ZetaTalk: Science - читать бесплатно онлайн полную версию книги автора Nancy Lieder (Начало книги) #1

ZetaTalk: Science

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

The Zetas talk about whether the Universe was created in a Big Bang and what Follows After, what relationship to all this Black Holes have, and why a Turnabout occurs; whether the Universe is filled with Dark Matter and has

Space/Time Curves; how Gravity has many facets and where mankind goes awry in trying to create an Anti-Gravity

Device; whether gravity is balanced by a Repulsion Force; why what makes Suns burn, and if there is a Solar

Atmosphere; why there are frequently Binary Suns; why there are Solar Flares and how X-Rays relate; and why we won't see a Star Birth. The Zetas talk about how Atmosphere Building occurs; what causes Sonic Booms and the Earth's Rotation, Tides, and colorful Auroras; how Planetary Magnetism operates and why Gaseous Planets go in

Opposition; how we can do better at Earthquake Predictions how EQ Clouds relate; what caused the Tunguska

Explosion; and whether mankind can succeed at Deflecting Asteroids. The Zetas talk about how there are many types of Light Particles and Light Particle Bonds and what causes Red Shift; how gravity is caused by Gravity Particles and

Gravity Flow and how this affects Galaxies; how Particle Flow and Energy Waves operate; what causes Ball

Lightning; what happens during Ice Formation and Explosions; whether there are Subatomic Particles within

subatomic particles; why man will not solve the Unified Theory nor is the current weather by Human Hand; and why only some ores have Ferromagnetism.

The Zetas talk about how life begins in a Water Cradle; how all life has Sentience to some degree; why some forms of

Early Man seemed to die out; how DNA Building Blocks throughout the Universe differ; why we have Biorhythms; whether people can slow the Aging Process; what causes Auto-Immune Diseases and Spontaneous Human

Combustion; what caused the Dinosaur Extinction; how Dolphin Talk can travel across an ocean; and whether we are about to experience Worldwide Infertility. The Zetas Talk about what the Mind/Body Connection is that gives rise to conscious thought; what function Brain Waves perform; what occurs during a Coma; whether humans only use 10% of their Brain Capacity; whether humans have an EQ as well as an IQ; and how Telekinesis occurs.

Prior to 2003, when Planet X was inbound, the Zetas talked about how the 12th Planet is disturbing the Earth's

Magnetic Field and Gravity Field and solar system Equilibrium and Status Quo, with Resonance and Orbit

Perturbations; why this causes what sounds like sonic Booms and Flashes; how these periodic visits are responsible for

Pole Reversals and Rotation Reversals; why there is a Shift Threshold and to tilt is the Weakest Link and why a Close

Pass is worse; why the Magnetic/Geographic poles do not align; what causes the meandering pattern of Wandering

Poles; what the Chance of Collision is or an Rotation/Orbit change; whether a collision was responsible for creating the Asteroid Belt in the past and why Near Earth Asteroids exist; how this is related to the Earth being lopsided and experiencing Continental Drift; how the Earth was struck by giant Meteors in the past; what caused the African

Coapies; why there is an Earth Twin we never see; and what caused Oil Deposits to form. The Zetas talked about why breaking news about Planet X was suppressed; how its location correlates with the 12th Planet Orbit, which is a Sling

Orbit; what Second Foci the 12th Planet has; how to compute the current Distance from Earth; why it moves in a

Retrograde Orbit; what its anticipated Entry Angle due to gravitational Conflicts, and its Speed and Slowing

Influences will be, and how it achieves Escape Velosity; how the first and Second Pass differ; and explain how the

12th Planet Glow acts as its Sun so it is a smoldering Brown Dwarf and why it is a Red Planet with Swirling Moons.

In 2003 the Zetas talked about how Surging Magma and a Surging Switch occur as the Planet X enters our solar system, creating a 3rd Magnet, a S. Pole Tug so that the Stage Set; how the Dust Cloud Arrival and a Charged Dust

Cloud relate. The Zetas talked about how orbits are not Sacred Orbits; how Light Illusion make it more difficult to see at close range; how the how the Point of Passage will form a triangle as Planet X will Float Past the Sun. In 2004 the Zetas talked about how there is Precursor Drift due to What Magnets Do during a halted orbit of Earth; how the Dance

of the Moons and Second Sunlight are clues to the arrival, and Whither the Earth; how the planets are Dancing

Partners, and how Comets Come Early and a Constellation View and Jupiter's Blue Ring area proof, a Hazelwood

Killer the result, and Newton's Clock no longer applies. The Zetas talked about how the Dark Twin creates Whiplash

and its composition affects Dark Twin Visibility; how the planets bunched together in front of Planet X created Dark

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s00.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:35 AM]

ZetaTalk: Science

Twin Looms; how Planet X is a Shrouded Monster but Photographic Proof exists. The Zetas talked about how the Earth is in the Big Squeeze, Waiting to Exhale, while Planet X is Plowing Ahead; why a Twirling Wobble has ensued and 23° is the Key, the Rings of Planet X proof as are times when the Earth is in the Eye of the Storm so there is a

Lull in the Eye. The Zetas talked about the Meaning of Sedna; and why they sometimes Jerk Nancy Around as during the June 8 Transit, doing Bait and Switch as to where Venus and Mars are located or Venus Playing Chicken. In 2005

the Zetas talked about how Magma Voids will cause Storm Clash; how Planet X is Bigger and Closer, and what life

Beneath the Dust is like. In 2006 the Zetas talked about Simulating the Seasons such as the Solstice during a stopped orbit. In 2007 the Zetas talked about an Intermittent Lurch and IERS Flatlined. And in 2008 the Zetas talked about what recent Light Towers mean.

The Zetas talk about what determines the order of Planets in a solar system; why Orbits are Elliptical and how this relates to Slowing Probes; what factors cause the Orbital Plane to develop; why planets rarely have Binary Orbits; why

Planet Revolutions continue in spite of Perturbations; why Centrifugal Force is not the answer; how Satellite Orbits are

in fact man-made; and why Trajectories are not symmetrical. The Zeta talk about whether comets come from the Oort

Cloud; why we have Repeating Comets; whether Ephemeris can predict a comet's path; and whether astronomers are still in the Dark Ages and have Contradictions in their laws, and where Newton went wrong. The Zetas talk about whether there are Absolute Properties; whether Mathematical Proofs prove anything; how Vectors and Quantum

Mechanics are flawed; what causes tornadoes to Spin; whether one can lie with Statistical Analysis; how aliens have the capacity to do Time Travel by manipulating Time Flow and to do Interstellar Travel and Hover; how they have

Super Conductors that work at room temperature; whether Crystals have magical properties or Cold Fusion is possible; why Newman's Machine seems to work; and whether aliens manipulate gravity with Element 115.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s00.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:35 AM]

ZetaTalk: Universe

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Universe

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

The vast Universe, which so intrigues man, has mysteries seemingly out of the reach of man. How big is it? Does it

have boundaries? Does it go forever, or is it circular? Is it all an illusion? Is it homogeneous throughout? So many

questions. Does the Universe have physical boundaries? We do not know, nor are we allowed to know in the density

we are in, 4th Density. To us, with our instruments and in our travels, it appears to be boundless. We travel only so

much, using home as a base, and limit our travels not because of distance but due to what is known about certain parts

of the Universe, which would be poisonous to us. We too use probes, set to take their measures and return. This is the

manner by which your Solar System was located, not by us, but by others. If the probe returns with data that indicates

an environment that would be poisonous or quickly fatal, we do not, understandably, explore that part of the Universe.

Travel in light form, during higher densities, does not carry those risks.

Different sections of the Universe have different compositions. By this we mean the elements are found in different

proportions and the resultant chemical reactions that ensue therefore have different characteristics. Some worlds have

silicon based life. Some suns emit radiation that is poisonous to us and would be to you also. Those environments

contain severe dangers, as silicon based microbes are ones your immune system could not begin to muster a defense

against. An analogy we could use is the soil across a terrain. One place is acidic and is covered with moss, another has

soil that compacts into rock-like hardness, discouraging probing roots. The variables are many, and any horticulturist

will tell you that a wildflower taken from one location could not be expected to grow in another. Just so is the

Universe, we have discovered, and the mix of elements that compose the soil in this section of the Universe is our and

your niche. Incarnated, we are not allowed, not able, to explore outside this niche.

Beyond some simple statements, we are not at liberty to explain the Universe to humans, as we are restrained by the

Rule of Non-Interference and also by our ignorance. For you, it seems that the Universe is limitless, and boundless,

and is not an illusion. So be it, as for you that is a reality and in particular the reality which you must live in. It is also

the reality which we, the Zetas, must live in, and in truth we do not know that much more about the functioning of the

Universe than you do. The Universe holds secrets that we are not allowed to know at this time, at our stage of spiritual

growth. These questions must go unanswered, for the time being.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s08.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:36 AM]

ZetaTalk: Big Bang

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Big Bang

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

Neither Albert Einstein or Stephen Hawkins are correct in their theories on the origin of the Universe, although there

are portions of both theories that contain some element of truth. The Universe is not inert, subject to pressures that

cause it to explode or compress back into black holes. It is no more inert than your body. It is alive. When we speak of

religion, and say we are all parts of the One, that we are within God, and that the Universe is within God, we are

referring to this. The natural laws that seem immutable to you are functioning as they are because this is God’s

intention at the present time. Much of what you desire to learn will not be available to you until you reach greater

spiritual maturity. It is not even on the platter during your next stage of development, 4th Density, the Service-to-Self

or Service-to-Other consolidation stage.

Following a Big Bang, particular matter forms along the following lines. First, the explosion of matter from a Black

Hole, which has grown monstrously large in the eons leading up to a particular Big Bang, is not even. No explosions

are even, and all affect different parts of the matter they are affecting at different rates and times. Thus, particular

matter coming out of a Big Bang is not even, all the same composition. Just as your Sun, which seems to be of the

same consistency, is not homogeneous, and just as the core or magma of your Earth is not homogeneous, just so the

matter coming out of a Big Bang quickly becomes differentiated. There are literally millions of factors affecting what a

bit of matter will become, and the sum of these factors affect how that bit of matter will interact for it's existence until

the next Big Bang it finds itself entangled in.

Particles that are fluid, on the move, are by their nature loosely coupling with other particles. Humans are familiar with

the coupling that occurs in atoms, the nucleus surrounded by whirring electrons, for instance. Other particles couple in

predictable ways. What causes attraction and repulsion between particle types? We will use a common example to

explain, as the concepts can get complex. Magnetism happens due to the continuous flow of magnetic particles, a type

of the particle you call electrons, but this magnetic flow is not consistent everywhere. It is concentrated where a break in the pattern of electronic orbiting a nucleus allows a mass escape. What are they escaping from? An over-concentration of whatever it is they are made of! In the case of magnetism, magnetic particles are escaping from a

press of other magnetic particles, since they couple poorly and seldom, they are readily on the move.

All matter seeks a level of homogeneity, and can never achieve it as it is by its nature, coming out of the Big Bang,

non-homogeneous with the other particle types. Likewise, attraction is in essence an escape, misinterpreted by the

humans who have termed it otherwise. Gravity is nothing more than the effect of returning gravity particles drifting

back into a gravitational giant after having been ejected in what we would equate to a laser stream of particles, which

burst through rather than push at whatever is in their way to escape. Why do they drift back, and is this not an

attraction to return to the gravitational giant they just recently left? As odd as it may sound to those unused to these

concepts, these gravity particles are indeed running away from an environment they find clogged with matter

composed of element they themselves are heavy in - what humans commonly term the Dark Matter that fills to void of

space. They crowd back into what is for them a lesser field, the core of gravitational giants, where they are repeatedly

ejected due to this very crowding!

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s01.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:37 AM]

ZetaTalk: Follows After

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Follows After

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.

Big Bangs affect vast areas, a fact which man is aware of as all he can see seems to have been affected by the same

event. But prior to clumping and becoming dense, matter is more homogeneous and fluid and thus each atom more

easily influenced. As in all events, something came first, and as in all events, something clumps or moves first, and this sets the stage for what follows. Explosions send things in all directions, so motion outward is rapid and has no brakes

other than the matter that lies behind it. Thus, matter on the periphery has push behind it, and matter closer to the

center of the Big Bang finds it has no push behind it, eventually. The center is a void, and thus nearby matter, from the inside out, starts returning to this void to escape the crowding it finds everywhere else.

As this matter returns, it interacts with other matter, attempting to equalize crowding. Even in homogeneous matter any

motion, even on the sub-atomic level with a single atom on the move, creates a zigzag due to the pressure created

when moving in any direction. Motion become circular, to develop a spin, when any inequality on either side of the zigzag occurs, such that the zig or zag is not simply back and forth, but takes a curve. During the time it takes for

galaxies to form from a Big Bang, matter is fluid for a long enough time for the motion in the center to affect and

establish the motion throughout. This takes the form of individual or local dramas, here and there, but the

synchronized spin of galaxies stands as a mute witness to the fluidity of the spurt coming out of a Big Bang, and to the

extent to which what is called Dark Matter, which we have termed tiny matter, exists as a glue binding the Universe

together in ways mankind little understands.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s120.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:38 AM]

ZetaTalk: Black Holes

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Black Holes

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

So dark that light can't escape, so dense that all matter going in gets compressed into imperceptibility. What is a black

hole, and does matter go in and never come out? All is relative, and the denseness of black holes only seems so to

humans because they have no basis of comparison. Also, as nothing seems to be coming out, humans assume this is a

bottomless pit of some sort, and frankly fear black holes. They serve a purpose, however, and are part of God's plan for

renewing the Universe. You know about the concept of the big bang, which we have explained as setting the clock

back on a part of the Universe, a type of refreshed state. The big bang requires something to bang from, and that state

is what the black holes are accumulating.

Do black holes consume all that they catch in their snare, and is there any escape? Black holes are voracious, but

proceed slowly. So slowly, in fact, that one can escape without even making haste. In addition, black holes do not

capture souls, as developed entities can float out of them, being of a lighter substance. However, black holes do

accumulate the substance of which souls are composed, when this has not formed into an entity, and remains loose and

undefined. This is packaged into the whole, and spread uniformly during the big bang, and thus the process of worlds

forming and evolving begins again, in a small part of the Universe. This is part of God's plan, as far as we know it.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s17.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:38 AM]

ZetaTalk: Turnabout

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Turnabout

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.

Does the expansion coming out of a Big Bang continue forever, or does it turnabout and become a large Black Hole,

to start the process again? A discussion on these issues places man outside of his environment, as to him he sees only

expansion in the Universe around him, so a turnabout is theoretical and thus subject to haggling. We, the Zetas, have

visited portions of the Universe where a turnabout is in process, so can speak to these issues with confidence.

However, on these sci.astro debates, haggling occurs in any case. To make the statement that expansion goes on into

infinity is to assume that such activity occurs in a vacuum - a silly assumption. You have expansion and contraction

occurring in a school yard, when a toy rocket is sent skyward and then slows and falls back to earth. Should one of the

boys declare that the rocket will proceed forever, based on dissecting the trajectory so only the escape is considered,

he’d be called a fool. But on sci.astro, this is allowed to be a serious argument.

So what are the factors that influence a turnabout?

First, the rush of matter leaving a Big Bang is not homogeneous, else formation of stars and planets would not occur

but the Universe would be like Jell-O or pudding, all one consistency. Subatomic particles retain their identify even

within a Black Hole, and waste no time returning to their familiar dance of interaction with other particles, based on

their nature, when freed from the constraints of the Black Hole. Thus, during the rush of matter leaving an exploding

Black Hole, there are parts to the side as well as before and behind any given matter or clump of matter, and this is the incipient basis of the turnabout. An endless stretch into infinity, that silly argument, assumes only the influence behind any given escaping matter, which is simply never the case.

