О природе и языке

Примечания

К главе 3

Block N. The computer model of mind // D. N. Osherson, E. E. Smith (eds.). An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 3: Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.

The Brain // Daedalus. 1998. Spring.

Hauser M. The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.

Gallistel C. R. Neurons and memory // M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.). Conversations in the Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997; The replacement of general- purpose learning models with adaptively specialized learning modules // M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.). The Cognitive Neurosciences. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.

Hume D. Dialogue on Natural Religion. Цит. по рус. nep.: ЮмД. Сочинения: В 2 т. T. 2. М.: Мысль, 1965. С. 323-324.

Chomsky N. «Language and cognition», welcoming address for the Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, MIT, July 1990 // D.Johnson and C. Emeling (eds.). The Future of the Cognitive Revolution. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1997; Idem. Language and nature // Mind 104.413. P. 1-61; Idem. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Многие источники, не указанные здесь, см. в последнем сборнике.

Коугё A. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1957.

Thackray A. Atoms and Powers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.

Цит. по: Holton G. On the Art of Scientific Imagination // Daedalus. 1996. P. 183-208.

Цит. no: Ramachandran V. S. and Blakeslee S. Phantoms in the Brain. London: Fourth Estate, 1998.

Russell B. The Analysis of Matter. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1929.

Hawkins R. D. and Kandel E. К Is there a cell-biological alphabet for simple forms of learning? // Psychological Review. 1984. 91. P.376-391.

Frank A. Discover. 1997. 80. Nov.

Chomsky N. Review of B. F. Skinner. Verbal Behavior // Language. 1959. 35.1. P. 26-57.

Lewontin R. / / Osherson and Smith 1990. P.229-246.

Deacon T. The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. N.Y.: Norton, 1998.

Актуальное обсуждение этих тем см., помимо других книг, в: FodorJ. The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way: Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000; Marcus G. Can conncctionism save constructivism? // Cognition. 1998. 66. P.153-182.

Cm. (Chomsky 1959); более общее обсуждение, сфокусированное на языке, см. в: Chomsky N. Reflections on Language. N.Y.: Pantheon, 1975.

О нетривиальности этого редко признаваемого допущения см. (Fodor 2000).

Gallistel С. R. (ed.). Animal Cognition // Cognition. Special issue. 1990. 37. P. 1-2.

К главе 4

Составители выражают благодарность Марко Николису и Маноле Салюстри за помощь в редактировании гл. 4.

Chomsky N. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1981.

См., например, статьи в сб.: Chomsky N. Essays on Form and Interpretation. N.Y.: North Holland, 1977.

Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995. Также см. введение основных понятий и эмпирических результатов минимализма в: Uriagereka J. Rhyme and Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.

WeinbergS. The forces of nature // Bulletin of the American Society of Arts and Sciences. 1976. 29 Apr. P. 28-29.

Jakobson R. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbe- deutung der russischen Kasus // Travaux du Cercle lin- guistique de Prague. 1936. VI. Англ. пер. в кн.: Jakobson R. Russian and Slavic Grammar. Berlin: Mouton. Рус. nep. в кн.: Якобсон P. Избранные работы / Пер. с англ. М., 1985.

Jonas D. Clause Structure and Verb Syntax in Scandinavian and English. PhD dissertation. Harvard University, 1996; Bel- letti A. and Rizzi L. Psych-verbs and theta theory // Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 1988. 6. P.291-352.

Hale K. and Keyser S.J. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations // K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (eds.). The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993; Rizzi L. The fine structure of the left periphery // L. Haegeman (ed.). Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997. P.281-337.

Cinque G. Adverbs and Functional Heads — A Cross- linguistic Perspective. N. Y.; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Обсуждение см. в: Fodor J., Bever T. and Garrett M. The Psychology of Language. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1974.

Quine W. V. O. Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory // D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.). Semantics of Natural Language. N. Y.: Humanities Press, 1972; Quine W. V. O. Reply to Gilbert H. Harman // E. Hahn and P. A.Schilpp (eds.). The philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle: Open Court, 1986.

(Jonas 1996).

Chomsky N. Minimalist inquiries: the framework // R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.). Step by Step — Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.

Chomsky N. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory //

J.A. Fodor and J.J. Katz (eds.). The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964. P. 50-118.

