Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations? // Foreign Affairs. 1993. Vol. 72. № 3. Р. 29–30.
Цит. по: McGoldrick D. Human Rights and Religion: The Islamic Debate in Europe. Portland, OR, 2006. P. 89.
Inglehart R., Norris P. The True Clash of Civilizations // Foreign Policy. 2003. № 135.
Riposte Laique, November 26, 2012. http://ripostelaique.com/; также см.: Droite(s)-Extreme(s) blog, http://droites-extremes.blog.lemonde.fr/2010/09/05/ce-quest-vraiment-riposte-laique/.
Вот только несколько примеров: Inglehart R., Norris P. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge, 2004; Taylor C. A Secular Age. Cambridge, 2007; Modern J. L. Secularism in Antebellum America. Chicago, 2011; Secularism and Its Critics / Ed. R. Bhargava. New Delhi, 1998; и большинство тех, кто пишет на сайт Научного совета по социологи The Immanent Frame. http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/.
О полезном различии между словом и понятием см.: Koselleck R. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concept. Stanford, 2002.
Тейлор Ч. Секулярный век. М., 2017. С. 215–216.
Асад Т. Возникновение секулярного: христианство, ислам, модерность. М., 2020.
Mahmood S. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton, 2016. Р. 21.
Davis K. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia, 2008. Р. 11.
Ibid. Р. 77.
Masuzawa T. The Invention of World Religions, or How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago, 2005. См. также: Klassen P. Christianity as a Polemical Concept // The Companion to the Anthropology of Religion / Ed. J. Boddy, M. Lambek. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. P. 344–362.
Асад Т. Возникновение секулярного. С. 9.
Stein J. A. Angels in (Mexican) America // American Literature. 2014. Vol. 86. № 4. P. 684. См. также в том же номере: Coviello P., Hickman J. Introduction: After the Postsecular.
Саид Э. Ориентализм. М., 2006. С. 9.
Farris S. Femonationalism and the «Regular» Army of Labor Called Migrant Women // History of the Present. 2012. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 196.
Цит. по: Schwartz L. Infidel Feminism: Secularism, Religion and Women’s Emancipation, England, 1830–1914. Manchester, 2015. P. 8. Шварц пишет о трудностях, с которыми столкнулись феминистки внутри секуляристского движения при оспаривании аргументов естественного права о месте женщины.
Le Grand Robert de La Langue Française, 2nd ed. Paris, 1987. Vol. 5. P. 915.
Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers. Vol. 14. P. 881.
The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. New York, 1971. Vol. 2. P. 2704.
Casanova J. Secularization // International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences / Ed. N. Smelser, P. B. Baltes. Amsterdam, 2001. P. 13787–13791.
Ibid.
Encyclopedie. Vol. 14. P. 881.
Asad T. Genealogies of Religion: Disciplines and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, 2009. P. 28.
Wallach Scott J. Parité: Sexual Equality and the Crisis of French Universalism. Chicago, 2005.
Conseil d’Etat. Rèflexions sur la laicité. Paris: Conseil d’Etat, 2004. P. 295.
Ibid. P. 341.
Цит. по: Ibid. P. 128; см. также P. 206. Dahlab v. Switzerland, Application № 42393/98 ECHR (2001).
Cour Europeenne des Droits de l’Homme. Grand Chambre, Affaire Lautsi et autres, c. Italie (Requete no. 30814/06), March 18, 2011, 15:11.9.
Ratzinger J., Habermas J. The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. San Francisco.
Renan E. De la part des peuples sèmitiques dans l’histoire de la civilization (1862). См. также: Renan E. L’ Islamisme et la Science // Discours et Conferences. Paris, 1887. Там он говорит об «неполноценности мусульманских стран, управляемых исламом, интеллектуальном ничтожестве тех, кто получает свою культуру и образование от этой религии» (P. 377).
Masuzawa T. The Invention of World Religions. P. 20.
Ibid. P. 179.
Anidjar G. Secularism // Critical Inquiry. 2006. Vol. 33. P. 66.
Цит. по: Mitchell T. Colonizing Egypt. Berkeley, 1991. P. 111.
Fanon F. Algeria Unveiled // A Dying Colonialism. New York, 1965. P. 177.
Ibid. P. 165.
Stoler A. L. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley, 2002. P. 13.
Zupančič A. Why Psychoanalysis? Summertalk series. Natchitoches, LA, 2008. P. 7.
Лефор К. Политические очерки (XIX–XX вв.). М., 2000.
Фуко М. Воля к истине. По ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. М., 1996. С. 205.
Floyd K. The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. Minneapolis, 2009. P. 6.
Armstrong N. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York, 1987. P. 89.
Riley D. «Am I that Name?» Feminism and the Category of «Women» in History. London, 1988. P. 8.
Barker-Benfield G. J. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, 1996. P. xxvi.
Hull I. Sexuality, State, and Civil Society in Germany, 1700–1815. Ithaca, 1997. P. 296.
Juster S. Disorderly Women: Sexual Politics and Evangelicalism in Revolutionary New England. Ithaca, 1996. P. 216.
Maddock Dillon E. The Gender of Freedom: Fictions of Liberalism and the Literary Public Sphere. Stanford, 2007. P. 3.
Najmabadi A. Women with Mustaches and Men without Beards: Gender and Sexual Anxieties of Iranian Modernity. Berkeley, 2005. P. 3.
Brown W. Undoing the Demos: Liberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, 2015.
Auclert H. Le vote des femmes. Paris, 1908. P. 56–57.
Auclert H. Les femmes arabes en Algérie. Paris, 1900. P. 63.
Auclert H. Vote des femmes. P. 56–57.
Shakman Hurd E. The Politics of Secularism in International Relations. Princeton, 2008.
Ibid.
Chadwick O. The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge 1975. P. 93.
Seeley P. O Sainte Mere: Liberalism and the Socialization of Catholic Men in Nineteenth-Century France // Journal of Modern History. 1998. Vol. 70. № 4. P. 866.
