Since the above was written, Professor Fuks has, to my great sorrow, joined those who can no longer read these lines.
On the geography of Cyrenaica, G. Narducci, SCC, 1942; R. Horn, Die Antike, 19, 1943, pp. 163 sqq.; E. Evans Pritchard, BMA 7, 1943, Cyrenaican Tribes = idem, The Sanusi of Cyrenaica, 1949, pp. 29 sqq.; H. W. Ahlmann, La Libia Setlentrionale, 1930; El 10, 1931, pp. 417 sqq. sv. Cirenaica; M. Cary, The Geographic Background of Greek and Roman History, 1949; F. Chamoux, CMB, 1953, Introduction, pp. 11-17; R. G. Goodchild, Tabula Imperii Romani, Cyrene, 1954; C. B. M. Burney, R. W. Hey. Prehistory and Pleistocene Geology in Cyrenaican Libya, 1955, pp. 5 sqq.; W. B. Fisher, The Middle East, 1956, pp. 485 sqq. For bibliography till 1959, R. W. Hill, A Bibliography of Libya, Univ. of Durham, 1959.
Cf. E. Kirsten, Die griechische Polis als historisch-geographisches Problem des Mittelmeeres, 1956, pp. 70 sqq.; H. Bengtson, Griechische Geschichte, I, 1960; pp. 86 sqq.
But in the second century of the current era, after the Jewish rebellion, part of the country’s eastern territory was transferred to Egypt, apparently for economic reasons.
G. D. B. Jones, J. H. Little, JRS 61, 1971, pp. 64 sqq., Coastal settlements of Cyrenaica.
For the geology of Cyrenaica, F. Mühlhofer, Speleologica Cirenaica, 1928; E. Pantanelli, RIC, 1940; Burney, Hey, n. 1.
Burney, Hey, op. cit., pp. 7-8.
E. C. Semple, The Geography of the Mediterranean Region, 1932, p. 91; Cf. Theophrastus, HP IV, 3, 7; VIII, 6, 6.
BMA VII, Cyrenaican Tribes, p. 7.
On these conjectures and their sources, CMB, pp. 69 sqq.
Etruskische Frühgeschichte, 1929, p. 13; cf. H. L. Lorimer, Homer and the Monuments, 1950, p. 88.
QAL 5, 1967, pp. 19 sqq.
BSA 63, 1968, pp. 41 sqq.
Stucchi, Cirene 1957-1966, 1967, pp. 150 sqq; Boardman, Hayes, BSA Supp. 4, 1966; BSA 61, pp. 149-150.
Information from M. Vickers — JHS Arch. Reports, 1971-2 (1972), p. 41; Boardman, BSA 61, 1966, p. 152.
Goodchild, Kyrene und Apollonia, 1971, pp. 177 sqq.; Boardman, BSA 1966, p. 152.
O. Bates, The Eastern Libyans, 1914, p. 101, n. 5.
AI I, 1927, p. 151.
BSA 63, 1968, loc. cit.
H. Schafer, RM², 95, 1952, pp. 142-3.
SEG 9, 3; S. Ferri, ABA 1925, no. 5, pp. 19-24; A. Ferrabino, RF, 1928, pp. 222 sqq.; CMB 105 sqq.; A. J. Graham, JHS 80, 1960, pp. 94 sqq.; I., H. Jeffery, Ha, 10, 1961, pp. 139 sqq.
The place has not been identified with certainty. Till a few years ago it was generally thought to be the island of Bomba off the east coast of Cyrenaica; Goodchild (Tabula Imperii Romani, Cyrene, 1954), places it at the island of Jeziret al-Merakhev, near ‛Ein el-Gazalah, but with the addition of a question-mark. Cf. Goodchild, op. cit., p. 11.
For the place’s identification and its description, The Times, Dec. 1st, 195C pp. 7- 10.
CMB 102; V. Berard, Les Phéniciens et VOdyseé, I, 1902-3, p. 415; J. Myres, Geographical History in Greek Lands, 1953, p. 286.
The basic problems were considered by J. Thrige, RC 1828, paras. 22-24 (ed. Ferri, 1940); for a survey and summing up of the views of various scholars, CMB, pp. 70 sqq.; 121 sqq.; cf. K. Beloch, Griechische Geschichte, I² 2, 1913., pp. 236 sq.
RC, p. 101; Beloch, op. cit., pp. 236, 483, n. 3.
C. Blinkenberg, Die Lindische Tempelchronik, 1915, pp. 18, 20; xvii, 109-116; Lindos, II, Inscr., I, 1941, pp. 149 sqq.
Herod. IV, 152, 3.
Boardman, BSA 61, 1966, p. 153, who dates c. 620 B.C.
The sherd was dated by B. Shefton.
Stuce M, Cirene, pp. 150 sqq.
Loc. cit.
Ibid.
As noted by Parke, DO p. 78, the Greek cities which consulted the Delphic oracle during the 7th century were Paros, Thera and Rhodes.
Cf. Herod. IV, 158, 3.
Pind., IV Pyth., 14.
CMB 126, p. 127.
Dioscorides, Materiamedica, II, 169; Callira., Apoll. II, 88.
Find., IX Pyth, 69.
Finds of archaic pottery have been made in the area of the Acropolis; I owe this information to the late Professor Allan Wace.
Pind., IX Pyth., no (192); Callim. ad Apoll., 85-7; SEG 9, 1, line 3.
Eg. DO p. 74.
Diod. VIII, 29; Pind. V Pyth., 87; SEG 9, 189.
Cf. the Egyptian word for the Pharaoh of Lower Egypt — “Bith” (CMB, p. 93).
CMB, pp. 93 sqq. (Herod. IV, 155).
RM, 95, 1952, pp. 150-1.
Herod. IV, 170.
The struggle of Heracles with Antaeus (Pind. Isthm., II, 70) and the service of Chionis under Battus I (Paus. III, 14, 3).
SEG 9, 72, line 23; RFC 1928, p. 282.
Pind., V Pyth., 120; cf. SEG 9, 189.
Stucchi, Cirene, p. 50.
Goodchild, Kyr. u. Apoll., p. 163; Stucchi, Cirene, p. 28.
Callim., Apoll., 77: μάλα καλόν ἀνάκτορον.
L. Pernier, TA, 1935, p. 23.
ΤΑ, pp. 132-4.
AI IV, 1931, pp. 178 sqq.
Pind., Pyth., V, 121-4 (90-93).
ASAA 39-40, 1963, p. 661.
Loc. cit. (n. 42).
Find., V Pyth., 130 (97).
For another view, Stucchi, ASA A, 39-40, p. 661.
Herod. IV, 159, 1.
Herod. IV, 159. The slogan finds authority, as Professor D. Asheri has pointed out to me, in the Stele of the Founders, (SEG 9, 3) which promises the settlers from Thera “citizenship, political office and ownerless land.”
E. S. G. Robinson, BMC, 1927, p. xxix.
Stucchi, op. cit., pp. 150 sqq.
Paus. VI, 19, 10. But views on the building’s identity have been divided: Treu, Olympia, III, 23; PW 35, 1939, cols. 124-5, sv. Olympia.
BMC, pp. xxviii-xxix.
On the plant and the problem of its identification, B. Bonacelli, Mini-sterio dei Colonie, Boll, del informazione economico, 1924; E. Strantz, Die Silfionsfrage, 1909; PH² IIIA, 1927, col. 102; Supp. V, 1931, cols. 972 sqq.; BMC, Cyrenaica, p. ccli; W. Capelle, RM, 97, 1954, pp. 169 sqq.; CMB, pp. 246-263; C. L. G. Gemmil, Bull. of the Hist. of Medicine, 40, 1966, pp. 295 sqq. The silphium was a plant which grew wild in most of the country and more especially in its western part. Its sap, which was used both as a condiment and a medicine, and brought high prices in the Greek world, was tapped from the stem before the plant seeded, and this resulted in its death. Its leaves were sought hungrily by sheep. Not all the details transmitted concerning the silphium by ancient works can be reconciled with one another, and the plant’s botanical identity is controversial.
SP 1864, pp. 74-5; H. Weld-Blundell, BSA 1895, p. 122.
Herod. IV, 203, 2.
Herod. IV, 159, 5.
Perip., 108.
RC, para. 31, p. 135; Wilamovitz-Moellendorf, Cirene, 1930, p. 13; Macan, Herodotus, Vol. II, Appendix xii, p. 272.
Herod. II, 182, 1.
TA 96; AI IV, 195.
NC 1899, pp. 283, 287; S. P. Noe, Bibliography of Greek Coin Hoards,² 1937, nos. 322, 299, 720, 888 etc.
Plut. (Barnadakis) De Mid. virt., 260 sq.; Herod. IV, 160 sq.
Plut., De Mul. virt., 260 sq. (Eryxo).
Schafer, RM 95, 1952, p. 159n.
De Virt. Mul., xxv (260).
Ibid.; ἐπιβουλεύων τῇ τυραννίδι.
Herod. IV, 161, 2.
CMB pp. 140, 221.
Herod. IV, 159, 4 (62); cf. also Jeffery, (Ha. 10, 1961, pp. 139 sqq.) criticizing Chamoux’s opinion. Hammond (Hist. of Greece, 1960, p. 123) thinks that these were Libyans settled on the frontiers of the city territory for peripheral defence, like the perioikoi of Sparta, who were granted secondary citizenship and a measure of internal autonomy.
Schol. ad Arist., Plut., 925; Hesychius sv. Battos.
Illustrations of the kylix are to be found in numerous works: eg. Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum, I, p. 20, pl. 20, 21, no. 189; E. Pfuhl, Masterpieces of Greek Painting and Drawing (tr. Beazley, 1955). fig. Beazley, Ashmole, Greek Sculpture and Painting, 1932, fig. 44 etc.
Lane, BSA, 34, 1933‘4. pp. 161-2.
On the Libyan flocks, Synes., Epp. 148; Pind. IX Pyth., 11 (8); Herod. IV, 155, 3.
See particularly, H. R. W. Smith, University of California Publications, I, 10, 1944. pp. 272 sqq.
Archeology 12, 1959, pp. 179 sqq.: Birds on the cup of Arkesilaus. See now Applebaum, Doron, Katz Festschrift, 1967, pp. 69 sqq. (Hebrew).
Applebaum, ibid., n. 60; on Libyan flocks, n. 58.
On the grains of Cyrene see Pind. III Isth. 72; Theophr. HP VIII, 4, 3; CP III, 21, 2: Diod. III, 49; SEG 9, 2 etc.
For cattle-rearing in the Plain of Barka, Polyb. V, 65-8; Soph. Elec. 727; BMC p. clxvi, no. iA.
PC, para. 5; cf. CERP, pp. 354-5.
HP IV, 3, 1.
Anab., III, 28.
SEG 9, 3: πολίτηίας καὶ τιμᾶμ πεδέχ[εν] καὶ γᾶς ἀδεσπότω ἀπολάγχανεν.
Plut., de mul. virt., (Eryxo), 260 sqq.
Herod. IV, 161.
I am grateful to Professor D. Asheri for drawing my attention to Will’s study of this problem. (REA 59, 1957, pp. sqq.) He interprets Battus II’s division of land as the allotment of areas recently acquired, and not as the reassignment of soil already owned by Greeks (as opposed to the view of G. Thompson, Studies in Ancient Greek Society, I, 1949, pp. 249 sqq.) Will inclines to see the terms used in Herodotus’ account of the reforms of De-monax (loc. cit., n. 6; Herod. IV, 161 — τά ἀλλα πάντα) as applying both to the functions and estates which were taken from the king. (“L’interprétation de ce passage en termes de biens fonciers me parait la plus immediate”).
Thrige, RC, para. 37.
VIII, 30.
Herod. IV, 163.
Herod. II, 154.
Herod. II, 177.
Herod. II, 174.
Herod. II, 178.
BMC, p. xxviii.
De mul. virt., 261 c.
GS I, 176 sq.
See p. 17.
Schafer, RM 1952, p. 105, n. 101.
Herod. IV, 159, 2-3.
Cf. Chamoux’s view, op. cit., pp. 146 sq.; he sees the policy of Arkesilaos III as guided by characteristically tyrannical motives, and ascribes to him the aim of redividing the large estates of the Cyrenean aristocracy among the common people. I personally believe that this intention had already appeared under Arkesilaos II. H. Schafer (RM, 1952, p. 162) attributes to the Battiads a position intermediate between the traditional monarchy and the tyrannical regime, but considers that Plutarch’s account was too much influenced by the conditions of a later period.
Herod. IV, 161.
For various datings of the temple’s erection, see Goodchild, Kyrene und Apollonia, p. 151.
SP, no. 7.
BCH 71-2, 1947, p. 347.
Dinsmoor, The Architecture of Ancient Greece, 1950, p. 86; Cf. Rowe, Buckle, Gray, MUE 1952, 1956, pp. 31-2.
This writer, judging by the proportions of the building’s peristasis, and other details, such as the corner-triglyph contractions, concluded, after personal examination, in favour of the earlier date.
Mitchell, JHS 86, 1966, pp. 99 sqq.
Herod. IV, 162, 2-3.
A Greek inscription apparently from Barka (CIG 5147) lists the descendants through seven generations of Aladdeir son of Battus, (meaning the fourth) the grandson of Arkesilaos. It may be supposed that Arkesilaos’ marriage with a Libyan princess was a move in the policy of appeasement followed by Battus III in pursuance of the reforms of Demonax.
Herod. IV, 165, 7.
For the chronology, Mitchell, (note 112), who points out that as there is no evidence that Arkesilaos fled to Samos in Polykrates’ time, his accession and flight are more probably to be dated about 525.
Libia antiqua, 3/4, 1966, pp. 179 sqq.
Herod. XII, 91, 2-3.
It is difficult to accept Diodorus’ statement (I, 68) that Apries’ attackwas directed against Barka. A settlement may already have existed there, but it would have been entirely composed of Libyans.
BMC, p. clxvi.
Ibid., pp. xlv, clxv.
A. H. M. Jones, CERP, 1937, p. 355.
Eg. Beloch, Griech. Gesch.² I, p. 2; E. Meyer, Gesch. Alterturns4, 1944, p. 151 n.
BMC, p. clxv, n. 1.
Herod. IV, 204.
P. M. Fraser, BSAA, 39, 1951, pp. 137-8.
BMC, pp. xliv-xlv.
Herod. IV, 171.
Schol. Pyth. IV, 26 (Drachmann).
BMC, p. x]v.
Ibid., p. xxxiii.
TA, pp. 55-56.
BMC, pl. ii, 18.
TA, p. 57.
BMC, p. ccxxxiv.
Herod. III, 26, 1; cf. Myres, CAH III, 1929, p. 668.
Schol. IX Pyth., 90b (Drachmann); Paus. IX, 16, 1.
TA, p. 97; AI IV, 191, 200.
F. Heichelheim, WGA, 1938, pp. 297-8.
L. Naville, Les monnaies d’or de la Cyrénaique, 1951, p. 15.
BMC, p. xivi.
CMB, p. 160.
Pind., IV, V Pyth.
Pind., V Pyth., 124 (166).
BMC, p. xliv.
Paus. X, 15, 6.
CMB, p. 199.
IV Pyth., 227, 280.
Theotimus (FHG, IV, 517), Lib. I de Cyrenensibus; ap. schol. Pind., V Pyth., 34 (Drachmann).
Antiq., XXVI, 1952, p. 210, fig. 1.
Schol. Pind. IV, p. 93 (Drachmann).
Heraclides Ponticus, de Repub. Cvrens., 8.
BMC, p. xliii-xlv sqq.
NC6 XV, 1955, p. 150, no. 25.
V Pyth., 109 (146).
IV, 163, 2.
CMB, p. 208.
CMB, pp. 209, 368.
VIII, 29.
DO, pp. 75-6; Studnicza, Kyrene, 1890, p. 98.
RC, para. 44, p. 202.
Diod. XI, 74, 2.
Pind., IV Pyth., 56 (97).
Thuc. I, 110, 1.
CMB, p. 167.
‘King... of great cities’, according to Pind., V Pyth., 15-16 (19-20). But his alleged relations with Athens depend on the restoration of the controversial SEG 2, 170.
Stucchi, Cirene, pp. 47 sqq.
WGA, p. 416.
Loc. cit. (n. 152).
Stucchi, Cirene, pp. 74-5.
For the functions of these magistrates, DAI I, Cir., ii, nos. 15, 16.
See L. Robert, Hellenica, 11-12, 1960, pp. 542 sqq.
Schafer, for example, rejects completely the democratic character of his reforms, thus impugning the authority of Herodotus, whose account he regards as anachronistic.
CMB, pp. 214-5, and references.
Polyaenus, Straleg., VII, 28 — τούς ἄρχοντας... βουλευσαμένους.
BMC, p. x]vi.
Ibid., p. xliii.
Ibid., p. x]vi.
DAI I Cir., ii, p. 20.
But see n. 166.
Thuc. VII, 50, 2.
Herod. IV, 171.
BMC, p. x]v.
Periplous (Muller), 108 fin.
Diod. XIV, 34, 4.
Paus. IV, 26, 2.
Arist., Pol., VI, 4 (1319b).
Plut., adprinc. inerudit., 1; Diog. Laertius, III, 2, who in de vit. philos. III, 6 records that Plato studied under the mathematician Theodorus of Cyrene, apparently in 396 BC (PW² V. 1934. sv. Theodorus (30)).
SEG 9, 3; RFC 1928, pp. 222 sqq.
G. von Brauschitsch, Die Panathenaischen Preisamforen, 1910, pp. 158 sqq.; E. Breccia, Iscriz. Greci e Latini, 1911, pp. xviii sqq.
Thuc. II, 48.
BMC, p. lxix.
Diodorus (X, 4, 1) relates that Clinias, a citizen of Tarentum, a Pythagorean and friend of Plato, travelled to Cyrene to aid one Pheroras, having heard that this man, also a Pythagorean, had lost his entire property “owing to a revolution in the state” (διὰ τινα πολιτικὴν περίστασιν). A terminus post quern for this event is probably the year 387, when Plato visited Sicily and formed ties with the Pythagorean group at Tarentum.
Pol. VI, 4 (1319b).
Wade Gery, The Class. Quarterly, 27, 1933, pp. 25-7.
The Politics of Artistotle, 1902, III, p. 522.
Essays in Greek History, 1958, p. 150.
XXI, 6.
Metropolis und Apoikie, 1963, p. 20.
SEG 9, 72, line 134.
For a suggestion as to their composition in the time of Demonax, Jeffery, Ha 10, pp. 139 sqq.
A. Ferrabino, RFC, 1928, p. 226.
Op. cit., p. 20.
SEG 9, 1, paras 2, 4.
CERP, p. 357.
DAI II, Cir. i, p. 83 and line 132.
G. Oliverio, Documenti di Cirene antica, 1926, pp. 224 sqq., line 16.
IG 12, (3), 1898, 450, line 18.
PW 9, 1913, sv. ’Εταιρία, col. 1373.
This unit was also a feature of the constitution of Megalopolis (IGN V (2), 495) founded in 368, not long after the inauguration of Cyrene’s Cleisthenic regime.
V. Ehrenberg, Der Staat der Griechen, I, 1957, p. 9. For a bibliography of the hetaireai, Siebert, Metropolis undApoikie, 1963, p. 20.
The name hetairea does not fit this function, but the geographical division of Cyrenaica is appropriate to such a partition; I do not refer here to the triple division into plateau, steppe and desert, since there is no evidence exactly when Greek settlement reached the edge of the desert. The suggestion concerns a division within the regions of primary settlement, and is of course tentative; there is no specific evidence.
DAI II, Cir., ii, p. 160, no. 141.
SEG 9, 1, para. 5; para 11, line 82.
ASAA 39-40, p. 273, no. 103, pp. 8-12.
Yet see the edict of Ptolemy X Soter II to Cyrene (DAI Cir. ii, no. 538), whose formula suggests that the Demiurgi were the city’s leading magistrates.
P. M. Fraser, BSAA 39, 1951, pp. 132 sqq.
Loc. cit., p. 137.
Theoph., Frag. (ap. Phot., 176), in.
SEG 9, 77. The editors of SEG date this inscription in the 3rd century B.C.; I permit myself to disagree, since the letters are characteristic of the 4th century at Cyrene, and Menesarchos, son of Theochrestos, one of the strategoi of the inscription, had a son, Theochrestos son of Menesarchos, who was buried near the city at the end of the century (SEG 9, 228). Even had he not died relatively young, Menesarches could hardly have been at his acme later than the middle of the 4th century.
TA pp. 40 sqq.: AI III, 1930, pp. 203-4.
One of the three commanders, Aristophanes son of Parabaitas, is recorded with Philon son of Annakeris and three other citizens — magistrates of the polis according to the constitution of Ptolemy Lagos — on CIG 4833 = SP pl. 178, no. 9. The latter belongs to the last thirty years of the 4th century, while the wall contemporary with the Strategeion was repaired not later than the end of the century. The building is therefore to be dated between 340 and 310 approximately.
J. Bousquet, Le trésor de Cyrene; Fouilles de Delphes, II, Topographie et Architecture, 2v., 1952, p. 88; cf. Mnemosyne, 6, 1953, pp. 242-243.
Stucchi, Cirene, p. 41
In Cyrenaican Expedn. of the Univ. of Manchester, 1952, 1956, p. 37.
Expressed in the first (Hebrew) version of the present work, p. 36.
Op. cit., p. 41.
Stucchi, ibid., pp. 54-5; L’agora di Cirene, 1965, pp. 139 sqq.
Cirene, pp. 62 sqq.; L’agora, pp. 120-137.
TA p. 69; AI I, 1927, p. 150.
TA p. 64.
TA p. 47.
G. Anti, Edifici treatrali arcaici, 1947, p. 122 sqq.
BMC, pp. lxxx, ccxxxix; pl. xiii, 13.
E. Parabeni, Catalogo delle Sculture di Cirene, 1959, no. 182, Tav. 104-5; AI I, pp. 3 sqq.; Dedalo 7, Oct., 1926, pp. 273 sqq.
The evidence is against their being the names of the city-magistrates; see BMC, p. ccxxxi.
BMC p. clxxxi.
BMC, p. lxxix.
A Ferrabino, RFC, 1928, pp. 250 sqq.
His view is doubted by A. J. Graham (JHS 80, 1960, p. 100).
Jug., 79.
Val. Maximus, V, 6, 4.
I, 38.
Mela, I.e.
ad Aen., IV, 42.
For historical sources, see C. Perroud, De Syrticis Emporiis, 1881.
Theoph., Frag., II, 3, who refers to the precious stones imported from Carthage.
Perroud, op. cit., p. 96.
RC, para. 84, pp. 378 sqq.
Aurigemma, AI 7, 1940, pp. 67 sqq.; J. Desanges, Latomus, 23, 1964, p. 713.
T. Frank, ESAR, IV, 1938, p. 62.
The Geographical Background of Greek and Roman History, 1949, p 218.
GJ 118, 1952, p. 151.
Ibid., n. 3.
Prehistory and Pleistocene Geology in Cyrenaican Libya, 1955, pp. 7-8.
JRS 61, 1971, p. 64.
IV, 182.
II 32
Rhys Carpenter, AJA 60, 1956, p. 231.
Carpenter, ibid.
Herod. V, 42.
The appearance of gold coins in the Cyrenean economy cannot be explained by Persian gold delivered for political motives, since the latter came in the form of ready-minted coin. An Egyptian source evokes the question, why did it begin to arrive only in the 5th century, when Cyrene had maintained close contacts with Egypt since the 6th?
BMC p. xcvi.
A find shedding light on trade between the Syrtic shore and the Sahara are the obsidian blades found in a mausoleum near Germa (Fezzan) by the Italian expedition of 1933. Obsidian is to be obtained from Pantalleria, Lipari and Santorin (Thera). See R. E. M. Wheeler, Rome Beyond the Imperial Frontier, 1955, p. 127.
Goodchild (GJ 118, 1953, p. 118. cf. Antiq. 25, 1951, pp. 141-4), observed that the concentration of fortified farms south of Bengazi and around Ajedabia made it clear that the main danger came from that direction. Although he was referring to the Roman period, it may be assumed that the situation was much the same in the 5th century B.C.
Perip., 109.
G. Meltzer, Geschichte der Karthager, 1879, I, p. 188; S. Gsell, Hist. ancienne de l‘Afrique du Nord, I, 1920, p. 451.
SEG 9, 77. Cf. here pp. 40-1.
AI III, pp. 182-31; SEG 9, 49.
ΑΠΙΣΕΙ. Tod proposed to emend ἐπὶ πᾶσᾳ μάχη (AJA 42, 1938, p. 231, fig. 5), but the error implied seems to me to be too glaring.
These two tribes fought for Carthage at Zama in the year 202 B.C.
East of Euesperitae a tombstone has been found decorated with a painted relief, whose subject expresses, in Ghislanzoni s view (DAI I, Cir., ii, pp. 99 sqq.), patriotism for the region, a situation of warfare, and a connection with the Syrtis. I believe the stone to date from the second half of the 4th century B.C.
SEG 9, 1.
Ibid., para. 6, 1, 37.
Polit. VI, 4 (1319b).
Diod. XVII, 49, 2.
Arrian, VII, 9, 6.
Curtius, IV, 8, 21.
Diod., XVIII, 19-20; Arrian ap. Phot., 92 (Roos, I, 16-17).
