Vanilla

Kenneth M. Cameron

Introduction

Vanilla and its relatives are surviving members of what is likely an ancient lineage of flowering plants. Many are restricted to remote localities, and some are threatened with extinction. We certainly know a great deal about Vanilla planifolia—methods of cultivation, diseases that affect the domesticated vines, and techniques of fruit processing—but the fundamental natural history of the entire genus Vanilla and its closest relatives is still poorly known. The systematic study of these plants has been and continues to be surrounded by controversies. For these reasons it is encouraging to witness the increased level of knowledge in recent years regarding their classification and evolution, which has come about primarily thanks to the increased use of DNA-based data in systematic studies (e.g., see Cameron, 2003, 2004, 2006).

Until the end of the twentieth century, the vanilloid orchids had proven difficult to classify within any particular subtribe, tribe, or subfamily of the family Orchidaceae. On the one hand, they share the presence of a fully bent, single, fertile anther with various advanced orchid lineages. On the other hand, they exhibit a variety of characters considered primitive among orchids. Botanists now consider the single fertile anther at the apex of the vanilla flower’s column to have risen by way of a different evolutionary process than that of nearly all other orchids (i.e., those classified within the Epidendroideae and Orchidoideae subfamilies). For this reason and others mentioned below, vanilla and related orchids are now classified within their own unique subfamily, Vanilloideae, as shown in Figure 1.1.

FIGURE 1.1 Cladogram depicting the phylogenetic relationships among subfamilies of Orchidaceae and among genera within Vanilloideae based on a combination of nuclear, mitochondrial, and plastid DNA sequence data. The subfamily is divided into two tribes: Pogonieae and Vanilleae. Note that Vanilla shares a common ancestor with a clade of four genera including Galeola and Pseudovanilla.

As we move further into the twenty-first century and the genomics era, there is little doubt that plant breeders will endeavor to improve vanilla as a crop plant using genetic modification. Any future genetic studies into the structure and development of the vanilla flower and/or fruit should consider looking closely at other genera of Vanilloideae with shared ancestry, rather than making direct comparisons only to more distantly related orchids or other flowering plants. Such comparisons could be misleading in their assumptions of homology. This point is best appreciated by considering that over the course of more than 65 million years, vanilloid orchids have become adapted to a variety of specialized habitats, pollinators, and seed-dispersal strategies. They all share a fundamental genome in common, based on a now extinct ancestor, and yet differences in gene expression and regulation ultimately determine whether a given vanilloid orchid grows in the tropics or survives temperatures well below freezing, whether it grows as an erect herb or as a vine, and whether it will produce a dry flavorless capsule or an aromatic fleshy fruit. As genomic and proteomic technology is eventually applied to crop plants of lesser economic value (compared to cereals and legumes, for example) studies targeting the improvement of vanilla may also wish to consider other genera of tribe Vanilleae or subfamily Vanilloideae. For example, it might be possible to develop more cold- and shade-tolerant vanilla vines by first studying the physiology and genetic makeup of Cyrtosia, a close relative that survives in the deciduous forests of Japan and China. On the basis of these arguments, a review of vanilloid orchid systematics (the scientific study of the diversity and classification of organisms) is presented here in order to set the stage for a more comprehensive understanding of the biology of V. planifolia and these exceptional orchids.

Evolution of Vanilloid Orchids

An unsubstantiated hypothesis has persisted among biologists that the orchid family is only recently evolved relative to other flowering plants. To support this opinion, botanists cite the relatively low levels of genetic diversity among orchid genera and species, many of which can be hybridized easily with one another. They provide evidence in the fact that the geologically young Andes of South America and Highlands of New Guinea are centers of greatest orchid diversity. The close relationship between orchids and social bees, which are thought to have evolved much later than other insects, is also given as proof, and the fact that most orchid genera are found in either the Paleotropics or the Neotropics, but rarely are pantropical, indicates to some that Orchidaceae evolved only recently and certainly long after the separation of today’s continents.

