ZetaTalk: Science - читать бесплатно онлайн полную версию книги автора Nancy Lieder (ч. 2)

They announce to their buddies that they have been lucky, in their sexual escapades, but privately anguish about their

chances of fathering a child. Worldwide, the frowns are beginning to appear on male faces, and nervous discussion is

starting in the women's circles.

This is not a matter discussed broadly in the media, as it is given Back Page Coverage if any coverage at all. The reason for this hushed tone relates to the cause of the problem, for those who publish are golfing and breakfasting with

the perpetrators of the problem, so all is kept quiet. For many decades several major industries dealt in what they knew

to be poisons. We are speaking here of PCBs and their derivatives and their relatives. This was economical. The rich

stayed away from the poisons, and thought themselves well rid of it, but a horror they never imagined occurred - the

poisons escaped into the atmosphere, the waters, the soil, in short went everywhere. Now even the wealthy find their

fertility dropping, but ease this pain by resorting to artificial insemination and adoption. What they seek to avoid at this

point are repercussions, and thus the results of scientific studies are silenced, repeatedly.

The cause of the infertility is a sequence well understood - the poisons mock female hormones and thus simply

confuse the ingestor, who drinks them daily in his water, eats them daily in his food, and is even breathing them with

every breath. Can the establishment cleanse the world, and undo their damage? No. What filter does man possess that

could wash a poison out of the ocean, or suck a poison out of the winds, or refresh every farmer's field, worldwide?

An antidote is required, and none is in sight.

As long as this situation exists, the matter will be kept hush-hush. Meanwhile, the problem worsens, and threatens to

shock a world long concerned with a massive over-population problem. The threshold where a male can no longer

impregnate his lady, no matter how valiantly he tries, is about to arrive. And when it does, the cries of newborn babes

in hospital corridors will drop dramatically, and merchandisers selling baby supplies will find their sales suddenly

plummeting, and formerly busy schools will wonder where their enrollees went. If there is no solution at hand, the

problem will not be allowed press time even then, as those who rule the media are too close to those who would take

the blame.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s10.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:08 AM]

ZetaTalk: Mind/Body Connection

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Mind/Body Connection

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

Scientists are lately busy mapping the places in the human brain that are active during thought. This is a time honored

practice, and not far off base. When a human stares at an object the visual areas of the brain are more active than

usual, and when another is in telepathic communication with the staring human, both have the same areas of their

brains active. This has been known and recorded for decades. What is recent is the attempt to document by what

means humans think, arrive at conclusions, or have, for instance, a brilliant insight. One can map with simple animals,

trained in a maze, the learning curve whereby they learn that to follow the smooth wall, for instance, they arrive at

food. The first time this occurs it is by accident, so the rat makes an association. Smooth walls = food. The next time

the rat is put into a maze, if hungry, the rat will give more weight to exploring smooth walled paths over rough

textured routes. What's going on here?

The mental association in the rat's brain is a chemical sequence in the existing brain cells in certain areas of the brain.

Hunger in the rat is now connected to those sections of the brain which hold visual and tactile imprints. These

imprints, as well as the pathways, are chemical. These imprints, or stored data, and pathways wax strong or weak,

depending on how often they are used. More use, strengthened chemistry. Less use, debilitated chemistry. If the rat

does not continue to find food via smooth walls, it will explore these paths less and less often, until smooth walls have

no more significance for the rat than any other type of wall. These chemical pathways are not identical. They have

characteristics that relate to the area of the brain they point to, and in simple worms are somewhat transferable.

Worms, taught to head to the right or left for food or to avoid injury, can have their brains fed to other worms, who

then seem to have ingested knowledge. What's going on here? The brain chemicals, not broken down during digestion,

migrate in the blood stream to the brain, and being of similar chemical composition in similar worms, attach to the

brain pathways of the new host. The chemistry for right or left is specific in these worms, being on one side of the

brain or another with some slight differences, and where these differences weigh only slightly they weigh enough to

set the ingesting worm to favor connecting to one side of the brain or another. A transferred learned response, proving

that the brain works by chemistry, chemical paths and chemical images.

Emotions are chemistry, generated from within. Sensations, the power of the brain to retain ideas, is also intrinsically

allied with chemical reactions. In fact, it forms the base. What else would there be? Hormones stimulate feelings, and

homones are created by nervous stimulation of the glands. It is all intertwined. Senses receive light rays or heat, or

other such stimuli that create chemical reactions that travel along nerves and are then stored in your brain by chemical

changes. These chemical changes are so slow to deteriorate that you die before many of them do, which is why you

have a memory. This is a chemical store, similar to a computer databank, in which chemical changes are virtually

permanently etched in your brain.

Complex thought can be broken down into thousands of steps, where sensory memories are related. Even the abstract

concept of numbers is related to sensory memories. The child piling blocks is noting that four blocks pile higher than

three, and the concept of greater than is related to these counts. Does the one pile not loom higher? When adding just

one block onto the short pile, they are equal. An incipient algebraic equation is building in the babe's mind. Great

thoughts are built from many small mental data stores, and many more connections. Great insights are simply where

two or more formerly unrelated connections bridge, to become related. How does this bridging occur?

It is known that people think best while pacing, and that palsied children not able to crawl or walk lack some ability to

learn concepts. Bridging occurs when the chemicals needed to build a new pathway are in abundance in a certain part

of the brain. It is accidental in that the connection is only by proximity, but no accident in that the brain areas rich with

these chemicals are so active because they relate to the issue at hand. Thus the brain is just making an introduction.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s21.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:08 AM]

ZetaTalk: Mind/Body Connection

Here, you two places are both active, speak to each other. Thus, the child finding himself staring at a wall he wishes to

climb over, and seeing some boxes near at hand, recalls his pile of blocks. An a'ha occurs, as his memory of blocks

connects to this sight of the boxes, which have a similar shape. Presto. Thought.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s21.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:08 AM]

ZetaTalk: Brain Waves

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Brain Waves

Note: written on Jul 15, 1995.

The human brain is more complex than your scientists suspect. They are busily mapping where certain functions occur,

and how parts of the brain activate in syncronicity. They know that parts of the brain, near the stem, are older than, for

instance, the forebrain, and that a human can survive remarkably well with only half a brain, as long as that half is

either the right or left, intact. But what your scientists do not know is that beyond the old brain and the new, the

subconscious and the conscious, the right and the left halves - there are yet more subdivisions of the human brain.

Where it is known that the brain seems to specialize in activity that requires Beta frequency brain waves during

wakefulness, and Alpha frequency waves during sleep or meditation, and Theta waves during rage, and Delta waves in

coma - no one is quite sure why. We will tell you.

Where brain functions are localized close to the data stores, the chemical paths and links that constitute memory and

the potential for thought, these functional mother lodes cannot be mined without the greased lightning that is the

communication substrata. We are not speaking here of synaptic junctions, the ends of one brain cell's dendrites

touching another. We are speaking here not of chemistry, but of a communication method not understood by your

scientists, as it cannot be pressed between glass plates and peeked at under a microscope, or placed in a vial of

chemicals to test its nature. It requires a living brain to express itself, and beyond the difference in frequency, its nature

is unknown to your scientists.

Brain waves are but a symptom of the process, whereby the brain, as an organ, hums to itself. Think of the choir,

where all warm up with the same musical scales - synchronicity. But the true musical potential is where the choir, open

throated, strikes harmonious chords. So how does the brain hum and harmonize, and what does this have to do with

communication? This music, as we have said, is not chemical but the result of chemical interactions, which result in

what you may term a variation on electrical energy. Electrons are not the only particles involved in electrical current,

which is much over simplified in man's theories. There are hundreds of sub-atomic particles that constitute electric

current. The motion of this energy is in waves for the same reason a body of water has waves. For motion to occur at

all there is pressure and release, then bumping and reaction. And how does this assist communication? Once the choir

is humming, the voice of the soloist is complemented. She finds her note more surely when the basso is striking a

chord with her. She swells to a high note more confidently when the altos are coming behind her, to cover her gasp

when she runs out of breath. They are a team, the choir, and so are your brain's various frequencies. They all occur at

once, but are noticeable at different times because of the dominance. Listen carefully, and you will hear the full choir.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s26.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:09 AM]

ZetaTalk: Brain Waves

The brain waves you are aware of differ because they are supporting different parts of your brain. Not this spot which

when poked causes a sound to be heard, or this spot where when poked makes a finger twitch, but throughout the

brain. They are different because they serve as a communication support for entirely different processes, which we will

tell you about. The Delta waves, noticeable only during coma, are basic only to those parts of your brain which run the

body. The basic processes, like digestion, heart beat, temperature control, blood pressure, and reaction to gross stimuli

like a direct punch to the stomach or a match to the finger tip. Fish and worms have Delta, should anyone want to take

note. Theta, evident during rage, is basic to the animal's reaction to dire threats, where blind rage is the only hope and

sometimes a savior. Theta controls muscular control, focusing the resources of the body such as nutrients in the blood

to the muscles and parts of the nervous system on alert. It is more than the chemical assist that comes from adrenaline.

It directs the nervous system to forget all else, and concentrate on the fight. Poltergeist activity sometimes is related to

Theta activity, and not by accident, as the mind is mentally as well as physically throwing things in order to survive.

Alpha is the brain wave belonging to that part of your brain that deals with scope, spiritual as well as physical. It pieces

it all together, makes sense of it, or tries to, and listens to the subconscious, where the real story is always recorded.

Meditation is done in Alpha, and hypnosis, and sleep, where dreams emerge. All this deep understanding of the nature

of the world is resisted by yet another part of the brain, that supported by Beta waves, considered the brain waves of

the wakeful and alert, intelligent human. Beta supports the physical existence of humans, by processing what the

senses perceive and sharing this with the rest of the brain. Beta is grounded. It wants not to know of the deeper

meaning, of connections, or what the spirit knows, it wants only to be here and now and can't be bothered with all that

other nonsense. The Beta brain helps a creature get through the day, find enough to eat, and escape the flood or fire. It

says, in essence, no time for day dreaming now, we've got survival to worry about. That's why the Alpha brain takes

over at night, when the creature is safe, and has time for such nonsense as the riddles that the Universe presents.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s26.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:09 AM]

ZetaTalk: Coma

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Coma

Note: written on Nov 15, 1995.

Comatose patients are very distressing to doctors as there is essentially nothing to be done except wait. With an

infection the doctor can try various antibiotic or heat treatments, enrich the patient's diet, and perhaps even work on

their psychological state to boost the immune response. But except for maintenance of the human body, there is

nothing to be done for a comatose patient. Human doctors are not sure of the cause, as where coma almost invariably

sets in after a serious physical blow to the head or chemical disturbance in the body, it often lingers long after the

cause has been removed. There have been cases where a patient, ostensibly well, is comatose for years and then, one

day, just wakes up. When asked if they were aware of anything during that time, the patient draws a blank. What

causes coma, and what kind of place was the patient in while comatose?

Coma uses the same mechanism we aliens do during visitation, when we record the visit in the subconscious only. This

is a chemical block, and can lift as suddenly as it can be applied - within minutes. Due to past genetic engineering, the human body has overlapping brains, with the conscious brain the least well rooted. To use a computer analogy, the

subconscious is hardwired but the conscious is software. If the chemistry flooding the body is missing certain

components, the consciousness is deactivated just as surely as a computer without software cannot process data - lights

on, fans humming, nothing happening. The parts of the body that are hardwired continue - heartbeat, breathing, reflex

actions, digestion. During visitation, of course, the contactee is not comatose, as we adjust the body chemistry so that

the subconscious is functioning but the conscious is deactivated. Contactees do not forget their visits, as they were

never recorded in the conscious. Rather, recall builds a conscious memory from the subconscious. During coma, the

patient sometimes reaches this state, in waves, during recovery. They may be awake and even walking about and

talking, but will not remember later.

Recovery, for a comatose patient, is delayed where there is a subconscious wish to avoid the reality they must return

to. For those who doubt this we would point to fugue states, which simulate a partial coma in that the patient cannot

remember their past whatsoever. Parts of the brain are switched off, and doctors are unanimous that fugue states are

psychological. Here the patient has changed their chemistry to detach the conscious, so that when they recover from

the fugue state they have no conscious memory of where they have been. As the conscious was not on-line during the

fugue, the patient also did not have access to past memories. Of course, the subconscious memories were available,

and the patient knew full well they were avoiding certain areas so as not to dwell on the past. The subconscious deals

with what is at hand - the here and now - so in a fugue state is not a nag for the temporarily forgotten.

Truly comatose patients are less alive than those in deep sleep. They are passing time. After an injury they emerge

from this state to check out the world around them. As with a faint, the coma serves a purpose, removing the human

from a situation they can do little about. When they emerge, gradually, they may determine they do not wish to return,

and send themselves back into coma. Our advice for those wishing for the return of a loved one is to speak to them

frankly about situations that the patient may be reluctant to face. Honesty is best, as the recovering patient is on that

footing in any case. Speak freely of what the patient has to look forward to, changes in circumstances, new factors the

patient is unaware of. If the patient is not hearing all of this, his incarnated spirit is, and speaks to the re- emerging mind quite well.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s43.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:10 AM]

ZetaTalk: Brain Capacity

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Brain Capacity

Note: written on Dec 15, 1995.

It is often stated that humans only use 10% of their brain capacity. This is nonsense. If the brain evolved in response to

need, why would it then turn off and idle? Surely the world of today is more demanding of the brain than past eras, so

if anything all parts of the brain should be engaged, and they are.

Humans map the brain as best they can, documenting reactions noticed during brain surgery and capacities lost as a

result of brain damage. They thus know some of the jobs the brain performs, but are puzzled by all that gray matter that

seems to have no function. Then there are the cases of remarkable performance where the human brain seems to be

virtually absent, as in the cases where an encephalitic infant develops into an adult with apparently normal capacity.

Part of the human brain maintains the body functions, as is evident when brain stem injury occurs above the nerves to

the heart and other organs. Life stops. But these parts of the brain are older, at the base of the brain, and do not involve

the larger and newer sections of the brain to any degree. Humans are also aware that they can live quite well with only

half a brain, right or left side, as long as a complete half remains. As with many vital organs, evolution favored the

specimen who could survive the loss of one. Thus dual eyes, dual ears, dual kidneys, dual lungs, dual limbs, dual testes

and ovaries, and dual brains. While whole, they both function, and thus both halves of the brain are hard at work as

cooperative team members, communicating via the connective mass between them.

Humans are puzzled at the amount of gray matter that seemingly has no function. If a human can survive losing half a

brain, and an encephalitic can function with a minimal brain, then is not there excess brain capacity? This assumption

is based on the apparent normalcy of humans functioning with diminished brain size. The humans walk, talk, laugh at

jokes, remember to brush their teeth - apparently normal. However, as most consider it to be amazing that these

individuals are not in a coma, they seldom move past astonishment to check for full capacity. A woman with only one

ovary still ovulates every month, as each ovary has more than enough eggs, menopause occurring due to timing out

rather than exhaustion. A single lung or kidney maintains the body under normal circumstances, but under duress a

lack of capacity manifests. Just so, where diminished brain size allows the individual to learn and learn well those

routines called upon regularly, when asked to stretch the lack of capacity shows up.

Each complex concept is built from many mental building blocks, and each of these building blocks likewise is

composed of many parts. Children piece these building blocks together, bit by bit, piece by piece, and eventually get to

the point where they can structure abstract concepts. The concept of gravity is grasped in school because the babe

dropped food bits from its high chair in fascination as they plopped and bounced on the floor, and the toddler watched

birds fighting gravity with their beating wings but found that flailing arms did not create a lift, and the child built

towers and arches with building blocks and found the arch must support the weight above or else. All these concepts

built into an abstract concept of gravity.

Diminished brain capacity allows the afflicted person to laugh when others laugh as laughter is contagious, especially

when one wishes to belong. Do not small children laugh along while not understanding the joke? Diminished capacity

does not allow one to create a joke beyond the slap- stick, nor does it allow one to build an abstract concept where one has not already been constructed. Thus, the brain damaged can continue old functions where the connections and

structures have not been lost, but time stops for them where new abstractions must be constructed. Too many washed

out bridges, so the destination is never reached. Abstract concepts, intuition, long range planning, adaptability - this is what all that uncharted gray matter is supporting, and it is not idle.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s47.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:10 AM]

ZetaTalk: EQ

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: EQ

Note: written on Dec 15, 1995.

