Chaining results using match can get pretty untidy; luckily, the ? operator can be used to make things pretty again. ? is used at the end of an expression returning a Result, and is equivalent to a match expression, where the Err(err) branch expands to an early Err(From::from(err)), and the Ok(ok) branch expands to an ok expression.
mod checked {
#[derive(Debug)]
enum MathError {
DivisionByZero,
NonPositiveLogarithm,
NegativeSquareRoot,
}
type MathResult = Result;
fn div(x: f64, y: f64) -> MathResult {
if y == 0.0 {
Err(MathError::DivisionByZero)
} else {
Ok(x / y)
}
}
fn sqrt(x: f64) -> MathResult {
if x < 0.0 {
Err(MathError::NegativeSquareRoot)
} else {
Ok(x.sqrt())
}
}
fn ln(x: f64) -> MathResult {
if x <= 0.0 {
Err(MathError::NonPositiveLogarithm)
} else {
Ok(x.ln())
}
}
// Intermediate function
fn op_(x: f64, y: f64) -> MathResult {
// if `div` "fails", then `DivisionByZero` will be `return`ed
let ratio = div(x, y)?;
// if `ln` "fails", then `NonPositiveLogarithm` will be `return`ed
let ln = ln(ratio)?;
sqrt(ln)
}
pub fn op(x: f64, y: f64) {
match op_(x, y) {
Err(why) => panic!(match why {
MathError::NonPositiveLogarithm
=> "logarithm of non-positive number",
MathError::DivisionByZero
=> "division by zero",
MathError::NegativeSquareRoot
=> "square root of negative number",
}),
Ok(value) => println!("{}", value),
}
}
}
fn main() {
checked::op(1.0, 10.0);
}
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Be sure to check the documentation, as there are many methods to map/compose Result.