Airborne: A Guided Tour of an Airborne Task Force

To start our look at infantry equipment, it is appropriate to look at the gear that a soldier carries on his person. This can be a considerable load, and is only growing as time goes on. Such has always been the lot of the ground soldier in history, as the following example shows.

Soldiers in ancient Rome were not big men, but they routinely carried loads of sixty or eighty pounds on marches through the frozen forests of Germany or the hellish deserts of Syria. After the reforms of Marius in the 1st century BC, the Roman legionary (nicknamed “Marius’s Mule”) was the most formidable foot soldier on Earth, a position he held until the heavy cavalry of the Goths trampled the Emperor Valens and his legions at Adrianople in 378 AD. The legionary’s heavy load of personal equipment was a burden, but for centuries it made him unbeatable.

When today’s American paratrooper jumps into combat, he probably carries the heaviest average load of personal equipment of any warrior in history. Average loads of between 80 and 120 lb/36.3 and 54.4 kg are common during combat drops. Imagine carrying the equivalent of a bag of cement on your back as you try to march over a dozen miles into a combat zone! So let’s look at “the soldier’s load,” to get some idea of the challenge faced by today’s infantry.

Clothing/Body Armor

We’ll start our examination of soldiers’ personal gear with what they wear on their heads: the helmet. Back in ancient times, the Roman legionary’s head was protected by a bronze or iron helmet, often decorated with distinctive plumes or a horsehair crest so that officers could identify their own men in the confusion of battle. It provided a minimum of protection against the shock of being clubbed or chopped at, and would hardly do on the battlefields of today.

Today’s standard American “Fritz” or “K-Pot” helmet is made of Dupont Kevlar, a synthetic fiber material stronger and lighter than steel. It greatly resembles the helmets used by German forces throughout this century, and provides the best level of cranial protection available. There is an elaborate internal suspension system of straps and padding, and a replaceable fabric cover that provides for attaching camouflage to make the soldier more inconspicuous in battle. The K-Pot weighs about 31b/1.35 kg, and is secured by a chin strap. For the paratroops, this is tightly fastened before a jump. (This is one piece of gear you don’t want coming loose in a 130-knot slipstream!) Many armies have issued special paratroop helmets (designed with extra padding, or special compact shapes to reduce fraying or possible interference with parachute shroud lines), but the U.S. Army considers the standard infantry helmet, correctly worn, to be perfectly good for jumping.

There are two other items of headgear carried by paratroops. The soft cotton Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) hat is normally worn outdoors in non-combat situations. The other hat is the famous maroon airborne beret, made of wool felt and adorned with a regimental badge. This is typically worn on formal or ceremonial occasions, or in barracks. The floppy but dashing beret is the traditional hat of the Basque people, tough mountain folk who live in the Pyrenees between France and Spain, and was adopted long ago as a distinctive emblem by elite French Alpine troops. When the first British parachute regiment was established in 1940, it selected the maroon beret as its symbol (the Royal Tank Regiment already wore black berets). U.S. Army Airborne troops adopted the custom after World War II.

Moving down from the trooper’s head, we want now to examine the clothing worn into battle. At first in Roman times, the legionary’s legs were usually bare in all weather. But in the 5th century AD, the Romans adopted trousers from their barbarian foes and allies. Since that time, uniforms have evolved from a ceremonial decoration to a practical device for providing both protection against the elements and a bit of stealth for the infantry.

The modern U.S. BDU is the product of decades of research and engineering. There are three weights, depending on climate, and several camouflage color schemes: forest green, desert tan, and brown (the troops call them “chocolate chips”); white and gray for mountain/arctic conditions; and a dark, rarely seen night/urban pattern. The lightweight shirt and trousers are 100 percent cotton; the heavier weights are 50 percent cotton/50 percent synthetic fiber. BDUs are cut large for easy movement, so they look baggy. Airborne units, though, with their tradition of pride in looking sharp, manage to wear their BDUs with a little more style than most Army outfits as a result of tailoring and starching.

The BDU shirt, usually worn over a cotton undershirt of standard Army olive drab, has reinforced elbows, adjustable cuffs, and four button-down “bellows” pockets for ammunition, food, and other essentials. The trousers have two roomy side pockets, along with the usual front and back pockets. Adjustable waist tabs and drawstring ties at the ankles ensure a tight fit around the boot tops. In general, the BDUs are quite comfortable and wear well. In more temperate climates, troops carry the wonderful 4-1b/1.8-kg “field jacket,” a comfortable and versatile garment with an optional button-in liner and an attached hood that stows inside a clever zipped pouch.

Based largely in the muggy southern United States, with much of its recent operational experience in desert and jungle conditions, the U.S. Army has been slow to develop good cold-weather equipment. Back in the savage winters of the Korean War (1950-53), the Army’s outfits were inferior even when compared to the crude quilted jackets and fur hats worn by the Chinese Communist forces. Most cold weather injuries and fatalities are not due to frostbite, but rather to hypothermia (excessively low body core temperature) caused by loss of heat through wet garments. The new U.S. Extended Cold Weather Clothing System (ECWCS) finally reflects the lessons learned by the Army in Alaska, the U.S. Marines in Norway, and generations of research and development by civilian mountaineering and camping equipment suppliers. Much of the credit for the success of the new ECWCS clothing goes to a remarkable synthetic fabric called Gore-Tex. This lightweight material “breathes” through microscopic pores (9 billion per square in/1.4 billion per square cm), allowing body moisture to escape, but keeping warm air in and cold out. A layer of Gore-Tex is sandwiched between layers of nylon to make up a light but warm outer garment. The Inuit (“Eskimo”) peoples of the Arctic discovered this principle centuries ago, wearing their superbly crafted multi-layer fur garments with the fur on the inside to wick moisture away from the body. The ECWCS includes a hooded parka, gloves, and outer trousers. Gloves are a tough design challenge, since the soldier needs to be able to fire his weapon, operate a radio, and perform other precise tasks without losing any fingers to frostbite. The current standard cold-weather gloves are made of leather, in three sizes, with separate woolen liners.

To a soldier, any soldier, there is no more important piece of personal gear than boots. You can be stark naked, and still live to fight another day if you have boots to protect your feet as you walk to shelter. The legionary’s feet were shod with leather sandals, studded with iron hobnails for traction. Two thousand years later, there is still no more flexible and durable base material than leather for footwear. This means that most boots still have leather “uppers.” However, the modern rubber-soled jump boot does have a steel insert for protection against punji stakes and similar battlefield hazards.[22] The highly polished black jump boot is the revered symbol of the U.S. Airborne forces, even more than the beret or the winged parachute emblem. Any non-airborne-qualified soldier who appears in public wearing jump boots will be politely asked (once!) to remove them. The current jump boot is tall, providing strong and heavily padded ankle support. This is vital in helping heavily loaded paratroops avoid serious injuries during landings. Like a hockey skate, it is tightly bound with “speed laces,” secured by blackened brass fittings. A pair of jump boots weighs about 41b/1.8 kg, and several highly regarded manufacturers, including Danner and Corcoran, produce them.

It is a matter of some interest that the only really “new” piece of personal equipment that has been issued to the infantry in the last half century is body armor (the famous “flak jacket”). Back in the old days, our legionary’s torso was protected by thirty pounds or more of flexible armor, the lorica (originally made of chain mail, later from segmented steel plates fastened to a leather harness), which was worn over a padded linen or woolen tunic. Today’s flak jacket protects the same vital areas with less weight and greater effectiveness through a combination of advanced synthetic materials (mostly Kevlar) and metal/ceramic inserts.

As the name suggests, flak jackets were originally developed in World War II to protect bomber crews from antiaircraft shell fragments. An improved model was widely used by American troops in Vietnam, where it was credited with saving thousands of lives. The current protective vest weighs about 20 1b/9.1 kg, and is designed to stop a 7.62mm round at short range. The bullet may knock you down, or even crack a rib (it will definitely leave you severely bruised!), but you will be alive. Airborne troops do not normally jump wearing flak jackets — the weight is simply too great. The troops’ protective vests are dropped separately, and are normally worn on patrols or when close combat is expected. The greatest complaint about the current vest is that it is torture in hot weather, since it does not “breathe.” For these reasons, the Army is continuing research and development toward lighter, more breathable protective gear.

The design of effective body armor depends on a profound understanding of the gruesome science of “wound ballistics.” Unlike a tank, it is not practical to protect the soldier’s body with a thick mass of dense, rigid material. However, you can make a flexible (though binding vest) by building up dozens of layers of Kevlar fabric running in different directions, reinforced with overlapping metal or ceramic plates at key points. This spreads out the impact energy of a bullet or fragment over a wider area, preventing a potentially lethal penetration. Body armor is particularly valuable in peacekeeping and “operations other than war,” where the hazards are sim-ilarto those encounters by civilian law enforcement. Just ask any city cop if he thinks protective vests are for sissies!

Chemical Protective Gear

Since the first use of chlorine gas as a crude chemical weapon on the Western Front in 1916, armies have struggled to provide soldiers with effective protection from increasingly horrible chemical and biological threats. The two recent Persian Gulf Wars have proven to everyone that the threat of chemical and biological weapons is still very real, and the 82nd Airborne troopers have to be ready for it. To survive, let alone fight, in an environment that may be contaminated with persistent nerve gas, lethal aerosol viruses, or radioactive fallout is a formidable challenge. The goal is to completely surround the soldier with a portable, flexible barrier through which only sound, light, and filtered air can pass. The long-term problems of eating and eliminating bodily waste make this virtually impossible, so the practical objective is to survive long enough to complete a mission and reach a safe area where troops who have been “slimed” (exposed to chemical agents) can decontaminate themselves and their equipment. This problem has been reduced slightly, since U.S. tactical vehicles and many items of equipment are painted with a costly Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (known as “CARC” paint) that does not absorb toxic agents, and stands up to the harsh chemicals needed to decontaminate surfaces.[23]

The basic piece of nuclear/biological/chemical (NBC) protective gear is the M40 protective mask carried by every U.S. infantryman. The M40 is a silicone rubber mask that fits tightly against the face. Large binocular goggles provide good peripheral vision and can be covered with removable tinted inserts. A flexible “voice emitter” covers the mouth area (this allows the use of voice communications gear), and there is a drinking tube designed for a special canteen adapter. A replaceable filter canister screws into the left or right side, usually the opposite side from where the soldier would hold his personal weapon to aim it. The filter canisters contain layers of elements that trap the most microscopic airborne particles and droplets. This includes activated charcoal (this absorbs many toxins), treated paper and fabrics, and other components that the Army would probably rather not discuss.

Along with the mask, a rubberized fabric hood covers the soldier’s head and neck — the normal “Fritz” helmet is worn over the hood and mask. In a riot-control scenario, with simple tear (CS) gas or other irritants in use, the mask could be worn by itself, but troops expecting a significant NBC threat would normally supplement the protective mask with a complete disposable outer garment of rubberized fabric. Called a “MOPP suit” (for Mission-Oriented Protective Posture), it has a charcoal-lined inner layer, and includes over-boots and thick rubber gloves. The full MOPP ensemble is heavy and hot, but does provide a good degree of protection. Part of the MOPP outfit is a strip of chemical indicator paper wrapped around the upper arm. This strip is supposed to turn red in the presence of dangerous concentrations of nerve or blood agents. Combat units have a limited number of battery-operated hand-held Chemical Agent Monitors (CAM) used to determine the effectiveness of decontamination and the limits of a contaminated area.

Reliable detection and warning of attack by biological agents and toxins remains an urgent research priority. During Desert Storm, every American soldier and Marine who went over the berm into Iraq and Kuwait wore MOPP suits, albeit with the hoods and masks off (though nearby and ready for use). Luckily, it was actually cold and rainy during the February 1991 ground war, and most troops actually stayed warm by keeping the suits on throughout the entire “Hundred-Hour War.” However, normal summer desert conditions would probably limit wearing of the full MOPP ensemble to just a few hours at most. Clearly, more work is still needed to make the American soldier proof against the variety of NBC threats.

