl0000031.

Raver S. A., Maydosz A. S. Impact of the Provision and Timing of Instructor-Provided Notes on University Students’ Learning // Active Learning in Higher Education. 2010. November. Vol. 11. № 3. Pp. 189–200 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379682.

Shernoff D. J., Sannella A. J., Schorr R. Y. et al. Separate Worlds: The Influence of Seating Location on Student Engagement, Classroom Experience, and Performance in the Large University Lecture Hall // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2017. April. Vol. 49. Pp. 55–64 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2016.12.002.

Worthington D. L., Levasseur D. G. To Provide or Not to Provide Course PowerPoint Slides? The Impact of Instructor-Provided Slides upon Student Attendance and Performance // Computers & Education. 2015. July. Vol. 85. Pp. 14–22 // researchgate.net/publication/273400767_To_provide_or_not_to_provide_course_PowerPoint_slides_The_impact_of_instructor-provided_slides_upon_student_attendance_and_performance.

Carter S. P., Greenberg K., Walker M. S. The Impact of Computer Usage on Academic Performance: Evidence from a Randomized Trial at the United States Military Academy // Economics of Education Review. 2017. February. Vol. 56. Pp. 118–132 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.12.005.

Flanigan A. E., Titsworth S. The Impact of Digital Distraction on Lecture Note Taking and Student Learning // Instructional Science. 2020. October. Vol. 48. № 5. Pp. 495–524 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09517-2.

Gaudreau P., Miranda D., Gareau A. Canadian University Students in Wireless Classrooms: What Do They Do on Their Laptops and Does It Really Matter? // Computers & Education. 2014. January. Vol. 70. Pp. 245–255 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.019.

Luo L., Kiewra K. A., Flanigan A. E., Peteranetz M. S. Laptop Versus Longhand Note Taking: Effects on Lecture Notes and Achievement // Instructional Science. 2018. December. Vol. 46. № 6. Pp. 947–971 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9458-0.

Mueller P. A., Oppenheimer D. M. The Pen Is Mightier than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand over Laptop Note Taking // Psychological Science. 2014. June. Vol. 25. № 6. Pp. 1159–1168 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581.

Peverly S. T., Garner J. K.,Vekaria P. C. Both Handwriting Speed and Selective Attention Are Important to Lecture Note-Taking // Reading and Writing. 2014. January. Vol. 27. № 1. Pp. 1–30 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9431-x.

Peverly S. T., Vekaria P. C., Reddington L. A. et al. The Relationship of Handwriting Speed, Working Memory, Language Comprehension and Outlines to Lecture Note-Taking and Test-Taking Among College Students // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2013. January — February 27. № 1. Pp. 115–126 // dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2881.

Phillips N. E., Ralph B. C. W., Carriere J. S. A., Smilek D. Examining the Influence of Saliency of Peer-Induced Distractions on Direction of Gaze and Lecture Recall // Computers & Education. 2014. August. Vol. 99. Pp. 81–93 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.006.

Piolat A., Olive T., Kellogg R. T. Cognitive Effort During Note Taking // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2005. April. Vol. 19. № 3. Pp. 291–312 // dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086.

Reed D. K., Rimel H., Hallett A. Note-Taking Interventions for College Students: A Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of the Literature // Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2016. January. Vol. 9. № 3. Pp. 307–333 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1105894.

Sana F., Weston T., Cepeda N. J. Laptop Multitasking Hinders Classroom Learning for Both Users and Nearby Peers // Computers & Education. 2013. March. Vol. 62. Pp. 24–31 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003.

Urry H. L. et al. Don’t Ditch the Laptop Just Yet: A Direct Replication of Mueller and Oppenheimer’s (2014) Study 1 Plus Mini Meta-Analyses Across Similar Studies // Psychological Science. 2021. March. Vol. 32. № 3. Pp. 326–339 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797620965541.

Will P., Bischof W. F., Kingstone A. The Impact of Classroom Seating Location and Computer Use on Student Academic Performance // PLOS ONE. 2020. August 5. Vol. 15. № 8. P. e0236131 // dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236131.

