pulling from can create a double void.
Human scientists already know that the core of the Earth moves faster than the crust, rotates faster. The core pulls with the Sun, dragging the magma along with it, the crust of the Earth dragged along with the magma, and the atmosphere and oceans of the
Earth dragged along with the crust. Sudden and violent wind storms from the South, accompanying the Polar Wobble, indicate the Earth jerked to the South at that point, the crust moving under the atmosphere and thus the winds, the magma pulling the crust
under that point and thus at that point a magma void. Thus, the Mediterranean region, which has experienced these sudden wind storms from the South, has a predictable magma void.
Since the crust suddenly moved south, it has a depressing effect on the magma it is pulled over. Magma under the crust in the polar regions is moving slowly, sluggish, and at the Equator moving and swirling more rapidly. If the crust is suddenly pulled
South during the wobble, it pulls along with it any magma caught in its rough edges. This sluggish magma flow, suddenly pulled
atop more rapidly moving magma, creates a crowding relieved by a circular motion from the sluggish magma near the crust
toward the faster moving magma near the interior. This difference is more dramatic toward the Equator, thus this flow to relieve
the crowding moves North to South, as noted in this Mediterranean fountain, and from crust to interior, in a counterclockwise
motion.That this fountain motion developed only recently indicates an increased wobble, all of which will translate into volcanic and atmospheric changes.
Volcanic activity, increased eruptions in already active volcanoes, have been recently noted in the Kamchatka Peninsula. We have
mentioned the sudden wind storms in Japan as being linked to anticipated Magma Slams against the spine of the Andes, and thus Japan is an area where a magma void could be anticipated. If these magma voids are causing vertical magma flows that clash with the normal horizontal magma flows, increased activity, would this not roil the magma up into volcanic outlets more aggressively?
Spin on the surface of the Earth reflects what is occurring in the core of the Earth. Spin moves in different directions when it is above or below the equator. One of the outer edges, the one on the pole side, is lined up over core parts that are
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta203.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:06 AM]
ZetaTalk: Magma Voids
moving slower than the other outer edge, the one on the equator side.
ZetaTalk: Spin, written Jan 15, 1997
The Earth's crust is in an equilibrium with the normal magma surges driving the rotation. Now things have changed, and
this change will accelerate. Europe has experienced those, winds from the South, and on the other side of the globe from
there a double whammy point, Tasmania. The US has experienced these vertical sudden windstorms, and on the other side
of the globe lies the African Rift. Japan has been assaulted by sudden winds from the South in Tokyo, and on the other side
of the globe lies the spine of the Andes in South America.
ZetaTalk: Magma Slam, written Dec 28, 2004
Where the Earth is pulled, the atmosphere is not, and lingers where it was while the crust moves beneath it. Accounts of
sudden wind storms, unexpected and
out of season, are occurring.
ZetaTalk: Weather Wobbles, written Dec 6, 2004
Signs of the Times #1302
Edgar Cayceś prediction about Earth change activity in the South Seas also goes on to state that activity would
coincide with activity at Mt. Etna. Within three months of these events you could expect the pole shift. ... Edgar Cayce
most certainly did predict this Tsunami. He also said that a major sign to watch for, following this, was Mt Etna in
Italy becoming active the same time as a volcano in the Caribbean. Yesterday 3 volcanoes in that area also became
active. ... Question: How soon will the changes in the earthś activity begin to be apparent? Cayce: When there is the
first breaking up of some conditions in the South Pacific and the sinking or rising in the Mediterranean and the Etna
area then we would say they have begun. [and from another source] Gondolas stuck as Venice waters recede [Jan
13] ‘Gondolas are running aground and hotel docks hang in midair as Italyś lagoon city Venice, more commonly
awash at high tide, dries out.’ [and from another source] This is not normal at all. This is the flood season in Venice
and there is NO record of the canals ever going empty like this. http://www.hotelcipriani.com/ ‘Acqua alta (High tides): Generally Venice only has Acqua Alta in Autumn and Winter when some streets and squares flood. The city is
well prepared with pedestrian routes equipped with special footbridges to avoid the high water and to reach the main
parts of Venice.’ [and from another source] News on TV in Spain today saying the water level is down 65 centimetres
in Venice. About 10 days ago there was also news on the weather report of one of the big channels here explaining to
people why the level of the Mediterranean Sea on the shores of Barcelona was down 20 centimetres - they said it was
due to an unusually high pressure area over the Iberian Peninsula and much of the rest of Europe. Seemed very odd.
[Note: interesting correlation between Cayce predictions and present day occurrences, the tsunami in Indian Ocean,
volcanic eruptions of late, and now a heaving floor in the Mediterranean.]
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta203.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:06 AM]
ZetaTalk: Storm Clash
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Storm Clash
written Feb 18, 2005
The twin cyclones in the South Pacific correspond with the recently observed change in surface spin!
We have defined Weather Wobbles as atypical wind storms resulting from sudden movement of the crust under the
atmosphere during the Polar Wobble, but ocean currents are also affected, rushing first one way and then the next.
Why would these not form, in the oceans, as a result of increasing wobble, especially as warm and cold air will mix
during this sloshing, adding to the formation of tornadoes in the water, the whirlpool effect. What effect will an
increased wobble, a more violent wobble, have on the major storms that form over the oceans of the world? Air
currents follow the temperature changes in the ocean waters, heating and rising, or cooling and suddenly plunging, the
normal storm formation finding a new additive to the mix, one the forecasters had not taken into account. It is of
record that the Hurricane season in 2004 had more storms of higher violence than every before. It is of record that the
typhoon season in Asia had almost double the number, breaking all previous records. The cyclone season for 2005 in
the South Seas now appears to be following suit. But beyond stronger and more frequent storms, and more whirlpool
formation, there will be an as yet unanticipated effect, storm clash.
The circular pattern of major storms on both hemispheres is due to the greater distance traveled at the Equator
compared to the poles, the crust of the Earth pulling under the water at a faster pace at the Equator, thus creating a
void behind water pulled toward the East, which is filled by water dropping into it from the direction of the poles, thus
starting a clockwise rotation in the water in the Northern Hemisphere, and a counterclockwise rotation in the water in the Southern Hemisphere. This fact can even be noted in water in micro-environments such as toilets or bathtubs,
where the swirl of the descending water most often takes this direction. The fact that magma under the surface is also
moving in these directions adds to this tug. During a violent wobble the Earth lurches quickly, as has been noted at
times by startled observers seeing the Moon or constellations move too quickly or the Sun hovering too long at certain
times of day. Those carefully observing and recording such things are astonished, sensing they are actually observing
the wobble, no longer theoretical but palpable. If water in a toilet or bathtub forms predictable little whirlpools as it
goes down the drain, then water in the oceans, finding that part near or far from the Equator suddenly changed, or the
magma motion suddenly changed, will have its dynamics changed. Where are the voids formed? What portion of the
ocean is now moving faster, to create a void? And what effect will this have on an already formed storm, building in
fury as it marches across the water toward land?
Swirling in the oceans and the air will only increase, not only becoming more violent and following each other in short
order, but also will begin slamming into each other, creating weather conditions utterly unpredictable and horrific in
their consequences. Forecasters will be dismayed. Water on the move, finding a blockage before it, mounts high, on
land termed a tidal bore but in the ocean creating gigantic waves when the force of water moving in one direction
meets another. These waves do not simply stand in place, they move in all directions, choppy, and huge. The storm
surge anticipated during major storms is predictable, coming from one direction, as is the wind, but what would be the
effect of surges and wind coming from different directions, simultaneously, during such storms. This battering will tear
buildings to pieces, send missiles from all directions to smash into each other, and the crush of water from more than
one direction crushing boats and barriers unlike the force of water on the move in a single direction. Those living
under the path of these storms will be driven to their knees, and no explanation for why this has afflicted the Earth that fits, other than the Earth wobble.
Signs of the Times #1340
Twin cyclones batter the South Pacific, could combine into 'Perfect Storm' [Feb 16] 'Twin cyclones
battered three south Pacific nations and weather experts warned they could combine into one giant,
destructive storm center that would create havoc in the region. Olaf slowed down in the hours
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta204.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:07 AM]
ZetaTalk: Storm Clash
before it closed in on the main Samoan island of Savai'i and was a strong Category 4 cyclone, out of
a maximum of 5, producing sustained winds over 250 kilometers (155 miles) per hour and 15 meter
(50-foot) waves. Nancy had weakened from a category 4 to a category 2 cyclone as it passed
through the Cook Islands, probably due to interaction with more powerful Olaf to the NW. The
Cooks were still recovering from significant damage caused by a category 4 cyclone, Meena, which
struck just 10 days ago.’
Signs of the Times #1333
GPS systems are being updated nightly. [Feb 1] http://www.godlikeproductions.com/ GPS was
updated 20 minutes after the quake. I work for the USN. Believe this, we are not done rolling either,
we are updating everyday between 2200 and 0100 nightly, check your GPS at this time they will not
be correct. [and from another source] Funny my GPS did act up last night, It was late but don´t
know what time it was, I´d have to say around midnight does that fit the time frame given? Don´t
know military time table. [and from another source] Mine acted funny the other night, couldn´t get it
to work for a good half hour, then it just came back on and worked. Is something going on? [and
from another source] Yes, what ís goining onís called recalebration. [Note: Earth wobble forcing
recalibration nightly.]
Signs of the Times #1324
Heaviest Snowfall Ever Hits Moscow [Jan 31] http://www.themoscowtimes.com/ ‘ powerful
snowstorm that raged in Moscow on Friday was the heaviest day's snowfall since weather records
began. Winter's return came with a vengeance after some of the mildest January temperatures on
record, which recalled weather more like that experienced in April. Thursday was also the coldest
day this winter, with the air temperature plunging to minus 17.6 degrees Celsius -- 2.4 degrees
colder than the average for this time of year. [and from another source] A summer day of dust,
thunder and freezing rain [Feb 3] ‘Freak weather brought a dust storm to Brisbane, heavy rain and
hail to Sydney, and gave Melbourne its coldest February day on record yesterday. Lashing rain
caused flight delays at Sydney airport after an electrical storm ripped through the city, bringing
down power lines and trees and tearing roofs off buildings in the inner-west suburb of Gladesville.
Hailstones the size of golf balls were reported in Sydney and the Blue Mountains, and wind gusts of
50 knots were recorded at Richmond in the west.’ [and from another source] Today - in Feburary -
our hottest month, it is snowing on the Brindabella ranges around Canberra. Weŕe lucky if it snows
on them in the middle of winter, yet alone the middle of summer. I don´t think that has ever
happened before.
Signs of the Times #1321
During the last week of January, observers all over the world noted a visually obvious wobble in the
Earth. [and from another source] El Paso, Jan 22-23 Six hours and a 45 degree shift in the Moon.
Apparently, the wobble is taking place from 22:00 to 24:00. [and from another source] Australia,
Jan 23: It looks as if the earths rotation stalled for a while on Sunday evening whilst Alt continued
to decrease. Did it tip at this point whilst being held in position? [and from another source]
Mississippi, Jan 25: The moon Friday and Saturday night stood still directly overhead for an hour.
Last night (Sunday) it slowed but kept moving. [and from another source] Arkansas, Jan 25-26: On
Jan 24, 2005, first light was around 5:30 AM and on Jan 26, 2005 first light was around 6:30 AM. I
would say the wobble is getting worse. [and from another source] Australia, Jan 27: This morning
Sigma Octantis appeared ten degrees left of a terrestrial target suggesting Earthś South Pole axis
was moved to the right away from the rising Sun. [and from another source] New York, Jan 27: I
was staring at the night sky straight at the moon. I could swear that I saw the moon quickly shift to
the left and back to its original position. My heart skipped a beat. [and from another source] Italy,
Jan 23: I have scientific evidence of the tilt and wobble of the Earth's axis. I cut a slice of one spot
in the images of Big Bear each hour. I put them in the exact position and we can see that the line
from a spot and next is not linear .As the scope has a linear movement this line is the wobble of the
axis. In the other side I take the same spot in different day from SOHO and an Earth observer. We
can see that the angle is different by 6 degree. SOHO is correct. [Note: SOHO is not the Earth, and
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta204.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:07 AM]
ZetaTalk: Storm Clash
is not wobbling! Earth is wobbling.]
Signs of the Times #1315
Coast Guard sends help to stalled
'Semester at Sea' ship [Jan 26]
‘Coast Guard rescuers are rushing to
a Semester at Sea research ship with
990 people on board that lost power
in roiling seas Wednesday afternoon
in the North Pacific south of the
Aleutians. A 50-foot wave smashed
through the bridge windows of the 591-foot MV Explorer around 2:30 p.m., pouring saltwater over
electrical components on board and disabling all four of its engines. The Explorer, which was en
route from Vancouver, B.C., to Japan, contacted the Coast Guard about five minutes after the wave
toppled the ship. Semester at Sea is a university program sponsored by the University of Pittsburgh.
It takes approximately 600 students from colleges and universities from across the United States and
abroad, around the world for a semester.’
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta204.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:07 AM]
ZetaTalk: Bigger and Closer
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Bigger and Closer
written Feb 4, 2005
Can Zetas provide answer as to what this is? See the image at 2005/02/02 15:18. Exposure time was 19.1
seconds according to NASA.
Debris from Planet X has been increasingly entering Earth’s atmosphere in the form of meteors or fireballs, once rare
but now reported almost weekly in the news, when they are given media attention at all. Exploding with a bang,
turning the night sky bright, rattling windows, thudding to Earth next to startled humans. Was this the usual rate just a
few years ago? For every fireball not captured by Earth’s atmosphere, there are dozens outside her atmosphere,
whizzing about, one of the reasons we have warned that Satellites will not function well in the months leading into the pole shift, and that the Space Station and those riding her are doomed. It is only a matter of time, for man’s
technology, aloft. The massive tail of Planet X, being composed primarily of magnetized iron oxide dust, is hosed
away from the N. Pole of Planet X, and thus up until now has been pointing toward the Sun, not Earth, as Planet X has
been struggling to rise above the Ecliptic and thus must align along the magnetic Flow Lines in the Sun’s southern hemisphere. These flow lines require the N. Pole of Planet X to be pointed toward the Sun, the S. Pole slung outward.
But what happens when that N. pole slings outward, during the
270° Roll that Planet X will make as it turns in place and then
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta200.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:08 AM]
ZetaTalk: Bigger and Closer
stands upright, side-by-side with the Sun in a position strong
enough to halt the Earth’s rotation in the days before the pole shift.
As the N. pole begins to sling toward the Earth, it hoses the
massive tail and the debris in that tail toward Earth. If fireballs
have been an occasional entertainment, they will soon become a daily affair almost everywhere, and simultaneously no
longer in the news as during a cover-up, such bad news is suppressed. While the SOHO still functions, these fireballs
at times make a graceful pass past the camera, moving in waves. We have, in the early days of ZetaTalk, described
why a Wave Action exists for sub-atomic particles on the move. They are on the move, and while on the move are in a dance with each other as they are in perpetual motion, either moving toward each other due to their desire to clump, or
moving away from each other to equalize crowding. This action, the wave action, and the reasons for it, are not
restricted to sub-atomic particles. The moons of Planet X likewise Dance with each other in what we have described as
Moon Swirls. The same mechanism applies, for minor debris dancing within the fringes of the massive tail of Planet X.