Intelligence tests have been increasingly broadened into areas with little relationship to intellect. Intellect is thought, thinking, concepts. Thought can be broken down into memory, the ability to string memories together, the ability to

abstract a concept from many concrete memories, the ability to arrive at a logical conclusion, the ability to consider

the future and plan, and the overall capacity to do much of this at the same time. Thought is not the ability to match a

tone, the ability to draw or quote by repeating what one has just seen or heard, or the capacity to be socially pleasant

and observant. Where such abilities frequently further the individual and are even taken to be signs of intelligence, this

is due more to what society expects of its members than intellectual performance. Is the little girl who is quick to

mock her mother's curtsy and phrases bright or just a copy-cat? The latter.

True deep intelligence is seldom recognized for what it is by those of lesser intelligence. The bright child seems

distracted, may forget to tie his shoes, makes mistakes when doing simple tasks, and wanders off to be by himself and

alone with his thoughts. The dull child may have nothing better to do than be a copy- cat, and as this earns him

applause, does it often. This does not mean that the bright child has less of an Emotional Quotient, an EQ as it is

called, it simply means they have better things to do. Given a situation that truly tests the ability of an individual to

empathize and discern the correct emotional appeal to make to others, the bright child will routinely do as well if not

better than the individual of average intelligence.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s46.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:11 AM]

ZetaTalk: Telekinesis

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Telekinesis

Note: written on Dec 15, 1996.

Many physical forces in nature are not visible to man. The wind swaying trees in the distance, magnetic fields

snapping magnetized objects into alignment, and even the forces of gravity are invisible to man. That man could move

objects with the force of his mental focus is only considered to be in the realm of the supernatural because it happens

rarely and not in a controlled manner which would allow scientists to study and record it. The phenomena is not a

controlled phenomena in humans, in spite of what some yogis claim. Man is not structured to allow willful telekinetic

abilities, and that they happen at all is due only to latent abilities that get briefly triggered, usually accompanied by a

burst of anger.

In 4th Density, the ability to levitate oneself or move other objects is present and is a skill that can be honed. This is a

factor of the intelligence that is either present naturally in the species available for incarnation to entities who have

graduated to 4th Density, or is genetically engineered into species who will be so incarnated. Just as telepathic thought

processes can be focused toward a target, the brain waves that enable levitation or movement of objects can also be

focused. The mechanism is not one currently understood by man, but is one of hundreds of physical forces similar to

the forces of gravity and repulsion. Essentially, a flood of these energies is focused beneath the object to be levitated, and if the object is to be moved, unevenly so. A moved object is essentially levitated slightly so that friction is

removed, and then tipped in the direction desired by slightly more levitation on one side.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s80.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:11 AM]

ZetaTalk: 12th Planet

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: 12th Planet

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The term, 12th Planet, is not scientifically exact but relates to the historical and widely read book that Sitchen wrote,

titled The 12th Planet. In this book he explains that the ancient visitors from this traveling comet considered the Moon

to be a planet, and counted the Sun as the first. The periodic Earth cataclysms caused by the 12th Planet have been in

place for eons, since the Earth was cold and without life. As this statement will raise questions in some minds, let us

explain. The Earth was cold as the Sun had not yet lit. All this is a matter of astrophysics, and not relevant to the

discussion at hand. The 12th Planet, or giant comet, assumed its orbit around the Sun due to gravitational and motion

issues, which were at play coming out of what some Earthlings refer to as the big bang. This was in fact only a little

bang, a local affair, however.

The orbit of the 12th Planet is long and narrow. This is not dependent on gravitational and orbital matters within your

Solar System, but on a larger scheme, which causes the trip back into your Solar System to be but a minor part of the

itinerary. Why does the 12th Planet swing so far away from your Solar System, and why bother to return, having done

so?

There is a balance between the attraction of your Sun and another, unseen by you but nevertheless present and in force.

The 12th Planet travels interminably between these two forces, not able to settle on an orbit around just one because of

the momentum and path it originally took. It is caught. The path of the 12th Planet is such that it spends most of its life

out in dark space, slowly moving from one giant tug to another. As it approaches one of these giants, your Sun being

one, it picks up speed, and reaches a maximum speed as it passes the attraction. Having passed, it now has double the

gravitational attraction on one side, and quickly switches back in the other direction, zooming just as rapidly much

along the path it just took. Out in space again, caught between the two giants that dominate its life, it settles down to a

sedate few thousand years, only to zip around the Sun's counterpart in a like manner and head back toward your Solar

System.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s04.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:12 AM]

ZetaTalk: Magnetic Field

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Magnetic Field

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

Where some scientists state that the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening lately, this is certainly not the case.

They misunderstand. The Earth's magnetic field is not weakening, it is changing course or direction, and thus Scattered

does not register on their instruments in the same old way. This is an early indicator of the great confusion that the

12th Planet will have on the Earth, soon, during the pole shift. Another way to describe this dispersing is the scientific

term - base resonant frequency. This is just another name for magnetic pull, the strength of the pull the Earth's core has

on instruments. Instruments, through electricity coursing through wires, create a magnetic field in a core of iron or

some other highly susceptible material. The resulting electromagnetic field can be either aligned with the Earth, or set

to cross the Earth's magnetic field, or at any partial angle that the scientists desire. Depending on the strength of the

Earth's own magnetic field, the field created by the instruments is thus disrupted or weakened. This weakening

disruption, noted by scientists, is just another indication of the dispersal of the Earth's internal magnetic field.

We have stated that the heating up of your world's oceans are related to the increased swirling about going on in the

Earth's core. Even primitive humans were intuitively aware that the Earth's core was not solid. Molten lava is a sure

clue. Even during quiescent times the liquid rock that lies under the crusted surface of the Earth moves about, just as

currents move in the oceans. The oceans are not merely influenced by temperature changes from contact with molten

lava on the ocean floor or air temperature, but also by pressure to some degree from the prevailing winds. Most

importantly, the oceans are pulled to and fro by the gravity of the Moon and other planetary bodies. Once set in

motion, water tends to keep moving for some time, high pressure areas dispersing to low pressure areas, just as in the

atmosphere. Likewise, molten rock in the Earth's core is subject to influences - gravitational, from other planetary

bodies, but also magnetic, as the composition of the molten rock contains elements such as iron prone to magnetic

influences. Currents and tides develop in the molten rock, and this is either gentle and regular or vigorous and given to

sudden spurts. The dispersing of the Earth's magnetic alignment is just another indicator of this phenomena.

Note: added during the Aug 24, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.

The Earth's magnetism is being disturbed now, when stable for thousands of years. Put upon the disruption now a core

that turns completely during the pole shift, must realign, and consider that many parts of the core will be slowly

finding their place in the mush. This equates to several decades of an erratic magnetic field, and by this time, any

groups of mankind left will have switched to other means than compasses. Magnetic diffusion is already causing

mankind to move to alternate means of establishing bearings. This has always been the case, as compass failure or

erratic magnetic switching about has occurred in the past, unexplained, so sighting on stars or manual controls are

always in place, just in case. Thus, to the man on the street, little will be said, as most of the time the field will guide compasses, and when not, it will be passed off as one of those erratic times, or a compass failure. Thus, you will find

until the weeks when all are staring at the sky, pointing, that no mention of extremes in magnetic changes will be

made. By then, no one will care.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s05.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:12 AM]

ZetaTalk: Gravity Field

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Gravity Field

Note: written during the August 3, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC session. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Mankind, in his dealings with gravity, assumes a steady force from a given mass. His math lines up accordingly, with

a larger mass having a greater pull, and his explorations off the face of Earth has not challenged this. In the last few

years, he has found his probes not behaving according to gravity math, without explanation. And Recently, his probes have given him data to the effect that the shape of the Earth should have changed, per the gravity pull registered from

the surface, but measurements do not support this shape change. What has occurred, to change the pull of gravity from

the Earth to the extent that it is measurable from space? Mankind's theories include changes in the core, as they cannot

see any ostensible change in the shape of the globe. As we have stated, gravity is a particle flow, with outshooting in a

laser manner of intense gravity particle streams and a slow drifting back to the surface by the particles. It is the drifting

back that creates the phenomenon of gravity, pressure downward, as the outburst goes between atoms and thus does

not interact.

Planet X is approaching from a point only somewhat below the ecliptic, at this time, a gravity pull we have described

as disturbing the equilibrium. Man looks about him and makes assumptions on the status quo, and when the status quo

changes he is shocked and cannot explain the changes. He does not understand the status quo, his explanations wrong, but when we tell him that the equilibrium has been disturbed, as an explanation, he argues. This is the case here, the

flow of gravity particles normally involved with the Sun and other planets being considered normal by man, and now,

an additional pull from the direction of the Ecliptic causing gravity particles to move in that direction, return from that direction, being noticeable.

How is it that the other planets, such as Jupiter, do not cause such a leaning of gravity pull? Jupiter is estimated to

have X mass, based on perturbations when it passes other planets, or is nearby. Mankind assumes this is entirely due to

gravity, understanding only a fraction of a percentage the influences that planets have on one another. There are

numerous particle flows, and depending upon the composition of a given planet, it will repulse, attract, or care not.

Mars is tiny, the gaseous planets not massive enough, and the Sun the only element outside of the Earth itself to affect

the even flow of gravity. The Sun likewise, with its outbursting matter, counteracts any excessive pull of gravity

particles, in the manner that solar wind affects comet tails. Is Planet X that massive, that strong in its pull, that from a

position outside the orbit of Pluto it could cause a change in gravity particle flow in the Earth? Yes, in a similar

manner to magnetism flow, where magnetic fields are far outside what mankind imagines, in their reach. This gravity

change, recently noted, will not be the last evidence that the monster is on the move, and will soon create havoc on

your peaceful planet.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s127.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:13 AM]

ZetaTalk: Equilibrium

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Equilibrium

Note: written on Dec 15, 2000. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

If the 12th Planet is riding at the mid-point of its long and narrow orbit, during most of its slow motion between the

Sun and the Sun’s dead twin, then how it that it can have an effect on the planets and moons in the solar system when

it is only moving slowly from that virtual standstill? The outer planets were discovered only because slight

perturbations in the known planets were observed and analyzed to point to another body in motion, farther out. But

these perturbations were extreme, in comparison to an inbound object on a virtual straight line path, as their path of

these outer planets were from side to side, thus causing a more noticeable motion in the perturbed bodies. Other than

perturbing toward Orion, the direction of the inbound 12th Planet, by all the planets in the solar system, there is little

steady evidence that the 12th Planet exists. But as it begins its passage, in the few short years prior to its passage,

palpable changes are evident. The Earth’s core is heating up, the plates giggling into a lock so that quakes in one

ricochet into the neighboring plate, and volcanic activity increasing as the core of the Earth swirls about. Europa, one

of Jupiter’s moons, is noted to be heating up too. How can an object so distant affect the planets and moons?

Human theories about the motion of the planets in their orbits, their placement, are based on theories that have little

basis in fact. All slung into position when the solar system first formed, and motion and centrifugal force are holding it

all in place. This is nonsense, as we have explained, and man’s theories fail to account for the vast majority of factors

that actually hold the motion of suns and solar systems in place in an equilibrium established coming out of any local

Big Bang. Mankind has faint explanation for why all the planets line up in the ecliptic, though this clearly is a flow of

particles and the planets are in the backwash. Earth’s magnetic field does not point in the direction it does by accident,

nor does the field simply encompass Earth. It goes far beyond the solar system, into several nearby systems and

beyond. Gravity, which holds the planets close to their Sun but also keeps them apart by the repulsion force, is little

understood by man who failed to understand this phenomenon in the context of a particle flow. They are still clinging

to the theory, without basis, that the Sun has magnetic reversals, as this is an explanation for why wandering poles are

evident on the crust of the Earth, when pole shifts are the obvious explanation and Hapgood long ago presented this.

Thus, they cannot conceive of an equilibrium in the solar system, being out of touch as they are with so many basic

issues.

When the 12th Planet is riding the mid-point of its orbit, the equilibrium exists. When it begins to approach, several

particle flows are changed, and as these particle flows envelope and influence Earth and the other planets in the

system, these changes become evident. Gravity and magnetic particles are only a couple of the flows affected. Now, in

any given equilibrium, change is noticed where the equilibrium is taken for granted. Thus, the fact that the Earth

rotations, has x temperature in its core, points in x direction, is taken as normal. When its temperature raises, this is

noticed, and commented upon. Why would the temperature not raise, when the core is pulled in more direction, has

more activity, and is thus exuding more heat particles. Magnetic diffusion is another change noticed, but this is easily

explained in the context of yet another magnetic planet coming closer, so that magnetic particles are flowing more

here, less there, in the vicinity of Earth. Thus, it is not so much what causes every change, upon the approach of the

12th Planet, as it is a mystery of why mankind is astonished. He is asleep on his assumptions, and only waking when

they move about! Thus, the approach of the 12th Planet is evidenced by changes in the solar system because the

equilibrium is being changed, the status quo altered, when it moves from a virtual standstill mid-way in its path to

begin a passage. This equilibrium should be viewed as a net reaching out into the Universe, encompassing not only a

local solar system but a galaxy. Why do the galaxies stay where they are? This is not a local affair!

Note: added during the Aug 24, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.

We have stated that Planet X is disrupting the Earth's equilibrium, and the equilibrium of other planets and their

moons, from afar. We have stated in explanation of this that mankind little realizes what an equilibrium in a solar

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s101.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:13 AM]

ZetaTalk: Equilibrium

system means, understanding little of the factors involved. We have stated that mankind assumes the planets are

staying where they are due to centrifugal force and motion established a long time ago, and has no explanation for the

ecliptic or the steady and undegrading orbits of the planets. We have stated that should mankind understand all the

factors involved in the solar system equilibrium, they would not be surprised at the changes, but they are so far from

understanding that shock is the reaction.

But a valid question, in this, is how the Earth could continue to be affected to the point of expressing magnetic

diffusion, when the Sun, the giant magnetic influence, stands between the Earth and Planet X. Is this not a buffer?

Would the magnetism not return to normal during these times? A disturbed equilibrium is not a simple thing, a wire

placed between the planets such that cutting this wire returns all to what man considers to be normal. A disturbed

equilibrium is many, virtually thousands, of factors, pulling in all directions, piling up and spilling over slowly,

disbursing in directions and then returning. Particle flow is something mankind does not understand, assuming gravity

to be a force, not a flow, and magnetism creating magnetic fields for unexplained reasons. Thus, when the Earth moves

such that the Sun is between Planet X and itself, all the many factors throughout the solar system continue to push and

pull, unchanged, and unchanged disruption in the equilibrium.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s101.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:13 AM]

ZetaTalk: Status Quo

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Status Quo

Note: written on May 15, 2002

We have explained on numerous occasions how equilibrium in a solar system works, but still this is confusing to our

audience. The existing structure is explained by mankind’s scientists as coming out of the big bang, planets caught in a

gravity field, on the move so not going directly into the sun, and thus establishing an orbit. Why all the planets are in

the ecliptic, like the rings of trash around Saturn, is not explained. How the Moon can remain aloft above Earth, while

so massive and moving so slowly, is not addressed, even though this does not compute when Newton's law of

Centrifugal Force and the Inverse Square Law of gravity, both mankind’s staples, are applied together using real, not

theoretical, factors.

Mankind cannot explain how his own solar system is structured, but presumes to insist that Centrifugal Force is what

keeps everything in the place it is, when combined with gravity attraction. In this context, it is understandable that

mankind is confused as to why a planet some 9 Sun-Pluto distances away can create a swirling core in the Earth when

first starting out on its periodic passage through the solar system. Gravity must be mild, as Jupiter does not seem to

affect the Earth. Magnetic confusion should be minimal, as Mercury is closer and seems to have no effect on Earth.

What is missing in these conclusions is the network that is in place, a stabilizing of all these pulls and pushes, which is not apparent to man as he is seeing the result, not the arrival, of the stabilizing.

Were everyone in a group to hold hands tightly, in a circle around a large air balloon, they would become fixed in

place, unable to move unless a grip was let go. A child, seeing this, would assume that this was "normal" and set about to play in the grass nearby. Should someone ask the child why these people were standing thus, he'd be puzzled, not

having noticed them, still as they were. But should a grip let go, on the opposite side of the balloon, bodies might jerk,

adjust, and the child startled. He does not see the point where the grip released. Likewise, a decrease in pressure in the

balloon would cause wiggling in the people thus circling, it, as now there was wiggle room where before they were

stretched tight. The child would be alarmed! Why are these people shuffling their feet, moving their handshakes up and

down! Perhaps turning their head to look his way! Thus, like a child, not understanding that the solar system you are

used to is the result of many factors fixed, but now adjusting, you see every change as a shock.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s125.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:14 AM]

ZetaTalk: Resonance

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Resonance

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The magnetic field of Earth is weakening, since a strong point estimated to be 2,000 years ago. Deep earthquakes

which rose almost exponentially between 1985 and 1995 have locked down the plates of Earth, such that quakes in one

plate ricochet to another place, and this process and be charted from quake statistics. The weather on Earth has gone

from being a bit wild to breaking records regularly to being so bizarre that broken records are never mentioned

anymore. More volcanoes are active on Earth than at any time in the memory of man. And though the oceans are

heating from the bottom up, and glaciers are retreating at an astonishing pace. The Earth’s rotation is slowing, such

that the full moon seems now to come early. But is it just the Earth that is affected by the movement of Planet X

toward the solar system, after its long stay at essentially the mid-point between its two foci?