Williams A., Birch E., Hancock P. The Impact of Online Lecture Recordings on Student Performance // Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2012. Vol. 28. № 2. Pp. 199–213 // dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.869.

Brooks C. M., Ammons J. L. Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments // Journal of Education for Business. 2003. May. Vol. 78. № 5. Pp. 268–272 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832320309598613.

Ericsson A., Pool R. Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2016.

Ho V. Learning by Doing // Encyclopedia of Health Economics, ed. by A. J. Culyer. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014. Pp. 141–145.

Holyoak K. J., Stamenković D. Metaphor Comprehension: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence // Psychological Bulletin. 2018. June. Vol. 144. № 6. Pp. 641–671. // dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000145.

Long N., Kuhl B. A., Chun M. M. Memory and Attention // Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. 4th ed. Vol. 1. Language and Memory, ed. by E. Phelps, L. Davachi. New York: Wiley, 2018. Pp. 285–321.

Morris C. D., Bransford J. D., Franks J. J. Levels of Processing Versus Transfer Appropriate Processing // Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1997. October. Vol. 16. № 5. Pp. 519–533 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9.

Tulving E., Thompson D. M. Encoding Specificity and Retrieval Processes in Episodic Memory // Psychological Review. 1973. September. Vol. 80. № 5. Pp. 352–373 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0020071.

Bower G. H., Clark M. C., Lesgold A. M., Winzenz D. Hiearchical Retrieval Schemes in Recall of Categorized Word Lists // Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1969. June. Vol. 8. № 3. Pp. 323–343 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80124-6.

Chularut P., DeBacker T. K. The Influence of Concept Mapping on Achievement, Self-Regulation, and Self-Efficacy in Students of English as a Second Language // Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2004. July. Vol. 29. № 3. Pp. 248–263 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.001.

Cohen D., Kim E., Tan J., Winkelmes M. A. A Note-Restructuring Intervention Increases Students’ Exam Scores // College Teaching. 2013. July. Vol. 61. № 3. Pp. 95–99 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2013.793168.

Crawford C. C. The Correlation Between College Lecture Notes and Quiz Papers // Journal of Educational Research. 1925. Vol. 12. № 4. Pp. 282–291 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1925.10879600.

Kiewra K. A. Note Taking on Trial: A Legal Application of Note-Taking Research // Educational Psychology Review. 2016. June. Vol. 28. № 2. Pp. 377–384 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9353-z.

Kiewra K. A., Benton S. L. The Relationship Between Information-Processing Ability and Notetaking // Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1988. January. Vol. 13. № 1. Pp. 33–44 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(88)90004-5.

Luo L., Kiewra K. A., Samuelson L. Revising Lecture Notes: How Revision, Pauses, and Partners Affect Note Taking and Achievement // Instructional Science. 2016. February. Vol. 44. Pp. 45–67 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9370-4.

Makany T., Kemp J., Dror I. E. Optimising the Use of Note-Taking as an External Cognitive Aid for Increasing Learning // British Journal of Educational Technology. 2009. July. Vol. 40. № 4. Pp. 619–635 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8535.2008.00906.x.

Rachal K. C., Daigle S., Rachal W. S. Learning Problems Reported by College Students: Are They Using Learning Strategies? // Journal of Instructional Psychology. 2007. December. Vol. 34. № 4. Pp. 191–199.

Bartoszewski B. L., Gurung R. A. R. Comparing the Relationship of Learning Techniques and Exam Score // Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 2015. September. Vol. 1. № 3. Pp. 219–228 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/stl0000036.

Bohay M., Blakely D. P., Tamplin A. K., Radvansky G. A. Note Taking, Review, Memory, and Comprehension // American Journal of Psychology. 2011. Spring. Vol. 124. № 1. Pp. 63–73 // dx.doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0063.