Did this meteor leave a twisting path? Evidently. Meteor trains that twist noticeably are rare - and even
more rarely photographed - but have been noted before. The underlying reason for unusual meteor trains
is that many meteors are markedly non-spherical in shape and non-uniform in composition. Meteors,
usually sand sized grains that originate in comets, will disintegrate as they enter the Earthś atmosphere.
Non-uniform meteors may evaporate more on one side than another. This may cause a rotating meteor to
wobble slightly in its path, and also to spray fast moving debris in a nearly spiral path. The fast moving
meteor debris ionizes molecules in the Earthś atmosphere that subsequently glow when they reacquire
electrons. Surely no meteor is perfectly uniform and spherical, so that a slight swagger that is below
perceptibility is likely typical.
NASA Explanation
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta200.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:08 AM]
ZetaTalk: Beneath the Dust
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Beneath the Dust
written Feb 4, 2005
How do the inhabitants of the Planet X deal with the heat from the Sun, considering how close it comes to
it and how long it stays between the Earth and the Sun? Would not the temperature be to great too allow
the continuation of life on that planet?
We have mentioned the degree to which Planet X is shrouded by a close hugging dust cloud, such that is only dimly visible from Earth as it stands between the Earth and Sun, reflecting most of the sunlight that strikes it directly back toward the Sun. From the Earth, this planet, only about 4 times the size of Venus in man’s view at its current distance,
appears to be a dull gray fuzz ball, a slight shadow in the Sun’s glare, and thus visible to man only under certain
circumstances such as the backlit view from SWAN. The dust cloud is charged and thus like tiny particles held suspended in the air by static electricity, it perpetually cloaks Planet X, not escaping nor drifting down through the
atmosphere into the great seas of that large water planet. We have mentioned that the inhabitants of Planet X, giant
hominoids who would loom at least a full head taller than man’s basketball teams and are stocky and well muscled,
deal with anxiety during the passage, as they not only zoom rapidly toward the Sun before the brakes are put on by the
gravity Repulsion Force but also spend an uncomfortable amount of time close to the heat of the Sun. Why would their world not fry, and sizzle, like Mercury and Venus?
Is there not a temperature difference between cloudy vs sunny days? Cloud cover on Earth, here just a matter of some
skimpy water vapor, makes a difference. In discussing the outcome of a potential nuclear war, the concept of a nuclear
winter emerged, where the dust from the explosions would shroud the Earth for decades, killing all life on Earth from
lack of sunlight and the resultant cold. And what about the hypothesis of why the dinosaurs became extinct, a
hypothesis we disagree with but nevertheless man’s current favorite, that a large meteor striking Earth and the resultant volcanic dust reducing the vegetation these massive herbivores required? The concept of dust preventing sunlight, and
to some extent the heat from a sun, from reaching a planet is not foreign to man. This dust cloud likewise prevents the
heat and light from Planet X, which as a smoldering brown dwarf it generates, from escaping when it is out in cold
space afar from the Sun. Indeed, there is a temperature rise during its passage of the Sun, which takes some centuries
to dissipate until its normal equilibrium is re-established. But as this planet has much less land surface, and deeper
oceans, it has a natural heat sink in its oceans. The hominoids there do not see the stars, as do Earthlings. To see where
their planet is heading, or where it currently is located, they must send aloft probes, and these well aloft to escape the
fog of dust that only gradually dissipates as distance from this giant magnet planet is attained.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta201.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:08 AM]
ZetaTalk: Simulating the Seasons
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Simulating the Seasons
written May 26, 2006
The Big Dipper appears appropriate for May 25, 2006 at midnight. The only way to get the Big Dipper to
appear as it did during the Oct 15 position, would be to assume a 5:00 pm time, then it lines up exactly as it did
on midnight May 25. I also noted that the Sunset was in the extreme NW a couple days ago, estimated 20° too far
to the North, and the message boards have been alive with similar observations for Sunrise, up to 30° too far
North. We're supposed to be pushed back into the Fall position, in our orbit, a complexity of factors at play.
Photos from Japan also show the Sun not moving steadily across the skyarc during the day, but faster at certain
points. Then there's the issue of the Earth's magnetic field moving about, recently reported to be pushed further
to the West from where it was days ago. This is such a confusing picture. What's going on? [and from another]
Usually in May the Sun goes 15° degrees per hour. I photographed the Sun shadow during the day, and this is
no longer the case. The Sun is at its zenith at 11:53 am here in Japan at Nara. I started the photo sessions at
9:53 am. From 10-11 it moved 30°, from 11-12 it moved 45°, from 12-1 it moved 50°, from 1-2 it moved 20°,
from 2-3 only 10°, from 3-4:30 only 8°. Please ask the Zetas what this means!
Beyond the issue of why the constellations appeared normal to Nancy for May 25, 2006, when she assumed the Earth to be
somewhere in the Fall position, there is also the issue of the Sun rising and setting too far to the North by many degrees, an
estimated 20-30 degrees, as noted by Nancy and a number of other individuals posting on message boards and sending her
frantic email. Nancy is trying to correlate these facts with our statements on the Earth orbit and tilt.
1. We have stated that Earth will be pushed back in her orbit to the point of August, prior to passage, and is held in the cup. The mobility for Earth while in the cup is up and down and side to side, but not for a very large distance.
2. We mentioned earlier that pushing the globe down below the Ecliptic is another way of maintaining the appearance of
normalcy, as a lower posture vs a vs the Sun floods the Northern Hemisphere with sunlight, and puts the Southern
Hemisphere into darker days for their Winter. Likewise bobbing the Earth up vs a vs the Sun, in the Ecliptic, allows
the reverse.
3. We have explained that the constellations are overhead all the time, just not visible because of light pollution. In a globe out of position, constellations overhead in the dome appear only slightly out of position, but constellations on the
horizon will switch, E/W, so this horizon view is a sure clue that the globe is out of position.
4. We have explained that a lean to the left would start to occur as the N Pole of Planet X swung round from the right, as
the N Pole of Earth would attempt to evade this, leaning left. This would, as we stated, create a sunarc in the sky that would look increasingly aberrant. Planet X now appears to the right when looking toward the Sun, because the Earth is
attempting to escape to the left, beginning to lean her N Pole away from the N Pole of Planet X which is emerging
from the right hand side.
Do any of these statements apply to the current situation? The Council of Worlds has required an Element of Doubt be in place, not only about the alien presence but about the approaching pole shift, for many reasons. For the alien presence, a
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta287.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:09 AM]
ZetaTalk: Simulating the Seasons
gradual realization on the subconscious level that man is not alone, and intelligent life from elsewhere is visiting, reduces the likelihood of contactees being attacked, burned at the stake by the threatened religious elite or governments. Thus, visitations
are recorded in the subconscious, and the Element of Doubt is inserted when photos or video capture occurs. The Element of
Doubt on the pole shift is to prevent panic in the establishment, premature imposition of Martial Law, which would surely
occur as the establishment has no plan of action other than to save their sorry skins, leaving the common man to his own
resources. Thus, the stalled orbit of Earth is hidden in Apparent Precision while benign aliens, ourselves and others, tip the globe to simulate the seasons. We are also manipulating the globe to simulate constellation normalcy. This may seem a
fantastic and impossible maneuver, but we will explain.
In arranging to create the Element of Doubt as to the stalled orbit, we sometimes have to make choices. In that the rising and
setting Sun would not be noticed by as many, given the workday world rushing to work and eating supper during those times,
and given that the point where the Sun rises and sets could be argued, not likely to be measured by busy people on the go,
this was deemed a lesser problem. If a constellation, well known, simply disappears from the sky, this not only stirs amateurs
on the hunt for them in the night sky but the common man wanting to point these out for their children, stirring many
question. So how has the Earth been arranged, vs a vs the Sun, to allow a more appropriate constellation view? The Big
Dipper, as it appeared to Nancy, was inappropriate for the Fall position, her estimated Oct 15 position. The Fall position at
midnight would have placed it some 1/6 of the way further round the horizon toward the North, and in a different point in its
nightly rotation, the view from the Earth as the globe turns under the starry night, being approximately 25% further along in
its rotation. Thus, the May 25 and Oct 15 views are not all that different, and a slight adjustment in the position of the globe to a 5:00 pm position puts the Big Dipper in the same place as on May 25 at midnight.
Where the manipulation we are required to do differs as the seasons progress, to simulate a May 25
date when the globe is in the Oct 15 position, the following occurred. We tipped the N Pole of
Earth slightly toward the Sun, to bring more hours of daylight, as the Fall position is not yet at the
Equinox of Sept 21, but the Spring position is well past the Equinox of March 21. This tipping puts
the globe on a slight diagonal, which means the North Star, Polaris, and the Southern Celestrial
Pole would be slightly askew, but not to the degree to be noticed by the common man or most
amateur astronomers, who sight on these polar stars, assuming them to be correct, and do not use
landmarks as locators. This diagonal lean of the Earth toward the Sun is what is causing the Sunrise
and Sunset to appear so far to the North, at this time. It also causes an irregular speed of Sunarc, as
the view from the Earth swoops down into daylight at the start of the day, and swoops up at dusk
at the end of the day, rather than a steady path across the sky. Near noon, the Sunarc is running
sideways across the sky, moving rapidly as it is covering more distance per hour. To align a familiar constellation like the
Big Dipper, this sideways tip of the N Pole toward the Sun also assists. If on May 25 the Big Dipper is found in the NW, half
way up in the dome, but on Oct 15 is found in the extreme NNE closer to the horizon, the tipping of the N Pole toward the
Sun places this constellation higher in the dome. For the Big Dipper to also move toward the NW, the N Pole would have to likewise be tipped toward the East, somewhat, toward Planet X rather than away, and this was done. This has produced more
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta287.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:09 AM]
ZetaTalk: Simulating the Seasons
magnetic stress, pushing the magnetic N Pole further to the West, at this time. The Lean to the Left we have predicted to
occur leading into the 3 days of darkness has not as yet begun.
This manipulation, appropriate for the Element of Doubt on May 15, 2006, will change shortly, as each month presents new
challenges to be addressed. For those Insecure, unable to deal with the reality of the presence of Planet X and what this means for their future, unable to deal with the fact of the cover-up and what this means for the likelihood that the
government will protect and care for them in the future, the Element of Doubt is in place. For those astute enough to observe
the anomalies, the quakes and stretch zone accidents and volcanic increases that are not explained by the Global Warming
excuse, the signs are there that things are not right, and the explanation presented by our emissary, Nancy, fits the pieces of
the puzzle together correctly. For most, confused by this lengthy discussion of the many factors at play, our manipulation of
the view, and the constant change likely to occur as the seasons unfold, a simply examination of the latest oddity suffices.
For those into mental gymnastics, careful computation, and putting all the observations together on one page and seeking
what answer might account for them all, our words here this day will be a guide. Those wanting to deny will not deal with all the anomalies or observations, choosing to divide in order to attempt to conquer. But all the facts must be faced, at once, for a fair trial of any theory proposed. If the constellations are correct, then why is the Sunrise and Sunset so aberrant, and
the swoop of the Sunarc irregular?
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta287.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:09 AM]
ZetaTalk: Solstice
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Solstice
written July 1, 2006 on the live GodlikeProduction Radio show.
Nancy has asked for an update on simulating the seasons since the clues have changed somewhat. While the Earth is still in somewhere in the October position, to simulate the seasons as we move past the Summer Solstice, the Earth is
still being skewed off axis, with the N Pole pulled more toward the Sun. For those who would be confused, thinking
we are speaking here of the normal tilt of the Earth during the Summer Solstice, where the N Pole is 23° closer to the
Sun than the S Pole, we are speaking here of a sideways tilt from the Fall position where both Poles would be equally
exposed to sunlight. To effect more daylight, as June 21 is the longest day of the year in the Northern Hemisphere, we
continued to pull Earth off its axis as we did in May but also dropped the Earth below the Ecliptic. Thus, as with the
polar regions which find their skies lit 24 hours a day during their Summer seasons, even when not seeing the sunball,
those areas close to the polar circle are seeing their civil twilight extended, earlier and later, by a considerable period.
Signs of the Times #1616
I bought my house last spring and worked on it all summer. All summer long the sun beat down
directly into our greenhouse - on the south side of the house. This year, the sun doesn't even hit the
greenhouse. [and from another] I live in north east Texas ,about 30 degrees north latitude. As I
understand basic astronomy , the Sun should never be north of my position at noon since I live north
of the tropics. My house is oriented east to west precisely, so it is easy for me to see the sunlight
shining in the northern facing flower beds [Jun 29], which are under an 18" eve. This translates in
my mind to the Sun "tracking" too far north, since the tropic of cancer and capricorn no longer
apply. [and from another] London [Jun 26] For the record Civil Twilight was supposed to begin at
3.57 AM on June 23rd in London. I observed it with my own eyes at 3.03 AM. [and from another]
Romania June 26 'Around here, in summer days, we used to have the twilight ending 9:00-9.30 pm
and up again at about 4.30-4:45. Now that changed. This year, we have the twilight until 10.30-11
pm, and already up again at 3.30-3.45 am. [and from another] In Wisconsin on June 11 sunrise was
12° too far North, on June 30 it was 11° too far North, per Skymap. [and from another] Sweden
[Jun 10] I use a sundial. The 3:15 mark is 20 minutes early.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta299.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:10 AM]
ZetaTalk: Intermittent Lurch
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Intermittent Lurch
written Mar 10, 2007
El PasoTX: Feb28 23:45 pm. The Hunter is
CincinatiOhio: Feb28 5:00 am. I know where
Azi 270-285° and leaning N somewhat and
N, S, E and West are relative to my
entire constellation is visible above Franklin
observation point. I have confirmed them
Mtns. Per Skymap, 240-260° leaning N
through satellite maps and photos. Polaris,
somewhat, yes, too far East by 30°. In a halted itself was East by about 50-60°. At 5:00 am
orbit, 270° is correct for a globe in the Oct 1
the deviation appeared to be maximum. By
position. But the Hunter's belt would be just on 6:00 am it was rapidly correcting towards its
the horizon, for Mar 7 or Oct 1, and this entire expected value. Sun is over Europe, extreme
constellation was high in the sky, above the
lean to the West, 50-60°. Magnetic N Pole is
mountains. An additional 10° for below the
coming into view.
belt and 10° for mountains is needed to be
seen. Thus, 20° too high. Sun is over India, 20° SantiagoChili: Mar7 5:30 am. Hercules
lean to the West. Magnetic N Pole fully
seemed to start 85° [up] measured from the
hidden.