Personal Stowage

Besides the clothes on his back, the soldier must carry all the essentials of military life around with him. Even the Romans had the problem of carrying their “stuff.” On long marches, the legionary often carried his food (usually bread, cheese, smoked meat, and onions), clothes, and other possessions wrapped in a bundle and tied on the end of a stick, much like the fabled “hobo rig.” Today’s airborne troopers have a somewhat more difficult set of stowage and carrying problems to deal with. They must jump heavily loaded into a 130-kt/241-kph slipstream from an aircraft with everything they will need. Then, once on firm ground, they must live and fight with just what they are carrying for up to three days of operations. This is an impressive luggage design problem, one that has challenged engineers for several millennia.

The modern equivalent of the Roman stick and bag is the “rucksack,” a large backpack originally made of canvas. Current models are now composed of synthetic fabric over an aluminum frame, with a suspension system of padded webbing straps designed to support heavy loads in reasonable comfort. The official acronym for this system is “ALICE,” which stands for All-purpose, Lightweight Individual Carrying Equipment. Obviously, the paratrooper cannot wear a backpack over his main parachute, so for jumping, the rucksack is strapped dangling between the jumper’s legs, secured on a length of webbing that is released just before landing to reduce the force of impact. This rather awkward arrangement requires a “chalk” of paratroopers to waddle or shuffle out to the aircraft when boarding, rather than marching.

One of the important lessons that every airborne trooper has drilled into his head early in training is the necessity of getting his weapons ready for action as soon as he hits the ground. Even before he gets out of his parachute harness, the trooper is expected to have his personal weapon locked and loaded in case a fight develops on the drop zone. Consequently, it would not do for the paratrooper to have to go fumbling through a tightly packed rucksack for a weapon and ammunition. German paratroops of World War II, using a one-point suspension harness that left their hands free, could theoretically fire their submachine gun as they descended. This rarely happened in practice. The Fallschirmjager’s individual weapons were packed in a container that was separately parachuted from the aircraft, and many troopers were killed as they struggled to retrieve and unpack their weapons. Also, the design of modern parachutes, which hold the jumper rigidly upright, along with elementary safety concerns in massed jumps, makes firing in the air impractical.

To accommodate the dual requirements of safely delivering a weapon and making it easy to get into action, the U.S. airborne community has developed a series of weapons-carrying cases. These resemble oversized padded gun cases for wrapping and packaging individual weapons to ensure they remain attached to their soldier (always on the left side) and arrive on the ground ready to shoot. Every man-portable weapon carried into battle by the airborne has at least one such case. In the event that a heavy weapon like the 60mm mortar or Javelin antitank missile system is too large to be carried in one case, it is broken into separate loads which each go into their own specially designed case. The biggest of these is the case for the Stinger man-portable surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, which is so long that you have to be at least 5’ 8”/1.73 meters tall to use it safely. In addition to its designed load, each heavy weapons case can carry a personal weapon, like the lightweight M4 version of the M16A2 combat rifle. Once on the ground, the paratrooper rapidly assembles his personal weapon, loading it with a magazine stashed in a pocket in the carrying case. Then, grabbing up his rucksack, personal weapon, and heavy weapons load (if any), he is ready to go.

Or is he? As we mentioned earlier, the last thing that a paratrooper running into a sudden firefight wants to have to do is go rummaging around, frequently in the dark, into his rucksack for a fresh ammunition magazine or grenade. Therefore, certain essential items of gear are moved out to a special harness mounting on the outside of the BDUs. Called web gear or load-bearing equipment, this is a belt with a suspenders-style set of padded straps. Using special metal clips, you can attach a variety of different bags, pouches, and other containers to the belt and straps. These include canteen pouches (usually two are carried on the belt), ammunition pouches (these hold three loaded thirty-round M16A2 5.56mm magazines and a pair of M49-series grenades), flashlights, and even holders for cellular phones. The idea is that in the event of a sudden close-combat action, the troopers would drop their heavy rucksacks and fight “light,” with the equipment on their web gear. In this way, their mobility under fire is maximized until such time as the situation has been resolved, the paratroopers can retrieve their packs, and move on to their next objective.

Personal Weapons/Tools

The reason that you drop paratroops onto a target is to take it, usually by some sort of potentially lethal force. More often than not, that force will be based upon the personal weapons of those same troopers. The Roman legionary’s only weapons were a short, straight-edged sword (with a blade 18 inches/.46 meters long) and a couple of javelins. By comparison, today’s airborne soldier carries an amazing array of personal firepower and tools. While some people might admire the elegant simplicity of the legionary’s weapons, you have to remember that modern infantrymen face an array of enemies and targets unlike anything imagined two thousand years ago. While the legionnaire might have had to face another pikeman or mounted soldier, today’s soldier might be asked to destroy a tank or bunker, or shoot down an airplane or helicopter. This is an enormous group of tasks, and obviously requires a versatile array of tools to accomplish. Fortunately, the U.S. Army has done an above-average job of equipping him for the task.[24] M16A2 Rifle. Historically, airborne troops have often been armed with submachine guns (like the British Sten, or the German MP38, misnamed “Schmeisser” by GIs), or short-barreled folding-stock versions (“carbines”) of standard infantry rifles. These are not only lighter, but easier to manage in the cramped confines of a troop carrier aircraft. The U.S. Army, however, equips its airborne infantry with the standard M16A2, preferring the benefits of standardized training, logistic support, and superior accuracy from a longer-barreled weapon. This is the story of that weapon.

Americans love rifles. Without the firepower and lethality of the famous “Kentucky” rifle (developed by German and Swiss gunsmiths in Pennsylvania), there would be no America. The Indians would have wiped out the struggling colonies in Massachusetts and Virginia in the 17th century, or the English would have defeated them in the American War of Independence. The intimate connection between the American rifle and American history makes military firearms a volatile and controversial topic, and no rifle in history has caused more passionate controversy than the M16. When it was first issued to U.S. troops in Vietnam in 1966, it gained a reputation for jamming. Soldiers whispered rumors about a Marine platoon overrun by the Viet Cong in which every dead rifleman was found with a cleaning rod in hand, desperately trying to clear a stuck cartridge case. (The Marine Corps Historian told me that there is no evidence that this ever happened!)

The problems stemmed largely from the Army’s use of low-grade propellant in the ammunition, against the advice of the manufacturer. The inferior powder caused excessive fouling and corrosion. This would not have been so bad except that due to a shortage of cleaning kits and lubricant, troops thought that the M16 was a “self-cleaning weapon.” Unlike the indestructible bolt-action rifles of World War II that the veteran sergeants had handled all their lives, a gas-operated automatic like the M16 is a precision machine that requires meticulous and thorough cleaning after firing to ensure continued reliable operation. When proper cleaning kits were provided, and troops were trained to maintain the weapon, the M16 proved to be absolutely reliable. To improve the weapon even further, the chamber was chrome-plated to resist corrosion, and a sturdy manual bolt closing lever was added, to force home any cartridge that became stuck (this is typically caused by a dented cartridge case, which never should have been loaded in the magazine in the first place).

For over two decades, the basic M16 (as well as the improved M16A1) served in the armed forces of the U.S. and many of our allies. However, by the 1980s, a new version was needed, and this became the second-generation M16A2. Manufactured by Colt in Hartford, Connecticut, the M16A2 is an air-cooled, gas-operated, magazine-fed assault rifle firing a 5.56mm (.223-caliber) bullet to a maximum effective range of about 600 yards/550 meters. The weapon weighs 8.9 lb/4.05 kg loaded with a thirty-round magazine. A selector switch toggles between safe, single shots, or three-round bursts. The full-automatic (“rock and roll”) mode of earlier M16 models, which could empty an entire clip in a few seconds of wild inaccurate spraying, has been eliminated. Airborne troopers are trained to extend their ammunition even further by limiting themselves whenever possible to single, aimed shots. Another key improvement to the M16A2 was the muzzle compensator, an ingenious gas deflector that counteracts the muzzle’s natural tendency to climb during a burst. The weapon can also be quickly adapted for left-handed shooters (about 15 percent of troops) by switching the side to which spent cartridge cases are ejected. Generally, the M16A2 is an excellent combat rifle, and is among the best of its class today.

Beretta M9 Personal Defense Weapon. An incredibly small percentage of combat casualties are inflicted by handguns. Under the stress of combat, even the best-trained pistol shooters are unlikely to score first-round hits on an alerted opponent at ranges beyond five yards/meters! Normally, military combat pistols are only issued to officers, military police, aviators, and soldiers whose duties prevent them from using a rifle effectively but who still require a lethal close-combat weapon. For the U.S. armed forces, that weapon is the M9 Beretta Model 92F 9mm handgun. The choice of a “foreign” weapon to replace the classic Colt M1911.45-caliber automatic was bitterly controversial in 1985, but M9s for the U.S. Department of Defense are actually assembled in Accokeek, Maryland.

The Beretta’s basic design dates from the 1930s, though it packs a number of modern safety and firing features. Advantages of this 9mm weapon are its large fifteen-round magazine (compared to just seven in the M1911A1 Colt and only six in the Smith & Wesson.38-caliber revolver), light weight (1.15 kg/2.61b with a full magazine), and superior controllability, especially for troops with small hands. The barrel is 125mm/almost 5 in long, giving a nominal effective range of around 50 meters/55 yards. Realistically, though, most shooters are trained to work out to about 25 meters/27.5 yards.

Overall, the M9 is an excellent weapon, albeit one with more in the way of safety features than I personally prefer. The weapon is normally issued with a cleaning kit, and there are a variety of holster designs, depending on the soldier’s uniform. Normally, the M9 would be carried, along with several spare loaded magazines, on the trooper’s web belt.

M203 Grenade Launcher. The practical limit for throwing a hand grenade is about 30 meters/33 yards, and the accurate limit is considerably less. During World War I, various armies experimented with “rifle grenades” that used special cartridges or muzzle adapters to launch an impact-fused explosive grenade from a standard infantry rifle. When properly employed, they were effective out to a range of 100 meters/110 yards or more. The rifle grenade was particularly useful in street fighting, where a skilled grenadier could put an explosive round over a wall or through a window. The U.S. Army never took much interest in rifle grenades, preferring the greater firepower of light mortars operated by specialist crews. In Vietnam, however, a short-barreled 40mm grenade launcher, the M79 “thump gun,” proved its worth, becoming a standard squad weapon. The only drawback was that the grenadier had to carry the additional weight of his own M16 rifle, switching weapons according to the tactical situation.

The M203 is a clever compromise, fitting a stubby pump-action 40mm grenade launcher under the barrel of a standard M16A2. One man in every four-man fire team is equipped with an M203. The grenade launcher adds only 3 1b/1.36 kg to the weight of the weapon. It consists of a hand guard and sight assembly with an adjustable sight, and an aluminum receiver which houses the barrel latch, barrel stop, and firing mechanism. The launcher fires a variety of low-velocity 40mm ammunition. These include high-explosive fragmentation, smoke, tear gas, and illumination rounds. Illumination grenades, which are fired at a high angle to deploy a dazzling magnesium flare on a miniature parachute, are particularly useful to the 82nd Airborne, which prefers to fight at night. Each illumination round is good for about a minute of fairly bright visibility. “Non-lethal” plastic and foam-rubber “beanbag” rounds have also been developed for riot control and peacekeeping. The launcher also has a quadrant sight which may be attached to the M16A2 carrying handle and used when precision is required at longer ranges. Maximum effective range against an area target is 1,150 feet/350 meters. Against a point target the practical range is about 490 feet/150 meters. The minimum safe range for combat is 100 feet/31 meters. This is an important weapon for the fire team, providing a base of heavy fire at the very head of an infantry assault.