Diod. XVII, 108, 8; XVIII, 19, 20-21; Arr. ap. Phot., 9, 2 (Roos I, 19); Strabo XVII, 3 (826); Justin, XIII, 6; Oros. III, 23. Scholars believe that a Cyrenean inscription (DAI II, Cir., i, no. 59; SEG 9, 76) belongs to this war; it commemorates the dedication of a tithe of enemy ships captured off Cheronnesos in the east of the country, and near Euesperitae.
Diod., XVIII, 21, 9.
Diod., XIX, 79
A different opinion is expressed by Svoronos, Περιγραφὴ τῶν νομισμάτων τῶν Πτολεμαίων, 1907, I, ρ. 66.
Plut., Demet., 14; Justin XXII, η.
BMC, pp. lxxxvi-lxxxvii.
Cf. V. Ehrenberg, RFC² 16,1939, pp. 144 sqq.; Oros. IV, 6; Diod., XX, 40-41.
The date is unclear: according to Pausanias (I, 6, 8) in 301. Jones (CERP, p. 358) thought that Ptolemy returned in 308, but that in 301, following a fresh rising, he was forced to reconquer the country.
Oliverio, Beloch, De Sanctis, Luzzatto.
Reinach, Cary, Jones, Bengtson.
Heuss, Taeger, Ehrenberg.
Heichelheim.
H. Bengtson, Die Strategie in der hellenistischen Zeit, III, 1952, p. 159, n. 1.
SEG 9, 1, para. 4, 29-30.
Bengtson, op. cit., p. 160.
See here, below, pp. 187 sqq.
On their duties, Cary, JHS 1928, p. 232.
Tod has calculated (CAH V, 1953, p. 22) that 120 drachmae were sufficient to support a bachelor. The daily wage of a building worker at the end of the 5th century in Athens was one drachma (IG I, 373-4— ibid. pp. 24-5).
This is clear from a comparison of the prices recorded by the Demiurgi Steles and those known in Greece and the islands in the same period; see DAI I, Cir. ii, 1933, Oliverio, I conti dei Demiurgi — SEG 9, 11-44; ASAA 39-40, 1963, p. 280, no. 104; and see here Chap. III.
SEG 9, 1, para. 7.
SEG 9, 1, para. 8.
SEG 9, 1, 4.
I refer to the close resemblance of the head of the goddess Libya on coins to that of the Ptolemaic queen; compare the well-known head of Berenice II, with a Libyan coiffure, from Alexandria (Breccia, Alexandrea ad Aegyptum, 1914, p. 197, fig. 168) — though it has recently been claimed that the coiffure is a recent addition — and further the allusions of the poet Callimachus to the Libyan wives of the Theran settlers (Apoll., 87).
Para 1, 9-10.
Ibid., Para. 11. This paragraph, much of which has been defaced, deals apparently with the assessment and restoration of lost property after political disorders. Cf. 11,6, which refers to burnt fields.
Para. 1, 9-10.
Para. 11, 72-3.
Para. 6, 39-41.
F. Heichelheim, ABP, Klio Beih. 18, 5, 1925, pp. 43-6.
Heichelheim, op. cit., pp. 45 sqq.
Ibid., p. 45.
Paus. I, 7; Athen., XII, 74; Justin XXVI, 3. For a detailed discussion of the date, PW 17, 1928, col. 293 sqq. (Geyer), sv. Magas; cf. Chamoux, Rev. hist., 216, 1956, p. 21.
Paus. I, 7.
Polyaenus, II, 28.
Paus., loc. cit.
Justin, XXVI, 3.
Agatharchides ap. Athen., XII, 74.
Ibid.
Plut., Demetrius, 53, 4; Prolog. Trogi, 26; Justin, XXVI, 31 (252); Paus. I, 7.
Catul., de coma Beren. (Carm. LXVI), 25-8; Justin, loc. cit.
OGIS 54, 6-7.
BMC, p. clii.
SEG 9, 112.
F. Chamoux, BCH 82, 1958, pp. 571 sqq.
M. Guarducci, Inscriptiones Creticae, XVII, 1935, (1), 6.
Hultsch, Corpus Inscr. Indicarum, I, 1925, p. 25; Gercke, RM 42, 1887, p. 266; R. Thapar, Asoka and the Decline of the Mauryas, 1963, p. 41.
Naville, Les monnaies d’or, pp. 66 sq.; cf. Chamoux, loc. cit. (n. 34), pp. 29 sqq.
J. Macliu, RM 205, 1951, p. 47.
Perhaps the commander of the garrison, as Bengtson suggests in Die Strategie, p. 162.
DAI II, Cir. ii, pp. 259 sqq. = SEG 9, 5, line 70; cf. Bengtson, ibid., p. 164.
SEG 9, 1, 3-4.
Plut., Philopoem., I, 3; Polyb., X, 22, 3.
BMC, pp. cli; cxxxiv-cxxxvii.
The idea is supported eg. by Robinson (ibid.) and Jones (CERP, p. 359) i it is opposed by Machu (loc. cit., p. 50).
The opinion of Droysden, Reinach, Tarn and Oliverio.
Polyb. XXXI, 18, 6; Bengtson, Die Strateg., p. 164.
Bengtson, op. cit., p. 158; SEG 9, 55.
Bengtson, op. cit., pp. 153-4.
DAI I, Cir, i, p. 42, line 20 (SEG 9, 7).
Polyb. XV, 25, 12: Λιβυάρχης τῶν κατὰ Κυρήνην τόπων; Bengtson, op. cit., p. 157.
Strabo XVII, 3 (836): “It was the frontier of Cyrene in the time of Ptolemy Lagos.”
See pp. 130-1.
Eg. S. P. Noe, Bibliography of Greek Coin Hoards, 1937, p. 296, no. 1129; p. 298, no. 1136.
I owe this information to Professor P. Romanelli. A Greek inscription set up by Cyreneans at Marsa Delah east of Sabrata (J. B. Reynolds, J. B. Ward-Perkins, Inscriptions of Roman Tripoli, 1952, no. 848), belongs, apparently, to the 1st century B.C.
BMC, p. cxxxii.
The economic value of the Syrtis was no doubt enhanced by its deposits of sulphur (G. Narducci, SCC, p. 92) — which was prized in ancient times particularly as a fertilizer of vineyards — cf. Rostovtzeff, SEHHIV p. 396.
BMC, pl. xxx, 7.
Ibid., pl. xxx, 8, 9.
BMC., pl. xxix, 12.
BMC, p. cc.
Perip., 108; JRS 61, 1971, p. 74.
Archaeology, 19, 1966, pp. 56-7; 1967, pp. 219-220; AJA 70, 1966, pp. 259-263; 71, 1967, pp. 141-147; Goodchild, Kyrene u. Apoll., p. 191; Lauer, Rev. arch., 1963, pp. 129 sqq.
Similar plans are to be seen at Megalopolis (DS, sv., Porta, IV, fig. 5671), Mantinea (ib. fig. 5672), Sidé (Jb DAI, 71, 1956, p. 678, Abb. 22, 27) and Perge, Pamphylia (CAA, 102-3, Abb. 53).
Eg. Jones, CERP, p. 359.
Strabo, XVII, 837. Chamoux, Rev. hist., 216, p. 24, notes that the city’s name is absent from the Delphic theoric list of the 2nd century B.C., whereas that of Cyrene appears.
DAT I, Cir. i, p. 69, nos. 4, 5.
An analogy from this point of view is the northern area of Priene, rebuilt in the middle of the 4th century B.C.
BMC, p. clix.
Guarducci, Insert. Cret. XVII, 1, no. 6.
This was indicated by air-photographs (Goodchild, Antiq., 26, 1952, p. 210) and also by archaeological trial-trenches. (Ibid.).
Goodchild, loc. cit.
Libia Antica, 2, 1965, pp. 91-100.
BMC, pl. xxxviii, 20-21.
E. Breccia, Iscrizione greche e latini, 1911, no. 284.
Antiq., loc. cit.
Strabo, XVII, 3, 20, (836).
SEG 1, 1, para. 1.
Polyb. XXXI, 18, 9.
Plut., de virt. mul., (Arat.)
Strabo ap. Jos., Ant. 14, 2, 7, 115.
Polyb. V, 65.
Polyb. XXXI, 18, 9.
Polyb. XXXI, 18, 7.
Strabo XVII, 3, 15 (833).
SEG 9, 5; DAI II Cir. ii, pp. 259 sq., no. 538.
Polyb. XXXI, 10; Liv. Epit. XLVI; Prolog. Trogini ad 34.
Polyaenus VIII, 72; Polyb. XXXI, 26 (18). The course of events is unclear, and the conjecture that they ended with a compromise between the king and the Cyreneans arises from the fact that despite the latter’s energetic resistance Euergetes was able to renew his campaign in Cyprus soon afterwards.
Liv., Epit., XLVII; Polyb. XXXIX, 7 (XL, 12); Diod., frag. XXXI.
SEG 9, 7; DAT I, Cir. i, pp. 11 sqq.
Jos., C. Ap., II, 5; Justin XXXVIII, 8.
Justin, XXXIX, 5; App., Bell. Mithr., 121 (600).
Liv., Epit., LXXXI; Tac. Ann., XIV, 18; App. Bell. Mithr., 121 (600); B. Civ., I, hi; Jul. Obseq., de prodigiis, 49; Eutrop., VI, 11; RC, para. 68, pp. 300 sqq. for differences on the exact date of his death.
Liv., Epit., LXX.
Tac., Ann., XIV, 18, 2; App. S. Mithr., 121; B. Civ., I, 111.
Cf. P. Romanelli, CR, pp. 35, 43.
Thus also Jones in Anatolian Studies presented to W. H. Buckler, 1939, pp. 111-112. Cf. J. Colin, Les villes libres de l’orient gréco-romain, et l’envoi au supplice par acclamations populaires (Collection Latomus, 82), 1965. p. 77.
S. I. Oost, Cl. Phil., 58, 1965, p. 15: Cyrene 96-74 BC.
Plut., De virtut. mul., XIX (Arat.), 255; Polyaen. VIII, 38.
SEHHW, pp. 876-7.
SEG 9, 63; DAI II Cir., i, no. 67.
De virt. mul., XXV: ἦν δὲ θυγάτηρ... γνωρίμων ἀνδρῶν... ἠξιοῦν δὲ τὴν Ἀρατάφιλαν συνάρχειν καὶ συνδιοικειν τοῖς ἀρίστοις ἀνδράσι την πολιτείαν.
On the nomophylakes RL VI, x, pp. 414 sqq; pp.97, 1964, pp. 291-303; see also Pugliesi-Cartarelli, QAL 4, 1961, p. 16; no. 2.
Strabo ap. Jos., Ant. 14, 2, 7, 115.
Plut., Luc., 2.
Ant. 16, 6, 169.
Yet see CIG 5186 from Ptolemais — δῆμος Πτολεμαίεων.
Plut. Luc., 2.
Ant. 14, 7, 114.
Ant., 16, 6, 169.
Reynolds, JRS 52, 1962, pp. 97 sqq.; PW 7, 1900, col. 1390, no. 231.
Reynolds, loc. cit., p. 98, no. 4.
Plin., HN, 19, 3 (15).
Oost, Cl. Phil. 58, 1965, p. 19; Badian, JRS 55, 1965, pp. 119 sqq.
See generally CAH ii, 1956, pp. 659 sq.; CR p. 50; Cyrene is mentioned as united with Crete for the first time by Cicero, Pro Plancio, 63, cf. 85; for the numismatic evidence, BMC, pp. ccvii sq.
Eg. Jones, Anal. Stud. pres. Buckler, p. nr.
SEG 9, 631; OGIS II, 767.
Reynolds, loc, cit., pp. 97 sqq.
Ibid., p. 98, no. 4.
Ibid., pp. 99-100, no. 7.
Strabo VIII, 7, 5 (388); XIV, 3, 3 (665); Plut., Pomp., 28, 3-4; App. B. Mithr., XIV, 96; Serv. ad Virg., Georg., IV, 127. The inscription indicates that the people concerned were settled on plots of state land divided by limitatio (centuriation), and abandoned by their previous occupants.
Reynolds, loc. cit., p. 99, no. 6; AIII, pp. 112, 142-3.
Reynolds, loc. cit., p. 99, no. 5.
SEG 9, 56.
G. Pesce, Il Palazzo delle Colonne a Tolemaide di Cirenaica, 1950, pp. 92 sqq.
BMC, pp. ccvi, ccxxii.
CIG III, 5216.
SEG 9, 8, para. 2, 42-3; Anderson, JRS 17, 1927, p. 39.
DAI II, Cir. ii, p. 482.
SEG 9, 163; SGDI 4848; CIG 5139; SEG 9, 164.
Lucan, Phars. IX, 297-8; Cf. Plut., Cato, 56.
Strabo XVII, 3, 20 (836); Lucan, Phars. IX, 524.
Alfoldi ap. Mélanges d’archéologie, d’epigraphie et d’histoire offerts a J. Carcopino, 1966, pp. 25 sqq.
Αρρ., B. Civ., III, 8.
Cf. Monum. Ancyr., V, 31-2; Plut. Ant., 54.
Dio, LIII, 12, 4 (27 B.C.): “Crete with that part of Libya around Cyrene.”
Plin., HN, V, 5, 36.
Floras, II, 71; CAH XI, 1936, pp. 667-668.
Strabo XVII, 3, 23 (838); Plin. HN, V, 5, 33; Ps.-Scylax, 108.
SEG 9, 63, the inscription of Lucius Orbius, testifying to the rôle of the High Priest Pausanias in the campaign. See CR, p. 77 for the possibility that Quirinius’ campaign was conducted in the year 6 B.C.
Hommages a Marcel Renard, II (Coll. Latomus), 1969, pp. 197-213.
Plin., HNV, 4, 28; 5, 38; A. Riese, Geog. minores, 13, 19.
S. Gsell, Hist. Afr. Nord, VIII, p. 165, n. 1.
Dio LV, 10a, 1; Desanges, Hommages... Renard (n. 429), 204.
SEG 9, 8, where the relevant literature down to 1944 will be found. The principal discussions are: G. Oliverio, NAMC IV, 1927, pp. 13 sqq; Arangio-Ruiz, RFC 56, 1928, pp. 321 sqq.; J. G. Anderson, JRS 17, 1927, pp. 33 sqq.; J. Stroux, L. Wenger, Abh. Bayr. Ah. 34, 1928, Die August-Inschrift auf den Markiplatz von Kyrene; F. de Visscher, Les édits d’Auguste découvertes a Cyréne, 1940. See now also Oliver, Hesperia, 29, 1960, pp. 324 sqq.; cf. AE 1961, p. 176; Bull. Épig. 1961, p. 262, no. 841; K. M. T. Atkinson, in Ancient Society and Institutions: Studies presented to Victor Ehrenberg, 1966, p. 24.
Ptolemais, DAI II, Cir. 11, no. 508, recording the repair of valvae and hydrogogiae in the early Roman period. The city had a complete system of earthenware pipes supplying water to its houses. The great cisterns under the Agora seem to have been built in the hellenistic period, but the vaulting was renewed under Roman rule (G. Caputo, L’Illustrazione Italiana, Jan. 5th, 1936).
CIL III, 12.
PBSR 26, 1958, pp. 160-1.
Stucchi, Cirene, pp. 96 sqq.; Goodchild, Kyrene u. Apollonia, p. 71.
AA 1938, p. 730.
SEG 9, 127.
Stucchi, Cirene, pp. 65 sqq.
DAI I, Cir. ii, no. 49.
JRS 49, 1959, pp. 98-9; cf. QAL 4, 1961, p. 86.
SEG 9, 8, para. 3.
AI III, pp. 198-201. Reynolds (JRS 49, 1959, p. 97) ascribes the grant of civitas to Claudius. The identity of the emperor portrayed by the statue in the Strategeion has recently been questioned.
On the grant of civitas to inhabitants of Cyrene, see Reynolds, loc. cit.
CIG III, 5362.
SB no. 5904.
HN IV, 5, 10.
PBSA 18, 1959, pp. 83-91.
SEG 9,4.
SEG 9, 75.
SEG 9, 101.
SEG 9, 171.
SEG 9, 174-5.
SEG 9, 96.
Suet. Vesp., 2.
CIG III, 5154 c.
Reynolds, JRS 49, 1959, pp. 96 sqq.; SP, p. 115, no. 24.
Tac., Hist., IV, 45.460
Tac., Ann, III, 70.
Ibid. XIV, 18.
E. de Ruggiero, Dizionario epig., II², 1910, p. 1435, sv. Cyrenae; cf. Tac., Ann., XV, 20.
DAI Cir., ii, 271 (Augustan); SEG 9, 184, 6-8 (Flavian).
For this chapter, end-maps 1-4 should be consulted.
J. W. Gregory, Jewish Territorial Organization, Report on Jewish Settlement in Cyrenaica, 1909, p. 7.
Herod. IV, 158, 3. Theophrastus, after describing the increase of trees and the growth of their bark as a result of heavier rainfall, “as in Cyrene”, writes: (HP III, 1, 6): ‘Thus woodland grew where there had been none before: and it is said that the silphium also, previously non-existent, appeared for the same reason’. This observation, cited from a Cyrenean tradition, is connected with the tradition that the silphium originated in the country seven years before the city was founded by the Greeks (Theophrastus, HP VI, 3, 3). Theophrastus seems to have based his observations on a personal visit to Cyrene, according to the convincing arguments of W. Capelle (PM² 97, 1954, pp. 169 sqq.). Theophrastus’ evidence conceining the silphium suggests the possibility that the Greek settlement took place during a time of climatic change in the direction of increased precipitation. Cf. Herodotus’report (IV, 150) that the Theran emigration was preceded by seven years’ drought in the island — a southward shift of the winter rain-bearing winds is a possible explanation. A climatic change in the direction of greater rainfall and lower temperatures in the 8th-7th centuries B.C. in areas as far apart as America, the eastern Mediterranean, Europe and India, now seems certain in the light of palaeobotanical and archaeological evidence summarized by W. Wendland and R. A. Bryson, Quaternary Research, 4, 1974, pp. 9-24: Dating climatic episodes of the Holocene.
The International Bank of Reconstruction and Development, The Economic Development of Libya, 1960, p. 111.
BMA 11, p. 8, n. 4.
Op. cit., p. 6, n. 1.
Int. Bank. Rec. and Dev., Ec. Dev. Lib., 1960, p. 109.
W. B. Fisher, GJ 119, 1953, p. 189.
B. A. Keen, Middle East Supply Centre: The Agricultural Development of the Middle East, 1946, p. 11.
Epp., 114.
In Pap. Vaticanus 11 (Norsa and Vitelli), a survey of landed property in eastern Cyrenaica, carried out under the Severan dynasty, fields whose soil has been swept away (ἐξεσυρμένη) by runoff are recorded in two localities (VIII, 2214; VII, 4718).
Ec. Dev. Lib., pp. 127-8; cf. Vita-Finzi, Wilmott, Clarke, Field Studies in Libya, 1960, pp. 46 sqq. for alluvial erosion in the Wadi Lebda (Tripoli-tania) after the Byzantine period.
Edrisi, trans. R. Dozy, M. J. de Goeje, Description de l’Afrique et de l’Espagne, 1866, p. 162.
Op.cit., (n. 1), 19.
Bonacelli, AC 16, 1922, pp. 386 sqq.; E. C. Semple, The Geography of the Mediterranean Region, 1932, pp. 99 sqq.
HN V, 5 (33)
Plin., HN XIII, 16; Theoph., HP V, 3.
Athen., V, 38 (205); Paus. VIII, 17, 2; Strabo, IV, 6, 2 (202); Plin., HN., XIII, 30 (100).
HP IV, 3, 1, 17; cf. n. 2.
SEG 9, 72; DAI II, Cir. ii, no. 57.
The ancient oil-presses are especially numerous to east of Cyrene, and a remarkable concentration exists at Lamluda.
See n. 24.
The ancient sources on the livestock of the Libyans are collected by O. Bates, The Eastern Libyans, 1914, pp. 91-100.
Strabo, XVII, 3 (837): εἰσὶ δὲ νόμαδες; Herod. IV, 199; Diod. III, 49, 2.
The camel appears in Libya only in the hellenistic period — see M. Schnebel, Die Landwirtschaft im hellenistischen Ägypten, 1925, pp. 332-4.
RIC, 1940.
Herod. IV, 157.
Goodchild, GJ 118, 1952, p. 149.
A Fantoli, RIC, Oct. 1933, pp. 780 sqq.; F. Muhlhofer, Spelealogica Cirenaica, 1928; EI 10, 1931, sv. Cirenaica, pp. 417 sq.; E. Pantanelii, RIC, 1940; F. Franchi, La Cirenaica dal punto di vista zooeconomico e zootechnico.
Coster ap. Coleman-Norton (ed.), Studies in Roman Economic and Social History in Honour of Allen Chester Johnson, 1951, pp. 3 sqq.; 8, n. 3. Pentanelli (op. cit., p. 12) believed that the fringe of the southern belt was a fortified frontier in the Roman period, but archaeological reconnaissance conducted subsequently has not confirmed his conjecture.
Thera, for instance, already possessed a reputation for its wine. — Glotz, Ancient Greece at Work, 1926, p. 25.
G. Piani, La Valorizazzione dei Colonie, 1933, pp. 173-4.
Pind., IV Pyth., 6 (10).
Pind., IX Pyth., 58 (101).
Callim., Apoll., 65.
Strabo, XVII, 3, 21, (837).
III, 50, 1.
Loc. cit.
Plin., HN XVIII, 21; Strabo, II, 5, 33, (131): XVI, 3, 21 (837).
Herod. IV, 155.
Horn., Od., IV, 85-9; cf. Pind., IX Pyth., 6.
Arrian, Ind., 43, 13.
Herod. IV, 186.
Ap. Athen. I, 49, 10.
Strabo XVII, 3, 21 (837); Pind. IV Pyth. 2.
Pind., IX Pyth.. 4.
Strabo XVII, 3, 21 (837).
Priscian, Perieg., 197.
Oppian, Cyneg., II, 253.
Arrian, Ind., 43, 13.
Pind., IX Pyth., 55 (95).
Bates, op. cit.. p. 95.
Ibid., p. 96.
Od., IV, 85-9.
Herod. IV, 170.
Bates, op. cit., p. 146.
Schol. Aristoph., Plut., 925 and other sources.
BMC, p. xxx. The nature of the plant, see Chap. II, n. 59.
IV, 169.
HP VI, 3, 3.
Theoph., HP VI 3, 3.
HP IX, 1, 7.
CERP, p. 356.
Plin., HN XIX, 15 (43).
Pind., IV Isthm., (3), 54.
IV, 198, 3.
Herod., III, 91, 3.
Theoph., HP, VIII, 4.
Theoph., HP VIII, 4, 3; CP III, 21, 2.
Plin., HN XVIII, 21 (186).
DAI I, Cir., ii, nos. 10-14.
Ps.-Scylax, 108, 109, — cf. the name Ampelos; Schol. Aristoph. Pint. 925; Steph. Byz., 75 etc.
III, 50, 1.
Strabo XVII, 14 (799). Over forty vineyards of groups of vines: N.V.
Strabo XVII, 20 (836).
SEG 9, 4, 43-6.
Herod. IV, 161, 3.
Herod. IV, 164, 2.
P. Guirard, La propriété foncière en Grèce, 1893, pp. 111 sqq.; J. Hasebroek, Griechische Wirtschaft u. Gesellschaftsgeschichte his zur Perserzeit, 1931, pp. 217 sqq.; cf. Horn. II. II, 106, 705; IX, 154, and many other allusions, especially Arist. Pol., 1289b that horse-rearing states are most suitable for oligarchies, as Chalcis, Eretria, and Magnesia on the Maeander.
DAI I, Cir., ii, no. 12, 12.
SEG 9, 72, para. 2.
SEG 9, 4; DAI II, Cir. ii, no. 547, paras. 2, 3.
IV, 4, 7.
SEG 9, 3. 22.
Ibid., line 22.
DAI II, Cir. i, no. 12, 17.
SIG 619, 43; n. 6.
DAI I, Cir. ii, p. 36.
SIG 976, 23.
Stele no. 10 (DAI I, Cir. ii): 37, 293 drachmas; no. n: 30, 237 dr.; no. 12: 30, 875; no. 13; 38,052 dr.; no. 14: 33,647. The estate of Phainippos, in Attica, brought in an annual income of 31,700 dr. in the late 4th century BC, according to Demosthenes (Phaen., 1040, 1045). Its area was some 390 hectares, including 86 hectares of arable and 10 hectares of vineyards. The remainder was covered by woodland or scrub. But the prices brought in by crops in Attica differed greatly at that time from those in Cyrene (they were normally six times those of Libya), nor do we know the distribution and proportions of the crops grown on the Cyrenean temple estate. On Phainippos’ estate, see A. Jardé, Les céréales dans l’antiquité grecque, 1925, pp. 48 sqq.; 157 sqq.
J. Kent, Hesperia, 17, 1948, pp. 243 sqq.; Ziebart, Hermes 61, 1926, pp. 87 sqq.; Durrbach, REG 32, 1919, pp. 167 sqq.; IG¹ II, 2492 sq.
Plut., Vit., X; Oral. 84gd; Jardé, op. cit., p. 92, n. 2; 116, n. 2; cf. id., op. cit., p. 155, n. 1.
Jardé, op. cit., p. 162.
SEHHW, p. 235.
Jardé, op. cit., p. 151 n.
Ibid.
The Economics of Ancient Greece, 1940. pp. 44-5.
J. Kent, The Temple Estates of Delos, Hesperia 17, 1948, pp. 243 sqq. The actual sums paid in rent by individual farms are not recorded; we know only the total annual rents of five farm-units over six years of the 4th and 3rd centuries B.C.