Molecular phylogenetic studies of Vanilloideae challenge the notion that the entire orchid family is recently evolved, however, and new perspectives on the systematics of Orchidaceae downplay or even contradict some of the facts mentioned above. For example, Vanilla is one of a few orchid genera with a transoceanic distribution that may not be due entirely to long-distance dispersal. Extant species are native to North America, South America, Africa, and Asia (see Figure 1.2). The fact that vanilloid orchids survive in the Guyana Shield region of South America, tropical Australia and Africa, Madagascar, and on the island of New Caledonia (a nonvolcanic Pacific island with a peculiar ancient flora that separated from Gondwana around 65 million years ago) may also provide evidence of their considerable age and possible status as ancient relicts (Cameron, 1999, 2000).

FIGURE 1.2 Paleotropical distribution of Vanilla, and estimates of species diversity within each geographic region.

Furthermore, subfamily Vanilloideae is positioned near the base of the orchid family tree, and Orchidaceae is the basal family within the large monocot order Asparagales (including onions, agaves, hyacinths, and the iris family, among others). Molecular clock estimates of the evolutionary age of these plants have calculated that Orchidacaeae may trace their origins back at least 76–119 million years (Janssen and Bremer, 2004; Ramirez et al., 2007). Vanilloid orchids, in turn, are at least 62 million years old. Molecular clocks can only provide minimum ages, so these plants are probably even older. Critical to this approach is the use of a calibration point for the “clock,” which, in the case of Orchidaceae, has been provided by a 15–20-million-year-old fossil specimen of orchid pollen attached to an extinct bee preserved in amber (Ramirez et al., 2007).

Subfamily Vanilloideae among Orchids

As mentioned already, the vanilloid orchids, Vanilloideae, have been recognized as a subfamily of Orchidaceae only in the past decade, as DNA data have been used to reevaluate relationships among all orchids. Cameron (2007) has provided a detailed review of this DNA-driven revolution in orchid taxonomy from 1997 to 2007. The current systems of orchid classification (e.g., Chase et al., 2003) divide Orchidaceae into five subfamilies. The largest, with approximately 650 genera and 18,000 species, is Epidendroideae, which is dominated by tropical epiphytes and those orchids most highly prized as ornamentals. Orchidoideae, the second largest subfamily, is made up almost exclusively of terrestrial species classified within approximately 200 genera. Both subfamilies are characterized by monandrous flowers (meaning they have only one anther). All species within the subfamily Vanilloideae also possess flowers with just a single fertile anther, but this condition is considered to have evolved independently from Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae, and is the result of a unique mode of floral development (Freudenstein et al., 2002). In other words, the reduction in stamen/anther number from several (probably from six down to three and eventually down to one) occurred at least two times within Orchidaceae. Through the process of evolution, orchid flowers are thought to have undergone significant structural modifications resulting in flowers with pronounced bilateral symmetry, loss of stamens, and fusion of the remaining stamen(s) with the pistil to form a central column. A clue to explain the beginnings of this hypothetical evolutionary continuum can be found today by examining living members of the fourth orchid subfamily, Apostasioideae, which contains two genera: Neuwiedia and Apostasia. Species of Neuwiedia are triandrous, possessing flowers with three fertile anthers. These are only partially fused with the base of the pistil, and the perianth of the flower is only slightly bilateral in symmetry. Apostasioid orchids in many ways may be viewed as the most “primitive” of all orchids in that they show the least number of modifications from the basic blueprint of a hypothetical pre-orchid monocot ancestor. Diandrous flowers (i.e., with two fertile anthers) define the fifth orchid subfamily, Cypripedioideae. This group of about 120 species is commonly called “lady’s slipper orchids.” In terms of relative size, Cypripedioideae is more diverse than Apostasio-ideae (15 species), but less diverse than Vanilloideae (200 species), which will be considered further below.