Ross J. R Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation. MIT, 1967; Bach E. Questions // Linguistic Inquiry. 1971. 2. P. 153-167.

Kayne R The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994. См. также обсуждение в (Chomsky 1995a).

Об управлении и принципе пустых категорий см. (Chomsky 1981) и многие последующие работы.

Hauser М. D. The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.

Jacob F. Le jeu des possibles. Paris: Fayard, 1981.

Комментарии редактора в: Joos M. (ed.). Readings in Linguistics. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies, 1957.

Sapir E. Language. N.Y.: Harcourt Brace, 1921. (Рус. nep.: Сепир Э. Язык. Введение в изучение речи // Сепир Э. Избранные труды по языкознанию и культурологии. М.: Прогресс «Универе», 1993.)

Skinner В. F. Verbal Behavior. N. Y.: Appleton-Century- Crofts, 1957.

D’Arcy Thomson W. On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1917.

Goethe J. W. Bildung und Umbildung organischer Naturen. 1807.

См. классическую работу Алана Тьюринга (TuringA. The chemical basis of morphogenesis // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1952. P. 37-72)

и обзор по этой теме в: Stewart I. Life’s Other Secret. N. Y.: John Wiley, 1998.

Gehring W. J. and Ikeo K. Trends in Genetics. 1999. Sept.

(Fodor 2000).

(Lewontin 1990).

Lieberman Ph. The Biology and Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.

Postal P. Three Investigations of Extraction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.

Huang J. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation. MIT, 1982. О паразитических пробелах см.: Chomsky N. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982; а также указанные там источники.

Halle М. and Stevens К. N. Knowledge of language and the sounds of speech // j- Sundberg, L. Nord and R. Carlson (eds.). Music, Language, Speech and Brain. London: Macmillan, 1991. P. 1-19; Halle M. Feature geometry and feature spreading // Linguistic Inquiry. 1995. 26. P. 1-46.

Литература к главам 1-4

Abney S. (1987). The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.

Aissen J. and Perlmutter D. (1976). Clause reduction in Spanish. Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. 2. P. 1-30.

Bach E. (1971). Questions. Linguistic Inquiry. 2. P. 153-167.

Baker M. (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Barss A. (1986). Chains and Anaphoric Dependence. PhD dissertation, MIT.

Belletti A. (1988). The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry. 19. P. 1-34.

BellettiA. (1990) Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg 8c Sellier.

— (1999) Italian/Romance clitics: structure and derivation // H. van Riemsdijk (ed.). Clitics in the Languages of Europe. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. P. 543-579.

— (2001) Inversion as focalization // A. Hulke and J.Y. Pollock (eds.). Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar. Oxford; N. Y.: Oxford University Press. P. 60-90.

— (2004) Structures and Beyond: Current Issues in the Theory of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.BeUetti A. and Rizzi L. (1988). Psych-verbs and theta theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 6. P. 291-352.

— (1996) Parameters and Functional Heads. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Bloch N. (1990). The computer model of the mind // D. N. Osherson and E. E. Smith (eds.). An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 3. Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bobaljik J. (1995). Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.

Bobaljik J.D. and Jonas D. (1996). Subject position and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry. 27.2. P. 195-236.

Borer H. (1995). The ups and downs of Hebrew verb movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 13. P.527-606.

Burzio L. (1986). Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Cardinaletti A. and Starke M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of the three classes of pronouns // H. van Riemsdijk (ed.). Clitics in the Languages of Europe. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. P. 145-233.

Chomsky N. (1955). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Excerpts published by Plenum Press: N. Y., 1975. (Рус. пер.: Хомский H. Логические основы лингвистической теории // Новое в лингвистике. Вып. IV. М.: ИЛ, 1965.)

— (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. (Рус. пер.: Хомский Н. Синтаксические структуры // Новое в лингвистике. Вып. II. М.: ИЛ, 1962.)

— (1959) A review of В. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior 1957 // Language. 35. P. 26-58.

— (1964) Current issues in linguistic theory //J. Fodor and J. Katz (eds.). The Structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. P.50-118.

— (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Рус. пер.: Хомский H. Аспекты теории синтаксиса. M., 1972.)

— (1970) Remarks on nominalization // R. A.Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.). Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn. P. 184-221.

— (1973) Conditions on transformations // S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. N. Y.: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. P. 232-286.