BMA 7, p. 10.
ὶ
IG II², 834b. This inscription records the amounts of tithe (ἀπαρχή) sent to Demeter the same year from the lands of Attica.
DAI I, Cir. ii, nos. 10, 11, 12, 14, 21, 24.
N. Scaetta, Nozioni della Agricoltura Libica, 1924, p. 38; A. Maugini, Le Colonie Italiane, Flora ed Economia Agraria degli Indigent, 1934, p. 89.
XVII, 3, 23 (838): ‘The country nurtures trees for a hundred stades; for a distance of another hundred stades there is (soil) which is suitable only as arable and grows rice (ὄρυζα — certainly to be emended ὄλυρα = emmer-wlieat) owing to its dryness. Beyond these zones (the soil produces) silphium ’
Ibid.
Bonacelli, REC, 1931, p. 228.
La Valorizazzione dei Col. Ital., 1933, p. 176.
REC 1931, p. 225.
L. V. Bertarelli, Guida d’Italia, Libia, 1937. p. 125.
SCC, p. 148.
Valorizazzione, pp. 176 sqq.
Xen., Oec. XVI, 12, 14; Theoph. CP III, 20, 1-2.
IG II², 2493-339/8 BC.
IG II², 1241, 21-4.
Pap. Hamb. Inv. 319; Schnebel, Landwirtschaft, pp. 112, 223.
Ibid. καὶ μετὰ τὸν χρόνον μεταδώσω τὸν κλῆρον τὸ μὲν ἥμισυ πυρῷ καὶ ἄλλο τέταρτον ἀπὸ σπορᾶς γένων, τὸ δὲ λοιπὸν τέταρτον ἀπὸ χόρτου βρώματος βοῶν.
Plin., HN XVIII, 21 (186).
HP VIII, 4.
DAI II, Cir. ii, nos. 10, 12.
Theoph., HP VIII, 6, 1.
III, 105. It should however be remarked that his work is late and not dated with certainty.
M. Schnebel, Landwirtschaft hell. Ag., p. 202.
Cf. Xen., Oecon., XVII, 10.
HP VIII, 6, 6.
RIC, p. 85.
Piani, Valorizazzione, p. 176.
Mühlhofer, Speleal. Cir., pp. 24-5.
Keen, Agric. Devel., pp. 13-14.
Piani, op. cit., p. 174.
Bonacelli, REC, 1931, p. 225.
IV, 199.
Epp. 114, 148.
Ptol. IV, 4, 7.
Epig. 13. Cf. also Φίλωνος κώμη — Ptol. IV, 4, 6.
SEG IX, 1, 77; TA p. 102; SH VII, 1961, pp. 36-37.
C. E. Stevens, Cambridge Economic History I, 1942. pp. 91-2: C. Parain, ibid., p. 127.
Maugini, Le Colonie Italiane, p. 87.
The closest parallel to the normal form of agriculture prevalent in ancient Cyrene, survives on the unmodernized farms of Cyprus (Keen, Agric. Development, pp. 13, 14). These are worked on a two-field system; the more fertile tracts are sown to wheat, the less fertile to barley.Two thirds of the unsown are left fallow, and the rest is devoted to summer vetches. The soil gets its manure from the grazing of the livestock on the stubbles and the fallow. Summer legumes, vegetables etc. are grown by irrigation from runoff or from the watertable. In Cyprus the shortage of summer pasture still causes a constant struggle between the shepherd and the settled farmer.
The Attic medimnus was the equivalent of 51.84 litres.
SEG 9, 2; DAI II, Cir. i, pp. 31 sqq., n. 58.
Loc. cit., p. 86.
Ha III (Ital.), 1929, p. 396..
S. Zebelev, Contes rendues de l’Acad. des Sciences URSS, 1929, pp. 97 sqq. which has not been available to me.
Loc. cit,
RFC 83, 1935, pp. 124-5.
Eg. the price of wheat at Cyrene: 1 dr. 4/5; in Greece: 3-9 dr.; Cyrene, barley, 1-2 dr.; Greece, 2-5 dr.
PW Supp. 6, 1935, col. 890, sv. Sitos, Tafel.
Cirene, p. 23.
Jardé, op. cit., pp. 123-4.
Ibid., p. 124.
Il Mondo Classico, 4, p. 401.
Ibid.
Francotte, Mélanges du droit publique grecque, 1910, p. 293.
Loc. cit., p. 86.
Loc. cit.
Op. cit., p. 59.
Information from the late Professor Sir E. Evans-Pritchard.
Johnson ap. Frank, ESAR II, 1936, Egypt, p. 59.
Cf. Herod. IV, 198, 3; Maugini, Flora ed Economia, p. 99.
Guida, p. 120.
Nozioni, p. 38.
Agricoltura Coloniale, Nov. 1939, p. 636; Annuario Generale della Libia, 1938, p. 218.
Herod., IV, 160, 3.
Diod., XX, 4r.
Polyb., XXXI, 18.
WGA, p. 319.
Most of the poorer citizens may be identified with the Cyreneans who followed Ophelias in his African adventure.
GS I, 189: Diod. XVIII, 18; Plut. Phoc., 28, 14; 9,000 possessed an income of 2000 dr. or above; 12,000 an average of 200-240 dr.
See above, p. 35.
Ap. Jos., Ant., XIV, 7, 2 (115).
V. Ehrenberg, Der Griechische und der Hellenistische Staat (Gercke u. Norden. Einleitung, III, 3) 1932, p. 13.
Da Agostino ap. El, 10, p. 421, sv. Cirenaica.
Jew. Terr. Org. Rpt., p. 11.
Jardé, Cdrdales, pp. 134-5.
Op. cit., p. 135.
Evans Pritchard, BMA 7, p. 12, according to the figures of Ahlmann, op. cit.
WGA, p. 388; when the Athenian statesman Phormisios proposed at the end of the 4th BC to abolish the citizen rights of all Athenians not owing landed property, it was found that this step would affect 5,000 adult male citizens only, in a population of some 35,000-50,000 citizens.
Keen, op. cit., p. 32.
This area would have been sufficient to furnish the necessary income in normal years; half of it would have brought in, on a yield of 20 hi. the hectare 600 medimni, to be sold at Cyrene at that time at 3 dr. the medimnus, or 1440 dr. after the deduction of a tenth for seed and food, and a tenth for rent. Even after additional deductions for overheads, the income could be supplemented from the vineyards and the plantations.
See above, pp. 75-2.
It may be supposed that the other four cities of the country possessed not less than 100,000-150,000 inhabitants in this period. Beloch estimated the total ancient population at 240,000-300,000 (Die Bevölkerung der griechisch-römischen Welt, 1886, p. 259), and perhaps more in the Ptolemaic period. In 1923 the population of Cyrenaica numbered 185,000 (da Agostini), in 1944, 200,000. Gregory (Jew. Terr. Org. Rpt., p. 8) believed that the country was capable of supporting 240,000 souls with modem methods of water-conservation, whereas Mühlhofer (Spel. Cir., p. 19) estimated its absorptive capacity at 350,000 on the basis of the ancient cisterns.
BIDR 1928, pp. 15 sqq.
F. Heichelheim, ABP, p. 43.
SEG 9, 1, 4.
Segré thought (ibid.) that Θῖνις was identical with the Ἡρακλέους Θῖνοι of Ptolemy (IV, 4, 5-6), which appear to have been situated in the mountainous region south of Bengazi. This identification, however, is far from certain; it should be emphasized that θῖνοι means “coastal sand-banks”, so that the name may be connected with the shores of the Syrtis and with new colonization in the direction of that gulf following the war with Carthage in the second half of the 4th century.
SEG 9, I, para. 1, 3.
Ps. Scylax, 108. (Χερρονήσσοι).
CERP p. 485, n. 9.
Tarn, Griffiths, Hellenistic Civilization³, 1959, pp. 68 sqq.; PW 7, 1931, col. 1102 sqq. sv. Συμμαχία.
SEG 9, 1, paras. 7, 8; cf. Xen., Oecon., IV, 2; ‘and in certain cities, especially those deemed successful in war, no citizen is permitted to practise a handicraft’.
Cf. again Xen., Oecon. IV, 4 (which comes immediately after the sentence disqualifying craftsmen for political rights): ’Among the most respectable and necessary (livelihoods) are considered to be agriculture and the art of war, and both should be attended to with all energy.’ These words are put into the mouth of the King of Persia, but in the following chapters Socrates endeavours to prove that they are justified. Cf. also Arist. Pol., 1260a, 1278a, 1319a for the disqualifying of craftsmen and people earning their living by manual work. The main opposition was to craftsmen and labourers (cf. SEG 9, 1, para. 8), and perhaps affected traders — cf. SEG loc. cit.: “Whoever sells wine... or becomes a merchant (φορτηγός). Φορτηγός indeed can here also be interpreted as “porter” instead of “merchant”. Aristotle elicits suspicion of those engaging in maritime commerce (Pol. 1327ª). admitting reluctantly their necessity and the benefits derived from them by the state.
SEG 9, 1, para. 8, 4:... ἢ ἄλλοτε οἰκίας τὰς [Πτ]ολεμαικὰς ἐσέλ-θηι...
DAI I, Cir., ii, p. 63.
Cf. p. 95, above, on Synesius’ estates at Phycus, near the coast, and in the south of the Plateau (Epp. 114, 148). Here may be mentioned “Arim-mas’ Village” (Ἄριμμαντος κώμη — Ptol. IV, 4, 7) somewhere in the south of the country. The name Arimmas first appears among the city magistrates recorded in the constitution of Ptolemy Lagos (SEG 9, 1, para. 11, 77) at the end of the 4th century B.C.; it recurs in the 3rd century in the verse of Callimachus (Epig. 13) as the name of a Cyrenean nobleman, and appears in the 1st century B.C. on an inscription in the Temple of Apollo in the city (TA p. 102). The name occurs at least 14 times among the sepulchral and other inscriptions of Teucheira in the 1st centuries BC and AD, chiefly among elements that had reached the town in the Ptolemaic period. It is possible that they had taken the name of one of the Ptolemies’ trusted aides who had carried out the settlement at Teucheira. (See Sff 7, 1961, pp. 36-7). We may therefore see Arimmas as one of Cyrene’s notables, loyal to the Ptolemaic dynasty, who had obtained influence under Ptolemy Lagos, also as a proprietor of estates which included areas, and avillage-centre named after him, in the south of the Jebel.
SEG 9, 1, para. 11, 1. 66.
Ibid. line 63: μισθοφόροι τῶμ Πτολεμαίωι.
See p. 108.
SEHHW pp. 140 sqq.
J. Lesquier, Institutions militaires des Lagides, 1911, pp. 162 sqq
C. Ap., II, 4(44).
Cf. Tac. Ann. XIV, 18.
SEG 9, 352.
Goodchild, Tab. Imp. Rom., Cyren., p. 16. A third boundary stone with a similar inscription is at Cyrene; its place of origin is unknown to me.
De cond. agror., Lachmann, 122.
Cyrenaica 1:100,000, Part 2, 5048.
I have been unable to locate the precise position of these remains.
Reynolds, JRS 52, 1962, pp. 100-101. Jones (CERP, p. 362) held, perhaps on less reliable evidence, that royal land existed also between Teucheira and Euesperitae. My own conclusion, that part of the community of the former town consisted of katoikoi, might confirm his belief.
SEG 9, 350.
See p. 212.
Plin. HN, XIX, 3 (15).
JRS 55, 1965, pp. 119 sqq.; cf. Oost, Cl. Phil., 58, 1965, pp. 12, 13.
Ibid., p. 120.
One iugerum is the approximate equivalent of 2.5 dunams (0.25 hectare).
Cf. Jones, CERP, p. 362.
SEG 9, 5; DAI II, Cir., ii, no. 538.
Berytus, 1958, 12, p. 101, no. 1.
108.
CIG 5361 = REG 62, 1949, pp. 283 sqq., line it.
SEHHW, p. 916.
Ptol. IV, 4, 7. On internal evidence Ptolemy’s information on Cyrene derives from a time near to the conclusion of his work, i.e. c. AD. 150.
SEG 9, 112; Euergetes, Comment., viii, ap. Athen., XII, 73.
See above, p. 64.
SEG 9, 5, 26.
SEHHE, p. 283.
SEHHIV, p. 289.
SEG 9, 4.
BMC, no. 208, p. 47.
BMC, no. 223, p. 49.
Maugini, Flora ed. econ., p. 43.
BMC, p. lxvi.
DAI I, Cir. ii, nos. 30-43.
PW XX, 1919, col. 1578, sv. Kalendar.
SEG 9, 7; DAI I, Cir. i, p. 11.
W. Kubitscheck, Grundriss der Antiken Zeitrechnungen, 1928, pp. 222-3.
PW, loc. cit. 1578 sq.
DAI I, Cir. ii, no. 40.
Ibid., nos. 38, 40.
This division is termed by Schnebel (Landwirtschaft in hellenistischen Ägypten, p. 218), “the improved two-field system”.
Pap. Tebt. 115, for example — 116-113 B C.
Schnebel, op. cit., pp. 145-7; P. Zeno (C. C. Edgar, Catalogue géniralé des antiquites égyptiennes du Musie du Caire: Zenon Papyri), 59155; AP 9, 1928-30, pp. 207 sqq.
Schnebel, op. cit., pp. 230-1.
See the works referred to above.
DAI I, Cir. ii, no. 40.
Schnebel, op. cit., p. 207; M. Rostovtzeff, A Large Estate in Egypt in the Third Centurv BC, 1922, p. 85 and refs.
SEHHW p. 357.
In the stele SEG 9, 35 (DA I I, Cir. ii, no. 34), Oliverio read πισσά to mean pitch, and this reading would have added interesting evidence for the fostering of conifers by the Ptolemies, perhaps for purposes of shipbuilding. But a new stele published by Fraser (Berytus, 12, 1958, p. 104, no. 2), and dating to the period 290-280 approximately, makes it clear that πισσά is to be translated as “peas”. One plant, though unmentioned in the steles, was probably promoted by the Ptolemies in Cyrene, namely, the lentisk. This tree was introduced by them into Egypt (SEHHW, p. 1165), and is today very common in the rocky areas of the Jebel. In 1934 it covered some 200,000 hectares (Narducci, La colonizazzione della Cirenaica nett’ Antichild e nel Presente, 1934, p. 87).
DAI I, Cir. ii, p. 52, nos. 35-42.
Diod. XXXI, 33 and see here p. 62.
SEG 9, 5.
SEHHW, pp. 205 sq.; 615 sq.
SEHHW, pp. 195 sq.
SEHHW, p. 619.
SEHHW, pp. 917-8.
SEHI-IW, p. 235.
SEHHW, p. 305.
Rostovtzeff explained the low prices of oil and wine in Greece in the 2nd century B.C. by the existence of an adverse balance of imports and exports. (SEHHW, p. 628).
Strabo XVII, 3, 20 (836).
IV, 169.
VI, 3, 3: “It occupies a large area of Libya — it is said more than 4,000 stadia. It grows in great abundance around the Syrtis from Euesperitae onward.”
XVII, 3 (838 fin.).
HN, V, 5 (34).
Anab. III, 28.
IV, 4, 6.
AC 1922, p. 257.
HP VI 3, 6.
HP VI 3, 4.
Plin., HN XIX, 3 (15).
Anab. III, 28, 7.
HP VI, 3, 1.
RM² 97, 1964, pp. 185 sqq.
Solinus 27; Strabo XVII, 3, 22 (837) and see here n. p. 16.
SEHHW, pp. 293, 333, 385.
DAI I, Cir., i, p. 71, no. 9; SEG 9, 62.
Berytus, 12, 1958, p. 113, no. 7. Cf. F. Durrbach, Choix d’inscriptions de Délos, 1921-2, p. 207: “les titulaires étaient préposés aux écuries royales.” In the 4th century A.D., Cyrene was still exporting horses, mules and asses (Synes., Ep. 109). The donkeys of Libya are also mentioned in Jewish literature (M. Kilaim, VIII, 4; Shab. V, 1).
27.
C. Préaux, L’économie des Lagides, 1939, p. 225; SEHHW, p. 295, for this tax. See below for other taxes in Cyrene, evidently of the Ptolemies, as evidenced by the Neghames inscription. The latter testifies to a cult of Dionysus in that village; this cult was organized in Egypt by Ptolemy IV at the end of the 3rd century as a means of binding the peasantry to the monarchy, and Negharnes may have derived its internal organization from that time. The compulsory participation in the fight against locusts in Cyrene, described by Pliny (HN XI, 49 (105)), may have been an extension of the liturgies referred to in the Negharnes document.
Cf. IG XIV, 645, which prohibits grazing on fallow sown to green fodder.
SEHHW, p. 302.
Heichelheim, ABP, p. 46.
SEHHW, p. 302.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, Cirene, 1930, p. 18, n. 9.
BMC pp. xxx, xxxi.
DAI I, Cir., ii, p. 69.
Ibid., p. 71.
B. V. Head, Historia Nummorum, 1910, 868,
See p. 17.
Cf. BMC, p. lxxix.
Herod. IV, 181, 2; Synes. Ep. 148.
Arrian, Anab., III, 4, 3.
Herod. III, 13.
BMC p. xliii.
AI IV, p. 190.
See pp. 19 sqq.
SEG 9, 2, 54; DAI II, Cir. i, pp. 31 sq. no. 58, para. 54.
Jos. Vita, I, 3 (15).
On the roofing of houses in Cyrene with the timbers of the thuon see Theoph. HPV, 3, 7.
NAMC I, pp. 83, 95; cf. Rostovtzeff, SEHHW, pl. xli, 2.
SEG 9, x, para. 8, 48.
NV, V, 25/30 V, 31/33.
B. Walters, Catalogue of Greek and Roman Lamps in the British Museum, 1914, nos. 851, 1059, 1125; O. Bronneer, Corinth, Type XXV; cf. IEJ 7, 1957. pp. 154 sqq.
G. R. H. Wright, PEJ 1963, pp. 27 and 29; fig. 2.
Hermippus ap. Athen., I, 49.
Plin. HN, XXI, 6 (saffron); Theoph. HP, IV, 3, 1 (saffron); Athen. XV, 29, 38; 689a (roses). An inscription at Cyrene of the 4th century AD refers to the perfume dealers’ quarter of the city (ἀγρός Μυροπωλάς) — ASAA, I, 1914, p. 164.
Theoph. HP IV, 3, 1.
Cucumbers — Plin. HN, XX, 1 (3); truffles — Athen. I, 62; beans — Jer. Kilaim, VIII, 1, 31b.
Plut. Luc., 2; cf. Aelian, Varia histor., XII, 30, 4.
Plut., ad princip. inerud., XII, 89.
M. A. Levy, Siegel und Gemmen, 1869, no. 19; D. Diringer, Le iscvizione antico-ebraiche Palestinesi, 1934, p. *93, no. 34.
SP pl. 79, no. 7.
Cf. Εἴβας, an Aramaic name (Arabic — Hibbeh) — Preisigke NMA, p. 518; Maspéro, Papirus grecs d’époque Byzantine, III, 67.328, 3. (6th century), also SEG 15, 851; Berytus, 11, 1954-5. p. 53, n. 691: Εἰαειβᾶς, from Dura-Europos.
Memoires de l’Académie d’Inscriptions, 12, 1913, pp. 513-4, pl. i, 1.
N. Slouchz, My Travels in Libya, II, 1943, p. 239, n. 1.
Levi della Vida, AI I, pp. 224-5.
Goodchild, GJ 118, 1952, p. 147.
Procopius, de Aedif., VI, 2, 21-3.
C. Ap. II, 4 (44): “Ptolemy son of Lagos and Alexander entertained the same opinion concerning those (Jews) who settled in Alexandria; Ptolemy entrusted to them fortresses throughout Egypt, assuming that they would guard them loyally and well, and as he desired to strengthen his hold on Cyrene and the other cities of Libya, he sent part of the Jews to inhabit them.”
Ant. XIV, 7. 2 (116).
Op. cit., XII, 1 (7-8).
Op. cit., XII, 3 (24).
Ibid., XII, 5 (45).
12-14 (Thackeray).
SEG 9, 1, para. 1, 5; K. Friedmann, GSAI, ns. 2, iv. 1934, pp. 3 4“5.
SEG 9, i, para. 11, 72.
BSAA 9, 1907, pp. 35 sqq.; 25, 1930, p. 108.
Not. Dig. Or., (Seeck), XXVIII, 42.
Jos., BJ I, 9, 4 (191): Ant. XIV, 8, 2 (133).
Jos., BJ I, 8, 7 (175).
Jos., C. Ap., II, 36; BJ II, 18, 7 (488).
The Jews in Egypt, 1963, p. 43.
Tcherikover, Fuks, CPJ I, 1957, 3, 17, 44-6; Tcherikover, HCJ, pp. 275 sqq.
CPJ I, 1957, 13.
OGIS 229, 72 (Magnesia).
Jos., Ant XII, 3, 4 (147) sqq.
Ibid., para. 151, and cf. Schalit, JQR 50, 1960, pp. 289 sqq.
Illustrated London News, Mar. 21, 1964, no. 6503, p. 432.
OGI I, 211; cf. Strabo, XIII, 4, 4, 625. Cf. also OGI 290 (Acrasos, Asia) — which Robert, REA 1934, p. 523, restored ol περί Ἄ]κρασον Μακεδόνες, and Jones, CERP, p. 44, and n. 26 genera/ly.
P. Guiraud, Histoire de la propriété foncière en Grèce, 1893, pp. 153 sqq.
IG XII, 3, no. 327; Klio, 17, 1920, p. 94, n. 1.
CIL III, 355.
J. Lesquier, Inst. Mil. Lag., pp. 162 sqq.
Op. cit., p. 164; F. Uebel. Die Kleruchen Ägyptens unter den ersten seeks Ptolemäer, 1968, p. 3.
For a list, Tcherikover, op. cit., (n. 22), pp. 35-43; CPJ I, Sect. iii, pp. 147 sqq.
Pap. Petrie, xxix.
Jos. C. Ap., I, 186-9; compare especially Tcherikover, HCJ, p. 300
OGIS 96.
L. Mitteis, U. W. Wilcken, Gründzuge u. Chrestomathie der Papiruskunde, 1911, p. 55; CPJ I, no. 33.
OGIS 726.
Pap. Lille, II, 235.
CIL III, Supp. (i-ii), 6583.
Ap. Jos., Ant. XII, 1, 5 (1).
Syr., 50 (viii).
Ap. Jos., C. Ap. I, 186 sq.
HCJ, pp. 55-8.
Ib., p. 55.
As V. Ehrenberg, Hermes 65, 1930, pp. 332 sqq.; also Heuss and Taeger.
Diod. XIX, 85, 4.
See p. 175.
Inscribed on a tomb near a spring called Gigi, according to Slouschz (Travels, II, p. 227). I have not succeeded in identifying this spot.
SB, 302: Πασιμένης Κυρηναῖος β΄ Ἰάσων Κυρηναῖος α΄ Ἀἣᾶδάμας.
Ant. XIV, 7, 2 (116).
I Macc. 16, 15-23.
The sacrifices for the dead alluded to in II Macc. 12139 and quite alien to the Judaism of Judaea, may be a trace of Libyan Jewish influence.
Schurer believed (GJV III, 1909, pp. 482 sqq.) that the author used eyewitnesses who were contemporaries of the Maccabees, but some years after the events described; Willrich regarded the book as unreliable. Others (Biichler, Laqueur, Wellhausen) thought the book contained authentic information mingled with fable. Torrey ((The Aocryphal Literature, 1946, pp. 76 sqq.) stated that the work contained vivid touches which point to the evidence of eye-witnesses. Pfeiffer (Hist. N.T. Times, p. 516) expresses the view that the book used written sources rather than eyewitness accounts. For a new summing up of the problems involved, and a conclusion in favour of the work as a source contemporary with the events described, Tcherikover, HCJ, pp. 381-90.
II Macc. 4, 11; cf. I, 8, 17.
HCJ, pp. 384-5: several scholars have suggested that Jason son of Elea’zar, Judah the Maccabee’s contemporary, was the same as Jason author of II Maccabees; thus Keil, Comm, über die Bücher der Makk., 1875, p. 275.
BIES 22, 1958, pp. 74 sqq.; SH 7, 1961, p. 40. The present treatment supersedes the above interpretations.
SEG 9, 440.
See Tcherikover, Jews of Egypt, p. 290, on the Jewish associations of the name Dositheos.
SEG 9, 424.
SEG 9, 439.
SEG 9, 441.
Ant. XIII, 6, 5 (203). In several places the name is spelt with one delta only.
Jer. Ta’an., IV 69a; Mid. Lam. R., II, 2; Sepher Ha-Yishuv, 1939, I, p. 92.
There are clear proofs that Haddid was a Jewish settlement at least down to the period of the Mishnah. It had been walled, according to tradition, since the days of Joshua (M.’Arakh. IX, 6), was resettled by Babylonian exiles, (Ezra, 2:33; Neh. 7:37), and was fortified by Simon the Hasmonean. (I Macc. 12:35). It was Simon’s base against Trvphon, was captured by Vespasian in tiie Great Rebellion (BJ, IV, 9, 1-486), and was subsequently a residence of mishnaic scholars. Its population would therefore appear to have been overwhelmingly Jewish for a prolonged period. Our information on Kephar Harrubali is sparser; it was improbably the village of that name associated with the outbreak of the revolt of Ben Kosba, but rather the place known east of Lydda.