From Mars, the Earth would appear to be quiescent, as few of these symptoms would be visible from space. Melting

ice is noticeable, and this has been noted on Europa, a moon of Jupiter. A slowing rotation would also be noticeable,

but until this becomes extreme would be hard to measure from a distance. What effects can be expected, in the planets

that share the solar system with Earth, as Planet X approaches?

Mercury, as Earth, has a magnetic core, and tilts in the same direction as Earth. Were Planet X to pass within 14

million miles of Mercury, as it is projected to pass Earth in 2003 [Note: see 2003 Date explanation], Mercury would experience a pole shift, though there is no life on that dead planet to care. Likewise, a slowing rotation would

occur on Mercury, due to the magnetic interference of Planet X during its approach.

Mars has given evidence of past pole shifts, as your scientists are aware from NASA reports. Is it being affected

during the coming approach? In the past, when the Sun had more mass, Planet X passed through the Asteroid

Belt, creating the accidents that the litter in this belt attests to. When passing closer to Mars, then a warm planet

with a molten core, pole shifting on occasion happened to Mars, but its distance from such trauma now is what

makes it attractive as a shift-evacuation point by NASA and the elite who control and dominate NASA.

Perturbations in the orbits of the outer planets will be palpable during the passage. Those planets on the

approach side will linger, and those attempting to leave or arrive at the approach side will slow or speed up in

their orbits due to the additional gravity tug. Being determined by multiple factors, orbits will not change,

beyond temporary perturbations in their speed, in the main. Unless literally bumped out of their orbits, planets

tend to return after perturbation to their normal pace around the Sun, and return to their normal rotation pace,

because of the many factors influencing orbit and rotation.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s110.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:14 AM]

ZetaTalk: Orbit Perturbations

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Orbit Perturbations

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

To understand why planets in orbit around a sun hold the positions they do, humans must imagine factors they are not

yet aware of, but can infer from the behavior of these planets - for instance, the orbital plane.

The orbital plane has planets slinging out from the middle of a rotating sun, as the rings of Saturn do around its

middle, because of a flow that is slung out from the rotating body that thence returns into the rotating body at the

poles. The planets in the orbital plane slung out from the middle of the sun are thus held away by this sling.

Planets do not flow with the sling round to the poles of the sun, because this would involve a trip too far away

from the sun, a gravitational giant, before the trip back. The gravitational draw here can be envisioned as a string

from the center of the sun to the planet.

Planets move, in concert, in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction around a sun due to sweeping arms that

reach out from the core of the rotating sun, brushing the planets before them. These sweeping arms can be

envisioned as the spokes of a wheel.

Planets stay in the orbital plane and do not drift to either side because of what we will refer to as eddy currents.

The sling out is not solely at the waist of the rotating sun but slings out at a diminishing rate on either side, but

the rate outward is greater at the waist. Thus, when the material being slung out from the middle of the rotating

sun tries to escape to the sides, it is caught and pulled back by the slower pace of the material at the sides,

creating a circular eddy current that returns it to the waist of the rotating sun. This eddy current can be

envisioned as flotsam on a river and the manner in which this gets drawn into the center of the river, where the

fastest flow occurs.

Planets find their niche in all this based on more than gravity or magnetism factors, as there are thousands of

forces that affect the placement of bodies free to move about in space. The entry of a new planet into the orbital

plane would results in a bumping outward or compressing inward of existing planets as this new planet

encountered the others during their journeys around the sun, until no further adjustments were required and an

equilibrium was established.

Now in this drama, place Planet X, inbound and making a fast passage through the solar system. It is first affected by

the eddy currents, which are in greater turmoil at a distance from the sun where the sling outward is reduced and the

eddy currents thus creating wider circles. This causes Planet X to draw up into the orbital plane early in its approach. It

is then caught in the sweeping arms, going with them in a counterclockwise manner until coming closer and picking up

speed it finds the arm sweep faster and stronger such that it is bumped back during the arm passage, essentially

skipping over the arm. This causes Planet X to assumes a retrograde motion during its approach. It then encounters an

increasingly strong flow of the material slinging out from the waist of the sun, while at the same time being drawn

increasingly by the sun’s gravitational field. This causes Planet X to drop below the ecliptic, to escape the outward

sling of this material. Finally, when the point of passage arrives, Planet X is zipping through the solar system at a 32

degree angle from the ecliptic, traversing the solar system in 3 short months [Note: see 2003 Date explanation]. In this passage, it is the lessor influence on the planets in the solar system, who are listening the sun’s influence almost

entirely during their orbits. Planet X is a bully, elbowing his way through a crowd, but affecting only those unfortunate

to be in his way or close enough to feel, directly or indirectly, the shoving and pushing.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s111.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:15 AM]

ZetaTalk: Booms

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Booms

Note: written on Jun 15, 1996.

Increasingly as the pole shift nears, the Earth will give evidence of the compression and tension in her surface by what

humans will perceive to be sonic booms. The mechanism is in fact the same, clapping air masses, the same mechanism

that produces thunder. Where thunder is caused by air masses separated by what is essentially a vacuum created by the

superheating lightning bolt, and where sonic booms are caused by a compressed air mass pushed in front of the plane

exploding back to equalize with the thin air mass trailing the plane, pre-cataclysm booms are caused by heaving in

large bodies of water. Earthquakes where plates are compressing are measured by humans as the friction causes jolting,

but for every compression adjustment there is, somewhere, a widening in a rift. Most often these rifts lie underwater, as

water fills low lying places. A widening rift does not jolt the bordering plates, it is a silent adjustment. However, the

sea water rushing to fill the new void has an effect on the air masses above, creating a thin air mass and causing the air

on all sides of this thin air space to rush in, and clap!

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s70.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:16 AM]

ZetaTalk: Flashes

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Flashes

Note: written on Jan 15, 1997.

Accompanying booms caused by heaving seas in response to earth movements will increasingly be flashes of light,

leading the startled public to perceive that an explosion might have happened. As the booms happen over water where

could the spark for an explosion come from? These are indeed related to the booms, and are indeed explosions, and

emerge from the same source. As we have stated in explanation to the Tunguska explosion, great pools of methane gas

lie trapped under the surface in certain areas of the world, due to rotting debris trapped under layers of volcanic ash or

sediment. Just as the booms indicate adjustments in the sea bed causing heaving water to clap, just so the flashes

indicate adjustments in land masses allowing the methane gas to escape and on occasion spark into an explosion.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s82.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:16 AM]

ZetaTalk: Pole Reversals

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Pole Reversals

Note: written on Jul 15, 1995.

Do the Earth's poles ever suffer a reversal during a pole shift? No. The Earth's polarity, where the magnetic North Pole

points consistently in one direction as though focused on a distant point in the Universe, does not change, ever. This is an illusion, a hypothesis that humans have concocted to explain what they find in the Earth's crust. In this hypothesis,

they are assuming that the Earth's crust does not move about, but it does. What humans are measuring is the confusion

in the crust, and not the direction of the magnetic North Pole. Between pole shifts, however, there are slight

movements of the magnetic North Pole, especially during the time just before and after a pole shift - approximately a

hundred years on either side. The giant comet speaks to the Earth from afar. Scientists who do not buy into the pole

shift will argue endlessly that it is the poles that move and reverse, and any discussion with such scientists should

begin by first clarifying the pole shift premise. Sometimes, during a pole shift, the movement is slight, and sometimes

literal reversals take place, where the crust does, as you say, a 180. The coming shift will come close to that, being

better than a quarter turn. Having only the Earth's crust to examine, and being in denial or unaware of pole shifts, a

human could only assume that the poles had moved, rather than the crust.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s27.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:17 AM]

ZetaTalk: Rotation Reversals

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Rotation Reversals

Note: written on Apr 15, 1999. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Great variance can exist, from one passage of the 12th Planet to another. In some cases, as has been recorded by Plato,

the Earth in fact rotates in a different direction from its current rotation. There are many factors that influence rotation,

and those that dominate the scene immediately after a shift will determine the direction of rotation. If the core of the

Earth is highly confused after a pole shift, swirling about under the dictates of many influences so that the normal

dominance of the core in determining rotation has been muted or silenced, then the rotation of the Earth can be

dictated by its immediate surroundings. The direction of rotation tends to perpetuate itself, so if rotation starts in other

than the normal direction, it may be slower and arguing with itself, so to speak. These rotations are slower than the 24

hour day that you are recording now. If rotation is in accordance with many influences, lining up so that the motion

chases and then departs from these influences quickly, then rotation can be slightly faster than the 24 hour day that you

are recording now.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s98.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:17 AM]

ZetaTalk: Shift Threshold

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Shift Threshold

Note: written on Dec 15, 2000. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

If the 12th Planet causes a pole shift in the Earth as it passes, being the larger body between the two, how is it that the

12th Planet itself does not experience a pole shift as it passes the Sun, which is a larger body than the 12th Planet.

Magnetic fields clash with one another when a certain closeness creates a particle press. When there is room for a

particle flow, magnetic fields can exist side-by-side with the only effect being an increased speed of flow where the

fields brush one another. Side-by-side fields find their particle flows moving in the same direction - South to North in

the interior of the mass and then arching around from North to South on the periphery. The North to South flow on

side-to-side fields is thus moving in the same direction. End-to-end fields likewise do not have a conflict, but link up

to have a longer flow through the interior of both masses, and a longer flow back down along the periphery.

What happens during a passage is that the flows clash, and the density of particles pushes the magnetic bodies about.

Think of the North pole as a water hose, a force of water coming from it capable of pushing solid objects aside. When

this force cannot go up and through the center of another magnetic object in front of it, it must have someplace to go.

Two magnets placed side-by-side on a table will co-exist if placed far enough away from each other. Two or more

magnets placed end-to-end will snap together forming a larger magnet, North pole to South. Two magnets prevented

from snapping together when one passes the other, coming from the south, will have a particle flow force coming from

the North pole of the passing object - a South to North flow. This particle flow meets the peripheral or returning

particle flow of the stationary object - a North to South flow. The clash pushes against the weaker flow, which in the

case of the Earth and the 12th Planet is the Earth's particle flow. In essence, the Earth is pushed so that it's magnetic

flow during the passage lines up with the 12th Planet's flow, as this relieves the particle pressure.

Now, does the 12th Planet not experience such a clash with the Sun as it passes between the Earth and the Sun? It does

not, because it has placed itself away from the Sun due to the Repulsion Force - an adjustment caused by the flow of

gravity particles. This is the stronger flow, and one that has a larger reach, so the trajectory of the 12th Planet as it

zooms through the solar system is guided by gravity matters, primarily. The 12th Planet and the Sun have a parallel

field, a side-by-side situation, during the passage. The hapless Earth, being too small a voice in this matter, does not

dominate any placement or trajectory. It is treated, during the passage, like litter along the highway to be blown about

by passing traffic.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s102.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:18 AM]

ZetaTalk: Weakest Link

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Weakest Link

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.

That the entire earth can tilt in space is a confusing point to humans in understanding pole shifts. Humans are drenched

in Newtonian theory, which explains the planets maintained in their orbits based on centrifugal force and momentum.

All of this falls apart when Newton's math is applied to your Moon, so very close at hand yet too large and slow

moving to even stay up there, per Newton. Nevertheless, Newton is force-fed to humans in school so they contemplate

pole shifts in this venue, and boggle. Per Newton, both the Earth and another passing planet would plod on, just

passing but not affecting each other except for gravity, a tug in this or that direction.

But this is wrong, on several points.

Human's measure their magnetic field on the surface of the crust, which is composed of hardened lava which points in

the direction of the magnetic field at the time the lava hardened, and thus sends many signals to dilute any given

compass measurement. The crust moved, after lava hardened, and this is a buffer for the true magnetic field coming

from the core. This is far stronger, and reaches further into space, than most humans imagine. As we have explained,

magnetism is a particle flow, as is gravity. Additionally, rotation is not caused by some initial momentum long ago

instituted but by the various components of a liquid core in motion, attracted and repulsed by this or that in the

surrounding solar system and thus trying to get closer or farther away, within the confines of the sphere the core finds

itself in. But without arguing these points, the issue in pole shifts is what the weakest link is when the magnetic fields clash.

Is it the orbit position, which might tilt to allow a pole shift to occur simply due to orbit changes? Perturbations in the orbit, due to gravity pull, but not a tilted orbit, per human astrophysics. Would a passing planet draw another closer to

it, temporarily? This argument would not cause a pole shift, but a temporary slowing down or speeding up in the orbit

path, per human astrophysics. It is drag, rotation slowing due to extra man-made lakes around the equator, that silly

argument put forth by humans to explain a barely perceptible slowdown in rotation speed, lately increasing? Drag

would cause a slowed rotation, but not a tilt. Humans, schooled into dead-think in their autocratic schools, have no

way to explain pole shifts without being open minded and exploratory, those attribute that get them punished in their

schools and yelled at by the Shepherds of the Sheep of the sci.astro Usenet. So mention of a pole shift, and its

mechanisms, creates a yawn, not a query, in most.

Indeed, there are many factors that hold a body in its orbit, beyond what human astrophysicists conclude. But to avoid

endless arguments about endless factors, let us simply state that the orbit involves many bodies and forces outside of

the planet itself, and thus is not the weak link. The orbit continues on, and does not tilt. Gravity likewise would not

cause the planet to tilt, but rather draw closer or, if one is given to consider the gravity counterpoint, the Repulsion

Force, to push away and not tilt. Both we and humans agree on these points, but for different reasons. But what holds

the core of the Earth so firmly that it cannot move in its molten mush, during the passage of another planet with a

magnetic field? This can move, without affecting the orbit or the relative position to other bodies re gravity factors,

and it does move. Place two magnets end to end, and they are happy to line up. Place two magnets side by side, and

they both try to move so that they line up. Make one of these magnets several times the mass of the other, and the

larger dominates in this motion. Thus, the Earth moves, in place, in its orbit, at the point where the passage itself

occurs, the north pole of the passing planet no longer approaching the south pole of the Earth, but passing it, thus

dragging this south pole along with its north pole during the passage.

Thus, you have wandering poles, magnetic fields pointing in all directions in frozen lava, crust shifting to bring

mastodons into the polar circle with green grass in their stomachs, flash frozen to be discovered and pondered over by

modern man. And thus, during this close approach of this very magnetic planet that is heading toward Earth from the

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s104.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:19 AM]

ZetaTalk: Weakest Link

south now, you have a swirling core heating the Earth up from the core upwards, causing polar and glacial melt which

cannot be explained by any increase in atmospheric temperatures, and magnetic diffusion which is estimated by

humans to eliminate the Earth's magnetic field in 1,250 years at the current rate. Of course, they are wrong in their

estimate but at least are honest enough to acknowledge that diffusion is occurring. The approaching passage, and its

effect on the Earth, explains these phenomena, where the Shepherds of the Sheep of sci.astro have no such explanation

save the laughable.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s104.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:19 AM]

ZetaTalk: Close Pass

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Close Pass

Note: written on Jan 15, 2001. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

This pole shift is a particularly severe one, but the 12th Planet will come no closer than 14 million miles to the Earth.

There have been worse pole shifts in the past, but not by much. These kind of pole shifts, as this one, cause the Earth

to attempt an almost 180 degree shift. However, the crust does not really succeed in going that distance, because the

core separates from the crust as it rips the 180, so the crust only makes it about a quarter turn, a 90 degree shift. This

particular pole shift will cause a dramatic shortening of the Pacific, a dramatic widening of the Atlantic, and was

known for some time to be one of the more severe pole shifts, which is why the Transformation was scheduled at this

time.