Denton C. A., Wolters C. A., York M. J. et al. Adolescents’ Use of Reading Comprehension Strategies: Differences Related to Reading Proficiency, Grade Level, and Gender // Learning and Individual Differences. 2015. January. Vol. 37. Pp. 81–95 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.016.

Glenberg A. M., Wilkinson A. C., Epstein W. The Illusion of Knowing: Failure in the Self-Assessment of Comprehension // Memory & Cognition. 1982. November. Vol. 10. № 6. Pp. 597–602 // dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03202442.

Gurung R. A. R. How Do Students Really Study (and Does It Matter)? // Teaching of Psychology. 2005. Vol. 32. № 4. Pp. 239–241.

Gurung R. A. R., Daniel D. B. Evidence-Based Pedagogy: Do Pedagogical Features Enhance Student Learning? // Best Practices for Teaching Introduction to Psychology, ed. by D. S. Dunn, S. L. Chew. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005. Pp. 41–55.

Gurung R. A. R., Weidert J., Jeske A. Focusing on How Students Study // Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2010. January. Vol. 10. № 1. Pp. 28–35 // files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ882123.pdf.

Jairam D., Kiewra K. A., Rogers-Kasson S., Patterson-Hazley M., Marxhausen K. SOAR Versus SQ3R: A Test of Two Study Systems // Instructional Science. 2014. May. Vol. 42. № 3. Pp. 409–420 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9295-0.

McDaniel M. A., Howard D. C., Einstein G. O. The Read-Recite-Review Study Strategy: Effective and Portable // Psychological Science. 2009. April. Vol. 20. № 4. Pp. 516–522 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2009.02325.x.

Nist S. L., Kirby K. The Text Marking Patterns of College Students // Reading Psychology. 1989. Fall. Vol. 10. № 4. Pp. 321–338 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/0270271890100403.

Otero J., Kintsch W. Failures to Detect Contradictions in a Text: What Readers Believe Versus What They Read // Psychological Science. 1992. July. Vol. 3. № 4. Pp. 229–235 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.1992.tb00034.x.

Rayner K… Schotter E. R, Masson M. E. J. et al. So Much to Read, So Little Time: How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help? // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2016. May. Vol. 17. № 1. Pp. 4–34 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100615623267.

Бэддели А. Ваша память. Руководство по тренировке и развитию. М.: Эксмо-Пресс, 2001.

Alfieri L., Nokes-Malach T. J., Schunn C. D. Learning Through Case Comparisons: A Meta-analytic Review // Educational Psychologist. 2013. Vol. 48. № 2. Pp. 87–113 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775712.

Blasiman R. N., Dunlosky J., Rawson K. A. The What, How Much, and When of Study Strategies: Comparing Intended Versus Actual Study Behaviour // Memory. 2017. July. Vol. 25. № 6. Pp. 784–792 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1221974.

Callender A. A., McDaniel M. A. The Limited Benefits of Rereading Educational Texts // Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2009. January. Vol. 34. № 1. Pp. 30–41 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.07.001.

Catrambone R. The Subgoal Learning Model: Creating Better Examples to Improve Transfer to Novel Problems // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1998. December. Vol. 127. № 4. Pp. 355–376 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.4.355.

Dunlosky J., Rawson K. A., Marsh E. J., Nathan M. J., Willingham D. T. Improving Students’ Learning with Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions from Cognitive and Educational Psychology // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2013. January. Vol. 14. № 1. Pp. 4–58 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266.

Fernandes M. A., Wammes J. D., Meade M. E. The Surprisingly Powerful Influence of Drawing on Memory // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2018. October. Vol. 27. № 5. Pp. 302–308 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721418755385.

Margulieux L. E., Catrambone R. Improving Problem Solving with Subgoal Labels in Expository Text and Worked Examples // Learning and Instruction. 2016. April. Vol. 42. Pp. 58–71 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.002.

Rawson K. A., Dunlosky J., Sciartelli S. M. The Power of Successive Relearning: Improving Performance on Course Exams and Long-Term Retention // Educational Psychology Review. 2013. December. Vol. 25. № 4. Pp. 523–548 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9240-4.