M249 Squad Automatic Weapon. Late in World War I the German Army realized that the light machine gun, carried and operated by one man, was a key ingredient to a new, aggressive approach to small-unit tactics. The new tactics were based upon the seamless integration of infantry firepower and maneuver. This tactical doctrine was later refined and perfected in World War II, and the light machine gun that made it possible found its ultimate expression in the MG-42. This light machine gun was so good that the U.S. Army adopted it, with minor “improvements,” as the 7.62mm M60. The powerful 7.62mm round was also fired by the M14 rifle. Unfortunately, with the introduction of the M16 (which fired a 5.56mm round), the M14 was rendered obsolete.[25] This left the Army without a “rifle caliber” combat rifle, and now required the carrying of two separate sizes of ammunition (5.56mm and 7.62mm) by U.S. rifle units. This was hardly a desirable situation, and efforts were begun to find a light machine gun that could use the same 5.56mm ammunition as the M16.

After many years of trials and experiments, the Army adopted a design called the FN Minimi, developed by the famed Belgian arsenal Fabrique National, as the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW). This gas-operated weapon weighs 16.31b/7.4 kg, measures 41 in/103 cm in length, and has an effective range of 800 meters/875 yards. The rate of fire is an awesome seven hundred to one thousand rounds per minute, but SAW gunners are trained to fire short bursts to conserve ammunition. The M249 is normally fired from a prone position, supported by folding bipod legs and the soldier’s shoulder. The SAW uses a two-hundred-round plastic box magazine (it weighs 6.91b/3.1 kg) for its disintegrating-link-belted ammunition, but can also accept standard thirty-round M16 magazines from the lower receiver. A hinged plate covers the belt-feeder when a magazine is inserted, or covers the magazine opening when the belt is loaded. The M249 is among the best light machine guns ever produced, and has proven popular among rifle units. In particular, they like having all the personal weapons in a fire team firing the same 5.56mm ball ammunition. Tested many times in combat, the SAW has always performed well.

Cutlery, Ammunition, Mines, and Grenades. Important as firearms are to a paratrooper, he would never go into action without an impressive collection of cutlery. The government-issued knives include a bayonet for the M16 rifle and a rigger’s knife. This last is a spring-loaded folding blade designed to cut away the shroud lines of a parachute in an emergency, such as a tree landing. In addition, a survival/combat knife is often worn in a scabbard strapped to one leg. Then there is the matter of personal knives and tools. While most paratroops still pack the traditional Swiss Army knife, something else is taking the place of other tools that might be needed in airborne operation. Rather than lugging around a box full of tools, most infantrymen are today carrying “multi-tools.” These are folding pliers that contain a number of other different and useful tools (screwdrivers, wire cutters, etc.). Various models made by Gerber and Leatherman are favored, and actually quite useful. Today’s airborne soldier also carries a folding entrenching tool with a sharpened blade that doubles as a nasty weapon in hand-to-hand combat. An improved Fighting Position Excavator (IPV-government for “shovel”) is under development. While all of this may seem excessive, try telling that to a young paratrooper jumping into a dark night, knowing nothing of what may be out there. Remember, these knives and tools may mean the difference between mission failure and success for an airborne trooper.

Along with all the cutlery, a paratrooper typically jumps with six M16 5.56mm ammunition magazines (loaded with thirty rounds each) and four M49 grenades (a mix of explosive-fragmentation, flash-bang, and smoke, depending on the mission). These are carried in a pair of pouches attached to the web gear. In addition, each trooper in a fire team not equipped with an M203 will usually carry an extra two-hundred-round M249 SAW magazine. If necessary, the SAW magazine can be broken down to reload empty M16 clips. For the M203-equipped trooper, there will likely be a stock of various types of 40mm grenades, depending upon the mission, threat level, and rules of engagement. Also towed away in the rucksack may be a claymore or other antipersonnel mine or a few rounds of 60mm mortar ammunition for the company’s heavy weapons platoon. Usually, the mortar rounds are dropped off in an assembly area, prior to the paratroops starting off to their objectives. All told, a U.S. paratrooper is probably carrying over 40 1b/18.1 kg of ammunition and weapons. It is a heavy load, but one that must be borne if the mission of the airborne is to be accomplished.

Sensors and Communications Gear. If there is any single area of military science that the United States leads the world in, it must be the use of advanced electronics to overcome night darkness and the general “fog of war.” The electronics revolution has even reached down to touch the individual paratrooper, as you will shortly see.

Two thousand years ago, our Roman legionary was lucky to see at night by the light of a few smoky torches around the perimeter of his camp, or by a tiny clay lamp inside his tent fueled by some of his precious olive oil ration. Today, every paratrooper carries a couple of personal flashlights (usually one in a pouch on his web gear and a spare in his rucksack). These are miniature “Maglites,” the same kind you can buy from any camping-supply mail-order catalog. In the field, though, they must be capped by a pack of red and yellow filter inserts. Red light is not normally visible to the enemy at long range, and it does not impair troops’normal night vision. Besides, if you show a white light at night around airborne troopers, you are likely to get shot — by them! However, today’s infantryman has a lot more than just a flashlight to see his way on the night battlefield.

Every four-man fire team will normally have one or two sets of Night Vision Goggles (NVGs). Optical devices of this type are sometimes called “starlight scopes.” Originally developed during World War II, starlight scopes for many years were “black” weapons, shrouded in secrecy and issued mainly to snipers and covert intelligence agents. During the Vietnam War first-generation scopes were mass-produced and widely issued to U.S. soldiers. The scope uses reflected moonlight or starlight at night and can amplify dim images up to fifty thousand times. Civilian hunters can now buy excellent night-vision goggles of this general type (made in Russia, no less!) for less than $800.

The most common U.S. model of NVG is the AN/PVS-7B, which is based on a third-generation image-intensifier tube, which amplifies even the smallest amount of available light from stars or moonlight. The AN/PVS- 7B represents the 1996 state of the art in NVGs, and is a significant improvement over earlier systems. The single-tube image intensifier uses prisms and lenses to provide the user with simulated binocular vision with no magnification. Through the dual displays (the NVGs are mounted either on a “Fritz” helmet or head harness) you see a greenish, monochromatic view of the world without peripheral vision, so you have to scan continuously, left to right, up and down. It takes training and practice to move, search, and engage targets wearing NVGs, but the trouble they cause is worth the effort. A fast-acting “blooming” protection circuit prevents the user from being dazzled if a flare, vehicle headlights, or other bright light appears in the 40° circular field of view. In starlight (with no moon) a man-sized target can be spotted at around 100 meters/109.4 yards. In full moonlight that same man-sized target can be spotted at over 300 meters/328 yards, and vehicles out to 500 meters/547 yards. The AN/PVS-7B operates for up to twelve hours on a single battery, and weighs only 24 oz/.68 kg. Unit cost is about $6,000, and production is dual-sourced by ITT and Litton. Once a soldier is equipped with NVGs, there are other pieces of gear that can help him do his job.

Fitted to his weapon, the soldier may carry an AN/PAQ-4C Infrared Aiming Light, nicknamed the “death dot.” This is a lightweight (9 oz/.255 kg), low-cost, Helium-Neon infrared laser which is invisible to the naked eye. However, the infrared “death dot” shows up beautifully when wearing NVGs. Once the beam is boresighted to the weapon for a “point of aim/point of impact,” the firer simply places the pulsating spot on the target and shoots. This aiming light has been adapted for use with the M16 rifle, and can be fitted to the M60 machine gun, M2 heavy machine gun, or M249 SAW. Team leaders can also use the laser spot to designate targets or movement directions for their soldiers out to a maximum of 200 to 300 meters /219 to 328 yards, depending on the level of ambient light.

One other small but vital piece of night-vision equipment is the “chemlight.” This is a liquid-filled plastic stick that glows for up to twelve hours when crushed. They are used at night for silent signaling and marking positions. Chem-lights come in various colors (green, yellow, red, white, etc.), including one type that glows only in the infrared spectrum, visible only to night-vision devices such as NVGs and thermal sensors. All of these devices make American infantry the most capable night fighters in the world today. Because of advanced technology and a little Yankee ingenuity, our troops truly “own the night” on the battlefield.

Another area where advanced electronics are serving the paratrooper is communications. This represents a vast improvement over ancient times. Back in Roman days, every legion had a unit of trumpeters who stood by the commanding general to signal his orders down to the cohorts and maniples by blowing pre-established calls. Given the noise of battle, though, these were probably limited to “advance, withdraw, flank left, and flank right.” If a centurion in a tight spot needed to urgently request reinforcements, the only way to do it was to send a runner. Even better, two runners with the same message, by different paths, in case one took a javelin in the back. By the time of the American Civil War(1861 to 1865) the electric telegraph was beginning to influence events on the battlefield, but the technology of small-unit tactical communications did not change much until the U.S. Army introduced the handheld, battery operated “walkie-talkie” during World War II. Its range might have been only a few hundred yards/meters, but it was enough to allow a platoon leader to talk to his company commander, who himself had a radioman lugging a forty-pound transmitter-receiver set to pass the word up to the battalion headquarters. Strangely, today is little different from five decades ago.

Now, you might wonder why, in an age where every city cop has a two-pound “brick” radio on his belt (and every drug dealer has an even smaller cellular phone or pager in his pocket), every soldier doesn’t get a personal communications device. The answer is explained in just one word: security. Anything that transmits in the radio frequency spectrum can be located by an enemy. Even more dangerous is the fact that anything that can be located can be targeted and killed.

Modern tactical radios such as the U.S. Army’s “Single Channel Ground-Air Radio System” (SINCGARS)[26] stay one jump ahead of this grim fact by complex techniques of “frequency hopping” and “spread spectrum” transmission. Since voice and data transmissions have to be “scrambled” or “encrypted,” there is an additional layer of administrative complexity for controlling and distributing the code keys. Even if the con-tentof the message is scrambled by encryption, the enemy can still extract useful information by analyzing the radio traffic pattern. Since we know this, our Signal units deploy special teams to generate bogus traffic, to confuse enemy analysts, and their Signal guys do the same thing, and so on. If this is giving you a headache, you’re beginning to understand the fundamentals of tactical communication. Since there are only a few usable tactical frequency bands, and a lot of people on both sides trying to talk at once, armies have developed rather rigid communications doctrines. This prevents mutual interference with detailed rules governing who can transmit what, where, when, and how.

For our paratroops, the smallest of the Army’s current SINCGARS tactical radios is the backpack-sized AN/PRC-119, which weighs 221b/10 kg. The -119 is an FM transceiver (i.e., the same unit can transmit and receive, but not simultaneously) operating in the VHF band (between 30 and 88 MHz), hopping among 2320 different frequencies! Five watts of radiated power give the unit a range of 2.5 to 5 mi/4 to 8 km, depending on terrain, weather, and other conditions. This is still a terribly heavy load for a soldier to carry, and additional work is going on to reduce the size of the SINCGARS units. Racal, Inc., has developed a SINCGARS radio (the PRC 6745 “Leprechaun”) that weighs only 3 1b/1.35 kg. Described as “ruggedized and immersible,” it sounds like a paratrooper’s dream. Radiated output is selectable from.5 to 5 watts, to conserve power and adjust the range. It has a jack that can connect to a satellite Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, so that when you hit the PTT (“press-to-talk”) button, it automatically transmits your location over the radio net. You can plug the Leprechaun into your laptop computer, or power it from a vehicle adapter. When the Army finally buys such SINCGARS units, you can bet that the 82nd Airborne’s Signal Battalion will be next in line, right after the Special Forces guys get theirs.

There is one other type of sensor which commonly provides data to the paratroops: navigational instruments. These days, this means a miniature NAVISTAR GPS receiver. Today, at least one man in every infantry squad will have a Small Lightweight GPS Receiver (SLGR — called a “slugger” by the troops; it is produced by Trimble Navigation) or the newer AN/PSN-11 Portable Lightweight GPS Receiver (PLGR or “plugger,” which is built by Rockwell Collins) carefully stowed in his rucksack. The PLGR is a hand-held device about the size of a brick, weighing less than 3 1b/1.5 kg. It is a five-channel GPS receiver capable of Precision Code (“P” Code) and “Y” Code (encrypted P Code) reception. These tiny devices represent a truly revolutionary innovation. Knowing exactly where you are and where you want to go is a significant development in warfare, and in the human condition in general. This still does not guarantee that soldiers will not get lost. Troops will still have to develop their navigational skills to effectively use GPS as a field tool. However, as long as the supply of fresh batteries holds out, no American unit will ever have an excuse to be lost on the battlefield again. This is particularly critical in airborne assaults, where units may be scattered over a wide area.