Second, incipient Black Holes are formed immediately after a Big Bang, and why would they not? Black Holes are

driven by gravity, a gravitational giant that assumed a density so intense that the flow of gravity particles attracted to it

overwhelms the outbursts of particles squeezing out from the center, tipping the equilibrium such that an ever-

increasing density of the gravitational giant occurs. Gradually, it builds in strength and size, and pulls from the side

that matter moving outward from the Big Bang. So the motion changes from expansion to a slowing curve, and

eventually to a compression of matter into the nearest Black Hole, and thence of Black Holes into each other, until the

stage is set for another Big Bang.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s105.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:39 AM]

ZetaTalk: Dark Matter

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Dark Matter

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

Dark matter has been postulated by scientists to explain all the movement and behavior that they cannot explain in the

Universe. Insert dark matter, and it all fits, or so they are currently postulating. In fact, dark matter does not explain it all, or even explain it very well, but this is the current fad. Why is dark matter termed dark? Well, because folks can't

see it, or measure it, or capture it, and thus it is dark, hiding, as it were. Well, matter does not hide. It has no reason to do so, being without a sneaky motive. It is not dark matter that is gluing everything together in some strange,

immeasurable way, it is tiny matter, in fact, which the scientists of Earth have yet to see because it is too little for their

eyes and their instruments as of yet.

The particles of tiny matter, like bugs, are more numerous as they get smaller. Humans are always horrified to see how

many mites there are in a speck of dust. Mites are everywhere, and should one have the guts to count, the number of

mites in the room would be vastly greater than the number of silverfish or cockroaches. And, of course, the number of

bugs in the room vastly outweighs the number of humans. Such is the situation in the Universe. Man saw the planets,

e.g. humans in the room, and registered their personalities. This happened early on. Then man become aware of the

energy that composes the solar wind, and light rays that come from distant galaxies, e.g. visible bugs in the room, and

registered their personalities. This happened recently. However, humans are not yet aware of the galactic tiny stuff,

e.g. mites, and thus don't have a very important piece of the puzzle in place.

Before humans became aware of the planets, and their relationship to the Sun, there were all kinds of strange

explanations for their motions. Since the Flat Earth Society is still among you, we need not go into detail. Before

humans became aware of the energy paths in the galaxy, there also were all kind of strange explanations for what

seemed to be the erratic nature of the greater Universe, which bobbled and glowed and winked, behavior which was

most often ascribed to the gods or one's own misbehavior. Now scientists are dealing with the larger, visible planets

behaving toward one another like something else is there. You can assume this to be a massive amount of tiny matter.

The stuff the Universe is made of, elemental particles that are not moving, are not clumping, and thus do not form

mass or register as energy.

Nothing to get excited about. Just calculate its weight, and think of it as galactic air - something to pass through.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s14.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:39 AM]

ZetaTalk: Space/Time Curves

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Space/Time Curves

Note: written on Feb 15, 1997.

Regarding the amusing human notion that space/time curves. This theory gained credence recently as humans have

been able to track cosmological events more closely with the Hubble, and noted that the perimeter of an explosion

curved slightly as the event progressed. Do you imagine that light rays are immune to gravitational influences? They

are formed of particles, just as what you call matter is, and as such as subject to the same influences. We have stated

that the Auroras, which are visible light shows and not at all related to magnetic fields, are caused by the bending of

light subjected to the Earth's gravity. This would be visible elsewhere around the globe, but except in the dim light

near the poles does not stand out. Why would particles move in a curve?

Humans should keep in mind that what they see of the Universe reflects

the original situation, such as a nova, that caused the light to escape and move in the direction of Earth.

the direction those light particles were pulled in, by gravitational influences

What humans on Earth do not see is

light that was not moving in a straight line path toward Earth, to begin with

light that was pulled so that it was no longer in a straight-line path toward Earth

Your human scientists are aware of this, identifying places in space where no light seems to escape as black holes.

Nevertheless, as curving space/time seemed like such an interesting possibility among those hoping to always prolong

their stay at the trough the taxpayers are obliged to fill, NASA talked it up. They know better but don't want the

paychecks to stop.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s89.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:40 AM]

ZetaTalk: Gravity

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Gravity

Note: written on Feb 15, 1996.

Humans think that gravity is a simple, singular force, but gravity has many aspects and varies depending on the

composition of the objects in question and their distance from each other.

Gravity differs between objects of different compositions. Like compositions attract each other more, due to the

compatibility of their makeup. They have no extraneous dramas to resolve. Metals figure heavily in this, no pun

intended, as a magnetic component enters into the equation. Where there is flexibility for the objects to turn, one or

both will maneuver such that they are magnetically aligned. This takes time, however slight, and thus an iron ball may

appear to fall more slowly in a vacuum than an object of comparable weight that has but a slight magnetic retention.

Organic compounds also react to gravity in a different manner than in-organic compounds, and this is due to the

complex bonding between the atoms. Bonding involves tying up the electrons, which are used as glue in that they are

shared by more than one atom. Thus, organic material in general will not experience the interference that matter with

free electrons does during a gravity attraction. Inorganic material in essence takes time out to shed or take on electrons,

slowing its movement.

In general, the heavier an object, the greater the gravity force generated within it for another object. The gravity force

is more than compounded, equivocally, but this fact is lost by those viewing the drama because most of the drama takes

place within the object itself. Why would this not be the case? Why would matter only reach out to matter not

contiguous, with its attraction, and not matter near at hand? Some call this internal gravity compression, but this is

merely gravity working to pull each atom toward the greater bulk, which in the case of an orb, like a Sun or planet, is

generally toward the center. As the force of gravity reaches in all directions, the larger or heavier object is emitting

more of a come-on than a smaller or lighter object. When several objects are involved in giving each other the come-

on, the contention causes all of the bodies to dither, but an equilibrium is established in accordance with the mass and

composition of the objects and their distance from each other. Humans find their understanding of gravity to be

incomplete because they are not taking into consideration the repulsion force that large bodies, such as planets,

generate toward each other.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s55.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:40 AM]

ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices

Note: written on Aug 15, 1996.

The advent of the space age and the increasing number of UFO sightings have generated intense curiosity about space

travel in human scientists. Some cling to the notion that all travel within or against a gravity field must be by

propulsion, clinging to known and familiar theories - airplanes lifting off the ground and running parallel as long as the

air stream over the wings can be maintained, or rockets sent out and away from the Earth's gravity by propulsion.

Space ships, which zip about and hover as though gravity did not exist are clearly not run by propulsion, however, and

thus speculation is running rampant. Mankind will not be given the answers he seeks, nor will he be able to arrive at

the correct solution based on his own efforts. Human scientists are working and reworking their current concepts,

which are fraught with errors, and thus, heading in the wrong directions, they will not succeed.

Various theories on how space ships maneuver have been put forth, but none have been on target.

The silliest theories are that space ships indeed use propulsion, but are subtle about it. These theories have the

space ships hovering by the same means that hover craft stay above the ground or water, by blowing air out from

the bottom of the craft. All this is accomplished, so the theory goes, without disturbing the air space, though this

obvious contradiction is never addressed. Sightings where space ships move silently through forests, with never

a branch or leaf moving as they pass, would seem to discredit this theory, but the advocates hold firm. This

theory is a favorite of some as it allows mankind to be on a technological par with the visitors.

A partially correct theory is that space ships generate their own gravity field. This is not so much a theory as an

observation, since ships not only hover as though treating the gravity pull of the Earth with disdain, but provide

the occupants with their own gravity field. Earth scientists in the employ of MJ12 have first hand knowledge of

this, having taken short jaunts in observation ships and having noted that the ground can be in view overhead,

yet their feet remain stuck firmly to the floor. Creating one's own gravity field is primarily for comfort, not

travel, but it is also a component required for travel.

Element 115, a heavy metal Bob Lazar was introduced to, is indeed one of the means to achieve space travel,

though not the only means. Element 115 does not in and of itself have magical properties, a fact which should be

obvious from the reports leaking out of MJ12 labs. If element 115 had special gravity features, generating its

own gravity field without abatement, then all the scientists would find their feet stuck to the container rather than

the lab floor. It is not element 115 per se but the structure of its composition that supports other steps in the

process, and about this we will say no more.

Short cuts, such as space warps, have been discussed for decades as the easy answer. The Universe is circular, so

the theory goes, and all one need do to go elsewhere is step back along the circle rather than go the whole way

around. This theory is absurd, and doesn't take much to dispute. How does the Universe manage to project itself

to its astronomers and the stargazers among its common folk as linear if its actually up there in curves? Is the

Universe conducting a massive conspiracy to delude mankind? Star systems that appear to be far away are in

fact at a distance, and there are no short cuts, distance wise.

Negating the Earth's atmosphere is one step in the process, and as we have mentioned is one of the reasons for

generating an internal gravity in a space ship during travel. This is done, however, not to lift off the Earth, but to

provide the environment for the next step. Space ships hovering above the Earth are still dealing with the Earth's

gravity field, in full.

Hovering involves invoking the repulsion force in a controlled manner, and space travel involves turning it off in

a controlled manner. Space travel is a irresistible kiss, and a quick kiss, between two gravity attractors. This

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s77.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:41 AM]

ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices

quick kiss is achieved by turning off the repulsion force between two points, and is a carefully controlled

process. As mankind has yet to even accept the existence of a repulsion force, they will hardly arrive at the

scheme in the near future. And then, mankind is hampered by all the errors in their existing theories, which are

dragged forward as some sort of garbage that can never be discarded, held close to the hearts and minds of their

advocates.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s77.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:41 AM]

ZetaTalk: Repulsion Force

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Repulsion Force

Note: written on Sep 15, 1995.

Scientists are acutely aware of the attraction force inherent in gravity, as are folks in general. The babe learns about

this early, while taking his first few steps. Oops. Ouch! It is assumed that gravity has only an attractive force, and that

the planets, in orbit around the Sun, are held in place by their momentum. Does this make sense? What caused the

momentum in the first place? Children play with a ball on the end of a string, swinging it around and around their

head. As long as the arm is tugging, the ball maintains its orbit, else stops. Why would the planets not drift into the

Sun? Are the orbits all that swift so that centrifugal force is extreme?

The reason Mankind is Unaware of a repulsive force, also inherent in gravity, is that for this to become evident there must be a semblance of equality in size and weight, i.e. the mass of the objects, and freedom of movement such as

exists in space, and lack of undue influence from other nearby objects. Objects on the surface of the Earth have none

of these. They are infinitesimal in proportion to the Earth itself, and thus any repulsion the Earth may have toward a

tiny speck on its surface is also infinitesimal. Proportionally, its all gravity, a one way trip. The object on the surface,

pushing away, is overwhelmed by the Earth's gravitational pull, the attraction. The repulsion force is generated as a

result of two bodies exerting a gravitational force on each other. In the case of a tiny object on the surface of the Earth,

its gravitational pull on the Earth is scarcely noticed by the Earth. A gnat or mite. A nothing. Where the repulsion force

has not been invoked within the Earth by any objects placed on the surface of the Earth, this is in play between the

Earth and her Moon. The repulsion force is invoked between objects on the surface of the Earth, incessantly, but this is

masked by the intense force of gravity the Earth presents and other factors such as surface tension or friction or

chemical bonding so that the repulsion force cannot be recognized.

The gravitational force exists first. It is the static condition. The repulsion phenomena only manifests when, as we said,

the objects are of equal size, are free to move, and dominate the immediate environment. Where the repulsion force

comes to equal the force of gravity by the time the objects in play would make contact, it builds at a rate that differs

from gravity. Humans have calculated the force of gravity, which at first they assumed was equal for all objects but

lately have come to understand is stronger for larger objects. They have formulas for the force of gravity which have

proved accurate on the face of their home planet. These formulas are incomplete, and would not work as expected

elsewhere, however. The repulsion force is infinitesimally smaller than the force of gravity, but has a sharper curve so

that it equals the force of gravity at the point of contact. For experimental purposes, one would have to be almost at the

point of contact for it to come into play at all, and this in an environment where other factors are eliminated or

negated. To examine the phenomena, Earth scientists would have to set up a lab in space, far enough away from any

planetary body so that free movement is possible. Place two balls in a cage. Put one in motion toward another.

Microscopically examine the interchange. They do not touch. They do not bounce off one another. They do not touch.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s34.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:42 AM]

ZetaTalk: Repulsion Force

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s34.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:42 AM]

ZetaTalk: Suns

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Suns

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

The Sun lit, from dark and quiet matter, into the steady burn that has been going on for millennia, because of a series

of events. This series of events has taken place elsewhere, and often. It is the standard solar system panoply, in fact.

The steps are as follows. First, matter and energy are homogenized by a big bang process, which is only setting the

clock back to zero or wiping the slate clean, so to speak. The process, for this portion of the Universe, is reset. Coming

out of this big bang situation matter and energy begin to congeal, into all the many sub-atomic particles that form not

only what humans understand to be matter and energy, but many more such particles, including the particles that make

up the soul. During this congealing period there is little interaction. It is as though there is not enough of anything to

get into a contest. Small fry don't squabble.

Gradually the congealing process produces planets that orbit each other. This happens as matter has a natural attraction

and repulsion for and against other matter, and as the congealing process takes place attractions start movement but

repulsion causes a circular dance. Imagine a dance where all the potential partners are undecided. They approach and

then circle. Everything gets into motion.

At this point all is dark, the form and the void that the Bible refers to. So what starts the light? Continued congealing,

which in time produces pressure that starts yet another process. This process converts matter into energy, which is what

is occurring within the Sun. Humans make assumptions about the composition of suns, assuming light elements such

as helium, and about the burning process, assuming fusion with radioactive byproducts. They are incorrect on both

counts. A mass as large as a sun does not light, due to compression, unless key elements in the heavy element

spectrum are present to a sufficient degree. There are dead suns, smoldering suns, and lit suns, and the dye is cast in

this matter when the suns are first formed. Humans assume the burning process to be radioactive because their only

experience with intense production of heat and light also produces intense radioactivity. Should this be the case, would

not life on Earth be suffering from radiation poisoning?

Such volumes of energy emerge from such tiny amounts of what humans term matter, that the seemingly violent

brilliance of the Sun comes from very little mass. Of course, the Sun is diminished as this goes on, but by such a tiny

amount. In the scheme of things, not to matter at all. Over time, the pressure within the Sun takes two simultaneous

courses. One, the mass of the Sun shrinks to where the burning or conversion action slows down. The pressure has

diminished, due to the reduced mass. As the Sun cools, its matter shrinks and compresses, a natural process known to

humans. Cold things are more dense than hot things. This eventually sets off the second reaction of a dying star, the

super nova or explosion. The Sun lights again, for one last time, this time in a violent and uncontrolled burn that sends

its remaining particles off every which way.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s13.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:42 AM]

ZetaTalk: Solar Atmosphere

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Solar Atmosphere

Note: written during the Mar 1, 2003 Live ZetaTalk IRC session.

Mankind is used to thinking of the Sun as a gaseous object, which swirls on the surface as roiling boils to the surface,

and leaping flares are these boils explode beyond the surface on occasion. The surface changes color during this

activity, but as this seems to follow routines, mankind assumes he understand the internal process. He does not. The

Sun has an atmosphere, not visible to man, but nonetheless there, and why would it not? An atmosphere is simply a

heavier incidence of particles, atomic complexes, or whatever hanging about! The Earth, when seen from space, has an

atmosphere that looks similar to man from that he views from Earth. The Sun's atmosphere is not visible to man, so he

assume none exists. With increasing ability to image the Sun, increasing number of SOHO images released in support

of the disinfo campaign to get the public thinking that the current Earth changes are due to solar activity, incidences of

atmospheric disturbances are noted by the public. This is not alarming, but normal for the Sun.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s129.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:43 AM]

ZetaTalk: Binary Suns

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Binary Suns

Note: written on Nov 15, 1995.

Most suns or bodies large enough to potentially have become suns are in motion, themselves orbiting around others of

like size. This is not by accident, but is a factor of their size in proportion to the other clumps of matter that form

coming out of a big bang. Suns are monstrous in proportion to their planets, and the planets are monstrous in

proportion to their moons, and all are monstrous in proportion to the dust and meteor fragments haplessly caught in the

web of all the larger bodies. Just as the planets in a solar system orbit their sun because it is the largest voice around

them, just so suns themselves hear the voices of the other suns around them. If suns are not peers a different dance

ensues, but if peers neither sun dominates the other and they remain at a distance from each other depending on the

balance point between their gravity attraction to each other and the force of repulsion that develops as they move

toward each other. If they are in motion as this balance is achieved they will remain in motion, if all other factors are

also a settled issue at that time - binary suns.