Tauber S. K., Witherby A. E., Dunlosky J. et al. Does Covert Retrieval Benefit Learning of Key-Term Definitions? // Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2018. March. Vol. 7. № 1. Pp. 106–115 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.10.004.

Willingham D. T. Does Tailoring Instruction to ‘Learning Styles’ Help Students Learn? // American Educator. 2018. Summer. Vol. 42. № 2. Pp. 28–36 // files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1182080.pdf.

Yang C., Luo L., Vadillo M. A., Yu R., Shanks D. R. Testing (Quizzing) Boosts Classroom Learning: A Systematic and Meta-analytic Review // Psychological Bulletin. 2021. April. Vol. 147. № 4. Pp. 399–435 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309.

Bjork E. L., Bjork R. A. Making Things Hard on Yourself, but in a Good Way: Creating Desirable Difficulties to Enhance Learning // Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, ed. by M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, J. R. Pomerantz. New York: FABBS Foundation, 2009. Pp. 56–64.

Dougherty K. M., Johnston J. M. Overlearning, Fluency, and Automaticity // Behavior Analyst. 1996. October. Vol. 19. № 2. Pp. 289–292 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03393171.

Hertzog C., Hines J. C., Touron D. R. Judgments of Learning Are Influenced by Multiple Cues in Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy // Archives of Scientific Psychology. 2013. Vol. 1. № 1. Pp. 23–32 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/arc0000003.

Kornell N., Hausman H. Performance Bias: Why Judgments of Learning Are Not Affected by Learning // Memory & Cognition. 2017. November. Vol. 45. № 8. Pp. 1270–1280 // dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0740-1.

Roelle J., Schmidt E. M., Buchau A., Berthold K. Effects of Informing Learners About the Dangers of Making Overconfident Judgments of Learning // Journal of Educational Psychology. 2017. January. Vol. 109. № 1. Pp. 99–117.

Schwartz B. L., Metcalfe J. Metamemory: An Update of Critical Findings // Cognitive Psychology of Memory. Vol. 2. A Comprehensive Reference, ed. by J. H. Byrne. Oxford, UK: Academic Press, 2017. Pp. 423–432.

Shanks L. L., Serra M. J. Domain Familiarity as a Cue for Judgments of Learning // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2014. April. Vol. 21. № 2. Pp. 445–453 // dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0513-1.

Soderstrom N. C., Bjork R. A. Learning Versus Performance: An Integrative Review // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2015. March. Vol. 10. № 2. Pp. 176–199 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000.

Witherby A. E., Tauber S. K. The Influence of Judgments of Learning on Long-Term Learning and Short-Term Performance // Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2017. December. Vol. 6. № 4. Pp. 496–503.

Archer N. S., Pippert R. Don’t Change the Answer!: An Exposé of the Perennial Myth That the First Choices Are Always the Correct Ones // The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 1962. Vol. 37. № 1. Pp. 39–41 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1962.11476207.

Bourassa K. J., Ruiz J. M., Sbarra D. A. The Impact of Physical Proximity and Attachment Working Models on Cardiovascular Reactivity: Comparing Mental Activation and Romantic Partner Presence // Psychophysiology. 2019. May. Vol. 56. № 5. Pp. 1–12 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13324.

Bramão I., Karlsson A., Johansson M. Mental Reinstatement of Encoding Context Improves Episodic Remembering // Cortex. 2017. September. Vol. 94. Pp. 15–26 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.007.

Calma-Birling D., Gurung R. A. R. Does a Brief Mindfulness Intervention Impact Quiz Performance? // Psychology Learning & Teaching. 2017. November. Vol. 16. № 3. Pp. 323–335 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/1475725717712785.

Copeland D. A. Should Chemistry Students Change Answers on Multiple-Choice Tests? // Journal of Chemical Education. 1972. April. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 258 // dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed049p258.

DiBattista D., Sinnige-Egger J.-A., Fortuna G. The ‘None of the Above’ Option in Multiple-Choice Testing: An Experimental Study // Journal of Experimental Education. 2014. Vol. 82. № 2. Pp. 168–183 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.795127.