If the 12th Planet were twice the distance away, 28 million miles rather than 14 million miles, the effect would be

diminished by 73%, and the core would attempt to turn with less ferocity, and would only make it approximately 32

degrees, dragging the crust that 32 degrees because the rate of turn would be slower. If the 12th Planet were to be 52

millions miles from Earth, rather than 28, the effect would be so mild as to be considered an adjustment to the current

poles, with a number of volcanoes exploding and high tides to height of perhaps 100 feet high in places on Earth, but

many places on Earth would be almost unaware that a lurching occurrence had happened. They would be considered

mild earthquakes in most places on Earth.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s103.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:19 AM]

ZetaTalk: Magnetic/Geographic

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Magnetic/Geographic

Note: written on Jul 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Why do the magnetic and geographic poles differ, and as the Earth's geographic poles causes the magnetic poles to

wobble about, does this not indicate that the Earth's magnetism is intrinsic only to the Earth? This is not the case. Does

not the runner, going in a straight path, to his way of thinking, heave to the right and then to the left. Take the speed

skater, who swings wildly to the right and left, for balance, but is indeed going in a straight direction. Would you

explain to someone watching the skater that they should determine the direction based on the wild swinging, when it is

obvious that the direction is constant? Does not the direction equal the sum of the parts? Is not the balance, the center

point, what counts? The issue of interest here is not the Earth's wobble, but that the geographic and magnetic poles

differ. Why would this be, especially as the difference causes a wobble in the magnetic allegiance with the Universe?

After a pole shift the Earth's rotation begins again, just as soon as the bully 12th Planet leaves the scene, which is

within days. The core of the Earth, having been confused by the 12th Planet, swirls about finding its magnetic

moorings again. The crust of the Earth by now has stopped its slide, and again connects, gravitationally, to the greater

Solar System in the attraction/repulsion dance that planets perpetually go through. The other planets in the Solar

System, as the Earth, are in motion. The tug and push begins again, and the Earth begins to rotate. But the core has not

yet settled, being more fluid than the crust, and takes awhile to settle down to align with the magnetic influences of the

Universe round about. Thus, the magnetic pole may finally settle into a position other than the geographic pole, which

has preceding it in being established. This changes during every pole shift, at times the poles lining up, at times a

discrepancy.

In general, the rotation versus the magnetic tilt is closely in alignment, the present 23 degree being an aberration. The

last pole shift, during the Jewish Exodus, was violent and quick, the passage so close and rapid that the ocean rifts

were ripped wide enough to drop the ocean 16-20', as has been measured, as the shift no sooner started than stopped.

This was a lurching, ramming effect to the plates, which bumped into each other and ricocheted and ripped. Therefore,

because of the quick and violent nature of the last pole shift, there is a difference between the geographic and magnetic

poles, which usually tend to be closer than 10 degrees. We anticipate this next passage to be more in alignment,

although it will be many decades before the survivors can determine where the magnetic north and south poles are, due

to the period of time the core takes to settle down and demonstrate its regular resonance.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s28.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:20 AM]

ZetaTalk: Wandering Poles

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Wandering Poles

Note: written on Jun 15, 1996.

The wandering poles attest to prior pole shifts but don't give a true picture, as many times poles situate over oceans or

land that subsequently submerges, areas unexplored by modern man. Humans measure the significance of pole shifts

by their variance from today's poles, where in fact the measure should be from the pole's placement prior to the shift.

What is termed a wandering pole is mankind's best efforts to trace the placement of the poles, dating the record in

hardened magma which captures the moment's magnetic alignment. The Ice Ages, occurring over northern Europe and

America, are also written records of when poles were situated over those spots. Pole shifts can be as slight as a few

degrees or close to 180 degrees, the most extreme case.

Where the Earth is close to the point of passage, as it will be during the coming pole shift, the Earth's core drags

her crust into opposition to the 12th Planet's magnetic alignment, her North Pole heading directly south, and

there the crust stays while the core gradually rights itself.

Where pole shifts are so slight as to be nonexistent the Sun stands between the Earth and her larger brother, the

12th Planet.

Where the Earth is a quarter way around the elliptic a different drama takes place, as rather than move into

opposition to the 12th Planet, the move is to come into alignment.

Distance makes some difference, but more influential is whether the two planets are lined up pole to pole or side to side

on the approach. In a pole to pole confrontation the 12th Planet's North Pole essentially grips the Earth's South Pole

and drags it with it as it passes, pushing away the North Pole. In a side to side confrontation, the Earth is only nudged

to line up with her brother, just as small magnetic particles in ore attempt to align with each other. The position of the

Earth or the 12th Planet during any passage is strictly by chance, governed by the various influences that affect the

arrival of the 12th Planet, which can meet with any number of delaying influences on its journey. Thus, there is no

regularity to dramatic pole shifts, where the Earth is essentially turned upside down.

Dramatic reversals happen rarely, as the 12th Planet must virtually come between the Earth and the Sun to have this

much influence. This happens in only 15% of the pole shifts, as where this vulnerable position constitutes perhaps

30% of the possible arc, the range of possibility is such that the Earth may be on the opposite side of the Sun just as

often as not, cutting these odds in half. When the Sun stands between the Earth and the 12th Planet there is, in essence,

no pole shift but simple tension and compression in the crust, expressed as increased earthquakes and volcanism. This

safety zone constitutes another 40% of the possible arc. The remaining 45% of the arc experiences alignment shifts,

rather than opposition shifts. Thus, the wandering Poles reflect 15% massive opposition movement, where the North

Pole is tipped backwards away from the 12th Planet, balanced by 45% minor alignment movement, where the North

Pole is tipped forward slightly to line up with the 12th Planet's magnetic alignment.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s72.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:21 AM]

ZetaTalk: Wandering Poles

This finds the records of where the North and South Poles have been, in the main, essentially close to their position at

present. Mankind is missing at least half the record, those former poles which are now under water, but the pattern

would not look much different with these missing pieces added. Human written and verbal history will not serve man

well in preparation for the forthcoming pole shift, as a shift as devastating as this one will be has not occurred even

within the past 50,000 years. Even The Flood was merely the result of two minor shifts, back to back - one to displace

the South Pole so that partial melting and softening started, and the second to break and drop the suspended ice into

the ocean.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s72.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:21 AM]

ZetaTalk: Chance of Collision

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Chance of Collision

Note: written on Aug 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

In the past, the 12th Planet's orbit was farther out in your Solar System, but over the eons your Sun has lost mass, and

the orbit now comes between the Earth and the Sun. What is the risk of collision between the comet and the other

planets in the Solar System? Where the Earth and the comet were in each other's path in the past, there was more than

the element of chance involved. You, on your highways, have hurtling missiles on a collision course with each other

by the millions, yet you have very few collisions. There is an additional factor in place in planetary collisions, as they

are no more without drivers than your hurtling automobiles. All planetary bodies have attraction/repulsion factors at

play, and when they come close to each other they in fact push each other away. This in almost all cases suffices to

prevent collision, although for any inhabitants it is a shaky experience.

Where actual collisions occur there is a difference in body size, with the smaller object traveling at great speed. The

speed overcomes the repulsion, and the smaller object also becomes caught in the gravitational pull of the larger

object. Such is the case, for instance, when meteors fall to Earth.

There are remnants of planets between tiny Mars and the giant Jupiter, which once held the potential for life such as

your Earth now holds. These water planets met their death during the Asteroid Belt confrontations, where missiles

went every which way during the passing comet's journey. Should your Solar System not have been so disturbed, you

would not be counting the comet as the 12th Planet (or actual 10th orbiting Planet) but as the 24th Planet. Most of the

planets that were destroyed were tiny, like Mars or less, and quite vulnerable to destruction by a larger traveling body.

They became caught in the gravitational web of the traveling monster, drawn in to become moons, or what we call

travelers, and it was one such that struck the Earth early in her life, and gave her the wound that is now the deep

Pacific Ocean.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s30.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:21 AM]

ZetaTalk: Rotation/Orbit

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Rotation/Orbit

Note: written during the August 31, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC session. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same. In the writeup below,

east-to-west means Sun rising in the East, west-to-east means Sun rising in the west.

At every passage, as Velikovsy noted in this Worlds in Collision book, there is the potential for a disturbed orbit. Plato

mentions that the Earth had been known to rotate with the Sun rising in the west, setting in the east, not east-to-west,

in the past. The Asteroid Belt clearly shows that collisions occurred, and it would be expected that planets not reduced

to rubble might have been knocked out of their orbits, into new orbits, by this. The Earth shows evidence, in her deep

history reflecting long past events, that she did not have the sunlight, nor the land mass above water, in her past that

she does today. So, would such an occurrence happen this next passage, and might the Earth anticipate a warmer, or

colder, climate based on being nudged in toward the Sun, or out into the cold? To understand why this will not occur

requires understanding of what dictates orbits in the first place, something mankind has little grasp of. Orbits are based

on an equilibrium established between the nearby planets, who bump each other with the many particle flows that

mankind is unaware of, until a status quo is established. It is this status quo that mankind views, and assumes was there

all along. This passage will put Planet X rapidly and at close hand passing the Earth, and the Earth alone. All other

planets will be spared any influence to leave their orbits, so let us concentrate on the Earth.

The Earth is in its steady orbit because of factors so numerous that we could not list them without the audience going

to sleep, as it would take Nancy more than 24 hours to type them all. None of these factors is going to leave the area, or change, because of a swift passage of Planet X. The only lasting influence will be that the core moves, doing a shift,

and the crust is dragged along. After Planet X passes, the Earth has all the factors that created her orbit, and her

rotation, in place as before. This is why we have stated that she will resume rotation within a day of passage. An east-

to-west orbit is presumed, because the core is still mobile, and moves in those directions based on attractions it has to elements in the solar system. The core, of course, has been turned almost 180 degrees, during the shift, the crust not

making it to that degree before stopping. The core is mobile, and in motion already, not having stopped during the

week of rotation stoppage but continuing to strain in the direction it had.

During the shift, this motion from east-to-west does not stop, but continues, as it shifts. Thus, where temporarily it is under an influence to move west to east, there is just as many influences to continue the east-to-west as the liquid core

realigns, without delay, reversing it’s 180 degree turn, so as to position itself with the magnetic alignment of the Sun,

once again. Where the shift was sudden, dragging the core in all its layers along with the crust, this realignment is

slower and the crust has already been separated from the core and its layers, thus remains where it is, during this

realignment. The core is mobile, and the virtual liquid factors are more mobile yet, so the competing influences resolve

for the stronger force, the magnetic realignment which the more liquid portions of the core represent. Thus, in the past, as Plato stated, the Earth has at times turned west-to-east, but in the main rotation resumes east-to-west, which the

liquid portions of the core find fits their stretching toward their attractants. We anticipate thus, that the Earth will not

only not assume a different orbit, having no factors to knock it from its orbit, and will also resume rotation east-to-

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s128.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:22 AM]

ZetaTalk: Rotation/Orbit

west.

The matter of a 24 hour day will not be settled for some months after the shift, though few will be concerned about

this. Rotation will be a bit erratic, faster on some days, slower on others, but will eventually settle down to something

similar to a 24 hour day. Why would this be? Because the rotation speed is dictated by the liquidity of the core, and

this has not changed.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s128.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:22 AM]

ZetaTalk: Asteroid Belt

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Asteroid Belt

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The Asteroid Belt, full of gravel and boulders, did not get there by accident. When your Solar System, forming matter,

was into clumping matter together, and did not overlook this one little orbit around this one little Sun for some odd

reason. For those who argue otherwise, we ask why all the other planetary orbits are free of this scatter, and why the

Earth is lopsided, the land in the main on one side and the waters in the main on the other. The two relate. Long before

there was highly evolved life on the Earth, it rode that orbit, which happened to be smack dab in the path of the 12th

Planet. In due time, more than violent pole shifts and wobbly orbits resulted, a monumental collision between the

emerging Earth and a traveling moon drawn along by the gravitational pull of the 12th Planet occurred. This collision

did not just involve the emerging Earth, then almost entirely a water planet.

Your Solar System had several more planets in orbit than it does today, in orbit close enough to the Asteroid Belt to be

considered within it, many of these planets were larger than the Earth.. Just as the 12th Planet drags behind it many

moons, these planets also had moons, so the field was crowded during the 12th Planet's periodic passage. The

repulsion force prevents large object of a similar size from impact, because the flow of gravity particles acts like a

firehose pointed toward one another, the colliding spray of the particle flow pushing back and away, at the same time

the return flow of these gravity particles is pulling the two planets toward each other. But when any inequity of size

exists, the repulsion force weakens. The greater the inequity, the greater the weakness. The firehose from the smaller

object is overwhelmed by the return flow of gravity particles returning to the larger object. Thus, a large boulder

would drop to Earth, but your Moon does not.

The Asteroid Belt was created when trash in the 12th Planets tail crashed into moons of some of the large planet in the

Asteroid Belt, putting them in motion so that they became missiles directed at other planets. Eventually with all this

bumping around in a crowded field, the inequity was great enough, the size disproportionate enough, that shattering of

a small planet occurred. Magma sprayed outward in a burst, creating hardened magma in space which then itself

became a missile on the move. Once begun, this process accelerates, creating increasing incidences where a piece of

trash is large enough to shatter a planet. The planets disintegrate not because the missile is so large it physically breaks it apart, but because the molten core is opened, forcefully, and the lava pushed outward in a plume by the missile. Now

the crust implodes, and the repercussions of this cause more magma plumes, so that the planet eventually does not

have the mass to prevent a collision, by virtue of a repulsion force. Thus these wasted shells eventually collide with

each other, breaking them into what you now term asteroids.

Matter went in every direction and the impacts were fierce. Shattered matter, moving at differing speeds, bumping into

each other and slinging off into different directions, were missiles of death for some time. One disaster followed

another, until at last there were no more hapless planets to be pelted into pieces. The Earth, her waters scattered more

readily than her bulk, wobbled out of orbit at the initial impact. Her wobble took her, eventually, into her present orbit,

closer to the Sun. Here she has formed her present oval shape bit by bit, under the periodic visits of her larger brother,

the 12th Planet, who gives her no peace. She is still attempting to fill in the gaping hole, the scar from that devastating

impact, the gaping expanse between the Americas and the Pacific Rim - the broad Pacific Ocean.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s11.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:22 AM]

ZetaTalk: Near Earth Asteroids

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Near Earth Asteroids

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Indeed, the last passage was closer than the pending one in 2003 [Note: see 2003 Date explanation]. This is why we have stated that the crust shift during the prior shift was less than will be anticipated in 2003, as no sooner had the core

started to shift, it moved to align with the passing Planet X. What happens on such close passage? There is a great deal

of trash that trails behind Planet X, caught in its gravity field. Several moons, and lesser objects such as boulders and

dust. There are likewise asteroids from the Asteroid Belt which attach during a passage, but can be torn away when a

passage close to another gravitational object occurs. These minor objects assume new orbits, in many cases around

more than one planet if they are in close proximity to each other at the time, and finally to become disconnected or to

assume what is termed a Near Earth Orbit object. How do you suppose they got into those orbits in the first place?

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s113.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:23 AM]

ZetaTalk: Continental Drift

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Continental Drift

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Looking down from space, man can clearly see that the continents once formed a whole. Like the pieces of a puzzle

that can be placed together, South America fits nicely into the curve of the Western African coast, and North America

tucks up against Europe. All was one land mass in the past, so why have the continents drifted so far apart? And what,

in fact, caused the globe to be so lumpy in the first place? Don't planets spinning from a molten state assume a circular

shape? The answer, of course, is that the present Earth did not grow from a molten mass spinning slowly as it cooled,

and thus lost this chance to gain a consistently round shape. When it was round, its watery nature would have

precluded the type of intelligence that now inhabits it, as it would have remained a water planet as it was originally,

with barely a point sticking bravely above the water's surface.

The Earth was once in orbit farther from the Sun, and bore as life only cold creatures that lived in the dark waters on

the scant vegetation that grew there. This planet, the pre-Earth, sustained a collision with the 12th Planet's entourage of

many moons, and thus shattered drifted into a new orbit closer to the Sun. The larger piece became the Earth, with its

waters pooling in the wound as a cosmetic, the motion of the Earth pulling the waters round, to give a smooth

appearance. But this peace lasts only until the great one returns for its periodic visit, pulling at the lumpy Earth. The

inconsistencies of the surface only make the gravitational pulls of the 12th Planet more devastating, the continents like

handles to be grabbed and jerked. Likewise, the depth of the Pacific trough is vulnerable, a weak point on the surface

for the continents to slide toward. Thus we have continental drift, which is much too benign a word to use for the

cataclysms that occur.

The Earth, during each successive Pole Sift, has filled her wound. At first, due to the lopsided nature of her shape, the

tug toward roundness was slight. What was there to tug toward? She hugged herself, all on one side, and each passage

of the giant comet only pulled slightly at this hug, separating her land mass and moving this into the gap. But each

succeeding passage found a more vulnerable scene, and the separating of the single land mass increased. Why so?