The PLGR and SLGR receive data from a constellation of twenty-four GPS satellites and display your exact three-dimensional location in military coordinates, or latitude and longitude, anywhere on earth. How “exact” is considered sensitive information, but published sources indicate that the encoded “PY” signal is accurate within 3 meters/10 feet. As an added bonus, PLGR also displays the time, accurate within microseconds. During Desert Storm the GPS signal was particularly hard to jam, and it will be many years before any likely opponent deploys an anti-GPS satellite weapon. One feature of the GPS system, called “selective availability,” can be activated in wartime or during a crisis by Air Force ground controllers to degrade the accuracy of the GPS signal for all users who do not have a military GPS receiver. Unless the receiver is primed with the proper daily “Y code” key, the receiver will not generate accurate positional data. However, the National Command Authorities have never seen fit to activate “selective availability,” and hopefully never will. GPS has become too valuable a public service (some think of it as a new kind of public utility) for any sort of extended disruption to be tolerated for long. Civilian applications are growing exponentially in number every year, and GPS will soon be the air navigational system for the world in just a few years. You can even buy a GPS receiver for yourself. Today, sophisticated miniaturized GPS receivers like the Trimble Scout can be mail-ordered for about $500.

Last but not least, there are a couple of other items commonly used by paratroops to navigate their way around the battlefield. Even in the age of satellite navigation systems, a combat soldier still needs a map and compass. For one thing, GPS receivers don’t work well in built-up areas, or in deep ravines where you cannot see a wide expanse of sky. The standard-issue Army magnetic compass weighs 5 oz/.14 kg, and comes in a nylon case that clips to your web gear. The pointer glows in complete darkness, thanks to a tiny amount of radioactive tritium. Many troopers prefer a commercial magnetic compass (like the fluid-filled models made by Silva) with more features that assist in map reading. This matter of maps is worth a short discussion as well.

Today, American soldiers are privileged to have a vast avalanche of mapping and photographic data available for their use. Under the newly formed (as of October 1st, 1996) National Imaging and Mapping Agency (NIMA), maps of every scale and detail level are being produced for use in the field. Drawn directly from satellite photos, these maps provide the ground soldier with an unparalleled level of situational awareness. Today, when the 82nd Airborne Division deploys overseas, it takes along literally tons of such documents for use by troopers down to the fire-team level. Down at the trooper level, there is an almost artistic skill to cutting the maps and pasting them into small, easily stowed packages for use in the field. Folding plastic map cases are seen in abundance, and map skills are essential for any sort of understanding of events on the modern battlefield. Luckily, the United States has done an admirable job of supplying its soldiers with the finest such maps and navigational tools in the history of warfare.

Food and Water. It is an obvious fact that safe supplies of food and water are vital to any sort of military operation in the field. Back in the 18th century, Napoleon was credited with the statement that “an army marches on its stomach,” and he was right. Today, any force that a nation can field will fold up in a matter of days without food, and just hours without fresh water.

With this in mind, the U.S. Army has come a long way from the “C” and “K” rations of the Second World War. Today, the Army’s standard field/combat rations are called MREs (Meals, Ready to Eat). An MRE is a collection of wet, dry, and freeze-dried food packs, along with eating utensils, condiments, and paper napkins, sealed in an almost indestructible brown plastic pouch. There are twelve different basic MRE menus, one of each packed together in a carton, without much distinction between breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Each MRE weighs about 21b/1kg, contains about three thousand calories (each soldier is allocated four MREs per day), and is nutritionally complete. In fact, if you consume everything in the MREs, which troops rarely do, you will actually gain weight, even with strenuous exercise. MREs have excellent shelf life under even the worst of conditions, but the basic diet is still somewhat bland.

The following listings of MRE contents should give you some idea of what they are like:

• Menu #2: Corned beef hash, freeze-dried pears, crackers, apple jelly, oatmeal cookie bar, powdered fruit drink, powdered cocoa, a plastic spoon, and Accessory Package “C” (freeze-dried coffee, non-dairy creamer, sugar, salt, pepper, chewing gum, hand cleaner, and toilet tissue).

• Menu #4: Omelet with ham, potatoes au gratin, crackers, cheese spread, oatmeal cookie bar, powdered fruit drink, spoon, and Accessory Package “C.”

• Menu #7: Beef stew, crackers, peanut butter, cherry nut cake, a miniature bottle of Tabasco sauce (these are particularly coveted by the troops), spoon, and Accessory Package “A” (coffee, creamer, sugar, salt, pepper, chewing gum, matches, hand cleaner, and toilet tissue).

• Menu #11: A favorite of mine, this is chicken and rice, crackers, cheese spread, chocolate-covered cookie bar, powdered fruit drink, Starburst candy, spoon, and Accessory Package “A.”

MREs are relatively messy to eat. (A hint: Use your Swiss Army knife or multi-tool to slit the wet-pack bags the long way to reduce the mess.) All the packaging material produces a lot of wet garbage, which is not just an environmental nuisance. It forces paratroops behind enemy lines to carry their trash with them, or risk revealing their path and numbers.

Along with the basic dozen MRE menus, there are other pre-packaged rations in Army issue today. Since World War II, the Army has tried to supply soldiers of the Jewish faith with approved kosher meals. There also is an increasing requirement to accommodate the religious dietary beliefs of Muslims and strict vegetarians such as Hindus and Buddhists. In late 1993, a new series of ready-to-eat vegetarian MREs based on lentils, rice, beans, and potatoes were produced and issued. Amazingly, they proved highly popular with mainstream soldiers, many of whom found the new rations more tasty and health-conscious than the regular menus. Later, with the coming of widespread relief operations like those in Iraq and Bosnia, the vegetarian MREs found a new and politically useful role. Sealed into bright yellow pouches and airdropped as emergency humanitarian relief rations to refugees, these “politically correct” MREs have proven extremely popular, and politically beneficial. Distributing plenty of such humanitarian rations to civilians caught in the combat zone is a good way to win friends and influence people. The Defense Personnel Support Center, Directorate of Subsistence, in Philadelphia, proudly claims that it can procure humanitarian rations that are “culturally, ethnically, regionally, nutritionally, and religiously acceptable” for any scenario.

The Army’s next generation of combat chow is called the Family of Operational Rations (FOR), designed to overcome some of the problems of MREs. For field operations, the emphasis is on reduced packaging and weight, with ready-to-eat entrees that can be held in the hand and eaten on the move, like sandwiches or burritos. For a generation raised on a diet of pizza, burritos, and hamburgers, this is far more acceptable than stuff you have to spoon out of a bag. Another ration issue is the matter of troops in barracks. Combat troops deployed to distant contingencies spend much of their time in camp or garrison situations, so the new FOR includes self-heating group meals, packaged with disposable plates and utensils. This has been found to be a great morale booster, certainly compared to spooning stuff out of a plastic bag. Unfortunately, the Army has revealed no plans to develop an air-droppable, laser-guided, self-chilling keg of beer!

The other vital area of sustenance is fresh water. As mentioned earlier, personnel exposed to the extreme heat of your average desert in the summer will last just hours if they are not properly resupplied with fluids. To this end, each trooper will carry about 6 quarts/5.7 liters in two canteens, and a pair of flexible bladders in his rucksack. In temperate climates, this is enough for up to three days. In higher heat, though, it may only last a few hours. To augment these limited supplies, many troops are buying their own personal water carriage systems. Called “Camelbacks,” these are flexible bladders that ride between the troopers’ backs and their ALICE rigs. A hose feeds the water to the soldiers, so that they can take a drink whenever possible. Beyond what a single man can carry, the 82nd Airborne Division is set up to receive bulk water supplies via airdrop, as well as creating its own fresh water when reverse-osmosis equipment can be air-delivered into the combat zone. As an interim measure, troopers are frequently supplied with purification chemical tablets to make local water sources potable.

Putting all of this together means that, in theory, an airborne trooper should carry enough food and water to last three days in the field without resupply. In a pleasant climate, this would mean carrying the aforementioned 6 quarts/5.7 liters of water and a dozen MREs: a total weight of over 361b/16.4 kg! Along with the basic weapons/tool/ammunition/clothing/electronics load, which is already over 50 lb/22.7 kg, this means that a paratrooper’s basic load (before any personal gear) is rapidly approaching 100 lb/45.4 kg. As a result, many soldiers cut the load of MREs in half in the hope of an early resupply. Also, they load up on all the water that they can possibly carry, since they will die of dehydration long before the effects of starvation can take effect. All of this affects the final items that will be going into the soldier’s basic load, his personal equipment.

Personal Equipment

Back in the Roman days, an army on the march would halt every afternoon to build a fortified camp for the night. The legionary often had to carry a spade or pickax and a couple of sharpened wooden stakes, along with a thick wool blanket that doubled as a cloak in cold weather. In rainy weather he got wet, unless the ox-drawn baggage wagons made it through the mud with their cargo of heavy leather tents.

Today, though, things are a bit different. After everything that we have mentioned earlier, it is hard to imagine that there will be room for anything else in a paratrooper’s ALICE pack. However, don’t underestimate the ingenuity of the American airborne troops or, for that matter, the strength of their backs! When fully loaded, a paratroop’s rucksack will be stuffed with rain/cold-weather gear, a change of underwear, fresh socks, the rations and water for at least three days that we mentioned earlier, a first-aid kit, and a few personal items (like a shaving kit and maybe a paperback book to read during the flight to the drop zone). With these and other simple items, you might be surprised just how comfortable paratroopers can make themselves.

For example, almost every soldier packs a stainless-steel cup and some utensils. Some even bring along tiny portable camp stoves, fueled by small tanks of liquid propane, to heat water for coffee or reconstituting freeze-dried rations. The soldier also carries a tightly rolled sleeping bag and a waterproof “poncho,” a versatile hooded, sleeveless raincoat. For cold weather, there is a blanket-like poncho liner. Many troops also carry a “Space Blanket.” This is a layer of Mylar (aluminum bonded to a thin plastic sheet) with a sturdy quilted cover for use as a ground cloth. Using these things, a trained trooper can usually get a warm night’s sleep in anything except arctic or mountain conditions. Another tiny but important item is a kit of camouflage makeup, or “face paint.” The human eye and brain have evolved to recognize human faces at long range, and the face and hands are normally the only part of the soldier not covered by the BDU. There are about five different colors of face paint, suitable for camouflaging light-skinned or dark-skinned soldiers. The idea is to apply a pattern that breaks up the normal outlines recognizable as a face. You can use a mirror, or have a buddy apply the stuff.

The soldier’s rucksack will also contain a shaving kit, foot powder, and a couple of clean towels (also colored olive-drab!). There may also be two small plastic vials, issued with the approval of the unit’s medical officer. These are “go” and “stop” pills. This is a controversial subject, but a familiar one to combat veterans. “Go” pills are based on amphetamine, a drug discovered in the 1880s and widely used by the German Army in World War II to keep troops awake and alert for extended periods. “Stop” pills are a fast-acting barbiturate designed to induce rapid sleep. The rationale for using such drugs is obvious. In combat, since airborne troops may have to stay awake and alert for up to seventy-two hours, “go” pills can provide a vital edge. This is because after three days without sleep, even superbly conditioned troops will begin to drop out, hallucinate, or just generally become combat-ineffective. On the flip side, it may also be impossible for troops under combat stress (not to mention jet lag from traveling halfway around the world) to establish normal sleep patterns. Thus the need for the “stop” pills. Such chemicals can help, and in an Army with zero tolerance for drug abuse, there is little danger that they will be used in an inappropriate manner.