If suns are not of an equal size they are not likely to become binaries, especially if there are other suns in the vicinity

vying to be dominant. The smaller sun may dither, perpetually, first approaching one larger brother and when turned

away by the repulsion force approaching the other brother and likewise being turned away. This scenario can entail

any number of large and small suns. Do not these suns of unequal size begin to orbit each other? Indeed they do, when

the size is greatly disproportional, but most suns are not that disproportional. Therefore, either a dither or more often a dance between peers develops. The dance that binaries do can be rapid and complex, if other suns are nearby and

influence the dance, or the dance can be a dead stand still, as is the case between your Sun and its dead twin.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s41.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:43 AM]

ZetaTalk: Solar Flares

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Solar Flares

Note: written on Jul 15, 1996.

What is termed sunspots have long been recognized to have an effect on life on Earth - static on the radio, disrupted

satellite transmissions, and some weather anomalies caused by what we would call tornado activity in the upper

atmosphere due to rapid heating of the air there - but few of their effects are known. Solar flares occur when the core

of the Sun reacts to factors it is sensitive to, just as the core of the Earth is increasing its activity in response to the

approach of the 12th Planet. The influences that affect the Sun are not related to gravity or even to the Sun's magnetic

field, which spreads far outside the Solar System, but to energy fields that man has yet to discover.

Gaseous planets and Suns, lit or unlit, do not have homogeneous cores any more than bodies with liquid cores such as

the Earth. Humans tend to think of air or gaseous clouds or liquid pools as being homogeneous, but in truth heavier

particles settle down, lighter particle rise, and other particles disperse slowly from their point of entry into the soup.

The process by which the Sun releases light and heat also releases other energy, unrecognized by man. This process is

not homogeneous, and thus buildup and release occur, just as weather disturbances occur in the atmosphere due to

irregular heating and cooling. Any lack of consistency in a body's core has the potential of causing core rotation, as the

components try to escape or approach that which they are repulsed by or attracted to in the neighborhood. Thus, the

Sun's core swirls, and when lighter elements rush toward the surface their motion is not impeded by the gaseous

surface and overshooting occurs - a solar flare.

The effect on Earth is in the realm of energy disruption, a surge of the various energy arenas that humans are aware of

and others they are unaware of. Solar flares affect the activity of fish and kelp in the sea, in that water bends and

deflects some energy rays and thus concentrates them. Just as humans find themselves more restless during a full

moon, life in the sea is a bit more restless during solar flares - energized. Solar flares do not affect the core of the

Earth, nor are they causing increased earthquake activity. This explanation by the establishment for increased activity

in the Earth's core is to avoid mentioning the approach of the 12th Planet, and is easily rebutted. Have sunspots

resulted in earthquakes in the past?

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s75.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:44 AM]

ZetaTalk: X-Rays

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: X-Rays

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.

The particle flow that manifests as X-Rays are used by man to examine the human body as well as numerous

applications in industry. They move slowly, and are easily stopped, and thus lodge in bone rather than pass through,

painting a picture of bone by this absence. X-Rays are observed by man occurring in bursts in the Universe, bursting

from suns and from the Sun in their solar system in, at times, distinctive patterns. What is causing this natural

outburst? Humans find they can excite X-Rays by the same process they excite electrons, and at times find them in

association with lightning. Heat and light particles are also so excited, as well as magnetic particles, but these particles

can be found in nature without the presence of electron flows too. There is cold light, and heat without light, magnets

without an electric charge, and electricity without magnetism or heat or light. They are independent particles, though

they may be affected by the same processes.

If X-Rays can be stopped readily by bone yet pass through soft tissue, then their bond with atoms is readily available,

and common. This is not the case with the particles that compose what man understands to be electrons, which leave

readily and go on the move, such that children can excite them by scuffing their feet across a rug. Where heat particles

can be excited by mechanical means, rubbing, light seems to man to require a chemical change such as occurs in

fireflies or fire. That all these particles are excited by the same process that gets electrons on the move should not be

surprising, as electron particle flows are an onslaught.

Electron flows affect the chemistry of the material electrons flow through, at least temporarily, by changing the

electron sharing that is a component of atom bonding. Thus light particles are produced in association with

electrons.

Electron flows affect the density of the material electrons flow through by this means also, at least temporarily,

so that atoms can approach each other more closely. This crowding of the affected material forces heat particles

to move until they find a less crowded home.

Magnetic particles flow through atoms, happily flowing in and out of a single atom unless forced to move from

atom to atom by an irregular electron shell around the atom that funnels them. Thus iron ore in nature may or

may not be a magnet, depending on the fluidity of the iron atoms. Electron flows create this irregularity, at least

temporarily, thus the phenomenon of electro-magnetism.

So can man assume, as some have, that the Sun reverses its magnetic field periodically, because during solar cycles the

X-Rays emitted by the Sun are emerging from a different spot on the surface? As X-Rays are so readily stopped that

pictures of bone and even the placement of soft tissue can be made, why would they not be stopped by the placement

of matter within the swirling core of the Sun? X-Rays are generated homogeneously within the Sun, as is heat and

light, but the particle flow is affected during its passage outward by the matter it encounters. Is this not the case with light, which can be readily bent during its passage through water or blocked entirely by walls? Is this not the case with

heat, which likewise can be blocked or absorbed by material, or transmitted and passed along? This is certainly the

case with X-Rays, which announced themselves to mankind by their very ability to be readily stopped by almost any

material put in their way!

Magnetism particles are not so readily stopped, however, and thus the phenomena of magnetic fields surrounding

planets and their suns, reaching far beyond this to encompass the solar system and more. Man finds he can create

confusion in a magnetic field, at least temporarily, by deflecting the flow of magnetic particles with other magnetic

particles. Take the confusion away and the magnetic field has re-established itself. Magnetic particles are on the move,

constantly, where other particles are not so fluid or mobile. Thus, the Sun’s magnetic field is independent of any other

particle flow, and persists in a constant state regardless of how other particles may be blocked or directed within the

Sun.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s121.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:45 AM]

ZetaTalk: X-Rays

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s121.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:45 AM]

ZetaTalk: Star Birth

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Star Birth

Note: written on Dec 15, 1995.

The world was treated, recently, to a view from the orbiting Hubble telescope - a twinkling, swirling cloud mass. The

death of stars is an event mankind has long been aware of, as super novas appear where dull stars formerly stood, and

then wink out altogether. As mankind's telescopes increase in power, more and more stars are discovered, but the birth

of a star has yet to be recorded. The process by which a star is born is not one mankind will view from their present

vantage point. The Eagle Nebula, while an impressive light display, is nothing more than sputtering, and no lasting star

will emerge. The birth of stars occurs after a big bang, where massing suns either light or fail to light, and there the

matter stands until the next compression and subsequent big bang in that part of the Universe.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s49.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:46 AM]

ZetaTalk: Atmosphere Building

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Atmosphere Building

Note: written on Dec 15, 1995.

Worlds that support life have water in abundance, and during the congealing period after a big bang hydrogen and

oxygen in many states can be found freely floating around the intensely hot proto-planets. As planets congeal, the

pressure results in heat, but after time this dissipates. Meanwhile, the surface boils. Condensation occurs, forming seas

upon the surface, but as nature abhors a vacuum, freely floating molecules do not all settle. What causes an atmosphere

to exist, and what factors affect the composition of an atmosphere. Even in the absence of heat that would cause

molecules of whatever nature to vaporize, an atmosphere builds. The Earth's atmosphere continues to build today, but

are the oceans boiling?

Water vapor is in abundance in the Earth's atmosphere, yet arrived there not due to the action of intense heat but to fill

a void. Place a vacuum against the surface of a pool of water and watch what happens - water vapor. The water pool

will not completely disburse because its normal state at the condensation temperature is a liquid. But the constant

motion of molecules means that the molecules at the surface have nothing to bump against in a vacuum, so like a car

without brakes, off they go. At a certain point the air-borne molecules start bumping into each other and bumping

against the surface of the water pool, and the situation stabilizes. So, does this mean that the atmosphere of a planet is

constantly disbursing into space? Yes and no. Deep space is bitterly cold, and when moving away from the surface of

a planet air- borne molecules slow down the bumping action. The situation stabilizes, again. However, some small loss

is a constant factor, so that after billions of years some small quantity of the planet's substance has dissipated.

Atmospheres, as any meteorologist knows, are composed of more than just free oxygen and water vapor - an

atmosphere reflects in its composition the planet it wraps. Every metal and every molecule combination on the open

surface of the planet can be found in the atmosphere. This is demonstrated by the sense of smell, which is in fact

nothing more than contact of the nose with tiny particles floating in the air. In fact, as volcanic eruptions send

substances from the core of the Earth airborne, the atmosphere usually reflects the planet in its entirety. However, just

as the oceans differ from the land, so the atmosphere differs also, from both land and sea.

Land is composed of elements or molecular combinations that are either not water soluble, tend to cling to other

molecules to form a heavy settling substance, or are not exposed to enough water to leave its solid state. Under

constant rain, soil erodes, but likewise clumps and clings to other soil particles and thus again settles out. Metals

washed constantly with a liquid are found in that liquid, thus the concern for lead poisoning when drinking water

stands in lead pipes. Many factors affect whether a substance is found on land, in the sea, or in the air. If it clumps and

clings it will eventually be too heavy for anything but land or the sea floor. If it is a liquid at the temperatures normal

for the Earth it will find its way into the water systems, there to be evenly disbursed if water soluble or if not soluble to

form a separate layer in the water body such as oil on top or liquid mercury below.

An atmosphere is composed of those elements which can remain free or clump only to form tiny molecules, so big and

no larger. Water vapor is composed of two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen, and the three elements form a tight

band with little tendency to clump or cling unless other factors present. Similarly, any combination of elements that is

discrete will remain airborne. These tiny elements or discrete groupings of elements can include heavy metals, as the

winds that carry radioactivity across the land and sea after a nuclear explosion attest. Elements capable of being

radioactive are some of the heaviest known to man, yet there they are, wafting aloft.

The composition of atmospheres is dependent on wind action and air currents also. Some elements or groupings would

move lower within the atmosphere due to their relative weight, and some rise, due to being light, were the atmospheric

soup not constantly stirred. The Albatross, a giant bird of no small weight, soars almost endlessly on air currents above

the waves, its wings not moving for hours at a time. Atmospheric currents are affected by the warmth or coolness of

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s44.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:46 AM]

ZetaTalk: Atmosphere Building

the land or sea mass underneath, the density of air masses nearby, the pressure of any air masses moving toward or

away from the spot, and the temperature of the air mass itself as it is warmed by the Sun or cooled on the dark side of

the Earth - constantly stirred.

Thus, one should take care what they spew into the air - as it does not simply blow away.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s44.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:46 AM]

ZetaTalk: Sonic Booms

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Sonic Booms

Note: written on Oct 15, 1997.

Sonic booms occur, as you know, when air masses are split and then clap together. This occurs during thunderstorms

also, after lightning superheats the air so that a semi-vacuum occurs. The air turbulence around a plane about to create

a sonic boom is a combination of air pressure in front of the nose or wing, air pressure to the sides of the nose or

above or below the wing, and a subsequent lack or pressure behind the wing or tail of the plane. Please note this

uneven pressure, as it is the very same mechanism that causes thunder clapping. During thunder, lightning superheats

the air it travels through, causing expansion in the path traveled by the lighting. After the electricity stops flowing, the

state of the air is that superheated air has pushed away from the lightning path, creating a high pressure area at the

sides, and where the lightning passed there is now low pressure. The sides both move toward the low pressure,

resulting in two blocks of air bumping into each other and ricocheting away to eventually hit windows or ear drums and

result in comment about the thunder clap.

When airplanes “break the sound barrier” they are simply moving fast enough to create turbulence of a sufficient

degree that the air pressure closing in on relatively low air pressure places claps together, creating a reverberation that

moves toward human ears. Same principle as thunder, different reason for the air turbulence. Such a mass is one or

more of these high pressure masses moving outward from the fast moving plane or ricocheting off the earth and

returning to meet another high pressure air mass or flowing, as air masses will, to the place of least resistance, inward

toward the low pressure areas behind the plane’s wind and tail. Why do you suppose the term is “breaking” the sound

barrier, and not “reaching” the sound barrier if the sonic booms continue at all speeds?

Humans have reasoned that the lack of continuous booming is due to the plane accelerating and climbing, so that

booms occur at low altitudes and the lack of booms at high altitudes is due to the air turbulence dispersing or perhaps

the air being thinner. Rapidly traveling planes slice the air, reducing the disturbance they cause, where the plane

approaching the sonic boom point is pushing the air ahead of it, creating turbulence behind the plane and uneven

pressure around it. Planes going greater than supersonic speed no long cause a continuing sonic boom, as you also well

know. They zoom along, none the wiser on the ground unless they look up. This lack of clapping is due to slicing,

rather than pushing, the air masses apart. Cutting with a sharp knife versus cutting with the edge of a fork. With a

razor sharp knife, the mass being cut does not move, but with a dull fork, the mass being cut drags back and forth,

dragging all attached back and forth with it.

Entertain for a moment the sounds caused by drums, large and small. The booming of the base drum is cause by the

broad area vibrating, creating vibrations that cause relatively large masses of air to move at once, where the tiny drum

can barely be heard as it is moving a small air mass and the vibration is relatively rapid. If the vibration gets rapid

enough, the ear does not hear it at all, as the ear drum cannot vibrate in sync. Likewise very low frequency sounds are

not heard by humans, as the nerves to the ear are not attuned to the gaps in vibration. High or low frequency, thus, is

tuned out as noise of one kind or another, and is not considered sound. So what happens when the plane increases

speed past what humans erroneously call the sound “barrier”?

The turbulence is still there, but the adjustment to equalize the air pressure is faster, in step with the speed of the

plane. Where turbulence is still created, it does not travel far from the plane, as the plane is not in the vicinity

long enough to push it there.

The air is sliced apart, and before high pressure waves can travel outward, the plane is gone. Thus the air, briefly

separated, moves in the direction of least resistance, back toward the low pressure area behind the plane.

There is no wave of high pressure air traveling toward the ground, just mild turbulence behind the plane. Thus,

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s94.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:47 AM]

ZetaTalk: Sonic Booms

as we stated, our rapidly moving ships slice and mildly disturb the air, but do not create sonic booms.

Our ships are beyond the speed of your supersonic planes, from the moment they determine to move. Its as simple as

that, we skip the sonic boom period.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s94.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:47 AM]

ZetaTalk: Rotation

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Rotation

Note: written on Dec 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Rotation of a planet is dependent on many factors, only one of which is the initial motion attained coming out of a big

bang. Take the instance of your Earth, during the passage of her brother, the 12th Planet. Rotation slows and then

stops, for days, and then after passage resumes to the same pace as before. This is because of the other factors involved in rotation, which remain in place in your Solar System and have their grip on the Earth.

Rotation is due to a mobility difference between the core of a planet and the surface, and for lack of a better analogy

we relate this to a dog chasing its tail. The core of the Earth is liquid, and mobile, and has a mind of its own. As the

Earth moves in its orbit around the Sun, the relationship of the core of the Earth to surrounding influences changes. A

child standing on a merry-go-round and wishing to face his mother must himself turn a complete circle in order to do

this. In like manner, the heavy Core of the Earth moves to face or escape magnetically related forces in the Universe about your Solar System, dragging the surface with it. The core is not homogeneous everywhere and thus parts of it are

strongly attracted or repulsed to this part or that of the Universe about it, so motion in the core is constant. No sooner

does a part of the core move to the far side of its liquid tomb, then it finds itself presented with its old problem again,

and sets into motion once again.

Now as the Earth takes 365 days to orbit the Sun, and rotation happens once a day, it would seem at first glance that

the merry-go-round analogy is incorrect. How could rotation started because of the Earth's orbit, a yearly affair, turn

into a daily rotation? Motion is not a controlled matter, as anyone riding a bike without brakes is painfully aware. In

the liquid core of the Earth, there is little to stop motion, once started, save the desire of parts of the core to approach

or escape magnetic influences in the Universe. Rotation starts because of these external influences, and thus is always

in the same direction. The rate of rotation is due to the liquidity of the core, as the brakes are never applied. Thus, the parts of the core that are moving away from an influence soon find that they have created their problem again, as the

motion of the Earth has placed these parts back where they did not want to be! Round and round, like a dog chasing its

tail.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s45.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:48 AM]

ZetaTalk: Tides

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Tides

Note: written on Dec 15, 1995.