Hufton O. Women in Revolution // French Politics and Society. 1989. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 66. Это не значит, что женщины уже не считались (во время Старого режима) проявляющими больший религиозный пыл, нежели мужчины, имеется в виду только то, что в дискурсе антиклерикализма в XIX и XX столетиях революция 1789 г. воспринималась как порождающий момент. См. об этом: Kreiser R. Enthusiasm in Early Eighteenth-Century Paris: The Convulsionaries of Saint-Medard // Catholic Historical Review. 1975. Vol. 61. № 3. P. 353–385; Tallett F. Dechristianizing France // Religion, Society, and Politics in France since 1789 / Eds. F. Tallett, N. Atkin. London, 1991; Thomas K. Women in the Civil War Sects // Crisis in Europe, 1560–1660 / Ed. T. Ashton. New York, 1965. P. 317–340.
Цит. по: Cobb R. Les armees revolutionnaires: Instrument de la terreur dans les departements, avril 1793-Floreal an II. Paris, 1961–63. P. 450.
Tallett F. Dechristianizing France. P. 26.
Моро цитируется в: A History of Private Life. Vol. 4. From the Fires of Revolution to the Great War / Ed. M. Perrot. Cambridge, 1994. P. 44.
Agulhon M. Marianne au combat: L’imagerie et la symbolique republicaine de 1789 а 1880. Paris, 1992.
Stahuljak Z. Pornographic Archaeology: Medicine, Medievalism, and the Invention of the French Nation. Philadelphia, 2012.
Curtis S. A. Charitable Ladies: Gender, Class and Religion in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Paris // Past and Present 2002. № 177. P. 121–156. Информацию о женщинах и католической церкви можно также найти в: Clark L. Schooling the Daughters of Marianne: Textbooks and the Socialization of Girls in Modern French Primary Schools. Albany, 1986; Di Giorgio M. The Catholic Model // A History of Women in the West. Emerging Feminism from Revolution to World War / Ed. G. Duby, M. Perrot. Cambridge, 1993. Vol. 4; Gibson R. Le catholicisme et les femmes en France au XIXe siècle // Revue d’histoire de l’Eglise de France. 1993. № 79. P. 63–94; Harrison C. Zouave Stories // Journal of Modern History. 2007. Vol. 79. № 2. P. 274–305; Langlois C. Catholics and Seculars // Realms of Memory / Ed. P. Nora. New York, 1996; Mills H. «La Charite est une mere»: Catholic Women and Poor Relief in France, 1690–1850 // Charity, Philanthropy and Reform / Eds. M. Cunningham, J. Innes. London, 1998; Seeley P. O Sainte Mere. P. 862–891; Stone J. Anticlericals and Bonnes Soeurs: The Rhetoric of the 1901 Law of Association // French Historical Studies. 2000. Vol. 23. № 1. P. 103–128.
Seeley P. O Sainte Mere. P. 891.
Michelet J. La Femme // Oeuvres Completes. 1985. Vol. 18.
Michelet J. Du Prêtre, de la femme, de la famille. Paris, 1845. P. vi. Дальнейшие ссылки на эту книгу даются номерами страниц в тексте. См. также: Verhoeven T. Neither Male nor Female: The Jesuit as Androgyne, 1843–1870 // Modern and Contemporary France. 2008. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 37–49.
Michelet J. L’ Amour // Oeuvres Completes. Paris, 1985. Vol. 18. P. 221–223.
Цит. по: Barthes R. Michelet. New York, 1987. P. 148.
Hause S. C., Kenny A. R. Women’s Suffrage and Social Politics in the French Third Republic. Princeton, 1984. P. 240. См. также: P. 236–241.
Mayeur F. The Secular Model of Girls’ Education // A History of Women in the West. 1993. Vol. 4.
Daughton J. P. An Empire Divided: Religion, Republicanism, and the Making of French Colonialism, 1880–1914. Oxford, 2006. P. 124.
Wenger T. The God-in-the-Constitution Controversy: American Secularisms in Historical Perspective // Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age / Eds. L. E. Cady, E. Shakman Hurd. New York, 2010. P. 91.
Modern J. L. Secularism in Antebellum America. Chicago, 2011. P. 75.
Вебер М. Хозяйственная этика мировых религий. Сравнительные очерки по социологии религии // Избранное: протестантская этика и дух капитализма. М., 2013. С. 234.
Modern J. L. Secularism. P. 20.
Connolly B. Domestic Intimacies: Incest and the Liberal Subject in Nineteenth-Century America. Philadelphia, 2014. P. 83.
Juster S. Disorderly Women: Sexual Politics and Evangelicalism in Revolutionary New England. Ithaca, 1996. P. 7.
Ibid. P. 109.
Ibid. P. 128.
Ibid. P. 112.
Juster S. Doomsayers: Anglo-American Prophecy in the Age of Revolution. Philadelphia, 2003; Taylor B. Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century. New York, 1982; Thompson E. P. The Making of the English Working Class. New York, 1966.
Moglen S. Excess and Utopia: Meditations on Moravian Bethlehem // History of the Present. 2012. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 136.
Ibid. P. 140–141.
Цитата из нашей с Могленом частной переписки по электронной почте.
Modern S. Secularism. P. 3, 26.
Douglas A. The Feminization of American Culture. New York: Knopf, 1977. О феминизме и религии в Европе см.: Hastings D. K. Fears of a Feminized Church // European Historical Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 38. № 1. P. 34–65.
Modern S. Secularism. P. 37.
Douglas A. Feminization. P. 44.
Modern S. Secularism. P. 249.
Douglass A. Feminization. P. 57.
Ibid. P. 10.
Modern S. Secularism. P. 25.
Maddock Dillon E. The Gender of Freedom: Fictions of Liberalism and the Literary Public Sphere. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007. P. 202.
Connolly B. «Hindoo Marriage» and National Sovereignty in the Early Nineteenth-Century United States // Warring for America, 1803–1818 / Eds. N. Eustace, F. J. Teute. Chapel Hill, 2017. P. 25. Ирония в том, что сторонники секуляризма в итальянском националистическом движении 1920‑х гг. считали индуизм рациональной системой веры, совместимой с секулярным правлением, в отличие от «фанатичного» ислама, который был для них олицетворением религии. См. Stephens J. The Politics of Muslim Rage // History Workshop Journal. 2013. № 77. P. 48.
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion: Religious Politics in Pre-Revolutionary Baden. Princeton, 1996. P. 98. См. также: Weir T. Secularism and Religion in Nineteenth-Century Germany. Cambridge, 2014.
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion. P. 99.
Wenger T. The God-in-the-Constitution Controversy.
Gordon S. B. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, 2002.
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion. P. 101–102.