Because rifts, driven between land masses, were vulnerable spots, torn recently, tearable again. Increasingly the

Americas have moved away from the African and European continents. Now, when the Americas are almost midway

between the other land masses, and the African land mass has cleanly separated too, they are more vulnerable to

becoming fully balanced during a pole shift than ever. During this pole shift the Pacific gap will close, equalizing the

land masses as they spread around the globe. This will be devastating to certain subducting areas, such as India and

Western Australia, and will heat to a tremendous degree those plates that are above the subducting plates in California,

Tibet, and along the Pacific Rim.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s07.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:23 AM]

ZetaTalk: Meteors

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Meteors

Note: written on Apr 15, 1996. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

In the Arizona desert lies a perfect meteor crater, unaffected by the erosion that comes from washing water. Looking at

a map of the Americas, one wonders about the circle that the Gulf of Mexico forms. And a close look at the Moon

reveals many dust softened meteor craters. Humans comfort themselves by explaining that these impacts happened

long ago, when the Solar System was forming, but the Arizona desert was once a sea bed, and meteor craters under

water soon lose their edges, melting into the mush of the sea bed. These craters were not made by comets, the balls of

ice sent flying when the water planets in the Asteroid Belt were pelted to pieces. Comets lack the solid substance. Nor

were these craters made by the trash now floating in the Asteroid Belt, for if this trash were going to move out of the

niche it has found it would have done so promptly after becoming trash.

During the time when the Earth rode a different track, located within the Asteroid Belt, collisions were frequent. The

Earth was not the first water planet to be pelted by one of the 12th Planet's traveling moons, and once the breakup

started there were missiles going in every direction for some time. When the Earth sustained her great wound where

the Pacific Ocean now pools, she was not struck just once, but was pelted repeatedly, even with her own flying

fragments. Her waters scattered, the remaining waters pooling in her wounds, and thus the soft sea bed that is now the

rock hard soil of the Arizona desert easily molded into an impact impression, later to dry and harden, and soften no

more.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s65.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:24 AM]

ZetaTalk: African Coapies

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: African Coapies

Note: written on Jun 15, 1996.

The plains of Africa are flat, in the main, baked during the seasonal droughts and unperturbed by earthquakes. Yet

among the rolling hills and broad valleys are rock outcroppings that stand as peculiar to their surroundings. Unlike the

wind or water sculpted remnants of sandstone hills, the Coapies are solid rock. To understand their origin one must put

aside the concept of the African continent as land, and realize that its origins were as a sea bed, formed as sediments.

Originally a water planet, the proto- Earth was entirely underwater when her crust hardened. Following her collision

with one of the many moons that travel behind the 12th Planet, the Earth settled into her current orbit and began

reshaping herself into a globe, minus much of her water. Land formed under the sea can be compressed sediment or

hardened lava, and during times of turmoil the soft sediment can wash away, leaving lava plums standing alone in

stark contrast to their surroundings. Such was the origin of the African Coapies.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s71.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:24 AM]

ZetaTalk: Earth Twin

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Earth Twin

Note: written on Oct 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Just as your Sun has a dead twin, the second focus of the 12th Planet's orbit, likewise your Earth has a dead twin that

shares her orbit and is placed so exactly opposite the Earth that it can never be seen. Theories about the Earth's dark

twin, which does exist, have been around for decades. They emerged because of the observed perturbations of the

planets. This twin is close enough, within your Solar System, to be visible by the reflected rays from the Sun, if it were

not hidden behind the Sun. That the dead twin matches pace with the Earth is not by coincidence. During the period

when the Earth was knocked out of her initial orbit by a clash with one of the 12th Planet's travelers, the Earth found

an orbital niche around the Sun that was appropriate for her size and composition, a niche, not surprisingly, that the

dead twin likewise fits. Why do these matched planets place themselves exactly opposite? Any less than this creates

an imbalance in the many forces that control orbits, such that there is pressure and nudging and pulling and increased

or decreased speed on one or the other until this is perfectly balanced.

Put two ball bearings in a circular track and spin this, and you soon find that the balls are opposite each other. Just so

do these two evenly matched planets find this position opposite each other.

Why did the ancient Summerians, quoting from the visitors from the 12th Planet, not count this twin? As they counted

the Moon, for instance, it would seem too great an oversight for them to miss a planet the approximate size of Earth,

and since they counted dead planets as well as those holding life, the Earth and Mars, there would be no reason for the

oversight. The visitors from the 12th Planet were concerned with counting major road signs. Were you to travel cross

country without a map, your directions would include major cities along the road, or major landmarks along the road,

and the approximate distance between them, but there would be no necessity to go into detail about any given

landmark, saying, for instance, that this city was larger than another. The cities would be known as the city by the

river, or the city in the clouds, but not as the city with an equally large suburb nearby.

Their shuttles took them from their home, the 12th Planet, to the Earth or Mars or the Moon when the 12th Planet was

crossing through the orbital plane. Coming in from the outer solar system, at an approximate 11 degree angle from the

orbital plane, and peeping through their version of telescopes, the hominoids on the 12th Planet could identify the

planets by their relative position from the Sun. Why was the Moon counted, and not the Earth's dead twin? They not

only landed on Earth, they landed on the Moon where they had a telescopic station clear of the Earth's ever cloudy

atmosphere. In fact, one of the reasons for recording the Moon was to differentiate it from its dead twin. It's the one in

that position that has a Moon, not the other. Were they not interested in the dead twin, for mining? As it has no

atmosphere, and no water to speak of, it was considered inhospitable. Mars was used until they ruined it, and the Moon

was a stopping point only briefly. Their mining operations were a 3,657 year stint, a long time for living off supplies.

The Earth’s dead twin has likewise been omitted from astronomy lists due to the unease those who were in involved in

Alternative 3 have about their past actions. Mankind’s awareness of this dead twin arose during the discussions that

MJ12 had early on with aliens in the Service-to-Self just prior to the time of Roswell. During that time, ALL

information learned from aliens was withheld from the public, and after the debacle that Alternative 3 became,

releasing any information at all about the Earth’s dead twin was doomed for the lifetime of the participants. In the

same manner that the records on JFK’s assassination will be sealed for several more decades, these records were

sealed, to protect the guilty during their lifetimes. Who is aware of the Earth’s dead twin? NASA and JPL and a

handful of astronomers working at the major observatories. Just as the approach of the 12th Planet, i.e. Planet X, is

know to these individuals and kept from the public, information on the dead twin is a forbidden subject. This is termed

a matter of national security, subject to imprisonment and other harsh punishment, and as those who enter into this

realm soon discern, even an accidental death at the hands of those who fear the release of this information. Thus, the

common man, without access to the information that NASA has but won’t allow the public access to, has no facts by

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s37.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:25 AM]

ZetaTalk: Earth Twin

which to arrive at the truth.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s37.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:25 AM]

ZetaTalk: Oil Deposits

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Oil Deposits

Note: written on Oct 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Oil, gas, and coal deposits are indeed the product of biological elements decomposing under great heat and pressure,

but this is not the only source of these products. They form in the atmosphere under certain conditions, where intense

heat from exploding volcanoes and continuous lightning create the equivalent of petrol-chemicals from the carbon,

hydrogen, and oxygen in the atmosphere. Those who doubt this statement may point to modern day volcanic eruptions

and lightning storms, which give no evidence of such formations, but the modern day environment is not equivalent to

what is present during a Pole Shift, during the trauma that the Earth undergoes during the passage of her brother, the

12th Planet.

Why is it that oil and gas deposits are not forming today? Is the climate so different from the climates of the past? Do

not earthquakes bury forests and does not lava flow over grasslands? The theories on oil and gas formations could be

put to the test daily, during this modern day, but no such proof has ever been proffered or in fact even sought. Oil and

gas do not form under normal circumstances, they form under extraordinary circumstances, and for the Earth most

often these circumstances are presented during a pole shift, where forests do get sandwiched between layers of rock

and lava floods over broad areas. Petrol-chemicals that form in the sky, where they fail to burn due to lack of free

oxygen, soak into the fractured ground and become trapped during the settling process that afterquakes provide for

many years after a pole shift.

In most cases, such petrochemicals formed in the atmosphere during pole shifts and seeping into the fractured ground

are broken down by the normal process of decay of organic matter. Oil that humans find today was protected from this

process by being sealed off from the air, creating a tomb where bacteria could not proceed unabated. On land, this

quick seal occurred because the massive tidal waves that accompany pole shifts would smother the fractured ground in

a stagnant layer of trapped sea water. This, of course, would evaporate over time, leaving a salt cap over the oil

deposits, and thus the association of oil with salt deposits.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s38.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:26 AM]

ZetaTalk: Planet X

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Planet X

Note: written on Feb 15, 1996. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Planet X does exist, and it is the 12th Planet, one and the same. When first sighted via infrared readings and reported

by the IRAS team in 1983, the IRAS findings were taken in many ways by the human scientists reading the reports,

and thus they cast many interpretations on just what the 12th Planet's infrared reading might imply. Infrared heat can

be taken to mean many things, depending on distance, size, and composition of the object being sensed. A very hot

object far away can be comparable to a barely warm object near at hand, or a very large object far away can be

considered to be a smaller object close at hand, and as the compression caused by the mass of an object is considered

to produce infrared rays, then a very heavy but cold object could be considered comparable to a lighter but warmer

object. The scientists reading the IRAS findings took the 12th Planet, a.k.a. Planet X, to be larger, colder, and farther

away, as the mind does not want to comprehend the alternatives. When first sighted in 1983, it was on the right hand

side of Orion, as viewed from your northern hemisphere. It will first move left and up toward the elliptical plane as it

nears the Earth's Solar System for its passage, as though to assume a place with the other planets in the Solar System,

at this point being slightly to the left of Orion. In 1998 it will veer right, moving toward Taurus and Aries, assuming a

retrograde orbit, and will come up through the plane as viewed from above the elliptical plane, in its first passage.

The reason given, officially, for the search for Planet X was the perturbations in the outer planets, known for some

centuries and hardly explained by the discovery of Pluto. Just as the planned settlements on Mars are given and official

explanation to the populace, which is paying for all of this, the search for Planet X could scarcely be hidden from

public view. What the public was not told, of course, was that the press for certainty was due to information we had

given MJ12, and that this information appeared to be solid based on decades of careful monitoring of the skies.

Following Roswell, as the story tells, we established a contact with the US government, which put this into the hands

of MJ12 to avoid information contamination of the normal federal bureaucracy. We were interested in the human

leadership of the world informing their public, so early on we made clear what was about to happen, in 2003 [Note: see

2003 Date explanation]. As the story of the Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 tell, the immediate reaction was to save a few skins.

When it became clear that they were likely to be on the surface of Earth during the next pole shift, they wanted

confirmation. Running away is relatively easy, as one is just suddenly absent. But if one must build a safe complex in

front of those one is lying to, this is more difficult. Thus, to secure cooperation among those they would have to enlist,

on Earth, they needed confirmation. MJ12, via NASA and JPL, had been monitoring the approach of Planet X,

according to our coordinates and predictions. This was proving accurate, so they mustered the IRAS search in the early

1980's which resulted in the find of what they hoped they would not find.

The human mind does not wish to entertain the awful, so most in this group were in denial, though going along with

the search as an interesting scientific exercise, not unlike most of the activity NASA et al undertake daily. The

discovery of solid proof so stunned most of those involved in the search that their guard was dropped, and thus the

reports such as the 1983 Washington Post front page article. Interest in Planet X was roaring along going into the 1983

IRAS search. Had Planet X not been found, interest might still be roaring along, in the media, that is. When the

blanket of suppression was dropped on the media and major observatories, who know just where Planet X is at all

times these days, it took some time for an explanation for the silence to be concocted. Thus one finds the strange

silence, that lasted almost a decade, following the Planet X discovery in 1983. Since JPL and NASA are firmly in

hand, doing the bidding of the establishment on so many information issues, they became the designated arm of the

explanation. The mystery of why the outer planets appeared perturbed to astronomers for the last 160 years was

explained away by adjustments in the size and composition of these outer planets discovered by probes. The public

gets the conclusion, but not the details, or they get the details in such a manner that an independent conclusion can't be

arrived at. All very safe.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s58.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:26 AM]

ZetaTalk: Planet X

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s58.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:26 AM]

ZetaTalk: Comet Orbit

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Comet Orbit

Note: written on Aug 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The 12th Planet's path is elliptical, making a long flat circle around its two gravitational masters, your Sun and a body

you cannot see. The Sun's alter ego in this matter is not an object on your sky maps, but for the purposes of calculating

the 12th Planet's orbit, you can assume it be have the same mass as the Sun, and to be at a distance that allows the

curve of the ellipse to smooth to an essentially straight line between the two orbital foci. The 12th Planet's travels are

not unlike a train on parallel tracks, where the train is on one side of the tracks going in one direction, and on the other

side coming back. It will surprise you to know that the second foci is not that far away. Since it rivals the Sun in mass, the assumption would be that your astronomers would know about it. However, being dark, they stare past it and think

it space. To use multiples of the distance from your Sun to its farthest known orbiting planet, which you call Pluto, this

foci is from the Sun 18.724 times as far away.

The elliptical path of the 12th Planet does little direct damage to the planets in your Solar System, which are lined up

on a plane with each other. The 12th Planet comes in on an angle, such that it is only the Point of Passage where a direct collision could occur. This point, at the present time, is not in the orbital path of any of your Solar System

planets, although that was not the case in the distant past as your Asteroid Belt attests. For this pole shift, we estimate

that the Earth will be on the same side as the 12th Planet, at approximately an 18 degree angle from where the 12th

Planet comes closest to the Sun. Its return is on the other side of the Sun, but for the Earth, hapless in this matter, this

may be an advantage or disadvantage depending on where the Earth is in its own orbit at the time. On the 12th Planet's

return voyage, during this passage, the Earth will be protected by the Sun from a full impact, but mild earthquakes and

heavy tides will recur at that time.

Having passed by the Sun, the 12th Planet now slows. The rate of slowing is dependent on two factors, essentially - its

speed and the fact that both its gravitational masters are now behind it. As fast as the 12th Planet picked up speed

approaching your Sun, it slows even faster, the nearness of your Sun behind it no small factor in this. Nevertheless, for

a traveling planet the size of the 12th Planet, putting on the brakes and turning about is no small matter. It must first

come to a stop, which it does in approximately 2 years 3 months after passing your Sun. The 12th Planet's orbit takes it

well away from the Sun after passage, so that it moves out a distance equal to 1/4 of the distance between the Sun and

its other foci before it slows to a stop. After passing through the Solar System, the 12th Planet moves out on the

opposite side some 3.560 times the distance from your Sun to its farthest planet, Pluto, then stops. It then hovers, not

moving, essentially, for 3 years 6 months, and then slowly begins a return trip which telescopes or mirrors the voyage

out.

There are no stars in the sighting line that can be used as a guide, but one need not grope about in the heavens for

guide posts when the best are within your own Solar System. Neither the 12th Planet's orbital plane or any axis placed

upon it at intersection points have identifiable stars directly on the plane or such an axis. It would be a bit to this side

or a bit to that side, and there we are again with imprecision. Let us suggest that a more satisfying approach would be

to use stabilizing points within your Solar System. The path of your Moon is well known and its orbit forms a plane as

it moves around your Earth. Even though your Moon circles the Earth and the Earth circles the Sun, the orbital planes

are at an angle to one another and thus the Moon's orbital plane consistently intersects the Earth's orbital plane at

opposing points twice a year. This will be stable until the cataclysms are upon you and thus can be used to triangulate

with other planes.

The Earth's orbit forms a plane. The Moon's orbit forms a plane that bisects the Earth's orbit in a fixed place twice a

year. The 12th Planet's orbit, coming and going, forms a plane that also bisects the Earth's orbital plane. The 12th

Planet's orbital plane can be calculated if points are taken on the other two planes and used as a reference. The Earth's

distance from the Sun is known. Take the placement of the Earth at the two points where the Moon's orbital plane lines

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s29.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:27 AM]

ZetaTalk: Comet Orbit

up. Use these two points as two of three points in a triangle. The third point in an equilateral triangle will be on the

plane of the 12th Planet's orbit. This third point is more stable than any point we could give you where you would be

looking out into space. Recall that the 12th Planet is lifting up and away from the Sun when it is this close, so will not

actually be at this third point as it approaches. However, for purposes of calculating the orbit in the heavens, this third point should be useful.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s29.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:27 AM]

ZetaTalk: Sling Orbit

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Sling Orbit

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The gravitational perturbation affecting the outer planets in your solar system is outside your solar system but affecting

all your planets steadily, and by more than a gravitational pull. There is confusion, in understanding the nature of the

Planet X eccentric orbit and the effect it and your Sun's dark binary twin have, because man is struggling to reconcile

this new information with existing astrophysics theories and the math formulas used to describe them. Somehow they

all must fit, and they don't. The problem lies with the theories and formulas, though few throw them aside as then they

feel adrift, without an anchor. The insecure slam shut the doors, close out new information, and develop the closed-

mind syndrome recently under discussion here on sci.astro. For those not closed minded, we will describe the eccentric

orbit of Planet X, between your Sun and its dark twin. This unlit binary sun lies some 18.74 times the distance from

your Sun to Pluto, at a 11 degree angle from the ecliptic, in the direction of the constellation of Orion. Though farther

away, twice the distance or more, from where Planet X rides at the moment, it is a large gravitational giant, and thus

between these two binaries Planet X is caught in a highly elliptical orbit. This orbit does not fit into man's astrophysics theories, and thus it cannot be described by the math used by man to describe comet or orbit behavior. Yet the orbit

makes sense, if one puts the dictates of man's current theories aside.