Eastern horizon, and at some 120° [up]
measured from the Northern horizon. Placing
MadridSpain: Mar7 The Sun was to appear at Hercules high in the dome in the SE. Skymap
7:41. It appeared at 7:50: 110-115º East, when expects Hercules Azi 5-45° Alt 7-38°, low in
it was expected to be 90-100º East. Skymap
the dome in the NE. Offset by 50° or more.
expected sunrise at exactly 7:41 at Azi 96°. A Considering the halted orbit, on Oct 1
tad late and 15-20° too far South, the lean El
Hercules should still be at the same Alt but
Paso notes at midnight apparent! Sun is over
more to the North Azi 345-27°. Altitude still
India, 20° lean to the West. Magnetic N Pole
too high by 50° or more. Sun is over Europe,
fully hidden.
extreme lean to the West, 50°. Magnetic N
Pole is not yet in view.
BarabooWI: Mar10 4:25 am. Polaris and Big
Dipper sighted pretty much where expected by
Skymap. What happened to the lean? Cincinati
is almost directly below Wisconsin, on the
Western border of ET, and Wisconsin on the
Eastern border of CT. Chili is a time zone
ahead, so their 4:30 was likewise equivalent to
Cincinati 5:30. This lean appears to be
intermittent. Sun is over Europe, extreme lean
to the West has disappeared. Magnetic N Pole
is not yet in view.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta360.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:10 AM]
ZetaTalk: Intermittent Lurch
Nancy and friends have carefully gathered data to determine where the Earth wobble has gone, as one of the team
noted a dramatic change, Polaris far to the East for a brief time in the early morning in the US. In that this is Winter in
the N American continent, snow and cloud cover heavy and temperatures colder than normal, there have been few star
parties in the hours before dawn. Star parties in any case are normally closer to midnight, with the participants
returning home to bed before dawn. Thus, this extreme would only be noticed by those looking for aberrations, and
taking every opportunity. We warned months ago that something would occur by Feb 25, 2007 that would take the
blinders off those looking to the heavens for a sign, and it has arrived! If the former Figure 8 wobble that developed in
early 2004 and tracked by Nancy and friends until mid-2005 seems gone, it has been replaced by another phenomena more akin to a lurch. If the former Figure 8 wobble involved Planet X grabbing at the highly magnetized Atlantic Rift
and pushing at the N Pole, what's changed?
An unexpected result from the data gathering Nancy and friends did was the finding that the lurch of the N Pole away
from the Sun and Planet X was occurring during the hours when the N Pole of Earth was hidden by the curve of the
Earth. If the N Pole of Planet X is swinging to point toward Earth, hosing magnetic particles toward Earth, then
wouldn't this push logically happen when the N Pole of Earth is facing Planet X directly? N Poles repulse each other.
The answer to this puzzle lies in the way large magnets interact with each other, wanting to either line up end to end or side by side, sharing the same magnetic field, or when unable to achieve either of these positions, to have the minor
magnet nose in at a right angle. When Planet X draws close enough to the Earth to tip the N Pole of Earth away,
causing Earth to lay on her side in a Lean to the Left and then roll into the 3 days of darkness foretold, the N Pole of Planet X will be pointing directly at Earth. This is not yet the case.
We have described the process of the 270° roll as Planet X swings its N Pole around toward Earth in a retrograde,
clockwise, manner. At the current date, this has progressed approximately 137°, not yet pointing the N Pole of Earth directly at Earth, who lies to the left, caught in the cup of the eddy flow from the particles flowing around the sides of
Planet X. In this position, does the Earth align end to end with Planet X or side by side? As with all the planets in the
solar system, which align side by side with the Sun, the dominant magnet, Earth choses the path of least resistance. It can take a temporary side by side with Planet X, which then lays the earth out in the manner discovered during the
pre-dawn hours for the Americas on Feb 28 and Mar 7. This side by side alignment happened, also, at a time when the
magnetic hot spots on Earth were hidden from view, reducing contention with the Sun's magnetic dictates. The N Pole
of Earth is over the curve of the Earth. The highly magnetized Atlantic Rift is just coming into view on the Western
horizon. Where the constellation view in the Americas during such a time, just before dawn, would show a dramatic
lean toward the West, the sunball over Europe and Africa would only show a Sun moving from a Southern to a more
Eastern position during these hours, then quickly traveling toward the West again. If the Sun's rays are beaming down,
how many people bother to note the exact position of the Sun in its arc across the sky during the mid-morning hours?
What of the temporary or intermittent aspect of this lean? Nancy noted no aberrant constellation alignment when she
checked on Mar 10 in the same time frame that Chili and Cincinnati had noted an extreme lean. How is this possible?
We mentioned when the topic of the 270° roll was raised during the live chats on Jan 13 and Feb 3 that Planet X is simultaneously rising to the Ecliptic and turning in place to point it's N Pole outward from the Sun. We mentioned that
rising to the Ecliptic, for Planet X, means that the hose of magnetic particles streaming out of its N Pole encounters a
blast of backwash of particles returning to the Sun's middle at the Ecliptic. If Planet X can envelope the Earth in its
magnetic field when the Earth's magnetic hot spots are hidden from view, but not when they present, then this grip, at
its present distance from Earth and its present progress in its 270° roll, is tenuous. Rising a bit more toward the
Ecliptic, and encountering a stronger headwind in the backwash of returning particles, is all it takes to trip the balance
back to where the Earth aligns with the Sun's magnetic field instead. What this intermittent lean to the West is
showing is the type of gyrations the Earth will undergo as Planet X continues its steady path in the direction of Earth.
Things will not be normal, and sudden adjustments will occur.
What does this new intermittent phenomena, replacing the former Figure 8 wobble, tell mankind? That Planet X has
progressed in its 270° roll or it would not be in a position to demand a temporary side-by-side alignment. That Planet
X has moved closer or it would not have the strength to demand a side-by-side alignment. That Planet X is steadily
rising toward the Ecliptic or the phenomena would not be countered by the backwash of particles at the Ecliptic. Given
these points, that Planet X will be able to impose the 3 days of darkness on Earth when it turns its N Pole hose directly
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta360.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:10 AM]
ZetaTalk: Intermittent Lurch
at Earth. For those wanting to know how much time we have before the press of the last weeks are upon them, we
repeat. No date will be given until the establishment shares with the populace what they know about the approaching
monster. If they, in their elite perch, are privy to information from the Hubble and probes and observatories, then the
least of those among the citizenry deserves the same information. Information is power, and the establishment plans to
use their privy information to harm the common man, not help them as is their obligation. Thus, no date will be given
until the establishment places the common man on their level, and they themselves are on the level of the common
man.
ZetaTalk: Live Chat, written Jan 13, 2007
ZetaTalk: Live Chat, written Feb 3, 2007
The speed of movement through the 270°
roll is not linear. … Another aspect is
We reported recently that Planet X was
the elevation to the Ecliptic, as when
at the 135 degree point. This is not a
slightly below the Ecliptic it can point its
lineal process, as is it also lifting up to
N Pole out into space, but when at the
encounter the Ecliptic backwash. This
Ecliptic, it must hose at an inbound
does not mean it will not move rapidly
particle flow (that man is unaware of in
at times, forcing an adjustment in Earth
the main) and this pushes back against
at the same time. These are matters we
Planet X. Thus, a linear rate cannot be
will not detail at present, as the
assumed. By the same token, rapid
establishment is to stay off kilter, true
movement can happen.
karma for the lack of knowledge they
give the common man about what is
coming.
ZetaTalk: What Magnets Do, written Feb 8, 2004 ZetaTalk: Lean to the Left, written Dec 7, 2005
Earth and Mercury, both with magnetic
Where the 270° roll ends with the N
cores and in close proximity to the Sun,
Pole of Earth pushed away such that the
align alongside of the Sun attempting to
northern hemisphere experiences 3 days
form one large magnet. Bar magnets,
of darkness, one can assume an
free to move, will snap together side by
increased falling of Earth to its side, to
side to form one large magnet, but
the left. The Earth will be basking,
planets held apart from each other or
North to South, in the light of the Sun
their Sun by the gravity Repulsion Force
before this falling to its side rolls into
cannot actually touch.
the 3 days of darkness.
ZetaTalk: Drunken Lurch, written Nov 19, 2004
ZetaTalk: Hell Unleashed, written Jan 2, 2005
The Earth is rotating around geographic
The Figure 8 will become more extreme
poles, which are offset from the
and vicious as the N. Pole of Planet X
magnetic poles by approximately 15
swings into view as it turns in place in a
degrees, loosely up from the S. Pole
clockwise motion, the slow 270° Roll we
toward Tasmania and down from the N.
described in June, 2004. Earth will lay
Pole toward the center of the Canadian
on her side, her magnetic N. Pole
NW Territories. The drunken lurch back
pushed to the [side], a predecessor to
and forth will become more accentuated
the 3 Days of Darkness and Sunrise
as the slow 270° Roll of Planet X
West, laying her hemispheres out for an
continues, with the tilt of the Earth's N
equal basking under the Sun but putting
Pole steadily moving away from the Sun,
the Sun and Moon and especially the
until the 3 Days of Darkness is evident.
constellations in extremely errant
positions.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta360.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:10 AM]
ZetaTalk: IERS Flatlined
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: IERS Flatlined
written Apr 9, 2007
A hot topic on the GLP message board is an aberration on the IERS website. The slight annual circular
magnetic wobble at the N Pole, noted for decades, has suddenly gone left, literally, on the charts. This
occurred around April 4 and lasted until Apr 9. I've checked the HAARP data and found that April 3
seemed normal, but by April 4 HAARP had likewise gone flat and did not pick up to be normal until Apr 9.
Does this have something to do with the roll of Planet X, the hose of magnetic particles from Planet X?
More than an Intermittent Lurch has developed during the 270° Roll of Planet X, as why would it not? Legend has it that 3 days of darkness will ensue during the Biblical end of the world, and we have confirmed this with details of why this will occur. When the N Pole of Planet X points directly at the Earth, this is the reaction, the N Pole of Earth
pointing directly away in an attempt to align end-to-end with Planet X. We have predicted, explained, that going into
this posture the Earth will have a lean to the left, leaning her N Pole away from Planet X as Planet X approaches in his retrograde orbit. The lean to the left is not as extreme as tipping backwards into the 3 days of darkness, but is a
compromise the Earth is attempting, to accommodate both the Sun's magnetic influence as well as the demands from
Planet X. We have explained the Earth wobble, detectable since early 2004 when the Earth encountered Planet X in her orbit, standing in her way, and halted in her orbit. This Earth wobble was a documentable Figure 8 traced by the N
Pole, a pattern which recently changed to a lurch back and forth as the Earth tries to line up end-to-end with Planet X
at times and then snaps back to align with the Sun again. What caused the change in the wobble from a Figure 8 to a
lurch? The Earth is distressed, trying to accommodate different magnetic directives, trying to align with the Sun's
dominant magnetic field while simultaneously accommodating the bully Planet X passing through. The 3 days of
darkness will occur when Planet X has rolled 195° in her roll, where he is currently at approximately 140°. Meanwhile,
what happens?
Clearly, being hosed by the stream of magnetic particles emerging from the N Pole of Planet X is not a mild treatment,
as before the N Pole of Earth tips away into the 3 days of darkness, a physical move of the entire planet, the Earth will
try to accommodate this hose by adjusting her magnetosphere. This is what is showing up on instruments now, a
dramatic change in the old slight circular wobble in the N Pole that has been apparent since man began his
measurements of this slight N Pole wobble. This wobble, a matter of a degree of so, is not the daily Figure 8 wobble
Nancy and her team documented, which was more extreme. In that the Figure 8 occurred daily, and these magnetic
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta367.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:11 AM]
ZetaTalk: IERS Flatlined
measures were taken once a day, averaged, the Figure 8 did not seem to affect the overall outcome between 2004 and
today's date. But now something has occurred, rather suddenly, to change this measure. As anyone playing with
magnets has observed, there are resistance points and points where sudden movement occurs. A magnet placed on
glass has friction between the glass and itself, so does not immediately move to align with a larger magnet moved
toward it under the glass. Then suddenly, there is a jerk, a new alignment.
For the Earth, held in alignment
with the Sun's giant
magnetosphere, there is an
equivalent to friction, resistance,
which is the flow of magnetic
particles moving along the
magnetic field of the Sun, from the
Sun's N Pole round to the Sun's S
Pole. As Planet X rolls, lying
horizontally along the tight
magnetic field lines at the Sun's
Ecliptic, increasingly pointing his
N Pole toward Earth, this creates
in the Earth a confusion, a warping
of the Earth's own magnetic field!
The magnetic N Pole of Earth, the
flow of magnetic particles out of
the N Pole of Earth, will attempt to merge with the N Pole of Planet X, flowing in the same direction. For the Earth,
this is certainly not up, it is sideways. Planet X is hosing out into space, almost directly away from the Sun, as it is
lying horizontally at present during its roll. As the Earth is not yet tipped, physically, into the 3 days of darkness, the
flow of magnetic particles thus emerges, out into space, from points below the Arctic. Nancy has noted that the
HAARP system, located in Alaska near the magnetic N Pole of Earth, has registered flat, likewise. HAARP has been
located next to the N Pole as this is where flux in the magnetosphere is most dramatic, evident. IERS likewise looks to this source, as elsewhere on the globe, flux in the magnetosphere is more flat. In that the magnetic N Pole of Earth has
currently moved, they are both registering flat!
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta367.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:11 AM]
ZetaTalk: Light Towers
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Light Towers
written January 24, 2008
My Soldiers and I witnessed what I think is some
sort of natural phenomenon in the sky over Iraq.
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message483651/pg1
When we described the light emitting properties of Planet X, which is a smoldering brown dwarf, our comments were
met with ridicule by those clinging to the explanations given by the human establishment. Per the human establishment,
a brown dwarf must be huge and gaseous like a partially lit sun, yet Planet X is small and compact like Earth or Mars.
Per the human establishment, a light illuminating process in a sun must involve radiation and heat, yet Planet X is no
warmer than Earth and sustains life. While the human establishment ridicules our scientific explanations, which have invariably proved true, they have no explanation for earthquake lights or even the auroras, both of which cannot be replicated in the laboratory. There have likewise been no explanations offered for what was observed in Iraq and
Germany.
Humans do understand that light can be generated from chemical processes without being accompanied by an
explosion or heat. Light sticks are an example of this simple process being commercialized. There are different
chemicals in the atmosphere of Earth at this time than have been in the memory of man. It has been only during the
past couple years, since the arrival of Planet X into the inner solar system, that Moon halos have been noted, or odd
neon clouds. The wafting tail of Planet X arrived in 2003, which was noted as a time when the red dust first arrived.
We have discussed the chemical qualities of the charged tail of Planet X, which includes not only debris such as gravel
and boulders but also petrochemical components gathered from the Asteroid Belt when it was pelted to pieces in the past. We have described how the moon swirls in the tail of Planet X form tubes that funnel light toward one end, thus
appearing as a light orb to those who see the moon swirl while peering down one end of the tube. Is there a relationship of these light towers and tornado shapes appearing on Earth now to the moon swirls in the tail of Planet
X? Indeed there is. Light is bent within the moon swirl by chemicals swirling there there to flow down the tube and
emerge at an end.
Light bends, a fact known to man as rainbows spread across the light spectrum bent only by the water in the clouds.