Токвиль А. де. Демократия в Америке. М., 1992. С. 436.
Modern S. Secularism. P. 113.
Mack P. Religion, Feminism, and the Problem of Agency: Reflections on Eighteenth-Century Quakerism // Women, Gender and Enlightenment / Eds. Knott S., Taylor B. Hampshire, 2005. P. 434–459; Mahmood S. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
Mahmood S. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton, 2016. P. 43.
Al-Azmeh A. Islam and Modernities. London, 1993. P. 12.
Massad J. Colonial Effects: The Making of National Identity in Jordan. New York, 2001. P. 51.
Hallaq W. B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge, 2009. P. 118.
Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 82.
Ibid. P. 82.
Hallaq W. B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. P. 85.
Ibid. P. 120.
Halley J., Rittich K. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law: Genealogies and Contemporary Studies of Family Law Exceptionalism // Special issue on Comparative Family Law of the American Journal of Comparative Law. 2010. № 58.
Ibid. P. 753.
Chatterjee I. Monastic Governmentality, Colonial Misogyny, and Postcolonial Amnesia in South Asia // History of the Present. 2013. Vol. 3. № 1.
Mahmood S. Religious Difference. P. 23.
Mahmood S. Sexuality and Secularism // Religion, the Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference / Eds. L. E. Cady, T. Fessenden. New York, 2013. P. 51.
Surkis J. Scandalous Subjects: Intimacy and Indecency in France and French Algeria, готовится к выходу.
Halley J., Rittich K. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law. P. 772.
Baron B. The Making of the Egyptian Nation // Gendered Nations: Nationalisms and Gender Order in the Long Nineteenth Century / Eds. I. Blom, K. Hagemann, C. Hall. Oxford, 2000. P. 138.
Mahmood S. Religious Difference. P. 32.
Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 51.
Halley J., Rittich K. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law. P. 773. См. также: Klassen P. Mentality, Fundamentality, and the Colonial Secular // The Postsecular Condition / Eds. R. Braidotti, B. Blaagaard, E. Midden. London, 2014. P. 175–194.
Fanon F. Algeria Unveiled // A Dying Colonialism. New York, 1965. P. 63.
Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 83.
Hallaq W. B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. P. 123, цитируя Mir-Hosseini Z. Marriage on Trial: A Study of Islamic Family Law. London, 2000.
Ibid. P. 168; Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 85–99.
Jayawardena K. Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World. London, 1986. P. 4.
Ibid. P. 24.
Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. Chicago, 2015. P. 189.
Цитируется во Введении, примеч. 4.
Цит. по: Floyd K. The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009. P. 87.
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 245.
Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. М., 1996. С. 66. Дюркгейм был не единственным, кто это отмечал, ему предшествовал Руссо, за ним последовал Фрейд.
Цит. по: Kingsley S. Kent, Sex and Suffrage in Britain, 1860–1914. Princeton, 1987. P. 54.
Bloch I. The Sexual Life of Our Time // Its Relations to Modern Civilisation, 1908. P. 534.
Dudink S. Masculinity, Effeminacy, Time // Masculinities in Politics and War: Gendering Modern History / Eds. S. Dudink, K. Hagemann, J. Tosh. Manchester, 2009. P. 78.
Klinger C. Woman-Landscape-Artwork: Alternative Realms or Patriarchal Reserves? // Continental Philosophy in Feminist Perspective: Re-reading the Canon in German / Eds. H. Nagl-Docekal, C. Klinger. University Park, 2000. P. 166–167.
Nye R. Masculinity and Male Codes of Honor in Modern France. Berkeley, 1998; Fraisse G. Reason’s Muse: Sexual Difference and the Birth of Democracy. Chicago, 1994.
Laqueur T. Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Barker-Benfield G.‑J. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago, 1996. P. 127.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Michelet J. L’ Amour // Oeuvres Completes. Vol. 18. P. 61–62.
Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, 1989. P. 189.
Conway J. Stereotypes of Femininity in a Theory of Sexual Evolution // Suffer and Be Still: Women in the Victorian Age / Ed. M. Vicinus. Bloomington, 1972. P. 147.
Ibid. P. 141.
Hollis P. Women in Public, 1850–1914: Documents of the Victorian Women’s Movement. London, 1979. P. 30.
Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? P. 209.
Hull I. Sexuality, State, and Civil Society in Germany, 1700–1815. Ithaca, 1997. P. 249.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. С. 67.
О расовой теории в этот период см. Daughton J. P. An Empire Divided: Religion, Republicanism, and the Making of French Colonialism, 1880–1914. Oxford, 2006; Curtis S. A. Civilizing Habits: Women Missionaries and the Revival of French Empire. Oxford, 2010; Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? P. 211–212; Young R. J. C. Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. New York, 1995.
Schiebinger L. The Mind Has No Sex? P. 222.
Kent A. Sex and Suffrage. P. 42.
Hall C. The Sweet Delights of Home // A History of Private Life / Ed. M. Perrot. Cambridge, 1990. Vol. 4. P. 50.
Цит. по: D’Emilio J., Freedman E. B. Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America. Chicago, 1997. P. 146.
Borie J. Une gynecologie passionne // Miserable et glorieuse: La femme du XIXe siècle. Paris, 1980. P. 157–188.
Вебер М. Наука как призвание и профессия // Избранное: протестантский дух и этика капитализма. М.; СПб., 2013. С. 545.
Там же. С. 533.
Вебер М. Хозяйственная этика мировых религий // Там же. С. 223–224.
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира // Там же. С. 24.
Там же. С. 29.
Brown W. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reader in Political Theory. Lanham, 1988.
Klinger C. Woman-Landscape-Artwork. P. 159.
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира. С. 38.
Aries P. Western Attitudes toward Death. Baltimore, 1974. P. 56–57.
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира. С. 37–38.
Farley J., Geison G. L. Science, Politics and Spontaneous Generation in Nineteenth-Century France: The Pasteur-Pouchet Debate // Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 1974. № 48. P. 161–198.
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 242.
Aries P. Western Attitudes. P. 105.
Densmore et al. v. Evergreen Camp, № 147, Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two, 61 Wash. 230; 112. P. 255; 1910 Wash. Lexis 1320, http://courts.mrsc.org/washreports/061WashReport/061WashReport0230.htm. Я очень благодарна Эллен Страуд за эту ссылку.
Castronovo R. Necro Citizenship: Death, Eroticism, and the Public Sphere in the Nineteenth-Century United States. Durham, 2001.