Before they were classified as their own subfamily of Orchidaceae, most of the vanilloid orchids were considered to be primitive members of the monandrous subfamily Epidendroideae, but somewhat unconvincingly so. In fact, Dressler’s (1993) pre-molecular system of orchid classification listed many of the vanilloid orchids under the category insertae sedis (meaning “of uncertain status”). At one time, it was even suggested that they might be best treated as a separate family all their own, Vanillaceae, closely related to, but separate from, Orchidaceae (Lindley, 1835). Why the uncertainty? A mix of what are assumed to be both primitive and advanced floral features among vanilloid orchids can be claimed to be the source of greatest confusion. Their precise position among orchids was eventually laid to rest using comparisons of DNA sequence information, and among the most unexpected results of the first molecular phylogenetic studies of orchids was the relocation of vanilla and its relatives from a position among the other orchids with a single fertile anther to a placement near the base of the orchid family tree (Cameron et al., 1999). Recognition of Vanilloideae as a monophyletic subfamily helped in solving one of the more perplexing enigmas of orchid systematics.

Species Diversity within Vanilla

Within Vanilloideae are no fewer than 15 genera, but Vanilla is the most diverse of these. There is yet to be published a formal monograph of the genus, but there does exist a taxonomic treatment of Vanilla that considered all the species known at the time. Unfortunately, this treatment was written more than 50 years ago (Portères, 1954).

Very recently, a taxonomic synopsis for Vanilla was published posthumously based upon the work of the late Mexican botanist Miguel A. Soto Arenas (Soto Arenas and Cribb, 2010). Within this important preliminary work are presented keys to the species, information about geographic distribution, and lists of select specimens. It serves as a significant step toward updating the systematic treatment of the genus. The 15 Mexican and Central American species were treated more completely in a posthumously published work by Soto Arenas and Dressler (2010). Within this paper one will find detailed descriptions, illustrations, and information on the molecular characterization of the Mesoamerican species.

The current worldwide checklist of all orchid species today recognizes 110 species of Vanilla (Govaerts et al., 2008). Most of these (61 species) are Neotropical natives of South America, Central America, Caribbean islands, and southern Florida. Africa claims 23 native species, with at least five of these restricted to Madagascar. The remaining species of Vanilla are found on the Indian subcontinent and throughout tropical Southeast Asia. No species of Vanilla are native to Australia. Likewise, Polynesia and other oceanic islands of the Pacific lack native species of Vanilla. This is perplexing to some since “Tahitian Vanilla” is cultivated throughout the Pacific, and its scientific name, Vanilla tahitensis, implies that it is indigenous to the French Polynesian island of Tahiti. What was described more than 75 years ago (Moore, 1933) as a new “species” of Vanilla, however, has been proven recently by Lubinsky et al. (2008) to be nothing more than a primary hybrid between Neotropical V. planifolia (the maternal parent) and V. odorata (the paternal parent).

In terms of classification of species within the genus Vanilla, these were formally placed into one of two possible sections by Rolfe (1896). The first, Vanilla section Aphyllae, was erected to accommodate all of the leafless species in the genus (e.g., V. aphylla, V. barbellata, V. roscheri, and others). Species within this section grow on the African mainland, Madagascar, Southeast Asia, and also on islands in the Caribbean. Although some of these species produce fleshy fruits, there is no evidence that any of them are aromatic. Rolfe’s classification of these species together implies that they share a recent common ancestor, but molecular studies have demonstrated that this is not the case (Cameron, 2005). Instead, there appears to be at least three independent cases of probably leaf loss in Vanilla—once in Africa, once in the Caribbean, and at least once in Asia. The section, therefore, is not monophyl-etic, but an artificial grouping of species with shared vegetative morphology derived by convergent evolution. According to modern rules of natural classification, it should not be recognized formally.