Light is bent by water, a fact known to any child who wonders why his feet are displaced when he stands in a pool of
water. Light bends when going through a prism, solid glass. An oil smear on the window will also create a rainbow in
the sunlight. Light also follows the flow of electrons, which anyone watching a lightning display understands. These
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta430.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:12 AM]
ZetaTalk: Light Towers
light particles were not generated from thin air by the flow of electrons. They were attracted to the charge and bent to
follow the flow, and thus emerged into view in the vicinity of the lightning path. The tail of Planet X is charged due to
the iron oxide dust particles disbursed throughout the tail. This charge has nowhere to go, as the tail is not grounded. It
is essentially static electricity. But when the red dust and petrochemical components in the tail waft into Earth's
atmosphere where there is free oxygen and nitrogen, chemical reactions not occurring out in space are possible.
Man is used to thinking of chemical reactions involving petrochemical components and
oxygen as an explosion, happening suddenly - boom! But where disbursed and present
in barely perceptible quantities, it is more akin to a slow swoosh, creating a spiral of
heat that starts a tornado effect in the atmosphere. Where a slow explosion has passed,
the smoke created can linger, looking like a dark tornado floating in the air. Where the
slow explosion occurs at night, the light can seem dramatic for the few minutes it lasts.
This is a chemical reaction in the atmosphere, as we stated earlier in response to the
initial report from Iraq. More such light towers can be anticipated, but beyond this,
more effects from the tail of Planet X can be anticipated as the tail components increase
in density in the atmosphere of Earth. What these effects will be we will not say, as we
prefer to have the establishment caught off guard so that the cover-up stumbles and the public learns the truth. The
establishment knows what is coming, but is keeping the truth from the public, who like the elite have a right to know.
I thought first it was a tornado, but then it started to glow and the stripe become brighter.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta430.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:12 AM]
ZetaTalk: Light Towers
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta430.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:12 AM]
ZetaTalk: Planets
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Planets
Note: written on Mar 15, 1996.
Some of the larger planets are assumed to be primarily gaseous, small Suns, perhaps, that didn't make the grade
because they were too small, their lack of bulk preventing them from either lighting or attracting planets themselves.
This concept is in the main correct, beyond the fundamental fact that suns and gaseous planets are not composed
entirely of light elements. Quite the contrary, and they invariably have heavy elements at their core, though large,
gaseous planets should be looked upon as no different than the small but more dense planets when contemplating their
influence on a solar system.
Planets find their niche, based on how crowded the solar system is and their relative mass. For instance, if Jupiter were
not in your Solar System, the planets close in to the Sun would have essentially the same orbits, though would fan out
a bit more. A planet's position is based primarily on the gravity attraction between it and its sun and the concurrent
repulsion force invoked. If the niche a planet would normally assume is already taken, as was the case when the
clobbered Earth wobbled out of the Asteroid Belt into her current orbit, then more than one planet may settle into the
same orbit, sharing this. Why then are smaller planets, such as Mars and Pluto, further out? Small planets may fail to
drift into a closer orbit due to the buffering action of larger planets closer in. Essentially a bumping occurs, where the
smaller planet is repulsed outward by a larger planet. Timing is everything in this matter, as twins in an orbit may
occur if they come into the orbit at a distance from each other, where a close passage at key points would produce
bumping.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s63.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:13 AM]
ZetaTalk: Orbits
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Orbits
Note: written on Jan 15, 1996.
The orbit of planets is guided by several factors, only one of which is the gravitational influence of the Sun, though
that is, of course, the strongest. Humans ascribe an inordinate amount of weight, in orbits, to what they perceive as the
existing, or static, motion. They assume the orbit is constant, having been in place since the inception of the Solar
System. They assume the distance from the Sun is maintained by centrifugal force, pulling away from the Sun. They
assume the rotation of planets is a constant, and having no explanation for rotation ascribe it also to motion having
been in place since the inception of the Solar System. Humans view the result of many factors they do not understand,
and ascribe this result to inappropriate causes. They are wrong on all counts, but as the Solar System does not change
in its motion before their eyes, this is not often up for debate. Rigid minds have no reason to change. Comfortable
theories have no uncomfortable challenges.
The orbiting planets are indeed caught in the Sun's gravitational field, but there is more than gravity and motion at play
in maintaining the distance they do from the Sun. The orbits are scarcely fast enough to create a centrifugal force
strong enough to keep them at a distance from the Sun. Planets do not drift into the Sun, in the main, due to a
repulsion force generated in both bodies. Where the force of gravity is constant, and steadily pulls a smaller object
toward a larger, a repulsion force is generated between objects, and only becomes strong enough when the mass of the
two objects is sufficient. Do binary Sun's maintain their dance around each other, always at the same distance, by
accident? Tiny objects, such as comets or meteors which regularly crash into the Sun or the orbiting planets, do not
generate a repulsion force sufficient to counteract gravity, due to their tiny mass in proportion to the Sun or planet.
When their paths bring them close, they are caught in the gravity pull.
Orbiting planets are in motion because they are attracted to more than the Sun's gravitational field, more than the Sun's dark twin which acts as the 12th Planet's second focus, and certainly more than each other, although that is a small
factor. Do the stars maintain their distance from each other by accident? For those who doubt that there are
gravitational influences outside of the Solar System, pulling on the orbiting planets, we would point to the elliptical
path that planets assume. Why an ellipse? If the planets were concerned only with the Sun, or with each other, they
would not assume the path they do. Planets assume an elliptical orbit for the same reason that comets leave the Solar
System. They are listening to more than one voice. As to why this voice but not another calls to this planet but not
another, the answer lies in the force of gravity, which is not at all as simple as humans assume. Gravity has many
nuances, depending on composition and distance, and what influences one body toward another may have little effect
on other bodies.
Why do repeating comets, which clearly set into an orbit around the Sun during a good portion of their time within the
Solar System, escape? If one assumes that planets are not escaping because the circular or elliptical orbit is stable, then
why not apply the same logic to comets? Humans do not apply this logic to comets because it doesn't compute, so deal
with the contradiction by falling into magical explanations for the behavior of comets. The answer to this riddle is that
neither orbit is stable, but that the comet, being tiny, can escape from the Sun's gravitational pull more easily than the larger planets, just as it can be caught in a collision course to the Sun or a planet, due to its tiny size. Even repeating
comets, which are assumed to have only one focus, the Sun, are listening to more than one voice. They leave the Sun,
having settled momentarily into an orbit around the Sun, and head toward the one or more other gravitational influence
that dominates their life. Some comets orbit, briefly, these other foci, and some simply get drawn back toward the Sun.
In this case they appear to humans to have a long ellipse orbit.
Elliptical orbits have no explanation if one is to consider that the Sun or other planets are the only gravitational
influences. In particular, the elliptical orbit of a repeating comet cannot be explained, as when it leaves the Sun it is
heading straight away, and has no curve or angular momentum that would bring it round to where it is seen reentering
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s53.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:14 AM]
ZetaTalk: Orbits
the Solar System. When out in space, slowing due to the gravitational pull of the Sun to its back, it drifts toward the
other gravitational focus it is sensitive to. There are three voices the repeating comet is listening to at this point.
the Sun behind its back, which is an increasing voice as the comet loses speed due to this same gravitational pull
the second gravitational influence, which it begins curving toward
its momentum away from the Sun
By the time its momentum stops, as stop it does, the comet is positioned such that it will return to the Solar System in
what appears to humans to be an elliptical manner, and not return whence it came. The position of the apparent ellipse
of a repeating comet's orbit is in fact caused by the position of the second or more gravitational foci of this comet.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s53.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:14 AM]
ZetaTalk: Elliptical Orbits
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Elliptical
Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.
Clearly, more than the regular flow of gravity particles from and back into a Sun is at play in planetary orbits, else all
these orbits would be circular. There are countless influences, but these influences can be summarized into their effect, which accounts for an elliptical orbit.
Secondary Gravity Influence
Planets that orbit both binary suns do so in a figure 8, pulling toward the second binary at the
juncture where the planet is positioned between the binaries, but propelled by momentum to
continue its orbital curve while moving toward the second binary. But planets caught between
binary suns, but orbiting a single sun, pull wider toward the second binary in their orbit, creating an
ellipse that leans toward the second binary.
Escape Attempt
Just as two North Poles in a magnetic object will avoid each other, pushing the lighter object to
align with the heavier object, other repulsion forces can push an orbiting planet closer to its Sun
than the flow of gravity particles would ordinarily allow, putting the planet in a squeeze between
these repulsion forces. The result is a rush to leave the squeeze, such that the planet accelerates at
this point in its orbit, giving it momentum as it stretches into the long part of the ellipse.
Dithering
Planets positioned such that they have several attractions can be slowed in their orbit due to
dithering. Such dither points are not even in the orbit, so create a speeding up as the planet
approaches the dither point, and a slowing down as it leaves this point. Rushing to an attraction
causes the orbit to draw long at that point, a factor of momentum on the orbiting planet, which is an
influence toward an elliptical orbit. Where no apparent gravitational giant exists to explain the
elliptical orbit, particle flows other than gravity are the dominant influence on the shape of the orbit.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s109.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:14 AM]
ZetaTalk: Slowing Probes
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Slowing Probes
Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.
An unknown force seeming to pull on a pair of distant space probes has left astronomers with a weighty mystery,
one that appears to defy the conventional laws of physics. The Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 spacecraft, which for
decades have steadily traveled in opposite directions in the solar system, have covered significantly less space then
they should have.
CNN
Why do the probes slow? It is not gravity, the Sun pulling these probes back, but particle flows that mankind is
currently unaware of. Why do the planets in the solar system all line up into the ecliptic plane? This phenomena occurs
in the rings around Saturn also, and in the oceans of Earth which are fatter at the equator than at the poles. Visible
matter, the planets and rings and oceans, that mankind can see, are slung faster from the waist of a rotating sun or
planet than at the poles, a matter of momentum But it is not the sling that keeps them at the waist, as a sling alone
would not keep them nicely in place, a ring around the waist. There is a return of some type, with the return coming
back into the rotating sun or planet at the poles, and then flowing in the direction of the waist, to fill the gap caused by
the sling. This is not caused by the flow of gravity particles, as the flow of gravity particles is even. Does an object
weigh more at the poles than at the equator? Nor is this the flow of magnetic particles, as the rings around Saturn and
the planets in the ecliptic assume their position regardless of magnetic properties.
The solar wind is not visible to man, yet its effect on comet tails is quite visible. Likewise, the flow of these particles,
unknown to mankind, which force the planets into the ecliptic plane, can be inferred from the fact that the ecliptic
exists, alone. The probes, propelled beyond the grip of the Sun’s gravitational field to where their momentum can
counteract this draw, were expected to float along at a predictable rate, yet are doing so more slowly. The answer lies
in the wash back of the particle flows that keep the planets bobbling in the ecliptic plane and the rings of Saturn so
neatly in a thin line. Just as the fatter oceans around Earth’s equator flow toward the poles, thence wrapping around in
deep ocean current back toward the equator, this particle flow is not even in the pressure it exerts. There is pressure
from the side as well as back toward the rotating sun or planet that is the gravitational giant holding the bobbling
matter in its grip. The closer the bobbling matter is to the equator of a rotating object, the more pressure there is from
the side, pushing the matter into the ring or ecliptic plane.
The probes were in part sent out to explore the planets in the solar system, and were directed by their jets or a
gravitational sling around the planets being visited during their voyage. Thus, the force of gravity from the Sun alone
was not the single force influencing the probes until they floated to where they are today. They now, presumably, have
only their momentum and the gravity pull from the Sun as factors in their pace. Add to this the factor of a returning
particle flow, pushing outward at the ecliptic but immediately upon leaving the ecliptic plane flowing back toward the
Sun. As the particle flow leaves the ecliptic, it is flowing toward the side, away from the ecliptic, but in the backward trip, it is buffeting from the other side, as the currents of this flow become circular around the ecliptic close in, as well
as circular in broad circles that extent to the poles of the Sun. This buffeting from the side affects the rate of escape in
the probes, as they are making side trips, this way and that, however infinitesimal, and this likewise takes time. How
would it not? If a man walks in a forward motion only, he will arrive faster than another who takes the time to dance
to the side, this way or that, now and then.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s108.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:15 AM]
ZetaTalk: Orbital Plane
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Orbital Plane
Note: written on Apr 15, 1996.
Planets orbiting a sun invariably line up into an orbital plane, looking a bit, if one were to speed up the process, like a
flying saucer. Why would this be so, and is there a relationship to the shape that solar systems take and the familiar
shape of our ships? There is indeed a relationship, as what is termed the flying saucer is shaped to simulate the gravity
dynamics of a solar system so that it can become its own little solar system when instigating its own gravity field. A
flying saucer in motion can turn sideways or upside down, and the passengers are unaffected. They are, gravity-wise,
in their own little world. Solar systems do not take this shape by accident, though there is no comparable effect on
Earth for man to study and point to. Gaseous planets, such as Saturn, have rings in a plane, but nothing orbiting the
Earth, man-made or otherwise, is so affected.
The planets are lined up in a plane not because of anything inherent in themselves, but because of a drama that is
taking place in their sun. All suns, being hot and therefore liquid or vaporous in the main, rotate, and do so for the
same reasons that the Earth rotates - parts of the core are seeking to escape this or that side of the Universe, and due to
the motion of rotation that this escape attempt initiates, these same parts find themselves back where they started from,
not having any brakes as it were in a liquid or vaporous environment. The Sun's influence on its planets is more than
light, more than the solar wind in all its components, more than the magnetic field it generates which reaches out
beyond the planets. The Sun's rotation reflects the influences on it, those parts of the Universe that exert a gravitational pull or a magnetic clash, or if there are other large bodies close enough, a repulsion force.
A sun's rotation does not just happen, it begins due to attraction or repulsion. This is what begins the motion. A sun's rotation reflects this, and whatever rotation institutes within the sun has a dominant effect on the planets that are about
the sun. Why do the planets not orbit in all directions? Logically, if there were no enforcement, it would be chance, yet
it seems instead to be the rule. A sun's rotation indicates where the dominant forces are on the sun, and these dominant
forces effect more than the sun. They rule the planets too, pulling and pushing on them, as well. But beyond these
outside influences, the rotation of a sun has an effect on her planets, as the streams within her core, being uneven in
their composition, pull and push on the planets as they may be susceptible to these forces. Thus, coalescing planets
may not start out all in a line, but as they are pushed and pulled they tend to move as far or as near as they can get, and in the end, are in a line with the sun's moving parts, as this is where far and near lie.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s64.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:16 AM]
ZetaTalk: Binary Orbits
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Binary Orbits
Note: written on Nov 15, 1995.
How often do planets, such as your Sun's 12th Planet, take up an orbit around two suns rather than remaining
dedicated to one sun. Rarely, as this requires the wanderer to be large enough that a strong repulsion force develops
when it approaches one of the suns and to also have congealed after a big bang in such a position between the two
suns that this binary orbit ensues. If close to one sun it will settle into the normal orbit around this single sun. But if
fairly equidistant it will approach one sun with comet like speed and return in the same direction, as comets do, to
begin its binary orbit.