Aries P. Western Attitudes. P. 56–57.
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира. С. 38.
Kordela A. K. (Psychoanalytic) Biopolitics and Bioraism // Umbr(a). 2011. P. 19. См. также: Kordela A. K. Biopolitics: From Tribes to Commodity Fetishism // Differences. 2013. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 1–29; Kordela A. K. Surplus: Spinoza, Lacan. Albany, 2007.
Edelman L. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004. P. 66.
Цит. по: Nye R. Masculinity. P. 55.
Ibid. P. 56.
Вебер М. Теория ступеней и направлений религиозного неприятия мира. С. 30.
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 244.
Connolly B. Domestic Intimacies: Incest and the Liberal Subject in Nineteenth-Century America. Philadelphia, 2014. P. 10.
Surkis J. Sexing the Citizen: Morality and Masculinity in France, 1870–1920. Ithaca, 2006.
Connolly B. Domestic Intimacies. P. 220.
Connolly B. «Hindoo Marriage» and National Sovereignty in the Early Nineteenth-Century United States // Warring for America, 1803–1818 / Eds. N. Eustace, F. J. Teute. Chapel Hill, 2017. P. 25.
Hull I. Sexuality, State and Civil Society. P. 318–319.
Rochefort F. Laicite et droits des femmes: Quelques jalons pour une reflexion historique // Archives de Philosophie du droit. 2005. № 48. P. 100.
Perrot M. Introduction // A History of Private Life. P. 106.
Najmabadi A. Women with Mustaches and Men without Beards. P. 59.
Kholoussy H. Talking about a Revolution: Gender and the Politics of Marriage in Early Twentieth-Century Egypt // Graduate Researcher: Journal for the Arts, Sciences, and Technology. 2003. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 29.
Pursley S. A Race against Time: Governing Femininity and Reproducing the Future in Revolutionary Iraq, 1945–1963. P. 19. Диссертация, защищенная в 2011 году в Городском университете Нью-Йорка.
Ibid. P. 10, 20.
Hull I. Sexuality, State, and Civil Society. P. 295.
Herzog D. Intimacy and Exclusion: Religious Politics in Pre-Revolutionary Baden. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996. P. 95–98.
Therborn G. Between Sex and Power: Family in the World, 1900–2000. New York, 2004. P. 17.
Rochefort F. Laicite et droits des femmes. P. 101.
О Британии см.: Klug F. «Oh to Be in England»: The British Case Study // Woman-Nation-State / Ed. N. Yuval-Davis, F. Anthias. London, 1989. О британском влиянии в Иордании см.: Massad J. Colonial Effects. P. 35–38.
Sydie R. A. Sex and the Sociological Fathers // Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 1994. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 123.
Jakobsen J. Sex + Freedom = Regulation. Why? // Social Text. 2005. № 84–85. P. 294.
Aries P. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. New York, 1965.
Donzelot J. La police des familles. Paris: Editions des Minuit, 1977. P. 15.
Edelman L. No Future. P. 114, 134.
Ibid. P. 12.
Ibid. Р. 34.
Pursley S. A Race against Time. P. 18.
Martin-Fugier A. Bourgeois Rituals // A History of Private Life. Vol. 4. P. 336.
Donzelot J. La police des familles.
Barker-Benfield G. J. The Spermatic Economy: A Nineteenth-Century View of Sexuality // Feminist Studies. 1972. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 56.
Connolly B. Domestic Intimacies; Aisenberg A. Contagion: Disease, Government, and the «Social Question» in Nineteenth-Century France. Stanford, 1999.
Ridley H. Images of Imperial Rule. London, 1983. P. 75. См. также: Ridley H. Germany in the Mirror of Its Colonial Literature // German Life and Letters. 1974–1975. № 28. P. 375–386; Aitken R. Exclusion and Inclusion: Gradations of Whiteness and Socio-Economic Engineering in German Southwest Africa, 1884–1914. Bern, 2007.
Surkis J. Scandalous Subjects: Intimacy and Indecency in France and French Algeria.
Hammerton A. J. Feminism and Female Emigration, 1861–1886 // A Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Victorian Women / Ed. M. Vicinus. Bloomington, 1977. P. 57.
Chailley-Bert J. L’ Immigration des femmes aux colonies. Paris, 1897. P. 23. Выступление перед собранием Французского колониального совета 12 января 1897.
Ibid. P. 59.
Rifkin M. When Did Indians Become Straight? Kinship, the History of Sexuality, and Native Sovereignty. Oxford, 2011. P. 149.
Ibid. P. 151.
Ibid. P. 152.
Ibid. P. 153. См. также Miles T. Ties that Bind: The Story of an Afro-Cherokee Family in Slavery and Freedom. Berkeley, 2005.
Zimmerman A. Alabama in Africa: Booker T. Washington, the German Empire, and the Globalization of the New South. Princeton, 2010. P. 92.
Pursley S. A Race against Time. P. 162.
Ibid. P. 183–184.
Смит А. Исследование о природе и богатстве народов. М., 2023. С. 67.
Цит. по: Moreau T. Le sang de l’histoire: Michelet, l’histoire, et l’idée de la femme aux XIXe siècle. Paris, 1982. P. 74.
Zaretsky E. Capitalism, the Family, and Personal Life. New York, 1976. P. 25. См. также: Энгельс Ф. Происхождение семьи, частной собственности и государства. М., 2023.
Dillon E. M. The Gender of Freedom: Fictions of Liberalism and the Literary Public Sphere. Stanford, 2004. P. 203.
Ibid.
Ibid. P. 40.
Цит. по: Lewis J. Women in England, 1870–1950: Sexual Division and Social Change. Sussex, 1984. P. 175.
Donzelot J. La police des familles. P. 38.
Цит. по: Stewart M. L. Women, Work and the French State: Labour Protection and Social Patriarchy, 1879–1919. Montreal, 1989. P. 175. См. также: Simon J. L’ Ouviere, Paris, 1861.
Zimmerman A. Alabama in Africa. P. 96.
McClintock A. Family Feuds: Gender, Nationalism, and the Family // Feminist Review. 1993. № 44. P. 64.
Цит. по: Lepore J. Comment: The Sovereignty of Women // New Yorker. 2016. April 18. P. 18.
Gouges O. de. Déclaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne. Paris, 1791.