Humans have correctly ascribed the tides to the Moon's presence, but there they boggle. Is the water following the

Moon? Simply stated, yes. However, the process is not as simple as all that. The water follows the Moon, but when the

Moon goes off round the bend and its influence is obstructed by the body of the Earth itself, what then? Water seeks

its own level, and having heaped up on one side of a body of water, it sloshes back, momentum carrying it to an

extreme in the other direction. This momentum is in proportion to the speed of its original chase, mirroring this. Thus,

as fast as the water chased the Moon, it recedes. As the pull of the Moon was greatest while directly overhead, the high

tide chasing the Moon reflects the time only over half the body of water, an ocean, usually a 6 hour period. Thus, it

rushes back in an equal time span, another 6 hour or so period. Thus sloshing, the water finds itself receding again for

a third 6 hour or so period as the Moon hooves into influence again, but in keeping with its motion and speed, swings

back toward where the Moon reappeared and again chases the Moon to the horizon for the last 6 hour or so period.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s48.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:48 AM]

ZetaTalk: Auroras

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Auroras

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

One of the world's wonders is what is called the Van Allen belt, the Northern or Southern Lights, or Auroras as they

are variously called, a glorious panoply of colors across the northern or southern skies which play for hours at a time,

entertaining those who live in cold climates with one of the few delights that nature brings to their bleak, dark world.

What causes this natural wonder? There is in fact a great deal of speculation, and no proof, as one can scarcely put the

northern skies into a bottle for examination. The answer is simple, and not even among the candidates. The Auroras

are caused by refraction, a refraction not thought possible as no light seems to enter on the dark side of the Earth. Little

understood by humans is the degree to which energy particles are affected by gravitational pulls. They look out into the

sky, into the stars, and see a slight variance in light rays that come over the vastness of space, and assume a straight

path, or nearly straight. What they are in fact seeing is the light rays that have not been deflected. Others have been

captured, and pulled away from their path toward the Earth.

Our statement will elicit argument from astronomers, who will say that if this were the case, then the Earth would be

receiving light rays deflected from their path, and a confusing picture of the Universe would be presented, not the

steady consistency that they observe. They are of course assuming a constancy in the substance of light, which can be

altered as a substance just as any other. Do not the heavier particles that man is familiar with change radically their

behavior with the addition or subtraction of a subatomic particle at the core, or in the electrons circling the core? Man

assumes that light rays are constant only because they have not yet been able to dissect them. Light rays deflected are

in the process of being altered. And what has caused these light rays to be deflected at this point, to become Northern

or Southern Lights, and why no other point on the globe? In fact, they are being deflected elsewhere around the globe,

but are not visible because of the greater traffic in bright light. The Northern or Southern Lights, happening at the

equator, are lost in the glare.

Note: below added during the Dec 21, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.

The Auroras, as we have stated, are not magnetic at all but light rays bent by gravity. This has been much ridiculed as

it does not fit into the current human way of thinking. Light bends when going through water, bends in a prism, but

somehow the idea of light bending in other circumstances is ridiculous. The fact that mankind is even aware of a light

spectrum is because light bends. The rainbow, the prism, and suddenly there is a light spectrum. Red light bends

toward gravity pulls, as can be seen by the just rising or just setting sun, which broaden and enlarge. Light that is heading out into space, missing Earth altogether, is bend back down toward the earth to arrive at the eye of the

beholder. It arrives not where it would have if moving straight, but is bend back so is coming in from the sides, thus the fat sun. This also explains the red sunset and sunrise, as red light waves bend more than others.

Like magnetism, gravity flows are not universal about a body, but have a field. This is not widely noted, as it is slight, but has been noted recently in the discovery by mankind’s probes that the Earth's middle would seem to be fatter,

gravity wise, though no shape has changed. This hit the scientific news, a fact reported by the probes which no human

scientist had any explanation for. It was a change in the core of the Earth, which parts of the core are moving, and in

what directions, and this motion creating disruptions in the gravity field around the Earth. This is all to say that the

Auroras moving toward the Equator, should not be surprising, as the gravity flow back toward the Equator are

obviously increasing. The field has switched, more pull in at the Equator, so the light bending toward the gravity flow

is seen more toward the Equator.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s06.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:49 AM]

ZetaTalk: Planetary Magnetism

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Planetary Magnetism

Note: written on Feb 15, 1996. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Planets act as magnets in accordance with their composition and liquidity. In this regard the Earth is a magnet, as it

has a high concentration of iron in both its core and crust, and its core is fluid. The strongest magnets are produced

from softened or melted ore, as the atoms are free to line up end to end. The core of the Earth is perpetually in this

state, and thus it acts like a huge magnet, as large as the globe itself. Magnetic influences between planets are greater than humans imagine, because they use as their frame of reference objects on the surface. The Earth's crust is

magnetically diffuse, representing many different pole alliances over the eons, as magma hardened after volcanic

eruptions during pole shifts. The Earth's thick crust acts as a shield in this way, so that only sensitive needles on

compasses, floating freely, jiggle into alignment with the Earth's core.

A planet's magnetic influence is not encapsulated by its crust, but reaches beyond this even to the ends of the solar

system. Like the shields that men stood behind to watch an atomic blast, they may have avoided the radiation, but the

landscape behind them was devastated. The Earth's magnetism oozes around the various crustal plates acting as shields

to recreate its essential alignment out in space, considering any confusion the crust may have presented as no more

than an annoyance. A resonance is involved, so that the magnetic field can reestablish itself, filling in any blanks.

Thus, when magnetized planets encounter each other, such as when the 12th Planet passes near the Earth, the strength

of their reaction to each other is much greater than man might imagine.

Mankind's tiny magnets are but specks on the surface of thick crusts acting as shields. Below the surface, in the liquid

core of the Earth, and in resonance high above the surface, is where the real magnetic drama occurs.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s56.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:49 AM]

ZetaTalk: Gaseous Planets

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Gaseous Planets

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.

Gaseous planets work on the same principles driving their rotation, but due to the lack of a solid crust their cores and

atmospheres merge, where the rotation patterns on the surface of a planet with a solid crust is altered by the form and

shape that crust takes. In rotation within a liquid or mobile core, the rotation rate differs for the various parts of the

core. Rotation, as we have explained, is driven by parts of the core moving toward or away from elements outside of

the planet. Like runners in a race, some parts move faster and others more slowly, depending upon the strength of the

attraction or repulsion that is driving their motion within the core. There are also differences in mass, so that some

parts of the core float closer to the surface, and others fall to the center of the core. What does all this do to the

rotation of a gaseous planet, where the drama of rotation in the core expresses itself on the surface of the gaseous

giant?

Just as the oceans of the Earth pool about her Equator, due to being slung there by the motion of rotation, just so the

lighter elements in a gaseous planet pool about its equator, with the heavier elements lining up in bands toward the

poles. Motion in a liquid or gaseous core, once started, is driven also by the very motion itself. Around the equator, the

lighter elements rush to the surface, and there find they cannot leave due to the gravity pull of the planet, but also are

being pushed from behind by more of the same element rushing to the surface. What happens in a fast flowing river, to

the water along the banks which are being slung away from the pressure at the center? Eddy current occur, where the

pull of the flow at the center creates a relative vacuum in that there is a difference in water pressure along the fast

flow, so that water slung to the sides of the flow circle back into those spots of lesser water pressure. Likewise, eddy

currents occur in a gaseous planet’s latitude bands, so that the motion of rotation apparent on the surface appears to be

alternating bands with an east-west motion. The heaviest elements in such a planet pool at the core, and due to the

motion of rotation which slings the lighter elements toward the surface of the planet, these heavy elements also creep

up toward the poles. All else, the lighter elements, have left for the surface, and been pulled based on their relative

weight toward the equator of the planet. The poles, thus, reflect the overall rotation direction of the gaseous planet.

On Earth, these same patterns exist, but due to the buffering action of the crust the atmosphere operates independently.

Where the Earth moves under the atmosphere, the drag is from east to west, and as the atmosphere is not so inclined,

eddy currents, the prevailing westerlies, are created. Storms on Earth, created due to unequal pressure of air masses

and their relative humidity, last only as long as equalizing the factors takes - a matter of days. Storms on a gaseous

planet, noted by NASA in July, 2001 from recent images taken by a fly-by probe, seem to last for long periods. This is

because they are not driven simply by a thin and highly mobile air mass, but by elements disbursed in the entire core of

the planet. Equalization is not in a thin layer, but as deep as the planet itself, so the drama takes longer to resolve.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s115.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:50 AM]

ZetaTalk: Opposition

Mail this Page to a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Opposition

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Children playing with magnets soon discover that magnets brought in close proximity to each other want to snap

together, north pole to south pole, and can be positioned north pole to north pole only under force. Lined up side by

side, as long as a certain distance is maintained and friction against a table top or other surface is present, they can

coexist with without polar symmetry, however. Why the pressure to snap together and align when poles approach,

where not so in a side by side arrangement? An analysis of magnetic particle flow in magnets placed end to end show

the particles flow moving through the entire length of the linkup of magnets, creating a longer and larger field before the

particles return to the shared south pole at the end of the lineup. But what of the particle flow when magnets are

positioned side by side? The key here is the strength of the fields, and the closeness of the magnets.

If the magnets are of a strength and closeness to each other such that a returning particle finds itself fighting the

flow to do anything but go to the far edge of the overall mega-magnetic field created by the group, the magnets

will line up with their poles in the same direction.

If any of the magnets are of a significant strength, but the magnets are not so close that returning particles are

perforce forced to the outside of the overall mega-magnetic field created by the group, the returning particles will

take the path of least resistance and return via a magnet in opposition. In fact, this magnet will be in opposition in the grouping not because of its original orientation but because the returning flow creates a south pole handy to

the flow, establishing the magnetic orientation. This happens, not surprisingly, in gaseous planets as they have the

greatest mobility in their composition and the least resistance to change.

If the magnet in a side by side arrangement are at the greatest distance from the dominant magnet in the group,

they will align in orientation with that magnet as the overall flow of particles is such at the perimeter of the mega-

magnetic field such that the return south is sweeping like eddy currents at the very outside of all the magnets in

the group. There peripheral magnets thus align in the same direction as the dominant magnet.

When this path of least resistance is established in a gaseous planet, the magnetic particle flow takes a short cut to the

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s122.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:50 AM]

ZetaTalk: Opposition

south pole of the Sun, the dominant magnetic influence in the area. Those particles flowing through such a gaseous

magnet do not return to the south pole of the planet they have just passed through, but move along to the south pole of

the Sun. Magnetic fields are measured by man not by the flow of particles, but by the direction of the flow, as the

orientation is determined by which way a magnet swings under the influence of this flow. Thus, probes sent to measure

the magnetic field of a gaseous planet find their test magnets swinging into alignment, both the south pole of the

gaseous planet and the test magnet lined up to act as a conduit for the intense flow of magnetic particles on the move.

The fact that there is no actual field about the gaseous planet, no return from the north pole of the gaseous magnet to its south pole, is not noted.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s122.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:50 AM]

ZetaTalk: Earthquake Predictions

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Earthquake Predictions

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

We are not allowed to forewarn Earthlings of impending earthquakes to the extent they would like us to. The rules are

simple in this regard. For humans, on Earth at this time in the 3rd Density, earthquakes are a fact of nature, one that

creates many opportunities for them to sort out their spiritual orientation. Just watch how the populace responds after

an earthquake. Some people risk their lives dashing into shaky building to rescue others, and other people sit and

moan, waiting to be rescued. Many and great opportunities. However, lest some deem we, the Service-to-Other Zetas,

to be cold-hearted and cruel, be aware that this is not our rule, but a firm rule we must abide by as visitors to your

planet. No interference. Should we break this rule, we would no longer be allowed to be visitors.

With that in mind, we will tell you what we can. We cannot warn you ahead of time, saying, for instance, on such a

day, in such a place, at such a time, an earthquake of magnitude such will occur. However, we ourselves are able to

come close to this type of accuracy. Here's how we do it.

The Earth, as just about everyone knows, is covered by plates that move about and grind against each other. This

grinding action is described variously as a head-to-head push, a sliding under or over, or a gliding along the edge on

the way to someplace else. A place where this is occurring is called a fault line, as being a faulty place in the surface

of the Earth, one would assume. Now, where humans spend a lot of time sticking probes into the Earth, and trying to

guess at the tension deep underground and thus the probability of a near term earthquake, they would do better to place

the plate personalities into a computer and let the computer tell you where the next bust is going to be. How would this

be done? Humans have a pretty good handle on what the plates are, and where their boundaries are. Put that into the

computer. Humans also have a pretty good handle on the direction the plates are moving in, as they are staring at the

results after every earthquake. What they don't know is the degree of pressure, and how to restate this pressure after a

quake, which eases the tension in the surrounding rock.

This can be done mathematically, if one takes into consideration the following factors:

The size of the plate, as measured in a directly proportional way, i.e. as the surface area.

The thickness at the edge of the plate, as measured by instruments that gauge the depth of the bedrock, which we

deem fairly accurate as done by humans today, and, again, given a directly proportional weight.

The frequency of what is termed emergent electrostatic Screeches, a sound which can be detected by sensitive

humans, and much more accurately by sensitive instruments. We are speaking here of bursts of electrical energy,

which is invariably accompanied by other types of energy so that any number of them can be measured. This

should be weighted in a bell curve manner, so that every increase in frequency weighs in more and more

severely.

Tinker with this a bit. Test it against actual earthquake Data, which arrives daily from around the world. Try

prognosticating a bit, and get a reputation for accuracy. Whatever you do, don't just sit there doing nothing!

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s09.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:51 AM]

ZetaTalk: EQ Clouds

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: EQ Clouds

written Sep 21, 2004

What do the Zetas say about EQ clouds? Here are photos from Tokachi last Sep 26, 2003 when there was an

8.0 EQ. and another this Sep 4, 2004 when there was a 7.4 EQ.

Clouds certainly indicate what is going on in the atmosphere, and clearly indicate tornado potential when cloud layers are

moving in different directions overhead. Would clouds give indication of what is going on underground? It has been

reported that radios pick up static in the vicinity of a pending quake, due to the pressure the rock is under creating

particle flow bursts, electromagnetic in nature, thus static. Wave action in nature is the result of pressure buildup being

released in bursts, with a void following until another buildup occurs. Where normally clouds represent water vapor that

is being blown about by wind, when over land where particle bursts are coming out of the ground this wind is not merely

flowing over the land, but is affected by vertical bursts from the ground. All this is invisible to man, who cannot see the

air the bird is floating upon either. Animals who give heed to what they sense from the ground, unlike man who is asked

to deny his senses and hunches, know these particle flows are exploding in bursts ahead of quakes, and in those cultures

where common sense prevails, this is acknowledged to mean that pending quakes or certainly the likelihood of quakes as

the ground is under pressure, exists. Earthquake clouds, showing what cannot be seen in these particle flows, are visually

showing what these animals sense.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta158.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:52 AM]

ZetaTalk: Tunguska Explosion

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Tunguska Explosion

Note: written on Feb 15, 1996.

A source of endless speculation is the wide area of flattened trees, spread outward in a circle, the result of an apparent

explosion that occurred just after the turn of the century in Siberia. No witnesses, radioactivity, or meteor remains

seem to exist as pieces toward solving this puzzle. Nuclear power was not yet in mankind's hands. What occurred? The

Tunguska trees are devastated by an explosion that occurred close to the ground, as evidenced by the butterfly pattern

of trees knocked sideways. It was a huge cloud of well mixed methane and air, equivalent to all the natural gas being

piped about in the US at any given time, and the burn spread around this cloud or that, under and over and around,

until a particular pocket of well mixed methane and air had no where to go with its heat since the burn was all around.

Itself burning, the heat ramped the combustion up to the explosion level.

Methane gas occurs naturally, a result of the decomposition of organic materials. Landfills must vent this or experience

explosions. Some humans know they can light and briefly burn their farts. Humus or accidentally buried organic

material is a source of methane gas, and if not vented, this attempts to rise, being light, and will pool if trapped.

Siberia was once lush, a fact the carcasses of mastodons reveal, as their bellies are full of grass. Flash frozen and

covered with volcanic dust, organic material lies as a potential. Where Siberia may appear to be a frozen wasteland,

the center of the Earth is hot, and decomposition of trapped matter, proceeding slowly but over a long time, can

accumulate a large, trapped pool of methane gas. Released Due to a Shift in the Earth's crust and encountering a raise in temperature sufficient to act as a spark, this would explode, with the size of the explosion in proportion to the

volume of violently venting gas.