— (1975) Reflections on Language. N. Y.: Pantheon.

— (1977) Essays on Form and Interpretation. N.Y.; Amsterdam; London: North Holland.

— (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

— (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (1986 a) Knowledge of Language. N.Y.: Praeger.

— (1986 b) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (1990) Language and cognition. Welcoming address for the Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, MIT, July // D. Johnson and C. Emeling (eds.). The Future of the Cognitive Revolution. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1997. (Рус. пер.: Хомский H. Язык и проблемы знания // Вестник МГУ. Сер. 9: Философия. 1995. N9 4, 6; 1996. №2, 4, 6.)

— (1993) A minimalist program for linguistic theory //

К. Hale and S.J. Keyser (eds.). The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. P. 1-52.

— (1995 a) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (1995 b) Language and nature. Mind 104. 413. P.1-61 // Chomsky (2000 b).

— (2000 а) Minimalist inquiries: the framework // R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.). Step by Step — Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (2000 b) New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— (2001 a) Derivation by phase // M. Kenstowicz (ed.). Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (2001 b) Beyond Explanatory Adequacy (Belletti 2004).

Cinque G. (1990). Types of A Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (1996) On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP // G. Cinque. Italian Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Cinque G., ed. (2001) Mapping Functional Structure. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Collins C. (1997). Local Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

D’Arcy Thompson W. (1917). On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Deacon T. (1998). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. N. Y.: Norton.

DegraffM., ed. (1999). Language Creation and Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Deprez V. (1998). Semantic effects of agreement: the case of French past participle agreement. Probus. P. 1-65.

Dobmvie-Sorin C. (1988). A propos de la structure du groupe nominal en Roumain // Rivista di grammatica generativa. 12. P.126-151.

Emonds J. (1978). The verbal complex V’—V in French // Linguistic Inquiry. 9. P. 151-175.

— (1980) Word order in generative grammar // Journal of Linguistic Research 1. P. 33-54.

Fodor J. (2000). The Mind Doesn’t Work that Way: Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor J. and Katz J., eds. (1964). The Structure of language. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Fodor J._t Bever T. and Garrett M. (1974). The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.

Fox D. (2000). Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fox D. and NissenbaumJ. (1999). Extraposition and the nature of covert movement. MS, Harvard University.

Frank A. (1997). Discover 80.

FreidinR (1988). Comments on Lightfoot (1988) // Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12.

Friedemann M.-A. and Riuzzi L., eds. (2000). The Acquisition of Syntax. London: Longman.

Friedemann M.A. and Siloni T. (1997). Agrobj is not Agrpartici- ple // The Linguistic Review. 14. P. 69-96.

Gallistel C. R, ed. (1990). Animal Cognition // Cognition, special issue, 37. P. 1-2.

— (1997) Neurons and memory // M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.). Conversations in the Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (1999) The replacement of general-purpose learning models with adaptively specialized learning modules // M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.). The Cognitive Neurosciences, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gehring W. J. and Kazuko I. (1999). Trends in Genetics. Sept.

GiorgiA. and Longobardi G. (1991). The Syntax of Noun Phrases: Configuration, Parameters and Empty Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

GiorgiA. andPianesiF. (1997). Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Giusti G. (1993). La sintassi dei determinanti. Padua: Unipress.

Graffi G. (1991). La sintassi tra ottocento e novecento. Bologna: II Mulino.

Grewendorf G. (2001). Multiple Wh fronting // Linguistic Inquiry. 32. P.87-122

Grimshaw J. (1986). Subjacency and the S/S’ parameter. Linguistic Inquiry. 17. P.364-369.

Hale K. (1978). On the position of Walbiri in the typology of the base. MS, MIT.

Hale K. and Keyset S.J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations // Hale and Keyser (eds.). The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Halle M. (1995). Feature geometry and feature spreading. Linguistic Inquiry. 26. P. 1-46.

Halle M. and Stevens K.N. (1991). Knowledge of language and the sounds of speech //J. Sundberg, L.Nord, and R. Carlson (eds.). Music, Language, Speech and Brain. London: Macmillan. P. 1-19.

Hauser M. (1996). The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hawkins К D. and Kandel E. К (1984). Is there a celt-biological alphabet for simple forms of learning? // Psychological Review. 91. P.376-391.