Embse N. von der, Barterian J., Segool N. Test Anxiety Interventions for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Treatment Studies from 2000–2010 // Psychology in the Schools. 2013. January. Vol. 50. № 1. Pp. 57–71 // dx.doi.org/10.1002/PITS.21660.

Erdelyi M. H. The Recovery of Unconscious Memories: Hypermnesia and Reminiscence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

Kruger J., Wirtz D., Miller D. T. Counterfactual Thinking and the First Instinct Fallacy // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005. May. Vol. 88. № 5. Pp. 725–735.

Pichert J. W., Anderson R. C. Taking Different Perspectives on a Story // Journal of Educational Psychology. 1977. August. Vol. 69. № 4. Pp. 309–315 // experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/taking-different-perspectives-on-a-story.

Schwarz S. P., McMorris R. F., DeMers L. P. Reasons for Changing Answers: An Evaluation Using Personal Interviews // Journal of Educational Measurement. 1991. June. Vol. 28. № 2. Pp. 163–171 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745–3984.1991.tb00351.x.

Smith S. M., Handy J. D. Effects of Varied and Constant Environmental Contexts on Acquisition and Retention // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2014. November. Vol. 40. № 6. Pp. 1582–1593.

Vispoel W. P. Reviewing and Changing Answers on Computerized Fixed-Item Vocabulary Tests // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2000. June. Vol. 60. № 3. Pp. 371–384 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970600.

Дуэк К. Гибкое сознание. Новый взгляд на психологию развития взрослых и детей. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2018.

Black P., Wiliam D. Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment // Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2009. Vol. 21. № 5. Pp. 5–31 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.

Kornell N., Metcalfe J. The Effects of Memory Retrieval, Errors and Feedback on Learning // Applying Science of Learning in Education: Infusing Psychological Science into the Curriculum, ed. by V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, C. M. Hakala. Washington, DC: Division 2, American Psychological Association, 2014. Pp. 225–251 // columbia.edu/cu/psychology/metcalfe/PDFs/Kornell2013.pdf.

Mayer R. E. Rote Versus Meaningful Learning // Theory into Practice. 2002. Autumn. Vol. 41. № 4. Pp. 226–232 // dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4.

Morrison F. J., Kim M. H., Connor C. M., Grammer J. K. The Causal Impact of Schooling on Children’s Development: Lessons for Developmental Science // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2019. October. Vol. 28. № 5. Pp. 441–449 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721419855661.

Roberts D. M. An Empirical Study on the Nature of Trick Test Questions // Journal of Educational Measurement. 1993. December. Vol. 30. № 4. Pp. 331–344 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/J.1745–3984.1993.TB00430.X.

Shute V. J. Focus on Formative Feedback // Review of Educational Research. 2008. March. Vol. 78. № 1. Pp. 153–189 // dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795.

Simons D. J., Boot W. R., Charness N. C. et al. Do ‘Brain Training’ Programs Work? // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2016. October. Vol. 17. № 3. Pp. 103–186.

Astill R. G., Van der Heijden K. B., Van IJzendoorn M. H., Van Someren E. J. W. Sleep, Cognition, and Behavioral Problems in School-Age Children: A Century of Research Meta-Analyzed // Psychological Bulletin. 2012. November. Vol. 138. № 6. Pp. 1109–1138 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028204.

Buehler R., Griffin D., Ross M. Exploring the ‘Planning Fallacy’: Why People Underestimate Their Task Completion Times // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994. September. Vol. 67. № 3. Pp. 366–381 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366.

Cain N., Gradisar M. Electronic Media Use and Sleep in School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Review // Sleep Medicine. 2010. September. Vol. 11. № 8. Pp. 735–742 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2010.02.006.

Crovitz H. F., Daniel W. F. Measurements of Everyday Memory: Toward the Prevention of Forgetting // Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1984. November. Vol. 22. № 5. Pp. 413–414 // dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03333861.