Are such binary orbits always disruptive to life on planets orbiting one or the other of the suns? Most certainly,
depending upon the placement of the planets, angle of entry into the planetary orbital plane, and relative size of the
wanderer. If the wanderer is small, its action is like a comet. If the wanderer is larger than planets it passes, then
scenarios such as pole shifts can potentially occur. This likelihood is further reduced by the magnetic potential, which
is strong or weak depending on the composition of the planets and wanderer. This potential is further weakened by the
relative number of life bearing planets that are dry land planets, as most life bearing planets are water planets. Life in the water, during earthquakes, is not traumatized to the degree that life on land is traumatized. Water cushions any
trajectories by braking the speed.
Thus the periodic trauma your Earth undergoes as a life bearing planet is quite unusual. Where this happens elsewhere
in the Universe the inhabitants have reacted much as humans have - with denial beforehand and deliberate amnesia
afterwards. In this, you are typical.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s42.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:16 AM]
ZetaTalk: Planet Revolutions
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Planet Revolutions
Note: written on Jan 15, 1997.
The slow motion of planets around the Sun has long puzzled mankind, who are acutely aware that without continuing
impetus to motion, motion stops. Only in dead space, where no gravitational attraction or repulsion forces exist, does
motion continue without impetus. Motion without a continuing impetus is eroded by gravitational influences nearby, as
in the case of an object thrown upward which slows gradually until turning to plummet to Earth. Children learn with a
ball on the end of a string that standing still results in the ball dropping to the ground, as only the continued impetus of
their arm throwing the ball away and up from them keeps the ball in motion in an orbit. This same pattern is apparent in satellites sent aloft to circle the Earth, as they are in a slow plummet and eventually plunge to Earth.
What keeps the planets, perpetually, the same distance from the Sun and their motion around the Sun at the same
pace?
Understanding only part of the phenomena, and unable to admit they do not understand, humans have engaged in
elaborate mathematical descriptions of the motion they observe, but descriptions do not suffice as an explanation. The
explanation eludes modern astronomers and physicists because they are considering only some of the factors, and are
no further along on the matter of motion than their counterparts in the middle ages. To best understand motion,
mankind should throw out all prior arguments and look upon the matter with the clear eyes of a child.
If a planet is slowly orbiting a massive Sun, but does not drift into it, then obviously there is a repulsion force as
well as the gravitational attraction humans are so painfully familiar with. We have described this force as the
Repulsion Force, and though mankind is not specifically aware of it from their long history on the face of the
planet Earth, this does not mean that this force does not exist.
If a planet is continuing in a steady orbit, without any impetus such as the propulsion humans find necessary to
keep their probes and satellites from drifting off the path they are set upon, then something is either steadily
pulling or pushing the planet to maintain its orbit in the face of all other influences. The influence of the orbiting
planets upon each other would otherwise, over time, alter the orbits dramatically. Why would they not? Each
time a given planet lined up with the massive Jupiter, and was perturbed to speed up or slow down due to this
influence, unless there were another influence this perturbed planet would remain in motion a bit slower or
faster, perpetually.
If the planets resume their motion around the Sun after being perturbed by each other, then the impetus setting
them in motion is not inherent in the planets as an influence upon each other. A planet slowed by the influence
of Jupiter behind its path would not speed up again to resume its steady pace unless this other impetus existed.
This other impetus, which does exist, has the same basis as the magnetic alignment of the Earth and her Sun. This
influence reaches beyond the Solar System, and dictates motion within the Sun not visible to mankind but nevertheless
present. Just as the core of the Earth revolves at a speed dictated by the thickness of the Earth's liquid core, to chase
away from or toward magnetic influences that exist in the Solar System, just so the Sun's core rotates, dragging her
children around her like baubles on the ends of her apron strings.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s81.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:17 AM]
ZetaTalk: Perturbations
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Perturbations
Note: written on Jan 15, 1997.
What does perturb mean? This is recorded in a change in the motion, else it would be a meaningless term. I could say
the planets harumpf, but give no evidence of this, and none would agree. Therefore, perturb gives evidence, and this evidence is a slowing or speeding up, or a wider orbit or closer orbit, but it most certainly does not mean no change.
Given that the planets change when they are perturbed, they should stay changed, according to man's theory. If an orbit swings wide to move toward a giant it is passing, should not the orbit stay wide then? If a planet slows slightly
due to a giant's gravity attraction behind it, should it not stay slower? Human astrophysics has two discomfiting
notions they use as guides in this situation. They can't put these notions together, so like two passengers in the back
seat of a car who can't talk to each other, they stare out opposite windows and pretend the other doesn't exist.
1. The first notion is that the orbit of planets is due to a state of equilibrium between the gravity pull of the sun and
an original straight-line forward motion of the planet. This notion assumes the planet got caught in the gravity of
the sun to the extent that it is in a perpetual tug of war between this gravity pull and its momentum on the
original path. The fact that, almost invariably, all the planets orbit in the same direction is presumed to be due to
the original path of the planets being conveniently all in the same direction. Conveniently, that is, for the notion.
2. The second notion describes another phenomenon that is also visible and measurable to humans - perturbations.
Perturbations are known to man as they can observe and record the actions of two planets passing each other in
their orbits. The smaller one will speed up upon approach to the larger, due to the gravity tug between the two,
and after passing will slow down in a comparable manner, lingering as it were. The larger planet has also been
perturbed, and however slightly has slowed to meet the approaching smaller planet and likewise will try to tag
along with the exiting smaller planet. If neither planet were in motion, it could be argued that the speed of the
orbits should net out so they are returned to the same point. Both planet orbits have also altered in their shapes,
but as this challenges the first human notion it is never addressed.
There are several problems for humans here, none of which are addressed due to the discomfort factor. While the
larger planet is slowing to pull toward the smaller planet, on its approach, the smaller planet finds the larger coming to
meet it and increases its speed toward the larger somewhat due to this. The point of passage is not equidistant in the perturbation swath, it is placed toward the early part of the drama, due to this, with the rush to meet being quicker and
taking place in a shorter period of time than the lingering exiting phase. Since the two planets are traveling in the same
direction, they spend more time together during the exiting phase than the approach.
If either the larger or smaller planet were standing still, the human argument that the speed of orbit is compensated
upon approach and exit might be valid, but as they are both moving, the perturbation is not equal on both sides. Net -
the smaller planet should be slowed overall in its orbital speed, as it has the larger planet in close proximity behind it for a longer period of time. This is due to the larger planet tagging along behind the smaller planet. Net - the larger
planet should be sped up overall in its orbital speed, as it is being encouraged to chase the smaller planet now ahead of it for a longer period of time. This should be intuitively obvious to humans, who find the car slows more, overall, the
longer the brakes are applied. To state that the length of time is irrelevant would be absurd.
More than the speed of the orbit is affected when orbiting planets perturb each other, the shape of the orbits is also
affected. Given a smaller planet passing on an inside track and orbiting at a faster speed, the smaller planet will pull
outward toward the larger during passage. Thus, its orbit has been changed, as for a period of time it is tracking along
in a wider curve, at a greater distance from its sun. According to the human explanation for orbits - that they represent
an equilibrium between the planets forward motion and the gravity tug from the sun such that the forward motion has
been bent into a curve, and that the equilibrium is maintained by centrifugal force caused by the continuing tug of the
forward motion - this new orbit shape should be maintainable with no need for the planet to return to its pre-
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s83.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:17 AM]
ZetaTalk: Perturbations
perturbation state.
We have asserted that the equilibrium of orbits is maintained by a combination of not only the gravity tug from the sun
but also by the repulsion force that has been generated between the planet and its sun, and the planets being swept
ahead of rotating energy fields thrown out from the sun like long sweeping arms. That the perturbed planets return to
their pre-perturbation state is in line with our explanation, not the human explanation for orbits. Nevertheless, our
explanation is called wacky and the dictates of the gods of science whom childish humans cling to in their desperate
need for security in an uncertain world once again perpetuate the Dark Ages of Astronomy, which are with mankind
still.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s83.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:17 AM]
ZetaTalk: Centrifugal Force
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Centrifugal Force
Note: written on Jan 15, 1997.
Motion is not a thing, immutable, unchangeable, eternal, once born at the start, as during a big bang or whatever, never
to go away. Motion is not a thing, it is a result, a reaction, and as such it changes. Human astronomers explain orbits
as a balance between a straight line motion tangental to the sun and a gravity tug to the side, and assume that the
forward motion is translated into a centrifugal force that never erodes as it is a thing. This looks good on paper, but
examine the reality a bit closer and the contradictions and inadequacy of that argument emerge.
Each time an orbiting object corrects its straight line path due to gravity tug, its straight line path would be diminished
in its intensity. Is this not the case in your all-too-familiar situation of having to put on the brakes when driving? The
car is in motion along a flat plane, propelled continuously only as long as the foot is on the gas pedal. This equates to
the forward or tangential motion of the planet. Should one brake simultaneously while still stepping on the gas, the car
slows. This equates to the interference in the orbiting planet's tangential motion caused by gravity. Now take the foot
off the pedal, and you do not have the same forward motion as before. It was not a thing, but a reaction, and now it is a reaction to the push caused by the foot on the gas while starting from the car's state of rest.
Just so, the orbiting planet requires a continual push, from something, in order to continue to move. Left without this
push, the object would steadily spiral into the sun, and humans would scarcely have had time to evolve into intelligent
creatures pondering this scenario as the spiral would not take all that long! This spiral is what happens to your Earth
orbiting satellites, which are often kept aloft only due to a puff now and then from the jets built into them. Left alone,
they spiral to Earth, the gravity tug affecting their forward motion each instant. The gravity tug is not strictly a
sideways tug, as in all cases the planet's path is pointed away from the sun, however slightly. For any given instant
moment:
1. draw a line representing the planet's straight line path,
2. draw a second line representing the path the planet is being set upon by the gravity tug, essentially a second
tangent to the sun,
3. the angle between these two lines is the degree of backward tug that the planet is experiencing.
Thus, there is erosion in the forward motion, which is not a thing but a reaction. In order to keep the planet
continuously revolving, there must be a push, and a push there is. It is caused by the swirling matter in the sun's core, which creates fields of influence such as magnetic fields that affect the orbiting planets to varying degrees depending
upon their composition. Why do you suppose that planets orbit all in the same direction? Is it by accident that this
same pattern presents in all solar systems? Retrograde planet motion is the extreme exception, so the fact that planets
invariably revolve in the same direction should be a compelling clue to anyone seeking an explanation for why planets
continue to revolve.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s84.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:18 AM]
ZetaTalk: Satellite Orbits
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Satellite Orbits
Note: written on Mar 15, 1996.
From the Moon, the Earth looks quite round, though is it anything but round. The Earth is lumpy, all her land mass on
one side so that her gravity center is a bit more landside than seaside. And with her waters bulging at the equator, she
tends to be squat with a bit of spread about the middle, so a circling satellite would appear to be lower over the equator
than in fact it actually is, in relationship to the gravity center.
Satellites intended to go round and round over the poles, or anywhere but the exact equator, must be moved out of the
circular path around the Earth's gravity center which they naturally assume. The satellite when launched indeed hugs
the gravity center of the Earth uniformly, circling the lump, but this leaves the satellite masters unhappy as the satellite
is not a uniform distance above the Earth's surface, be it land or water. They then puff the satellite about until it is not
circular about the lump, the gravity center, but is a uniform distance from the surface, be it land or water, in other
words, is an ellipse. The reason they have so much trouble achieving a uniform distance from the surface is not
because the satellite wants to go in an ellipse, but rather the opposite, because it wants to go in a circle about the
gravity center of the lumpy Earth. It has to be tweaked out of this into an artificial orbit, into an ellipse!
Earth's center of gravity may have been nicely centered when she first congealed after the local Big Bang, but she is as
centered as a three legged elephant now. The collision that sent her out of her former orbit in the Asteroid Belt and
into the orbit she is currently in left her as oddly shaped as Halley's comet, and only her waters, pooling evenly about
her, covered her scars. Over time she has molded herself, during repeated passages of her big brother, the 12th Planet,
so that her molten core is circular, but her crust is anything but even. Depth of the oceans and distribution of the land
masses is not all there is to it, as the composition of the crust must be factored in also. Lava flows from the depths
have a different composition than the original crust of the Earth, heavier, and where these flows have spewed forth
repeatedly during traumatic times, there is a gravity weight in that direction - the sum of the parts, wherever they may
lie
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s62.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:18 AM]
ZetaTalk: Trajectories
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Trajectories
Note: written on Feb 15, 1996.
Trajectories that parallel the surface of a large object exerting a strong gravitational pull lob up, then curve, and finally
drop straight down, upon close examination. Some shots low to the ground barely get into their downward drop before
arriving on the surface, and thus this point is missed on those not astute. But videotaped trajectories, examined in a
frame by frame manner, display this scenario:
The object desires to go in a straight line, in the direction pointed in and impelled.
As the gravity pull is at its side, the straight line is diminished into a curve, as the drop of the object due to
gravity is superimposed on the trajectory. The magical curve, in fact, is a combination of linear momentum and
gravity drop.
When the object reaches its apex, the linear momentum no longer is away from the gravitational giant, as the
object now is pointed toward the giant. This is a significant turning point, no pun intended, as from this point
forward the object now finds that its linear momentum and its gravity drop are combined, and thus, with this
combined force, it ends up heading straight down.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s59.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:19 AM]
ZetaTalk: Oort Cloud
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Oort Cloud
Note: written on Jan 15, 1996. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
Ah, the theoretical Oort Cloud. As with the mythical Quark - give it a name and it becomes real. It is not real. Humans
assume that comets just happen along, and sometimes get caught in a repeating cycle. Humans speculate on the origin
of comets. The majority of comets visiting your Solar System return because they originated here, during planetary
breakups caused by the periodic passage of the 12th Planet, for one. Look to the nature of your Solar System, the
composition and shape of the planets. How would irregularly shaped chunks of ice, which in essence comets are,
begin? The Earth was once a water planet, but lost much of her water following a collision with a traveling moon of
the 12th Planet. Where do you suppose her waters went?
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s51.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:19 AM]
ZetaTalk: Repeating Comets
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Repeating Comets
Note: written on Jan 15, 1996. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
Repeating comets are attracted to the Sun, are heading for it, but miss due to the same sensitivity to the solar wind that
causes their dust clouds and gasses to blow away from the Sun. Humans assume that tiny particles will be more
affected by the solar wind than larger particles, but this assumption is wrong. If this were the case, then how to explain
the Asteroid Belt, which has trash of all sizes, seemingly unaffected by the solar wind. A small object may lose its
velocity faster than a larger object, due to the gravitational differences, but the effect is the same when they are
sensitive to the solar wind - they are pushed away. Comets that hit the Sun have, through repeated trips around the Sun,
lost enough water vapor so that the balance of their composition weighs against repulsion by the solar wind. In short,
they've lost their protection. They come zooming in from outer space, but this time, they don't veer out, they collide. In fact, comets close their orbits, coming closer and closer to the Sun, during this process.
Where a repelling force exists, such as the solar wind against a comet, the comet will veer out upon approach and as it
gains speed coming into the Solar System, veer in again. The increasing speed of comets allows them to push past their
sensitivity to the solar wind, to some degree. Thus they have a quick trip around the Sun while held at the distance
where they are essentially getting a blast of wind they cannot proceed against.