One last item that paratroops always carry is rope, since one of the greatest hazards of parachuting is a tree landing. All jumpers are issued a coil of green nylon rope, just in case they need help getting down from a fouled canopy. Usually airborne troopers carry more rope and cord, just in case. Even if they were raised in the city, most soldiers know enough field craft to bring along plenty of extra line stowed in their rucksack.

All of this adds up to a load easily approaching 120 lb/54.4 kg. Add it to the 50-lb/22.7-kg weight of the T-10M main/reserve parachute system, and you can see why paratroops have to waddle just to get up the ramps of their drop aircraft. Unfortunately, there is little prospect that the paratroop’s load is going to decrease anytime soon. Despite gradual but impressive improvements in lightweight materials, the Army always finds new ways to load up the paratroops. So much so that today’s troopers jump heavier than their World War II counterparts. The coming of new electronic gadgets that improve the infantry’s combat power and efficiency has added even more weight and complexity to the soldier’s load.

The approaching 21st century is unlikely to improve the trooper’s lot, since the folks at the Army’s battle labs keep forgetting that men have to carry all this stuff on their backs, not on some lab bench. The best that the troopers of the 82nd can hope for is that the top generals who themselves wear the silver wings will remember what it was like to once lug a soldier’s load around the battlefield, and will keep the “lab weenies” in check.

For all that we have told you about the strength and endurance of the paratroops, they do not go into battle without some assistance from automotive power. When the 82nd Airborne drops into action, it does so with a relatively large and diverse fleet of wheeled vehicles to provide movement for heavy and support weapons, and to move supplies and troops across the battlefield. The key to this has been the development of several families of wheeled vehicles that can not only survive the rigors of the battlefield environment, but still operate after being parachuted out of a perfectly good airplane! In fact, the first vehicles, usually armed with heavy infantry weapons, will already be in the drop zone before the first paratrooper goes out the door. Later, all kinds of wheeled vehicles will appear in the drop zone, helping to expand the airborne toehold into a full-blown airhead for supporting the division in the field. Let’s take a brief look at some of the major vehicles in this armada.

M998 High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV)

It was a tall order to replace the Army’s vaunted Jeep. However, the HMMWV, also known as the “Hummer,” has more than filled these large shoes. The M998 series of four-wheel-drive trucks is the bread and butter of the Army’s light-truck fleet. The HMMWV is used for practically every role imaginable for a vehicle, including operating as a troop transport, antitank and surface-to-air missile carrier, and ambulance. Manufactured by the AM General Corporation in South Bend, Indiana, the HMMWV is the most widely used vehicle in the U.S. military.

The basic model of the M998 is the cargo/troop carrier which can carry up to ten seated troops. The payload for the HMMWV is 2,500 1b/1,134 kg, and the maximum towed load is 3,400 1b/1,542 kg. The Hummer is fitted with a GM V8 6.2-liter engine with diesel fuel injection which produces 150 horsepower driving a three-speed automatic transmission. Many other variants of the Hummer are also in service and greatly contribute to the effectiveness of the 82nd Airborne. These variants include an armament carrier which can be fitted with heavy machine guns or a Mk 19 40mm automatic grenade launcher, a TOW-2 antitank-missile-carrying version, and ambulance variants which can carry four litters or eight ambulatory patients. There are also variants which have been up-armored to provide maximum protection for crew members. These are just a few versions of the HMMWV, and it seems that every time you take another look, AM General has produced a new variant to fill yet another solution.

As important as the usefulness of the HMMWV vehicle is, it is never going to be an airborne favorite unless it is light and easily transportable. Thus it is a matter of great pride to AM General that with a weight of around 10,000 lb/4,535 kg, the HMMWV can be carried by a single UH- 60L Blackhawk helicopter. Additionally, an Army CH-47 Chinook can carry two of them, and a C-5 Galaxy heavy transport can carry up to fifteen, fully loaded for battle! As an interesting side note which also happens to be of great importance to the 82nd Airborne Division, nearly all models of the Hummer can be deployed by conventional cargo parachutes in order to give the 82nd some help in those “not so friendly” landing zones. This is becoming more important as armed HMMWVs take over more of the direct fire-support missions that had been planned for the now-canceled M-8 Armored Gun System.

M939 5-Ton Truck

While the M998 is a good all-around vehicle, it is not heavy enough to fulfill all of the Army’s transport needs. The vehicle one size up from the HMMWV is called the M939, and is often referred to as the Army’s standard 5-ton truck. Technically speaking, the M939 is a 6x6 wheeled tactical cargo vehicle. The newest model now entering service is the M939A2, which has earned an excellent reputation as a replacement to the Army’s legendary “deuce-and-a-half” series of trucks. The first M939s began rolling off the production line in 1982 with tens of thousands being produced. Since that time the M939 has been given two major upgrades and has also been widely exported to America’s allies. The first modification to the M939 was known as the M939A1, but only a limited number of these vehicles were produced compared to the many thousands of other variants. The M939A1 models were fitted with several types of tire modifications. Production, however, soon shifted to a newer model.

In 1989, the M939A2 began to enter service. One of its best traits is a high-tech central tire-inflation system which allows the crew to increase or decrease the tire air pressure in order to improve the M939A2’s mobility in soft soil or mud conditions. It’s all as simple as flipping a switch from inside the truck’s cab. Built by BMY Corp. of Marysville, Ohio, the M939A2 has a 240-horsepower Cummings Diesel engine which provides a top road speed of 55 mph/88.5 kph and a range of about 550 miles/880 kilometers. Most importantly, the M939A2 is capable of towing loads in excess of 20,000 lb/9,071 kg. This fact alone makes the M939 very “sexy” to many Army logisticians. To the front-line troops, though, this is their “heavy” prime mover of weapons, equipment, and supplies.

Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck

Not everything that the Army needs to transport weighs seventy tons like an M1A2 Abrams main battle tank. On the other hand, neither can everything in the 82nd’s inventory be transported by 2.5- or 5-ton vehicles like the M998 and M929A2. The Oshkosh Truck Corporation came up with an answer to this medium transport void, and was awarded the contract for the Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT) family of trucks. This family of vehicles utilizes a common chassis and cab to provide a variety of transport services. This includes everything from fuel distribution to tractor and vehicle wrecker/recovery services.

One of the more interesting variants is the PLS or Palletized Loading System. The PLS is a basic HEMTT chassis also being fitted with specialized material-handling equipment as well as a winch. The PLS weighs over 130,000 lb/58,966 kg, is 59 feet/18 meters long (including truck and trailer), and is capable of carrying 16.5 tons/15 metric tons of palletized cargo. Powered by a 500-horsepower Detroit Diesel engine, the PLS is a very big truck. The primary load for this large vehicle is the massive quantities of ammunition needed to keep a modern combat unit in action. When ammo, gas, or almost anything gets transported out onto the modern battlefield, you can bet that somewhere along the way, it was carried by an HEMTT truck.

You might be surprised to find that in a parachute unit like the 82nd Airborne Division, there are a large number of helicopters assigned to provide firepower and support. These aircraft are normally flown into the division’s airhead as soon as the drop zone is fully secured. Once there, they are assembled and flown to a forward fueling and arming point (FFARP) which they operate from. This gives the division commander an organic, brigade-sized aviation unit to provide attack, reconnaissance, air assault, transport, and electronic warfare support, all of which makes the 82nd’s aviation brigade one of the crown jewels of its combat force.

As of 1996, the 82nd Aviation Brigade has been fully modernized with airframes of relatively new production. Gone are the Vietnam-era AH-1F Cobra attack helicopters, OH-58A/C Kiowa scouts, and UH-1 “Huey” utility birds. Now the brigade has brand-new OH-58D Kiowa Warrior scout/attack helicopters, as well as UH-60L versions of the proven Blackhawk utility chopper. The 82nd’s aviation brigade provides the division with badly needed firepower, scouting, and transport services. Given the “leg” mobility of the rest of the division’s fighting units, you can understand why I want to spend some time showing their aircraft to you.

Bell-Textron OH-58D Kiowa Warrior

The OH-58D Kiowa Warrior is the light attack/scout helicopter that equips the scout/attack squadron of the 82nd Airborne Division’s Aviation Brigade. The basic airframe, which first flew in 1966 as the Bell Model 206 Jet Ranger, is used in the civilian world for television traffic and news reporting, as well as business/VIP transport. In 1996 the OH-58D entered its twelfth year of production, with over 250 units converted from earlier configurations. The Army’s “procurement objective” is a total of 382, including those used in training units at Fort Rucker, Alabama, and Fort Eustis, Virginia. Maximum gross weight of this agile little helicopter is 5,500 lb/2,495 kg with a crew of two.

The crew sits side by side in a fairly tight cockpit, with the pilot on the right and observer on the left. As in most Army helicopters, the controls are duplicated, but only the pilot has a heads-up display (HUD). A single Allison T703 turboshaft engine, rated at 650 hp (485 kw), drives a four-bladed main rotor and the twin-blade tail rotor. Maximum speed is 127 kn/237 kph in a “clean” configuration, without armament. Typical cruising speed is 110 kn/204 kph. A removable armament pylon on each side of the fuselage can be fitted with a variety of weapons, depending on the mission. Against a heavy armored threat, you would carry up to four laser-guided AGM-114 Hellfire missiles (two on each side). Against an infantry or low-intensity threat, you might carry a seven-round pod of 70mm/2.75” rockets on one side and a.50-caliber machine gun pod (on the left pylon only). If the enemy has helicopters, you might even carry a two-round Stinger air-to-air missile launcher.

The most striking feature of the OH-58D is the McDonnell Douglas /Northrop mast-mounted sight (MMS), which looks rather like the bloated head of a long-necked, three-eyed space alien, stuck on top of the rotor hub. The MMS is an amazing piece of mechanical and electro-optical engineering. The rotor hub of a helicopter in flight is about the nastiest vibration environment you can imagine, unless you happen to live inside a washing machine. However, the TV camera, laser range finder/designator, and thermal imager inside the MMS must not only be in perfect alignment with one another, they have to be “stabilized” to maintain a rock-steady line of sight, no matter how violently the helicopter is jinking through the air. The MMS does all this and more. It is integrated with a fire-control computer and display systems that allow the crew to locate, designate, and prosecute targets at night, in fog, dust storms, smoke, or in just about any combination of abominable flying conditions you care to imagine. For night operations, the crews wear night-vision goggles. One of the less pleasant features of the aircraft is the lack of air-conditioning. In hot weather, crews often fly with the doors off. This improves the ventilation, but increases the drag and noise levels.

For the 82nd Airborne Division, the neatest thing about the OH-58D is how easily it can be packed into a cargo plane, and how quickly it can be unpacked upon arrival. The rotor disc is 35 feet/10.7 meters in diameter, but the four rotor blades can be folded to lie parallel to the fuselage. The MMS can then be removed or installed in about ten minutes with simple hand tools. AC-141 can carry up to four Kiowa Warriors, and a C-130 Hercules pair.

In the 1991 Gulf War, Army OH-58Ds, developed for special missions under the previously “black” Prime Chance program, were star performers.[27] Operating from Navy ships, they liberated the first Kuwaiti territory, shooting up the hapless Iraqi garrison of tiny Qurah Island and landing troops to round up prisoners. They knocked out numerous Iraqi patrol boats, oil platforms, and coast defense missile sites. In addition, older (and unarmed) OH-58Ds were the tip of the point of the spearhead, leading the 2nd Armored Cavalry’s advance into Iraq, providing critical real-time intelligence that helped to rout Saddam’s “elite” Revolutionary Guards. Along with providing laser designation for precision weapons like Hellfire missiles, 155mm Copperhead guided projectiles, and Air Force Paveway-series guided bombs, they performed superbly in the oldest aerial combat mission, conventional artillery spotting.