There is a desk-top toy composed of several metal balls hung in a line from a

wooden frame, which when set in motion causes the end balls to swing out, then

return to bump all the balls in the row until the ball on the opposite end swings

out in an equal manner, thence continuing until gravity wears the motion down to

a stop. This toy is a simple example that an object will stop, when "escaping" a

gravity pull, and return toward that gravity pull by reversing its course. That most

known planets or moons go around their gravitational giants is due to a

phenomena of gravity we have termed the Repulsion Force, though it is simply

gravity particles spurting out from large bodies such that they are kept apart like two fire hoses turned on one another.

Planet X, like the balls in the desk-top toy described, slings back and forth between its two gravitational foci, returning

on almost exactly the same path. Its momentum causes it to overshoot a focus, then like the balls in the toy, to return

on the same path after coming to a full stop. Why would it not do that, when both foci are directly behind it? This is

equivalent to the end ball in the toy, dropping back toward Earth due to gravity. When approaching one of its suns,

Planet X picks up speed, as the end ball does when dropping, and thus acts like a comet when coming through the solar

system. It shoots through the solar system, its speed causing it to bypass the sun. Once past, with both gravitational

pulls behind it, it stops, as the end ball in the toy does, and then returns on the same path, as the end ball does.

This is not a curved orbit, it is a sling orbit, and for those who would argue that such an orbit cannot exist, we would

point to the desk-top toy, where the end ball returns so precisely that it connects with the other balls in the toy line-up so that the motion repeats itself with only gravity bringing it to an eventual halt. The back and forth sling is a return

trip, as the toy demonstrates. The difference between Planet X and the desk-top toy is that the toy had its major gravity

pull in the center, bringing the motion to a stop, where Planet X has dual gravitaional pulls at the ends of its sling

orbit, which keeps the slinging motion going.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s106.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:27 AM]

ZetaTalk: Second Foci

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Second Foci

Note: written on Oct 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The Earth and the dark star that is the second foci of the 12th Planet's orbit do not rotate around each other any more

than the planets in your Solar System rotate around each other. The reason for the latter is that the Sun dominates the

planets, and their influence on each other becomes the lesser voice.

In like manner your Sun and this dark star, of a comparable size, are caught in a larger net and are essentially

motionless within your Galaxy. This net exists for all the stars in your Galaxy, as elsewhere, and is the reason the stars in the sky do not lose their position and float toward each other. It is not that they are so far apart that they do not

influence each other. Influence, however slight, is always there. It is rather that influences have been balanced to where

an equilibrium is reached. To you, who see that distance is maintained, it looks like the lack of influence. It is balanced

influence. Were you to have seen your galaxy born, clumping into masses with these masses first attracted and then to

some degree repulsed by each other, motion initiated as a result of these opposing forces, you would intuitively

understand that large bodies that cease motion do so not because there is no influence upon them and not because they were not at one time in motion, but because they came to a situation where they essentially are in a dither. The

influences upon them are balanced.

This second foci of the 12th Planet has not been located by your astronomers because it is dark, not lit, and does not

happen to block any view your astronomers are particularly interested in. They think it empty space. Unlike the Sun,

this dark twin never lit. Although comparable in size and mass, its composition was subtly different, and it has no

potential for becoming a lit sun under the present conditions in your part of the Universe. It has no planets of any size

to mention, though is orbited by a lot of trash. Should one wish to search for it, it stands at an angle of 11 degrees off

the Earth's orbital plane around the Sun, in the same direction we have given for the approach of the 12th Planet. Not

being a luminous body, and not giving off any radiation detectable by human devices, you will be unable to locate it,

but this does not mean that it is not there. Do you, like a child with his hands over his eyes, think that if you cannot see something that it does not exist?

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s36.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:28 AM]

ZetaTalk: Distance from Earth

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Distance from Earth

Note: written on Nov 15, 1999. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The 12th Planet is far closer than anyone would expect. Comet behavior is anticipated to follow the speed and route of the

dirty snowballs that humans call comets. These have a tiny mass compared to the mass of the 12th Planet, and thus engage

neither the gravity attraction or repulsion force interactions that the 12th Planet does with the Sun and surrounding planets.

Dirty snowballs are held at a distance by the solar wind alone, not the repulsion force, and thus the gravity pull differs little from their extra-solar placement and their placement within the solar system where they are visible to man. Their speed,

thus, barely increases during the course of their passage. The 12th Planet, on the other hand, heads straight toward the sun,

deflected not at all by the solar wind, and avoids a collision with the sun and the other planets only due to the repulsion

force incited by its approach. Thus, its speed increases as it is essentially plummeting into the sun!

The 12th Planet is circling on a long elliptical orbit around the sun and its dead companion which lies at a distance some

18.724 times the length from the sun to Pluto. It is not a long distance to be traveled in 3,657 years, especially considering

that it transverses the solar system in 3 short months [Note: see 2003 Date explanation, as it lingers near the Sun and does not speed past]!

Clearly, the uptick in speed is considerable, and the rate of speed as it floats from one binary sun to the other is sedate in

comparison. Thus, when the passage is due in 2003 [Note: see 2003 Date explanation], there is an exponential increase in speed during the last years, and this speeding up has already started. To compute the distance from the solar system on any given

date, create an exponential equation which takes into consideration the total distance we have given for the sun's dead

companion, the years the 12th Planet takes to make a complete ellipse (3,657), and the approximate May 15, 2003 date

[Note: see 2003 Date explanation] of the next passage. The distance will differ greatly, thus, depending upon the date.

At the turn of the millennium the 12th Planet is still close to the mid-point between the two foci, as astonishing as this may

seem. It spends the vast majority of its time in an essential dither these two massive suns, picking up speed as it

approaches, inbound, then zooming through, turning around after coming to a standstill after having overshot the solar

system, then shooting through again and returning to the essential dither point between the its two foci. What makes it

move and progress from one sun to the next? The fact that there is a slight momentum, and this is a slight momentum.

When the 12th Planet overshoots and goes to the far side of one of its suns, before it turns around and comes back on its

narrow track, it is vulnerable. This orbit is not what human astronomers might paint, as it is like a train track between the

two suns and slightly beyond, in each case. The 12th Planet is also vulnerable to the call of the wild when it lies between

the two suns, should the larger universe present something that would draw it away.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s100.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:29 AM]

ZetaTalk: Retrograde Orbit

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Retrograde Orbit

Note: written on Jan 15, 1997. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

As we have mentioned, the 12th Planet's approach at this time, as viewed from Earth, has it essentially standing still.

Just as the appearance of the flight of a bird might have it bobbling up or down at bit in flight, as it approaches the

observer, if viewed from above the flight the path would appear straight, and if viewed from the side where the rapid

forward progress of the bird is more dramatic than any bobble up or down due to its beating wings, the path would

likewise appear straight. This false illusion of motion when the observer is not at an angle that presents the true motion

of the object being viewed is especially true if the observer is also in motion. If the observer is running toward the

bird, rocking to the right and left in his running stride, the bobbling of the bird is compounded by the eyes-view of the

human runner so that it appears to be jiggling side to side too.

Astronomers are well aware that the apparent retrograde motion of the outer planets is in fact due to the more rapid

orbit of the Earth. Draw a line from the Sun through the Earth and on out to a planet such as Jupiter. Both are

revolving around the Sun in a counterclockwise manner as viewed from above the ecliptic, up above the North Pole.

Yet due to the faster motion of the Earth, Jupiter would appear to be to the left of the Earth, then to the right, and thus

appear to be moving left to right around the Sun, a clockwise motion. Bearing in mind that appearances can be

deceiving, and just why that is, the following is what humans can expect to observe as the 12th Planet approaches for

its periodic passage.

As we have mentioned, the path the 12th Planet takes between its two foci is like a train track, the path in one

direction lined like a straight line next to the path in the other direction. However, this direct path does not hold

when the giant nears one of its foci, passes, and turns around on the opposite side for the return trip.

The 12th Planet's Retrograde Orbit around the Sun is due to its reaction to an energy field emitted by the Sun.

This energy field radiates out from the Sun intensely at certain points, like a moving arm, following the rotation

of the Sun's core where the matter producing this energy field is located. Where the non-traveling planets are in

essence swept along before this intense energy field, like dust balls in front of a broom, the 12th Planet is not so

trapped.

Approaching from a distance, the 12th Planet reacts to this energy field by trying to evade it, and takes the path

of least resistance. Like children skipping rope, if one jumps toward the rope the passage of the rope happens

fastest. The sweeping arm of this energy field coming from the Sun passes by quickly out in space where the

12th Planet rides at a distance, but builds in intensity and takes longer to sweep past the closer the 12th Planet

comes.

When at a distance, this energy field affects the 12th Planet but slightly, so it reacts as it approaches from its

second foci on the near parallel orbit tracks that it travels upon when moving between its two foci by orbiting in

the same manner planets close to the Sun do. It sweeps before this energy field as the field passes, moving

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s85.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:29 AM]

ZetaTalk: Retrograde Orbit

slightly at these times to the left, in the same counterclockwise manner that the other planets do.

As the 12th Planet approaches, moving steadily closer and picking up speed due to the gravity tug of the Sun, the

energy field from the Sun is more intense and takes longer to sweep past. The 12th Planet's reaction to this is

still a slight movement sweeping ahead of this energy field, but as the energy field passes is then a stronger jerk

backwards, away from the passing arm of the Sun's energy field.

The backward reaction is due to the nature of the sweeping arm, like the cutting edge of a knife most intense at

the cutting edge of the arm, but with more bulk of the energy field trailing after the cutting edge. Thus, as the

sweeping arm of this energy field passes the 12th Planet, which in no way could stay ahead of this sweeping

arm at the distance it is from the Sun, the 12th Planet's reaction to the bulk of the energy field is longer lasting

and begins to produce a retrograde orbit for its approach to the Sun.

Thus, during 1995 through 1998, the 12th Planet will drift left and up toward the elliptic, aligning itself in the

same manner as the planets to the Sun's sweeping arm, but due to its mobility out in space, its distance from the

Sun, it develops a retrograde orbit and begins to move to the right, in the manner the ancients recorded.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s85.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:29 AM]

ZetaTalk: Entry Angle

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Entry Angle

Note: written on Aug 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

While it is out in space the 12th Planet moves slowly, but increases speed rapidly as it comes close to one of its two

foci. When the 12th Planet is passing your Sun it is moving rapidly, the time spent within your outer planet Saturn's

orbit a mere 3 months [Note: see 2003 Date explanation]. It zips by.

It does not head directly into the Sun, as there is a play between attraction and repulsion which exists between all

planetary bodies. The distance maintained is determined by these forces, relative to the mass and speed of the two

objects - your Sun and the passing 12th Planet. All comets tracked do not have a mass sufficient to trigger a strong

repulsion force in the planets they pass or the Sun, and thus the humans ephemeris assume the only elements to

consider are the path and the speed. For a tiny comet, if the path is such that it brings the comet too close to a planet,

there is a collision, as the repulsive force generated in a planet is not strong enough to repulse a tiny comet. Thus

comet orbits assume that the comet is simply slinging toward the Solar System, and this math works due to their

relatively tiny size. Humans assume that if on the initial orbit into the Solar System the result was such that the tiny

comet headed into the Sun, they did not become a regular visitor, a returning comet. However, in the case of the 12th

Planet, which has a mass much greater than the Earth, the repulsion force is a factor. Mathematically this is equal to

the force of gravity when the two objects are close enough to touch, or they would in fact touch.

Simply stated, the faster the 12th Planet moves, the closer it can come, although the math in this matter is not quite that

simple. Where it would seem that the 12th Planet is coming dead on, and in fact month after month and even year after

year would be found in approximately the same place in the skies, nevertheless, as it approaches your Solar System,

things change. The 12th Planet is both attracted and repulsed by your Sun. Why is it that comets do not just head for

the Sun, and there stop? This is not a one-way issue. Both factors are at play. Thus, as the 12th Planet approaches your

Sun, it picks up speed but also shies away. There is a battle going on, a tug in one direction with a push in another. The

end result is that the 12th Planet still comes on, full bore, but veers to the side a bit as it approaches. As it is still

picking up speed, the speed compensates for the repulsion, and the 12th Planet finds in the last few months that it can

now come closer to the Sun, the repulsion being balanced by the speed.

Thus, when it gets to its maximum speed, entering your Solar System, it bends in toward your Sun, after having veered

outward slightly, so that the angle is approximately 32 degrees. This angle can vary slightly depending on influences

upon the 12th Planet in its long journey away from your Sun. For this passage, the 12th Planet's first pass will be at a

time when the Earth is on the same side of the Sun as the 12th Planet's point of passage, but toward the rear of the Sun.

Thus the 12th Planet will come into the Earth's orbital plane not directly between the Earth and the Sun, but forward,

somewhat closer to the 12th Planet's approach. When one is looking toward Orion, at this time, from above the Earth's

orbital plane, the perspective human astronomers prefer, the Sun will be to the right. The Earth, Sun, and 12th Planet

will thus Form a Triangle in the Earth's orbital plane with a 23 degree angle at the Earth, an 18 degree angle at the Sun, and a 139 degree angle at the 12th Planet. It is at this point, essentially, that the 12th Planet is closest to the Earth, as

with the angle of entry into the Earth's orbital plane being 32 degrees at this point, the 12th Planet essentially dives up

through the Earth's orbital plane and quickly passes on.

The 12th Planet pulls down and away from your Sun only at the last minute. This is reflected in time as the last 9.7

weeks or 68 days [Note: see 2003 Date explanation]. This is reflected in distance as 1.2598 times the orbital diameter of Pluto, or two and one-half times the distance from your Sun to this farthest known planet which you call Pluto. The

shape of the deviation is parabolic at the angle of turns, in all cases. This is not exact, but for purposes of calculating

an orbit is something you can work with that will be close enough. Thus, the 12th Planet starts its deviation from its

straight path in a parabolic manner, but has scarcely started to turn away when its increasing speed allows it to come

closer to the Sun and it does another parabolic curve back toward the Sun, essentially correcting its path again to be

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s31.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:30 AM]

ZetaTalk: Entry Angle

straight toward the Sun. When it passes the Sun, piercing the Earth's orbital plane, it has come to the point in a

parabolic curve where the line is essentially straight.

The distance of deviation from the orbital line, which is essentially a straight line toward the Sun on the approach, is

not great, approximately 37 million miles. This relatively slight distance is enough to grant the 12th Planet the sharper

angle it seeks. At this point the orbit of the 12th Planet has been altered, as the Sun is the only giant it is listening to.

The 12th Planet maintains this line of orbit as it leaves the Solar System and travels out. In the scheme of things, this

puts a slight lift in the orbit, as though the orbit between the two foci were your arm, extended out from your body,

and the part of the orbit past the Sun were your hand. If you lifted your hand at the wrist slightly, a 21 degree lift, you

would simulate what the 12th Planet's orbit is doing at this point. The 12th Planet maintains this deviation until it again

passes your Sun, the second pass. It does not find it necessary to pull away from the Sun on this second pass, as the

angle is correct to begin with.

It should be understood that the reason for the deviation in the first place is that the other planets in the Earth's orbital

plane are also entering into the equation. The 12th Planet in essence pulls away from this orbital plane, as well as from

the Sun. It does not want to move in along side the other planets, it wants to cross quickly at a sharper angle. Thus, the

return orbit is comfortable in this regard. Having passed the Sun again on the second pass, and moving far enough

from the Sun and the planets in the orbital plane to feel free of their influence, the 12th Planet again begins to listen to

the second foci. Thus, it again makes a parabolic curve to head straight toward the second foci. Here the 12th Planet is

somewhat further from the Sun than the measurement we have mentioned for the approach, as the second foci is

farther away and has less influence at this point.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s31.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:30 AM]

ZetaTalk: Conflict

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Conflict

Note: written on Nov 15, 2001. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

As in many approach/repulsion dynamics in nature, the passage of the 12th Planet through the solar system has many

factors at play, at once. In psychology, there are approach/approach conflicts, where an individual is pulled in two

directions at once, both equally attractive, and becomes paralyzed. There are likewise avoidance/avoidance conflicts,

where an individual is caught between two situations he would like to avoid, and likewise becomes paralyzed. A third

conflict is approach/avoidance, where an individual is both attracted to approach and trying to avoid a situation, and

thus dithers or moves slowly in a direction. The 12th Planet is caught, not because of psychology but because of

gravitational and magnetic aspects, in an approach/avoidance conflict with the Sun. Thus:

When the 12th Planet rides mid-way between its two foci, the Sun and its dead twin some 18.74 Sun-Pluto distances

away, it is in an approach/approach situation, and barely moves during the majority of its 3,657 year cycle.