The burn was lit by the wick traveling back along the wisp of methane that had been blow up and southwest by the

prevailing westerlies over Siberia. What witnesses saw was the burn off of methane that had disbursed into the air and

was not sandwiched between burning masses so that its heat had nowhere to go, the basis of exploding, rather than

burning, gas bombs. The process was:

1. Methane gas hisses out from under frozen permafrost that had been cracked like a sheet of glass due to earth

stress, pre-shock to the earthquake that was recorded during the Tunguska explosion.

2. Methane gas mixes with the air as it rises, followed by more hissing air, so that a huge cloud of methane has

formed in the atmosphere over Tunguska, equivalent to all the natural gas at any given time in the US.

3. A wick of methane that has drifted upward and southeast, driven by the prevailing westerlies, is sparked due to

the air movement, the same process that causes lighting due to rapid air movement during storms.

4. The lit methane burns rapidly back along the wick, the "meteor" that was seen, lights all the gas that is

encountered but before all but the nearest witnesses can see it, those who died in the explosion, an overburn over

gasses closer to the surface prevents heat from rising and an explosive situation occurs.

The explanation that a meteor exploded above ground is an attempt by the establishment to avoid the methane gas, and

thus the pole shift and shifting crust issue. Comets and meteors do not explode when encountering Earth’s atmosphere.

This is not what your history or science presents to you! If they are monstrous, they plunge to Earth and leave a crater

such as the Gulf of Mexico off Yucatan. If they are tiny, they burn up in the atmosphere as shooting stars. If they are

midsized, they burn on their periphery but land to be rocks picked up and examined by your scientists. The lack of

meteor particles or dust proves that it was not an exploding meteor. Methane, once burned or disbursed into the air,

leaves no trace. Meteors leave traces, methane does not.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s57.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:52 AM]

ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids

Note: written on Jul 15, 1996.

Recently the media and Internet message boards have been alerting the populace to the presence of what is termed

near-miss asteroids. Discussion ensues on how to deflect them should they threaten to impact the Earth, as though

deflection would be possible. Does mankind now have the means to deflect such large, rapidly moving objects? Such a

deflection would require a precisely placed explosive device of sufficient strength to vaporize the asteroid.

Disintegration would be required because deflection is not possible in space. This statement will meet with vehement

objection, especially from the arm of the establishment which seeks only to deflect panic in the populace. It is not a

collision with an asteroid which will shortly devastate Earth, it is the passage of the monster 12th Planet, ever drawing

closer. Nor will deflection of the trash in this giant comet's tail be possible - boulders as large as trucks thumping to

Earth on occasion and the peppering of red dust and gravel. Deflection of these few boulders is not possible either, as

they are shrouded in the swirling dust of the tail, and only visible just before impact.

Deflection of large objects traveling in space or plummeting to Earth must address several problems.

The object is traveling because it is caught in a gravitational attraction. This might not be the case in deep space,

but within the Solar System this is most certainly the case. If an asteroid is heading toward Earth, bumping it to

the side a bit or even temporarily stopping its motion is at best a delaying action. The asteroid will resume its

path, as the factors that influenced the path in the first place are still there.

Attempting to aim the asteroid so it falls in the ocean has the potential for making matters worse, not better.

Unlike the winged space shuttles, which can start their descent path at precise points and behave predictably,

asteroids do not take orders or respond to controls. They are odd shaped, their shape an unknown variable. They

may or may not burn fiercely, a heated air factor that is not known. They may circle or plummet, depending on

their weight and size, more unknown variables. Thus attempting to steer them could prove disastrous. Oops,

dropped it it right on the Pentagon!

A nuclear explosion set off on the surface of an object in space would have minimal effect, as the explosion can

expand in all directions at once. Nuclear explosions on the Earth's surface are an irresistible force meeting an

immovable object - the Earth! Where the explosion can expand up or outward into the atmosphere there is only

air turbulence. The portion of the explosion that is on the land side, or in the case of an underground explosion is

encapsulated, is between a rock and a hot expanding place. The explosion is forced into the rock strata by the

continuously expanding center of the explosion. Solid rock vaporized by nuclear explosions on the Earth's

surface does not equate to the damage that would be done by one or even many nuclear devices on the surface of

an asteroid. All parts of the explosion move rapidly out into space, and thus the asteroid is safely away before

the nuke really gets going. A firecracker. A gnat. A sneeze. And the asteroid proceeds on its way, having only

momentarily stepped aside to avoid mankind's silly experiment.

All the sudden upsurge in talk about the dangers asteroids present, and all the talk in the late 1990's about reviving the

Star Wars program to address this threat is not because something can actually be done. Short of making practical

plans to survive the coming pole shift while hunkered down on the surface of the Earth, mankind has no options, and

those in the establishment who talk up asteroid deflection possibilities know this. They are simply buying themselves

time by pushing the point where panic in the populace gets heated as far out as possible. Hopefully, the panic button

won't be hit until those members of the establishment are safely away in their well stocked enclaves, and then the rest

of humanity, who has been reassured that their government can protect them, be damned.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s74.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:53 AM]

ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s74.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:53 AM]

ZetaTalk: Light Particles

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Light Particles

Note: written on Feb 15, 1997.

In the recent past, humans considered the world around them to be composed of either mass or energy, energy being

anything they could not put their hands around. Only within the past century has the notion that both mass and energy

are solid particles become widely accepted. Energy is just really small stuff, moving fast. Increasingly, the really small

stuff is identified, at least in theory as it is too small to be observed directly. The clues, for humans struggling to

understand the world around them, lies in the behavior of small particles under different circumstances. Light is not

composed of a singular particle, but dozens of particles, thereby accounting for much of what humans call the strange

behavior of light.

Rainbows are caused by the various particles responsible for what humans call color, the color of an object being

determined by which particle is overwhelmingly present in the flood of particles striking the eye. Diffraction of

light in water laden air following a rain storm results in what humans call a rainbow, where the eye perceives

light particles sorted out by the degree, or angle, of diffraction from one side of the rainbow to the other.

Auroras, colorful light displays of waving banners across the northern or southern skies, are caused by the

susceptibility of the various particles to the gravitational pull from the Earth. These light displays are visible to

humans where the glare of sunlight does not drown them out, as the eye registers the overwhelming particle

nature of the light flood, discarding minor particles that might be present as so much noise.

Brilliant sunsets and dawns have been assumed by humans to be caused by dust suspended in the air, when of

course those dust particles are present during the day as well and cause no such color variation. The human eye

receives in the dim light of dawn or dusk an overwhelming flood of light composed of particular particles which

are more prone to bend toward the gravitational pull of the Earth than other particles. Thus the sunset or dawn is

most brilliant at a point just before or after the full glare of sunlight, when the particle flood is strong but is not

mixed in with competing light particles to the point of being drown out.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s90.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:53 AM]

ZetaTalk: Light Particle Bonds

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Light Particle Bonds

written Apr 22, 2004 during godlikeproduction.com message board debates on why light bends toward a gravity sink

In trying to understand the behavior of light particles, which are many and not a single particle, humans boggle. They

ascribe the various colors to speed of vibration, the wave pattern high or low, long or short. The breaking of a ray of

sunlight going through a prism into a rainbow of colors is thus ascribed to a change in speed or a modified wave

pattern, as though a sub-atomic particle is forced to compact and squeeze in some invisible tunnel. Does glass have

invisible tunnels they force light rays into, or the ability to hold light particles back so they compress? They speak of

reflection or refraction of light as though it were an object bouncing, which sub-atomic particles do not do unless a

direct repulsion occurs. Are light particles repulsed by the sub-atomic qualities of a silver backed mirror, such that

they bounce? They ascribe the Auroras to an attraction by light particles to electro magnetic particle, such that they

dance, apparently, only at the poles, but balk at giving this attractive quality to gravity. The orange light that floods the

sky at sunrise and sunset is ascribed to dust, of all things, with no explanation of why this spectrum is so affected but

the other spectrums not. The huge size of a light emitting object such as the Sun coming over the horizon, in conflict

with established human explanations, is rejected. If it conflicts with the current establishment line, it did not occur, and

they call anyone saying otherwise deluded.

Why does light reflect from some surfaces, absorb into others, or change color when emerging from a prism? And

what does this have to do with the obvious bending of orange/red light over the surface of the globe, as seen at sunrise

or sunset? Is there a relationship? There is indeed. Some sub-atomic particles, a ready example being the many

particles in the electro-magnetic arena, flow together, are attracted to each other, and are incited to move with each

other by that attachment. Man thinks of electrons as being one sub-atomic particle and has barely considered

magnetism to be a particle flow, yet these particles number in the hundreds, and are not all the same in their behavior.

Light particles, thus, are immense in their numbers, and the various wave forms with resulting color signature

recognized by a retina only one example of the many. Do these light particles like to flow with one another, being

attracted to one another in a similar manner to the electro-magnetic particles? Obviously.

And as we have described, they flow not in a straight line, not in a wave form, but in a twisted cable form. Like the

Moons of Planet X, they swirl about each other in a double helix pattern, neither escaping or bonding, in perpetual motion. These helix strands likewise coil around other strands, often in a criss-cross pattern depending upon how much

distance the strands need from each other. Like electrons that chase but do not catch each other, and magnetons that

are likewise always in motion and cannot stand crowding but likewise desire to clump, this is a dance that never ends,

perhaps by God’s design. Where electrons can be caught and reside around the nucleus of an atom, and magnetons are

normally humming about the nucleus of an atom, the flow of light particles is an aberration of their normal abode,

within and around a nucleus. They emerge when this nucleus is flooded with particles and are pushed out due to

crowding, due to pressure which crowds them or the application of heat which is in and of itself a particle flow, or the

introduction of some bonded atoms that act as a catalyst for change. Light can be produced by friction, heat, emerges

during fire, or by chemical mix, as man knows.

When the twisted coil is on the move it, as a group, moves in the direction that they particles were flung in by the

explosion of particle crowding they were escaping. The direction of the light ray. When many particles are involved,

this is considered by man to be white light, all color spectrums included, as the colors emerge when this white light is

separated into its parts. The helix coils have another direction, other than the overall direction, which is straight ahead.

They are moving away from, and back toward, the pairing particle in their coil. Depending upon the particle, this coil

is tight or loose, with a wide wave length or short, and involves many other coils tightly attracted to it or few. When

encountering other matter, these particle pairs find themselves in a marital crisis. One of the pair wants to have an

affair with the other matter encountered, lingering, while the other partner cannot because the pair would then be too

close, too crowded. Thus, the particle lingering forces the partner to exit the coil, suddenly, in the manner of their

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta91.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:54 AM]

ZetaTalk: Light Particle Bonds

original expulsion from some comfortable atom into a light ray direction. The exiting particle of the pair leaves,

likewise, in a direction that creates the least crowding for it with the other helix coils they are entwined with.

Thus, white light entering a prism of glass finds that the most vulnerable particle to an attraction affair lingers and

expels its partner first. These particles having peeled off, the next most vulnerable particle is exposed to the adulterous attraction of some quality of glass, and lingers and expels its partner. This process proceeds until there is only the helix

coils of those light particles that are resistant to attraction, by being so tightly bound to the coils, and resist the

flirtations of nearby particles inherent in the glass. Some material simply absorbs the light rays by preventing them

from leaving, an affair that has become a new marriage of sorts. Some material is so attractive that the lingering

partner and expulsion proceeds at an almost violent pace, considered a complete reflection surface by man. When light

coils pass over a gravity giant such as a planet, it is not the long distance call of a lover they are listening to when they

curve toward that giant, it is the flow of gravity particles flowing back toward the planet. These are encountered on the way, slow the flow of those parts of the coil that are most attracted to the gravity particles, causing them to separate

from the other parts of the larger intermeshed coil. This separation is not violent or sudden, as adjustments are made

during the bumping process so the coils of those particles wanting to pull along with the flow of gravity eventually

find themselves outside of the larger coil, and free to move in independent helix coils. Thus where white light, or light

in color spectrums not susceptible to gravity particle attraction, move forward in their straight line path, the red

spectrum light susceptible to gravity pulls toward the gravity particles drifting back to their gravity sink, and are bent thus, toward the gravity giant.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta91.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:54 AM]

ZetaTalk: Red Shift

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Red Shift

Note: written on Feb 15, 1998. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Regarding the red color that the 12th Planet emits. This is due to the majority light particle that emits, a flood that to your eye or imaging equipment dominates and then becomes the color of record. It is not the only color arriving from

that source. It is a particle, a light particle, operating at a certain frequency. That's all. Leaving or approaching, the

same. The variation of light you note on leaving or coming pertains to accumulation of particles, as on the approach

there is a tendency for an accumulation of certain particles, which bounce around and create a dominance. Upon

leaving, the opposite effect is noted.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s95.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:55 AM]

ZetaTalk: Gravity Particles

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Gravity Particles

Note: written on Jan 15, 1997.

Gravity is particles, moving, just as magnetic fields are, and there is a polarization in gravity, which we have explained as the repulsion force. Before mankind discovered that magnetism was polarized, they discovered it as an attractive

force. Metallic items stuck to the sides of magnetized rock - how curious. After centuries of digging about in this

phenomena, humans have satisfied their curiosity to the extent that they understand that magnetism is a force field, has

a flow out from one pole and in at the other pole, that the Sun and some other planets are magnetized and line up with

each other. They still don't understand the cause of this force field, or its nature. Magnetism is caused by a particle, in motion, as we have explained. What other explanation is there for a force that reaches out and affects another? Magic?

The bi-polar aspect of magnetism is only apparent when what occurs in nature can be countered in the laboratory. You

force magnetized objects to do what they do not want to do - touch north pole to north pole or vice versa. Then you can observe the bi-polar nature. In gravity, you are seeing but one aspect in the positioning of the planets, and dealing with

a phenomena that does not lend itself to easy experimentation. However, experimentation is possible, in space and

away from the surface of the planet. The repulsion force fills the gap in some of your other theories where you have no

explanation for discrepancies.

In magnetism, the simple flow of particles creates more than a force for alignment, it creates an attraction. The gap is

filled. Like water in a stream, where flotsam eventually lines up in the center, evenly spaced, just so magnetized

objects do not keep their distance when free to move. They approach each other, and attach like a string of pearls.

Likewise the phenomena of gravity, where the desire to fill the gap causes objects to approach one another. It is only

where this gap is overfilled, by the presence of two large objects coming near, that the repulsion force is expressed.

There is no room for the flow of gravity particles, so the objects stay apart!

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s87.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:55 AM]

ZetaTalk: Gravity Flow

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Gravity Flow

Note: written on May 15, 1998. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The flow of gravity particles is not unlike the magnetism model, but with several significant differences. In

magnetism, particle flow is related to the shape of atoms, such as iron, which allow a flow to begin in the first place,

and is related to the types of bonds these atoms commonly lock themselves in. Magnetic particles surge out of a break

in the rhythm of subatomic particles such as electrons circling the nucleus, a surge which does not occur in other

atoms that have a more even balance in their halo of orbiting electrons. Magnetism thus produces a field, with a flow,

and this flow is discernible to the degree that one could almost imagine a river, watching magnetized particles on the

river position themselves according to the flow.

Gravity particles produce a flow but produce no discernible flow, and have no irregularities in the pattern. Does your

Earth not pull evenly from all parts of its surface? And if there is a flow, then at what point does the flow reverse,

such that surface particles are pushed away? In fact there is a reversal, but the outward streams are propelled, with a

force and at a speed so much greater than the downward drafts that this occurs over less of a surface area and without

engaging the mass of the object. A laser of gravity particles, versus a floodlight upon the return. So why would the

weight of returning particles be the only ones mankind is aware of, and why would they not feel the violent lift of the

updrafts? The updrafts blast through, tearing a hole as it were, where the returning particles do not tear what they press upon, and so have the greater effect.

Gravity particles, in their motion, do not affect what they move against or through, the effect being in essence

mechanical. The upward drafts push aside other matter, letting it return upon completion of the updraft, leaving no

trace of the temporary tear. The downward push of gravity particles returning to the large mass they are attracted to,

the core of the Earth for instance, spread out upon objects they encounter, taking some time to drift through these

object and with a constant downward press during the motion of this drift. Thus, returning particles, due to the time

they spend upon and within the surface objects, and due to their continual direction of motion, are a mechanical force

that is stronger, overall, than the updraft of particles that quickly pass through the surface objects, essentially pushing

them aside rather than engaging them.