The Army hopes to eventually replace Kiowa Warrior with the Boeing /Sikorsky RAH-66 Comanche, a stealthy, all-digital, high-performance, and fearsomely expensive system, with an initial operating capability optimistically scheduled for July 2006. However, given the near-cancellation of the Comanche program several years ago, and the excellent value and popularity of the Kiowa Warrior, plan on seeing the OH-58D in production for some years to come.

Sikorsky UH-60L Blackhawk

Blackhawk is the Army’s all-purpose utility helicopter, replacing the classic UH-1 “Huey.”[28] The Army lost several thousand helicopters in Vietnam, and in the process learned a great deal about how to make helicopters survivable. Every one of those lessons was incorporated into the design of the UH-60 Blackhawk, which entered service in 1978. All critical systems are armored or redundant, and the airframe is designed like a Volvo to crush on impact in a way that protects the crew and passengers. Maximum gross weight for the UH-60L is 22,000 1b/10,000 kg. It is powered by two T-701 engines, each rated at 1,940 shp. These drive a single four-bladed main rotor 53.6 ft/16.36 m in diameter and a four-bladed tail rotor. The rotor blades and tail can be folded, so that the UH-60 will fit in a variety of transport planes. About 1,400 have been delivered, and the Army is still buying about 60 of the — L models per year.

The Blackhawk’s basic mission is hauling people and stuff around the battlefield. The people ride inside: two pilots, an enlisted crew chief who doubles as door gunner when required, and up to a full squad of eleven combat-equipped troops.[29] The stuff usually dangles off a hook under the fuselage as a sling load of up to 9,000 lb/4,090 kg. This might be a Hummer, a 105mm artillery piece, a couple of fuel bladders, or a pallet of rations, ammunition, or other vital supplies. Another vital mission is “medevac,” picking up casualties and delivering them to the nearest field hospital. Knowing that medevac helicopters are only a few minutes away is one of the greatest single morale boosters for troops in combat. Also, at least one utility helicopter will probably be a flying command post for each brigade commander, or his deputy. This provides instant “high ground” when the commander needs to see the battlefield. One other important role is that of electronic warfare (EW). The 82nd’s Military Intelligence Battalion is assigned three EH-60 Quick Fix EW helicopters to provide communications direction finding and jamming services.

For most soldiers, there is no weapon like a heavy weapon if you have a tough objective to take or hold. Under such conditions, having a machine gun, grenade launcher, or mortar can make all the difference between taking an objective or suffering a bloody repulse. The weapons that we are about to look at all provide such services for infantry forces, though some are so heavy that an HMMWV weapons carrier will be required to move them around the battlefield. Still, these are essential tools for any infantry force trying establish a base of fire to support combat operations.

Browning M2 HB.50-caliber (12.7mm) Machine Gun

The heavy machine gun is a specialist weapon, found mainly in the heavy weapons (“Delta”) company of an infantry battalion. A burst of heavy machine gun fire can shred a wooden building or a truck, and penetrate the side or rear of many armored vehicles at short range. The “fifty” or “deuce,” as it is known, is a rugged, accurate, and reliable recoil-operated weapon designed by John M. Browning. “Recoil-operated” means that an ingenious mechanism of levers, cams, and springs captures some of the recoil energy or “kick” from the powerful cartridge in order to extract and eject the spent cartridge case, cock the firing pin, advance the ammunition belt, and feed the next round. The “fifty” was originally built as a water-cooled heavy machine gun, and entered service with the U.S. Army in 1919, just a bit too late for the First World War. The air-cooled HB (heavy-barrel) model was developed during the 1920s.

During the Second World War, the M2 was the main armament of many Allied aircraft, and was mounted on every class of Navy ship, as well as on a wide variety of Army vehicles and ground mountings. After the war, the Army used it mainly as a short-ranged antiaircraft weapon. By itself, the gun weighs 84 lb/38 kg, and each 100-round box of belted ammunition weighs 35 lb/16 kg. The rate of fire is an impressive 550 rounds per minute. The theoretical maximum range is 4.2 mi/6.8 km, and the M2 has actually been used for indirect fire at high angles of elevation to create a “fire-beaten zone” on the far side of a hill. The practical maximum range for aimed direct fire is about 1 mi/1.6 km. The copper-plated steel.50-caliber projectile has a superb aerodynamic shape, and there are many kinds of ammunition, including ball (solid), armor-piercing, tracer, armor-piercing incendiary, and blank (for training). In the 82nd Airborne the M2 is mainly used on a pintle mount on top of the Hummer light vehicle. It also backs up the Stinger missiles in the turret on the Avenger air defense vehicle, and it is often carried in a pod mount on the side of OH-58D scout helicopters. Amazingly, after seventy years, the M2 remains in production. This is in spite of the fact that although the gun itself never wears out, we need to maintain the tooling and industrial base to produce spare parts and barrels. The current contractor is Saco Defense, Inc., in Maine, and the 1996 unit cost for a new one was $14,000.

M-240G Medium Machine Gun

The M60 7.62mm machine gun, based on the World War II German MG-42 design, gave the U.S. Army many years of good service, but it was mechanically complex, and prone to jamming. It has been replaced in active Army units by the M240G, a ground-based version of the original M240 manufactured by the Belgian Fabrique Nationale firm as a coaxial machine gun for tanks and other armored vehicles. The cyclic rate of fire is 650 to 950 rounds per minute (rpm), but there are settings for 200 rpm (“rapid fire”) and 100 rpm (“sustained fire”). The effective range is 1.1 mi/1.8 km. The M240G is modified for ground use by installing an “infantry modification kit,” comprising a flash suppresser, front sight, carrying handle for the barrel, buttstock, pistol grip, bipod, and rear sight assembly. The weight (without ammunition) is only 24.2 1b/11 kg. The main ammunition types are ball, tracer, and blank. In the 82nd Airborne, the M240G is normally found in the heavy weapons platoon of the rifle company. The M240G can also be rigged as a door gun on transport helicopters.

The improved durability of the M240 system results in superior reliability and maintainability compared to the old M60. In the words of one Marine officer, “Unlike the M60, this gun works.” During field tests, more than fifteen thousand rounds were fired through each prototype M240, with very few jams or breakdowns. The M60, in contrast, required barrel changes every hundred rounds.

Mark 19 Mod. 3 40mm Machine Gun

Originally developed to arm river patrol boats of the U.S. Navy in Vietnam, the Mk 19 is actually a fully automatic 40mm grenade launcher. After a long and troubled development period (it was nicknamed the “Dover Dog”), the Mk 19 entered service in 1981. The Army took over management of the program in 1988, and gradually the level of reliability has grown. The Mk 19 was designed to fit on the same mountings as the.50-caliber machine gun, and fires the same 40mm ammunition as the Army’s M203 or M79 single-shot grenade launchers.

The stubby, belt-fed Mk 19 weighs 72.5 lb/33 kg and uses the simple “blowback” principle to feed the ammunition. This has the bolt and receiver assembly recoiling against a heavy spring, catching the next round and firing it on the rebound. The cyclic rate of fire is over 300 rpm, but the practical rate is about 40 rpm in short bursts. Against point targets, like vehicles or buildings, the maximum effective range is around 1,500 meters/1,640 yards. Against area targets, like an entrenched enemy position, the maximum range is 2,200 meters/2,400 yards. The explosive fragmentation round can kill or wound exposed personnel for a radius of 5 meters/16.4 feet, and the antiarmor round can penetrate up to 2 in/51 mm of armor plate. In the 82nd Airborne, the Mk 19 is found mainly in the weapons platoon of the infantry company, mounted on the roof of a Hummer. It is also mounted on the 5-ton truck, and can be fired from a tripod mount on the ground.

As with any military unit, airborne troops face threats from the entire spectrum of technology. The primary enemies to these soldiers (other than enemy infantry) are twofold: armor, which includes tanks and armored vehicles, and aircraft, which includes both fixed-wing and rotary-wing types.

During the Cold War, the West held a general superiority in aircraft, and many felt confident that the air forces of the NATO nations would be able to establish air superiority over the battlefield if hostilities were to have erupted in a NATO/Warsaw Pact clash. This was not the case, however, with tanks. The Warsaw Pact armies in general and the Russian Army in particular held such a vast numerical superiority over the NATO nations in tanks that there was little doubt that the American Army would be in deep trouble in any battle. To counter these threats, the American military began to build up an enormous stockpile of antitank weapons.

Today, these same weapons provide the 82nd Airborne with its last heavy direct-fire capability. This is because the M-8 AGS, which was to have replaced the aging M551 Sheridan light tank, was canceled in 1996. Then the Sheridan itself was ordered taken out of service. These measures were based upon a need to reprogram modernization funds for operational contingencies, which is a fancy way of saying “the Bosnia Peacekeeping Force.” As such, it is the lighter XVIII Airborne Corps formations like the 82nd Airborne and the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment (Light) which have paid the price for these ill-considered budget decisions. It remains to be seen if that price will involve dead troopers.

BGM-71 TOW Anti-Tank Missile

The first major break for the U.S. Army in the field of antitank missiles was the TOW (Tube-Launched, Optically Tracked, Wire-Guided) antitank missile. Manufactured by Hughes Aircraft Company, and given the code name BGM-71, this heavy antitank missile first entered service in 1970. Since then, TOW has continued on as the premier heavy antitank missile operated by the Army. What the TOW did for the Army was enable any small vehicle, from a jeep to an armored personal carrier, to engage and defeat an enemy main battle tank, thus evening the balance of power for allied land forces. Today’s version of the TOW is very similar to those used in combat in Vietnam (1972) and the Middle East (1973), with several notable differences.

All TOW missiles have remarkably similar characteristics, with the biggest difference resulting in warhead size and operation. The current model is the TOW-2, of which the Army has three variants: TOW-2 (BGM- 71D), TOW-2A (BGM-71E), and TOW-2B (BGM-71F). TOW-2 was first introduced in 1983, and represented the first major improvement to the missile system since the Improved TOW missile, BGM-71C (ITOW), arrived on the scene several years earlier. Among the improvements from the original TOW missiles were a hardened guidance system to resist electro-optic countermeasures, a redesigned standoff probe, an improved flight motor, and a much larger and heavier warhead than either the basic TOW or ITOW As a result of the improved flight motor, while the overall TOW-2 missile is heavier than the earlier models, flight performance for the TOW-2 is not degraded. The new version, of which over 75,000 have been produced, is probably best known for its heavier warhead which adds dramatically to the stopping power of the missile. This new TOW missile had a 13-lb/5.9-kg high-explosive antitank (HEAT) warhead which was capable of penetrating over 35 in/900 mm of armored plate on a tank or other armored-vehicle. When compared to the original, basic TOW, this was a vast improvement.

As the Russians began equipping their tank forces with better and better tanks, they also began the dangerous (from an American point of view) practice of using explosive reactive armor to protect them. Reactive armor, first invented by the Israelis, posed a serious problem for Western antitank weapons designers. The basic principle for reactive armor is simple. Small boxes of explosive were fitted in a fashion so that they covered the parts of a tank most likely to get hit by a missile. As the antitank missile approached, a sensor would detect the incoming missile and, milliseconds before the incoming missile hit, the reactive armor would detonate outward, diffusing the force of the missile’s HEAT warhead.

Russia soon caught on to this ingenious new defensive system, and in the mid-1980s began rapidly equipping a growing number of its new tanks with reactive armor. Overnight, it seemed as if the Russians had turned the tide of armored warfare back in the direction of the mighty tank. However, Hughes was ready with a new solution, the TOW-2A model. Designed to defeat tanks and other vehicles fitted with reactive armor, the TOW-2A version had a remarkable device — a tandem warhead. In the small probe fitted in the front of the TOW-2A missile, Hughes managed to fit a tiny “precursor” warhead. The precursor warhead is designed to set off the explosive fitted in a tank’s reactive armor. With the reactive armor now detonated, the tank is vulnerable to attack from the TOW-2A’s powerful main HEAT warhead, which is exactly the same type used for the TOW-2.