The solar wind is steady, its change incremental, as with every measure closer the intensity increases by a similar
steady measure. The length away that the comet maintains is not explained by an analogy such as a car hitting a brick
wall or a diver entering the water or even a man walking into a hurricane. The comet is slipping to the side as it
approaches, going in the direction of least pressure, of least resistance, while still aiming for the Sun. The point where
this balance is reached is dependent on the speed of the comet, which increases steadily the closer it gets to the Sun,
and the intensity of the blast from the solar wind. At every point along its orbit, these determinators are at play. When
out in space the comet's pace is relatively sedate, and thus slides to the side rather than approaching the Sun directly.
When it enters your Solar System the reverse is occurring - the speed effect overcoming the solar wind push, so that
the comet curves toward the Sun, but always these two factors are at play.
Quite clearly some comets are periodic, as they appear regularly after a set number of years, approach from the same
direction, turn around within the Solar System at the same place, exit the Solar System in the same direction, and give
the same predictable appearance. But comets that have a long period have been documented in the past in a manner
that leaves much doubt. Where astronomers within this very millennium assumed the Sun orbited the Earth, just how
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s50.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:21 AM]
ZetaTalk: Repeating Comets
accurate can their records have been? And how does one know that a previous comet is returning, even when it
approaches from the same direction? Is it not possible to have more than one comet with the same track through the
Solar System? Humans are barely out of the Dark Ages, and if honest would admit that they are guessing. Do they
have these comets marked? Do they have an accurate basis of comparison? What are they judging on, the pencil sketch
made by someone in antiquity?
Humans think that because mankind spots comets as they loom into range, announcing themselves by outgassing
as they enter the Solar System, that human scientists know where the comet has been, and know what its orbit
has been. They do not. They can't find these tiny dark specks when they are out in space. When they catch sight
of them, the comet orbits are already taking into account their sensitivity to the solar wind. This curve starts well
outside the Solar System, a fact known by astronomers.
Humans think that a comet's orbit is maintained by its momentum. Of the factors affecting a tiny comet that
approaches the Sun, the force of its current momentum is not dominant. Any child who has thrown a ball and
watched it drop toward the Earth as it sped along its trajectory can sense this. Archers allow for this in
attempting to hit their target, aiming above the trajectory to account for the drop. Momentum is an effect, not a
cause. What caused the momentum if not gravity. A ball thrown in space, where there is no gravitational
influences nearby, will continue apace, but a gravity pull behind its path will slow it down. When a comet is
leaving your Solar System, it is heading at an essentially straight line away. Gravity behind the comet slows it
down, and thus the momentum disappears.
Humans see but what is essentially the end result of a comet's orbit, or at least that portion of the orbit that
involves the Sun's gravity. The tiny comet, dark until it enters the Solar System where it flares under the
influence of the Sun, cannot be located by humans while it is out in space. They assume that the orbit is broader
or at least as broad, when out in space, as that seen when the comet becomes visible. It is not. As we have
explained in detailing the 12th Planet's entry into the Solar System, comets aim for the Sun, and if influenced
away from the Sun by any factor, adjust their orbit away from the Sun. Then, as they near the Sun and, caught in
the grip of this giant's gravity pull, accelerate, the increasing speed allows them to come closer. Humans only see
that part of the orbit where the initial adjustment away from the Sun has already occurred. They see but half the
picture.
The human argument that the long orbit can be determined by the angle of entry, the parabolic curve, is therefore
absurd. Some long period comets have several foci, and some only one. Just how does blind man, peeping up from a
planet he cannot leave, looking out from a Solar System he has never left, know how many foci this or that comet
has? Since a parabola and even an ellipse smoothes to an essentially straight line, how do they know how far that
straight line goes before a turn around is effected? They do not. They are guessing.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s50.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:21 AM]
ZetaTalk: Ephemeris
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Ephemeris
Note: written on Oct 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
Ephemeris are mankind's best efforts at predicting the behavior of comets. They take into consideration the direction
and speed of a comet, when first sighted, and apply math that has proved true of previous comets. Most of the time
this works. When it does not astronomers tell themselves a variable came into play, such as the gravitational pull of a
nearby planet or that something internal within the comet caused it to behave in an abnormal manner. The ephemeris
are assumed to be correct. They are not. Humans have backed into their formulas for explaining the motion of the
planets, and gravity on the surface of their planet. They tried one theory on after another, until one seemed to work
most of the time. Then they congratulate themselves on arriving at the ultimate answer, which will stay on the pedestal
until it fails to answer some physical phenomena, new to their arena.
The human understanding of Orbital Physics is based on what they have observed. They backed into their
understanding, their mathematical theories, based on what they had seen. Thus, when they plot the orbit of an object
tracking in a familiar manner, they plot it reasonably well. This does not mean that the math is accurate or correct. It
only means that their descriptions, up until now, have worked in the main. We are not saying that human equations fail
to predict comet orbits. We say the base understanding of the full comet orbit is incomplete. We say the theories about
where comets come from is incorrect. We say the explanation of why comets don't all go into the Sun is wrong. If the
mailman comes by each morning about 10:00 o'clock, the child may make up any number of complicated theories
about why and how the mailman's route is as it is. Then, when the mailman arrives the next day, on time, the child
congratulates himself.
Ephemeris assume, first, that comets are attracted to the Sun, are aiming for it, but miss. What nonsense! Why do they
miss? Did the Sun move out of the way? Where a planet the size of the 12th Planet is likewise aiming for the Sun but
misses because of the repulsion force, smaller comets do not have the required mass to invoke a repulsion force in the
Sun. Small comets miss because they by nature contain elements that are sensitive to the solar wind, and can no more
come close to the Sun than can mankind walk forward into the full force of a hurricane. Is this not a form of repulsion
force? It differs as the repulsion force is invoked in both parties involved in a potential collision, and the comet's
sensitivity is a drama played out only in the comet. Essentially, elements within the solar wind push the comet away,
keeping it at the distance it maintains from the Sun. Why does the solar wind not so push the Earth and other planets,
or the debris in the Asteroid Belt? It does so push, but the planets by their size resist and the debris in the Asteroid
Belt does not have the sensitivity that comets do. This is one reason, in fact, that they remain as debris and do not
become comets.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s39.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:21 AM]
ZetaTalk: Dark Ages
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Dark Ages
Note: written on Mar 15, 1996.
Coming out of the Dark Ages, man believed the Earth was flat, and that the heavens revolved around the Earth.
Evidence that contradicted these assumptions was ignored until the weight of evidence became so heavy that the
comfortable assumption was eroded. How could such a theory as the flat Earth even evolve? To man today, this theory
seems laughable, but when it evolved, the edges of the horizon always seemed at the edge of a flat plane, so this was
the newborn child's first conclusion. But did not the fact that the stars moved about the heavens in a manner that lined
up with a solar system model not move him to question? The toddler assumes the world revolves around him, and is
loath to let this go. The alternate explanation, that the heavens were dancing for his amusement, fit his mind-set. Did
not the Sun rise when he felt refreshed, and set when he was weary? All to serve his needs, he had no doubt.
Elaborate mathematical descriptions of trajectories and orbits were drawn up in an age when man had not peeked
beyond the Solar System with high powered telescopes floating above the atmosphere, and when slow motion video
was unheard of. The only complete orbits known were those of the planets which hugged the Sun, and as the math was
drawn up to fit these orbits, the orbits fit the math. The explanation for comets either fit the model or they didn't. When
they fit the model they were assumed to have the orbit, when out of view, that the model dictated. If they didn't fit the
model then they were dressed up in mathematical curves, parabolas or hyperbolas, which came close enough to let
everyone go home at the end of the day feeling smug. As concepts tend to solidify as time passes, the young taking as
absolutes what their elders preach, the Earth was now no longer flat, and the heavens no long revolved around the
Earth, but most certainly all orbits were elliptical.
When slow motion video demonstrated that trajectories do not, in fact, mirror the downward side to the upward side,
the facts did not change the precepts taught to the young. Why change a handy tool that works for everyday
applications? Close enough, and change would require reprinting all those books! The fact that the downward side of
the trajectory marries the forward thrust to the gravity drop was noted by those who think deeply about such matters,
and is a known but not extensively taught fact. For most, the Earth is still flat, as they have not been told otherwise
and are not inclined to question. Where the trajectory precept stands inviolate to most, the precepts of elliptical orbits
have even fewer challenges. Man sees the dance of stars, but there are so many variables that come into play, about
which he is uncertain at best, that the arrows of doubt seldom get launched. Yet the arrows exists.
Where orbits are snug about their center of gravity, there is little contradiction between these and what mankind calls
their laws of gravity and motion. These are not laws, of course, but elaborate descriptions of what they observe. The
flaws in the laws, however, were always present. If gravity diminishes with distance, but distance is attained with
speed, then an object in a snug elliptical orbit seems to logically be adhering to the laws of gravity and motion. Speed
up during the approach, sling past, and the speed carries the body outward where the diminishing gravity pull slows the
body down so that its curve sidewards takes predominance. The theory fit what man observed, and thus was not
questioned until his powers of observation increased. Tiny comets, seen by man in the past only when they gave their
brilliant displays while going around the Sun, have only recently been observed in great detail during this passage.
Repeating comets are not slinging past, as in a passing body. They are in orbit, doing the better part of a circle about
the Sun. Unlike the planets, whose center of gravity is just that, at the center, the comet does not behave as though the
Sun is its center of gravity. The elliptical orbit of planets is such that if one were to examine the distance from the Sun,
the difference at any given point would be slight. It is more circular than not. Comets, however, are at the other
extreme. They appear to be a fan, rather than an eye. For the laws of gravity and motion to fit, the comet must be
increasing its speed as it leaves the Sun, thus explaining its increasing distance. However, careful studies have shown
this not to be the case. The comet is going its fastest when closest to the Sun, and has slowed down when it begins to
leave what is assumed to be its gravitational master. The slowing precedes the exit, thus throwing the smug
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s61.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:22 AM]
ZetaTalk: Dark Ages
assumptions of man into consternation.
In addition, the distance comets travel outward, and the curvature of their exit are now able to be examined where in
the past they were an unknown. They go essentially straight away, not the curve anticipated. Thus the distance from
the Sun wherein they would have to complete an elliptical curve is extreme, challenging the laws of gravity and
motion. The distance where the elliptical curve would reinstate is too far, and the curve during the straight away too
slight. Rather than deal with this new information, the majority of scientists prefer their comfort factor over new
knowledge. Change is resisted, and for many the Earth is still flat.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s61.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:22 AM]
ZetaTalk: Contradictions
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Contradictions
Note: written on Mar 15, 1996.
The long elliptical orbit stands in contradiction to human trajectory theories, which have a trajectory curve downward
mirroring the trajectory curve upward. Repeating comets are going in an essentially straight line away from the Sun, a
line parallel and very close to the one that would be drawn from the very center of the Sun. Human theories of such
trajectories on Earth state that an object going in an essentially straight upward path returns from the same place,
plunging straight downward with a curvature mirroring its upward path. In contradiction to this explanation,
complacent humans find nothing strange when comets reenter the Solar System at a great distance from where they
left. The explanations given by humans for this contradiction in their logic is the Magical Ellipse explanation. The
ellipse needs no explanation, it just is. When asked to describe the forces that control an elliptical path, humans proffer
a technical description of an ellipse. They describe it, not explain it.
The long elliptical orbit stands in contradiction to human gravitational theories, which has the gravitational tug rapidly
diminishing with distance. Where the temporary orbit around the Sun has an explanation in the steady gravity tug from
the Sun, this same explanation is given for the curve they claim is instituted by the repeating comet at a great distance.
Essentially, humans refuse to even address this contradiction, falling again into the Magical Ellipse explanation. Their
response, like the cat which falls to licking itself when it is discombobulated, is to proffer greater and greater detail on
the math they use to draw or describe an ellipse.
Comets, whether termed repeating or non-repeating by humans, assume, however temporarily, an orbit around the Sun.
In this they are going the fastest when going into this curve, and are going slower when they leave off from the Sun.
This behavior stands in direct contradiction to the favorite explanation of why comets leave the Solar System
where and when they do - escape velocity, which is slower when the comet escapes than when it apparently gets
caught. This was a recently learned fact that mankind has yet to deal with. The atmosphere reduces man's ability
to see details close to the Sun, as the Sun's rays scatter in the atmosphere, creating confusion. Likewise distance,
when the comet is on the dark side of the Earth, cannot be measured accurately when the comet is pulling away.
It is the drama when comet's go round the Sun, are spanning the sky when one is looking at them during the day,
that one can measure speed. When one is measuring speed during the night, one is seeing the backside of a
comet, and measurements of speed cannot be accurately determined. It is the recent ability of probes and the
Hubble to get above the atmosphere that allows mankind a clearer picture. In particular, that time span when the
comet is changing its brief orbit to a break-away. The comet slows before it breaks away, in direct contradiction
to man's math.
Likewise perturbations by other planets do not explain why the comet leaves off where it does, and even such a
well known comet as Haley's regularly leaves off from the same spot in spite of vastly different planetary
alignments each time. Human astrophysics doesn't even attempt to address this, as it causes too much
discomfort, apparently. The favorite tactic when faced with this contradiction is to carve up the comet's path into
tiny slices, and focus just on the point where the comet leaves off, and then insert a magical and unnamed
something that perturbs the comet so that it can escape.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s60.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:22 AM]
ZetaTalk: Newton
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Newton
Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.
For a tiny object, such as a climber falling from a cliff, there is not the distance from the Earth to create a situation of
equality in the updraft and downdraft of gravity particles. Satellites are placed at a distance by your astrophysicists in
order to have them behave in accordance with Newton and sustain their distance, supposedly based on velocity? What
Newton has included in his math, without knowing, is the balance of updraft and downdraft of gravity particles. In
point of fact, if an object was not at the distance to create this balance, it either plummets to the gravitational giant or is subject to attraction by another passing or nearby gravity giant. Thus, those orbiting objects you examine are there to
be examined because of the updraft and downdraft balance. Thus Newton and his followers negated the influence of
gravity particles in his orbit equations, as all they saw seemed to fit!
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s118.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:23 AM]
ZetaTalk: Absolute Properties
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Absolute Properties
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
Absolute properties, such as the mathematical zero, a figment mathematicians use to make their formulas work, do not
exist. The absolute vacuum is a figment of physicists, struggling to make their formulas work. By this we mean that
absolute properties do not exist in the physical world. The physical world has at any given point more or less mass,
degrees, but never nothing. Absolute zero, the theoretic temperature where all molecular motion stops, also never
happens. In all this neither the mathematicians or physicists are correct, and any formulas that require such factors are
inherently incorrect.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s18.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:24 AM]
ZetaTalk: Mathematical Proofs
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Mathematical Proofs
Note: written on Feb 15, 1996.