The nature of this gravity flow is what determines the repulsion force we speak of. It is a complement of gravity only

when large bodies are close to each other. The updrafts, when encountering a large body also exuding updrafts of

gravity particles, hold the bodies apart. This occurs at what humans would call a distance from each other, as small

objects such as satellites do not exude updrafts and if far enough from the surface of a gravitational giant such as a

planet, find a down-draft and updraft of gravity particles in balance, what humans might term in their ignorance a zero

gravity field, weightlessness. At this point the updrafts are still tearing through, but at a slower rate, so that a

mechanical push upward is involved, and the down-drafts are more thinly dispersed over the surface as they work their

way through the density of these objects in space. Large bodies, exuding their own updrafts of gravity particles, create

a situation where their updrafts and the updrafts from another sun or planet bump against each other, creating a buffer

and preventing the gravity masses from touching or even approaching each other except at great distances.

Within black holes, the down-draft still exceeds the updraft, and thus the same rules apply.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s96.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:56 AM]

ZetaTalk: Galaxies

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Galaxies

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.

The Repulsion Force is what keeps suns apart, at the distance they are, or at least is a factor in this. The reach of the

force of gravity is immense, as with the distance that light particles travel, but like light particles gravity particles on

the move can be deflected. Light particles reaching man from across the galaxies has moved in essentially a straight

path, unless being deflected or absorbed by something in its path. What is the drama that occurs when more than two

gravity giants are in a vicinity, and why is it that binary suns are so common?

Gravity particles with a single gravitational giant in the vicinity float into the giant and spurt out, without

conflict. At the end of a spurt, their desire to clump with their kind causes them to return to the nearest clump.

This could be equated to light escaping from a Black Hole, where it is on the move but not leaving, rather

returning. The fact that other gravity particles in the vicinity are returning is no small part in this, as those in the

flow are attracted to one another also, so the particles at the end of a spurt find they also are moving toward the

gravitational giant as a result of trying to move to gravity particles nearby.

When there are two gravitational giants of equal size, as in binary suns, the drama is joined by a dither point

between the two. Gravity particles at the end of a spurt, or slowing in their exit due to reduced pressure as

dissipation occurs, find a mixture of streams going back to both giants at this dither point. Repulsion outbursts

are intermittent, so at one time the dither leans more toward one giant where a return flow is ongoing, but at

another time the return stream to the other giant is stronger, and a particular gravity particle switches to flow into

and out of the other sun. Where the suns are matched in size, they stay apart where the Repulsion Force keeps

them, to the extent that their dance is dominated by gravity.

Gravity particles streaming in an outburst from a giant but not encountering another outburst from a nearby giant

can move outward to a great distance. This is dependent upon the force with which they are expelled from the

giant, giving them great momentum. At the same time, the single drama of each gravity giant continues, and any

binary dance that has developed between balanced suns continues, so the particles escaping the area are those not

caught in other dramas. Gravity attraction is a small factor in slowing the escape of matter ejected during a Big

Bang, and bringing this together again during a collapse, ultimately into another immense Black Hole. Other

subatomic particles are more significant in the dance between galaxies, however. Gravity dances tend to be a

local affair.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s117.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:56 AM]

ZetaTalk: Particle Flow

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Particle Flow

Note: written on Feb 15, 1997.

Magnetic particles flow from the nucleus and back into the nucleus on the other side of the atom. Where the iron atom

is among others in a fluid state, such as liquid metal when heated, the flow moves from one atom’s outlet point to the

intake point of another atom nearby, thus magnetized iron. Humans have learned to magnify and set the direction in

this liquid iron by setting a strong magnet alongside, creating yet another magnet in the process. Some humans are

confused by our magnetism cycle description of 3 groups of 3 in a cycle of 10, or 4 groups of 3 in a cycle of 12. A

cycle is a completed electron or other subatomic particle pattern around the nucleus of an atom. Equate the subatomic

magnetic particles and their pattern, for simplicities sake, to sub-way trains leaving the central station to go out into

the suburbs and then returning. Normally the train schedules are regular, continuous, but in some cities they become

infrequent during the middle of the day or middle of the night, when there are expected to be few travelers. There may

even be breaks in the pattern so that shift turnover can occur, or maintenance. Now, equate the flow of magnetic

particles from the nucleus to the steady press of passengers, and assume a steady flow arriving at the central station.

Assume that these passengers, like subatomic particles, do not care which direction they go in. If the trains are kept

running at an even pace, there would at no time be an accumulation of passengers during one portion of the 24 hour

day than another. The train loads would be equalized, or close to that.

Gravity acts in a mechanical fashion, failing to interact with all but a handful of sub-atomic particles, so being an

independent particle on the move both the downward drift and upblasts push aside atomic structures in their path. The

particle flow of gravity particles is rapid, and the interaction with other particles essentially mechanical, so the bulk of

interactions is out from a gravity giant and back into that giant. The reason the updraft is faster is not only due to the pressure that occurs when a press finds an outlet, but due to the pathway that is arranged. Like water spouting from a

breach in a dam, this moves faster not only because of the pressure, but because the flow itself provides a type of

vacuum behind it, sucking in what would fill that vacuum. The force of the flow keeps the atomic structures which

have been pushed aside to the side, and this likewise allows the intensity of the updraft to continue until abated. Thus,

the exit has a greater speed, while the entry spreads its mechanical press downward over a larger area, and for a longer

time.

Relative to the slow drift of gravity particles downward, the outward bursts are 4.87235 time faster. Compared to the

speed of light, gravity particles move more slowly. If gravity moves at a rate of 1, light is a rate of 9.87104, a ratio

putting gravity at approximately 1/10 of the speed of light. We use the imagery of two fire hoses pointed at one

another to explain when the Repulsion Force kicks in. The water flow from such a hose is high pressure, as the stream

is to reach to the top of buildings, optimally, and carries a lot of water so as to put out the fire. If the firemen holding

these two hoses stand close together, they had better have their shoes nailed to the floor, as the push back is strong.

Moved further apart, they find a couple things changing, so holding the hoses is still difficult, but the push back has

reduced. First, the water pressure in the stream has reduced due to spray to the side as well as straight ahead, relieving

the pressure. Second, the water stream has spread to the sides, and increasingly as water is lost in spray, the amount of

water is reduced.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s88.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:57 AM]

ZetaTalk: Energy Waves

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Energy Waves

Note: written on Feb 15, 1997.

In the last few centuries, mankind has moved:

1. from a concept the world around him being composed of solids, liquids, air, and a spirit form,

2. to thinking of the Universe around him being composed of matter, energy, and a spirit form,

3. to thinking of matter and energy being composed of the same substances - subatomic particles.

In fact, everything perceived, including spirit forms, can be assumed to be particular in nature, although we, the Zetas,

cannot speak to the issue of the composition of spirits, what we call the stuff of souls, as we ourselves do not have this

information to share with mankind. Of this we are ignorant. Mankind has lately begun subdividing the atom into

assumed subatomic particles, and increasingly speaking of energy as particles moving rapidly in a wave pattern with

varying wave pattern height, width, and speed or what humans call frequency. The fact that energy may be a subatomic

particle found in matter, on the move, is increasingly accepted. However, just why it is on the move, and why it moves

in waves, is still a bit of a mystery.

In discussions of subatomic particle movement, an analogy to the behavior of liquids might help humans relate.

Humans are aware that water can appear to be a solid, when ice, or on the move, when a liquid. They are also aware

that water can take up less space when cold and more when warm, having what is called heat energy stuffed into the

same space. This same concept can be applied to what humans call matter and energy, energy simply being particles of

matter on the move, and on the move because other particles have been stuffed into the same space. The space

becomes crowded, and just as circulation in water is caused in part by temperature differences, just so subatomic

particles go on the move to equalize the crowding at the atomic level.

Coming out of what is called a big bang, particles are sent in all directions. All are on the move. As explosions are

never of equal strength throughout the explosion, some particles are moving faster than others, and when parts of the

explosion collide with other parts, toward the center of the explosion or on the periphery, circular movement begins to

equalize the pressure. After a time, what results is what you see in your Universe. All this moving about never settles

down, nor does it diminish or increase, overall. Mankind has noted this tendency and termed it conservation of energy.

Even within forming black holes movement is still occurring, and in accordance with the patterns outside of black

holes.

Within atoms, subatomic particles are bound to the nucleus just as planets are bound to a sun, due to the presence of a

subatomic particle which behaves in a similar manner to gravity particles in a solar system. Forever on the move as

rushing to the center of the nucleus creates crowding that is relieved by an outward flow, these particles soon find

themselves on the periphery in an uncrowded state and cycle back into the nucleus due to their inherent attraction of

each other. What all matter seeks is a static state where all parts of it are equal and none moving, like a jell, but as

equality in matter can never exist due to inherent differences in particle size and nature, motion never ceases. Always

trying, but never succeeding.

Subatomic particles move in a wave pattern due to this attraction and desire to equalize crowding. Vacillation,

repeating patterns, occur often in Nature, as the buildup is followed by the gradual drop, until a threshold is reached

and the buildup begins again. Pulsing is found in the cosmos, dying stars pulsing, the heartbeat pulsing, and in like

manner subatomic particles pulse. The same mechanism is at play, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the rate of

release from a source, the current fanciful explanation by scientists. Space, even the space within an atom, is scarcely

empty, but is filled with all manner of tiny particles as yet undiscovered by man. Many particles or groups of particles

follow a path less than straight, as on their way they create a pressure in front of them, causing a sideways zig, only to

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s91.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:57 AM]

ZetaTalk: Energy Waves

find they again create a pressure in front of them so must zag. This path is not chaotic, but becomes a zig-zag line in a

straight direction, as the pressure created on the left encourages the zig to the right, and the pressure created on the

right finds a void on the left where an essential vacuum has just been created. The zig-zag perpetuates itself.

Mankind assumes that a single particle is moving in a wave, with one particle following another obediently in a kind

of waving line. Yes and no, this is what occurs. If only two particles were on the move, moving in the same direction

as the reason for motion was the same for both, then they would institute a dance much as binary stars institute. They

are interacting with each other while simultaneously being affected by many other factors. These two particles move

apart from each other to reduce crowding but then find they are attracted to each other when crowding has been

reduced and move toward each other again. Wave action is not at all what humans presume, a single wave motion. It is a multiplicity of motions, all at the same wave height and width and frequency. If humans could view this drama,

they would see not a wave, but what appeared to be a tube.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s91.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:57 AM]

ZetaTalk: Ball Lightning

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Ball Lightning

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.

Man is aware of electricity primarily from his experiences with lightning and the tiny lightning, arcs, that occur from

static electricity. Were it not that lightning, in its many forms, pressed itself on mankind, experiments with electricity would not have proceeded. Man wished to harness its light-giving qualities, and the widely used light-bulb is the

result. But there are some 387 discrete sub-atomic particles composing what man understands to be the flow of

electrons or a magnetic field. Each operates differently, but most are not so obvious as the electron, the stage-master

throwing lightning bolts at the audience. What are some of the other components of electricity and magnetism, some of

the other sub-atomic particles, and how do they cause ball lightning?

Anti-Gravity Effect

As we have explained, there is a sub-atomic particle responsible for the magnetic behavior of certain metals like

iron. This flows from and through those atoms that have an uneven distribution of electrons circling around the

core, so the field develops around a single atom but the flow of this particle causes them all to line up in liquid

iron so as a group they have a field where the flow of particles leaves one end of the field and warps around to

the place where they are least, Nature abhorring a vacuum of any type. This type of flow can raise high speed

trains on a rail, as in what is termed Magnetic Levitation, so it could certainly float eggs or humans during the

phenomenon known as ball lightning. The question that begs to be answered is - why do the magnetic particles

hang around, and not disperse, as they apparently do under other circumstances. After all, electro-magnetic

motors are in common use and a single report of levitation has yet to be recorded.

Ball Formation

Mankind is aware of the brief distances and the intense electron press required to support arcs such as arc

welding or carbon arc lamps. They are aware of the distance that lightning, representing a buildup of electrons in

the atmosphere, can move. In general this is at most for a distance along the horizon but most often simply

downward to a discharge point. In fact, this is only the visible lightning, and arcs can and do occur over longer

distances and with less electron press than presumed, but this type of activity is not showy and thus escapes

mankind’s notice. But ball lighting hangs together, is not moving, it would seem, from a high charge to a lesser

charge, the normal distribution of electrons that is so familiar and runs all manner of handy appliances. Consider

that an electrically charged field may be immense, covering the horizon that can be seem from end to end, and

rising for miles up into the sky. Consider that within this charged field, there are not simply electrons and the

particle that creates the phenomenon of magnetism, but all the other 387 particles that operate in a similar

manner, each with its own desire to equalize its distribution in the vicinity. Ball formation occurs when the

particles that would disperse are forced to remain in the vicinity by a greater pressure from other particles

surrounding them.

Light Suppression

Light bends, as anyone looking at their feet while standing in water is acutely aware. Light particles are quick,

and are used by Nature as the basis of sight because most of them escape and go in a straight line, but they are

not so quick as to escape influence. In Black Holes, so few escape that the hole is identified by their absence.

Gravity is assumed to be the shackle holding them, but in fact there is a phenomena of light that a mass of these

particles in and of itself is the draw that pulls nearby light particles into itself. Then why does light seem to

move in a straight line, from heat and light and electricity generating situations? They bolt, do they not? From

stars and explosions and fire, they are on the run, or so it would seem. Light particles as many other particles

types form waves because of a constant attraction/repulsion dance they assume with each other. They run from

and yet run toward each other, always wanting homogeneity of their quality but never able to achieve this. The

dance that particles form in this effort is the wave identified as a light wave. So why does light move long

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s114.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:58 AM]

ZetaTalk: Ball Lightning

distances, then, during this dance? Momentum from an explosion of other particles has put them on the move.

But in ball lightning, where an immense area is affecting particle equalization, these other particles cannot

disperse, or explode, as they might otherwise. It is a delayed explosion, so the light being generated within the

ball can do what it normally does - clump!

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s114.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:58 AM]

ZetaTalk: Ice Formation

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Ice Formation

Note: written on Feb 15, 1997.

Humans are aware that during molecular changes, rapid expansion can and does occur. Explosions are such a situation.

Subatomic particles bound closely to the nucleus of atoms go on the move, and bump each other during this activity,

so the exploding mass as a whole requires more space. There is pressure outward. But explosions seem to be

accompanied by heat, where the formation of ice crystals seems to be due to the lack of heat. So why would ice

crystals expand, requiring greater space than the liquid state just before? Gaze at a drop of water and the same water

molecules represented as fluffy snow. Snow, as the weary crews that plow roads in winter are painfully aware, takes up

so very much more space. Several feet of snow, when melting in the winter, end up representing only a few inches of

rainwater.

Heat is composed of several subatomic particles that act as a lubricant for molecular motion, where atoms change their

position with respect to one another. Thus, as is well known by humans, hot metal or rock can become liquid. The lack

of heat particles creates a situation at a certain point where atoms are pressed against each other, and a different drama

ensues. Just as within explosions, where subatomic particles on the move require more space than in the prior, pre-

explosive state, just so the near proximity of other atoms can create this need for more space. The loss of heat does not

necessarily accompany this expansion, as the processes are separate though often occur simultaneously. In the case of

ice formation, there is a steady lose of heat during the freezing process, however, so to some degree one might call the

formation of ice a controlled explosion.

What occurs at the point that freezing water turns to ice is that subatomic particles trapped within each water particle

are encouraged to move into areas formerly occupied by heat. Like children under a teacher's thumb while at their

desks, when the teachers are elsewhere, they scamper out into the halls to play. They no longer bump into heat

particles flowing between atoms when the normal course of their movement within the water atoms brings them to the

periphery. Just as in an explosion, where the rearrangement of particles at the atomic level requires more space, just so

the quiet explosion that freezing water represents requires more space. The water atoms are now increasingly sharing

subatomic particles, which move to the periphery of an atom and loop through and around other atoms before

returning. Thus the atoms become bound to each other by the wash of this motion, and become static ice!