For the remaining species not classified in Vanilla section Aphyllae, Rolfe created section Foliosae. As the name indicates, all of these are leafy. This is a large group of species, and so Portères (1954) further divided the section into subsections. Vanilla section Foliosae subsection Membranaceae is a small cluster of species characterized by thin stems, thin leaves, short aerial roots, and flowers in which the labellum is not fused with the column. The labellum also lacks the complex bristles, hairs, and scales characteristic of other Vanilla species, and the fruits tend to dry on the vines and split lengthwise. Vanilla mexicana exemplifies this section, and molecular systematic studies have demonstrated that the group is the most primitive of all Vanilla species. These plants are very difficult to cultivate, probably because they have close relationships with mycorrhizal fungi, and there is no evidence that the fruits produce aromatic vanillin.

The other remaining species of the genus, including V. planifolia and V. pompona, were classified into either Vanilla section Foliosae subsection Lamellosae or subsection Papillosae. The former group is so named because species within this section are characterized by flowers with flattened scale-like appendages (lamellae), hairs, bristles, and complex ornamentation on their labella, which is always fused to the column along its margins to form a floral tube. The latter subsection was proposed for those species characterized by fleshy leaves and flowers usually with thick trichomes positioned in the center of the labellum, but without lamellate scales. Species within this leafy section are pantropical in distribution, but recent molecular systematic studies have demonstrated that this group is also artificial. Instead, species of Vanilla cluster primarily by geographic origin, as can be seen in Figure 1.3. Specifically, all Old World species (from the African and Asian Paleotropics) share a common ancestor together with the leafless New World species. These were probably dispersed from Africa to the Caribbean at some point in the past. All remaining Neotropical species, including V. planifolia, share a different common ancestor. It is within this group that aromatic fruits producing significant levels of vanillin are found. As such, the group has informally been named the “Neotropical, fragrant, leafy species.” Note that molecular studies position V. tahitensis inside this group of Neotropical relatives, thereby confirming the hybrid origin of Old World Tahitian Vanilla, many individuals of which are tetraploid, from New World parents.

FIGURE 1.3 Phylogenetic relationships among select species of Vanilla. The cladogram is based on molecular sequence data from different genes including nuclear ribosomal ITS, plastid rbcL, matK, rpoC1, and others. The hybrid origin of V. tahitensis from a cross between V. odorata and V. planifolia is highlighted by the dashed lines. Informal clades and subclades are labeled on the branch representing the common ancestor of each major species group.

In their recent synopsis of the genus, Soto Arenas and Cribb (2010) classify 106 species and offered a new infrageneric classification of Vanilla based primarily on molecular phylogenetic reconstructions. The species with membranaceous leaves are classified as Vanilla subgenus Vanilla, which contains two informal “groups.” A second subgenus, Vanilla subgen. Xanatha was created for the remainder of the species. The name is based on the Mexican Totonac Indian name for Vanilla, “xanath.” This subgenus is further divided into a pair of sections: Xanatha and Tethya. The former corresponds to mostly leafy neotropical species and is divided into six informal groups (e.g., the V. palmarum group and V. pompona group). The latter is almost entirely paleotropical in distribution, except that it also includes the Caribbean leafless species. Those taxa are clustered into an informal unit (the V. barbellata group), along with 11 other groups that are included within the section (e.g., the V. phalaenopsis group and V. africana group).

Genus Diversity within Vanilloideae: Tribe Vanilleae

Having examined higher-level relationships among subfamilies of Orchidaceae, and lower-level relationships among species within Vanilla, let us now consider relationships among the genera of Vanilloideae. Examples of these genera are shown in Figure 1.4. The subfamily is divided into two tribes, the first of which is Vanilleae. In addition to Vanilla itself, this tribe contains eight other tropical genera. Two of these, Eriaxis and Clematepistephium, are endemic to the isolated Pacific island of New Caledonia. Both genera are monotypic, meaning that they contain only a single species each. An unusual aspect of one of these two species is that Clematepistphium smilacifolium grows in the dense shade of the New Caledonian rainforests as a climbing vine. Unlike species of Vanilla, however, Clematepistphium vines produce no aerial roots. Instead they climb by twisting around the trunks of small trees. Its large, leathery leaves exhibit prominent venation patterns that are reticulate (net-like) rather than exclusively parallel as we see in most orchids and other monocotyledons (Cameron and Dickison, 1998).