Viennot E. De l’Ancien Régime au Nouveau: La masculinité au fondement de la modernité // Les défis de la république: Genre, territoires, citoyenneté / Eds. B. Perreau, J. W. Scott. Paris, 2017.
Цит. по: Nye R. Masculinity and Male Codes of Honor in Modern France. Berkeley, 1998. P. 156.
Цит. по: Women in Revolutionary Paris, 1789–1795 / Eds. D. Gay Levy, D. Branson Applewhite, M. Durham Johnson. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1979. P. 215.
Письмо Томаса Джефферсона Анне Уилинг Бингам, 11 мая 1788. http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/presidents/thomas-jefferson/letters-of-thomas-jefferson/jefl69.php.
Kerber L. The Republic Mother: Women and the Enlightenment — an American Perspective // American Quarterly. 1976. Vol. 28. № 2. P. 187–205.
Brown W. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading in Political Theory. Lanham, 1988.
Цит. по: Knibiehler Y. Les médecins et la «Nature féminine» au temps du Code civil // Annales E. S. C. 1976. № 31. P. 835.
Brown W. Manhood and Politics. P. 180.
Hull I. Sexuality, State, and Civil Society. P. 335.
Ibid. P. 411.
Ibid.
Fraisse G., Perrot M. Defining the Essence of Femininity // A History of Women in the West / Ed. M. Perrot. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993. P. 11.
Pateman C. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988. P. 113.
Ibid. P. 181.
Токвиль А. де. Демократия в Америке. М.: Прогресс, 1992. С. 436.
Ibid.
Hull I. Sexuality, State, Civil Society. P. 240.
McClintock A. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. New York, 1995. P. 45.
Локк Дж. Трактат II // Два трактата о правлении. М., 2019. С. 296.
Цит. по: Pateman C. The Sexual Contract. P. 97.
Фрейд З. Тотем и табу // Фрейд З. Сочинения: В 10 т. М., 2007. Т. 8. С. 426.
Там же. С. 430.
Там же. С. 433.
Copjec J. Read My Desire: Lacan against the Historicists. Cambridge, 1994. P. 154.
Фрейд З. Тотем и табу. С. 428. См. также: Lacan J. The Signification of the Phallus // Écrits: A Selection, London, 1977.
Канторович Э. Два тела короля. Исследование по средневековой политической теологии. М.: Изд-во Ин-та Гайдара, 2015.
Stallybrass P., White A. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca, 1986.
Цит. по: Tixerant J. Le féminisme à l’époque de 1848 dans l’ordre politique et l’ordre économique. Paris, 1908. P. 86.
Руссо Ж.‑Ж. Эмиль, или о Воспитании // Руссо Ж.‑Ж. Педагогические сочинения: В 2 т. М., 1981. Т. 1. С. 434. См. также: Zerilli L. Signifying Woman: Culture and Chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill. Ithaca, 1994.
Гегель Г.‑В.‑Ф. Философия права. М., 1990. С. 216.
Lacan J. The Signification of the Phallus.
Surkis J. Carnival Balls and Penal Codes: Body Politics in July Monarchy France // History of the Present. 2011. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 77–78.
Лефор К. Вопрос о демократии // Политические очерки (XIX–XX вв.). М., 2000. С. 26.
Там же. С. 29.
Вебер М. Хозяйственная этика мировых религий. С. 237.
Copjec J. Read My Desire. P. 153.
Лефор К. Вопрос о демократии. С. 26.
Scott Wallach J. Introduction: Flyers into the Unknown. The Fantasy of Feminist History. Durham, NC, 2011. P. 1–22.
Thébaud F. The Great War and the Triumph of Sexual Division // A History of Women in the West. Vol. 5. Toward a Cultural Identity in the Twentieth Century / Eds. F. Thébaud, G. Duby, M. Perrot. Cambridge, 1994. P. 35.
Roberts M. L. Civilization without Sexes: Reconstructing Gender in Postwar France, 1917–1927. Chicago, 1994. P. 4.
de Condorcet. On the Admission of Women to the Rights of Citizenship // Selected Writings. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976. P. 98.
Levy D. G., Applewhite H. B., Johnson M. D. Women in Revolutionary Paris. P. 220.
Ibid.
Цит. по: Offen K. Ernest Legouvé and the Doctrine of «Equality in Difference» for Women: A Case Study of Male Feminism in Nineteenth-Century French Thought // Journal of Modern History. 1986. Vol. 58. № 2. P. 476.
Цит. по: Fauré C. La démocratie sans les femmes: Essai sur le libéralisme en France. Paris, 1986. P. 226.
Alary J. Le travail de la femme dans l’imprimerie typographique; Ses conséquences physiques et morales. Paris, 1883. P. 15.
Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer: French Feminists and the Rights of Man. Cambridge, 1996. P. 118–119.
Gubin E., Jacques C., Marissal C. Une citoyenneté différée? Le suffrage féminin en Belgique, 1830–1940 // Féminismes et identités nationales/ Eds. Y. Cohen, F. Thébaud. Programme Rhône-Alpes de recherche en sciences humaines, 1998. P. 100.
Evans S. Born for Liberty: A History of Women in America. New York, 1989. P. 56.
Ibid. P. 154.
Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989. P. 13.
Hollis P. Women in Public, 1850–1900: Documents of the Victorian Women’s Movement. London, 1979. P. 305.
Ibid. P. 307.
Ibid. P. 320.
Conway J. Stereotypes of Femininity in a Theory of Sexual Evolution // Suffer and Be Still: Women in the Victorian Age/ Ed. M. Vicinus. Bloomington, 1972. P. 144.
Ibid. P. 146.
Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer.
Riley D. Am I that Name? См. особенно P. 67–69, 112–113. См. также: Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism.
Hollis P. Women in Public. P. 28–30.
Ibid. P. 312.
Ibid. P. 331.
Evans S. Born for Liberty. P. 15.
Цит. по: Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer. P. 77.
Riley D. Am I that Name? P. 46.
Ibid. P. 48.
Ibid. P. 72–73.
Бовуар С. де. Второй пол. М., 1997. С. 175.
Там же. С. 762.
Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. P. 110.
Scott Wallach J. Parité. P. 143.
Riley D. Am I that Name? P. 112–113.
Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. P. 186.
Koven S., Michel S. Womanly Duties: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States // Gender and History in Western Europe / Ed. R. Shoemaker, M. Vincent. London, 1998. P. 339.