Humans have a catchy phrase regarding relationships - which came first, the chicken or the egg? Well, of course it was
the chicken, who gradually evolved to encase young in a shell long before it evolved to become a chicken. First came
dropping the young into a water bed, as fish and frogs do, so the chicken's precursor came first. Humans treat
mathematics much this way, expecting the world to line up with their math when the math evolved to describe their
world. Starting with simple counting schemes, mathematical descriptions became more and more elaborate as they
were endlessly adjusted until they described yet another aspect of nature. When math is used as a tool, and its origins
understood, then when a particular model placed upon a natural phenomena does not fit there is no conflict. The
mathematical model is understood to be the problem. However, just as there is confusion about the chicken or the egg,
most humans lose sight of what came first. They insist the math is sacred, and stubbornly refuse to deal with the
discrepancies this approach produces.
Mathematics, for some, has become a religion.
Mathematics builds upon itself, so that concepts put into place are continued and never discarded. Formulas that
reasonably describe a situation when measurements are crude are never discarded, but are held up as standards to be
disproved and defended. Creativity in math is nil, so that brilliant insights such as Einstein’s are held to ridicule rather
than discussed. Thus it is that mathematics are burdened with the absurd as well as the insightful, and thus regularly
miss the mark. The Zetas are frequently asked what is wrong with human math, or how to do it right. Frankly, the right math will not be discussed, as this might put mankind on paths they are not yet to trod. As to what is wrong, we would
suggest a simple exercise. Face problems with a completely fresh mind, and ploy the math you think would solve that.
Compare what you have placed on paper with the traditional math. What differs? What about the traditional math
forced it into the tradition? We predict you will find that a long history of being passed forward, regardless of worth,
has placed certain formulas into mankind's mathematical view of the world. Would you allow yourself to be treated as
the doctors of yore treated patients, by bleeding and starving or opening the head? Are women in labor to die
screaming rather than undergo cesarean? Are doctor's not to wash their hands because infection spontaneously
generates and germs do not exist?
Mathematical proofs are not "proof". Mathematical proofs only demonstrate that the numbers resulting can be lined up with each other. In fact, this can be assured if one just ensures that the component pieces, in the formulas, are all from
the same grab bag. In other words, if one is building a toy city with lego building blocks, one can get everything to
line up if all the lego blocks are of a similar size or multiples of this size. To make this all line up, just throw out
anything that doesn't fit. This is, in fact, what humans do with their mathematical "proofs". When something doesn't fit, they substitute another lego piece, one from the proper grab bag, and then get smug. They haven't proved anything.
They've only gotten their math to line up, and they're not so good at that either. Contradictions are running side by side at the major universities, with the students asked not to question so the professors can continue to be smug. Just pay
your tuition and shut up.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s54.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:24 AM]
ZetaTalk: Vectors
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Vectors
Note: written on Jul 15, 1996.
Humans place too much importance in what they call velocity vectors, which are only a mathematical representation.
The motion of asteroids or comets or planets is there for a reason. It is not, as humans frequently assume, because the
motion was set in place for some reason long ago and things just follow. The motion does not rule! The motion is a
result, not a primary force. Humans treat motion as though it stood alone, outside of all other factors. What caused the
motion? All motion is a result, from the acorn dropping from a tree, or the wind swaying branches as air masses move
to equalize, to the motion of the planets in their orbits.
The breeze that bows a young sapling over a bit will not keep that sapling bent when the breeze stops blowing. Just so,
an object may even be stopped in its course, but only for a moment. Then on it comes, impelled by the same factors
that impelled it in the first place, as its motion was determined by the gravity pull of objects nearby, and those objects have not moved! An object will be motionless in space for one of two reasons. An object in the absence of gravity
from outside influences has no reason to move at all, and is still only because there is no call to do otherwise. It does
not have inertia, or a reluctance to move. Objects have inertia when they are caught in the grip of a gravity influence,
and most often in the grip of several gravity influences. Therefore, when undertaking the study of motion, limiting the
examination to the object and its speed is only effective when all other factors hold steady.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s76.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:25 AM]
ZetaTalk: Quantum Mechanics
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Quantum Mechanics
Note: written on Aug 15, 1996.
Hand in hand with the realization that atoms were formed of particles of different natures - subatomic particles - came
the science of quantum mechanics. Matter was weighed and measured, the electrical flow calculated, the degree of
intrusion required to cause atoms bound to one another to break apart noted, and all this went into quantum mechanics,
a worthy science. What interferes with the data going into the formulas is mankind's lack of knowledge in general
about subatomic particles and the many types of what they would call energy waves that exist. If one were asked to
compute the amount of water required to turn a water wheel at such a speed and for such a duration, but were not told
that the temperature on occasion would be below freezing or that at other times the water would flood and reverse the
direction of water flow - the computations would invariably be wrong.
Quantum mechanics balances out what it does not know with careful observation, so the formulas are the result of
observed facts and behavior, not theory. In this regard they are accurate, but where the science begins to go amuck is
in the theoretical aspect, where data tied to observed facts is expected to take second place to theories - the facts to
follow the theory. Our advice is to stick to observing, as at least that way you were getting someplace.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s78.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:25 AM]
ZetaTalk: Spin
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Spin
Note: written on Jan 15, 1997.
Spin is a phenomenon that occurs regularly in nature and is frequently observed on Earth, from the large swirls that
hurricanes form to the small tornadoes in the middle of water going down the drain. The fact that such a spin moves in
different directions when it is above or below the equator gives evidence that spin is affected by factors outside of
itself. The phenomenon of spin is observable when the object in motion is not constrained. Air and water are fluid, but
spinning tops or figure skaters on ice also demonstrate the phenomena. The theoretical speed of a spin is fastest toward
the center of the spinning object, a factor easily noted by comparing hurricane wind speeds with those at the center of
tornadoes. But why the difference?
Spin on the surface of the Earth reflects what is occurring in the core of the Earth. If the Earth were not rotating, its
core moving to escape or pull toward other matter in the Solar System and beyond, then spin would be affected only
by the various attractions or repulsion the spinning object itself has to its immediate neighborhood. All objects on the
face of the Earth have these same influences from the core of the Earth, but this is not evident due to lack of fluidity or
lack of motion. Spin in an object develops slowly, and is only evident to man when accumulated. Thus, water in a
water fall has spin, but the water at the bottom of the fall cannot affect the water at the top, so the spin is not
compounded. Water in a drain compounds the spin at the top by affecting the path of least resistance for the water at
the top of the drain, and thus the little tornadoes in draining water.
Spin occurs faster when the spinning object is narrow as there are fewer factors to counter the spin. A large air mass
such as is moving during a hurricane is spread out over a larger area of the core of the Earth, and thus the impetus to
move with the core is countered by the fact that one of the outer edges, the one on the pole side, is lined up over core
parts that are moving slower than the other outer edge, the one on the equator side. Thus small tops can spin faster for
the given impetus than large tops, and figure skaters find they can spin faster by reducing their overall size by drawing
their arms in and hugging themselves.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s86.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:26 AM]
ZetaTalk: Statistical Analysis
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Statistical Analysis
Note: written on Jan 15, 1996.
Humans have a saying, that one can lie with statistics, because numbers can be manipulated to support any argument.
If one wants to demonstrate that the populace is not starving, one adjusts the threshold where starvation sets in. If the
numbers run up on one group don't look so good, pick another group. If the average is too low or high, go for the
median and arrange to discard the high or low end. Statistics, done honestly, can make a statement like no other, but
done dishonestly are deeply deceptive because the readership believes the numbers have been run up honestly.
In an era of increasing distress, governments want the statistics on the homeless, the unemployed, and the uninsured to
appear healthy. Likewise, corporations wishing to lie to consumers or to their stockholders discard the unpleasant from
the computation and hope no one looks too closely. However, they are likewise being increasingly challenged. What
was included? How did you arrive at these figures? The squeeze is on. An easy out in these circumstances is to make
the formulas more complicated. Then the common man can't understand and the factors can be argued endlessly. One
trick is to factor in a null, a zero, as a theoretical possibility, when no such possibility in fact exists. Another trick is to
hop through the data in intervals, taking a summation of spot testing, rather than a summation of all the data. If
hopping through the data with one interval doesn't give the desired results, try another interval. All in a day's work for
the dishonest statistical analyst.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s52.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:28 AM]
ZetaTalk: Time Travel
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Time Travel
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
Time travel is a mystery we cannot explain fully to you. This is not dependent on our wishes, or your desire, but on the
rules we must follow. These rules are above the Council of Worlds. These rules are not negotiable. However, we can
give you some sense of what is going on. Beyond this, there is not much we can say until you reach 4th Density.
Time is linear only in your mind. It is not what it seems. Your sense that time is linear in the Universe is supported by
what you observe: clocks running in seeming syncronicity; planetary movements that are predictable; testimony of
other people you interact with to the effect that they, too, observe the same time passage as you do. However, time is
only a factor, and as such when put into mathematical calculations can be affected along with the other factors. The
Universe is such a huge mathematical calculation. In the portion of the world that you live in, the factors are stable
enough that the time factor never varies enough to be noticed. This makes you think that time is a fixed factor. It is not
fixed. We understand what other factors are involved, and how to modify them so that the time factor changes as we
wish.
The issue of time travel is confusing to humans, who see the movies where parties go into the future as well as the
past. Would that not be the case, as if one can go in one direction, why not the other? One cannot travel into the future,
except in small increments, hours at most. Leaping into the future is a fiction. One can travel into the past, as that is a
trail marked in the substance of the Universe, strands that can be unwoven and rewoven, a rope that stretches back
endlessly. The past has markers. Grip points. It has been built, where the future has not yet been built. A phrase much
in use is the Time/Space Continuum. This is simply a way of stating that matter may be in a different place, or space,
depending on the time, and that matter leaves a trail, or continuum, over time. You can equate the Time/Space
Continuum to our term strands, being woven and unwoven, which we consider more exact as it refers to the webbing
that takes place.
What would happen if one went back along a particular strand, unraveling it, and changed the circumstances
surrounding the strand. Would it change the present, and thus the future? Yes, but not to the degree depicted in the
movies, where people wink out like lights and buildings disappear from sight and even from the memory of all. How
could it, as each of these occurrences is composed of numerous strands, weaving in multiple directions, and it is
impossible to change them all. What in fact occurs, should one be allowed to go back in time and make an alteration,
is that the future is essentially unchanged. We say essentially, as there has been change, but due to the interweaving of
other strands, this is muted. The Council of Worlds strictly administers time travel, as should one go back in time and
really work at it, changes would begin to appear.
An example might be a child, born with a genetic defect. Should one go into the strands leading to conception, and
change the DNA strands affecting the defect, the child would be born whole. However, each second that ticks past the
moment of conception complicates this, as the webbing of strands has begun. At three months the fetus has strands of
interplay with the mother's host womb, her blood and DNA makeup, such that simply changing the makeup of the
genetics of the fetus is not enough. A panoply has been set in motion, and defectiveness to some degree will still
present at birth. At three months, to effect a cure, one must also delve into the strands that weave into the mother's
system, the womb, even out into the environs surrounding mother and child. It's all quite complicated. So if this is the
case, why would the Council of Worlds bother to watchdog time travel? Where changes are subtle, they can effect the
overall when done systematically. As intense as agendas are, masters over minions could set them about a never
ending routine that would affect what has been written, trip the balance enough to be worthwhile to the master.
Is not one moment another's future and yet another's past? If we today travel back, would we not be deemed visitors
from the future? And in this context, if the Earth were to hypothetically receive visitors claiming to be from the future,
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s02.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:28 AM]
ZetaTalk: Time Travel
would that not mean that we are not the present at all, and that the future, for us, has therefore been written? This
confusion can be settled if one understands that the Earth is not having visitors from the future, no matter how this
may have been stated. Misunderstandings occur during genuine channeling sessions, and an example of what will be
more prevalent in the future can be misunderstood to be an actual visitor from the future. The future has not been
written. You are writing it now, moment by moment, decision by decision. When travel back through time occurs this
is not recorded in the memory of nonparticipants, only in the memory of the travelers. Pains are taken to ensure that
this be so. Travel back in time is done for such matters as capturing genetic material long lost, for instance, not to
distort or pollute a memory.
Future travel is done only to coordinate activities of contactees and ourselves, where one has to be, as you say, in two
places at once. This is not done casually, and in all cases for the procedure to be applied to a particular contactee or
alien visiting Earth, the Council of Worlds must give its approval. This means that one contactee must experience
missing time, but another may be jumped forward in time for a conference and then returned. Their subconscious
records the memory as lineal, a fuller day. This is done on a person by person basis, so that for some countactees,
involved in what is deemed crucial activities having a great impact on the Transformation, permission is granted. The
same logic applies to ourselves, who are held under stricter rules. There are no Zetas in the Service-to-Others, in your
Solar System, who currently are allowed to be in two places at once by inching forward in time. How is this future step
done? The strands, in their current momentum and direction, are accelerated for that individual contactee, and then
unwoven again. The entity, who is not affected by this weaving and unweaving, remembers, and speaks to the
subconscious later, building a memory of the encounter.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s02.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:28 AM]
ZetaTalk: Time Flow
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Time Flow
Note: written on May 15, 1998.
As we have stated, time is but a factor in our equations, which allow us to travel back in time, when permission is
granted on rare occasions and for good cause, and travel forward on even rarer occasions. The motion and placement
of objects, sub-atomic or otherwise, are predictable, given their placement and motion and composition at any given
point. Likewise, just as you can back-engineer technology, just so we can reverse-engineer objects, their atomic
structure, and their motion and placement a moment ago. Time travel involves reversing or accelerating activity that is
predictable. This reversing or accelerating involves forcing the issue, as under normal circumstances objects proceed
based on their surroundings, your familiar world.
Factors, ingredients that we are aware of but you are unaware of, are involved in the forward progression in time, and
a lack of these ingredients results in a backsliding in time, as though falling into a vacuum. The forward press or
falling backward is due to direction of flow, of what is just another element in your Universe. You are unaware of this
element, as the steady forward progression is something you consider a given. Nothing is by chance, and no motion is
without reason or cause. To you, in your perception, time is steady in its progression, but when the press of this
ingredient is stopped, or diminished, what had occurred telescopes back in activity that is the reverse of what just
occurred.
The grip points we refer to are places in the orderly arrangement of particles where we can, in essence, set our sights
and target, and stop during a time travel, else the unraveling of what has occurred would continue unabated. One does
not start on a journey without brakes! Grip points are predictable points where particles are structured in a particular
pattern, and we aim for this pattern. This could be equated to so many ticks of the clock, or so many clangs of the hour
bell, as the periodicy is predictable and reliable, like clockwork. All these matters are outside of the world you
understand, but are as much a part of our science as working with solids and liquids and vapors are to you. Our young
experiment briefly with these matters in school, in preparation for the day they may be required to use time travel, be
called upon to set this in motion.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s97.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:29 AM]
ZetaTalk: Interstellar Travel
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Interstellar Travel
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
Most certainly we have interstellar ships, else how would we, as incarnated entities, arrive? The means of travel is not
what humans assume, propulsion. Humans use propulsion, as in sailing vessels propelled by the wind in the sails, or as
in planes propelled by air sliced and pressed backwards over specially shaped and rapidly rotating propellers and then
over specially shaped wings designed to give the plane lift, or as in jet planes propelled skyward by the continuous
explosion occurring in the jet engines, or most recently by the virtual firecrackers that propel the astronauts into space,
holding their breath all the way, brave souls that they are. As humans can only move by a snails pace unless they are
propelled, they assume that interstellar travel is by propulsion. It is not, it is by attraction, and a quick kiss it is.