The two New Caledonian endemics described above were once classified as species of the genus Epistephium, but that genus of 20 species is now considered to be exclusively South American in distribution. Most of these species are erect herbs native to open savanna habitats, and they are most commonly found in nutrient-poor areas of Brazil and Venezuela. Some have been described as scrambling loosely through surrounding vegetation, but none are true climbers. The leaves of Epistephium exhibit reticulate venation like their New Caledonian relatives, and the stunning flowers are mostly dark pink or violet. Like most vanilloid orchids, however, they are almost impossible to cultivate. The fruits of these orchids are capsules that dehisce to release distinctive seeds with circular wings, a feature in Orchidaceae found only among Vanilloideae (Cameron and Chase, 1998).

Winged seeds are also found in three other genera of vanilloid orchids: Pseudovanilla, Erythrorchis, and Galeola. These are all closely related, and are native to Southeast Asia, Northeast Australia, and a few Pacific islands. All three of these genera are leafless climbing vines, two of which (Erythrorchis and Galeola) completely lack chlorophyll. These nonphotosynthetic genera are exclusively parasitic on fungi, a lifestyle technically known as mycoheterotrophy. The leafless genus Pseudovanilla is similar to the other two in most aspects, but does eventually develop green pigment within its stems even if it may persist in a presumably nonphotosyn-thetic state during the juvenile stages of its life cycle. Recent studies have shown that these orchids are the closest living relatives of vanilla (Cameron and Molina, 2006). They climb by means of aerial roots produced at each node of the stem, just like vanilla, and their flowers are remarkably similar to those of Vanilla species. Their fruits, however, are designed to accommodate the winged seeds within and so are dry, dehiscent, and nonaromatic at maturity.

FIGURE 1.4. Representative genera of subfamily Vanilloideae, the “vanilloid orchids.” (a) Pogonia ophioglossoides from the United States; (b) Pseudovanilla foliata from Queensland, Australia; (c) Epistephium elatum from Ecuador; (d) Erythrorchis cassythoides from New South Wales, Australia; (e) Clematepistephium smilacifolium vine and leaf with reticulate venation from New Caledonia; and (f) Eriaxis rigida from New Caledonia.

There are two other genera of Vanilloideae that grow as nonphotosynthetic mycoheterotrophs: Cyrtosia and Lecanorchis. Both grow as erect herbs within forested areas of southeast Asia, and both share a number of floral features with Vanilla, which has made them difficult to be classified within the subfamily. For example, the fruits of Cyrtosia are like those of Vanilla in being fleshy and contain small, black, spherical, crustose seeds, but are typically bright red to attract bird or mammal dispersers (Nakamura and Hamada, 1978). The small flowers of Lecanorchis are similar in structure to many species of Vanilla in that the labellum is fused with the column along its margins to produce a floral tube. Also, like many species of Vanilla, the labellum of Lecanorchis is ornamented with characteristic bristles and hairs, but Lecanorchis fruits are dry capsules lacking odor and containing numerous dust-like seeds with long slender appendages. Further study of the natural history of all these genera is warranted.