Gollwitzer P. M., Kentaro F., Oettingen G. Planning and the Implementation of Goals // Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications, ed. by R. F. Baumeister, K. D. Vohs. New York: Guilford, 2004. Pp. 211–228.

Gomez Fonseca A., Genzel L. Sleep and Academic Performance: Considering Amount, Quality and Timing // Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2020. June. Vol. 33. Pp. 65–71 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.12.008.

Hartwig M. K., Dunlosky J. Study Strategies of College Students: Are Self-Testing and Scheduling Related to Achievement? // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2012. February. Vol. 19. № 1. Pp. 126–134 // dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y.

Kornell N., Bjork R. A. The Promise and Perils of Self-Regulated Study // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2007. April. Vol. 14. № 2. Pp. 219–224 // dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03194055.

Krause A. J., Simon E. B., Mander B. A. et al. The Sleep-Deprived Human Brain // Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2017. July. Vol. 18. № 7. Pp. 404–418 // dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.55.

Kross E., Bruehlman-Senecal E., Park J. et al. Self-Talk as a Regulatory Mechanism: How You Do It Matters // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2014. February. Vol. 106. № 2. Pp. 304–324 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035173.

Shirtcliff E. A., Allison A. L., Armstrong J. M. et al. Longitudinal Stability and Developmental Properties of Salivary Cortisol Levels and Circadian Rhythms from Childhood to Adolescence // Developmental Psychobiology. 2012. July. Vol. 54. № 5. Pp. 493–502 // dx.doi.org/10.1002/dev.20607.

Ariely D., Wertenbroch K. Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment // Psychological Science. 2002. May. Vol. 13. № 3. Pp. 219–224 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00441.

Barrera M. Jr., Ainlay S. L. The Structure of Social Support: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis // Journal of Community Psychology. 1983. April. Vol. 11. № 2. Pp. 133–143 // dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198304)11:2<133::AID-JCOP2290110207>3.0.CO;2-L.

Frederick S., Novemsky N., Wang J., Dhar R., Nowlis S. Opportunity Cost Neglect // Journal of Consumer Research. 2009. December. Vol. 36. № 4. Pp. 553–561 // dx.doi.org/10.1086/599764.

Krause K., Freund A. M. It’s in the Means: Process Focus Helps Against Procrastination in the Academic Context // Motivation and Emotion. 2016. June. Vol. 40. № 3. Pp. 422–437 // dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9541-2.

Lally P., van Jaarsveld C. H. M., Potts H. W. W., Wardle J. How Are Habits Formed: Modelling Habit Formation in the Real World // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2010. October. Vol. 40. № 6. Pp. 998–1009 // dx.doi.org/10.1002/EJSP.674.

Lickel B., Kushlev K., Savalei V., Matta S., Schmader T. Shame and the Motivation to Change the Self // Emotion. 2014. December. Vol. 14. № 6. Pp. 1049–1061 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/A0038235.

Neal D. T., Wood W., Labrecque J. S., Lally P. How Do Habits Guide Behavior? Perceived and Actual Triggers of Habits in Daily Life // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012. March. Vol. 48. № 2. Pp. 492–498 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.011.

Ruby M. B., Dunn E. W., Perrino A., Gillis R., Viel S. The Invisible Benefits of Exercise // Health Psychology. 2011. January. Vol. 30. № 1. Pp. 67–74 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021859.

Steel P. The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure // Psychological Bulletin. 2007. January. Vol. 133. № 1. Pp. 65–94 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65.

Strunk K. K., Steele M. R. Relative Contributions of Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulation, and Self-Handicapping in Predicting Student Procrastination // Psychological Reports. 2011. December. Vol. 109. № 3. Pp. 983–989 // dx.doi.org/10.2466/07.09.20.PR0.109.6.983–989.

Wood W., Rünger D. Psychology of Habit // Annual Review of Psychology. 2016. January. Vol. 67. Pp. 289–314 // dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417.