We have explained how we move from one density to another, by making a reservation in the density we wish to
move to, and then simply making the move. Likewise, when making long distance travel, we make a similar
reservation, and then simply move. How does this work, in a manner that the limited intelligence of humankind can
grasp? We have spoken of the mutual attraction and repulsion of matter, which is, of course, what causes the planets
and moons to go into orbit around each other and their suns. Normally this goes into balance, not by accident but by a
series of maneuvers until the attraction and repulsion are equally strong, one not affecting the regularity of motion
more than the other. Balance is assumed when the motion takes on a regularity. Imagine what would happen if the
repulsion were eliminated, in a given interchange, and the attraction had no counterbalance? How fast is fast?
Should we be asked to explain, in formulas that humans could potentially understand, how repulsion could be
eliminated so that attraction is the only force in effect - we cannot. This is not to evade scrutiny, but to prevent humans
from getting about in the Universe in their present spiritually immature state. In 4th Density there are rules in force
that allow you to have this knowledge, and use it, while abiding by the rules. In 3rd Density you are allowed to mess
around without rules, guided only by your free will. This is why entities of higher densities cannot interfere with you,
unless you give The Call. Your world is essentially a play pen. Children are not allowed into the computer room, nor
into the Air Traffic Control tower. We trust you will understand, though we expect you will be resentful.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s15.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:29 AM]
ZetaTalk: Hover
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Hover
Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.
How do we hover, in our spacecraft, without whirling blades or blasting jets? How do we negate the downdraft of
gravity particles toward the surface of the planet we are hovering upon, while at the same time negating the upblast of
gravity particles which would send us upward in a wink unless also countered? We control both directional flows,
creating a gravity barrier around the ship. Likewise space travel, our irresistible kiss, creates a tube through space
composed of this same barrier. Gravity particles exist in the space within this barrier or tube, but only create their own
gravity dance among themselves - not enough time or quantity to coalesce a gravitational giant. And what is this
barrier? It is composed of gravity particles themselves, glued with an overabundance of another particle it does interact with, unlike the majority of sub-atomic particles which interact with gravity particles only in a mechanical manner.
Does this not produce a situation where the space or tube might become permanent? There is a time factor, such that
we must continually reproduce a space for our craft to hover, and quickly use the tube arranged for instant space travel.
The barrier degrades, in a wink, equalizing into the surrounding area where it was gathered to be the glue. You can
equate this to your use of electricity, where it dissipates quickly into becoming electrons behaving normally in the
surrounding matter as soon as interference by man in making them stream ceases.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s116.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:30 AM]
ZetaTalk: Super Conductors
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Super Conductors
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
Are we aware of super conducting material that can operate at room temperature? Of course, but it would do mankind
little good as the materials exist on worlds not compatible with Earth. The substances would either not remain in a
pure state here, or explode or rapidly burn, or poison the Earth when they escaped their bounds as they inevitably
would. The answer to mankind's energy needs do not lie in superconductors, however seductive they may be. There are
energy sources known to your government, developed and operational, which dwarf by their operation the goal of
super conductor developers. There is no need. The problems that should be addressed lie not in science but in politics
and the corporate decisions that force archaic energy sources to continue. We are speaking here of coal, oil, natural
gas, and nuclear energy. This is the issue that should be addressed!
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s20.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:31 AM]
ZetaTalk: Crystals
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Crystals
Note: written on Sep 15, 1995.
Crystals do have what humans would call magical properties, as they don't know how else to explain the results.
Crystals capture and focus energies that mankind is not aware of as yet. These energies cannot be seen and measured,
yet their presence leaves its mark. Like most myth makers, crystals have given life to stories that bear no relationship
to the truth. It has been reported that crystals can prevent disease, grow sturdier plants, and affect the passage of time.
Only the latter is true, but this cannot be put to any practical use. Not all crystals have this effect, and a certain size
must be attained before any effect at all occurs. A synergy is in process.
It has been reputed that the lost city of Atlantis used large crystals, and that such a crystal lying under the waves in the
Bermuda Triangle is causing havoc. None of this is true. Crystals of any size or shape or of whatever nature are not
having any significant effect on mankind or on the Earth at the present time, and any reports to the contrary are false.
Crystals have at times been used as a communication booster by various alien groups, but for no other reason. These
crystals, left on the surface of Mars or the Moon or even here and there on Earth, are not being activated at the current
time and thus have no more influence on their surroundings than other inanimate objects. These crystals are immense,
as large as a pick-up truck, and flawless. Humans are incapable of building them, and should they uncover one on
Earth would be incapable of activating it. This would be a toy the Council of Worlds would not allow to be placed in
the hands of 3rd Density entities. The rules do not allow it.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s33.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:31 AM]
ZetaTalk: Cold Fusion
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Cold Fusion
Note: written on May 15, 1996.
Cold fusion is a myth, the dream of those who would have endless cheap energy readily available. Energy is released
from fusion or fission, but in both cases this is a barely controlled explosion. Nuclear bombs are the extremes that man
is aware of, and when trying to harness this energy they sit on the virtual nuclear bombs called nuclear power stations,
tinkering with the controls. How would it be that cold fusion would be possible, among the molecular components on
Earth, yet not already fused? What is to stop the process? Are the molecules waiting for the signal from eager
scientists? Fusion happens under great compression, not on the benign surface of the Earth, and anyone asserting
otherwise in only looking to fuse hard cash to his wallet.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s68.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:32 AM]
ZetaTalk: Newman's Machine
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Newman's Machine
Note: written on Jun 15, 1999.
This is not what it seems, but is a measure of some other reactions which are being interpreted as free energy. Man
does not understand the atom, or atomic interactions, well enough to interpret correctly. If one did not understand fruit,
that fruits contain juice, but that this juice is finite, then a juicer would seem like a magical generation of fruit juice!
Put in this round ball, press the lever, and out it comes! This may seem overly simplistic, but a quick glance back into
man's past will show that concepts that are taught, today, to children in grade school were not known to adults just a
few hundred years or so ago. How disease caused by germs is spread, so that epidemics could be prevented rather than
suffered or considered a curse. That the Earth revolves around the Sun, not that the Sun is moving about the Earth.
That the Earth is not flat, but round, and could be sailed around. How recessive genes can express, so that the
occasional blue eyed child from brown eyed family lines was not magic at all. All these were concepts unknown to
man in the past.
So Newman, in the construction of his machine, is pulling electricity from the surrounding area, but this would occur
on a depreciating manner, less and less over time as the surroundings are being depleted. Thus, this is no more than a
curiosity, not a solution to energy needs.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s99.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:33 AM]
ZetaTalk: Element 115
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Element 115
Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.
Regarding element 115. This is an accurate story, told by an individual who was disheartened by what he saw while
working for the United States government. He survived, against the precepts he was employed under, but not without
injury. In the end, those who would silence him have learned to use his rebellion. Secrets lie heavy on the hearts of
those who must maintain them. Element 115 is only one of the elements available to use, which you are unfamiliar
with. Earth does not naturally have an element that equates to Element 115, nor do other worlds. This is a
manufactured element, and about this process we can say no more. As with the discussion of time manipulation, this
discussion could not go much further under the rules we are bound to follow.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s03.htm[2/5/2012 11:55:33 AM]
Document Outline
zetatalk2.com
ZetaTalk: Science
ZetaTalk: Universe
ZetaTalk: Big Bang
ZetaTalk: Follows After
ZetaTalk: Black Holes
ZetaTalk: Turnabout
ZetaTalk: Dark Matter
ZetaTalk: Space/Time Curves
ZetaTalk: Gravity
ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices
ZetaTalk: Repulsion Force
ZetaTalk: Suns
ZetaTalk: Solar Atmosphere
ZetaTalk: Binary Suns
ZetaTalk: Solar Flares
ZetaTalk: X-Rays
ZetaTalk: Star Birth
ZetaTalk: Atmosphere Building
ZetaTalk: Sonic Booms
ZetaTalk: Rotation
ZetaTalk: Tides
ZetaTalk: Auroras
ZetaTalk: Planetary Magnetism
ZetaTalk: Gaseous Planets
ZetaTalk: Opposition
ZetaTalk: Earthquake Predictions
ZetaTalk: EQ Clouds
ZetaTalk: Tunguska Explosion
ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids
ZetaTalk: Light Particles
ZetaTalk: Light Particle Bonds
ZetaTalk: Red Shift
ZetaTalk: Gravity Particles
ZetaTalk: Gravity Flow
ZetaTalk: Galaxies
ZetaTalk: Particle Flow
ZetaTalk: Energy Waves
ZetaTalk: Ball Lightning
ZetaTalk: Ice Formation
ZetaTalk: Explosions
ZetaTalk: Subatomic Particles
ZetaTalk: Unified Theory
ZetaTalk: by Human Hand
ZetaTalk: Ferromagnetism
ZetaTalk: Water Cradle
ZetaTalk: Sentience
ZetaTalk: Early Man
ZetaTalk: DNA Building Blocks
ZetaTalk: Biorhythms
ZetaTalk: Aging Process
ZetaTalk: Auto-Immune Diseases
ZetaTalk: Spontaneous Human Combustion
ZetaTalk: Dinosaur Extinction
ZetaTalk: Dolphin Talk
ZetaTalk: Worldwide Infertility
ZetaTalk: Mind/Body Connection
ZetaTalk: Brain Waves
ZetaTalk: Coma
ZetaTalk: Brain Capacity
ZetaTalk: EQ
ZetaTalk: Telekinesis
ZetaTalk: 12th Planet
ZetaTalk: Magnetic Field
ZetaTalk: Gravity Field
ZetaTalk: Equilibrium
ZetaTalk: Status Quo
ZetaTalk: Resonance
ZetaTalk: Orbit Perturbations
ZetaTalk: Booms
ZetaTalk: Flashes
ZetaTalk: Pole Reversals
ZetaTalk: Rotation Reversals
ZetaTalk: Shift Threshold
ZetaTalk: Weakest Link
ZetaTalk: Close Pass
ZetaTalk: Magnetic/Geographic
ZetaTalk: Wandering Poles
ZetaTalk: Chance of Collision
ZetaTalk: Rotation/Orbit
ZetaTalk: Asteroid Belt
ZetaTalk: Near Earth Asteroids
ZetaTalk: Continental Drift
ZetaTalk: Meteors
ZetaTalk: African Coapies
ZetaTalk: Earth Twin
ZetaTalk: Oil Deposits
ZetaTalk: Planet X
ZetaTalk: Comet Orbit
ZetaTalk: Sling Orbit
ZetaTalk: Second Foci
ZetaTalk: Distance from Earth
ZetaTalk: Retrograde Orbit
ZetaTalk: Entry Angle
ZetaTalk: Conflict
ZetaTalk: Speed
ZetaTalk: Slowing Influences
ZetaTalk: Esape Velocity
ZetaTalk: Second Pass
ZetaTalk: 12th Planet Glow
ZetaTalk: Brown Dwarf
ZetaTalk: Red Planet
ZetaTalk: Swirling Moons
ZetaTalk: Surging Magma
Magma Suring Switch, Zetas Explain
ZetaTalk: 3rd Magnet
ZetaTalk: S. Pole Tug
ZetaTalk: Stage Set
ZetaTalk: Dust Cloud Arrival
ZetaTalk: Charged Dust Cloud
ZetaTalk: Sacred Orbits
ZetaTalk: Light Illusion
ZetaTalk: Point of Passage
ZetaTalk: Float Past the Sun
ZetaTalk: Precursor Drift
ZetaTalk: What Magnets Do
ZetaTalk: Dance of the Moons
ZetaTalk: Second Sunlight
ZetaTalk: Whither the Earth?
ZetaTalk: Dancing Partners
ZetaTalk: Comets Come Early
ZetaTalk: Constellation View
ZetaTalk: Jupiter's Blue Ring
ZetaTalk: Hazelwood Killer
ZetaTalk: Newton's Clock
ZetaTalk: Dark Twin
ZetaTalk: Whiplash
ZetaTalk: Dark Twin Visibility
ZetaTalk: Dark Twin Looms
ZetaTalk: Shrouded Monster
ZetaTalk: Photographic Proof
ZetaTalk: Big Squeeze
ZetaTalk: Waiting to Exhale
ZetaTalk: Plowing Ahead
ZetaTalk: a Twirling Wobble
ZetaTalk: 23 is the Key!
ZetaTalk: Rings of Planet X
ZetaTalk: Eye of the Storm
ZetaTalk: Lull in the Eye
ZetaTalk: Dark Meaning of Sedna
ZetaTalk: Jerking Nancy Around
ZetaTalk: June 8 Transit
ZetaTalk: Bait and Switch
ZetaTalk: Venus and Mars
ZetaTalk: Venus, Playing Chicken
ZetaTalk: Magma Voids
ZetaTalk: Storm Clash
ZetaTalk: Bigger and Closer
ZetaTalk: Beneath the Dust
ZetaTalk: Simulating the Seasons
ZetaTalk: Solstice
ZetaTalk: Intermittent Lurch
ZetaTalk: IERS Flatlined
ZetaTalk: Light Towers
ZetaTalk: Planets
ZetaTalk: Orbits
ZetaTalk: Elliptical Orbits
ZetaTalk: Slowing Probes
ZetaTalk: Orbital Plane
ZetaTalk: Binary Orbits
ZetaTalk: Planet Revolutions
ZetaTalk: Perturbations
ZetaTalk: Centrifugal Force
ZetaTalk: Satellite Orbits
ZetaTalk: Trajectories
ZetaTalk: Oort Cloud
ZetaTalk: Repeating Comets
ZetaTalk: Ephemeris
ZetaTalk: Dark Ages
ZetaTalk: Contradictions
ZetaTalk: Newton
ZetaTalk: Absolute Properties
ZetaTalk: Mathematical Proofs
ZetaTalk: Vectors
ZetaTalk: Quantum Mechanics
ZetaTalk: Spin
ZetaTalk: Statistical Analysis
ZetaTalk: Time Travel
ZetaTalk: Time Flow
ZetaTalk: Interstellar Travel
ZetaTalk: Hover
ZetaTalk: Super Conductors
ZetaTalk: Crystals
ZetaTalk: Cold Fusion
ZetaTalk: Newman's Machine
ZetaTalk: Element 115
ТЕЛЕГРАМКанал с обзорами, анонсами новинок и книжными подборками
Книжный Вестник
Бот для удобного поиска книг (если не нашлось на сайте)
Поиск книг
Свежие любовные романы в удобных форматах
Любовные романы
О психологии, саморазвитии и личностном росте
Саморазвитие
Детективы и триллеры, все новинки
Детективы
Фантастика и фэнтези, все новинки
Фантастика
Отборные классические книги
Классика
ВКОНТАКТЕБиблиотека с любовными романами, которая наверняка придётся по вкусу женской части аудитории
Любовные романы
Библиотека с фантастикой и фэнтези, а также смежных жанров
Фантастика
Самые популярные книги в формате фб2
Топ фб2
книги