Genus Diversity within Vanilloideae: Tribe Pogonieae

The second tribe within subfamily Vanilloideae is Pogonieae, which contains tropical members but also half a dozen temperate species as well. The tribe is divided into four or possibly five genera. Pogonia is one of the temperate genera, and is unusual in that its species are in disjunction between eastern North America (one species, P. ophioglossoides) and eastern Asia (3–5 species). These plants are found most commonly in acidic bogs, around the edges of lakes, and within wet savannas. Also native to North America, specifically the eastern United States, is the genus Isotria. There are two species in the genus, both of which are characteristic among orchids for having leaves arranged into a whorl of five or six. These plants are spring ephem-erals that emerge and reproduce quickly within their deciduous forest habitat before the tree canopy closes fully during the summer months. One other genus, Cleistes, has members in temperate North America, and this is the genus Cleistes. Most species of this genus (>30 species) are native to tropical South America where they are most commonly found in open savannas that experience seasonal periods of drought. They are equipped with underground tubers that presumably allow them to survive by entering an annual state of dormancy. However, one species of this genus, Cleistes divaricata, is native to the southeastern United States. Detailed systematic studies of Pogonieae and vanilloid orchids indicate that this species might be better treated as a separate genus (Cameron and Chase, 1999). The final genus of Pogonieae is Duckeella, which contains one or possibly two species indigenous to Venezuela and northern Brazil. The genus produces long linear leaves and bright yellow flowers that rise above wet grassland and savanna habitats. It may occasionally be found rooted in mats of floating vegetation.

Final Thoughts

The vanilloid orchids are a tremendously diverse group of flowering plants. Whereas the greatest amount of research has been focused on V. planifolia, it is important to realize and to appreciate that this is only one species of a lineage that has become adapted to a variety of habitats, lives in greater or lesser partnerships with fungi, exhibits a variety of growth habits, relies on different pollinators, and develops flowers of diverse form (see Figure 1.5). In other words, V. planifolia may be the only orchid species of significant agricultural value (out of more than 25,000 naturally occurring species), but it is not entirely unique in the family. Rather, it is just one of approximately 110 species in the genus Vanilla, all of which are similar to and yet different from one another. Furthermore, Vanilla is only one genus out of 15 genera that are classified within the orchid subfamily Vanilloideae (the “vanilloid orchids”), and some of these are remarkable like vanilla in terms of their growth patterns, floral structure, and fruit dispersal mechanisms. Unfortunately, these orchids are generally overlooked by biologists and those in the vanilla industry, who know only of V. planifolia. Many of the genera and species discussed in this chapter are rare and in great danger of extinction primarily due to habitat destruction. By further appreciating and studying their diversity, there is offered a hope of their survival and evolution for another 70 million years.

FIGURE 1.5. Representative species of Vanilla. (a) Vanilla phaeantha; (b) Vanilla kinabaluensis; (c) Vanilla aphylla; (d) Vanilla mexicana; (e) Vanilla mexicana in fruit with seeds that are visible; and (f) Vanilla odorata.

References

Cameron, K. 1999. Biogeography of Vanilloideae (Orchidaceae). XVI International Botanical Congress, Abstracts, p. 749. St. Louis, Missouri.

Cameron, K. 2000. Gondwanan biogeography of Vanilloideae (Orchidaceae). Southern Connections Congress, Programme and Abstracts, pp. 25–26. Lincoln, New Zealand. Cameron, K. 2003. Vanilloideae. In: A. Pridgeon, P. Cribb, M. Chase, and F. Rasmussen, eds.

Genera Orchidacearum Vol. 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 281–334. Cameron, K. 2004. Utility of plastid psaB gene sequences for investigating intrafamilial relationships within Orchidaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31:1157–1180.

Cameron, K. 2005. Recent advances in the systematics biology of Vanilla and related orchids (Vanilloideae, Orchidaceae). In: Vanilla: First International Congress. Allured Publishing, Carol Stream, Illinois.

Cameron, K. 2006. A comparison of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences for inferring phylogenetic relationships within Orchidaceae. In: J. T. Columbus, E. A. Friar, J. M. Porter, L. M. Prince, and M. G. Simpson, eds. Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution. Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California, 447–464.