Bull. of the Louis Rabbinowitz Fund for the Exploration of Ancient Synagogues, III, 1960, pp. 57 sqq.; Studi Biblici Franciscani, 4, 1953’4> p. 228 ad voc.; IEJ 3, 1953, p. 133. The name of the village is otherwise mentioned first in Byzantine sources; see K. H. Palmer, 1 he Desert oj the Exodus, II, 1871, Appendix 1), p. 552, containing the episcopal list of the year 534.
For these developments, Tcherikover, Fuks, CPJ I, pp. 23-4; Tcherikover, The Jews in Egypt, pp. 39, 46; HCJ, p. 334.
Justin VIII, 2; Polyb. XXXIV, 6 (1314); cf. Oliverio, DAI I, Cir. i, pp. 16 sqq.
But I have been unable to find in the relevant excavation report any authority that the attack, which is shown to have taken place by the presence of the ballista-balls fired by the attackers, was not mounted by the forces of Vespasian in A.D. 73 (BJ VIII, 8, 10, 3-483) rather than by those of Euergetes II. Cf. Tarbiz, 25, 1959, p. 422, n. 10.
Jos., C. Ap. II, 53-5. Cf. III Macc. II, 25 sq., which, presumably in error, attributes the event to the reign of Ptolemy IV Philopator; see Tcherikover, Zion. 10, 1935, pp. 1 sqq.; also in The Jews in the Greek and Roman World, 1961, pp. 339 sqq. (Heb.); CPJ I, pp. 21-3.
Tcherikover, Zion, 10, 1945, pp. 1 sqq. (Heb.); SII 7, 1961, pp. 1 sqq.
SEG 9, 5.
Tcherikover, HCJ, p. 282; SB 5862, 7454.
BMC p. c]xi.
BMC pl. xxxii, pp. 8-17; G. F. Hill, Brit. Mus. Cat. Greek Coins, Palestine, 1914, pl. xxii-xxiv.
BMC p. 87, Gp. viii, 83.
Israel Numismatic Society Publications: A. Kindler, apud The Dating and Meaning of the Ancient Jewish Coins and Symbols (Pubns. Numis. Soc. Studies, II), 1958, p. 11; A. Reifenberg, Ancient Jewish Coins, 1940, pl. iii, 33a.
SEG 9, 2, 57; DAI II, Cir. i, p. 31, no. 58.
Sepher ha-Yishuv, I, pp. 79 sqq., and see here pp. 306-7.
SEG 9, 1938, 559-567, 569, 572-724; SEG 16, 1959, 876-930; 20, 1964, 769-771; DAI II, Cir. ii, 1936, pp. 198 sqq.; Rowe et al, MUC 1952, ch. vii, pp. 43 sqq.; S. Applebaum, SH 7, 1961, pp. 27 sqq.: The Jewish Community of Hellenistic and Roman Teucheira in Cyrenaica; G. R. R. Wright, PEQ 1963, pp. 22 sqq.: Excavations at Tocra.
For these, Wright, ibid. (n. 1), pp. 27, 36 sq. The discussion on date concerns all the known burial courts (latomie) near the town, whether gentile or Jewish. The Jewish burials will be discussed separately.
In his previous study of the Teucheira Jewish epitaphs, the writer was under the impression that part of the inscriptions published by Oliverio in DAI and by SEG were from tombs to the west of the town. This impression was based on the assumption that Oliverio had followed Halbherr (to whose plan the writer had access) in the numbering of the tomb-courts. In effect the western inscriptions are cut in the city-wall and in the wall of the adjacent gymnasium. The present study, therefore, is a revision of the author’s previous publication.
Eg. SEG 9, 612: Γηλ΄ = the thirty-eighth year of Augustus or of the era of Actium, ie. A.D. 7.
SEG 9, 498: Αὐτοκρατόρος Δομιτιανοῦ Καίσαρος. The attempt of J. Gray (MUC 1952, pp. 54-55) to prove the use of the era of Actium, is not convincing. See SH 7, p. 31.
Lovδ΄ τοῦ κὰι γ’ αὐτοκρατόρος Μ Αὐρηλίου Σεβήρου Ἀλεξάνδρου... Cf. CIG III, 2, 5 145b; SEG 9. 184.
It should be remarked that there is no certainty if the year of the constitution of the province was regarded as 74 or as 67 B.C. when Cyrene was administratively merged with Crete. See Appian, Bell. Civ., I, in; RC para. 73.
PEQ 1963, pp. 37 sqq., tombs A-E.
Ibid. = J. Gray, ap. MUC, 1952, Chap, vii, pp. 43 etsqq.
This after much rereading and revision of inscriptions by Miss Joyce Reynolds. Known dates of Teucheira epitaphs, according to the era of Actium. All reference numbers are those of SEG with the exception of that marked W4, which was recorded by Webster.
BC
895 20
885 19
904 19
905 19
913 16
704 11
650 10
670 10
681 10
917 9
705 8
612 7
888 6
923 5
653 4
AD
882 18
877 27
561 60
921 64
884 68
W4 70
880 73
889 73
880 74
639 76
640 76
641 76
593 78
594 78
600 77
883 79
894 79
909 80
498 87
901 94
SEG 9, 591 — Λ Αἰλίω; 522 — Μ Αὐρ[ήλ]ιος Νιγ[ρῖνο]ς.
522, 582, 583, 585, 591, 615, 712, 602, 620, 623, 624, 644, 668, 674, 676, 724; Gray nos. 1, 8, 9, 12, 25, 41.
Breccia, Iscriz. gr. e lat., nos. 27, 28.
Eg. ibid., nos. 238, 242, 246.
Ibid., nos. 251, 253.
Annales du service des antiquités d’Égypte, 19, 1920, p. 216; 22, 1923. pp. 7-16; ZNTW, 22, 1923. pp. 280 sqq.
Wright, PEQ (n. 1), pp. 54-5 (Tomb A).
Jos. C. Ap., II, 4 (33-6); cf. Ant. XIV, 7, 2 (117); I, Bell, Juden und Griechen in romiscken Alexandrien, 1926, p. 19.
This statement is correct, of course, only if the writer’s view is justified that not all the Teucheira quarry-tombs were Jewish. If on the other hand the opinion of some scholars is accepted, that they were all Jewish, then it
Above, n. 98.
This inscription was published in SEG 16 (894) with the note: infra titulum Hebraicum expressum. I have examined the photograph of this inscription, sent to me by the kindness of Miss J. Reynolds, but it is so faint as to be indecipherable, and its Hebrew character cannot be regarded as certain.
JJS 13, 1962, p. 34; SEG 9, 596. Gray thought to see in “Hermon” a transliteration of Hiram, and in Herennos a form of Aaron, but I am not convinced. One of his suggestions, however, that Arimmas is Ahiram, or Jehoram, requires additional comment, which will be found below.
CPJ 1, p. 28; SEG 9, 446. Θαννύρας (cf. Heb. tanur = oven) is also found as a Semitic name (cf. H. Wuthnow, Die semitische Menschennamen in griechischen Inschriften und Papyri des Vorderen Orients, 193°, ad voc.). It appears in the area to the west of the town of Teucheira, but cf. SEG 9,.135, 348; Herod. Ill, 15 (Θαννύρας), where it is Libyan.
Cf. SB 6651 (Tel el-Yehudieh); Philo, In Flaccum, VI, 39.
SEG 9, 703.
SEG 9,642.
C. Clermont-Ganneau, Archaeological Researches in Palestine, 1899, II, p. 145. no. 7. Diehl, CICV, II, 1924, — Tituli Judaici, 4895a, 4858a, 4858; L. Jalabert, R. Mouterde, Inscr. grecques et latines de la Syrie, (1929-), 459b, 487, 625.
NW VI, 28/30; cf. V, 24; Βασσαχέως; VI, 42/3, ἐν τῷ Βασσάχι.
Ptol. IV, 5, 21.
P. Tebt. 64 (e) iii; 72, 322 etc.; ib., 61(a) 19 etc.; Lesquier, Inst. mil. Lagides, pp. 193-5. In P. Tebt. I, 32, we read of the establishment of cle-ruchies by a high-ranking personage holding the rank of “first friend“.
The name Arimmas is also found in a list of settlers settled near Ptolemais in the time of Pompey (circa 67 BC) — Reynolds, JRS 52, 1962, p. 100, no. 5.
CIG. 5265.
BIES 18, 1954, pp. 32, 3, nos. 202-3.
SEG 9, 557, 558.
PEJ 1963, p. 55. For an amplified reading, which unfortunately adds nothing comprehensible, SEG 16, 771.
One may recall in this connection the supposed belief of Jason of Cyrene, author of the original book of which II Macc. is an epitome, in the resurrection of the dead (II Macc. 12:39-45). Cf. Levi, RE 29, 1894, pp. 43 sqq.; REJ 41, 1900, pp. 161 sqq.
SEG 9, 641.
683, 709, 722.
On names of this category borne by Jews, see Tcherikover, Jews in Egypt, p. 192.
The comparison was made with the aid of the card-catalogue of the late Professor Tcherikover, and I would like to record his generous assistance in this matter.
Wright, PEJ, 1963, p. 40, (Tomb C), does not publish the text of the inscription, nor is the stele mentioned by Gray, but the late M. N. Tod had a copy of the epitaph and I have seen the stele in Tocra Museum.
E. Naville, The Mound of the Jew and the City of Onias, Egyptian Exploration Fund, 1888-9, pp. 13 sqq.
The case, indeed, is doubtful; see below.
Cf. IEJ 7, 1957, pp. 155 sqq.
TEJ 6, 1956, pp. 127-8.
But the name occurs among gentiles, eg. in Attica (SEG 15, in; 23, 86, line 284).
SB 1742. For Sarah as a name taken by proselytes, Baron, SRHJ I, 1935. p. 14. Cf. the Jew with a Libyan name (Ἄλζαν Συμώνος) found in the Jaffa cemetery — Sepher Ha-Yishuv. I, p. 85, no. 41.
Muller, FHG, frag. 141 = Jacoby, FGH, II, frag. 123. This practice was common among many primitive peoples, eg. among certain strata of the British population in the Roman period; cf. Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society, 69, pp. 33 sqq.; but the case at Teucheira might also be interpreted as the result of the custom of liqut ha-atzamot (M. Mo’ed Qatan, I, 5).
CIG III, 5167 = SB 5886- AD 88-9 (Cyrene).
NAMC 2, pp. 173, 177 n.
The letters concerned correspond to the first, third and twenty-fifth letters as listed by Halevi-Tourneau (O. Bates, The Eastern Libyans, 1914, p. 86). A fourth perhaps corresponds to their twenty-first. The presence of these letters was first noted by the writer in Zion, 19, pp. 46-7. Gray has no hint of them, but there is no reason to cast doubt on the reliability of the readings of Col. Thackrah made available to the writer, and they also appear on the sketches made by Halbherr, which I have been able to examine.
HCJ, p. 293; n. 87, p. 505. The evidence was assembled by Mantcufel, Tell Edfu, 1937, p. 147. Cf. Tarn, Griffiths, HC, 1952, pp. 100-102, who wrote concerning the family situation in the Hellenistic period: The general conclusion from c. 230 onwards seems certain: the one-child family was commonest, but there was a certain desire for two sons (to allow for a death in war); families of four or five were very rare; more than one daughter was very seldom reared; and infanticide on a considerable scale, particularly of girls, is not in doubt.”
Old Age among the Greeks, 1933, pp. 231 sqq.
CIJ I, p. cxvi. Cf. at Teucheira SEG 9, 713: “Secunda daughter of Fabius and wife of Aristos; deceased at the age of twelve.”
Cf. the tombstone of Bassara, imperial slave-woman, at Ptolemais (Βάσσαρας Καίσαρο[ς] δούλης) — Pacho, Relation d’un voyage dans la Mar-marique, 1827-9, pl. lxxv.
ClJ I, p. cxv.
Robinson, AJA² 17, 1913, p. 191, n. 108.
Cf. B. Gittin, 65a; ’Arachin, 25a.
Wright, summing up previous excavations, finds that all the tombs in the quarries to east of the town are Roman, but discovers earlier elements among those to west of it. His finding is appropriate to our own conclusion. It should be stressed that we see the epitaphs of the eastern sector as representing the generation of Teucheira Jews of the Roman period, but not the first generation of their community, which belonged to the hellenistic period.
On the term “Macedonian” in Ptolemaic Egypt, see Tcherikover, Jews in Egypt, pp. 42 sqq.; CPJ I, p. 14; M. Launey, Recherches snr lets armi]ées hellénistiques, 1949-50, I, pp. 308 sqq.
Cf. Wright on Teucheira (PEQ 1963, p. 23): “The terrain is characterized by rocky outcrops, the steeply-dipping strata of which are visible on the surface. The soil, however, is good, and numerous wells once supplied fresh water, so that the city must have been something of an agricultural centre. It was this and not its position on the coast per se which must have prompted settlement for... facilities for harbourage are completely lacking.”
The name “Pentapolis” does not appear before the 1st century BC, when Pliny (HN V, 5 (31)) enumerates as the five cities of Libya, Berenice, Arsinoe (Teucheira), Ptolemais, Apollonia and Cyrene. According to his evidence, the group of cities associated with this name did not precede the conversion of Apollonia to an independent city, an event not anterior to the 2nd century B.C. See p. 59, n. 354.
CIG 111, 5362 and the reexamination of G. and J. Roux, REG 62, 1949, pp. 290 sqq.
An honorary inscription closely akin to the present tablet in language and circumstances is OGI 737, of the 2nd century B.C., from Memphis. The politeuma of the Idumaeans here thanks a high official for painting and plastering (τήν τε καταλιφήν καὶ κονίασιν) the Temple of Apollo which belonged to the politeuma.
REG 62, 1949, pp. 284 sqq.; CIG III, 5361.
BIES 25, 1961, pp. 167 sqq.; pp.12, 1957, pp. 132 sqq.; REG 72, 1959, pp. 275-6; SEG 17, 823.
Eg. line 3 τῆ(ι)συναγωγῆ(ι); line 4, ἐπιδόντας has been corrected to ἐπιδόντες, when it ought to be ἐπιδόντος; in line 12 Ἡρακλείδης and Ἡρακλαίδου appear in propinquity; in line 16 Ἀντίγον(ο)ς is read.
It can be argued that the reference is to one synagogue among several contemporarily existent in the city, and that the archontes belonged to it. But this suggestion seems to be disproved by the inscription’s expression “resolved by the synagogue of the Jews of Berenice and its vicinity” (ἐφάνη τῆ(ι) συναγωγῆ(ι) τῶν ἐν Βερνεικίδι Ἰουδαίων).
Cf. CPJ I, 9-10, n. 25; HCJ p. 303.
Gen. 3:20. It was my late wife who drew my attention to the meaning of the Greek name.
Names especially characteristic of Cyrene are Euphranor, Pratomedes and Carnedas, while Ammonios and Serapion are common in Egypt. The following names, present in the third inscription from Berenice, all recur together among hundreds of names on a stele at Cyrene (unpublished) which lists gentile contributors of the 1st century B.C.: Carnedas, Euphranor, Lysanias, Jason, Pratis, Pratomedes, Straton, Cartisthenes, Thaliarchos, Zoilos.
Alexandras, Euphranor, Lysanias. Marion.
At Hamat Gader and Apamea, for instance.
G. Foucart, RA², 1864, p. 465; S. Reinach, Traité d’épig. grecque, 1885, p. 549; C. Kraeling, Gerasa, 1938, no. 365 = SEG 7, 894: and cf. Galen, Περὶ μέτρων καὶ σταθμῶν, ii.
P. Wesseling, Diatribe de Judaeorum Archontibus, 1738; for the second view; also G. Caputo, Anthemon, (Scritti di arch, e di antichita in onore de C. Anti), 1955, pp. 281-291.
REG 62, pp. 290-1.
Ibid.
M. Bieber, History of the Greek and Roman Theater, 1961, p. 170.
CIL X, 852.
Strabo XIV, 143 (649) — Mesogis near Nysa.
Jos, Ant., XV, 8, 1 (268); cf. A. Smith, Jerusalem, 1908, pp. 493-4.
I. T. Hill, The Ancient City of Athens, 1953, pp. 55 sqq.
REG loc. cit., p. 291.
C. Kraeling, Ptolemais, City of the Libyan Pentapolis, 1961, pp. 89 sqq.
IEJ 15, 1965, pp. 76 sqq.
M. Avi-Yonah, et al., Masada, Survey and Excavations, 1957, pp. 4-5; Jos., BJ, VII, 8, 4 (300).
Arch. News of the Dept, of Antiquities of Israel, 30, 1969, p. 28 (Heb.).
For a survey of various examples of the hypostyle hall, see C. Anti, Teatri greci arcaici, 1947, ch. vi, pp. 153 sqq.
D. S. Robertson, A Handbook of Greek and Roman Architecture, 1943, pp. 176 sq.; T. Wiegand, H. Schrader, Priene, 1904, pp. 176 sqq.
SB 5918; NAMC I, 1915, p- 152: fig. 42: CIG III, 5328; Kraeling, Ptolemais, pp. in sq.; p. 215, nos. 48-51.
N. Avigad, IEJ 12, 1962, pp. 1 sqq., no. 7 (a).
Unpublished. It were well to remark that the list contains six theophoric names, hence it is possible that there were other Jews in the list who cannot be identified; cf. especially Timostheus son of Onasion; the latter name appears also on the second inscription of the Berenice politeuma, CIG III, 5361.
ILS 897; CIL XIV, 2109. The slab is now in the Capitoline Museum at Rome, where I have been able to examine it.
Cf. JVFIV, 12: Ἰθαννύρον; VII, 6: Ἰ θάλατος.
QAL 4,1961, p. 20, no. 7, (c) 3.
CIJ I, 555
Hor., Sat., I, v, 100; Credat Iudaeus Apella.
The inhabitants of the city are called in a Cyrenean inscription of the time of Domitian (A.D. 88— CR p. 102, n. 3) Ptolemaenses. The form Πτυλιμαϊκὴ appears on a Jewish ossuary of the 1st century AD in Jerusalem (see p. 216, n.), the substitution of ’ο’ for ’υ’ here showing that the inscription is that of a Jewess of Cyrene. The citizens of Egyptian and Phoenician Ptolemais are called by the Digesta (50, 15, 1) and the Vulgata (I Mach. xii, 48; II Mach. xiii, 25) Ptolemenses, whereas the adjective Ptolemaieus (Cic., de fin., 5, 1, 1) means “that which belongs to Ptolemy”. The citizens of Cyrenean Ptolemais and Ptolemais of Egypt are also Πτολεμαιείς (CIG 5186; OGIS 49; 50).
JRS 17, 1927, p. 150, n. 2.
Dessau, ILS ad 897; B. Borghesi, Oeuvres computes, 1862-97, VII. p. 488.
PW IX, 1934, sv. Terentius (92), col. 708.
Ap. de Ruggiero, Dizz. Epig., II, 1910, 1436.
In the 2nd century B.C. the words δημόσια πράγματα meant “public affairs” (SIG³ 674, 72) or “the public interest” (ib. 646, 35); in the 1st century B.C. we find the expression used to translate the word respublica (SB 4224, 2). In Roman Egypt δημόσια generally was used to denote state property and especially imposts levied by the state, also state domain. (F. Preisgke, Wdrterbuch der griechischen Papyruskunde, 1925, p. 337; cf. Suidas (Adler), II, p. 47, no. 461: Δημοσίων πραγμάτων διοικέτης, οἷον φροντιστὴς χορηγίας...
Cyrenaica map 1:100,000, Section 2, (194 ). 5036, where it appears as ‛Ein Targhuna. EI X, 1931, p. 428, has Taurguni; the local pronunciation is “Targuna” or “Tarkhuna”. See here end-map 5.
DAI II, Cir. i, 1933, fig. 106; CR fig. 32.
DAI II, Cir. i, p. 128, figs. 104-5; AA 1926, col. 450.
SEG 9, 352 = DAI II, Cir. i, p. 129, no. 137; Tab. Imp. Rom. HI 34, Cyrene, pref. pp. 16-17.
The place where the stone was found is called Gasr Nuara by Good-child, ibid., opposite p. 16.
Bull. Amer. Inst. Arch., 2, 1910-1911, p. 136, pl. xxxviii; CR p. 201; fig. 19.
See p. 80 and fig. 5.
Examples are Gasr Belgara (1:100,000 (2), 4947) near Zavia Beda, the ancient Βαλάκραι (Paus. II, 26); Siret Maga, apparently derived from the name of the Cyrenean king Magas, east of Cyrene (1:100,000 (2), 5048); Meneqret, the name of a Greek rockcut tomb south of Barce, derivable from the Greek name Menecrates (W. Papé, G. Benseler, WGE, 1911, II, p. 897, ad voc.); Negharnes, the Graeco-Roman village east of Cyrene, evidently to be identified with Ptolemy’s Ἀρχίλη, (IV, 4, 6) — 1:100,000 (2), 5874.
Y. Press, Encyc. of Eretz Yisrael, 1948, II, p. 381, ad voc. (Heb.).
Targ. Jonathan. (Argov), Deut. 3; 4, Yalqut Shim’oni, Deut. ’Eqev, T’snn.חחעייד
Eg. Heb. פרצוף (Greek πρόσωπον); Heb. פלחד (Greek πρατήρ).
Eg. Adamah — Ademiyeh; Gilgal — Jaljulieh; Parod — Faradiyeh.
Jos., Ant. XVI, 9, 3 (292); Strabo XVI, 2, 16 (755); 2, 20 (756).
Jos., Ant. XVII, 2, 1 (24-5).
Ibid. XVIII, 2, 1 (24).
Ibid. XV, 10, 1 (346).
Epp. 132.
For mounted archers in Libya, cf. those illustrated in AI 4, 1931, pp. 191, 195, on a gold placque of the 5th century B.C. from the Temple of Apollo at Cyrene. Libyan archers are mentioned in inscriptions of the Pharaoh Mereneptah— J. H. Breasted, Records of Egypt, 1927, III, paras. 579, 609. For Libyan cavalry, Caes, Bell. Afric., VII, 5. Cf. Coh. III Cyrenai ca Sagittariorum, A E 1896, 10; Cyrenean archers in the Roman army of Cappadocia in the early 2nd century C.E.— Arrian. Ekt. Alan., I, 18.
The transfer of part of the Babylonian unit from Bathanea to Cyrene, if it took place, was apposite to the period; somewhere about 9 BC Herod moved Idumaeans to Bathanea; cf. Sulpicius Quirinius’ expulsion of Ituraeans from their hillforts in 6 B.C. (Eph. Ep. IV, 537). There are several hints of Herodian contacts with Cyrene; cf. Idumaean inscriptions in the cult cave of Budrash near Cyrene — NAMC 3,1971, p. 99; Nicolaus of Damascus had information on Libyan burial customs — see here p. 154
SEG 9, 773, 775, 781.
S. Ferri, Rivista di Tripolitania 2, 1925-6, pp. 363 sqq.; CR, p. 77; JRS 43, 1953, p. 76.
See pp. 68-9 sqq.
Tcherikover, The Jews in Egypt, p. 19.
Zion, 19, pp. 26, 48; NV I/35; IV 12/15.
The name of the mason Sidonius Selumaio engraved on a funerary monument of A.D. 88-99 (CIG III, 517C = SB 5880); cf. CIL VIII, 21900; 14106; RA 4, p. 373.
Clay lamps from Cyrene; see pp. 235 sqq.
The painter of the ζωγραφήματα in the Berenice amphitheatre.
The influence of Jewish coinage on that of Cyrene; see p. 143.
Coster, in Studies in Economic and Social History in honour of A. C. Johnson, ed. Coleman Norton, 1951, p. 15, n. 68, states erroneously that Jonathan the Weaver was a Jew of Cyrene; it is however possible that the found supporters among Jewish weavers in that city.
We read of a qth-century Jewish ship sailing from Alexandria to Cyrene (Synes. Ep., 4). Cf. inscriptions of Libyan Jews at Jaffa (Sepher ha-Yishuv, nos. 41, 54, 85), and links between Cyrene and ’Akko which hint as sea-communication between Cyrene and Judaea from very early times. There may also be evidence that the rising of 115-117 affected Jaffa (see here p. 306).
Pacho, Relation d’un voyage en Marmarique, pl. LXXV.
REG, 1969, p. 535, no. 618.
Jos., BJ, VIII, 11, 2 (445).
Ibid. 1 (438).
OGIS 760; SIG 108 etc.; CIG 90, 92 etc.; P. Guiraud, Propriéte foncière, pp. 152-7; Busolt, GS pp. 297, 302.
Ant. XVI, 6, 1 (160): “The cities had dealt evilly with the Jews who dwelt in Asia and in the neighbourhood of Cyrene of Libya, to whom the former kings had granted isonomia.”.
Ant. XVI, 6, 1 (161).
Strabo ap. Jos., Ant. XIV, 7, 2 (115).
Rostovtzeff, SEHHW, p. 333.
QAL 4, 1961, p. 20, no. 7.
Cf. for example Theochrestos son of Theochrestos, Theodotos son of Theodotos and Theodoras son of Nicanor. We also find Simon son of Orion, of ambiguous origin. It is not quite clear to me whether Professor K. M. T. Atkinson (Ancient Society and Institutions: Studies presented to Victor Ehren-berg, 1966, The Third Cyrene Edict of Augustus, p. 24), thinks that all the Jews of Cyrene possessed citizenship on the evidence here discussed; I suggest below (pp. 234-5) that only a minority obtained the privilege.
QAL 4, 1961, p. 16, no. 2.
See SEG 8, 641, apparently from Ptolemais in Egypt, for the connection between gymnasium education and the obtaining of citizen rights.