Zhang S., Liu P., Feng T. To Do It Now or Later: The Cognitive Mechanisms and Neural Substrates Underlying Procrastination // WIREs Cognitive Science. 2019. July — August. Vol. 10. № 4 // dx.doi.org/10.1002/WCS.1492.

Allen A. P., Smith A. P. A Review of the Evidence That Chewing Gum Affects Stress, Alertness and Cognition // Journal of Behavioral and Neuroscience Research. 2011. Vol. 9. № 1. Pp. 7–23 // researchgate.net/publication/313065290_A_review_of_the_evidence_that_chewing_gum_affects_stress_alertness_and_cognition.

Altmann E. M., Trafton J. G., Hambrick D. Z. Momentary Interruptions Can Derail the Train of Thought // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2014. February. Vol. 143. № 1. Pp. 215–226 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030986.

Ariga A., Lleras A. Brief and Rare Mental ‘Breaks’ Keep You Focused: Deactivation and Reactivation of Task Goals Preempt Vigilance Decrements // Cognition. 2011. March. Vol. 118. № 3. Pp. 439–443 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.007.

Berridge K. C. Wanting and Liking: Observations from the Neuroscience and Psychology Laboratory // Inquiry. 2009. August. Vol. 52. № 4. Pp. 378–398 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/00201740903087359.

Bratman G. N., Hamilton J. P., Daily G. C. The Impacts of Nature Experience on Human Cognitive Function and Mental Health // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012. February. Vol. 1249. № 1. Pp. 118–136 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749–6632.2011.06400.x.

Duckworth A. L., Gross J. J. Behavior Change // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2020. November. Vol. 161 (suppl.). Pp. 39–49 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.09.002.

Duckworth A. L., Szabó Gendler T., Gross J. J. Situational Strategies for Self-Control // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2016. January. Vol. 11. № 1. Pp. 35–55 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247.

Junco R., Cotten S. R. The Relationship Between Multi-tasking and Academic Performance // Computers & Education. 2012. September. Vol. 59. № 2. Pp. 505–514 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023.

Onyper S. V., Carr T. L., Farrar J. S., Floyd B. R. Cognitive Advantages of Chewing Gum. Now You See Them, Now You Don’t // Appetite. 2011. October. Vol. 57. № 2. Pp. 321–328 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.05.313.

Orvell A., Vickers B. D., Drake B. et al. Does Distanced Self-Talk Facilitate Emotion Regulation Across a Range of Emotionally Intense Experiences? // Clinical Psychological Science. 2021. January. Vol. 9. № 1. Pp. 68–78 // dx.doi.org/10.1177/2167702620951539.

Rideout V., Robb M. B. The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens // San Francisco: Common Sense Media, 2019 // commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/2019-census-8-to-18-full-report-updated.pdf.

Risko E. F., Buchanan D., Medimorec S., Kingstone A. Everyday Attention: Mind Wandering and Computer Use during Lectures // Computers & Education. 2013. October. Vol. 68. Pp. 275–283 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.001.

Seli P., Risko E. F., Smilek D., Schacter D. L. Mind-Wandering with and Without Intention // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2016. August. Vol. 20. № 3. Pp. 605–617 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010.

Smallwood J., Schooler J. W. The Science of Mind Wandering: Empirically Navigating the Stream of Consciousness // Annual Review of Psychology. 2015. January. Vol. 66. Pp. 487–518 // dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331.

Stothart C., Mitchum A., Yehnert C. The Attentional Cost of Receiving a Cell Phone Notification // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2015. August. Vol. 41. № 4. Pp. 893–897 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000100.

Uncapher M. R., Wagner A. D. Minds and Brains of Media Multitaskers: Current Findings and Future Directions // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018. October. Vol. 115. № 40. Pp. 9889–9896 // dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611612115.

Willingham D. T. The High Price of Multitasking // New York Times, July 14, 2019 // nytimes.com/2019/07/14/opinion/multitasking-brain.html.