Ibid.
Pelletier M. La Femme en lutte pour ses droits. Paris, 1907. P. 37. О Пеллетье см.: Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer. P. 125–160.
Cott N. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. P. 221.
Ibid. P. 174.
Eisenstein H. Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women’s Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World. Boulder, 2009.
Lagrave R.‑M. A Supervised Emancipation // A History of Women in the West. 1993. Vol. 5. P. 467.
Ibid. P. 488.
Göle N. The Gendered Nature of the Public Sphere // Public Culture. 1997. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 68. См. также: Göle N. Islam and Secularity: The Future of Europe’s Public Sphere. Durham, 2015.
White J. State Feminism, Modernization, and the Turkish Republican Woman // NWSA Journal. 2003. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 153–154.
Kandiyoti D. Emancipated but Unliberated? Reflections on the Turkish Case // Feminist Studies. 1987. Vol. 13. № 2. P. 324. См. также: Cinar A. Subversion and Subjugation in the Public Sphere: Secularism and the Islamic Headscarf // Signs. 2008. Vol. 33. № 4. P. 891–913; Arat Z. F. Kemalism and Turkish Women // Women and Politics. 1994. Vol. 14. № 4. P. 57–80.
Pursley S. A Race against Time. P. 83.
Ibid.
Thompson E. Colonial Citizens: Republican Rights, Paternal Privilege, and Gender in French Syria and Lebanon. New York, 2000. P. 143.
Sinha M. Specters of Mother India: The Global Restructuring of an Empire. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006. P. 235.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid. P. 222.
Ibid. P. 253.
Лефор К. Права человека и провиденциональное государство // Политические очерки (XIX–XX вв.). М., 2000. С. 56.
Жак Маритен называл его «теократическим атеизмом». Цит. по: Moyn S. From Communist to Muslim: European Human Rights, the Cold War, and Religious Liberty // South Atlantic Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 11. № 3:1. P. 72.
История религии при советском строе сложнее, чем предполагает антикоммунистическая риторика. Хотя атеизм и был государственной политикой, религия была подавлена не полностью; иногда ее терпели и даже поощряли официальные лица. Касательно менявшейся советской политики в отношении религии см.: Smith S. A. Communism and Religion // The Cambridge History of Communism / Eds. J. Furst, S. Pons, M. Selden. Cambridge, 2017. Vol. 3.
Kirby D. Harry Truman’s Religious Legacy: The Holy Alliance, Containment, and the Cold War // Religion and the Cold War / Ed. D. Kirby. Basingstoke, 2003. P. 78.
См.: Aiello T. Constructing «Godless Communism»: Religion, Politics, and Popular Culture, 1954–1960 // Americana: The Journal of American Popular Culture. 2005. Vol. 4. № 1.
Shaw T. «Martyrs, Miracles, and Martians»: Religious and Cold War Cinematic Propaganda in the 1950s // Religion and the Cold War. P. 214.
Фуко М. Рождение биополитики. СПб., 2010. С. 86.
Там же. С. 88. Проницательный анализ на основании этих лекций см. в: Sabsay L. The Emergence of the Other Sexual Citizen: Orientalism and the Modernisation of Sexuality // Citizenship Studies. 2012. Vol. 16. № 5–6. P. 605–623.
Kirby D. Harry Truman’s Religious Legacy: The Holy Alliance, Containment and the Cold War. P. 80.
Churchill W. Sinews of Peace. March 5, 1946. http://www.historyguide.org/europe/churchill.html.
Цит. по: Saunders Stonor F. The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters. New York, 1999. P. 58. См. также: Kirby D. Divinely Sanctioned: The Anglo-American Cold War Alliance and the Defence of Western Civilization and Christianity, 1945–1948 // Journal of Contemporary History. 2000. Vol. 35. № 3. P. 412.
Moyn S. From Communist to Muslim. P. 76.
Kirby D. The Religious Cold War // The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War / Eds. R. H. Immerman, P. Goedde. Oxford, 2013. P. 549.
Egerton G. Between War and Peace: Politics, Religion and Human Rights in Early Cold War Canada, 1945–1950 // Religion and the Cold War. P. 163.
Ibid.
United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.
Egerton G. Between War and Peace. P. 175.
Moyn S. From Communist to Muslim. P. 76.
Ibid. P. 77.
Ibid. P. 65, 77.
Ibid. P. 72.
Kirby D. The Religious Cold War. P. 549.
Ibid. P. 549–550.
Plummer B. G. Race and the Cold War // The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War. P. 503.
Ibid.
Цит. по: Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 55.
Kirby D. The Religious Cold War. P. 552. См. также: Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 109.
Kirby D. The Religious Cold War. P. 553.
Huntington S. P. Democracy’s Third Wave // Journal of Democracy. Spring 1993. P. 13.
Waldman P., Pope H. Updated «Crusade» Reference Reinforces Fears War on Terrorism Is against Muslims // Wall Street Journal online. September, 21, 2001. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1001020294332922160.
Цит. по: Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 14.
Цит. по: Fassin E. National Identities and Transnational Intimacies: Sexual Democracy and the Politics of Immigration in Europe // Public Culture. 2010. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 513.
Ibid. P. 521.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel: NWO Has Failed, Germany Returning to Its Christian Roots! // Politicalvelcraft.org. October 18, 2010. https://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/10/18/german-chancellor-angela-merkel-nwo-has-failed-germany-returning-to-its-christian-roots.
Ratzinger J., Habermas J. The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. San Francisco, 2007.
Habermas J. Time of Transitions. Cambridge, 2006. P. 150–151.
Pope Benedict XVI. Regensburg address. September 12, 2006 // Zenit.org. https://zenit.org/articles/papal-address-at-university-of-regensburg/.
Friedman G. A Net Assessment of the Middle East // Geopolitical Weekly. 2015. June 9.
Salisbury H. E. Nixon and Khrushchev Argue in Public as U. S. Exhibit Opens; Accuse Each Other of Threats // New York Times. 1959. July 24.
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. New York, 2008. P. 13.
Vicedo M. The Nature and Nurture of Love: From Imprinting to Attachment in Cold War America. Chicago, 2014. P. 80.
Laville H. Gender and Women’s Rights in the Cold War // The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War. P. 531.
Ibid. Р. 530. Еще одним полем сражения, конечно, была раса. См.: Saunders Stonor F. The Cultural Cold War. P. 20.