P. Lon. 1912; I. Bell, Jews and Christians in Egypt, 1924, pp. 23 sq.; CP] II, no. 153.
Tcherikover, HCJ, p. 323: 513, n. 77.
Loc. cit.
CPJ II, no. 141.
Tcherikover, I.e.
Ibid. lines 89-93: καὶ Ἰουδείους δὲ ἄντικρυς μηδὲν πλήωι ὧν πρότερον ἔσχον περιεργάζεσθαι... ἐν ἀλλοτρίᾳ πόλει.
The independent identity of each document has been argued by Dr. A. Kasher in his Ph. D. dissertation “The civic status of the Jews of Egypt in the Hellenistic and Roman periods” (Tel Aviv University, 1972), chap. 9, pp. 299 sqq. See also I. D. Amusin, The Letter and Edict of Claudius Caesar, Westnik Drevnoj Istorii, 1949 (2), pp. 221-8, cited by Dr. Kasher, and not available to me.
HCJ p. 325; cf. CPJ I, p. 56, n. 20.
BGU IV, 1140 = CPJ II, no. 151.
Xenoph., Hieron, VIII, 10; Strabo VIII, 5, 4 (305).
Ehrenberg, The Greek State, 1960, p. 51.
Ehrenberg, Polis and Imperium, 1965, pp. 279 sqq.; op. cit. p. 285.
Eg. SEG 3, 122; cf. A. Heuss, Staat und Herrscher des Hellenismus, pp. 64 sq., Klio Beih. 39, 1937.
E. Szanto, Das griechisches Bürgerrecht, 1892, pp. 67 sqq.; Busolt, GS, 1920 pp. 295 sqq.
F. Griffiths, Tarn, Hellenistic Civilization³, 1952, p. 222.
I owe this point to Dr. A. Kasher.
GIG 5361, 15 sq.
The same interpretation is adopted by Taubenschlag, The Law of Greco-Roman Egypt in the Light of the Papyri, 332 BC-640 AD, 1948, p. 19, n. 2.
Plin. Ep. x, 6, 10; also ib. 7.
Decmus Valerius Dionysius and M. Laelius Onasion.
SEG 9, 8, para. III, 56-62.
Jos. Ant., XVI, 6, 5 (169-170).
Ibid. For a detailed discussion of this episode, and of Jewish status in the Greek cities of the period, see the writer. The Jewish People in the First Century, ed. Safrai, Stern, 1974, I, Chap. viii, pp. 434-454.
Ant. XVI, 6, 1 (160).
Les Juifs dans l’Empire romaine, I, 1914, p. 150 and n. 3.
Ant. XVI, 6, 5 (169).
Ant. XVI, 6, 2 (162).
QAL 4, 1961, p. 16, no. 2.
In Asia Minor Jews appear as city-magistrates in the 3rd century A.D. after the Constitutio Antoniniana — cf. especially Cl J 788 (Corycus) and 760 (Blaundos).
The name Ele’azar (Elasaros) was common among Cyrenean Jews in the Hellenistic period. It appears four times in Egypt on inscriptions (Tcherikover, Jews in Egypt 2, p. 186; cf. CPJ, I, p. 84). It occurs twice in Cyrene (QAL 4, no. 7, 48). It is interesting to find that the hellenistic writer Lobon (FHG III, para. 209) mentions the Libyan king of Barka, Aladdeir (CIG 5147; Herodot. IV, 164, 4) under the form Ἐλεάζαρ, which perhaps reflects Jewish influence among the Libyans.
E. Ghislanzoni, RAL6 I, 1925, pp. 406 sqq.; I Νομοφύλακες di Cirene; SEG 9, 131-5.
For examples elsewhere, DS II, 1483.
RAL6 I, p. 420; AE 1927, no. 142. The name of the proconsul Didius Gallus is incised on the architrave of the building; this man restored public land to the city of Ptolemais in A.D. 88 (cf. CR, p. 101). The Cyrene structure resembles the Tabularium at Rome, hence its proximity to the Nomophylakeion creates the impression that it served as a land-registry.
The signs of burning on the interior of the walls pass behind the pilasters, which were inserted at a secondary stage in the building’s history to support the walls. The placques recording the nomophylakes of the time of Augustus were incorporated into the pilasters. It is therefore logical to suppose that the conflagration that damaged the building occurred in the hellenistic period. This possibility is ignored by G. Madolle, Les cretales del Nomophylakion di Cirene, ASA A, 41-42, 1965, pp. 39 sqq.
Loc. cit., p. 427.
SEG 9, 1, 78-82.
TA, p. 95.
Loc. cit., pp. 427 sqq.
Oecon., IX, 14.
De legibus, III, 20, 46.
Polit., IV, 1298b.
Ibid. VI, 1323a.
A. H. M. Jones, The Greek City, 1940, p. 329.
Stucchi (Cirene, p. 170) publishes an inscription from the Agora (ibid. no. 23) which records an eponymous priest of Apollo and six ephors in the 3rd or 2nd century BC, instead of the usual five; this suggests an unusual situation which probably involved the city’s constitution.
Jones, op. cit., pp. 120-1; Griffiths, Tarn, HC pp. 123-5.
Jos., Ant. XVI, 6, 5 (169).
CIG 5186.
Plut., Luc., 2: Strabo ap. Jos., Ant., XIV, 7, 2 (114); see below pp. 202-3 sqq.
Ap. Ant., loc. cit. (115).
Ant., XVI, 6, 5 (169-70).
BJ VII, ix, 2 (445).
Despite the statements of some scholars, I do not think that there is specific evidence that the Jews of the Roman Empire enjoyed a general exemption in military service. Such exemption was given on several occasions in Asia Minor to Jews possessing Roman citizenship, and then in the special circumstances of civil war in the late republican period. The fewness of Jews from the Roman army in the ist and 2nd centuries AD was caused principally by political factors, and in the 3rd and 4th centuries they are found serving in the imperial forces. For some cases in the ist and 2nd centuries, see the author, The Katz Memorial Volume, (Commentationes ad Antiquitatem Classicam Perlinentes), 1970, pp. 3 sqq.; for my general views on the question, Roman Frontier Studies 1967, 1971, pp. 181 sqq.; The Jewish People in the First Century, ed. Safrai, Stern, 1974, I, pp. 458-60.
See p. 160.
CIG 5361.
SEG 17, 823; REG 72, 1959, pp. 275-6; pp.12, 1957, pp. r3 sqq.; BIES 25, 1965, pp. 167 sqq.
Ant. XVI, 6, x (160): “The cities had dealt evilly with the Jews...
Ant. XVI, 6, 5 (169).
XIV, 7, 2 (116).
28β gg p Petr. III, 14,17: ὁ δεῖνα Κυρηναῖος τῶν ἰοαίου σύνταγμα κληροῦχος. The other meanings of the word (political constitution, social class — F. Passow, Handwörterbuch der griechischen Sprache, 1857, ad voc.) are not appropriate in this context.
de Aedif., VI, 2 (B 334).
R. G. Goodchild, JRS 41, 1951, pp. n sqq.; Antiq. 25, 1951, pp. 132, 140, 143; GJ 118, 1952, p. 9.
Cf. the forms Thebais, Argolis and the like.
ASA A 39-40, 1961-2, p. 288, no. 166, fig. 88.
SEG 18, 738; Berytus, 12, 1958, pp. 115-6, no. 8.
CPJ III, no. 1442.
IEJ 7, 1957, pp. 157 sqq.; ct. Zion, 19, 1954, p. 43, no. 15 (Heb.).
R. Goodehild, Kyrene und Apollonia, pp. 163 sqq.
Stucchi, Cirene, p. 163; Agora di Cirene, I, p. 277; tav. xlv, 5b. Slouschz, My Travels in Libya (Heb., II, 227), saw a hill called Horeb el-Yahud to west of the city. According to the map of the route taken by him, however, (ibid., p. 230) this was southward, but all memory of the name appears to have vanished in the district, and I was unable to identify the site.
See p. 131.
Eg. the council-house of Miletus is near the Delpheion, that of Priene opposite the Temple of Zeus; the Bouleuterion in the Athenian agora in the 3rd century B.C. stood behind the temple of the Cybele.
See principally the introduction to Chap. IV, pp. 131 sqq.
For details, Tcherikover, Jews in Egypt, pp. 30-63; HCJ, pp. 334 sqq.; CPJ I, pp. 147 sqq.
Acts, 2: 10.
Eus., HE, IV, 2, 2,
Ant. XVI, 6, 1 (160).
SEG 9, 8, 36.
Polyb. XV, 25, 12: Λιβυάρχην τῶν κατὰ Κυρήνην τόπων.
IG II, 3407.
ΑΑ 1962 (iii), ρ. 437, f. ii; and see here pp. 63-4 and p. 203, n. 3.
Cited by Goodchild, Kyr. u. Apoll., p. 31, n. 33.
Γιδ΄ Τερτία Ἰώσητος (ἔτων) μ΄ Ἰώσης (ἔτων) κε΄. I am indebted to Miss Joyce Reynolds for information on this inscription and its text.
Παρατομὴ Μαγδαλειτῶν: NV I, 35: IV, 12/15; Ptol. IV, 5: Μασαδαλίς.
Jerem., 44:1; P. Würz. inv. 5; P. Ent., 23; Tcherikover, Jews in Egypt, pp. 14, 19, 22; CPJ I, p. 4, n. 12.
CIJ I, 673, 13.
NV VI, 28/30.
Ibid.
See above; SEG 9, 703, and cf. the destruction of the temple south of el-Dab’ah in Marmarica in the rebellion of 115-7 — see p. 290.
Synes., Ep. 6; Migne PG 66, col. 1544, vi, para. 169.
Professor Slouschz saw menorot incised on rockcut tombs at Messa (K. Friedmann, Misc. Stud... Chajes, p. 47). Near Lamluda he recorded a Hebrew inscription “Simon Samuel” (op. cit., p. 47, no. 11); one of my Italian antiquities workers told me of the discovery of a Hebrew inscription at the same site, and showed me where it was found, but nothing is now to be seen. G. Narducci claimed to have seen Jewish antiquities at Driana (near the ancient Hadrianopolis) but could not remember their character. Hypogaea exist in this vicinity, one with the inscription Λυκύ[ας], a very common name among Jews in Cyrene. (AJA 17, 1913, p. 183, no. 70; at Apollonia; SEG g, 624 and JHS 28, 1908, p. 199, no. 36 at Teucheira; Zion, 19. 1954, p. 42, no. 7, at Cyrene; cf. Eus. HE IV, 2).
Goodchild, GJ 118, 1952, p. 146.
Herod. IV, 164, 4.
CIG 5147; cf. BMC, pp. clxiv; clxxxi.
Muller, FHG, III, para. 209.
Les siècles obscurs du Maghreb, 1927, pp. 201 sqq.
Ibn Khaldoun, History of the Berbers, trans. de Slane, 1852-6, I, p. 168.
Op. cit., I, p. 208.
Ibid., pp. 170 sq.; 226 sq.
Gautier, op. cit., p. 204.
Ibn Khaldoun, op. cit., p. 232; cf. ibid. Appendix, I, p. 301.
Op. cit., p. 201.
N. Slouschz, Hébréo-Phéniciens et Judéo-Berbères, 1908, p. 463.
M. Avi-Yonah, Palestine and Near East Economic Magazine, 14 (i), p. 11.
ZDPV 56, 1933, p. 180; plan xii.
W. F. Petrie, Egypt and Israel, pp. 102 sq.
Jerem. 43:8-9; Petrie, op. cit., p. 91.
The inscription has been published, but not quite accurately, by Gray,
Slouschz, My Travels, II, p. 221.
Jordanes, Romana, 81 (Mommsen, MGH V, p. 9); CAH IX, p. 433, n. 1; CPJ I, p. 25.
Ap. Jos. Ant. XIV, 7, 2 (114): “The same Strabo testifies... that at the time that Sulla crossed to Greece to wage war against Mithradates and sent Lucullus against the rising (ἐπὶ τὴν στάσιν) of our people of whom (which?) the world is (was?) full, he said” etc. (Vers. Lat.:... quia tempore quo transiit Sulla in Hellada pugnaturus Mithradati Lucullum transmisse fertur in Cyrenen civitatem propter nostrae gentis seditionem, quae totam orbem complevit). The text of the sentence mentioning the stasis is corrupt, (Niese, FI. Jos. Operae, ad loc., III, 1955, p. 260), but I think that the word ἐπί is decisive. The primary meaning of the word seditio in the Latin version is “rebellion”.
AA 1962, p. 437; from the Valley Street of Cyrene: Αἰγλάνορα Δαματρίω Κυραναίον τὸν συγγένη τῶ βασιλεύσαντος ἁμῶν Πτολεμαίω τὰ μέγιστα εὐέργήσαντα τὰν πατρίδα καὶ τὰς ἄλλας πόλιας καὶ τὰ κατὰ τὰν χώραν ἔθνεα Κυραναῖοι.
Plut., Luc. 2:4; Aelianus, Var. hist., XII, 30, 5.
JUS 17, 1927, pp. 141 sqq.
Plin., HN XIX, 3, 15 (140).
SEG 9, 354; DAI II, Cir. i, no. 135. The Arabic name of the settlement preserves, ί believe, the Greek name which appears in Ptolemy’s Geography (IV, 4, 7) in this neighbourhood as Ἀρχίλη.
JEA 6, 1920, p. 175; Rostovtzeff, A Large Estate, pp. 90 etc.; C. Préaux, L’économie royale des Lagides, 1939, p. 141.
In Verrem, II, 3, 63.
Rostovtzeff, JEA 6, 1920, p. 175; C. C. Edgar, P. Zenon, 59723.
This was the situation, at least, in Egypt.
Rostovtzeff, Stud. z. Gesch. römischen Kolonates, 1910, pp. 131, n. 1.
(Silphium) publicani, qui pascua conducunt, maius ita lucrum sentientes, depopulantur pecorum pabulo. — Plin. HN, XIX, 3, 15 (39).
de leg. ag. II, 19, 51.
W. Capelle, RM² 97, 1954, pp. 185-6.
Badian (JRS 55, 1965, pp. 119-20) is not certain that Cyrene was definitely under direct Roman rule before 63 B.C.; Oost (Clas. Phil., 58, 1965, p. 19) accepts the establishment of Roman government in 75-74 BC.
Reynolds, JRS 52, 1962, p. 98, no. 4.
Hist. II, frag. 43.
Reynolds, loc. cit., pp. 99-100, no. 5.
Caes., B. Civ., III, 5.
RAL 1, 1925, p. 421, fig. 9, line 13.
Tac., Ann. XIV, 18, 2.
Tacitus here uses the words “proximus quisque possessor”, an expression also found in the professional surveyors’ literature (eg. Hyg., de cond. ag. (Thulin) p. 79 (Lachmann, p. 116). The word possessor frequently means “tenant” (cf. Rostovtzeff, Stud. Gesch. rom. Kol., pp. 317, 341), hence it may be conjectured that Tacitus had before him some official report of the episode concerned, and that other tenants of the ager publicus had invaded vacant lots. But it might be doubted whether Tacitus was here using the term in its exact juridical significance.
On flock transhumance, see C. Yeo, Tr. Amer. Philol. Assoc., 79, 1948, pp. 275 sqq.; P. A. Brunt, Italian Manpower, 1971. pp. 371-3 sqq. with special regard to Luceria, Calabria and Apulia. He points out that here transhumance had been made practicable by the confiscation of land, and had rendered impossible the recovery of the population. Its practice was here closely bound up with the public lands, and with grain-production — a branch in which the large landowners of Cyrene were interested.
Hyg., de cond. agrorum (Lachmann), 116; Rostovtzeff, Gesch. der römischen Staatspacht, 1904, pp. 422-6.
ubi publicanus esset ibi aut ius publicum vanum aut libertatem socus nullam esse — Liv. XLV, 18, 4.
Rostovtzeff, Staatspacht, pp.410-11; cf. CIL III, 1209, 1363; IX, 243.8
Tac., Ann. XIV, 18: missum disceptatorem a Claudio agroram quos etc.
Loc. cit.: Nero, probata Strabonis sententia se nihilo minus subvenisse sociis et ursurpata concedere scripsit.
Plin., Epp. 2, 11; cf. Furneaux, The Annals of Tacitus, 1907, I, pp. 3-4.
L’arbitrate publico, 1893, p. 345; cf. Oliverio, DAI II, Cir. i, pp. 128-23.
A judicial dispute which is likely to throw light on the Cyrenean problem is reflected in an inscription from the town of Aezani in Phrygia (C/L III, 355; OGIS 502; F. F. Abbott, A. C. Johnson, Municipal Administration in the Roman Empire, 1926, pp. 403 sq., no. 82). The lands of the Temple of Zeus here had been appropriated by one of the Hellenistic rulers and divided out among cleruchs. Under Hadrian it was found that part of the tenants had enlarged their plots at the expense of others, and regarded their land as completely theirs. It appears that they owed rent both to the city of Aezani and to the emperor, hence, after a prolonged conflict (πολυχρόνιος μάχη), the city had appealed to the Roman governor, and the case ultimately came before the emperor himself. Hadrian, in his reply to the governor’s communication, instructs, that if it proves impossible to ascertain the size of the original plots, the governor must find out the average size of similar plots in the neighbouring cities, and redraw the boundaries at Aezani accordingly. The tenants must pay vectigal (τέλος) to the city; the governor also sends instructions to the local procurator of the emperor to find surveyors to complete the enquiry, and the procurator replies that for this he needs experienced specialists (eos qui usu sint eorum periti).
Oliverio (loc. cit.) thought that Nero forewent arrears of rent, but there is no evidence of this.
de cond. ag. 122-3: Lapides vero inscripti nomine divi Vespasiani sub clausula tali: occupati a privatis — P. R. restituit.
SEG 9, 352; DAI II, Cir. i, p. 129, no. 137. The third, which I have seen personally, is fragmentary.
Fines occupatos a privatis P.R. restituit-ὄρους δικαατεχομένους ὑπὸ, ἰδιωτῶν δημῷ Ῥωμαίων ἀποκατέστησεν.
DAI II, Cir. ii, p. 133, no. 138; NAMC 2, 1916, pp. 165 sqq.; SEG 9, 165, 166, 167; FA 9, 1956, 3802 (p. 281).
Aegyptus 4, 1918, p. 164.
SEHRE p. 681, n. 64; cf. SIG³ 463.
Ghislanzoni, NAMC 2, p. 173; CR, p. 103 n.
Ghislanzoni, loc. cit.
Cf. NAMC 2, p. 173, 177 n.; SEG 9, 166.
DAI II, Cir. i, pp. 132-3. no. 138; SEG 9, 360.
Loc. cit.
PW XXV, 1926, sv. Limitatio, col. 674: The use of Ptolemaic units of measurement and Hyginus’ language (lapides vero divi Vespasiani) perhaps point to the earlier date.
Neque hoc praetermittam, quod in provincia Cyrenensium conperi...
For Limitatio (centuriation) see Blume, Lachmann, Rudorff, Die Schrifte der römischen Feldmesser, 1848; A. Schulten, BJ 103, 1894, pp. 12-41; W. Barthel, ib. 120, 1911, pp. 39-125; PW XXV, 1926, sv. Limitatio, (Fabricius); J. P. S. Bradford, Antiq. 21, 1947, pp. 197 sqq.; 23, 1949, pp. 65 sqq.; C. E. Stevens, Antiq. 32, 1958, pp. 25 sqq.; Ministère des travaux publiques (Tunisie), Atlas des centuriations romaines de Tunisie, 1954; J. P. S. Bradford, Ancient Landscapes, 1957, Ch. iv, pp. 145 sqq.; R. Cheval-lier, BCH, 82, 1958, p. 636; id. Hommages à Albert Grenier, ed. Renard, 1962, (Collections Latomus, 58), pp. 403 sqq.; Notes sur trois centuriations romaines, Bononia, Ammaedara,Vienna; Bibliothéque genérate de l’école pratique des hautes études, 6, Colloque international d’archéologie aérienne, 1964: M. Guy, L’apport de la photographie aérienne a l’étude de la colonisation antique de la Province de Narbonnaise, pp. 117 sqq.; Gymnasium, Beih. 7: Germania Romana, III: Römisches Leben auf Germanischem Boden, ed. H. Hinz, 1970, pp. 26-42, Die Landwirtschaftliche Grundlage der Villae Rus-ticae, with extensive further literature; O. A. W. Dilke, The Roman Land-surveyors, 1972.
For areas of Limitatio in Africa in which the tree pits of the olive-plantations are clearly visible, Bradford, Ancient Landscapes, pl. 49, a-b, and p. 204.
Bradford, ibid., pp. 154, 203.
The clearest sketch of this development is still that of F. Pelham, Essays in Roman History, 1911, pp. 275 sqq.
Rostovtzeff, Kolonat, p. 328.
Blumeetal., Die Schrifte, pp. 211, 261.
Hyg., de gen. controv., Lachmann, p. 133.
Ant. XIV, 7, 2 (116).
N. Avigad, IEJ 12, 1962, pp. 1 sqq: A depository of inscribed ossuaries in the Kidron Valley. Professor Avigad decided for the Cyrenean origin of the people buried here on the strength of the words “Alexander the QRNYT” (sic) incised on one of the ossuaries (no. 8), and of the general composition of the names, most of which are to be found in the onomasticon of Cyrenean Jews. To these indications another may be added, namely the spelling of the word Πτυλιμαϊκὴ (sic) on no. 7a, which is peculiar to Cyrene, where the upsilon frequently takes the place of the omicron — cf. here p. 213. In connection with relations between Judaea and Cyrene, we may mention the names of the proselyte Batti ben Tebbi, (Tobiah) the slave of the younger Rabban Gamliel (Qiddushin, 70b). Batti may be a form of the Cyrenean “Battus”, cf. ’Azariah di Fano’s remark concerning this proselyte, that he was derived from Ham. The name Tobiah is found among the names of the Jews of Teucheira (Gray, MUC, no. 24), and cf. Βαρθύβας, which occurs four times on the Cyrene stele QAL 4, 1961, p. 20, nos. 7, 34, 37, 47 (A.D. 3/4).
P. B. Bagatti, J. T. Milik, Gli Scavi del “Dominus Flevit”, I, 1955, p. 81, no. 9, Vanno 74, Oss. 10.
Acts, 10:9.
Matt. 27:32; cf. Acts 3:1 etc.: Λούκιος ὁ Κυρηναῖος.
Jos., BJ VI, 2, 2 (114).
Ant. XVIII, 2, 2 (34).
Ant. XX, 8, 8; 8, 11 (180-1, 194-6).
B. Pes. 57a.
Ant. XVIII, 8, 11 (195).
DS sv. Poena, pp. 539-40.
SEG 9, 360.
Jos., BJ VII, 6, 6 (218).
CPJ I, 1957, p. 80.
Jos., Vita, 76 (424); BJ VII, 11, 1 (437) sq.
Ἥψατο δὲ καὶ τῶν περὶ Κυρήνην ἡ τῶν σικαρίων ἀπόνοια καθάπερ νόσος. Cf. P. Lon. (CPJ, no. 153). 1912, 98-100; εἰ δὲ μή, πάντα τρόπον αὐτοῶς ἐπεξελεὑσομαι καθάπερ κοινὴν τείνα τῆς οἰκουμένης νόσον ἐξεγείροντας.
For the identity of this governor see Ritterling, JRS 17, 1927, p. 29: he was L. Valerius Catullus Messalinus, consul for 73 (PW XIV, 1948, col. 2411, sv. Valerius no. 127). Under Domitian he was a member of the emperor’s council and much feared as an informer.
καὶ ταῦτα πρἀττειν ἐνόμιζεν ἀσφάλως, ὁτὶ τὰς οὖσίας αὐτῶν εἰς τὰς τοῦ Καισάρος προσόδους ἀνελάμβανεν.
Jos., Vita, 76 (424).
J. Klausner, Hist. of the Second Temple, V, 1951. p. 168, note 5 (Hebrew).
BJ II, 13, 5 (261-3); cf. Acts 21:38; Eus., HE II, 21.
Ant. XX, 5, 1 (97-8).
Some confirmation of this suggestion is perhaps to be found in the wording of Josephus, who writes: “After he (sc. Jonathan) had convinced two-thousand of the ἐγχώριοι”. The last word has two meanings, viz. “local people”, and “country-people”.
Suet., Vesp., 16.
Sola est, in qua merito culpetur, pecuniae cupiditas — Ibid.
Ibid., 16: Creditur etiam procuratorum rapacissimum quemque ad ampliora officia ex industria solitum promovere, quo locupletiores mox condemnaret; quibus quidem volgo pro spongiis dicebatur uti, quod quasi et siccos madefaceret et exprimerit umentis.
Vesp. 15: Non temere quis punitus insons reperiatur nisi absente eo et ignaro aut certe invito atque decepto.
Jos., BJ VIII, 10, 1 (407).
It is interesting that Josephus’ words can be interpreted to mean that the property had been confiscated before the execution of its owners.
Lib. Ant., 2, 1965, pp. 103 sqq.
BJ II, 13, 4 (258-9).
Y. Yadin. The Scroll of the War of the Sons of Light with the Sons of Darkness, 1957.
Y. Devir, Bar Kokhba, the Man and the Messiah and the Dead Sea Scrolls, 1964, especially Chapter II: “The Desert as a place of inspiration throughout the generations” (Heb.).
Compare the Rechabites, the sojourn of various prophets in the desert, the flight of the Maccabean brothers to the wilderness and similar. See further M. Hengel, Die Zeloten, 1961, pp. 225 sqq.; W. R. Farmer, Maccabees, Zealots and Josephus, 1956, pp. 116 sqq.
Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls (ed. Yadin, Rabin), 1961. pp. sqq... “The date and authorship of the Scroll of Light and Darkness.”
W. Marçais, Rev. critique d’histoire et de la litérature, 1929, p. 260; C. A. Julien, Hist. de l’Afr. du nord, II, 1952, pp. 22-4.
L’empire romain, 1939, p. 165.
M. Simon, Le Judaïsme berbère dans l’Afrique ancienne, ap. Recherches d’hist. Judéo-Chrétienne, 1962, p. 69.
Loc. cit., p. 69.
Jour, of African Hist., 4, 1963, pp. 313 sqq.: The problem of the Judaized Berbers.
See Hirschberg, loc. cit., p. 317, note 8.
Ibid., p. 338.
In eastern Cyrenaica, the name Βεῖσχα (see here p. 290); at Ptolemais the name Itthalammon son of Apella (p. 168).
Aladdeir — Ele’azar, see here p. 198, note.
Simon, Le Judaïsme etc., loc. cit. (note 91), p. 40.
Ant. I, 15 (239-241).
Jacoby, FGH, II, frag. 123.
Worlds Meet: Studies in the Situation of Jewry in the Greek and Roman World, 1960, pp. 60 sqq. (Heb.).
Augustini Ep. ad Rom. expos, inchoata, c. 13, — PL, Migne, 35, p. 2096.
Y. Guttman, Jewish Hellenistic Literature, II, 1963, pp. 9-69; 68 (Heb.).
Clemens Alex.; Stromata, I, 23, 155-6; PG 8, cols. 901-3.
Ant. I, 15 (238-9); cf. ibid. 240.
The analogy that suggests itself is the settlement of Hirbet Qumran. As to Cyrenaica itself, a historical parallel might be seen in the function of the “Zawiet” or settlements of the Order of the Sanusi during the war conducted by the Libyans against the Italian government in 1912-1931. The more important of these settlements were on the margin of the desert and also in the oases linked by the caravan routes. They were supported by contributions from the tribes and by trade; some of their supplies came from the occupied regions. It is important to emphasize that their existence was rendered possible by tribal support and by supplies from without. It should also be remembered that the Sanusis were first and foremost a m ove ment of the countryside. The rebel forces that fought the Italians and found their leadership in the Order, were supported by an underground of the inhabitants of the Plateau, who were outwardly reconciled to Italian rule. From these they derived arms and manpower; among them they rested and recovered from their wounds. (For an account of these circumstances, see E. Evans Pritchard, The Sanusi of Cyrenaica, 1949, pp. 50 sqq.). This analogy informs us that a rebellion organized on the desert margin, particularly in ancient times, and probably without the aid of the camel, which only ap peared west of the Nile valley at the end of the 2nd century A.D., required the cooperation of the tribes inhabiting the desert margins and of the settled population of the fertile areas. Yet for all the suggestive value of the analogy concerned, any conclusion based on such vis-à-vis the character of the development of the Jewish rising in Cyrenaica, remains conjectural in the absence of archaeological research on the relevant desert margins. Nor should it be forgotten that Roman garrisons were stationed at several key-points of the desert such as the Oases of el-Behneseh, Hargiyeh and ed-Dahliyeh. (For details, see J. Lesquier, L’armée romaine de l’Égypte, 1918, II, pp. 412-17). The period of the occupation of some of these stations is unknown, but 1st-century inscriptions are known at el-Dahliyeh and el-H argiyeh; an inscription of Trajan’s time has been found near the latter oasis. (AD 107). A Roman fort let at Nedurah, between the above two oases, was built under Hadrian or Antoninus Pius, and Gasr az-Zayyin south of el-Hargiyeh, was restored in 157. Im portant in pari materia is the inscription from the fortified temple at Kissos, (Gasr ed-Dush) in the Hargiyeh oasis, which records the building of its pylon in 116, and the completion of the work between April and M ay of that year (OGTS 677 — Liθ΄ Αύτοκράτορος Τραιανοῦ Πάχων α΄, and cf. JRS 21, 1931, p. 6). The absence here of the title “Parthicus” is explained by Longden (ibid.) as owing to the Jewish revolt, which had interfered with the transmission of news along the desert routes.
N. Slouschz, The Jewish Dispersion of North Africa, 1946, p. 29. (Heb.).
A. Neubauer, Mediaeval Jewish Chronicles, I, 1887, p. 190 — Mid. Lam. I, 31; Sepher le-Yuhsin le-R.A. Zakkut.
K. Miller, 1962, VIII, 1; cf. p. 15.
65.1.
IV, 3, 11.
Stadiasmus (Müller), 87; Strabo, XVII, 3, 20 (836).
The catacomb epitaph at Rome (CIJ I, 7) recording a grammateus of the Σεκηνοί, has been thought to refer to Iscina, but this is far from certain (cf. H. J. Leon, The Jews of Ancient Rome, 1960, pp. 149-51). For a new suggestion, that the reference is to the island of Sikinos in the Aegean, see now Applebaum, The Jewish People in the First Centurv, II, 1977, p. 720.
T. Mommsen, Provinces of the Roman Empire, I, 1909, pp. 306-7, n. 1; JRS 3, 1913, p. 120; Plin, HN, IV, 11, 47.
IGR IV, 991. 992.
Schriften der römischen Feldmesser, p. 211.
Ibid., Liber coloniarum, I, p. 230.
RetJ, 44, 1902, p. 7; A. Merigli, La Tripolitania antica, I, 1940, p. 212 n.: “Non è improbabile che fomentassero la rivolta (sc. dei Nasamones) gli Ebrei immigrati nella Sirtica in seguito alia repressione della sommossa scoppiato in Cirenaica l’anno 72 d. Chr.”
Cf. in the same period the settlement by Vespasian of opponents of the great revolt at Yavneh, which was an imperial estate (B. Gitt. 56b; Jos. BJ IV, 81 (444); Ant. XVIII, 2, 2 (31).
Ulp. Dig. L, 16, 27 (Mommsen, CIC, I, 910).
Bruns, Fontes Iuris. Rom. 1, no. 11 (m BC).
A. Grenier, Manuel d’archéologie gallo-romaine, VI, ii, 1936, pp. 730-32; CIL XII, 1524.
I. A. Richmond in Archaeologia, 93, 1959, p. 15; cf. Cosmographus Ravennas, (Schnetz) paras. 228-35 — ibid. p. 19.
AI 2, p. 200.
Loc. cit.
P. J. Mesnage, Le Christianisme en Afrique, 1914, p. 11.
See Applebaum, Prologomena to the Study of the Second Jewish Revolt, (132-5), 1976, pp. 10-12.
Jos., BJ VII, 6, 6 (216-7); not ager publicus, as stated by Alon, Hist.
Palastinensische Studien, I, 1923, pp. 10 sqq.; Alon, op. cit., p. 37; Applebaum, Prologomena, loc. cit. (n. 127).
Mid. Tannaim (Hoffmann), pp. 224, 317; the full evidence will be found in Applebaum, Prologomena (n.117), pp. 10-11; id., Aufstieg und Nieder-gang der römischen Welt, II, 8: The countryside as a political and economic factor 1979. pp. 289-94.
Friedmann, 352, p. 149.
Hoffmann, p. 224.
IEJ 12, 1962, p. 258; CIL III, 4-5; Supp. 14149; Dessau, ILS, 5834.
Cf. Aurelius Victor, Epit. de Caes., 42.21: cuius (sc. Traianus) procurators cum provincias calumniis agitarent...
The rebellion of the Nasamones noted here in n. 118 (A.D. 85 — Jos., BJ II, 16, 4 (381); Eus., Chron., ann. 2101) may well have been a symptom of what was to occur in the area at a later date. See here n. 118.
Fossatum Africae: Recherches aériennes de l’organisation des confins sahariens a l’époque romaine, 1949.
Baradez, op. cit., pp. 100-104; 359-63; The Congress of Roman Frontier Studies, 1949, ed. Birley, 1952, pp. 18-19.
IEJ 7, 1957, pp. 157 sqq.; Eretz Yisrael (Narkis Memorial Volume), 6, 1960, pp. 73 sqq. (Heb.-Eng. résumé).
Stucchi, Cirene, 1957-66, 1967, p. 163; L’agora de Cirene, 1965, I, pp. 217, 237.
O. Bronner, Corinth IV, (ii), 1930, Terracotta Lamps, pl. x, xii, Types xxv, xxvii, and pp. 83, 90, 182; H. B. Walters, Catalogue of Greek and Roman Lamps in the British Museum, 1914, eg. no. 787; cf. H. Goldman, Excavations at Gozlu Kule, Tarsus, I, 1950, p. 115, Group xvi, Class B, no. 203.
G. R. Wright, Excavations at Tocra, PEJ 1963, pp. 28 sqq.
Walters, op. cit., nos. 1059, 1125.
Ibid. 1065.
J. Iliffe, Imperial Art in Transjordan, QDAP, 11, 1945, pp. 1-26., pl. viii-ix, nos. 134-6, 114-5.
H. M. D. Parker, The Roman Legions, 1958, p. 162. But see now Keppie, Latomus, 32, 1973, p. 862.
A. Reinfenberg, Judische Lampen, JPOS 16, 1936, pp. 166-79.
On coins of Antigonus Matthias, (40-37 B.C.), and on the walls of the Jewish rockcut tomb in Alfasi Street, western Jerusalem (IEJ 6, 1956, pp. 127-8). The finds in the tomb were dated between the 2nd century BC and the ist century AD, and nothing was found later than the reign of Tiberius.
PEJ 1963, p. 54 — “Tomb A”; Bull. Amer. Arch. Inst. 2, 1911, p. 57, pl. ii.
DAI I, Cir. i, 1933, p. 169.
Cf. Zion, 19, 1959, p. 26, n. 16. (Heb.).
SEG 9, 252; JRS 40, 1950, p. 89, D/4.
The confrontation of a menorah with the inscription “Victoria Augusta” among the rock cuttings in Wadi Umm Sidera in south Sinai (Rothenberg, in Roman Frontier Studies 1967, 1971, p. 221, fig. 109) might well belong to the time of Trajan. For the development of the imperial Victory cult in his reign, see J. Beaujeu, La religion romaine à l’apogée de l’empire, I, 1955, pp. 58-64.
Walters, op. cit., no. 780.
Ibid., no. 788.
Ibid., no. 1016.
Walters, op. cit., no. 780; Dessau, ILS 8613.
Hammond, BASOR, 146, 1957, pp. 10-13.
Dressel, CIL XV, p. 784; 6194-6220.
Walters, op. cit., nos. 649-652; Dressel, ibid., p. 786.
S. Loeschke, Katalog der Lampen aus Vindonissa, 1919, no. 386.
See n. 156.
For both groups of coins see C. H. V. Sutherland, Coinage in Roman Imperial Policy, 31 B.C. — 68 A.D., 1951, pp. 37, 47.
H. Cohen, Description historique des Monnaies Impériales, 1880, I, no. 275 (Vespasian, p. 388).
A. Héron de Villefosse, Monuments Piot, V, 1889 sqq., pp. 180 sqq., fig. 44; M. Rostovtzeff, SEHRE, 1957, pl. xviii, 2 and p. 132.
H. Th. Bossert, Geschichle des Kunstgewerbes, IV, 1930, p. 275. The lamp is the work of the potter Primus, who worked in Greece in the ist and 2nd centuries of the present era, although he came from Italy. (O. Bronneer, Corinth IV, 1930, ii, p. 97; CIL XV, 6684, 6784; Loeschke, op. cit.. p. 248; Walters, op. cit., p. xxxvi). The lamp with face surrounded with leaf-motifs is among his products. One of his lamps, of 2nd-century date, bears the figure of Zeus enthroned (Walters, op. cit., no. 1204).
D. Sourdel, Les cultes de Hauran à l’époque romaine, 1952, pp. 89 sqq.
Cf. R. Yohanan’s statement (Meg. 13a): “Every man who rejects idolatry may be termed a Jew”.
R. Vopel, Die Altkristliche Goldglaser, 1889; F. Neuberg, Glass in Antiquity, 1949, pp. 49 sqq.; E. R. Goodenough, Jewish Symbols in the Greco-Roman Period, II, 1953, pp. 108 sqq.
V. Sussmann, Ornamental Jewish Oil Lamps, 1972, (Heb.), pp. 32-3.
J. Juster, Les Juifs dans l’empire remain, 1,1914. pp. 223-4.
Cf. Juster, op. cit., I, p. 226. Juster saw the source of Jewish rights throughout the Empire in a political treaty, and accordingly believed that such a treaty remained uncancelled. For the difficulties affecting Juster’s view, see Applebaum, The Jewish People in the First Century, edd. Safrai, Stern, I, 1974, pp. 456-7.
H. I. Bell, Juden und Griecken in röomischen Alexandrien, 1925, p. 33; Appian, Syr., 50.
SRHJ II², 1952, p. 106.
SRHJ I², pp. 188 sqq.; CAII IX, p. 433.
U. Kalirstedt, Kulturgeschichte der römischen Kaiserzeit², 1958, p. 389; Juster, op. cit., I, p. 218, n. 3.
Kahrstedt, ibid., p. 387.
The picture was not uniform. We may record fraternal relationships at a critical testing time at Gerasa in Transjordan (Jos., BJ II, 18, 5 (479-80)) and at Scythopolis-Beth Shean (BJ II, 18, 3-466). Yet the latter episode also demonstrates the lack of stability of such relationships.
Milne, JRS 17, 1927, p. 6.
For Jewish merchants in Alexandria, see Tcherikover, The Jews in Egypt. pp. 63-6; CPJ I, pp. 49-50; Applebaum, The Jewish People in the First Century, II, 1977, pp. 706-7; and cf. Tell Edfou I, 1957, n. 141, P. Oxy. 276, — Jews engaged in grain transport. But the share of the Jewish ἔμποροι and ναύκληροι in the corn trade remains conjectural; Josephus (C. Ap., II, 5 (64) attributes to them a part in the administratio tritici, but I would regard this as an exaggeration, and in any case what there was, was abolished by Augustus (ibid.).
CPJ II, nos. 154-9.
“The Stoic teaching, indeed”, writes Syme (The Roman Revolution, 1952, p. 57) “was nothing more than a corroboration and theoretical defence of certain traditional virtues of the governing class in an aristocratic and republican state.”
On the question of the Cynic opposition and the Stoic current in the Flavian period and their influence in the cities of the eastern provinces, see Rostovtzeff, SEHRE, 1957, pp. 114 sqq.; cf. Applebaum, Studia Classica Israelica, I, 1974, pp. 119-23.
M. Hengel, Die Zeloten, 1961, pp. 97-8.
CPJ II, no. 153, 99-100. Cf. Oros. VII, 27, 6: tertia sub Traiano plaga Iudaeos excitavit; Acta Isid. (P. Berol. 8877 = CPJ II, no. 156c; 21-4: [σοὶ δὲ] Ἀγρίππα πρὸς ἃ εἰση[γεῖ περὶ Ἰου[δαίων] ἀντικαταστήσομαι. ένκ[αλῶ αὐτοῖς [ὁτι κ]αὶ ὅλην τήν οἰκουμένην [ἐπιχειροῦσιν ταράσ]σειν. (Musurillo, ΑΡM. 1954. iv, p. 23).
Dio LXVII, 14.
Arrian, Epictetus, 2.9.19-22.
Ibid. 4, 7, 6.
See Applebaum (n. 13), pp. 116 sq.
See Y. Lewi, Worlds Meet, 1960, pp. 115 sqq.
For denouncements of Roman oppression and exploitation, cf. the words of Rabban Gamliel (Avot de-R. Nathan, 28d) and the famous conversation between R. Judah and R. Simon (B. Shab. 33b).
cf. especially Morton Smith, Harvard Theological Review, 64, 1971, pp. 1 sqq.
Hengel, Die Zeloten, pp. 93-146.
Hengel, indeed, (ib. p. 137) was probably in error in assuming that all provincial lands were regarded as ager publicus when they were conquered. Many jurists, at any rate, do not see the imposition of tributum soli as indicating a claim of proprietorship before Claudius’ reign. For the discussion, cf. here n. 128 to Chap. V; fundamental are T. Frank, JRS 17, 1927, pp. 141 sqq.; A. H. M. Jones, JRS 31, 1941, pp. 26-31 = id. Studies in Roman Government and Law, 1960, pp. 143 sqq.
The Jewish World in the Time oj Jesus, (Eng. trans.), 1939, p. 40.
This defeat found expression in Claudius’ final decision recorded in CPJ II, no. 153.
Hengel, op. cit., p. 316.
Schürer, GJV, III, 1909, pp. 555-92; PW II² (IV), 1923, cols. 2117 sqq. sv. Sibyllinische Orakel (Rezach); R. H. Pfeiffer, A History of New Testament Times, 1949. pp. 226 sqq.
Klausner, The Messianic Idea in Israel, 1950. passim, and especially pp. 199, 213 sq. (Hebrew).
Hegesippus ap. Eus., HE, III, 20 (5), 32.
Ibid., 32 (3).
Or. Sib. II, 178-89.
Tac., Hist. V, 13; Jos., BJ VII, 5, 3 (312); H. Fuchs, Der geistige Widerstand gegen Rom in der antiken Welt, 1938, p. 62, n. 77.
Jos., Ant. XVIII, 1, 1 (5).
C. C. Torrey, The Apocryphal Literature³, 1948, pp. 116 sqq., 123 sqq.; R. H. Pfeiffer, Hist. NT Times, pp. 81 sqq.; 226; Schurer, GJV, 1909, III, pp. 305, 325, 327, 555-92; Klausner, The Messianic Idea, pp. 191, 201, 213.
Ap. R. H. Charles, Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament, 1913, (Box), XI, 40-43.
Ap. Charles, op. cit., p. 552; Pfeiffer too (Hist. NT Times, p. 84) believes that the text was supplemented and emended after the reign of Domitian.
Charles, op. cit., p. 478.
Ibid., xxxvi-xxxvii (p. 500).
Jos., BJ II, 17, 6 (427).
Die Zeloten, p. 136.
Jos., BJ IV, 3, 8 (155).
BJ II, 22, 2 (652).
BJ IV, 9, 3 (508).
BJ IV, 9, 3 (503-5).
See Chap. V, n. 85.
Millar Burrows, More Light on the Dead Sea Scrolls, 1958, p. 394, “The Rule of the Congregation”, col. i, para. 3.
Millar Burrows, The Dead Sea Scrolls of Saint Mark, II, 1951, pl. 1.
For a bibliography of the controversy, (to 1967), see Brandon, Jesus and the Zealots, 1967, pp. 61-2.
Perhaps a distinction ought to be made between the purely “internal” socialism of the Essenes, which possessed a “kibbutzic” significance, and the political revolutionary trend of Bar Giora’s men and those that thought like them. Yet it may be doubted whether in that period such a distinction existed. For the social equalitarian trend in contemporary Judaism, cf. Pirqei Avot, V, 13.
Ant. XVIII, 1, 6 (24).
Arrian, Diss., 4, 7, 6. Yet for doubts that Epictetus means the Galilean revolutionaries, see M. Stern, Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism, I. 1974. p. 541. n.
BJ VII, 10, I (407) sq.; VII, 11,1 (437) sq.
BJ II, 13, 15 (261-3).
CPJ I, 68,
BJ VII, xo, 1 (412).
L’armie romaine en Egypte, p. 24: “son charactfere rurale et fortement marque.”
The War of Bar Kokhba², pp. 22-3.
Rostovtzeff, SEHRE¹, p. 664, n. 32: “the national movement in Palestine, which was based almost wholly on the religious fanaticism and economic oppression of the peasants.”
Op. cit., p. 198.
Yadin, Masada, The First Season of Excavations, 1963-1964 (1965), pp. 103-15.
Eus., HE IV, 2, 2.
Oros. VII, 12.
Oros. VII, 12, 6.
A battle (μάχη) took place between Jews and Greeks in Alexandria in October, 115, and in this the Jews were the attackers (M. Boissacq, 1937, pp. 159 sqq.; Tcherikover, Jews in Egypt², p. 167), but this clash probably preceded the actual revolt — see here below, pp. 266 sq.
On these details, see Chapter VII.
Dio LXVIII, 32.
Eus. IV, 2, 4; Dio LXVIII, 32.
Eus. IV, 2, 4.
PO III, p. 986.
Jos., BJ II, 17, 9 (447).
Jos., BJ II, 55; Tac., Hist., V, 9.
BJ, loc. cit. (444): “He had gone up in state to pay his devotions, arrayed in royal robes.” (ἐσθήτί τε βασιλικὴ κεκοσμημένος).
See Chapter VII.
Ant. XVII, 6, 2 (149) sqq.; BJ I, 32, 2 (648).
Ant. XVIII, 3, i (55); BJ II, 9, 2-3 (169-72).
Jos., Vita, XII, (66-7).
Suidas, sv. ἐπίκλημα; cf. Longden, JRS 21, 1931, pp. 12 sq.
Suet., Nero, 57, 2.
Syme, Tacitus, 1958, I, 238.
CAH XI, 1954, pp. 104 sqq.
SEHHW, I, p. 346.
Much light on this consideration is shed, in my opinion, by certain phenomena of the 3rd century, which may be regarded as valid also in the time of Trajan. I refer to the messianic aspirations expressed in the frescos of the synagogue at Dura Europos (see here p. 322), and the words of Lam. Rabba, (I, 43): “If you see a Persian horse tied up in Israel, expect the footsteps of the Messiah.”
Syme, Tacitus, I, p. 222, n. 5; ILS 1035.
AE 1972 (1975). p. 178, no. 577; cf. Applebaum, Prolegomena to the Study of the Second Jewish Revolt, 1976, p. 77, n. 149a.
A. Negev, PEQ 1966, p. 96; IEJ 13, 1963, p. 121; 17, 1967, p. 46. For doubts and criticisms, Bowersock, JRS 61, 1971, p. 225.
IEJ 17, 1967, p. 54.
BJ IV, 8, 1 (450).
ILS 8970.
Plin. Paneg., 14, 1; Aur. Victor, Epit. 9, 12, De Cues., 9, 10; cf. CAH XI, 1936. p- 143.
Syme, Tacitus, I, 31.
Cf. Pliny on Trajan (Paneg. 25): Cognovisti per stipendia decem mores gentium, regionum situs, opportunitates locorum et diversam aquarum caelique temperiem, ut patrios fontes patriumque sidus ferre consuesti.
Plin. Paneg., 14, 1.
His council was mainly composed of “the heads of the military oligarchy” (Syme, Tacitus, p. 231). He was first and foremost “the candidate of the generals.”
P. Oxy. 1242; cf. H. A. Musurillo, A PM, 1954. pp. 162 sq.
APM, pp. 168 sqq.
Dig. 50, 2, 3, 3; Hieron., In Dan. 11:34-5 — PL 25, p. 595, para. 717; cf. Hist. Äug., Carac., I, 6; Sev. Alex. XXII, 4: Momigliano, Bib. Zeitschr., 1934, p. 406.
Jer., Sukk. V, 1, 55b; cf. Mid. Lam. Rabba, I, 16.
Syme, Tacitus, I, p. 232.
Syme, loc. cit.,; cf. Aur. Victor, Epit. de Caes., 42, 21.
Tcherikover, Jews in Egypt, Chap. 6; Tcherikover, Fuks, CPJ I, pp. 86-93; Fuks, JRS 51, 1961, pp. 98 sq.; Zion, 22, 1957, pp. 1 sqq.; Aegyptus, 33. 1953. pp. 131 sqq.
For the various views, Schurer, GJV, I, 1901, p. 663, n. 46; Vermes and Millar, Hist. of the Jewish People, I, 1973. p. 530. Of recent scholars, Longden (JRS 21,1931, pp. 6-7),Alon (Hist. of the Jewish People, I, p. 237), Tcherikover (Jews in Egypt, p. 161), Romanelli, CR, p. 113 n.) and Fuks (JRS 51, 1961, p. 100) date the rising to 115; Fuks places the outbreak at the beginning of the year. F. A. Lepper (Trajan’s Parthian War, 1948, pp. 91-2) came to no final conclusion. Vermes and Millar (I.e.) are for 115.
Eus., HE IV, 1: And now as the Emperor entered the eighteenth year (of his reign) another Jewish rising began etc.
Zion, 22, p. 2. (Heb.).
Mil. Boissacque, I, 1937, pp. 159 sqq.; Zion, ibid.; JRS 51, 1961, p. 100; CPJ I, no. 435.
JRS 51, p. 100.
Eus., Chron. II (Migne), 19, p. 554; Dio LXVIII, 32.
Eus., Chron. II, loc. cit.: Ἰουδαῖοι κατὰ Λιβύην καὶ Κυρήνην καὶ Αἴγυπτον καὶ Ἀλεξανδρίαν καὶ Θηβαΐδα πολεμήσαντες πρὸς τοὺς συνοικοῦντας Ἑλλήνας, διεφθαρέντας. Iudaei qui in Libya erant, adversum cohabitatores suos alienigenas dimicant. Similiter in Aegypto et in Alexandria. Apud Cyrenem quoque et in Thebaide magna seditione contendunt.
Vers. Arm., II, 164.
CPJ II, nos. 158a-b.
“And having extended the rebellion on a large scale, the following year they waged a considerable war... but in the city (sc. Alexandria) the Jews were hunted down and slain. And as the Jews of Cyrene had lost their allies, they ravaged the country areas of Egypt under the leadership of Lucuas.”