Holton G. (1996). On the art of scientific imagination // Daedalus. P.183-208.

Homstein N. (1984). Logic as Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

HuangJ. (1982). Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.

Hyams N. (1986). Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Jackendoff К (1977). X’ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Jacob F. (1981). Le jeu des possibles. Paris: Fayard.

Jakobson К (1936). Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamt- bedeutung der russischen Kasus, TCLP, VI. English translation // Russian and Slavic Grammar. Berlin: Mouton, 1984. (Рус. пер.: Якобсон P. К общему учению о падеже. Общее значение русского падежа // Якобсон Р. Избранные работы. М.: Прогресс, 1985.)

Johnson К. (1991). Object positions // Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 9. P. 577-636.

Jonas D. (1996). Clause Structure and Verb Syntax in Scandinavian and English. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.

Joos M. (1957). Readings in Linguistics. Washington: American Council of Learner Societies.

Katz J. and Postal P. (1964). An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kayne К (1975). French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (1984) Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

— (1989) Facets of Romance past participle agreement // P. Beninca (ed.). Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. P.85-103.

— (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (2001) Parameters and Universal. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Kiss К., ed. (1995). Discourse-Configurational Languages. Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

Koopman H. (1983). The Syntax of Verbs. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Koopman H. and Sportiche D. (1991). The position of subjects // Lingua. 85. P.211-258.

Koyre A. (1957). From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Kuroda S. Y. (1988). Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese // W.J. Poser (ed.). Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax. Stanford: CSLI. P. 103-143 (also in Linguisticae Investigationes. 12. P. 1-47).

Lasnik H. (1976). Remarks on coreference // Linguistic Analysis 2. P. 1-22.

— (1989) Essays on Anaphora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

— (1992) Case and expletives: notes toward a parametric account. Linguistic Inquiry. 23. P.381-405.

Lasnik H. and Saito M. (1992). Move Alpha: Conditions on its Application and Output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lebeaux D. (1988). Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Lees К В. (1960). The Grammar of English Nominalization. The Hague: Mouton.

Lewontin К (1990). The evolution of cognition // D. N. Osher- son and E. E. Smith (eds.). An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 3. Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. P. 229-246.

Lieberman P. (1984). The Biology and Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lightfoot D. (1989). The child’s triggering experience: de- gree-o learnability // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 12. P. 321-375.

Longobardi G. (1994). Reference and proper names: a theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form // Linguistic Inquiry. 25. P. 609-665.

Manzini M. R (1992). Locality: A Theory and Some of Its Empirical Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marcus G. (1998). Can connectionism save constructivism? // Cognition. 66. P. 153-182.

May R (1985). Logical Form; Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

McCloskey J. (1996). On the scope of verb movement in Irish // Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 14. P.47-104.

Mehler J. and Dupoux E. (1992). Naitre humain. Paris: Odile Jacob.

Mow A. (1990). The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Obenauer H. G. (1994). Aspects de la Syntaxe A’. These d’Etat, Universite de Paris VIII.

Osherson D. N. and Smith E. E. (eds.). (1990). An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 3. Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Perlmutter D. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis // Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. P. 157-189.

Pollock J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP // Linguistic Inquiry. 20. P.365-424.

Pollock J. Y. and Poletto C. (2001). On the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions (Rizzi 2004).

Postal P. (1999). The Investigations of Extraction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Quine W. V. О. (1972). Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory // D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.). Semantics of Natural Language. N.Y.: Humanities Press.

— (1986) Reply to Gilbert H. Harman // E. Hahn and P. A. Schilpp (eds.). The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle: Open Court.

Radford A. (1997). Syntax — A Minimalist Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ramachandran V. S. and Blakeslee S. (1998). Phantoms in the Brain. London: Fourth Estate.

Reinhart 71 (1976). The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. PhD dissertation, MIT.

— (1983) Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

— (1995) Interface strategies. OTS Working Papers, University of Utrecht.

Ritter E. (1991). Two functional categories in Noun Phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew // S. Rothstein (ed.). Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing // Syntax and Semantics 26. N. Y.: Academic Press. P. 37-62.

Rizzi L. (1976). Ristrutturazione // Rivista di grammatica generative. 1. P. 1-54.

— (1978) Violations of the Wh Island Constraint in Italian and the Subjacency Condition // Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics II.