Gal S., Kligman G. The Politics of Gender after Socialism. Princeton, 2000. См.: Donert C. Women’s Rights in Cold War Europe: Disentangling Feminist Histories // Past and Present. Supplement. 2013. № 8. P. 178–202.
Цит. по: Laville H. Gender and Women’s Rights. P. 530.
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound. P. 22.
Ibid. P. 132.
de Haan F. Continuing Cold War Paradigms in Western Historiography of Transnational Women’s Organizations: The Case of the Women’s International Democratic Federation (WIDF) // Women’s History Review. Vol. 19. № 4. 2010. P. 547–573.
Цит. по: Weigand K. The Red Menace: The Feminine Mystique and Ohio Un-American Activities Commission // Journal of Women’s History. 1992. № 3. P. 71.
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound. P. 91.
Ibid. P. 95.
Rosenberg E. Foreign Affairs after WWII // Diplomatic History. 1994. № 18. P. 68.
Ibid. P. 70.
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound. P. 99.
Herzog D. Sexuality in Europe: A Twentieth-Century History. Cambridge, 2011. P. 106.
May Tyler E. Homeward Bound. P. 142.
Ibid. P. 142–143.
Herzog D. Sexuality in Europe. P. 107, 137–139.
Olcott J. Cold War Conflicts and Cheap Cabaret: Sexual Politics at the 1975 United Nations International Women’s Year Conference // Gender and History. 2010. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 733–754.
Bock G. Poverty and Mothers’ Rights in the Emerging Welfare States // A History of Women in the West. 1994. Vol. 5. P. 405.
McIntosh A. C., Finkle J. L. The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: A New Paradigm? // Population and Development Review. 1995. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 227.
Moyn S. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, 2010. P. 12.
Ghodsee K. Revisiting the United Nations Decade for Women: Brief Reflections on Feminism, Capitalism and Cold War Politics in the Early Years of the International Women’s Movement // Women’s Studies International Forum. 2010. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 3–12.
Herzog D. Sexuality in Europe. P. 1–3.
Zaretsky E. Capitalism, the Family, and Personal Life. New York, 1976.
Herzog D. Sexuality in Europe. P. 133.
Ibid. P. 146.
Kinsey A. C. et al. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. Bloomington, 1998.
Global Feminisms since 1945: A Survey of Issues and Controversies / Ed. B. Smith. New York, 2000; Rosen R. The World Split Open: How the Modern Women’s Movement Changed America. New York, 2006; Holmstrom N. The Socialist Feminist Project: A Contemporary Reader in Theory and Politics. New York, 2004; Faderman L. The Gay Revolution: The Story of the Struggle. New York, 2015.
Snitow A., Stansell C., Thompson S. Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality. New York, 1983. P. 41.
MacKinnon C. A. Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory // Feminism and Sexuality: A Reader / Eds. Jackson S., McIntosh M. New York, 1996. P. 182–190.
Wittig M. One Is Not Born a Woman // The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism / Ed. V. B. Letich. New York: W. W. Norton, 2010.
Firestone S. The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Bantam, 1970.
Spector J. Prostitution and Pornography: Philosophical Debate about the Sex Industry. Stanford, 2006.
Conflicts in Feminism / Eds. M. Hirsch, E. Keller Fox. New York, 1990.
Хороший обзор приведен в: Feminist Perspectives on Class and Work. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy online. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-class/.
Snitow et al. Powers of Desire. P. 35.
Ibid. P. 41–42.
Martin E. The End of the Body? // American Ethnologist. 1992. P. 121.
Sabsay L. The Emergence of the Other Sexual Citizen. P. 608.
Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 217.
Sabsay L. The Emergence of the Other Sexual Citizen. P. 610.
Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 132–133.
Bernstein E. Introduction: Sexual Economies and New Regimes of Governance // Social Politics. 2014. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 345–354. См. также: Bernstein E. Brokered Subjects: Sex, Trafficking, and the Politics of Freedom. Chicago, 2017.
Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 145.
Grewal I. Transnational America. Durham, 2005. P. 157. См. также обсуждение этих вопросов в: Massad J. Islam in Liberalism. P. 135–145.
Fassin E. National Identities and Transnational Intimacies. P. 513.
Goven J. Gender Politics in Hungary: Autonomy and Antifeminism // Gender Politics and Post-Communism: Reflections from Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union / Eds. N. Funk, M. Mueller. New York, 1993. P. 227.
Gal S., Kligman G. The Politics of Gender. P. 69.
Kuhar R. Playing with Science: Sexual Citizenship and the Roman Catholic Counter-Narratives in Slovenia and Croatia // Women’s Studies International Forum online. August 14, 2014.
Gal S., Kligman G. The Politics of Gender. P. 29.
Ibid. P. 69.
Ibid.
Fabian K. Contemporary Women’s Movements in Hungary: Globalization, Democracy, and Gender Equality. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.
См. важную работу на эту тему: Cirstocea I. La fin du Deuxième Monde et la seconde vie de la femme rouge: Sociologie politique des constructions transnationales du genre en contexte postsocialiste // Mémoire de Recherche Original, Dossier pour l’habilitation à diriger des recherches. Université du Paris 1, Panthéon Sorbonne, January 2017.
Harsanyi D. P. Women in Romania // Gender Politics and Post-Communism / Eds. N. Funk, M. Mueller. P. 49.
Hauser E., Heyns B., Mansbridge J. Feminism in the Interstices of Politics and Culture: Poland in Transition // Gender Politics and Post-Communism. P. 267.
Drakulic S. Women and the New Democracy in the Former Yugoslavia // Gender Politics and Post-Communism. P. 127.
Dölling I. «But the Pictures Stay the Same…» The Image of Women in the Journal Für Dich before and after the «Turning Point» // Gender Politics and Post-Communism. P. 177.
Lissyutkina L. Soviet Women at the Crossroads of Perestroika // Gender Politics and Post-Communism. P. 284.
Waters E. Finding a Voice: The Emergence of a Women’s Movement, Interview with Anastasya Posadskaya and Valentina Konstantinova of the Center for Gender Studies in Moscow // Gender Politics and Post-Communism / Ed. N. Funk, M. Mueller. P. 295.
Ibid. P. 296–297.
Goven J. Gender Politics in Hungary // Ibid. P. 224–240.
Gal S., Kligman G. The Politics of Gender. P. 83.