A Jewish epitaph from Teucheira dicussed in Zion, 22, 1957. pp. 84-5; SH 7, 1961, p. 32 and n. 26, appeared to show that there were still Jews at Teucheira in the year 116, but has now been reread by Miss Joyce Reynolds to date many years earlier (SEG 16, 887).
Tcherikover, Qedem, I, 1942, pp. 82 sqq. (Hebrew).
JRS 21, 1931, pp. 2-6; cf. CAH XI, 1936, pp. 858-9. Longden dated the event to the beginning of 115 despite Malalas’ information and in accordance with Xiphilinus, on the evidence of the death in the earthquake of the consul M. Pedo Vergilianus, whose name disappears from the inscriptions at the beginning of that year (JRS 21, p. 4).
Iudaei... toto orbe saevierunt absque magnis multarum urbium ruinis, quae crebri terrae motus isdem temporibus subruerunt.
IV, 140-43.
As suggested by G. Riccioti, The History of Israel, II, 1955, p. 449.
Opuscula Archeologica, VI, 1950, p. 32, no. 16; cf. Zion, 19, p. 39.
CRAI 1912, pp. 249-56.
SEG 20, 157 = AJA 65, 1961, 124/5.
VII, 12, 6: per totam Libyam (Iudaei) adversus incolas atrocissima bella... gesserunt: quae adeo tunc interfectis cultoribus desolata est, ut, nisi postea Hadrianus imperator collectis illuc aliunde colonias deduxisset, vacua penitus terra abraso habitatore mansisset.
Turk Tarik Belletin, ix, 1947, pp. 101-4, no. 19. Cf. Tac. Ann. XIV, 27, 4 on the settlement of legionary veterans together with their officers.
Tabula Peutingeriana, (Miller), VIII, 4.
R. G. Goodchild, GJ 118, 1952, p. 152.
Tab. Pent., VIII, 4, 5.
Cf. NV IX, 24/5 sqq.; Chor. Ravennas, 137, 13, 354, 1.
Cenopolis (Καινόπολις) — Ptol. IV, 6, 7.
See above, n. 49.
CIJ I, 673; cf. Zion, 19, p. 26, n. 29.
JEA 17, 1931, pp. 81 sqq.; and see below, p. 000.
CERP, p. 498.
IV, 4, 4.
XVII, 3, 22 (838).
HN V, 5 (5).
P. Romanelli, Rendic. Pontif. Accademia Montana di Archeologia, 16, 1940, pp. 215 sqq.
RAL 17, 1918, p. 356; AA 74, 1959, cols. 326 sqq.
NAMC 2, 1916, p. 66. On another stone of Hadrian’s reign, see below.
See end-map 6.
On the meaning of the word tumultus, see below, p. 302.
AI x, 1927, p. 321.
AI 1, p. 318; SEG 9, 252.
JRS 40, 1950, p. 89, D4.
AI 2, 1928, pp. 118-9; SEG 9, 168.
JRS 40, p. 89, D3.
M. Smallwood, JRS 42, 1952, pp. 37 sqq. I cf. 40, p. 89.
PBSR 26, 1958, pp. 31-3.
AI 3, 1930, pp. 161-4.
AI 3, p. 210; SEG 9, 190.
AI 3, pp. 193-6; SEG 9, 190.
AI 3, p. 196.
SEG 9, 186.
AI 1, p. 155.
NAMC 2, p. 12.
Pernier, TA pp. xox sqq.; 138 sqq.; S. Stucchi, QAL 4, 1961, pp. 71 sqq.
TA pp. 71 sqq.; 75.
We here follow the reanalysis of Stucchi (see n. 76), which emends the conclusions of Pernier.
All, pp. 142-3; TA p. 140.
SP no. 63, p. 42.
S. Ferri, Contributi di Cirene alia storia della religione greca, 1923, p. 5; SEG 9, 189.
Ferri, Contrib., p. 4/5, no. 3; SEG 9, 173.
SEG 9, 173.
AI 1, p. 145; TA p. 112.
AI 4, 1931, pp. 173 sqq.
AI 4, pp. 212 sq.; SP, p. 117, no. 33; Ferri, Contrib., pp. 5/7; SEG 9, 171.
The doubt arises with regard to the architectural style of the architrave carrying the inscription.
BCH 71-72, pp. 349 sqq.
On this building, Sichtermann, AA 1959, cols. 301-14, and subsequently, P. Mingazzini, L’insula di Giasone Magno a Cirene, 1966.
Stucchi, Cirene 1967-66, 1967, pp. 113-4.
AI 1, 1927, p. 322, fig. 7.
L. Moretti, Epigraphica, 31, 1969, pp. 139 sqq., evidently the first recorded man of the name Claudius Jason Magnus, (OGI 507 = I GRP IV, 576), archon of the Panhellenic Federation in 157.
AI 1, p. 335, no. 17; SEG 9, 172.
DA I II, Cir. ii, p. 266, no. 540; SEG 9, 175.
Goodchild, Kyrene u. Apollonia, p. 123, n. 25.
DAI II, Cir. ii, no. 539; SEG 9, 174.
Cf. TA p. 94.
Unpublished.
C. Anti, Teatri greci arcaici, 1947, pp. 122 sqq.
Bull. American Archaeological Institute, 2, 1910-11, pp. 141 sqq.
Ibid., p. 152.
AI 3, p. 150.
Stucchi, Cirene, p. 76.
S. Ferri, Dix années d’activite archéologique en Libye, 1924, p. 14.
Stucchi, op. cit., loc. cit.
Stucchi, L’agora, p. 247.
Stucchi, op. cit., p. 147.
Stucchi, op. cit., p. 241.
Stucchi, Cirene, pp. 54-5; L’agora, p. 251.
Stucchi, L’agora, p. 251.
Stucchi, Cirene, pp. 83-4.
Mingazzini disputes the building’s identification with the Capitol — see QAL 4, 1961, pp. xoi sqq.
J. B. Ward Perkins, PBSR 26, 1958, pp. 194 sqq.
SP p. 75.
SEG 9, 136.
Ἡ Κυρηναίων πόλις κοσμεισθεῖσα ὑπ’ αὐτοῦ καὶ τοῖς ἀγάλμασιν.
PBSR 226, 1958, pp. Ι94.
Goodchild, Cyrene and Apollonia, p. 46.
For the post-war excavation see AA 1959, cols. 301 sqq.; P. Mingazzini, L’insula di Giasone Magno a Cirene, 1966.
L’insula, pp. 16, 95.
Mingazzini, ibid., p. 95; Stucchi, Cirene, pp. no sq.
Isa Kyrene und Apollonia, 1971, p. 79; Lib. Antica, 3/4, 1966/7, p. 258.
Mingazzini, op. cit., p. 14.
Stucchi, Cirene, p. 113.
ASA A 29/30, p. 663.
Atti del Settimo Congresso Internationale del’Archeologia Classica, I, 1961, pp. 443, 447.
R. G. Goodchild, Kyrene und Apollonia, p. 90.
E. Sjöquist, Opuscula Romana, I, 1954, pp. 86-108; J. B. Ward Perkins, M. H. Ballance, PBSR, 26, 1958, pp. 137-94; Stucchi, Cirene, pp. 96 sqq.; Goodchild, Kyrene und Apollonia, pp. 71 sqq.; Gasperino, QAL, 6, 1971, pp. 3 sqq.
Stucchi, Cirene, pp. 96 sqq.
Gasperini, QAL 6, 1971, pp. 3 sqq.
Goodchild, ibid., Stucchi, ibid. (n. 128); JRS 42, 1952, p. 37, pl. viii; Gasperino, loc. cit., p. 15.
JRS 40, 1950, pp. 89-91, El; PBSR 26, pp. 161-2.
QAL 6, pp. 10-11, C5.
SEG 17, 804; JRS 40, p. 89, Di; 42, 1952, p. 37; PBSR 26, p. 162; QAL 6, pp. 10-11, B4.
AI 1, p. 318; AE 1964, no. 177; PBSR 26, p. 163.
JRS 40, 1950, p. 89, 1)2.
JRS 40, p. 88, A3; PBSR 26, p. 164; SEG 9, 54; a completion of the restoration by J. Robert, REG 73, 1960, pp. 207-8; SEG 17, 809; Gasperini, QAL 6, B5.
JRS 40, 1950, p. 89, 3 A-C.
QAL 6, C9.
PBSR 26, p. 167.
Ibid., p. 158.
Ibid., p. 167, cf. p. 194.
SP, ch. xi, pp. 71 sqq.
AI 1, pp. 3 sqq.
BCH 71-72, 1947-8, pp. 307-58; BSAA 39, 1951, pp. 83 sqq.
PBSR 26, 1958, pp. 30 sqq.; Stucchi, Lib. Ant., 5, 1966-7, pp. 199-201; Goodchild, Kyrene und Apollonia, pp. 154-5; QAL 6, 1971, pp. 116-21.
BCH 71-2, p. 353 n.
BCH loc. cit., pp. 349 sq.
R. G. Goodchild, J. M. Reynolds, C. J. Herington, PBSR, ibid..,
Goodchild, Kyrene und Apollonia, pp. 151 sqq.
AE 1954, no. 41; BSAA 39, p. 91, no. 5; PBSR 26, pp. 31-3.
AE 1954, no. 44; BSAA ibid. p. 95, no. 8; PBSR ibid. pp. 36-7.
AI, I, pp. 38-40 sqq.; SEG 9, 126.
PBSR ibid.
PBSR ibid., pp. 33-4.
My information is from an authoritative correspondent who saw the evidence personally.
Personal observation. Cf. Goodchild, Kyr. u. Ap., p. 152.
IG¹ II, 3306.
The date of the walls: J. P. Lauer, Rev. Arch., 1963, pp. 129 sqq.; Goodchild, Kyrene und Apollonia, p. 189; Hopkins, Pedley. White, Archeology, 19, 1966, pp. 56-7; 20, 1967, pp. 219-20; AJA 70, 1966, pp. 259-63; 71, 1967, pp. 141-7.
To west of the city a number of ancient field-plots are to be seen; although they are of irregular shape and area, they hinge on a straight central axis laid from north to south, suggesting that a mathematical, perhaps Roman, system of survey had been used. I know of no evidence at present of the date of this division.
Paus. II, 26, 9; Tab. Peut., VIII, 5.
RAJ. 27, 1918, pp. 356 sqq.
AA 74, 1959, cols. 325 sq.
AA 74, 1959, col. 334.
Ibid.
SEG 9, 347.
Goodchild, Lib. Ant., I, 1964, p. 144; 2, 1965, pp. 138-9; Boardman, Hayes, Excavations at Tocra, 1963-5 — BSA Supplementary Volume IV, 1966.
AI 4, 1931, p. 242; C. Kraeling, Ptolemais, City of the Pentapolis, 1962, p. 45. fig. 7.
E. F. Jomard, Description de I’Égypte, 1803, Atlas iv, pl. 54.
Procop., de Aedif., VI, 2, 4.
Strabo, IV, 7 (206); F. Haverfield, Ancient Town Planning, 1913, pp. 89-90; cf. Archaeological Journal, 103, 1947, pp. 66 sqq.
Tab. Pent., VIII, 4.
DAI II, Cir. ii, no. 168.
Orac. Sib. V, 195; where instead of Τέντυριν, Τεύχαριν should be read, according to the earlier mss.
Keen, Agric. Development, p. 32.
Vickers, JHS Archaeological Reports, 1971-2, p. 57.
A A 56, 1941, col. 702.
SB 5819; CIG III, 5328; CIL XIV, 2109; SEG 9, 399 (?); C. Kraeling, Ptolemais, p. 215, nos. 48-51; NAMC 1, p. 152, fig. 42. The last inscription belongs, I think, to a Jewish epitaph, although it looks later than the time of the rebellion.
JRS 40, 1950, p. 90, PI, 2.
Ibid, pp. 77 sqq. and see below pp. 293 sqq.
G. Pesce, II Palazzo delle Colonne in Tolemaide di Cirenaica, 1950.
Pesce, II Palazzo, pp. 104 sqq.; Ward Perkins differs (PBSR 26, 195. p. 194), and suggests that the building was erected in the Flavian period.
Since the above was written suspensurae of this type have been found in the baths at Masada, which belong approximately to the first half of the 1st century A.D.
Pesce, Palazzo, p. 92.
Unpublished.
G. W. Murray, JEA 17, 1931, pp. 81 sqq.
Hellenica XI-XII, 1960, pp. 569 sqq.
Henderson, Five Roman Emperors, 1927, pp. 214-24; CAH XI, 1936, pp. 210 sqq.; PW II, 1894, sv. Alimenta, 1484 sqq.; 1488.
ASA A 39-40, 1963, pp. 219-76, no. 68; p. 257 [39].
Eg. SEG 9, 128.
A white marble tombstone; the fifth line records: ἔτους σπβ τοῦ καὶ πρώτου.
P. M. Fraser, JRS 40, 1950. pp. 77 sqq., and see below p. 293.
Ibid. p. 87: “It will then be a copy of a Hadrianic inscription which had been damaged in some way, and of which it was felt desirable to make a copy.”
The most important of these would have been Thera, Rhodes, Samos, Tenos and the other Aegean cities; also those of Peloponnesos (more particularly Sparta, Elis and Mantinea) and Crete.
Cascellius Aristoteles who as priest (ἱερεύς καλλιέτης) signed the completion of the restoration of the Temple of Apollo in 181 (SEG 9, 173) was elected eponymous Patronomos of Sparta in approximately the middle of the 2nd century (BSA 43, 1948, pp. 258-9; IG V, 70, 1; 71, col. iii, 2). This appears to be a case of the migration of a wealthy citizen from overseas to Cyrene in response to the needs of the country after the Jewish revolt.
This federation or league was established by Hadrian in order to strengthen the hellenic spirit among the Greeks of the Empire. For its details, see M. N. Tod, JHS 42, 1922, pp. 173 sq.; P. Graindor, Athènes sous Hadrien, 1934, pp. 102-11.
Hesperia 20, 1951, pp. 31 sqq.
Classical Philology, 47, 1952, pp. 7 sqq.
IG 1,2, 3407.
Further fragments of this inscription have now been found, which include a letter from Antoninus Pius whose subject falls beyond the scope of the present book. (Goodchild, Kyrene u. Apoll., p. 43, n. 58).
Eus., HE, IV, 2, 3.
Eus. (Hieron.), Chron., (Helm), 97.
Hist. of the Jews of Eretz Yisrael, I, p. 246.
Eus., Chron. (Hieron.) ad ann. 2133 (PG 19, 555).
Jer., Sukkah, V, 58b.
Bell. Civ. II, 90.
Ann. Serv. Ant. Alex., 2, 1946 (2), pp. 62 sqq.; A. Rowe, PEQ 94, 1962, p. 139; also information from Mr A. Rowe. For a criticism of his conclusion, however, see J. Beaujeu, La religion romaine ὰ l’apogée de l’empire, I, 1955, pp. 230 sq., but he too admits that the present evidence allows no final dating.
Tcherikover, Jews in Egypt, pp. 161-2; CPJ I, p. 88, II, 225; Fuks, Aegyptus, 23, 1953, pp. 141 sqq.; JRS 51, 1961, p. 99; Zion, 22, 1957. pp. 4 sqq.
Reinach, TRJ no. 77 = Appian, frag. 19.
SHA Had. XIV, 4; Appian, B. Civ. II, 86; in II, 90 Appian seems to have confused the tomb with the Nemeseion outside Alexandria.
Appian. B. Civ. II, 86.
CPJ no. 448.
CPJ nos. 438, 439; Orac. Sib., V, 60-74.
CPJ no. 449.
CPJ no. 445.
CPJ nos. 445, 447, 450.
CPJ no. 445.
CPJ no. 443.
Eus., Chron. II (PG 19, 554), ann. 2131; vers. Ann., 164; Oros. VII, 12, 7; Syncellus, 347c!; Hieron., ad Chron. Eus., 196 (Helm).
CPJ nos. 436, 444.
Tcherikover, Qedem, I, 1942, p. 82. Here should also be mentioned a coin-hoard deposited under Trajan in the area of the Delta, evidently during the revolt. Out of a total of 267 coins, 66 were of Domitian, 24 of Nerva, and 138 of Trajan. The latest of the latter belonged to the years 114-117. (S. H. Webster, Numismatic Notes and Monographs, 54, 1932; S. Bolin, State and Currency in the Roman Empire to 300 A.D., 1958, p. 340, Table 3. Cf. JJS, 13, 1962, p. 42).
Eus., Chron. II (PG 19, 554), 164.
JRS 51, 1961, p. 99.
Dio LXVIII, 32.
Eus., Chron. II (PG, 19, 555); Hieron., ad Eus., 196; vers. Arm., 219; Syncellus, 348A.
JJS 13. 1962, pp. 41-2; cf. Alon, Hist. of the Jews, I, p. 241.
O. Vessberg, A. Westholm, Swedish Cyprus Expedition, IV, 195b, Part iii, p. 240.
Opuscula Archaeologica, 6, 1950, p. 89, no. 48.
IGR III, 989: Mitford, BSA 42, 1948, p. 212, n. 47.
V. Karageorghis, Sculptures from Salamis, I, 1961, no. 48, p. 48, pl. xliii.
Ibid., no. 65, p. 48; pl. liv, 5.
AJA 65, 1961, p. 123, no. 25.
AJA ibid.; IGR III, 934: τὀν σωτῆρα καὶ εὐεργέτην τ[οῦ κόσμου].
Εὐχὴ Ῥαββὶ Ἀττικοῦ — REJ 48, 1904, pp. 191 sqq. T. Reinach ascribes the column to the 3rd century CE, but the inscription includes an upsilon with a cross-bar, which is peculiar to the Severan period; cf. G. Hill, Hist. of Cyprus, I, 1940, p. 243, n. 1. This form appears at Cyrene as early as the reign of Hadrian.
Jos., Ant., XVI, 4, 5 (129).
REJ 61, 191 x, pp. 285 sq.; JPOS 12, 1932, p. 212.
JPOS ibid.
Dio, LXVIII, 32, 3.
Ant. XX, 2, 5 (51).
For Cypriotic produce eaten in Judaea see M. Nedarim IX, 8 (onions); Jer. Denial II, 22a (cummin).
CIL III (1), 215.
Excavations at Dura-Europos, Preliminary Report, Seventh and Eighth Seasons of Work, 1933-34 and 1934-35. Ed. Rostovtzeff, Brown and Welles, 1939. p. 129. no. 868.
Ibid., Fourth Season, ed. Baur, Rostovtzeff and Bellinger, 1933, pp. 56 sqq.; ibid., Sixth Season, ed. Rostovtzeff, Bellinger, Hopkins, Welles, 1936, pp. 480 sqq.
M. McDowell, Coins of Seleucia-on-Tigris, 1935, p. 233, n. 71; H. C. Debevoise, A Political History of Parthia, 1938, p. 236, n. 115.
M. Sota IX, 14; Seder Olam R., 30 (Neubauer, Seder Hakhamim, II, p. 66).
Cf. Yeivin, The War of Bar Kokhba², pp. 144-7; Alon, Hist. of the Jews, I, p. 256.
Alon, op. cit., p. 255. Smallwood, Ha, XI, 1962, p. 502.
Ibid. But on the possibility that Judaea became a consular province in 123, Pflaum, IEJ 19, 1969, pp. 225 sqq.; M. Avi-Yonah, IEJ 23, 1973, pp. 209 sqq. who places the change in 115/6; L. J. F. Keppie, Latomus, 32, 1973. pp. 859 sqq. Cf. also Applebaum, Prolegomena to the Second Jewish Revolt, 1976, pp. 19-20.
Dio LXVIII, 30, 3; Euseb., vers. Arm., 219; Call. Niceph. III, 22.
Vita Had., V, 2.
Ibid., pp. 256-7.
CIL III, 13587.
ILS 2727.
Hist. of the Jews, I, p. 258.
Rev. Bib., 1931, pp. 292-4.
Vita Had., V, 5, 8.
Cf. DAI II, Cir. ii, nos. 272, 480, 481, and especially NAMC II, pp. 173-177 n.
Alon, ibid., AE 1929, p. 45, no. 167.
QDAP 12, 1946, pp. 93-4; AE 1948, no. 148.
Ap. Bar Saliba, Sedlaede, Scriptores Syri, Cl, p. 17; cf. Hieron., Comment. Matth. XXIV, 15.
JJS 2, 1950, pp. 29 sq.; also Alon, op. cit., pp. 258-9. Cf. further Eutychius Ibn-Batrik, (PC III, 986-7), that “in the days of Trajan the Jews returned to Jerusalem”; see Alon, op. cit., p. 257.
Alon, op. cit., pp. 261-3.
B. Shah. 130a.
Tos. Kel. BB II, 2.
Alon, op. cit., pp. 262-3; Tos. Sofa, XIII, 4; cf. Sent. VIII, 7.+
Jer., Shev. IV, 35a.
Gregorii Abulfaragii, Historia Compendiosa Dynastiarum, 1663 (Pococke), p. 76.
Michaelus Syriacus, Chabot, IV, p. 105.
For the historians Michael Syriacus and Bar Hebraeus (Abulfaraj) see Baumstark, Gesch. der Syrischen Literatur, 1922, pp. 298, 312 sqq. Michael, who died at the end of the 12th century, wrote an Aramaic history that went down to the year 1194/5; he is extremely erudite and frequently cites earlier material now lost, although his model is Eusebius. Bar Hebraeus (13th century) was author of a Syriac chronography, largely dependent on Michael, but supplementing him and adding new material.
Siphre Emor, IX, 5 etc. (Alon, op. cit., I, p. 260, n. 169).
Jer., Ta’aniot, II, 66a; Jer., Meg. I, 70c.
Gen. Rab., par 64.8 (Theodor Albeck, p. 710).
Dio LXIX, 2; SHA Had., V; VII.
Smallwood, Ha, 11, 1962, p. 505.
Mid. Lam. R., I, 16; Baber, p. 80.
Siphra, Be-huqotai, V, 2.
Ibid.
See n. 272.
XXII, 9.
I Chron. 11:6.
Jer., Ta’an. IV, 69a.
Cf. Smallwood, Ha, ii, 1962, p. 502-3.
Mid. Lam. R., II, 69, Baber, p. 103.
Y. Kaplan, JQR, 54, 1963, p. 111; cf. IEJ 12, 1962, pp. 149-50.
Kaplan, loc. cit. But there is now evidence of trouble in Judaea in A.D. 107 (see AE 1972 (1975), no. 577) — ef. Applebaum, Prolegomena to the Study of the Second Jewish Revolt (A.D. 132-135), p. 77, n. 149a.
Cf. SEG 9, 2, 54, which furnishes evidence for the despatch of grain from Cyrene to ’Akko at the end of the 4th century B.C.E.; further the alleged influence of Jewish currency in Judaea on Cyrenean coinage in the 2nd and ist centuries B.C.E., which, if genuine, would be the result of the seizure of Jaffa by the Hasmoneans.
CIJ II, 1936, 950.
CIJ II, 905.
Alexandria — CIJ II, 918; JCPI 135, 141; Egypt — ibid. 137.
Jos., BJ II, 18, 10 (507); III, 9. 2-4 (414-430); cf. Kaplan, JQR 54, 1963, pp. 112-3.
See ref., n. 284.
With regard to the Libyan Jews buried at Jaffa, it would be logical to assume that in view of the annihilation of Cyrenean Jewry in Trajan’s time, they had reached Judaea before the revolt. Yet cf. Benoit et al., Mur abba’at, 1961, p. 218, no. 90c, 8 — Hillel of Cyrene, serving as a soldier in the forces of Ben Kosba.
From the epitaphs we learn of fishermen, linen-weavers, a wool-dresser, a trader in linen, a dealer in cummin, a rag dealer, and a simple labourer. The A cts of the Apostles (9:43) informs us of Simon the tanner.
BASOR 87, 1942, pp. 10 sqq.
Ibid., loc. cit.
Jos., BJ IV, 9, i (487-8).
BJ II, 18, 1 (458).
Ibid., II, 18, 5 (480).
Four general studies have been written on the Trajanic revolt. The first comprehensive scholarly account was by K. Friedmann in 1931 (SAI ns. 2, ii, 1931, pp. 108 sqq.: Le grande rebellione Giudaica sotto Traiano); a second account, including much material which had accumulated subsequently, was that of G. Alon, Hist. of the Jews, I, 1954, pp. 202 sTT A third, by the present writer, mainly concerning Cyrene, appeared in Zion 19, 1954, pp. 25 sqq. The fourth was that of A. Fuks, JRS 51, 1961, pp. 98 sqq.: Some aspects of the Jewish revolt in A.D. 115-117. Other general accounts have been written by P. Romanelli, CR 1943, pp. 113 sqq. and in CAH XI, 1936, pp. 246 sqq. Four studies have been devoted to the revolt in Egypt: A. Tcherikover, The Jews in Egypt in the Hellenistic Roman Age in the Light of the Papyri²., 1963, Chap. 6, pp. 160 sqq.; V. Tcherikover, A. Fuks, CPJ I, 1957, pp. 86-93; H> 1960, Section xi, pp. 228-60; A. Fuks, Aegyptus, 33, 1953, pp. 131 sqq.; cf. Zion. 22, 1957, pp. 1 sqq.; also H. A. Musurullo, APM, 1954, pp. 182 sqq. For a detailed bibliography down to 1954, see tlae present author, Zion 19; down to 1962, JJS 1962, pp. 36 sqq. Since then, Vermes, Millar, The Hist. of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ, I, 1973, pp. 529 sqq.: M. Smallwood, The Jews under Roman Rule from Pompey to Diocletian, 1976, Ch. XV, pp. 389-427.