Still, technology moved on, and it soon appeared that in the late 1990s and beyond tank armor would continue to improve. If so, it might not be enough for the TOW missiles to just “trick” the reactive armor — since the tank’s main armor was now getting stronger and thicker. A new solution was needed. Again, Hughes and the entire TOW team met the challenge. It was decided that in the future there would always be one specific spot which was the primary vulnerability for a tank — the top. All around, a tank is protected by heavy protective armor. The top, though, is a tank’s Achilles heel. Therefore, the new TOW-2B was designed to attack the tank from the top down. The TOW-2B (BGM-71F), the newest model in service, began entering the Army by 1991, and used a new kind of warhead to defeat enemy armor. When the missile flies over a target, sensors trigger the two Explosive Formed Penetrator (EFP) warheads. The EFPs shoot their penetrators in a downward direction at over Mach 5 into the thin-skinned armor of the tank’s top. Today, there is no tank design in the world capable of standing up to the punishment of a TOW-2B.

Also, starting in 1995, the guidance system has been improved with the introduction of the Texas Instruments Improved Target Acquisition Sight (ITAS) package. ITAS gives the TOW gunner on an HMMWV a vastly better-quality picture than earlier sights, especially at night and in bad weather. Given this series of facelifts, expect the TOW-2 series of missiles to continue to serve the military forces of America and their allies for many years into the 21st century.

Javelin Antitank Missile

Good as it is, there are some shortcomings to the TOW system. The biggest of these is that it is heavy: too heavy to be broken down into man-sized loads. Since the airborne soldiers’ thinking is, if you can’t carry it, don’t bring it! the TOW did not fit in very well with the basic airborne trooper’s philosophy. What the airborne troopers really needed was a smaller, lighter antiarmor system that could defeat current armored threats at good ranges.

The original solution for this infantry requirement was the medium-range Dragon antitank missile system. Now sorely out of date, the Dragon missile system required a soldier to sit down on the ground and pick a tank out with his sighting system. Once the target was in the sighting system, the soldier could then launch the missile. As long as the soldier kept the guidance scope crosshairs aimed at the tank, the missile would hopefully hit.

Unfortunately, there were many drawbacks to the Dragon system. To begin with, the missile traveled extremely slowly, so that the soldier firing the missile needed to keep his target in the crosshairs for a dangerously long period of time. Another drawback to the Dragon was that it had a very powerful initial recoil which tended to “push” the operator and thus the missile towards the ground, often causing dangerous misfires. Also, the warhead of the Dragon missile was not powerful enough to destroy modern-day MBTs. Everyone involved knew that a new system would be needed as soon as the money became available.

In 1988, Texas Instruments joined with Martin Marietta on the AAWSM project (now called Javelin) in the hopes of producing an effective Dragon replacement. Since then, the two companies have worked together to create a missile which has met and exceeded all performance requirements set for the program. The Javelin system consists of just two elements: the Command Launch Unit (CLU) and the missile round. The CLU is a small and lightweight (14.1 lb/6.4 kg) target-acquisition device which includes a day/thermal sight using a Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) imaging system, launch controls, and gunner’s eye-piece/display. Magnification using the thermal sight can be up to nine times normal vision, and the CLU has enough battery power for four hours of operation.

The missile-round portion of the system consists of the actual Javelin missile and the Launch Tube Assembly (LTA). The LTA is an expendable launch tube which holds the Javelin missile and provides an interface/mounting to the CLU. The total carry weight for the LTA is 91b/4.1 kg. Each LTA is 47.2 in/119.8 cm long and 5.6 in/14.2 cm in diameter. The actual Javelin missile is a fire-and-forget missile weighing 26.1 lb/11.8 kg, and is 42.6 in/110 cm long and 5 in/12.7 cm in diameter. The missile is packaged inside the disposable LTA and has a shelf life of ten years. The entire system can be ready to launch in just thirty seconds and can be reloaded for another shot in less than twenty. This means that a two-man airborne Javelin team will probably be able to jump with a CLU (with spare batteries) as well as a pair of missiles into a drop zone, and be able to then move out on foot. However, a Hummer loaded with spare missile rounds and batteries will probably be added to make the teams more mobile.

Through an advanced Imaging Infrared (IIR) guidance system, the missile locks onto its target before launch and then automatically guides itself towards the target. Propulsion for the system is provided by a two-stage solid-propellant rocket motor. Since the missile has a “soft launch” rocket motor, which reduces recoil and backblast, it can even be launched from the safety of an enclosed position. The Javelin warhead is a tandem shape-charged type, which enables it to defeat even modern reactive armor. Range for the Javelin system, which is just beginning to enter service, is over 1.2 mi/2 km, and extended-range versions are being considered as a possible replacement for the TOW.

The Javelin engagement sequence is quite simple. Once the operator has identified a target with the CLU, the other member of the team will attach the missile to the CLU, and this begins the engagement process. Once the CLU operator has rechecked the view through his eyepiece, he sends a “lock-on-before-launch” message to the missile, causing the missile seeker to begin tracking the target on its own. With the missile locked onto its target, and either a direct or a top-attack flight profile selected, Javelin is ready to fire. Once launched, the missile flies towards its target, and most probably will destroy any armored vehicle in sight. In particular, the missile will go after the particular thermal target seen with its IIR seeker, and not just any “hot” object in the field of view. The Javelin’s “brilliant” guidance seeker uses advanced digital-signal-processing technology to minimize the chances of a “friendly fire” kill, which is going to make this missile a real favorite on the battlefield.

If there is any problem in the Javelin program these days, it is the pressure of being the “only game in town” for “leg” infantry. With the cancellation of AGS and the pending retirement (as of July 1st, 1997) of the Sheridan, Javelin has been given the bulk of the direct-fire tasks in the 82nd Airborne. This is a lot to ask of a new weapon that has yet to enter general service in the U.S. military. You can feel the strain on the TI/Martin corporate team, as well as the Army program office. Still, it looks like Javelin is “the little missile that can.” Let us pray, for the sake of the 82nd’s troopers, that it is.

M-136/AT-4 Antitank Rocket

Three types of man-portable antitank weapons are currently in use with the XVIII Airborne Corps: Dragon, Javelin (which will soon replace Dragon), and the smallest system of the group — the unguided AT-4 antitank rocket. The AT-4 replaces the venerable M72 Light Antiarmor Weapon (LAW), which first came into service in the 1960s. By the early 1980s, though, the LAW was becoming old and useless against newer Soviet tanks. While revolutionary for its day, by the 1980s the M72 LAW was in desperate need of replacement. The Army therefore decided, after a fierce international competition, that the U.S. military would buy a domestically produced version of the disposable Swedish Bofors “Carl Gustav” 84mm antitank rocket. Built under license from the Swedes by Alliant Techsystems, the missile was designated the M-136/AT-4 rocket. The AT-4 entered service with the American Army and Marine Corps in the late 1980s, and remains in service today. Weighing just 6.7 kg/14.8 lb, the 1-m/39.4-in-long AT-4 has a maximum range of more than 300 meters/328 yards against moving targets and 500 meters/547 yards against stationary targets. The warhead is capable of penetrating over 400 mm/15 in of armor plate, making the AT-4 capable of defeating over 95 percent of the armored targets found on the modern battlefield.

The AT-4’s firing sequence is as easy as could be: simply pull the safety pin, unsnap the shoulder stop, and place the weapon on your shoulder. Next you release the sight, pull the cocking lever, and aim at the target. All there is left to do is to push the red safety catch and pull the trigger. You needn’t brace yourself for a tremendous recoil either — the average recoil force for the AT-4 is comparable to that of the M16 combat rifle. Once the missile leaves its launch tube, it flies a flat trajectory to the target. Once the missile hits the target, the powerful HEAT warhead detonates, destroying (hopefully) the target.

The AT-4 has been a good value for the U.S. military. The weapon’s light weight makes it easy for one soldier to carry and use. It is also extremely rugged, and has demonstrated a reliability of over 95 percent in combat. However, the AT-4 has two drawbacks. The first of these is that it is not capable of destroying heavy tanks or vehicles fitted with reactive armor. The second problem is that the AT-4 is unguided, so accuracy is not up to par with that of a guided missile such as TOW or Javelin. One of the ways that the military has been able to dramatically increase AT-4 gunner performance is with extensive use of the M287 trainer model. The firing sequence is exactly the same as that for the AT-4 except that instead of firing a rocket, a 9mm tracer bullet is fired, showing the user where the round has hit. This enables any soldier to inexpensively train for actual AT-4 use without the high cost of expending actual rounds. However, there is already a program to replace the AT-4 in at least part of its mission. The new weapon is called Predator.

Predator Antitank Missile

The two primary shortcomings of the AT-4 (no guidance system and a lack of reactive armor penetration) caused the Army to quickly realize that eventually the rocket would need to be replaced. The Marines took the lead on this effort, because like the airborne, they needed to deal with heavy armored threats while also balancing their need to remain light rapid-response troops. They were the first service to decide to begin a program to replace the AT-4 beginning in the next century. What the Marines decided they wanted was a disposable, short-range, man-portable, day/night/adverse-weather, guided weapon capable of defeating any heavy armored threat into the foreseeable future. Five companies were selected in 1989 to participate in Phase I of what became known as the Short Range Attack (SRAW) missile program. After being overlooked in Phase I, Loral Aeronutronic (now part of Lockheed Martin) won the SRAW competition in 1990, and was awarded a demonstration/validation contract. The missile was named Predator, and is designed to put a powerful guided antitank weapon into the hands of any ordinary foot soldier.

With a range of over 750 meters and the capability to defeat heavy armor, the Predator will soon enter service with the U.S. Marine Corps. The U.S. Army, while seeing the need for a weapon like Predator, was slower to respond. Most likely, it did not want to jeopardize the funding for the Javelin program. If the Army had asked the DoD or Congress for the cheaper (and shorter-range) Predator, the funding for the Javelin might have been cut. Recently, though, the Army has decided that more than a short-range antiarmor weapon, it needs a direct-attack weapon to defeat bunkers. This resulted in what the Army calls the Multi-Purpose Individual Munition (MPIM) SRAW. The missile uses the same launcher and nearly the same missile as the Marines’ Predator, though with a different warhead. The MPIM/SRAW can be used to attack such targets as bunkers, reinforced concrete structures, and light armored vehicles. Because the launcher is the same for the Predator as for the MPIM/SRAW, all the Army would have to do to acquire an antitank variant would be to start buying the Predator missiles under the Marine program. Either way, the Predator/MPIM systems will dramatically change the way a soldier of the future views any obstacles his enemy can throw his way.

FIM-92 Stinger/Avenger Surface-to-Air Missile System

Is it possible for a weapon system to have such great value on the battlefield that it actually turns the political tide of a war? If so, the man-portable Stinger SAM is just such a system. In the 1980s the Reagan Administration made the decision to supply advanced Stinger man-portable surface-to-air missiles to the Mujahadeen rebels fighting the occupying Soviet armies in Afghanistan. Several years later, the Soviets withdrew their forces — defeated. Many in both America and the former Soviet Union firmly believe that if any single factor contributed to this withdrawal, it was the fact that the Russian helicopters and aircraft were unable to fly unhindered and gain control of the air in such a fashion as to provide support for their troops on the ground. Stingers in the hands of the Mujahadeen were the reason.

What type of weapon can have this type of impact? Well, the Stinger missile was designed to replace the Redeye man-portable SAM system which entered service with the U.S. military in 1967. The problem with the Redeye was that it was a “tail-chase” weapon, which meant that the Redeye’s infrared seeker needed a very hot heat source to home in on in order to lock onto its target. This was usually possible only when chasing after the heat plume coming from the rear of a jet’s engine. Unfortunately, soldiers usually only see the rear of an enemy aircraft’s jet after it drops its bombs onto the target. Thus the Redeye could usually engage the aircraft only after it was too late. Another disadvantage of the Redeye system was that it could only attack aircraft that were flying Mach 1. Thus, if an enemy pilot wanted to escape a Redeye, all he needed to do was speed up. A final problem for Redeye was that it was a very easy missile to decoy. Even as the Redeye began to enter service in 1967, the Army and Marine Corps were aware that a somewhat more advanced man-portable SAM was needed. Design, development, and testing of a Redeye replacement took nearly a decade. It was worth the wait, however, and the result was the FIM-92 Stinger missile, which began to enter service in 1979.