Zanesco A. P., King B. G., MacLean K. A. et al. Meditation Training Influences Mind Wandering and Mindless Reading // Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice. 2016. March. Vol. 3. № 1. Pp. 12–33 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/cns0000082.

Arens K. A., Marsh H. W., Pekrun R. et al. Math Self-Concept, Grades, and Achievement Test Scores: Long-Term Reciprocal Effects Across Five Waves and Three Achievement Tracks // Journal of Educational Psychology. 2017. July. Vol. 109. № 5. Pp. 621–634 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000163.

Brummelman E., Thomaes S. How Children Construct Views of Themselves: A Social-Developmental Perspective // Child Development. 2017. November — December. Vol. 88. № 6. Pp. 1763–1773 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12961.

Dedonno M. A. The Influence of Family Attributes on College Students’ Academic Self-Concept // North American Journal of Psychology. 2013. March. Vol. 15. № 1. Pp. 49–62 // researchgate.net/publication/235986598.

Koivuhovi S., Marsh H. W., Dicke T. et al. Academic Self-Concept Formation and Peer-Group Contagion: Development of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect in Primary-School Classrooms and Peer Groups // Journal of Educational Psychology. 2022. Vol. 114. № 1. Pp. 198–213 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000554.

Marsh H. W. Academic Self-Concept: Theory, Measurement, and Research // Psychological Perspectives on the Self. Vol. 4. The Self in Social Perspective, ed. by Jerry Suls. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press, 2016. Pp. 71–110.

Marsh H. W., Pekrun R., Murayama K. et al. An Integrated Model of Academic Self-Concept Development: Academic Self-Concept, Grades, Test Scores, and Tracking over 6 Years // Developmental Psychology. 2018. February. Vol. 54. № 2. Pp. 263–280 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000393.

Tan C. Y., Lyu M., Peng B. Academic Benefits from Parental Involvement Are Stratified by Parental Socioeconomic Status: A Meta-analysis // Parenting: Science and Practice. 2020. Vol. 20. № 4. Pp. 241–287 // dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2019.1694836.

Wolff F., Helm F., Zimmermann F., Nagy G., Möller J. On the Effects of Social, Temporal, and Dimensional Comparisons on Academic Self-Concept // Journal of Educational Psychology. 2018. October. Vol. 110. № 7. Pp. 1005–1025 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/EDU0000248.

Bernstein D. A., Teachman B. A., Olatunji B. O., Lilienfeld S. O. Cognitive, Behavioral, and Acceptance-Based Psychotherapies // Introduction to Clinical Psychology: Bridging Science and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Pp. 286–323.

Credé M., Kuncel N. R. Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes: The Third Pillar Supporting Collegiate Academic Performance // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008. November. Vol. 3. № 6. Pp. 425–453 // dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745–6924.2008.00089.x.

Duits P., Cath D. C., Lissek S. et al. Updated Meta-analysis of Classical Fear Conditioning in the Anxiety Disorders // Depression & Anxiety. 2015. April. Vol. 32. № 4. Pp. 239–253 // dx.doi.org/10.1002/DA.22353.

Eysenck M. W. Anxiety: The Cognitive Perspective. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.

Hirsch C. R., Mathews A. A Cognitive Model of Pathological Worry // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2012. October. Vol. 50. № 10. Pp. 636–646 // dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.06.007.

Hirsch C. R., Krahé C., Whyte J. et al. Interpretation Training to Target Repetitive Negative Thinking in Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Depression // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2018. December. Vol. 86. № 12. Pp. 1017–1030 // dx.doi.org/10.1037/CCP0000310.

Hoge E. A., Bui E., Marques L. et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness Meditation for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Effects on Anxiety and Stress Reactivity // Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2013. August. Vol. 74. № 8. Pp. 786–792 // dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.12M08083.

Stein M. B., Jang K. L., Livesley W. J. Heritability of Anxiety Sensitivity: A Twin Study // Journal of Psychiatry. 1999. February. Vol. 156. № 2. Pp. 246–251 // ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/ajp.156.2.246.