Aegyptus, 33, 1953, pp. 1955-6.
P. Brem. 11, 30.
Ibid., 25-6.
P. Giss. 41, col. ii, 4-5.
BGU 889, 23; cf. SEG 9, 168 (restoration).
SEG 9, 168, 252; JRS 40, 1950, p. 89, P4.
Acta Pauli et Ant., col. ii, 3, 6; App., frag. 19; SEG 9, 189; P. Oxv. 705, c0l- ii, 331 Eus., HE IV, 2, 2; cf. Artem. Dald., Oneirokritika, IV, 24: ὁ πόλεμος ὁ Ἰουδαικὸς ἐν Κυρήνῃ.
Plut., Caes. 33.
CPJ II, no. 450.
VIII Philip., 1.
Cf. CIL II, 5439, 26 sqq.: Lex coloniae Genetivae Iuliae.
XXXIV, 56.
Totius Latinitatis Lexicon, 1805, ad voc.
Cf. T. Mommsen, Rom. Staalsrecht, 1887, I 3, p. 120; DS V, 532 sv. Tumultus.
CPJ II, no. 436 (= P. Giss. 19).
CPJ II, no. 438 (= P. Brem. 1).
Zion, 22, 1957. pp. 82 sqq.; E. B. Birley, Roman Britain and the Roman Army, 1953, pp. 23-4.
Diploma XVI, 5; Birley, op. cit., p. 22.
Goodchild, PBSR, 18, 1950, pp. 83-91; cf. Zion, 22, p. 83.
Tac., Ann. XIV, 18, 1.
Cf. Birley, op. cit., p. 23.
S. Frere, Britannia, 1967, pp. 120-123.
Frere, loc. cit.., Birley, op. cit., p. 24; R. G. Collingwood, J. N. L. Myres, Roman Britain and the English Settlements, 1937, p. 138.
H. M. Parker, The Roman Legions, 1958, p. 189.
IV, 24 (Hercher).
See also Zion, 22, 1957, pp. 82-4.
J. Lesquier, L’armée rom. d’Égypte, d’Auguste a Dioclétien, 1918, pp. 120-132.
The acting commander of the Egyptian legions, serving under the Praefectus Aegypti, his commander-in-chief, was the praefectus castrorum, but the former might actually take command, and did so on various occasions (DS IV, 1878-, p. 615), In a situation demanding a division of the forces on account of disorder in several different localities, the praefectus castrorum would have taken command of part of the available legionary force.
Adv. Hieron., 2:36 (Migne, PL 21, 392, col. 614); see G. R. Watson, JRS 42, 1952, pp. 56 sqq.: Theta nigrum.
Etymologiae, I, 24.
Ibid.
R. O. Fink, Roman Military Records on Papyrus, 1971, pp. 160 sqq., no. 34. For other examples of the use of θ to denote casualties in military lists, see Haris, Documenti per il essercito Romano in Egitto, 1964, p. 66 nn. Cf. also ILS II, 2, 7228, where the deceased members of the collegium of marble-workers at Luna (Carrara) are distinguished by the same letter.
As Trajan was “Imperator X” in December, 114, and his twentieth tribunicia potestas fell in January 115, the inscription belongs to 115 at latest.
CIL III, 13587.
CPJ II, no. 438 (= P. Bremen 1), 15-18.
Orac. Sib. XII, 326-8.
καὶ τρίτατος αὐτοῖσι κριὸς μέγας ἐκ Κυρήνης ὅν πρίν ἔλεξα φύγοντα μάχης παρὰ χεύμασι Νείλου. For further details and discussion on legions in Egypt during the revolt and casualties suffered by Roman military units at the time, see A. Kasher, Zion, 42, 1976, pp. 127 sqq. and here Summing Up, pp. 339, n. 457.
Herod. II, 42, 4; Lucan. IX, 545; Ovid., Met. V, 328 etc.
R. G. Fink, Roman Military Records (n. 331) pp. 160 sqq., no. 34.
op ot., pp. 277 sqq., no. 74.
J. F. Gilliam, Antiquitas, 4, Bd. 3, p. 96. For what evidence there is, see Kasher’s article, n. 36.
Ibid.
W. Wagner, Die Dislokation der römischen Auxiliarformationen in der Provinzen Norikum, Pannonien, Moesien u. Dakien, von Augustus bis Gal-lienus, 1938, pp. 150, 230.
Chron. II, 164 (Migne, PL 19, 554 (346-7)).
Not. Dig. Oriens (Seeck), pp. 6, 51; Latevculus Vevoviensis (Seeck, Not. Dig., p. 247), 3-4; Romanelli, CR, p. 135.
Ptol. IV, 5, 5; cf. Jones, CERP, pp. 300. 344.
See here Chap. V, n. 106, and cf. Kraeling, Ptolemais, p. 15, n. 16.
CPJ II, no. 436.
HE IV, 2.
CPJ II, no. 437 = P. Giss. 24.
Bell. Civ. II, 90: εἰς τὰς τοῦ πολέμου χρείας.
A. Rowe, PEQ 94, 1962, p. 139; cf. Bull. John Rylands Library, Manchester, 39, 1957, p. 496.
Rowe, PEQ 94, p. 139.
Ibid.
Tertullianus, Apol., 18: Hoc quoque a Iudaeis Ptolemaeo subscriptum est septuaginta et duobus interpretibus indultis... hodie apud Serapaeum Ptolemaei bibliothecae cum ipsis Hebraicis litteris exhibentur.
CPJ 11 no 439.
HE IV, 2, 4.
Cf. Orac. Sib. V, 60-74, which threatens the city because it “had encouraged evil in the hearts of the good”.
Eus., ibid. IV, 2, 4.
A. Stein, Die Prafekten von Ägypten in der römischen Kaiserzeit, 1950, pp. 59 sqq., considered Turbo was appointed Prefect of Egypt; cf. Fuks, Aegyptus, 33, 1953, pp. 151-2. But Syme (JRS 52, 1962, pp. 87 sqq.) has shown that the well-known inscription from Caesarea in Mauretania, AE 1946, no. 113 = CRAI 1945, pp. 144 sqq., does not concern the Marcius Turbo who suppressed the Jewish rising in Egypt and Cyrene, nor does he consider the latter’s appointment as prefect of Egypt probable, but thinks he was appointed to the Egyptian command in 116.
IV, 2, 4. In 114 Turbo commanded the classis praetoria which took Trajan to the east — CIL XVI, 60; AJA 1926, pp. 418 sq.
As suggested by C. G. Starr, The Roman Imperial Navy, 1960, p. 112.
On the fortress, JEA 4, 1917, pp. 174 sqq.; Antiq. 4, 1930, pp. 483 sqq.
The fortress generally resembles the fortresses of Odruh, el-Lejjun (Beth Horon) and e-Dumeh in Transjordan and Syria, which differ from the Diocletianic forts and those of the subsequent period in the number of their gateways and their internal arrangements. Ed-Dumeh has yielded an inscription of the time of L. Verus (AD 162) (R. E. Brunnow, A. von Domaszewski, Die Provincia Arabia, 1904-1909, III, p. 197); the Roman fort at ’Avdat appears to belong to the same type (plan, Rev. bib, 1904, pp. 404, 414), but Professor Negev b+elieved that it was not later than the early 2nd century AD, and recent excavation seems to have confirmed his opinion.
Johannes Nikiu (Zotenberg), LXXVII.
J. Ball, Egypt in the Classical Geographers, 1942, pp. 117, 130; Ptol. IV, 5, 23.
App., frag. 19 (Reinach, TRJ, no. 77).
Jos., BJ, I, 8, 7, (175): “(Antipater) persuaded the Jewish garrison guarding the estuaries at Pelusium to let Gabinius pass.“ (55 BC). It is to be noted that in the year 48 BC, when invading Egypt. Mithridates of Pergamum and Antipater capture Pelusium and seize Leontopolis (the military territory of the Jew Onias) and Memphis (BJ I, 9, 3-4 (189-91). The decisive battle for the Delta takes place at the Ἰουδαίων Στρατόπεδον.
CPJ II. no. 443 = P. Giss. 41; Aegyptus 33, 1953, p. 150.
SHA Had,. V, 8; VI, 7.
P. Oxy. 1023; Syme. JRS, 52, 1962, p. 87.
See p. 269.
SHA Had., IV, 6; Dio. LXVIII, 33 (2, 1).
Dio, LXIX, 1, 2; cf. JJS 2. 1950, p. 28.
Dio, LXIX, 2.
CIL III (i), 215.
For the political position of the Jews of Parthia see J. Neusner, Iranica Antiqua, III, 1963, pp. 51-6. Neusner sees in the internal political structure of Parthia factors inducing her rulers to accord a large measure of autonomy to the Jewish community. If this is correct, it might be reasonable to suppose that the Jews acted as a distinct and separate body in the rebellion of 116.
PW xxvi 1927, col. 1881, sv. Lusius Quietus (9).
Dio LXVIII, 32, 3; Eus. HE, IV, 2, 5; cf. Suda (Suidas), Adler, I, p. 400, sv. Ἀτασθαλία; IV, p. 53, sv. παρείκοι; Niceph. Call., PG 145, p. 941.
ad Eus., Chron. (Helm), XXIX, p. 196. (PG, 19, p. 554 ad ann. 2130).
Chabot, I, p. 123.
Hist. of the Jews, I, p. 254.
Various views have been expressed on the problems of the relation of the Diaspora rising with the Mesopotamian rebellion and the relation between the latter and Lusius Quietus’ suppression of the Jews. A few may be cited. Mommsen (The Provinces of the Rom. Emp., II, (Eng. trans.) 1909, p. 221), thought that the Jewish movement in Mesopotamia was an integral part of the general Jewish insurrection. Schürer (GVJ I, p. 666) wrote: “The Jews of Mesopotamia in his (Trajan’s) rear also became restive. Trajan commanded... Lusius Quietus... to sweep the insurrectionists out of the province.“ Juster (Les Juifs dans l’Empire romain, II, 1914, p. 89 nn.) saw the Mesopotamian movement as part of the entire Diaspora revolt. Graetz (Hist. of the Jews, JPS edn., 1949, p. 397), shared his view, but apparently believed that Quietus’ repressive massacre was a consequence of the rising. Longden (CAH XI, 1936, pp. 249-50) distinguishes between the general rebellion of the population of Mesopotamia, and the fear of a renewed rising on the part of the Jews, which led to Quietus’ repressive action. Abel (Hist. de la Palestine, II, 1952, p. 62) connects the action of the Mesopotamian Jews with the revolt of Edessa and Nisibis. Fuks (JRS 51, 1961, p. 99) accepts the view that the Mesopotamian Jewish rebellion was part and parcel of the general rising of the whole country. Important as a factor influencing the Jewish attitude to Rome may have been Trajan’s plans for reorganizing the caravan trade (in the year 116) — Fronto, Princ. Hist., 1 — referred to by Smallwood, The Jews under Rom. Rule, p. 411, n. 91.
Jos. Ant. XII, 3, 4 (148-53), and see Schalit, JQR 50, 1960, pp. 289 sqq.
II Macc. 8, 20; for the battle concerned, see B. Bar Kokhba, Pr. Cambridge Philological Soc.², 19, 1960, pp. 289 sqq.
Jos., Ant., XVII, 2, 1-3 (23-31).
Ant. XVIII, 9 (310-79).
Ibid.
The reference is to Nisibis in Babylonia, not to the Mesopotamian town of the same name.
C. H. Kraeling, Excavs. at Dura-Europos, Final Report, VIII, Part i. The Synagogue, 1956, Plates LII, LIII.
Ibid., PI. LVI.
Kahrstedt seems to have interpreted the Dura murals in much the same spirit — see his Kulturgeschichte der röm. Zeit, 1958, p. 390.
Ha 11, 1962, p. 508, n. 34.
Fifteen ancient synagogues have been identified on the Golan plateau since 1967. — See the Archaeological News of the Dept, of Antiquities of Israel, nos. 26, 30, 33, 37, 41, 42, 45 etc. (1968-73). Some of these villages appear to have originated in the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD, but Josephus’ evidence of Jewish settlement under Herod (Ant. XVII, 2, 2-26 sqq.) indicates a considerable Jewish population from the end of the ist century B.C. at least.
Cf. Jos., Vita, 24 (119); Ant. XIV, 10, 6 (207).
A. Biichler, JQR XVI, 1904/5, pp. 187-8; Applebaum, Eretz Yisrael, VIII, 1967, p. 284 (Heb.).
S. Klein, Tarbiz, I, 1930, pp. 136 sqq.; Biichler, loc. cit., pp. 180-8; Z. H. Horowitz, Eretz Yisrael and her Neighbours (Heb.), 1923, p. 240; R. Benoit, J. T. Milik, R. de Vaux, Les Grottes de Murabba’at, 1961, p. 126; B-Tz. Luria, King Yannai, (Heb.), 1961, pp. 39 sqq.
S. Yeivin, The War of Bar Kokhba² (Heb.), 1952, p. 25 and Map 1.
Jos., BJ VII, 6, 6 (217).
BJ vn, loc. cit.
Mid. Siphre, ad Deut., Friedmann, p. 357, para. 149. The opinion that the matziqim were conductores on imperial domain (Alon, Hist. of the Jews, I, p. 37; Applebaum, Eretz Yisrael, VIII, pp. 283-7) cannot be sustained, since it is evident from rabbinical literature that they had free disposal of their lands, which they were able to alienate. The midrashim must be interpreted to mean that they were mainly ex-soldiers and the agents of Romans who had received grants of land from the Emperor (Cf. Mid. Siphre ad Deut., Friedmann, para. 317; Mid. Tannaim ad Dent., Hoffmann, 13, p. 193). For a new discussion of the problem, see now Applebaum, Prolegomena to the Study of the Second Jewish Revolt, (A.D. 132-135), 1976, pp. 10-12.
Jer., Ta’aniot, IV, 69a.
Momigliano was certainly right in believing (Ricerclie sull’ organizzazione della. Giudea sotto il Dominio Romano, pp. 392-3 — Annuali della R. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, ser. ii, II, 1934) that the confiscation of land did not apply to entire Judaea, and that not all the Jews lost their holdings. But if our interpretation of the term χώρα is right, in relation to Josephus’ statement that Vespasian kept it all for himself, the confiscated tracts would have been more than enough to constitute an economic and social factor of considerable importance.
Mid. Tannaim., Hoffmann, p. 193, 317; Mid. Siphre de Bei-Rav, Friedmann, pp. 317, 354; cf. Zion, 22, 1957, p. 81. (Heb.).
Zion, loc. cit., pp. 81-2.
For a summary, Applebaum, Eretz Yisrael VIII, 1967, pp. 283 sqq.: The agrarian question and the Revolt of Bar Kokhba.
P. Benoit, et al., Murabba’at, pp. 122 sqq.
Yadin, BTES, 26, 1962, pp. 227, 228, 232, 233; IEJ 12, 1962, pp. 249 sqq., nos. 43, 44, 45, 46.
B. Gittin, 57a.
Rattner, 30, pp. 145-6.
JRS 21, 15131, pp. 2-6; CAH XI, 1936, pp. 858-9; Alon, Hist. of the Jews, I, p. 251 sqq.
Eus. HE IV, 2 etc.; Dio LXVIII, 32, 5; Groag, PW XXVI, 1927, col. 1883.
For discussion of the status and forces of Judaea after 70, see n. 248 to p. 300. (Ch. VIII, § v).
Abel, Hist. de la Palestine, II, 1952, p. 64; M. Smallwood, Ha 11, 1962, p. 504.
SHA Had., V, 2; Libya denique ac Palaestina rebelles animos efferebant.
Rattner, 30 (see n. 409).
Die Tage Trajans, 1897, pp. 96-99.
Hist. of the Jews, I, p. 262.
App. frag. 19; see p. 318.
Alon, Hist. of the Jews, I, p. 248; cf. Tcherikover, The Jews in Egypt, pp. 163-6.
JRS 17, 1927, pp. x sqq.: The ruin of Egypt by Ronxan mismanagement.
Also in Jewish hands, according to Milne, but I am doubtful whether the evidence is sufficient to confirm his opinion. It is that of Josephus, C. Ap., II, 64 (Nam amministratio tritici nihilo minus ab eis quam ab aliis Alexandrinis translata est), which hardly favours Milne’s statement.
CAH X, 1934, pp. 314-5.
Thus also Rostovtzeff, SEHRE p. 295, and especially op. cit. pp. 298, 677, on the situation of the fellaheen. But concerning the deteriorating position of the middle classes in this period, Milne and Bell do not agree with Rostovtzeff.
Xiph..Epit. Dio, LXVIII, 32.
K. Friedmann, Miscellanea di studi Ebraici in memoria di H. Chajes, 1930: Le fonte per la storia degli Ebrei di Cirenaica nel’Antichità, pp. 52-3; U. Wilcken, Hermes, 28, 1892, p. 479; Juster suggests that Xiphilinus’ statements are derived from Alexandrian anti-Semitic literature; he thus rejects Joel’s view that Xiphilinus’ allegations are entirely his own invention.
M. Joel, Blicke in die Religionsgeschichte, 1893, II, pp. 153 sq.; 165 sqq.
HE IV, 2, 4: “The Greeks who lived at that time reported these things in writing and related them in the same words.”
CPJ II, no. 437 = P. Giss. 24.
XIV, 12.
Juvenal, Sat. XV, 93-115; cf. G. Highet, Juvenal the Satirist, 1954, pp. 149 sq.
J. G. Milne, Hist. of Egypt under Roman Rule, 1898, p. 63.
Ibid.
Jos., BJ IV, 9, 8 (541).
I Macc. 2, 45; 5, 63. For a hellenistic statue at Beth Shean (Beisan) decapitated, probably by the Jews in the reign on John Hyrcanus, (135-104 BC) see The Ancient Historian and his Materials, Essays in honour of C. E. Stevens (ed. B. Levick), 1976, pp. 66-7.
Jos., Vita, 12 (65).
Plato, Leg. XI, 931 A.
Moralia, de Is. et Os., 71. E. Bevan (Holy Images, 1940, pp. 20 sq.), although stating that there were few people who saw the image as the god himself, adds (ibid. p. 23): “Yet it is quite plain that these people did think of the god as in some sense animating the image — animating all the many consecrated images in different places.” In proof he cites the custom of clothing the images, and the various stories describing how divine statues moved and gave signs. — Cf. the tale in the “Acts of the Pagan Martyrs” (CPJ no. 157 = P. Oxy. 1242) relating to the actual period of the rebellion. On the mechanical animation of statues for magical purposes, a very widespread practice in Egypt, see E. R. Dodds, The Greeks and the Irrational, 1963, pp. 292-4.
E. Urbach, Rulings on Idolatry and the Archaeological and Historical Reality, Eretz Yisrael, V, 1958, pp. 199 sqq. On this theme see also Saul Liebermann, Greek and. Hellenism in Eretz Yisrael, 1963, pp. 236 sqq. But Liebermann’s discussion is mainly restricted to the outlook of the country’s scholars, and does not touch upon the attitude of Diaspora Jewry. He observes (p. 237) that the scholars entirely refrained from attacking the Greek pagan gods; such attacks were engaged in only by the Jews of the Diaspora; see also H. A. Wolfson, Philo, 1948. I, pp. 14 sqq.
Jer., AZ VII, 42c.
Johannes Ephesi, (Schonfelder), 251-3.
R. G. Collingwood, R. P. Wright, The Roman Inscriptions of Britain, I, 1965, no. 152; CIL VII, 45.
Moralia, De Is. et Os., 71; cf. Tac., Hist., III, 71, 19-20.
E. G. Hardy, Monumentum Ancyranum, 1923, pp. 108-g, ch. xxiv (IV, 49-51);cf. Dio LI, 17; Strabo, XIII, 30 (595); XIV, 13 (637).
JRS 51, 1961, p. 104.
Cf. J. M. Jost, Gesch. der Israeliten, III, 1822, pp. 221-5; Tcherikover, (The Jews in Egypt, p. 178) sees the movement as directed primarily against the Greeks; Fuks too sees its beginning in Alexandria and Cyprus as a clash of Jews and Greeks (JRS 51, p. 102); cf. Lepper, Trajan’s Parthian War, p. 92. But Xiphilinus, Epit. Dio, LXVIII, 68 says explicitly: “The Jews from the vicinity of Cyrene... exterminated the Romans and the Greeks.”
HE IV, 2, 3; Chron. II, 164 (PL II, 554 (346-7); vers. Arm., p. 219.
VII, 12, 6.
I, 657.
CPJ nos. 438, 450.
Jos., Ant., XVI, 6, 4 (167-8); 6, 6 (171); XIV, 10,8 (214); 10, 16 (234); 10, 21 (244).
The anti-Jewish writer Apollonius Molon, born at Alabanda in Caria, was active in Rhodes.
philo, de poenis et praemiis, XXVIII-XXIX (165-6).
O. Bates, The Eastern Libyans, 1914, pp. 6 sqq.
Bates, op. cit., p. 13; for a bibliography of the journey, Dictionary of American Biography, 5, 1930, sv. Eaton, William, p. 613.
The columns of the peristasis of the Temple of Zeus at Cyrene are now known to have been overthrown in the Christian period (see p. 352), but the inner columns of the naos suffered in 115-117. For the Temple of Apollo, whose outer columns were overthrown in 115-117, See p. 275.
The question arises whether the naval monument in the agora of Cyrene which takes the form of a warship’s prow surmounted by a female figure, commonly thought to be Nike, has any connection with the Jewish revolt. The monument was found in 1929, but its base was located only during the excavations conducted after the Second World War (Stucchi, Cirene 1957-66, p. 87). The figure surmounting it was discovered by the American expedition of 1910, and the location of the base established that the figure belonged to the same monument. Unfortunately authorities have differed greatly as regards the statue’s date and identity; dates vary from the hellenistic period to the ist century A.D. (For the references, see Stucchi, op. cit., pp. 87 sqq.). Opinions on the identity of the figure range between Nike, an Aura, Athene and Athene-Nike. Since Stucchi wrote, Caputo (PP 23, 1966, pp. 232 sqq.) has suggested that this is an Augustan monument commemorating Actium. The following however may be stated: 1) Structurally the warship’s prow is not pre-hellenistic, and could well be Roman. 2) Its structure bears a considerable resemblance to the ancient clay models of ships’ prows common in prehistoric Cyprus. (L. P. di Cesnola, Cyprus, 1877. p. 259). A possibility therefore exists that the naval victory commemorated was connected with Cyprus and was won in the Roman period. A connection with the Jewish revolt is not therefore beyond the bounds of credibility, but further evidence is needed.
See A. Kasher, Zion 41, 1976, pp. 127 sqq., (Heb.), on the question of the despatch of Roman forces from Egypt to the Parthian campaign (especially pp. 130-32). The evidence is not impressive, concerning chiefly the whole or part of III Cyrenaica and the Ala Augusta. It is difficult to estimate the Roman garrison’s strength at the time of the rebellion; in 83 it included two legions, three alae of cavalry and eight cohorts of infantry, four of which were equitatae, (Lesquier, L’armée rom. d’Égypte, pp. 103 sqq.), totalling some 17,500 men. Under Hadrian, after the removal of the two former legions and their replacement by one legion only, the garrison consisted, according to Cheesman’s estimate (The Auxilia of the Roman Army, 1914, pp. 163-4) of 2,500 cavalry, 750 mounted infantry and 10,950 infantry.
CIL II, 1970 etc.
ILS 1435; CAH XI, 1936, p. 213. n. 2.
Caes, BG, IV, 20.
Plin., Ep. X, 74.
Debevoise (A Political History of Parthia, 1938, p. 217), thinks that the mailed cavalrymen seen on Trajan’s Column may be Parthians, in which case Pacorus aided Decebalus by actually sending military assistance.
Tac., Germ., 33.
Yeivin, Bar Kokhba², pp. 42, 66; Seder ‘Olam R., Rattner, 30.
An epitaph from Ptolemais, the style of whose letters seems to belong to the 3rd century, is Jewish (NAMC I, 1915, p. 152, fig. 52). It is also possible that Jewish influence went to the making of the heresy of Sabellius, who lived at Ptolemais. (Cf. Bonaiuti, Nuova Antologia, II, 1950, p. 183). In the 4th century Jewish ships were plying between Alexandria and Cyrene (Synes. Epp. 4). Cf. also Antiochi monachi, de insomniis, (PG, 89, col. 1692): ἔρχεται εὶς Παλαιστίνην καὶ ἀπήλθεν εὶς Νοάρα καὶ Λιβύαδα, τὰ ὁρμητήρια τῶν Ἰουδαίων. I am indebted for this reference to Drs. B. Jones and P. Llewelyn of the University College of North Wales, also to Professor Anthony Birley, who sent it to me.
CPJ I, p. 94 (Prolegomena): “The general impression is that of a complete breakdown of Jewish life in Egypt.”
Ibid.
Yadin, IEJ 11, 1961, p. 46, no. 11 (Nahal Bever).
M. Sola, IX, 12; cf. S. Liebermann, Hellenism in Jewish Palestine, 1950, pp. 100-101.
Tos. Sotah, XV, 5.
P. Oxy. 1242; cf. Musurillo, APM pp. 162 sqq.
Jer., AZ, IV, 43.
J. Basnage, Hist. des Juifs, 1716, VII, p. 185; Marcier, Hist. de VAfrique Septentrionale, 1888, I, p. 137; for a criticism of these views, Hirschberg, Jour, of African Hist., IV, pp. 313 sqq.
Jer., Sukk. V, 55b.