The Stinger missile, manufactured by Hughes Missile System Company, is a truly incredible system which has been combat-proven time and time again. The system itself, sometimes referred to as MANPADS Stinger (Man-Portable Air-Defense System), consists of a fiberglass launcher assembly with missile, a grip stock, an argon gas-charged Battery/Coolant Unit (BCU), and an Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) Interrogator. The FIM-92 missile has a two-stage solid-propellant rocket motor with different types of infrared and/or ultraviolet guidance systems fitted for subsequent models of the missile (FIM-92A, 92B, 92C, etc.).

Stinger MANPADS are usually accompanied by a crew chief, a gunner, and some type of vehicle carrying extra Stinger reloads (often an HMMWV). Once a target is sighted, the gunner can interrogate it using the IFF transponder to establish if it is hostile. Seven tenths of a second after the IFF switch is pressed, an audible tone will inform the gunner if the target is friend or foe. Should the target prove hostile, the gunner can activate the system by energizing the BCU with the impulse generator switch. When sufficient UV/IR energy is received to get a lock-on, another audible signal indicates that the missile is ready for launch. The gunner then depresses the firing trigger and less than two seconds later, the ejector motor has ignited and the missile is on its way. Once Stinger has been launched, it is very difficult to decoy. This is especially true of later versions of the missile, which are highly jam- and decoy-resistant. After the entire launch sequence, the MANPADS crew can reload and engage another target almost immediately. The only drawback is that MANPADS cannot fire on the move.

To remedy this problem the Army and Marine Corps began buying the Avenger Pedestal-Mounted Stinger system. Manufactured by Boeing Defense and Space Group, the Avenger is the first successful fire-on-the-move SAM system to enter production. It combines the technology of the Stinger missile with the speed and mobility of the HMMWV chassis. The system has eight missiles fitted in a turret mounted on the Hummer. The system is highly mobile and can be carried into the field by transport aircraft as small as a C-130, as well as CH-46E and CH-47D helicopters. The entire system is somewhat more capable than the Stinger MANPADS system because the vehicle allows more capable targeting equipment to be carried. Examples of this are a low-cost FLIR sensor, an eye-safe laser range finder, and a heads-up optical sight. Another interesting capability of the Avenger is its ability to allow the crew to engage targets from remote positions over 150 feet/45.7 meters away from the fire unit by using a remote-control system. All in all, the Stinger MANPADS and Avenger systems provide an invaluable antiaircraft capability to airborne troops who otherwise would have to rely upon friendly aircraft and long-range SAMs (like the Patriot) to protect them. Those systems may not always be available when the 82nd lands. The Stinger/Avenger system will be.

EFOG-M Surface-to-Surface/Air Missile

A word should also be mentioned here about another new missile system known as EFOG-M or Enhanced Fiber Optic Guided Missile. It was originally known as N-LOS (Non-Line-of-Sight). The name was later changed to FOG-M, and then the program was canceled in 1990. It was revived a few years later, and has recently been given the name EFOG-M. The EFOG-M would be capable of attacking both ground and air targets using a fiber-optic data link system, with TV or Imaging Infrared as the main guidance package. The proposed missile would have a range of about 15 km/9.3 mi, and would be carried by a modified HMMWV vehicle. Current plans call for Raytheon Missile Systems, EFOG-M’s prime contractor, to manufacture sixteen fire units and three hundred missiles under the technology demonstrator phase. If the system is successful, it may begin to replace the Avenger and TOW systems sometime in the next century.

Artillery has always been a vital part of airborne operations, and its importance is still growing. With the cancellation of the AGS and retirement of the Sheridan light tank, tube artillery is the only large gun system left in airborne service. Airborne artillery units are different from their counterparts in other Army organizations. This is because they too drop out of the sky, and have to help the paratroops fight their way out of the drop zone. This means that they may have to do direct fire missions against enemy targets over open sights. This is almost unheard of in normal artillery units. At the same time, airborne artillery utilizes only the lightest and most portable of gun systems, so that as many tubes as possible can be delivered to the battlefield. These guns are the subjects of our next exploration.

M-119 105mm Howitzer

The M-119 105mm light howitzer is probably the last gun of its caliber that will ever be deployed in the U.S. military. Don’t plan on seeing the M-119 going into retirement, though, because its gunners and the units they support really love this system. Lightweight enough to be towed by a Hummer or slung from a helicopter, it is the most portable artillery system in the world other than mortars.

The development history for the M-119 actually started over thirty years ago in Great Britain. The idea for the M-119 was conceived way back in 1965 when the British Army realized that they would soon need a new 105mm light gun. After nearly a decade of development, the L118 Light Gun, manufactured by Royal Ordnance of the UK, entered service with Britain’s Army in 1974. This event went almost unnoticed in the United States Army, which was busy withdrawing its forces from Vietnam, and dealing with some very serious morale problems. At the time, American artillery officers felt that their current 105mm tube artillery systems, the M-101 and M-102, suited them just fine. This may have been true then, but as the years passed, so too did the U.S. Army’s requirements change.

When the U.S. Army finally decided to go shopping for a new light field gun, the L118 was their obvious choice for a number of reasons. First, it was extremely light and could be carried easily by a medium-lift helicopter or towed by a truck. Secondly, it was combat-proven in the Falklands War and had performed exceedingly well there. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, there would be no major development costs that the U.S. Army would have to shell out in order to develop their next-generation gun. If they bought the Royal Ordnance L118 105mm howitzer, they would be buying it “off the shelf” and saving a lot of money in the process. After evaluating the British gun for over a year, the decision to purchase an “Americanized” version of the L118 was finally made in 1986. The new artillery system would, except for the first 150 units, be manufactured under license in the U.S. as the M119 by the Watervliet Arsenal in New York and the Rock Island Arsenal in Illinois.

Since entering service with the U.S. Army, the M-119 has performed superbly. The entire system weighs only two tons, and is capable of firing the entire range of NATO-compatible 105mm shells including high-explosive, smoke, illumination, and HE rocket-assisted projectiles. The entire crew is made up of only seven soldiers, and the maximum range for the M-119 is 14.3 km/8.9 mi using conventional HE ammunition, and 19.5 km/12.1 mi using rocket-assisted projectiles. Because the M-119 is easily transported by a UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter and can be towed by an HMMWV truck, it is a perfect fit to fill the needs of the XVIII Airborne Corps. The 82nd has an entire battalion of these weapons (three batteries of six guns each) assigned to each of the three brigades in the division.

M-198 155mm Lightweight Howitzer

The heaviest tube artillery now used by the units of the XVIII Airborne Corps is the 155mm M-198. The M-198 field gun replaced the old M-114 in American service. There was much resistance to replacing this design with the newer (and heavier) M-198. However, the weight increases were more than worth it since the M-198 has much greater range than the M-114. The idea for the M-198 began in the late 1960s. Within two years, several prototypes had been delivered, and in 1978 the Rock Island Arsenal began to manufacture the M-198. Over one thousand M-198s are currently in service with the U.S. Army and Marine Corps.

While it is over three times as heavy as the M-119A1 (4,000 1b/1,800 kg versus 15,740 1b/6,961 kg), the M-198 is still helicopter-transportable, and can be carried by either the Army’s CH-47 Chinook or the Marine Ch-53E Super Stallion. The M-198 gun can also be towed by the M939A2 5-ton truck. The crew for the M-198 is composed of nine soldiers. The gun can hurl a rocket-assisted shell over 18.8 mi/30 km, and can toss a conventional projectile some 13.9 mi/22.4 km. The M-198 is capable of firing four rpm, and the lethal burst radius against exposed troops for a regular HE shell is over 150 feet/45.7 meters. In addition to the normal HE rounds, the M-198 can fire:

• Antitank Mines—The M-198 can fire both the M741 and the M718 rounds, each of which carry nine antitank mines.

• Laser-Guided Projectiles—The M-198 is also capable of firing the laser-guided Copperhead antitank round (M712) to a range of 16.4 km/10.2 mi. This round is highly accurate and extremely effective, attacking unsuspecting main battle tanks and other types of armored vehicles. Unfortunately, due to their extraordinary cost, only a few thousand were ever produced.

• HE/Antipersonnel/Armor—Several types of HE/antipersonnel/- armor rounds are available: including the M483, which contains eighty-eight dual-purpose grenades; the M692, which contains thirty-six antipersonnel mines; and the M731, which contains a similar number of antiarmor mines. The Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munition (DPICM) can also be fired by M-198s.

• Other Rounds—The M-198 can also fire illumination and smoke rounds, and future plans may also enable the M-198 to carry powerful SADARM (Sense And Destroy Armor) munitions, which will give the 155mm the capability to attack heavy armor formations without the need of a forward observer with a laser designator.

All in all, while the M-198 is heavy to lug around, it more than gets the job done where it counts: on the battlefield. In actual operations, each of the three brigades in the 82nd would be assigned a six-gun battery of M-198s from the XVIII Field Artillery Brigade.

Future Light Howitzer

The M-198 is heavy, but packs a punch. The M-119 is light, but lacks the power of the larger tube artillery pieces. In the future, the Army plans to deal with this dilemma by having a howitzer that will fit both roles even better than both the M-198 and the M-119. This will be the new Lightweight 155mm Howitzer. The Light Towed Howitzer program arose out of the requirement that rapid-deployment forces had for a light but powerful howitzer. To some degree the procurement of the M-119 dealt with this problem. However, a 155mm gun is still preferred and much more powerful than a 105mm (a 155mm shell has three times the lethality as one from a 105mm tube). How will this new lightweight howitzer be built? Currently it looks like advances in the field of metal alloys, specifically aluminum and titanium alloys, will offer the possibility of significant reductions in the weight of any new howitzer system. The required weight limit for this future howitzer is less than 9,000 lb/4,082 kg, so those companies bidding on this program had a difficult mission to deal with.

There are currently two favored gun designs which are competing against each other in the program. As surprising as it may seem, neither of these gun designs is American. Both originated in the United Kingdom. The first of these is from the Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering Limited (VSEL) company, which is now a part of the firm GEC™ Maritime. This company has produced the Ultra Lightweight Field Howitzer (UFH) for use by future rapid-deployment forces. The total weight of the UFH is only 8,250 lb/3,745 kg, and the system is able to fire conventional shells to a range of 27,000 yd/24.7 km, and rocket-assisted projectiles out to a maximum of 32,800 yd/30 km. These ranges are very similar to those achieved by the M-198, but the UFH’s weight is more than 5,000 lb/2,267 kg less. The UFH is capable of firing four rounds per minute in short bursts and two rounds per minute of sustained fire. The entire system, along with a seven-man crew, can be carried in a single lift by a UH-60L helicopter, and can also be towed by an HMMWV.

VSEL’s main competition for this program comes from Royal Ordnance, now a part of British Aerospace. Their entry into the competition is called the Light Towed Howitzer (LTH — this gun has also been called the LTH-39). The LTH is more conventional-looking than the VSEL model but is just as capable. Able to hurl 155mm shells ranges similar to those of the UFH, the LTH is just slightly heavier than the VSEL competitor at almost exactly 9,000 lb/4,082 kg. The LTH-39 is also capable of firing four rpm in a maximum-speed burst or two rpm in sustained fire, as well as being transported by the same vehicles and aircraft. While both guns have a different design philosophy, they were both designed with one purpose in mind: to win the U.S. Army/Marine Corps lightweight 155mm gun competition. The winning decision has yet to be made, but both systems have been undergoing rigorous testing, and you can bet that whatever gun the military chooses, it will dramatically add to the punching power of the XVIII Airborne Corps well into the 21st century.