When it is within a few years of a passage of one of its foci, breaking from its mid-point position and picking up speed

in an approach of one of these two suns, it increasingly becomes a non-conflict situation, approach only, as the 12th

Planet is pulled by the gravity of the sun it is closest to, yet far enough away from that sun that a repulsion force has

not yet come into play. It picks up speed, this speed adding momentum, in a virtual straight line approach.

When the 12th Planet nears one of its foci, the repulsion force comes into play. There are other factors that influence

close contact between large bodies, but the repulsion force is dominant. The 12th Planet slows, increasingly, as what

we have described as a fire-hose of gravity particles from both the Sun and the 12th Planet are pointed at each other,

butting into each other and pushing the gravity giants away from each other. This is a minor factor at first, reducing

the increasing speed of approach. Then it reaches the point where the approach is actually diminishing, losing

momentum gained before.

The 12th Planet deals with this situation by sliding sideways, away from the main point of these gravity particle spurts,

which occur at the Sun's belly, the Plane of the Ecliptic. It dives south, still approaching as it continues to be attracted

due to gravity. That it pierces the Plane of the Ecliptic, rather that skidding along the southern part of the Sun, is due

to taking the path of least resistance. During the 3 months it takes the 12th Planet to traverse the solar system from one

side of Saturn's orbit to the other, it has placed itself on a line some 32 degrees below the Ecliptic due to its slide

sideways to avoid the repulsion force.

Its angle of approach is still from south to north, the dictates of inertia and momentum stating it would continue in this direction. As this line of approach brings the 12th Planet into conflict with increasingly strong gravity spurts along the

Ecliptic, it must both turn into these spurts to turn south, as well as slow its forward momentum, so the path of least

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s119.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:31 AM]

ZetaTalk: Conflict

resistance is to move north, past a given spurt, for avoidance. Thus, it crosses the Ecliptic, jerking northward during

each encounter with a spurt, while still moving toward the Sun in general due to gravity.

The overall effect is for a rapid pace toward the sun in the last months, with a dive southward and a slowing in the last

weeks, with an even slower passage as it crosses the Ecliptic in the week of passage. It seems, almost, to hover in the

sky as it crosses between the Earth and Sun, moving slowly as the horrified populace watches.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s119.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:31 AM]

ZetaTalk: Speed

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Speed

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Expanded with Light Speed Limitation section during IRC Session. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Speed, in space, is a relative thing. Your submarines move more slowly than your cars because they deal with less

drag. Likewise, objects shot into space or incoming feel little distress when out where the atmosphere is negligible, and

tend to heat up and burn when in the thick of Earth's atmosphere. Thus, objects in space have no ill effects from a high

speed, other than what they might encounter. What might that be, in the case of Planet X, which we have described as

traversing the solar system from one side of Saturn's orbit to the other in 3 short months [Note: see 2003 Date explanation, as this was part of the May 15, 2003 white lie].

Gravity Draw from the Sun

Human scientists who deal with gravity as some mysterious "force", unexplained except by the math that

describes it, would be boggled by the path of Planet X we have described. An object comes on, and depending

upon its speed it will either pass by a gravity draw, with an "escape velosity", or be drawn in to crash,

ultimately, on the surface of the gravity draw or into some sort of circular or eliptical orbit. So the theory goes.

Apply the particle explanation to the force of gravity, as we have described it, and you have another scenario,

which by the way explains why your Moon remains up there when according to Newton it should not. Planet X

is, of course, drawn by the gravity pull of the Sun, and thus its periodic passage. But it is also pushed away by

the gravity particle streams emitted by the Sun, which can be described as a fire hose of force, meeting the fire

hose of force from Planet X itself. They buffer away from each other, forcing the speeding Planet X to bypass

the Sun, at a distance based on its mass and the mass of the Sun. The reducing mass of the Sun explains why

Planet X is coming closer, during its passage, at the present time, than its past passage which were through the

Asteroid Belt.

Perturbations from Earth or Other Planets

This is a variable that depends on speed as well as mass. By the time Planet X enters the solar system, its speed

toward the Sun ensure that it will move past any other planet, including Jupiter, that it may come close to.

Should Jupiter stand directly in the path of Planet X during a passage, this would case a perturbation on other

planets that would temporarily change their paths, but they would both resume essentially the same orbit or path

after the encounter. The speed of Planet X ensures this, as does the significant mass of both these planets. Were

Planet X to encounter a smaller object, such as occurred in the Asteroid Belt in the past, it would either be

treated like a meteor or if large enough to engage the Repulsion Force of gravity, become a moon satellite of

Planet X as many objects have. The pelting to pieces that occured in the Asteroid Belt was due to collisions of

objects not of significant size to invoke the Repulsion Force. Small planets, passing close to Planet X during its

high-speed passage, might become a satellite moon, or be pelted to pieces by one of Planet X's trailing moons,

though this has by change not occurred except in the heavily crowded Asteroid Belt, which contained some 24

planets and various moons of same prior to the past passages.

Solar Wind

The effect on Planet X is, as with meteors entering your atmosphere, peripheral, so that the outer edges of the

atmosphere are altered, peeled off in the worst case, and need to be rebuilt from the oceans that cover most of

Planet X. This same atmosphere rebuilding occurs after the passage on Earth, from its oceans, as we have

described. Temporarily, the clouds are lower on Earth, but the adjustment is remarkably quick, so that survivors

are unaware of anything other than a lower cloud cover during the first few months.

Light Speed Limitations

In the dozen or so years prior to a passage, Planet X speeds up from almost a standstill to a zoom, toward the

foci it is approaching. Imagine the Earth without atmosphere, and a rock some miles overhead. What is the speed

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s112.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:31 AM]

ZetaTalk: Speed

limit on this rock as it plummets? There is no limit in space, only that which mankind assumes. During math

discussions on sci.astro, it has been surmised that the speed of Planet X approaches the speed of light during its

most rapid approach, and this astonishes those in the discussion. Why is it assumed that light is the fastest thing

in the universe, re travel? Man thinks this because it is something he can measure. He is aware of such a small

percentage of matter and energy about him that to say that he comprehends 1% of what the universe is

composed of would be an overstatement. Our space travel, in 4th Density and even 3rd Density, is faster than

light, and we do not melt. Man does not understand, so we cannot give him satisfaction in our explanations.

Suffice it to say that our explanation is correct, and Planet X travels rapidly into our midst, thence the Repulsion

Force is invoked, thence it floats past between the Earth and Sun.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s112.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:31 AM]

ZetaTalk: Slowing Influences

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Slowing Influences

Note: written during the May 18, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC session. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Journeys are seldom unimpeded. A speeding train finds it slows going around a turn, due to increased friction against

the outer track, and picks up speed going downhill due to gravity assist. A speeding bullet loses speed going against

the air it must pass through. Light rays passing through water get bend between the source and the eye, this diversion

slowing the rate of passage slightly. Even in a vacuum, a moving particle is affected by gravity or magnetic influences

nearby. What does Planet X encounter during a passage, that changes its rate of speed? Where human math, using our

statements as a guide, has attempted to pinpoint the location of Planet X during the months preceding the shift, the

distance and speed cannot be computed steadily, as Planet X deals with more than the gravity pull of the Sun and the

Repulsion Force invoked as it nears the Sun, during its passage. Where the human math attempts are a reasonable

guideline, here is where it must be adjusted for deviation.

Particle Flows

Mankind is aware, only vaguely, of the particle flows that move in and out of the Sun. They sense what they

term the Solar Wind because of the behavior of comet tails. They sense a magnetic press because the Earth’s

magnetosphere is pressed outward from the Sun. They sense the truth in our statement that the Ecliptic is caused

by the planets, held away from the Sun by the Repulsion Force, are bobbling in a backwash of particles moving

back into the Sun. Why else does the Ecliptic exist? But mankind is aware of less than 1% of the possible

particle flows, and is thus unaware of what Planet X might encounter on its journey. Not all particles emit from

the poles of a rotating planet, re-entering at the waist. Were this to be the case, the pathways for particle flows

would be crowded, and some avoid each other or seek a less crowded path. Thus, Planet X encounters particles

flowing outward as it approaches, in increasing density as it draws closer to the Sun, and this is a slowing

influence.

Repulsion Force

We have described the Repulsion Force as being invoked late, only when two gravity giants come close enough

for their laser blasts of gravity particles to encounter each other, like two fire hoses of water pointed at each

other, essentially holding them apart. For the inbound Planet X, the force of gravity, impelling an approach,

increases as the flood of gravity particles returning to the Sun presses against the back side of Planet X

increases. This is essentially exponential, an inverse square rate per man, as the number of returning particles

becomes rapidly more dense the closer one comes to the Sun. But likewise the Repulsion Force increases, not

due to any increase in the firehose of outbound gravity particles from Planet X, which remains steady, but due to

the outbound bursts of gravity particles from the Sun becoming dense enough, at distances increasingly

encountered by the approaching Planet X, to invoke a Repulsion Force of sorts, even when Planet X is afar. This

is a drag on the inbound speed, a slowing influence.

Crowded Ecliptic

We have stated that Planet X dives below the Ecliptic, when close to passage, to avoid the other planets in the

Ecliptic. Like the wind buffeting that cars passing large trucks on the highway encounter, the other planets in the

Ecliptic create particle flows from the side, as well as backwards, against the inbound Planet X. This roiling

encounters other roiling, all of which causes movement to from side to side as well as the forward motion

toward the Sun, a delaying action, slowing the speed.

Thus, when moving from the mid-point of its orbit between its two foci, the Sun and its dark twin some 18.74 Sun-

Pluto distances away, the speed of passage is:

at first slow as the gravity particles pulling it toward the Sun are scarcely more than the gravity particles pulling

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s126.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:32 AM]

ZetaTalk: Slowing Influences

it toward the dark twin

exponentially faster as the gravity particles increase at this rate the closer Planet X gets to the Sun

without impediment when afar from the solar system as represented by the planets orbiting the Sun, alone

increasing in essence at an exponential speed when approaching this solar system complex but the speed

increase somewhat reduced in the 6 months before passage by the start of the Repulsion Force influence and

particle flows or other crowding and buffeting influences

decreased dramatically at about the orbit of Mars by the braking action of the Repulsion Force, at last strong

enough to counter the inbound plunge toward the Sun

slow to a floating rate so that it floats past the Earth during the week of rotation stoppage, which is the point it is

also floating past the Sun, rather than zoom past

increase in speed to leave the inner solar system as the laser blasts of gravity particles coming from the Sun

added to the momentum past the Sun already in place combine to speed it on its way.

The speed at which Planet X floats past the Earth is much faster than the rate the Earth travels in her orbit. Planet X

will be millions of miles from the Earth, not quite halfway between the Earth and Sun. Where the speed of Planet X is

suffient to move it from one side of Saturn's orbit to the other in 3 short months, it slows while close to the Sun. This is

akin to the braking action a large truck barreling down the highway would have to do to maneuver a curve.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s126.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:32 AM]

ZetaTalk: Esape Velocity

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Escape Velosity

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Mankind is not oriented with how fast objects can travel in space. They are held to the concept of speed on the surface

of Earth, where friction is a factor. When traveling on the surface, there is drag from the atmosphere or from water, so

there is a finite speed attainable. When leaving the surface, an object is fighting gravity, a struggle. And when trying

to get to Mars or the other planets, for a peek, a probe is propelled by jets and a limited amount of fuel, so does not

attain speed. But in all these cases there is either:

1. friction or drag,

2. lack of impetus.

Mankind sees the planets floating about in their orbits and think this the speed that planets attain. But space does not

offer friction or drag, so this element is utterly missing. And when there are large objects gravitationally attracted to

each other, no jets or fuel supplies need be a limiting factor. Thus, when approaching the Sun, in a direct line that has

not had the Repulsion Force invoked as yet, Planet X has no brakes. How fast is fast? During the passage, it has not achieved the maximum speed that such a traveling world might. It has just started to step on the gas.

Planet X likewise escapes the Sun's gravity to overshoot the solar system to the point of turnaround and return not by

great speed, as in what is termed Escape Velocity, but because of the Repulsion Force. The Replusion Force comes

into place during the approach when Planet X turns to upsweep through the solar system. It is dropping now from 11

degrees to 32 degrees to avoid the outer planets, and this is to some degree a Repulsion Force event. But this

interchange with the Sun does not occur until it reaches Saturn's orbit, and really charges through. At that time, it is in

a straight line through the solar system, this path chosen as a compromise between the atraction and repulsion,

essentially. So one could say during the 3 month dash through the solar system that Repulsion Force with the Sun is in

play. This does not slow the passage, but hurries it past.

Strong effects of Planet X are felt for some decades prior to the passage, reaching an extreme point at passage, and

remain troubling during the turnaround and return, and then dimminish. The Jewish Exodus described a 7 year period

of weather and crop problems, and this is now. Then the passage. Then there is a 7 year turnaround and return. Then

another 7 years as the planet is outbound. In all of this, humans have a rough estimate of the attraction force of gravity,

but don't deal with speed. This is where the concept is new to mankind. Unless this Repulsion Force, which has been

proven to exist with the Moon, on sci.astro debates, is taken into consideration, it boggles mankind. But if this is

considered, our description makes sense. We would suggest that those who find this a puzzling spend less time trying

to reconcile mankinds theories of how things work and more time applying them to the Moon issue, which gets

evaded. Once they have faced the fact that the Moon is too large, and moving too slowly, to be up there per Newton,

then they will have cleared their minds for some real thinking.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s124.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:32 AM]

ZetaTalk: Second Pass

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Second Pass

Note: written on Oct 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The return passage of the 12th Planet is dictated by a combination of forces - momentum, attraction, and (for want of a

more scientific term to describe this process) the call of the wild. The 12th Planet has stopped, and hovers for some

years before beginning its return passage. The rate of startup essentially mirrors the rate of stoppage, so movement is

slow at first, almost imperceptible.

During its first passage the 12th Planet had been moving already, and the factor of momentum allowed it to accelerate

an already existing rate of speed when boring in on the Solar System. Where space does not have much matter to

create resistance to motion, momentum is in and of itself a factor. Why does a ball in a track on a straight-away

continue to roll after the initial push? What keeps it rolling? Momentum, which in fact is an interplay between the

attraction and repulsion forces of bodies around the object in motion, is a factor in its own right. Momentum is what

causes the planets to orbit, perpetually, and the Earth to rotate, perpetually. Thus, the 12th Planet's return requires that

it again build momentum, which it does not do to a comparable degree until it is inside the Solar System again and

well into the net of gravitational attraction that the Sun presents. The return passage thus finds the 12th Planet more

sedate in its approach but nearly equivalent in the speed of its passage through the Solar System, which is dictated

more by the relative size of the Sun and the 12th Planet than any other factors.

The 12th Planet hovers for the length of time it does before returning because of what we will term the call of the wild.

Having stopped in its tracks the 12th Planet is in a vulnerable position, and in point of fact could become caught in a

new pattern of motion should the objects around it present a new dynamic. It has stopped, dead still, and thus is in a

virginal position of having no commitments. During most passages of the 12th Planet there is no contest, but in some

cases there are other attractions nearby that create confusion. The upshot of this is that the 12th Planet may delay

longer before setting out on its return passage, but the factors in your part of the Universe are not such as to change the outcome.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s35.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:33 AM]

ZetaTalk: 12th Planet Glow

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: 12th Planet Glow

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Humans are aware of heat and light being produced together - fire, the Sun, and elements heated until they glow.

Humans are also aware of light being produced without heat, as with fireflies or minerals that are phosphorescent. And

of course, there is heat without light, close at hand as in 98.6 degrees. The 12th Planet has both heat and light,

generated from within its core. Life on the 12th Planet, which is inhabited by a large hominoid indistinguishable from

humans other than by its size, experiences continuous day. Life that has evolved there does not sleep, but rests. The

light is diffused in the atmosphere, and returns to the land surface, but emerges from the core to interact with the

atmosphere only via the surface of the deep oceans, which cover the majority of the planet's surface. You may equate

this to volcanic activity, where the Earth has numerous places both above ground and under the oceans that ooze

molten lava. Just so the 12th Planet has places where the molten and churning substance in its core escapes to the

surface.