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s92.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:58 AM]

ZetaTalk: Explosions

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Explosions

Note: written on Mar 15, 1997.

Humans are most aware of atoms bonding due to the sharing of electrons, but bonding due to sharing of the many

other subatomic particles on the move around the periphery of the atom also occur. During explosions, a bonding

process begins and does not end until an equilibrium is established. The addition of heat to spark an explosion or

compression both result in the same atomic drama - heat particles and other subatomic particles flood a given atom in

excess of what the surrounding areas contain, and these particles go on the move. At the point where this wave of

motion is traveling outward, a temporary liquidity of atoms is created, as the heat particles form a type of lubricant, so

the atoms have mobility beyond their prior state.

Suddenly freed from the prior bonding, atoms on the edge of the wave find themselves free to form new bonds, which

they do in accordance with their chemical nature, i.e. their ability to hold subatomic particles such as electrons based

on the weight and composition of the nucleus. This new bonding results in excess heat particles, which now do not

have room due to the new bonding arrangement, and the explosion process is acerbated. Where the new bonding has

been facilitated by the lubrication factor of excess heat, heat particles are not the dominant factor in the new bonding.

Other subatomic particles, such as electrons, dominate and dictate the bonding process.

If the chemical mix is such that this re-bonding is just waiting to happen, inhibited only due to the strength of the prior bonds, then it is, as you say, an explosive mixture. This is why certain chemicals or chemical mixes are handled with

care, and others are not deemed capable of engaging in an explosion. Those chemical mixes that result in an explosion

even without the addition of heat or compression are a mixture of atoms prone to many bonding combinations. They

enter the explosion bonding in a manner that is less stable than the new potential bond, which they rapidly migrate to,

causing the familiar release of heat and light particles.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s93.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:59 AM]

ZetaTalk: Subatomic Particles

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Subatomic Particles

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

At one point in the not too distant past humans thought of matter as a substance, like wood, water, air, or sand.

Common folk, of course, deal with matter in this way still. In addition to matter, there was energy, like light or radio

waves. Theoretical physicists concluded, based on the observable and measurable chemical, electromagnetic, and

fractal qualities of matter, that an atomic structure existed. In those days the concept was simple, involving an atomic

nucleus with orbiting electrons, but the concept has rapidly evolved to include dozens of theoretical subatomic

particles, and since Einstein's theories have become acceptable, the concept of energy as being, in fact, just rapidly

moving small bits of matter.

How close are the many theories of man to the Zeta understanding? In concept, humans are on the right track, but in

detail they are not yet half right. For instance, humans are searching for a quark, a particle that would make their

formulas work, where no such particle exists. The fault is in the formulas, not in the elusive quark. The formulas to be

made whole by the elusive quark have invented the quark, which takes shape only to fill the void, to balance the

equation. There is nothing wrong with this logic, this approach, when one bears in mind that the invented particle is

only a theory, but where scientists go amuck is in claiming a subatomic particle real because it has leapt into their

imagination. A bit of reality testing is required. The electron first appeared on the drawing boards of scientists, but

reality testing followed theory in the development of electrical energy, so widely used in human society as to need no

explanation. All this groping about to explain the workings of the little universe that exists inside each atom is made

difficult by the nature of the study. The subject can't be seen, or measured, so the theories can't be proved. This does

not stop theorists from arguing with one another, however, as the goal is heady. If one understands how the atom

works, one could plot and achieve marvelous feats.

Humans are continuously frustrated by the limitations of their knowledge. Where the common man looks with awe at

academia and scientists working in labs because they seem to understand how it all works, in fact it is no secret that

they are all quite confused. The various departments in the average university could not sit down and discuss the

smallest scientific statement without breaking into argument. The disciplines of science openly contradict each other!

The confused student is left scratching his head, but is still expected to pay his fees promptly. Likewise, research labs

proudly announce their successes, but bury their failures. No right minded financial backer or scientist would proceed

to build something based on theory. Why? Because the theories seldom hold when experiments are run. Most scientific

discoveries are made by accident, and that's a fact. The milk spills into the vinegar by accident, and now the vinegar is no longer sour. By accident.

So, how small is small? To put it into perspective, the electron, which humans now think of as one unit but are casting

a suspicious eye toward and thinking may perhaps prove to be many types of particles, in a clump or acting

independently, is composed of some 387 discrete types of particles. This number of subatomic particles is the count

we, the Zeta, are aware of, but we suspect even we are ignorant of the true count and may be in error on some of our

assumptions. After all, we're only Zetan.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s19.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:00 AM]

ZetaTalk: Unified Theory

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Unified Theory

Note: written on Jul 15, 1996.

Einstein understood far more than he relayed to mankind. Einstein spoke to mankind within the confines of their

ability to digest at the time. Great minds, visiting the primitive, lose the audience if they speak well beyond the

capabilities to understand. His audience was in the main scientists, and they were able to barely comprehend what he

was addressing as is. Now long after his death he is deemed a genius, and correct on many matters. Should he have

drifted further afield, he would have been dismissed utterly. He withheld information, deliberately, as do all visitors to

a 3rd Density world where spiritual growth is incomplete and high tech weaponry would give the self-serving too

much of an advantage. Mankind thus got a glimpse, and a glimpse only, into a world they will not be allowed to

explore at this time.

Einstein's theory of relativity, which challenged the accepted notion that matter and energy could not transmute, was

violently resisted. In putting forth his Unified Theory, Einstein was not attempting to explain to everyone's satisfaction the factors that govern the motion of planets and sub-atomic particles. He was attempting to wrap his relativity

arguments with additional material, so that his critics would have to shut up and think. Thus, the Unified Theory is

incomplete, as it was never intended to be otherwise. What's missing? Mankind can scarcely be unaware of gravity

and can quantify this force as well as the behavior of moving objects fairly accurately, as even the playpen of a babe is

a lab in this regard. Einstein postulated that there were two other forces, equally as influential, but as with his theory of

relativity these involved factors and views new to man.

The third force, which he called vibrational intensity, was considered theoretical by Einstein's peers, but it manifests in

nature in the Bermuda Triangle and other such spots where natural density shifting occur, and was the basis of the

Philadelphia Experiment. To detail this third force beyond what Einstein provided would be to empower the likes of

those who conducted the Philadelphia Experiment, who would surely return to their tinkering, sending yet more

enlisted men to a horrible death in their lust to harness the ability to transmute to other densities. The Philadelphia

Experiment stands as a perfect example of why 3rd Density worlds are not given technology beyond their spiritual

maturity. Babes in the sandbox are not handed loaded guns, at least not by any responsible person. Thus, any press by

humans to learn more of Einstein's third force will simply not succeed no matter where this press is applied or how

cleverly it may be packaged. The answer is no.

Einstein's fourth force was what he termed pressure rebound, and this equates to what we have termed the repulsion

force. This force mystified Einstein's peers, who could not determine how to test the theory and were given no help in

this matter by Einstein. In truth, in that era, there was no way for humans to demonstrate the repulsion force, as the test requires an escape from Earth's gravity, not possible before the space age. Will Einstein's Unified Theory be completed

during the age of man? As mankind will phase out during the coming Transformation and is considered too immature

to handle such knowledge, the Unified Theory will remain for man just that - a theory. The theory as presented by

Einstein was lacking several key pieces, and without these pieces no progress is possible. Sorry. Grow up, and then

we'll talk about it.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s73.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:00 AM]

ZetaTalk: by Human Hand

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: by Human Hand

written Sep 10, 2005

Is there weather manipulation going on? [and from another] Did someone create hurricane Katrina using

HAARP? [and from another] Nikola Tesla was able to manipulate the weather in the early part of the 20th

century. He was well known to police in Greenwich Village responding to complaints from terrified

neighbors about the lightening bolts originating from the top of his building. [and from another] HAARP -

the government's High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program - is a multi-megawatt natural gas

fired power station in Alaska with more power than 20 regional FM stations operating all at once. [and

from another source] Many now believe that the Russians used high tech energy beams to steer Katrina to

New Orleans. [and from another] Katrina was an Anunnaki assault. Certain world leaders are aware that

events are all part of the alien wars, but they face a dilemma. Do they announce alien wars on the planet

or keep up the façade that these are natural disasters? As time goes on, many parts of the planet will be

impacted by alien weather incidents. [and from another] In the scalar EM extension, EM field energy can

be turned into gravitational field energy and vice versa. [and from another] Divine retribution is meted

out according to the principle of measure for measure, just as the Jews were forced out of their homes as

a result of U.S. pressure on Israel, so too are Americans being forced out of their homes. [and from

another] There has been a suspicious increase in frequency of otherwise very rare category 5 hurricanes.

Before hurricane Andrew (1992, apparently a time when scalar technology was available) there were only

two recorded category 5 hurricanes in the US. Katrina suddenly and inexplicably exploded over the Gulf

of Mexico allegedly due to the warm Gulf waters. Then, the next item of suspicion is the target: New

Orleans, shaped like a basin and beneath sea level, also conveniently a center of oil refining for the US

and located near the Gulf of Mexico oil production.

We stated a decade ago, when ZetaTalk began, that the weather was going to become extreme and detailed in what manner. In step with increasing volcanism, weather extremes emerged in the mid 1990's because the core of the Earth

was swirling and in turmoil, creating pressure on the magma. This, of course, due to the approach of Planet X. Both

volcanism and weather extremes emerged, as well as an up-tick in earthquake frequency and strength. Was this due to

the ionosphere being heated by some secret weapon? When the Earth developed a wobble due to the presence of

Planet X near the Sun, a Figure 8 discernable and measurable and well documented, this added a new weather

anomaly, as the crust is pulled under the atmosphere suddenly during the wobble, creating vertical drafts over the prevailing westerlies. Should someone desperate to deny the presence of Planet X say that all this is caused by the

Sun's effect on the atmosphere, we point to another well documented fact, the times when global shuddering is

registered on the live seismographs, discernable since early 2003 when Planet X entered the inner solar system. These are times when the Atlantic Rift either faces or is in opposition to the magnetic presence of Planet X, which wishes the

Atlantic Rift to stay in alignment with it. And another well documented fact not taken into consideration by those

wanting an alternate explanation to the presence of Planet X is the Moon's orbit, consistently too far North and then too far South during the Month, in a pattern established in early 2004.

Those wanting any explanation other than the presence of Planet X, which is not only discernable from the Earth

changes such as more extreme weather and an Earth wobble and increased volcanism and earthquakes and the

face/dark shuddering and a tilted Moon, but also visible by eye and captured by camera, will apparently grasp at anything. In primitive times, such times of unease resulted in sacrifices to the gods, as surely some human action had

caused this, brought down the wrath of the gods. These fingers are already being pointed in your supposedly modern

time, the ultra-right in the US pointing to New Orleans as a sin city, and the like. An explanation outside of the Planet

X explanation simply is not forthcoming. The cover-up, by official sources, tried Global Warming, but this ignores the

incresing volcanism and earthquakes, so is inadequate. Mustering anything they had, and spewing these alternative

explanations onto the Internet in the hopes they might catch on, the cover-up now has the secret weapon theories, and

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta240.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:01 AM]

ZetaTalk: by Human Hand

their proponents.

Lasers, ray guns, control of mysterious particle flows that are a hybrid of gravity and electromagnetic particles, secret

technology that leaves no evidence and has no parallel in human science, somehow at fault. This is scarsely a step

from sacrifices to the gods because some human action has caused a catastrophe. Perhaps throwing virgins into

volcanoes will come into fashion again. Perhaps the gods are angry and clapping their hands in the sky or in

underground caverns where they hang out amid the molten lava. How much easier it is to cling to such explanations,

than to examine the evidence. Look at the Moon, the periodic global shuddering, the Earth torque which we predicted almost a year before it emerged, which likewise is consistently confirmed by USGS charts, the Earth wobble, the

anomalies next to the Sun captured on film and observed by thousands over the past couple years, and put those facts

into the mix, and see what explanation covers them all. The presence of Planet X, solely.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta240.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:01 AM]

ZetaTalk: Ferromagnetism

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Ferromagnetism

Note: written on Apr 15, 1996.

From childhood to adulthood, magnets have fascinated man. Young children are given sets of magnets to play with,

linking them end to end. School children are shown, with iron ore dust, just how those invisible magnetic lines reach

and curl, preparatory to a lecture about the Earth's magnetic field and on to how to use the compass when lost in the

woods. The use of magnets so permeates industrialized human society that one would be hard pressed to find an aspect

not affected. Claspless doors are secured with magnets, airplanes fly on automatic based on magnetic alignment, and

recyclers separate out metal with magnets, to name but a few. Yet magnetism is not understood by man, though

theories abound. It's clear that something flows, but just what is flowing is unknown. It's clear that direction is

important, but just what is dictating this direction is unclear. It's clear that magnetism occurs naturally, especially in

certain ores such as iron, but what it is that is special about iron ore is a puzzle.

Magnetism is the palpable, measurable effect of a subatomic particle not yet delineated by man. In fact, there are

several dozen sub-atomic particles involved, out of the 387 involved in what humans assume to be simply the flow of

electrons. Where electric current can be made to flow in any direction, the path of least resistance, magnetic flow

seems to be very single minded. In fact, it is also going in the path of least resistance, as can be seen when one

understands the path and what constitutes resistance for magnetic flow. Unlike electricity, which only occasionally

flows in nature, the flowing sub- atomic particles that constitute a magnetic field are constantly flowing. This is the

natural state, to be in motion. The path of least resistance, therefore, is to go with the flow, and the flow is determined

by the biggest bully in the vicinity.

A single atom of iron, isolated, will establish the direction of flow based on the tightly orbiting electron particles, of

which there are hundreds of sub-types. These tight orbits arrange themselves in a manner not unlike the planets around

a sun, but the field, of course, is much more crowded. Given the fairly static number of these particles that will hang

around an iron ore nucleus, the orbiting swirl may have a rhythm, rather than a steady hum. Put 3 groups of 3 into a

cycle of 10 and you have whomp whomp whomp pause. Should the cycle, based on the nucleus and the electron sub-

atomic particles it attracts due to its size and composition, be 4 groups of 3 in a cycle of 12, you would have whomp

whomp whomp whomp. The steady hum of the second cycle does not lack a magnetic flow, it is just diffuse. The

irregular cycle in the first example finds the magnetic flow escaping during the pause. Being attracted again to the best

partner in the vicinity, the single iron atom, the magnetic sub-atomic particles will circle around, taking the path of

least resistance which of course is on the other side of the atom from the outward flow.

Placing a second iron atom next to the first finds the two lining up, so the flow escaping during the pause of each goes

in the same direction. This is a bit like forcing a second water flow into a flowing stream. Toss a stick into both

forceful streams and you will see that the water flows are moving in the same direction as much as possible - the path

of least resistance. In this manner the magnetic flow of the largest bully forces all else in the neighborhood to line up.

Where the iron ore atoms are caught in an amalgam and not altogether free to shift their positions within the amalgam,

the magnetic flow may physically move the amalgam, this being, again, the path of least resistance. For those who

would state that magnetism is not a thing, as it can't be weighted or measured or seen, we would point to the child's

trick whereby two magnets are held positive end to positive end. Let go and they move so that they are aligned positive

end to negative end. What made these magnets move, if not a thing?

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s66.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:01 AM]

ZetaTalk: Water Cradle

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Water Cradle

Note: written on Jul 15, 1995.

On almost all worlds, life evolves in a liquid. This is reasonable as the liquid provides mobility, and increases greatly

the chances that any complex molecule will encounter another. If one examines the physical structure of intelligent

species, one finds rudimentary gills, fins, egg sacs, webbing, if not the frank requirement of a liquid for the home.

Most telling is the development of the fetus, where the evolutionary history repeats itself. We, the Zetas, do not have

records we can tap regarding these early beginnings on your planet. Planets, especially water planets, are seeded with

simple DNA components and left alone. Things work out or they don't, and these planets are not checked that

frequently. If life did not start, re-seeding, perhaps of a different nature, is done. To trace your beginnings, we must do

as your scientists have, and look at the stages the fetus goes through. The forebrain develops last, and arms and legs

also come late. It takes a long time for the tail to disappear, and gills are unmistakably evident in the early days. You

were first a fish.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s23.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:02 AM]

ZetaTalk: Sentience

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Sentience

Note: written on May 15, 1996.