См. широкую дискуссию с участием множества ученых, организованную Франсиской де Хаан: Ten Years After: Communism and Feminism Revisited // Aspasia. 2016. № 10. P. 102–168.
Le Nouvel observateur. 1989. November 2.
Inglehart R., Norris P. The True Clash of Civilizations. P. 65.
Ibid. P. 68.
Nussbaum M. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, 2001. P. 78–79.
Цит. по: Fernando M. The Republic Unsettled: Muslim French and the Contradictions of Secularism. Durham, 2014. P. 210.
Ibid.
Ibid. P. 211.
См., например: Bilefsky D. Ordered to Wear Heels, She Ignited a Rebellion // New York Times. 2017. January 26. P. A9.
Eisenstein H. Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women’s Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World. Boulder, 2009. P. viii — ix.
Sarkozy N. Convention sur l’immigration — Une immigration choisie, une intégration réussie. Выступление на съезде «Союза за народное движение» (UMP) 9 июня 2005. Я благодарна за эту ссылку Эрику Фоссену. См. также: Fassin E. La démocratie sexuelle et le conflit des civilisations // Multitudes. 2006. № 26. P. 123–131.
Siddiqi D. M. Solidarity, Sexuality and Saving Muslim Women in Neoliberal Times // Women’s Studies Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 42. № 3–4. P. 292–306. См. статью об этой рекламе: www.elle.com/news/culture/american-apparel-bangladesh-ad. Похожий аргумент о приравнивании обнаженного женского тела к сексуальному освобождению приводят двое ученых, разбиравших фильм Айаана Хирси Али «Подчинение» (снятого вместе с Тео ван Гогом): «Женская нагота означает права независимой женщины на тело» — даже если это тело выставляется для того, чтобы его увидели мужчины (Leeuw M. de, Wichelen S. van. Please, Go Wake Up: Submission, Hirsi Ali and the «War on Terror» in the Netherlands // Feminist Media Studies. 2005. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 332).
Fassin E. National Identities and Transnational Intimacies: Sexual Democracy and the Politics of Immigration in Europe // Public Culture. 2010. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 513.
Norton A. On the Muslim Question. Princeton, 2013.
Foucault M. The Confession of the Flesh // Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York, 1970. P. 219.
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 204–205.
Там же. С. 122.
Там же. С. 251.
Foucault M. History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books, 1980. Vol. 1. P. 103.
Фуко М. Воля к истине. С. 265–266.
Foucault M. The Confession of the Flesh. P. 220.
См., например: Bernstein E. The Sexual Politics of the «New Abolitionism» // Differences. 2007. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 128–151 и Temporarily Yours: Intimacy, Authenticity, and the Commerce of Sex. Chicago, 2007; Herzog D. Sex in Crisis: The New Sexual Revolution and the Future of American Politics. New York, 2008; Vance C. S. States of Contradiction: Twelve Ways to Do Nothing about Trafficking while Pretending to // Social Research. 2011. Vol. 78. № 3. P. 933–945; Innocence and Experience: Melodramatic Narratives of Sex Trafficking and Their Consequences for Law and Policy // History of the Present. 2012. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 200–218.
Schulman S. Israel and «Pinkwashing» // New York Times. 2011. November 22.
Norton A. On the Muslim Question. P. 57.
Mahmood S. The Politics of Piety. Princeton, 2004. P. 17. Классической работой в данном случае является: Батлер Дж. Психика власти: теории субъекции. СПб., 2002.
Ibid. P. 32.
Ibid. P. 28.
Göle N. Manifestations of the Religious-Secular Divide: Self-State and the Public Sphere // Comparative Secularisms in a Global Age / Eds. E. L. Cady, E. Hurd Shakman. New York, 2010. P. 49–50.
Ibid. P. 48.
Ibid. P. 49.
Ibid. P. 50.
Farris S. Femonationalism and the «Regular» Army of Labor Called Migrant Women // History of the Present. 2012. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 196.
Chasin A. Selling Out: The Gay and Lesbian Movement Goes to Market. New York, 2000; Harvey D. Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2007. № 610. P. 31. См. также: Rofel L. Desiring China: Experiments in Neoliberalism, Sexuality, and Public Culture. Durham, 2007.
Kordela A. K. (Psychoanalytic) Biopolitics and Bioracism // Umbr(a). 2011. P. 19. См. также ее Consent beyond Ideology: (Marxian-Psychoanalytic) Biopolitics // Differences. 2013. Vol. 24. № 1.
Ibid.
Цит. по: Benbassa E. The Jews of France: A History from Antiquity to the Present. Princeton, 1999. P. 81.
Norton A. On the Muslim Question. Princeton, 2013. P. 171.
Brown W. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, 1995. P. 133–134.
Hartman S. V. Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. New York, 1997. P. 6.
Scott Wallach J. Only Paradoxes to Offer.
Hirsi Ali A. Infidel. New York, 2007.
Цит. по: Deltombe T. L’ Islam imaginaire: La construction médiatique de l’Islamophobie en France, 1975–2005. Paris, 2005. Жак Ширак цит. по: Deltombe T. Ibid. P. 347.
Vigerie A., Zelensky A. Laïcardes’ pusique féministes // Pro-Choix. 2003. № 25. P. 12.
Маркс К. К еврейскому вопросу // Маркс К. Сочинения: В 30 т. М., 1955. Т. 1. С. 386.
The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. New York, 1971. Vol. 1. P. 848.
Ibid.
Hartman S. V. Scenes of Subjection. P. 57.
Маркс К. К еврейскому вопросу. С. 390.
Там же.
Маркс К. Капитал // Сочинения. Т. 23. С. 69.
Brown W. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, 2015.
Ibid.
Deci E., Ryan R. eds., Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2002.
Lloyd K. The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. Minneapolis, 2009.
Zaretsky E. Capitalism, the Family, and Personal Life. New York, 1976. P. 111.
Фуко М. Безопасность, территория, население: Курс лекций, прочитанный в Коллеж де Франс (1977–1978). СПб., 2011. С. 87–88.
Zelizer V. A. The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton, 2005.
Norton A. On the Muslim Question. P. 56.
Классическое исследование в данном случае, естественно: Батлер Дж. Гендерное беспокойство. М., 2022.
Scott Wallach J. The Veil and the Political Unconscious of French Republicanism // Orient XXI. 2016. April 27.