Fires such as go on in the center of suns do not only proceed full bore. Why would they? Do you not have a fire within

you that is maintained at a steady temperature? Do you not find that the fire in your fireplace can be slowed by

adjusting the damper? Humans do not understand what is occurring within the Sun, a combustion of sorts that ignited

because of the pressure of elements following the big bang, during the congealing period. The Sun was not born, lit. It

lit as compression continued to the point where a product of subatomic particle collision did not dissipate, but

accumulated, and the degradation of this substance is what you are viewing and feeling in your sunlight. This is a

simplistic explanation for a complicated process. The 12th Planet has a similar process ongoing within its core, but

being composed of heavier substances than your Sun, this process is slowed. You can equate this to mixing medicine

into food, rather than taking it directly. This is tolerated because the incident or rate of medicine reacting with a taste

bud is reduced, or slowed.

On the 12th Planet, the heat released diffuses in all directions, so the surface of the planet is warm but not hot. Your

feet would not blister, but they may feel cool in places where the rock strata do not provide a good passage for heat,

should you visit that planet. Light only escapes the core where what is essentially volcanic activity under the water

occurs. Of course, this would occur if there was volcanic activity on the land surface of the planet, but there is little

land surface, and this long ago hardened. Volcanic activity would not be on the surface of the Earth, either, should her

proportion of water to land be increased. Water is pooling in the low spots, and the low spots have less hardened

surface mantle as a barrier. Thin places break, and give release to the pressure from the churning molten core. The

oceans of the 12th Planet, therefore, have places where diffused light is rising, and other places where the oceans

would appear to you much as your own do here on Earth.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s22.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:34 AM]

ZetaTalk: Brown Dwarf

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Brown Dwarf

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates .

Of course your laws of physics work well enough when applied to the situation they were designed to describe. They

didn't start out that way, as the flat earth theories that held sway in the past clearly demonstrate. People were assumed

to have developed disease due to demons casting spells, and the demonstrated relationship between passing germs

from the dirty hands of a physician from one patient to another was resisted by the establishment just as dropping the

flat earth theory was resisted. Comfortable theories are clung to, for no other reason than change, being open to change,

requires a momentary discomfort. The theories you smugly pronounce are correct were not the theories you smuggly

pronounced as correct yesterday, but that doesn't stop you from making such pronouncements.

Your theory about brown dwarfs exists based on those dwarfs you have observed, wherein they had to be large in order to be observed. Is it not possible for there to be something out there that you have not observed? A composition of a planet not quite in the mix you find in your Solar System, as you know it to be? You operate a slow burn in your

nuclear power plants, which otherwise would be the fast burn of a nuclear explosion that occurs when no braking

mechanism is in place. Is it entirely impossible for suns to have mixed composition? For a slow burn to be in place?

For a planet to have some of the composition of a sun as well as a composition of a solid planet? This is simply not

possible, and because you have not observed it, then it does not exist?

Please spare us your current theories about what makes sun's burn, as you have no more proof of that than you do what

the composition of the core of your very own planet or a proper description of the workings of the atoms you yourself

are composed of. Your current theories are a work in process, and if you are honest you will admit that.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s130.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:34 AM]

ZetaTalk: Red Planet

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Red Planet

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

If Planet X is primarily a water planet, then why would it appear to be a red planet, as Mars, which is virtually devoid

of water on its surface? Why would it not, as the Earth, appear to be a blue planet? The explanation lies in the space

trash Planet X has gathered not only traversing back and forth between its two foci but also from the Asteroid Belt

during the pelting process where the planets that rode there were destroyed during various passages of Planet X. Early

in its life, Planet X gathered moons about it as do most large planets, and these moons trail behind it during a rapid

transit. In the past, when the Sun had more mass and the Repulsion Force between the Sun and Planet X was greater,

Planet X traversed the solar system in the Asteroid belt, and the trailing moons, lashing from side to side, pelted small

planets and moon which themselves became missiles of death. During these repeated passages, then, Planet X and its

moons had opportunity to gather space trash, and being a magnetic planet, Planet X would be particularly attractive to

iron dust.

Why does this dust not settle into the atmosphere of Planet X, and drift down into the ocean and cease to be a cloud

giving Planet X a reddish appearance? Given a static environment, this would eventually be the case, but Planet X is

not static, it's perpetually on the move. The dust cloud is far outside what would be termed the atmosphere of Planet X,

so that during the passage through the solar system, it streams behind Planet X to become a long tail of red dust,

oxidized iron, which during a close passage to Earth, when Earth is caught in the tail, causes rivers and ponds to

temporarily turn a blood red color and assume a bitter taste. To those peering at Planet X from Earth, its appearance is

always blood red, due to this cloud. In that the iron dust does not itself emit light, the reddish appearance of Planet X

comes from the light the planet emits, passed through the red dust. When Planet X is close enough to reflect sunlight,

the light must likewise bounces off the ocean surface and must pass through the red dust to return to those peering at it from Earth.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s107.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:35 AM]

ZetaTalk: Swirling Moons

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Swirling Moons

Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

Where spin on the surface of a planet is dictated by the moving core of the planet, pulling or pushing on an object free

to move on the surface, spin in space is dictated by whatever the spinning object is bound to. This is not explored by

man, who strives to move directly in space and treats any spin in an object under their control as a problem to be

corrected promptly, as in "the probe has developed a spin and is threatening to spin out of control". The reasons for the spin having developed in the first place is treated as an irrelevancy, and the only issue whether or not the probe is

under control. The spin is suppressed by the little jets that allow man to control his probes when their trajectory needs

to be corrected, and this thus allows mankind to feel smug about his knowledge of how things work. The moons of

Planet X, which trail it like a string of pearls out in space, have no such little jets, so nature, not man, rules, and the

full result of a spin out in space can be observed. Why do the moons trail, and spin in a slow whirlwind behind Planet

X, rather than orbit the planet?

Moons in orbit around planets in a relatively circular orbit around a sun have more than their planet affecting their

behavior. They are of a mass that prevents their plummeting to the planet, as they are evoking the gravitational

repulsion force between themselves and their planet. They are moving, not stationary, not because of the attraction to

the planet, which is at a standstill, but because of attractions to other elements in the solar system. Like a liquid core of

a rotating body, they are moving toward what attracts them, overshooting the point where they are closest to the

attractant, moving around to the far point because of momentum, and proceeding to approach the attractant again.

Where there are a number of moons orbiting a planet, they position themselves like the planets around a sun, at a

comfortable distance from each other to avoid collision, as the repulsion force is in operation between the moons,

which are of relatively equal size, too.

Where it would seems that an orbit, in an orbital plane, around a sun or an planet is the natural outcome, this is

disrupted during the swift passage that Planet X makes past one of its foci, the sun or its dead twin some 18.74 Sun-

Pluto lengths away. Planet X moves away from its moons, pulling forward with increasing speed, at the same time that

it is passing one of its suns and any planets that are orbiting that sun. The moons have conflicting dictates.

Their primary allegiance is to Planet X, due to the flow of gravity particles which force it toward Planet X,

which they are thus bound to. They are thus trying to catch up to Planet X, even when Planet X leaves them

behind.

The secondary influence over the moons is momentum, which continues to cause them to overshoot a reach for

an attractant in the vicinity, to return to the far point of their spin whence they start back again toward the

attractant. Thus, they continue the rotation or orbit pattern, even when not in a tight orbit around their planet.

The third influence, which comes to interfere with a return to a tight orbit around Planet X, is each other. Moons

around a planet that does not move rapidly away from its moons have established their positions in part because

the moons arrive one at a time! Each new arrival finds an orbit plane taken, and assumes another or displaces the

first, but the factors that dictate position are more static than moons traveling behind a rapidly moving planet. In

essence, the positions are determined because one moon says "I am larger than you, and I wish this position of

closeness to the planet, so you have to move."

Moons that have arrived in a whirlwind behind a rapidly traveling planet have a new dictate to deal with, in that they

find other moons directly in the path they wish to take toward their gravitational giant, in this case Planet X. They are trying to catch the planet, while caught in momentum that their circular chase toward other attractants in the vicinity

has created, but during their approach to their planet they find other moons in the way and this causes a fourth dictate, a bump away from their traveling planet.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s123.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:35 AM]

ZetaTalk: Swirling Moons

In moons around a static or slowly orbiting planet, the moons have opportunity to snug closer to the planet when

competing moons are on the opposite side of the planet. When such moons encounter each other, having

assumed the same orbital plane, the smaller gets bumped out of the path of the larger, either below the path of

the larger moon, or most often farther away from the planet.

In moons that have found themselves trailing their planet, this bumping takes the form of increased circular

motion. The moons are already moving in a circular path, caused as we have mentioned by attractants in the

vicinity which they are chasing toward and overshooting while still bound to their gravitational master. The

swirling is increased as each time a larger moon attempts to approach its planet, it encounters other moons

directly in its path which have nowhere to go but round and round, so they go faster. Collisions are avoided by

more rapid motion, and none of the moons can place themselves on the opposite side of the planet. They are all

stuck in a corridor behind the planet, not able to leave, not able to pass each other, and not able to catch the

planet to reinstated a circular orbit around it.

Why would such a moon pattern perpetuate itself? Does Planet X not come to a virtual stop at the mid-point between

its two foci? Having established a swirl behind the planet, the moons have two factors preventing a return to the

normal orbital pattern of moons around a planet. First, their swirl perpetuates itself. The speed is dictated not only by

the normal rotation around a gravitational master that attractants in the vicinity would create, it is dictated by the need

to move away from the other moons in the swirl. Second, the larger moons in the cluster are perpetually trying to reach

a closer proximity to their planet, the point where the repulsion force between the moon and its planet creates a

stalemate. Being the larger moons, they push smaller moons away from their path, but this pushing action, in space,

has the effect of causing them both to move, thus not only increasing and perpetuating their swirling motion, but also

pushing the larger moon away from the planet it seeks to come closer to.

Thus, the moons of Planet X, having assumed a swirl that

perpetuates itself, remain in a dance behind Planet X even during

its dither point between its two foci. Planet X moves, however

slowly, at its dither point, so the swirl is always positioned between

Planet X and the foci it is leaving. This swirl, unique to man in any

comets or planets it observes, is what caused the ancients to call

the passing monster, red in the sky because of its illuminated red dust cloud, a dragon, lashing its tail, the swirl of

moons.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s123.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:35 AM]

ZetaTalk: Surging Magma

ZetaTalk: Surging Magma

written May 30, 2003

Leading into rotation stoppage, the Earth comes increasingly into the grip, magnetic primarily, of the approaching

Planet X, riding up from 32 degrees below the Ecliptic at a sharp angle so as to pierce the Ecliptic quickly and thus

avoid the backwash of particle flows that the Ecliptic represents. Where it’s approach from afar resulted in a lineal

increase in earthquake frequency and strength, and a lineal increase in erratic weather, and a lineal increased in polar

and glacier melt, at the point where it is rising from the 32 degree angle and floating to the Point of Passage there are dramatic and rapidly changes. These are best understood if both the Earth and Planet X are viewed as the large

magnets they are. Both are aligned with the Sun, and as analysis of the Planetary Alignment (usenet) within the solar system has relayed:

Where planets with strong magnetic fields, such as the Earth and Mercury, are far enough distant from one

another to simply line up with the Sun’s orientation, they do so.

Where gaseous planets, such as Jupiter and Neptune, do not have cores that are strong magnets, they act a

conduits for a return of the magnetic field to the Sun’s South Pole, and thus are in reverse of the Sun’s

orientation.

Where small planets, such as Pluto, are caught in the confusion of such a backwash, though they have a

magnetic field themselves, they position themselves to the closest influence.

The Earth and Planet X are both aligned with the sun, but not positioned side to side, and not positioned exactly end to

end, as Planet X has assumed a retrograde orbit, and thus is moving diagonally toward Earth from below and to the

side. What is that doing to the Earth?

At first, magnetic diffusion increases, where swirling about of magnetized magma causes local and temporary

magnetic orientation variance. Thus, for many decades as Planet X began it’s approach and increasingly as it

zoomed into the solar system, magnetic diffusion was increasing.

Then the crust itself begins to participate as the highly magnetized Atlantic Rift is under pressure to remain

aligned with Planet X, and not create a greater distance by going round the bend at dusk or staying at a distance

at dawn. Thus, we saw the dramatic double Global Quakes occurring on May 26 at the dawn and dusk points.

With both the core and crust resisting this alignment and any weak points in the crust having adjusted on May

26 this pattern did Not Repeat on May 27.

By May 28, as the Atlantic Rift passed the closest Alignment Point facing Planet X stress was evident, but other

changes were in play.

Where the crust resists, having many alignment responsibilities outside of the magnetic, and the core resists,

having established rotation for many reasons and wanting to continue apace, the liquid magma has more

freedom. Thus, by May 29 a distinct surging of parts of this liquid magma from one pole to the other was

evident, the plates at the poles being rocked like rafts on the ocean.

This surging magma creates a temporary magnet under the Atlantic Rift, the southern portion of which is facing the

approaching Planet X when the Atlantic Rift is on the day side and buffeted by surging magma as this portion of the

Rift escapes to the dark side, and the northern portion of which is most accessible through a slice of the Earth’s crust

and core toward the North Pole and up thorough the thin Pacific Ocean floor. Thus South Pole surging is noted during

the day, and North Pole surging during the Atlantic Rift night, and during this surging, the Atlantic Rift, as a highly

magnetized part of the crust and in close proximity to the liquid magma, being a deep rift, is collecting magnetized

magma which clings to it. This creates, with every passing hour, a stronger magnet at the Atlantic Rift, a phenomenon

which results in the Atlantic Rift being gripped and stuck for rotation stoppage.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/magma.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:36 AM]

Magma Suring Switch, Zetas Explain

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

Magma Surging Switch

the Zetas Explain

Ionized particles within the liquid magma of Earth's core normally cluster at the poles, or around the

magnetic solid core of the Earth. They break and mingle with the other magma only under duress, such as

the passage of Planet X creates.

When 32 degrees below the Ecliptic and rising to pierce the Ecliptic between the Earth and Sun,

magnetic particles from Planet X add to the particle flow moving into the Earth's S Pole. This causes

the ionized particles which normally cluster at the S Pole to bobble about on one side of the plate.

When rising such that the angle between the Earth's S Pole and Planet X's N Pole is sharper, and

Planet X closer, the particle flow of magnetic particles counters and blocks the flow from N to S within

the Earth's field, creating a larger flow inbound at the S Pole on the opposite side of the Earth. This

causes those ionized particles to switch sides, to avoid the heavy traffic lane. The point where this

bobble was equalized, normal for Earth, was May 31, the dead calm day.

The N Pole of Earth now increasingly has a bobble of ionized particles, also away from the heavy

traffic land. These ionized particles are now poised to rush along the Atlantic Rift, when Planet X

reaches a near point, creating, suddenly, a giant magnet along the Rift, which is gripped to stop

rotation.

ZetaTalk™, written June 2, 2003

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta1.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:36 AM]

Magma Suring Switch, Zetas Explain

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta1.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:36 AM]

ZetaTalk: 3rd Magnet

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: 3rd Magnet

written on June 8, 2003

What stress does the Earth experience when rotation slows and stops? We have mentioned that the core wants to

continue to turn, the crust, which has been grabbed by the near presence of Planet X at the Atlantic Rift point, resists,

slowing and stopping, and that this conflict causes the Earth to moan. During stoppage, and to a lesser degree during

dramatic slowing, the Earth’s magnetic field continues as before but exhibits distress. Normally, the magnetic field is a

particle flow emerging from the N. Pole and circling round to the S. Pole. The presence of Planet X blocks this flow on

that side of the Earth, such that the particles shift to flow more strongly on the Far Side, away from Planet X. When Planet X is close enough to cause agitation and spilling over of the ionized particles that normally group at the poles or

around the highly magnetized core of the Earth, these particles flow Along Under the crust of the Earth until they find themselves captured at the Atlantic Rift. This creates a conflict within the Earth’s magnetic field, as it now has yet

another magnet to deal with.

1. the Earth itself

2. Planet X which is aligned with the Earth but moving gradually past the Earth as it approaches passage

3. the Atlantic Rift, aligned loosely with the Earth, but due to the bulge of the Equator, not strictly aligned.

The distress a highly magnetized Atlantic Rift has on the surging magma is to

create an irregular outgo at the N. Pole, where the particles flowing through