— (1982) Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

— (1990) Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

— (1997 a) A parametric approach to comparative syntax: properties of the pronominal system // L. Haegeman (ed.). The New Comparative Syntax. London; N.Y.: Longman. P. 268-285.

— (1997 b) The fine structure of the left periphery //

Haegeman (ed.). Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. P.281-337.

— (2000) Comparative Syntax and Language Acquisition. London: Routledge.

— (2001a) Relativized minimality effects // M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.). Handbook of Syntartic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. P.89-110.

— (2001 b) Extraction from Weak Islands, Reconstruction and Agreement. MS, University of Siena.

— (2004) The Structure of CP and IP. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

— Roberts I. (1993). Verbs and Diachronic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

— (2004) The fine structure of the C-system in some Celtic languages. MS, Cambridge University (Rizzi 2004).

Rosenbaum P. S. (1967). The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ross J.R. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD Dissertation, MIT.

— (1986) Infinite Syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Russell B. (1929). The Analysis of Matter. Leipzig: Teubner.

Sapir E. (1921). Language. N.Y.: Harcourt Brace. (Рус. nep.: Сепир Э. Язык. Введение в изучение речи // Сепир Э. Избранные труды по языкознанию и культурологии. M. : ИГ «Прогресс» «Универе», 1993.)

Saussure F. de (1916/1972). Cours de linguistique generate. Paris: Payot. (Рус. пер.: Соссюр Ф. де. Курс общей лингвистики // Соссюр Ф. де. Труды по языкознанию. М.: Прогресс, 1977; Соссюр Ф.де. Курс общей лингвистики. М.: УРСС, 2004.)

Shlonsky U. (1997). Clause Structure and Word Order in Hebrew and Arabic: An Essay in Comparative Semitic Syntax. Oxford; N. Y.: Oxford University Press.

Sigurdsson H. (2000). To be and oblique subject: Russian vs. Icelandic // Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax. 66. P. 1-32.

Siloni T. (1997). Noun Phrases and Nominalizations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Skinner B.F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. N.Y.: Appleton-Century- Crofts.

Sportiche D. (1981). Bounding nodes in French // The Linguistic Review. 1. P.219-246.

(1998) Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure: Subjects, Agreement, Case and Clitics. London; N.Y.: Routledge.

Starke M. (2001). Move Dissolves into Merge. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Geneva.

Stewart I. (1998). Life’s Other Secret. N. Y.: John Wiley.

Szabolcsi A. (1994). The Noun Phrase // F. Kiefer and К. E. Kiss (eds.). The Structure of Hungarian // Syntax and Semantics 27. N. Y.: Academic Press. P. 179-274.

— (1999) Weak Islands. Syn Com Case Studies / M. Eve- raert and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.). University of Utrecht, University of Tilburg.

Thackray A. (1970). Atoms and Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

TorregoE. (1995). On the nature of clitic doubling// H. Campos and P. Kempchinsky (eds.). Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory. Georgetown University Press.

Turing A. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. P.37-72.

Uriagereka J. (1995). Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance // Linguistic Inquiry. 26. P.79-123.

(1998) Rhyme and Reason — An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Vergnaud J.-FL (1982). Dependances et niveaux de representation en syntaxe. These de doctorat d’etat, Universite de Paris VII.

ViknerS. (1997). V to I and inflection for person in all tenses // L. Haegeman (ed.). The New Comparative Syntax. Harlow: Longman. P. 189-213.

Watanabe A. (1992). Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh in situ //Journal of East Asian Linguistics. 1. P.255-291.

Weinberg S. (1976). The forces of nature // Bulletin of the American Society of Arts and Sciences. 29.4. P. 28-29.

Wexler K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation // D. Lightfoot and N. Hornstein (eds.). Verb Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P.305-350.

— (1998) Very early parameter setting and the Unique Checking Constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage // Lingua. 106. P.23-79.

Williams E. (1981). Argument structure and morphology // The Linguistic Review 1. P.81-114.

— (1984) There insertion // Linguistic Inquiry. 15. P.131-153.

— (1997) Blocking and anaphora // Linguistic Inquiry. 28. P.577-628.

Wilson E. О. (1998). The brain // Daedalus. Spring.

Zaenen A._y MalingJ. and Thrainsson H. (1985). Case and grammatical functions: the Icelandic passive // Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. P.441-483.