Man values his intelligence, forethought, empathy, and consciousness, as these place him above the other animals on

the Earth, or so he thinks. Man is a sentient being, but the low life of the Earth have these qualities in some measure

too, as they are concomitant with what the basic building blocks of life throughout the Universe produce. From simple

one celled creatures to the complexity of a hominoid, life interacts with its surroundings in the same manner. Life that

survives at all is self protective, and thus has self awareness of sorts. If it must do more than simply react to survive,

must be proactive, then a form of forethought has occurred. Animals with the same genetic structure can scarcely help

but experience empathy with each other when cries of distress are heard or the tensed posture of defense is assumed.

Early empathy is simply shared neuron patterns and shared experiences. Thus, depending on the chemical components

of the world and the path evolution takes on that world, the sentient creatures that result may take any form, and the

list would be infinite. Sentience is not exclusive to man, or to mammals, or to the Earth - it is concomitant with life

itself throughout the Universe.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s69.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:02 AM]

ZetaTalk: Early Man

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Early Man

Note: written on Jul 15, 1995.

Man has a fascination with his early forms for good reason. Early Man was father to the child, and the child wishes to

know whereof he sprang. Early Man's appearance changed as his developmental stages changed - ranging as one

would expect from ape-like to man-like. Hypothesis on his appearance almost always leans in the direction of man-like

traits, as humans feel uncomfortable to some degree when contemplating their origins. Monkeys have bright coloration

on their faces and behinds, and so did early White Man. Sharp prominent teeth were a characteristic of Gypsy Man,

whose grimacing face was more tooth than otherwise. African Black Man was covered with hair, in his early stages,

and though black men of today are without beards in the main, beards were present in the prototype. And the

descendants of China Man would be surprised to learn he had a tail for quite some time.

Man, in each of the 6 races, was developed in stages, and between these development stages was allowed a period of

time for things to settle down and for the genetically engineered product to be road tested. Would it break down?

Frequently this happened, resulting in intervention, fine tuning the product to correct whatever was deemed to be the

problem. Archeologists discover bones, such as those of Neanderthal Man, and wonder what became of him. Did he

die out? Did he evolve? It seems he rather abruptly disappeared, and such a strapping fellow, he was!

Neanderthal Man was taken in hand to correct a problem. All of him? Yes. This was affected by making him sterile, a

simple snip to the male, where he roamed free, and genetically engineering those taken into the lab. So there be no

misinterpretation, let us explain that the lab did not consist of cages, but in this instance was an island, and a paradise

at that. The lab was a controlled environment, but with no more controls than necessary. So what were Neanderthal's

problems, and what did he become? Neanderthal, big brute that he was, had a digestive problem. It is often assumed

that he died out because he was stupid, or confrontational, but he was none of these and underwent change only

because he had tummy troubles. He was not living his full life, and some died young, due to inability to digest the

foods available, to take advantage of the fauna and flora that were perforce his menu. Coming out of his genetic

correction, and returned to his environs, he looked different - a bit like Cro Magnon Man.

The bones of Homo Erectus simply mark the evolution of more than one race at a particular stage. Where did he go?

Into the labs to become the next stage. You can equate the puzzle archeologists are trying to put together with litter

along the highway. Here there are Coke bottles, there plastic wrappers, and at yet another stretch, no litter at all. If one

did not understand that litter was influenced by recycling efforts and laws, the price paid for aluminum and glass, and

the dedication of local groups or commandeered prisoners set out to pick the roadside clear, the patterns would make

no sense. The missing link in the evolution of man is not a particular pile of bones as yet undiscovered, it is the teams

of genetic engineers who periodically descended on Earth to check on their handiwork, and left when mankind had

made another leap.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s24.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:03 AM]

ZetaTalk: DNA Building Blocks

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: DNA Building Blocks

Note: written on Jul 15, 1995.

Where carbon and silicon serve as the base upon which life is built, throughout the Universe that we, the Zetas, are

cognizant of, there are other variants. Many elements you, on Earth, consider to be trace elements are common on other

worlds. An example is the element lithium, which is so remarkably soothing to those humans diagnosed as bipolar. It

is no accident that these individuals are found to have a higher incidence of creativity, energy, and intelligence. It was

for those qualities that a genetic contribution was made from worlds where lithium happened to be a common element.

Doctors are not curing a disease by medicating with lithium, they are correcting an imbalance.

On some worlds iron is a trace element, and if carbon based, the blood does not rely on iron in the manner that

creatures on your Earth do. There, they do not develop iron deficiency anemia, but develop a similar reaction to a lack

of silicon, the most common substitute for iron in this matter. Of course, the manner in which blood chemistry works

in these instances has more differences than parallels. Humans are sometimes shocked to learn that aliens have green

or clear blood, and correctly assume that the blood chemistry is radically different. One reason that we, the Zetas, were

chosen to create a hybrid race with humans was our relative compatibility in this area. Our home planets had iron in

abundance. Should one doubt that elements vary in their proportion throughout the Universe, one has but to look to

meteors, where nickel is sought. Beyond nickel, look to what variance is found between the substances in meteors and

your average hunk of Earth, or for that matter, what variances are found when comparing one meteor against another.

Perhaps, to humans, the most surprising difference would be that oxygen is not the breath of life to all, as it is on Earth

and to those life forms commonly visiting Earth. Why else would some of your ancient visitors have worn helmets?

On their worlds, a helium component is key, and on the surface of your Earth they are drowning for lack of this as

surely as you drown when under water, away from free oxygen in the proportion you require it. We have mentioned

that some worlds would be considered radioactive by you, yet life lives there. How has their life adapted to the

bombardment that disrupts your processes. Their chemistry, in fact, requires this bombardment, in the same manner

that you require sunlight in order to manufacture vitamin D, without which your bones go soft. Life evolved on those

planets while this situation existed, and DNA that learned to utilize the environment, rather than sicken from it, was

the survivor that propagated. Just so many variations developed, on many worlds, and their differences are greater than

their similarities.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s25.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:04 AM]

ZetaTalk: Biorhythms

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Biorhythms

Note: written on Aug 15, 1995.

Researchers have correctly identified rhythms in humans that ebb and flow, with great regularity, commonly known as

biorhythms. These have been divided into categories, which are not all that precise, in our opinion, nor do they deal

with any but a minority of the biorhythms actually operand. Do biorhythms start from the moment of birth, as

claimed? Some do, as the moment of birth is traumatic and griping, no matter how easy the delivery. The babe must

breath, feels the cool air, is handled - all for the first time. A shock. Other biorhythms set off from the moment of

conception, and yet others when the nervous system reaches a point in its development capable of sustained activity,

such as movement, the flutter that expectant mothers refer to as feeling life.

What are biorhythms and why do they persist with such regularity? So much in life is controlled by biological

switches, the urge to eat switched on by an empty stomach, or to drink by a blood chemistry ration, or to defecate by a

full colon. And is not menstruation cyclical, the urge to sleep, the sex drive? Biorhythms, however, are not influenced

by factors outside of themselves. They hear only their own rhythm, and listen only to the note they sing. Unlike brain

waves, they are not a choir. They are all soloists. A biorhythm is the expression of the rising and falling of chemical

levels in the blood, cerebrospinal fluid, lymph, intramuscular tissues, kidneys, and various glands. These chemical

levels are regulated, much like a self activating sump pump, by high and low points. When the chemical level drops to

the low point, the body switches into production mode on this particular chemical, and when the chemical level rises to

the high point, the body switches production off again.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s32.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:05 AM]

ZetaTalk: Aging Process

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Aging Process

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

Aging is a natural process that happens to all incarnated entities, although the rate and effect may differ. Let us be

specific. Complex organisms fight two battles. One is to gain in size and complexity soon enough to reproduce

effectively, and the second is to stave off the aging process while this is going on. What is the aging process? Any

machine wears down, the edges of the parts getting rough until they fail to operate as expected, connections breaking,

refurbishments failing to appear when needed, and foundations crumbling under weight over time. Happens

everywhere, all the time. Happens to the intelligent, conscious, bodies incarnated with indestructible souls. But there

are pros and cons, and there are differences in the aging process between the densities and between intelligent species

on other worlds. Aging is a factor of other matters.

In higher densities aging takes place more slowly, as the physical body has less weight than the spiritual body. This is

to say that the faults in the physical body are amended by the spiritual, which wishes to remain in the body for as long

as possible. The spirit steps in and acts as a bridge at the points where the physical body is failing, taking up some of

its time and energy to do so, we might add. On some worlds aging takes place less drastically, as the shape of the

physical body is such that simplicity prevails. Take the simple VW bug, which runs forever because it has few parts

simply structured. Same principle.

For those wishing to defer the aging process as long as possible, the following advice is given. Think of all parts of the

body as important, not just those that complain loudly. The kidneys and liver operate quietly, and get nowhere near as

much attention as the clogging arteries or laboring lungs, which alert their host by pained legs and chest or short

breath. Yet these organs cause quiet destruction, not yet known to your physicians. Drink lots of clear water, or fluid

filled meals, as the primitive animals that were your precursors ran a continuous race, sweated much, and required lots

of fluids. Do not overburden your livers with rich meals, which some of your number deliver daily. Rich meals were a

rarity among the primitive animals which were your precursors, a feast they had only when a large animal was downed

and competition for the kill scarce. The liver needs to spring back, but the treatment frequently given by civilized man

is like the continuous punching that referees in the boxing ring don't allow. Time out!

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s16.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:05 AM]

ZetaTalk: Auto-Immune Diseases

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Auto-Immune Diseases

Note: written on Oct 15, 1995.

Auto-immune diseases are some of the most distressing, for both the patient and doctor, as the curse is tied to a

physical response often considered the cure - the immune response. In an attempt to do something, human physicians

do their best by attempting to dampen or counteract the immune system, all of which enters a new set of problems into

the picture. A no-win situation. The sufferer and those who care watch in agony as the body does its best to destroy

itself. The enemy is within, and in more than one way, as the psychological makeup of the afflicted and the caretakers

is a significant part of the problem. In our observation we have found that humans with auto-immune responses are

dealing, simultaneously, with a situation in which they are loved to death and at the same time not loved at all. A trap

from which they are loath to leave and their disease often disables them to where they cannot leave and thus a death

march ensues.

The immune system is sensitive to the psychological state, a fact which human physicians are acutely aware of. Cancer

patients are often choosing to die by maintaining the depressive state that preceded the disease. A quick, if somewhat

gruesome, escape, and one which the patient can use to punish those they are angry at - the family who must watch the

process. In auto-immune diseases, as in allergies, the problem is the reverse - an overactive or rather hyper-sensitive

immune response. The body is like a bow strung too tight, which twangs at every touch. This is not the result of

depression, a wish to die, but a heightened wish to survive, to live. The body perceives danger, due to the

psychological situation, and mobilizes. Auto-immune diseases frequently remit and assault, in waves those outside of

the situation struggle to interpret. At times the disease disappears entirely, just goes away. If the patterns are analyzed

from a psychological perspective, looking past the loving smiles and tender pats, one will see whereof we speak.

The patient is often in the iron grip of someone who has restricted their life into nothingness, a dull and boring void

without purpose or true emotion. Free the afflicted into the normal interaction that life presents, without repercussion

for their participation, and watch what happens!

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s40.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:06 AM]

ZetaTalk: Spontaneous Human Combustion

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Spontaneous Human Combustion

Note: written on May 15, 1996.

Humans tend to think of fire as occurring at a high temperature, as when the process is going full bore this is indeed

the case. But what of the moment when combustion is first starting, when sunlight is warming chemicals or a match is

being dragged across a surface? High temperatures are not required to start the combustion process, which is but a

chemical process, though high temperatures most often result. Many chemical reactions give out heat, a byproduct in

excess during the molecular rearrangement. Many combustion processes also occur in a finite or limited manner, and

may go unnoticed. A limited combustion process is what keeps the human body at 98.6 degrees, for instance - a slow

burn.

Oxygen is present in the blood due to the bellowing action of the lungs, and fats or sugars present from stores in the

liver or as a result of digestion. The components for a fire hotter than 98.6 are therefore present, but are held in check only by the limited supply of oxygen. Damp a fire and its pace becomes controlled. Blow on a fire and it flares. The

pace of a fire is determined by the availability of its ingredients, and for the slow burn that takes place in the human

body, oxygen is one of those ingredients. What would occur, then, if a substitute for oxygen were to become available,

along with a catalyst to start the process. Matches start a fire because the heat produced by friction acts as a catalyst

for the chemical mix on the head of the match. Where heat is not required to start the chemical process known as

combustion, oxygen or a similar ingredient is required to keep it going.

That said, what causes spontaneous human combustion, a rare but frightening occurrence.

Beyond what is normally present in the human body - oxygen in limited amounts and fuels - those who spontaneously

ignite have inadvertently created their own cremation by fretting and eating, a combination that often occurs. If life

feels out of control, then eat. Fat laden foods comfort the most, as comfort from banking against the cold of a long

winter or lean times is built into the human animal. The more worry, the more chomping occurs, and under normal

circumstances this simply results in obesity. However, worry causes the liver to flood the blood stream with a fine oil,

readily lit, in case the body may need to take flight or fight. In some humans a rare genetic condition exists that allows

the combustion of this fine oil to continue, unabated, when in combination with a type of adrenaline, the catalyst. The

need for oxygen is bypassed, as a self-feeding chemical reaction starts where a byproduct of the catalyst- induced

combustion incites combustion in neighboring areas, and the matter goes out of control.

These humans, ostensibly fat and even jolly, are invariably found alone in their cremated state. This was a source of

their self induced anxiety, as they chose to live alone, yet feared being alone, being their own worst enemy on all

fronts. Does the human suffer? They feel no pain, as they become unconscious early in the process. A warm feeling,

and then all goes black, as the brain is the first to receive blood from the pumping heart and brain cells are delicate.

The unconscious and rapidly dying body, heart and breathing stopped, progresses to an intense chemical reaction,

without oxygen, that is fast, hot, and very limited. The surroundings rarely burn unless highly flammable, as it is over

too quickly to heat the air or raise the temperature of flame resistant furniture to the level where combustion runs

unabated. Before the advent of flame resistant furnishings, spontaneous human combustion was not recognized for

what it is. A spark from the fireplace or perhaps murder were suspected, but all clues were destroyed in the fire.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s67.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:06 AM]

ZetaTalk: Dinosaur Extinction

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Dinosaur Extinction

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

Habitable planets are in the minority, as your scientists well know. Habitable planets that can sustain life long enough

for intelligent species to evolve are in an even slimmer minority. The reasons for this reduction is the number of

catastrophes that can befall evolving life, setting the clock all the way back. Catastrophes are many, and involve more

than cataclysms.

In the main, evolving life falls because of the tiniest enemy, microorganisms which are likewise constantly evolving.

Microorganisms have more flexibility than larger animals and greater mobility than plants. They can change hosts if

their original host is not available. They have fewer factors to deal with. Where a large animal must only breath air or

water but most often not both, and locate and eat non-poisonous food in sufficient quantity to sustain its bulk, and find

a mate and then carry and rear the young - microorganisms have an easier time of it all around. They can survive in

water or air, most often, eat most anything at hand, divide to produce young and all in a day. What we are telling you

is that the dinosaurs did not die because their food source failed to grow due to the gloom from dust thrown up from a

meteor impact, nor did small mammals chew up their eggs faster than they could hatch. They died because they were

genetically related, and were thus similarly susceptible to the same microorganisms. The killer is no longer

recognizable, having mutated long, long ago into another path altogether.

It would be sheer speculation as to what the intelligent species on Earth would have been, had this not occurred.

However, most habitable planets do indeed evolve reptilian species, not mammalian, as the dominant species. This is

К описанию Далее >

Канал с обзорами, анонсами новинок и книжными подборками

Книжный Вестник

Бот для удобного поиска книг (если не нашлось на сайте)

Поиск книг

Свежие любовные романы в удобных форматах

Любовные романы

О психологии, саморазвитии и личностном росте

Саморазвитие

Детективы и триллеры, все новинки

Детективы

Фантастика и фэнтези, все новинки

Фантастика

Отборные классические книги

Классика

Библиотека с любовными романами, которая наверняка придётся по вкусу женской части аудитории

Любовные романы

Библиотека с фантастикой и фэнтези, а также смежных жанров

Фантастика

Самые популярные книги в формате фб2

Топ фб2 книги