Cameron, K. 2007. Molecular phylogenetics of Orchidaceae: The first decade of DNA sequencing. In: K. Cameron, J. Arditti, and T. Kull, eds. Orchid Biology Reviews and Perspectives Vol. IX. The New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx, New York, 163–200.

Cameron, K. and M. Chase. 1998. Seed morphology of the vanilloid orchids. Lindleyana 13:148–169.

Cameron, K. and W. Dickison. 1998. Foliar architecture of vanilloid orchids: Insights into the evolution of reticulate leaf venation in monocotyledons. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 128:45–70.

Cameron, K. and M. W. Chase. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of Pogoniinae (Vanilloideae, Orchidaceae): An herbaceous example of the eastern North America-eastern Asia phytogeographic disjunction. Journal of Plant Research 112:317–329.

Cameron, K. and M. C. Molina. 2006. Photosystem II gene sequences of psbB and psbC clarify the phylogenetic position of Vanilla (Vanilloideae, Orchidaceae). Cladistics 22:239–248.

Cameron, K., M. Chase, M. Whitten, P. Kores, D. Jarrell, V. Albert, T. Yukawa, H. Hills, and D. Goldman. 1999. A phylogenetic analysis of the Orchidaceae, evidence from rbcL nucleotide sequences. American Journal of Botany 86:208–224.

Chase, M. W., K. M. Cameron, R. Barrett, and J. F. Freudenstein. 2003. DNA data and Orchidaceae systematics: A new phylogenetic classification. In: K. W. Dixon, S. P. Kell, Vanilloid Orchids R. L. Barrett, and P. J. Cribb, eds. Orchid Conservation. Natural History Publications, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, 69–89.

Dressler, R. L. 1993. Phylogeny and Classification of the Orchid Family. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.

Freudenstein, J., E. Harris, and F. Rasmussen. 2002. The evolution of anther morphology in orchids: Incumbent anthers, superposed pollinia, and the vandoid complex. American Journal of Botany 89:1747–1755.

Govaerts, R., M. A. Campacci, D. Holland Baptista, P. Cribb, A. George, K. Kreuz, and J. Wood. 2008. World Checklist of Orchidaceae. The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.kew.org/wcsp/ (accessed 26 February 2008).

Janssen, T. and K. Bremer. 2004. The age of major monocot groups inferred from 800+ rbcL sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society 146:385–398.

Lindley, J. 1835. Key to Structural, Physiological and Systematic Botany. Longman, London. Lubinsky, P., K. Cameron, S. Lepers-Andrzejewski, M. Wong, M. del Carmen Molina, A.

Gómez-Pompa, and S.-C. Kim. 2008. Neotropical roots of a Polynesian spice: The hybrid origin of Tahitian vanilla, Vanilla tahitensis (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 95:1040–1047.

Moore, J. W. 1933. New and critical plants from Raiatea. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 102:1–53.

Nakamura, S. J. and M. Hamada. 1978. On the seed dispersal of an achlorophyllous orchid, Galeola septetrionalis. Journal of Japanese Botany 53:260–263.

Portères, R. 1954. Le genere Vanilla et ses especes. In: G. Bouriquet, ed. Le Vanillier et la Vanille dans le Monde. Paul Lechevalier, Paris, 94–290.

Ramirez, S. R., B. Gravendeel, R. B. Singer, C. R. Marshall, and N. E. Pierce. 2007. Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator. Nature 448:1042–1045.

Rolfe, R. A. 1896. A revision of the genus Vanilla. Journal of the Linnaean Society 32:439–478.

Soto Arenas, M. A. and P. Cribb. 2010. A new infrageneric classification and synopsis of the genus Vanilla Plum. ex Mil. (Orchidaceae: Vanillinae). Lankesteriana 9:355–398.

Soto Arenas, M. A. and R. L. Dressler. 2010. A revision of the Mexican and Central American species of Vanilla plumier ex Miller with a characterization of their ITS region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA. Lankesteriana 9:285–354.